Abstract
Background:
Staphylococci are the most common cause of pyoderma in dogs.
Aims:
The purpose of the present study was to investigate clinical, bacteriological and histopathological aspects of bacterial skin infections in a population of Iranian domestic dogs with first-time pyoderma.
Methods:
The study animals were 61 clinical cases of Iranian domestic dogs with first-time pyoderma. The diagnosis of pyoderma was based on the history, the presence of variable gross cutaneous lesions, positive findings on microscopic examination of surface cytology and histopathological findings.
Results:
Detection of pyoderma amongst adult dogs was significantly higher than puppies (P=0.001). Large breed dogs were presented more frequently for pyoderma in comparison to small breeds (P=0.002). Bacterial species were recovered from 43 of the 61 (70.49%) studied animals. No isolates were recovered from 18 studied dogs. The most frequently recovered bacterial genus was Staphylococcus (32/43 isolates, 74.41%) including: S. epidermidis (22/43 isolates, 51.16%), S. aureus (7/43 isolates, 16.27%), and S. pseudintermedius (3/43 isolates, 6.97%). Staphylococci species resistance was most commonly seen against amoxicillin (94.11%), penicillin (83.35%), and ampicillin (76.47%). Resistant to cephalexin and cefoxitin was 5.88% and 2.94%, respectively. A total of 27 of the staphylococci isolated (84.37%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent and 19 isolates (59.37%) were resistant to three or more antimicrobial drugs.
Conclusion:
A better understanding of this microbial population is critical for clarification of the pathophysiology of bacterial skin diseases.
Key Words: Dog, Pyoderma, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Introduction
Staphylococci are the most common cause of bacterial skin infection in humans and dogs (von Eiff et al., 2002 ▶; Pinchbeck et al., 2006 ▶). They can be differentiated by their ability to produce coagulase, with coagulase positive staphylococci characterized more pathogenic than coagulase negative species (von Eiff et al., 2002 ▶; Devriese et al., 2005 ▶; Rich, 2005 ▶). In cases of canine pyoderma the most commonly isolated coagulase-positive staphylococci are Staphylococcus pseudinter-medius, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus schleiferi (Shimizu et al., 2001 ▶; Morris et al., 2006 ▶; Fazakerley et al., 2009 ▶). Authors reported the isolation of different other kinds of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci from dogs with pyoderma (Zdovc et al., 2004 ▶; May, 2006 ▶; Hauschild and Wójcik, 2007 ▶).
Treatment of staphylococci skin infections fully depend on the case; true first time pyoderma cases, that is, cases that have not previously been treated for pyoderma, with no risk factors, are usually treated with empirically certain antimicrobial agents. Otherwise, culture is indicated. Therefore, assessment of changes in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over time is important to determine whether the organism remains susceptible to empirically selected antimicrobial agents.
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from dogs with first-time pyoderma carried out in Iran. The objectives were:
1) To study the prevalence of staphylococci isolation from dogs with first time pyoderma
2) To investigate the number of cultures that were positive for a bacterial genus from dogs presenting to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
This is important in understanding changes in staphylococcal populations and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in dogs with first time pyoderma.
Materials and Methods
Dogs and clinical presentation
This research proposal has received ethical approval from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Research Office. The study animals were 61 clinical cases of Iranian domestic dogs with first-time pyoderma admitted to Veterinary Teaching Hospital of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran from September 2012 to October 2017.
The dogs’ breeds (pure and mixed breed dogs; small [<9 kg] or large [≥9 kg]; according to the official breed standard from the American Kennel Club (www.akc.org/breeds)), sex (male or female), and age (puppy [0-6 months]; juvenile [7 months-2 years]; adult [more than 2 years]), were recorded to determine whether they were associated with the likelihood of dogs exhibiting pyoderma.
The diagnosis of pyoderma was based on the history, the presence of variable gross cutaneous lesions (papules, pustules, epidermal collarettes, erythema, crusting, lichenification, and/or hyperpigmentation), positive findings on microscopic examination of surface cytology (glass slide impression smears revealing neutrophils with intracellular bacteria) and, in most of the cases, histopathological findings. More information including anatomic site and depth of bacterial skin diseases were recorded. The pyoderma was classified as superficial when only small pustules or papules were found, and as deep when there were noduli and/or fistulating tracts (Holm et al., 2002 ▶).
Underlying diseases were excluded via the following tests performed on all dogs: coat brushings, skin scrapings, impression smears, fungal culture, skin biopsies, complete blood count and in a limited number of cases, biochemical profiles and endocrine function tests. In order to diagnose allergic dermatitis, a detailed interpretation of historical and clinical signs and a restriction-provocation dietary method were used.
Specimen collection and bacterial isolation
Swabs for bacterial culture were taken from pustule or papule without previous sterilization. All swabs were grown on Columbia Blood agar (Merck, USA) and Mannitol Salt agar (Merck, USA). All plates were incubated aerobically and anaerobically at 37°C for 18-24 h. Isolates were recognized on the basis of colony morphology, Gram-staining, pigment production and hemolysis. All samples were subject to further analysis and biochemical testing. For all Gram-positive, catalase-positive, oxidase negative cocci with colony morphology fitting with Staphylococcus species, coagulase activity was determined via the tube coagulase test using rabbit plasma.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates was determined on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, USA) using the disk diffusion method (CLSI, 2013 ▶). Eighteen different antimicrobial agents were studied: ampicillin (10 µg/disk), amoxicillin (25 µg/disk), penicillin (10 units/disk), cephalexin (30 µg/disk), cefoxitin (30 µg/disk), cloxacillin (5 µg/disk), oxytetracycline (30 µg/disk), doxycycline (30 µg/disk), gentamicin (10 µg/disk), kanamycin (30 µg/disk), streptomycin (10 µg/disk), erythromycin (15 µg/disk), enrofloxacin (5 µg/disk), norfloxacin (10 µg/disk), difloxacin (10 µg/disk), chloramphenicol (30 µg/disk), novobiocin (30 µg/disk), and Sulphamethoxazole/Trimethoprin (25 µg/disk). For quality control S. aureus reference strain ATCC 25923 was used.
Dermatohistopathology
According to the permission given by the owners, a minimum of two 6 mm punch biopsy samples of affected skin were obtained from 42 dogs of the 61 studied dogs. 19 owners did not accept the terms of agreement to perform this test. All biopsies were assessed by one pathologist who was blind to the results of all other tests. Histopathologically (using haematoxylin and eosin staining), superficial pyodermas were classified as bacterial infections that involve the epidermis and follicular epithelium and when only small pustules or papules were found. Deep pyodermas were diagnosed as follicular infection that breaks through the hair follicle and when there were noduli and/or fistulating tracts (Holm et al., 2002 ▶; Miller et al., 2013 ▶).
Statistical analysis
In order to report the association of independent variables (breed, age, sex) with the occurrence of pyoderma, χ2 test was used. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Demographic information
Included in the study were 61 dogs with first time pyoderma that had been treated at Veterinary Teaching Hospital of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Overall, 36 (59.01%) studied dogs were male and 28 dogs (40.98%) were female. The majority of studied dogs (41; 67.21%) were large breeds compared to 20 (32, 79%) small breed dogs. The median age was 34.2 months (minimum value-maximum value: 1-108 months; nine studied dogs (9.83%) were puppies, 19 (39.34%) were juveniles, and 33 (50.81%) were adults. The diagnosis of first time pyoderma amongst adult dogs was significantly higher than puppies (P=0.001) and in large breeds in comparison to small breeds (P=0.002).
Anatomic distribution of skin lesions in dogs with pyoderma
Table 1 displays the sites where pyoderma skin lesions occurred in the studied dogs. According to the data, two anatomic sites (the “head, face, and pinna” and the “trunk”) were the most affected lesion regions, each with 19 cases (26.76%).
Table 1.
Anatomic site predilection to canine pyoderma in 61 dogs with first-time pyoderma
| Anatomic site | Surface pyoderma | Superficial pyoderma | Deep pyoderma | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head, face, pinna | 1 | 3 | 15 | 19 |
| Fore limbs | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Hind limbs | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| Paws | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dorsum | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Trunk | 1 | 5 | 13 | 19 |
| Ventrum | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| Perineal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 21 | 44 | 71 |
Total number is greater than 61 (No. of studied dogs), since some of them had more than one anatomic site of pyoderma involvement
Underlying diseases in dogs with pyoderma
An identifiable underlying disease was present in 52 (85.24%) of the 61 studied dogs. Twenty-three dogs had allergic skin disease (including: 10 dogs with flea bite hypersensitivity, 8 dogs with atopic dermatitis, and 5 dogs with food hypersensitivity), 11 dogs had cutaneous manifestations of visceral leishmaniosis, 9 dogs had parasitic skin diseases, 3 dogs had neoplasia (including: basal cell tumor, fibroblastoma, and hemangiosarcoma), 4 dogs had endocrine disease, 1 dog had seborrhetic dermatitis, 1 dog had Malassezia dermatitis, and for 9 dogs an underlying disease was not identified.
Bacterial species distribution
Bacterial species were recovered from 43 of the 61 (70.49%) studied animals. No isolates were recovered from 18 studied dogs. The most frequently recovered bacterial genus was Staphylococcus (32/43 isolates, 74.41%). Staphylococcus epidermidis (22/43 isolates, 51.16%) represents the most frequent recovered bacterial isolates in the studied dogs. Two other staphylococci species recovered from the studied animals were S. Aureus (7/43 isolates, 16.27%), and S. pseudintermedius (3/43 isolates, 6.97%) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Bacterial species were recovered from 43 (70.49%) of 61 of the studied animals
| Species | No. of dogs |
|---|---|
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | 22 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 7 |
| Staphylococcus pseudointermedius | 3 |
| Streptococcus dysgalactiae | 1 |
| Streptococcus equi | 1 |
| Proteus | 5 |
| Escherichia coli | 2 |
| Glucose non fermentative | 1 |
| Pseudomonas | 1 |
| Total | 43 |
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Staphylococci species resistance was mostly seen against amoxicillin (94.11%), penicillin (83.35%), and ampicillin (76.47%). Resistance to cephalexin and cefoxitin was 5.88% and 2.94%, respectively. A total of 27 of the staphylococci isolated (84.37%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent. 55% (19/32 staphylococci isolates) of the isolates were resistant to three or more antimicrobial drugs (multi resistance).
Histopathologic results
In the present study, 44 cases were categorized as deep and 27 as superficial pyoderma. The dog with superficial lesions had a combination of perivascular to periadnexal to interface dermatitis, epidermal hyperplasia with superficial pustulation and crusting. Neutrophils are also prominent in the inflamed dermis. The histological changes in dogs with deep pyoderma included a suppurative folliculitis and furunculosis, with pyogranulomatous (and eosinophilic in three dogs) perivascular and periadnexal dermatitis and pyogranulomatous panniculitis. Intra- and subcorneal pustules (neutrophilic) without bacteria were seen in two dogs. A complete signalment and histopathological features of 42 dogs with first time pyoderma are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Characteristics and histopathological features of 42 dogs with first time pyoderma
| Dog No. | Breed | Age (month) | Sex | Category of main clinical presentation | Gross (macroscopic) lesions | Microscopic features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Terrier | 21 | M | Pruritic | Pruritus and multiple erythematous papulopustular lesions of varying size on abdomen | Moderate hyperkeratosis, superficial dermatitis (mixed type inflammatory cells), epidermal spongiosis |
| 2 | Mixed | 30 | F | Pruritic | Mild pruritus and erythematous macular on abdomen and hind limbs | Skin containing epithelial layer with mature collagen bundles in dermis without dermal adnexa (hair follicules or sebaceous glands) |
| 3 | Terrier | 60 | F | An inflammation around the neck with pruritus and crust | Severe hyperkeratosis, suppurative dermatitis | |
| 4 | Mixed | 24 | M | Pruritic | Pruritus, alopecia and primary erythema | Mild infiltration of inflammatory cells |
| 5 | Terrier | 18 | M | Pruritic | Pruritus, and alopecia | Mild hyperkeratosis, mild infiltration of inflammatory cells in the dermis, eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in follicular epithelium |
| 6 | Doberman | 6 | M | Pruritic | Diffuse erythematous pruritic lesions in addition to crusts and exudative ulcers | Spongiosis, intraepidermal vesicle, acute dermatitis, hemorrhage, vasculitis |
| 7 | Mixed | 7 | M | Pruritic | Pruritus and erythematous lesions | Acute exudative dermatitis |
| 8 | GSH | 18 | M | Alopecia | Alopecia, ulcer and erythema on the flank | Acute exudative dermatitis, intraepidermal vesicle and pustule |
| 9 | Terrier | 42 | F | Alopecia | Bilaterally symmetrical alopecia, pruritus, and erythematous lesions | Epidermal spongiosis, diffused severe infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils, crust formation |
| 10 | Asian shepherd | 24 | M | Alopecia | Extensive scaling and alopecia with facial involving | Sebaceous adenitis, Hidradenitis |
| 11 | Spitz | 24 | F | Alopecia | Bilateral symmetrical flank alopecia and multiple comedones on the ventrum | Hyperkeratosis, granulation tissue |
| 12 | GSH | 30 | F | Alopecia | Crusting, alopecia, and hyperpigmentation of neck, nose and ear pinna | Severe hyperkeratosis, crust formation, acute hemorrhagic dermatitis, fungal microorganisms, severe hemorrhage |
| 13 | GSH | 6 | M | Facial dermatitis | Scale and crust on the ear pinna, periocular and perioral ulcerated nodules | Acute dermatitis, epithelial necrosis, granulation tissue, crust formation |
| 14 | GSH | 6 | F | Facial dermatitis | Periocular and perioral ulcerated nodules | Acute dermatitis, crust formation |
| 15 | Terrier | 48 | F | Facial dermatitis | Nasal depigmentation and pustular dermatitis | Skin hydropic degeneration, intracytoplasmic inclusion body |
| 16 | Mixed | 7 | F | Facial dermatitis | Perioral ulcerative dermatitis and a large, non-pigmented, ulcerated lesion of the nasal planum | Acute suppurative dermatitis |
| 17 | GSH | 18 | F | Facial dermatitis | Large crusty lesions on nasal planum | Hyperkeratosis, spongiosis, hydropic degeneration, fibrinous exudates, severe hyperemia, neutrophilic infiltration, crust formation |
| 18 | GSH | 108 | M | Facial dermatitis | Nasal planum ulcerative dermatitis, periocular ulcerative dermatitis | Severe spongiosis, severe inflammatory cell infiltration (mixed type), crust formation, suprabacillary clefts, vesicle formation |
| 19 | Mixed | 12 | F | Facial dermatitis | Scale and crust on the ear pinna, periocular, and perioral ulcerated nodules | Epithelial spongiosis, superficial necrosis, crust formation, infiltration of mononuclear cells in dermis |
| 20 | GSH | 30 | M | Facial dermatitis | Severe facial dermatitis | Acute lymphadenitis, hemorrhage, ulcer formation |
| 21 | GSH | 12 | F | Facial dermatitis | Periocular and perioral ulcerated nodules | Epithelial necrosis, ulcer formation, acute dermatitis, leishman bodies in macrophages, infiltration of macrophages |
| 22 | Doberman | 36 | F | Facial dermatitis | Periocular and perioral ulcerated nodules | Ulcer formation, severe infiltration of macrophages containing Leishman bodies |
| 23 | Mixed | 5 | M | Facial dermatitis | Large ulcerative lesions around mouth and on ventral part of muzzle | Infiltration of macrophages containing Leishman bodies - ulcer formation |
| 24 | Terrier | 12 | M | Facial dermatitis | Ulcerative nasal planum | Leishman bodies |
| 25 | Asian shepherd | 24 | M | Facial dermatitis | Severe chronic crusty lesion and ulcers on head and face | Crust formation, acute suppurative dermatitis, epithelial necrosis |
| 26 | GSH | 6 | F | Facial dermatitis | Severe ulcerative dermatitis of the margin of both pinna | Ulcer formation, necrotic debris, infiltration of neutrophils, microbial colonies, granulation tissue, hyaline degeneration of collagen bundles |
| 27 | Spitz | 7 | F | Facial dermatitis | Ulcer on the nasal planum | Severe infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, hyperemia, pyogranulomatous dermatitis |
| 28 | Mixed | 18 | M | Facial dermatitis | Ulcer on the nasal planum | Crust formation, diffused pyogranulomatous dermatitis, Leishman bodies |
| 29 | Terrier | 24 | M | Facial dermatitis | Severe bilateral mucopurulent discharge and crusts on the nose | Severe hyperkeratosis, crust formation, acute dermatitis, Leishman bodies |
| 30 | GSH | 42 | M | Facial dermatitis | Perioral pustular dermatitis | Crust formation, infiltration of mononuclear cells in dermis, ulcer |
| 31 | GSH | 18 | F | Facial dermatitis | Crusty lesions on nasal planum | Hyperkrtatosis, spongiosis, hydropic degeneration, fibrinous exudate, severe hyperemia, neutrophilic infiltration and crust formation |
| 32 | Husky | 18 | M | Pododermatitis | Pododermatitis and hyperkeratosis of foot pads | Epithelial necrosis, granulomatous dermatitis |
| 33 | Terrier | 48 | M | Dermatitis of hind limbs | Ulcerated nodule on rear leg | Mild hyperkeratosis, lymphocytic dermatitis |
| 34 | Doberman | 12 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Superficial pyoderma of testicular scrotum | Epithelial necrosis, ulcer formation, acute suppurative dermatitis, crust formation, proliferation of fibroblasts and healing process |
| 35 | Doberman | 3 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Papulopostular and exudative lesions on ventrum | Acute fibrinopulerant dermatitis, ulcer formation |
| 36 | Mixed | 36 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Vesicles on prepuce and an ulcer on pinna | Ulcer formation, hyperkeratosis, spongiosis |
| 37 | Mixed | 18 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Large inflamed and erosive testes | Epithelial hyperplasia, spongiosis |
| 38 | Doberman | 1 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Vesiculopustular on the ventrum | Hyperemia, acute dermatitis, spongiosis |
| 39 | Shi Tzu | 60 | F | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Large pustules on the flank area | Keratinic tissue without cellular component |
| 40 | Mixed | 84 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Severe traumatic ulcers | Dissociation of keratinocytes, intracellular edema and hydropic degeneration with dermatitis |
| 41 | Terrier | 168 | M | Pyoderma of trunk, ventrum an genital regions | Ulcerative and erythematous lesions on forelimb | Epithelial necrosis, ulcer formation, necrotic debris and many infiltration of neutrophils |
| 42 | Terrier | 60 | F | Tumor | A 3 × 3 mass near the pinna | Basal cell tumor and epithelial necrosis and dermatitis |
GSH: German Shepherd dog, M: Male, and F: Female
Discussion
The results of the present study indicate that most of the domestic dogs admitted to Veterinary Teaching Hospital of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Northeast of Iran) with clinical first time pyoderma were infected with bacterial species (70.49%), as described by other authors (Futagawa-Saito et al., 2004 ▶; Hartmann et al., 2005 ▶; Huerta et al., 2011 ▶). To date, there is only one reported study (Huerta et al., 2011 ▶) in which all samples obtained from dogs with first time pyoderma were positive for staphylococci.
In the present study, 44 of the culture positive cases were categorized as deep pyoderma. It is very surprising that the majority of the dogs had deep infection as first time pyoderma. In contrast to the present study in which the prevalence of deep pyoderma is higher than superficial and surface pyoderma, Holm et al. (2002) ▶ reported higher prevalence of superficial pyoderma among first time pyoderma-affected dogs (153 of 201 culture positive cases). However, they reported higher prevalence of deep pyoderma among recurrent cases (109 of 201 culture positive cases).
The nine bacterial species isolated in the present study (Table 2) are known opportunistic pathogens that can be found both in healthy dogs as part of the normal skin microbiota and in various canine infections including pyoderma (May, 2006 ▶; Gortel, 2013 ▶; Weese, 2013 ▶).
In the present study, the most frequently recovered bacterial genus was Staphylococcus (32/43 isolates, 74.41%). Holm et al. (2002) ▶ reported the isolation of staphylococci from mucosal sites (and not lesional sites) in 92% of the 201 cases of first-time pyoderma in Sweden. Also, Huerta et al. (2011) ▶ reported a higher frequency of isolation of staphylococci in the pyoderma-affected dogs than in the healthy dogs. In their study, staphylococci were recovered from 24 (100%) dogs with first time pyoderma and from 27 (100%) of the dogs with recurrent pyoderma.
According to the results of the present study, S. epidermidis was the most prevalent bacterial isolate. Similarly, Schmidt et al. (2014) ▶ reported this species as the most common staphylococci species in healthy Labrador retrievers in the UK. Staphylococcus epidermidis is regularly isolated from the skin and haircoat of normal dogs (Miller et al., 2013 ▶). This organism is not considered pathogenic unless isolated from lesioned skin. Recent studies indicate the outset of these species’ involvement in canine pyoderma and otitis (Hauschild and Wójcik, 2007 ▶).
The second most common Staphylococcus in the current study was S. aureus. This bacterium is a CoPS and is commonly isolated from normal skin and should be considered resident. Reports of human infection or colonization from companion animals (Simoons-Smit et al., 2000 ▶; van Duijkeren et al., 2004 ▶) have shown the potential of animals to act as reservoirs for transmission of S. aureus.
According to the present study, S. pseudintermedius was covered from three (6.97%) canine pyoderma cases. In contrast, other studies have found that S. pseudintermedius is a prevalent isolate among dogs with pyoderma (Morris et al., 2006 ▶; Fazakerley et al., 2009 ▶). The reason for our finding is not clear. In a recent study in South Korea (Han et al., 2016 ▶) the overall prevalence of S. pseudintermedius in healthy dogs (29.4%) was comparatively lower than in previous studies in that area (35.5% and 74.7%) (Yoo et al., 2010 ▶; Moon et al., 2012 ▶).
In the present study the most efficient antibiotics against Staphylococcus spp. were cephalosporins; resistant to cephalexin and cefoxitin was 5.88% and 2.94%, respectively. However, we did not use oxacillin for the detection of methicillin resistance. CLSI (2013) recommends usage of cefoxitin instead of oxacillin when using the disk diffusion method to determine resistance against methicillin for S. aureus.
The results of the present study showed the effectiveness of the different groups of antimicrobial agents examined, and confirmed the results of previous authors who report cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, gentamicin and rifampin to be first-line choices in Staphylococcus-induced canine pyoderma (Morris et al., 2006 ▶; Vanni et al., 2009 ▶). A number of authors report differences in the resistance patterns between isolates (Futagawa-Saito et al., 2004 ▶; Hartmann et al., 2005 ▶). According to the results of in vitro susceptibility studies it would not be meaningful to use antibiotics such as amoxicillin, penicillin and ampicillin to treat canine pyoderma since there is high resistance against these antibiotics. Based on findings of the present study, empirical treatment of canine superficial pyoderma caused by Staphylococcus spp. with cephalosporins appears appropriate. However, bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should always be pursued in recurrent or refractory infections.
In conclusion, we found that the most frequently recovered bacterial genus from a population of Iranian domestic dogs with first time clinical pyoderma was Staphylococcus including: S. epidermidis, S. aureus, and S. pseudintermedius. Staphylococci species resistance was most commonly seen against amoxicillin, penicillin, and ampicillin. According to results of the present study, a total of 27 of the staphylococci isolated (84.37%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent. This result should be interpreted with caution because of the small population of staphylococci. A large-scale study is necessary to explain the association of epidemiological variables affecting bacterial skin infections in dogs.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Thesis No. 356). We would like to thank Dr. T. Gholamhosseini Moghadam for the excellent technical assistance.
References
- CLSI, authors. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals approved standard. VET08, 4th Edn., CLSI document Wayne, PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Devriese LA, Vancanneyt M, Baele M, Vaneechoutte M, DeGraef E, Snauwaert C, Cleenwerck I, Dawyndt P, Swings J, Decostere A, Haesebrouck F. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sp nov a coagulase-positive species from animals. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005;55:1569–1573. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fazakerley J, Nuttall T, Sales D, Schmidt V, Carter SD, Hart CA, McEwan NA. Staphylococcal colonization of mucosal and lesion skin sites in atopic and healthy dogs. Vet. Dermatol. 2009;20:179–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Futagawa-Saito K, Suzuki M, Ohsawa M, Ohshima S, Sakurai N, Ba-Thein W, Fukuyasu T. Identification and prevalence of an enterotoxin-related gene, se-int, in Staphylococcus intermedius isolates from dogs and pigeons. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;96:1361–1366. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gortel K. Recognizing pyoderma: more difficult than it may seem. Vet. Clin. North Am.: Small Anim. Pract. 2013;43:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han JI, Yang CH, Park HM. Prevalence and risk factors of Staphylococcus spp carriage among dogs and their owners: a cross-sectional study. Vet. J. 2016;21:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann FA, White DG, West SE, Walker RD, Deboer DJ. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius carriage by healthy dogs and comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns to isolates from dogs with pyoderma. Vet. Microbiol. 2005;108:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauschild T, Wójcik A. Species distribution and properties of staphylococci from canine dermatitis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2007;82:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holm BR, Petersson U, Mörner A, Bergström K, Franklin A, Greko C. Antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci from canine pyoderma: a prospective study of first-time and recurrent cases in Sweden. Vet. Record. 2002;15:600–605. doi: 10.1136/vr.151.20.600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huerta B, Maldonado A, Ginel PJ, Tarradas C, Gómez-Gascón L, Astorga RJ, Luque I. Risk factors associated with the antimicrobial resistance of staphylococci in canine pyoderma. Vet. Microbiol. 2011;150:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- May ER. Bacterial skin diseases: current thoughts on pathogenesis and management. Vet. Clin. North Am.: Small Anim. Pract. 2006;36:185–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2005.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller WH, Griffin CE, Campbell KL. Bacterial skin diseases. In: Miller W, Griffin C, Campbell KM, editors. Muller and Kirk’s small animal dermatology. 7th Edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; pp. 184–198. [Google Scholar]
- Moon BY, Youn JH, Shin S, Hwang SY, Park YH. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from veterinary hospitals in South Korea. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2012;24:489–498. doi: 10.1177/1040638712440985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris DO, Rook KA, Shofer FS, Rankin SC. Screening of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius, and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates obtained from small companion animals for antimicrobial resistance: a retrospective review of 749 isolates (2003-04) Vet. Dermatol. 2006;17:332–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2006.00536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinchbeck LR, Cole LK, Hillier A, Kowalski J, Rajala-Schultz PJ, Bannerman TL, York S. Genotypic relatedness of staphylococcal strains isolated from pustules and carriage sites in dogs with superficial bacterial folliculitis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2006;67:1337–1346. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.8.1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rich M. Staphylococci in animals: prevalence, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility, with an emphasis on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2005;62:98–105. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2005.11732694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt VM, Williams NJ, Pinchbeck G, Caroline E, Shaw CS, McEwan N, Dawson S, Nuttall T. Antimicrobial resistance and characterization of staphylococci isolated from healthy Labrador retrievers in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu A, Wakita Y, Nagase S, Okabe M, Koji T, Hayashi T, Nagase N, Sasaki A, Kawano J, Yamashita K, Takagi M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius isolated from healthy and diseased dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2001;63:357–360. doi: 10.1292/jvms.63.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simoons-Smit AM, Savelkoul PH, Stoof J, Starink TM, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJ. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between humans and domestic animals in a household. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000;19:150–152. doi: 10.1007/s100960050450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Box AT, Heck ME, Wannet WJ, Fluit AC. Human-to-dog transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Imerg. Infect. Dis. 2004;10:2235–2237. doi: 10.3201/eid1012.040387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanni M, Tognetti R, Pretti C, Crema F, Soldani G, Meucci V, Intorre L. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolated from dogs. Res. Vet. Sci. 2009;87:192–195. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infec. Dis. 2002;2:677–685. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weese JS. The canine and feline skin microbiome in health and disease. Vet. Dermatol. 2013;24:137–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo JH, Yoon JW, Lee SY, Park HM. High prevalence of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine pyoderma and otitis externa in veterinary teaching hospital. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 2010;20:798–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zdovc I, Ocepek M, Pirs T, Krt B, Pinter L. Microbiological features of Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp coagulans, isolated from dogs and possible misidentification with other canine coagulase-positive staphylococci. J. Vet. Med. B. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health. 2004;51:449–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
