Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2020 Jul 27;117(32):19599–19603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001776117

Elevated energy requirement of cone photoreceptors

Norianne T Ingram a,b, Gordon L Fain a,b, Alapakkam P Sampath b,1
PMCID: PMC7431031  PMID: 32719136

Significance

From recent measurements of mammalian cone physiology, we have calculated cone ATP utilization in darkness and in the light. We show that single cones consume ATP at a much higher rate than single rods, a difference that is greatly increased during the day. This high metabolic rate is especially prominent in the primate fovea, which may make this part of the human eye particularly sensitive to decreases in glucose uptake or other metabolic alterations.

Keywords: retina, photoreceptor, metabolism, degeneration, fovea

Abstract

We have used recent measurements of mammalian cone light responses and voltage-gated currents to calculate cone ATP utilization and compare it to that of rods. The largest expenditure of ATP results from ion transport, particularly from removal of Na+ entering outer segment light-dependent channels and inner segment hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, and from ATP-dependent pumping of Ca2+ entering voltage-gated channels at the synaptic terminal. Single cones expend nearly twice as much energy as single rods in darkness, largely because they make more synapses with second-order retinal cells and thus must extrude more Ca2+. In daylight, cone ATP utilization per cell remains high because cones never remain saturated and must continue to export Na+ and synaptic Ca2+ even in bright illumination. In mouse and human retina, rods greatly outnumber cones and consume more energy overall even in background light. In primates, however, the high density of cones in the fovea produces a pronounced peak of ATP utilization, which becomes particularly prominent in daylight and may make this part of the retina especially sensitive to changes in energy availability.


The open transduction channels and associated depolarized dark resting-membrane potential of rod photoreceptors makes their utilization of energy high in darkness but considerably lower even in moderate background light (1, 2). Energy expenditure could be much higher for cones, which continue to respond in bright illumination and make many more synapses onto second-order retinal cells. In most mammals, cones represent only a small fraction of the total number of photoreceptors, making direct measurements of ATP turnover with biochemical techniques (3) or oxygen consumption (1) problematic. Instead, we have used recently available voltage-clamp recordings from mouse cones in retinal slices (4) to calculate the rate of ATP utilization of the most energy-intensive cellular functions of the photoreceptors.

We have characterized the light-sensitive conductance in the cone outer segment and voltage-gated conductances in the cone inner segment, and because ion transport is by far the greatest component of the energy balance of photoreceptors (2) and of neurons in the brain (5, 6), we can use these physiological measurements to estimate mammalian cone ATP expenditure compared with rods. Our calculations show that ATP is consumed at a much higher rate in single cones, even in dim light but especially in bright daylight. Because rods are so much more numerous than cones in most mammals, the total ATP consumption of rods still exceeds that of cones. In the primate retina, however, the high density of cones in the fovea produces a large increase in energy utilization in the center of the retina. Several recent publications have implicated glucose transport or availability in the degeneration of cones (710), and it is possible that this high cone ATP requirement has some role in the progression of cone loss. Our observations may help explain why foveas are so rare among mammals, and why degenerating cones first lose their outer segments, probably at least in part to decrease the load of entering Na+.

Results and Discussion

To measure the light-dependent inward current of the cone outer segment, we recorded voltage-clamp current responses from both rods and cones in slices of mouse retina, using techniques described previously (SI Appendix ) (4, 11, 12). We used mice lacking connexin-36 gap junctions (Cx36−/−) to avoid any cross-contamination of rod and cone signals (13) and to achieve a more accurate space clamp of the cell. The light-dependent current is produced by Na+ and Ca2+ ions, which enter through cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels and are subsequently removed by ATP-dependent transport of Na+ via a Na+/K+ pump and by transport of Ca2+ by Na+/K+-Ca2+ (NCKX) exchange. From measurements of current responses (14), and from the voltages at corresponding light intensities (Fig. 1B), the reversal potential of the light response (4), and the current-voltage curve of the light-dependent conductance (4), we calculated the entry of Na+ into the outer segment as the sum of the Na+ entering the CNG channels plus the Na+ entry required to export Ca2+ via the exchanger (SI Appendix) (2). We assumed that the exchanger current was 10% of the total current (15) and divided the net Na+ entry by 3 to give the ATP consumed by the Na+/K+ ATPase. The exact value of the exchanger current has a relatively small effect on the total Na+ entry that we calculated (Eq. 6 in SI Appendix); doubling its fraction from 10% to 20% increases the Na+ influx by only 10%. Our calculation ignores the outward current carried by K+ through the CNG channels, which would lead us to underestimate the value of the Na+ influx. This effect is again small; we estimated this K+ current to be approximately 14% of the total current in darkness (SI Appendix) and to decrease as the cone hyperpolarizes toward the K+ equilibrium potential in the light.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Light responses and voltage-gated currents of mouse cones. (A and B) Cones from Cx36−/− retinas were illuminated with 4 s of steady 405-nm light at following intensities (in effective photons s−1 at the λmax value of either the M or S cone pigment): 4.4 × 104, 2.1 × 105, 8.1 × 105, 2.3 × 106, 4.8 × 106, 9.6 × 106, 2.4 × 107, 4.8 × 107, 6.6 × 107. (A) Mean current responses from four cones held at a membrane potential of −50 mV. (B) Mean voltage responses from seven cones to the same light-intensity steps as in A. Red bars indicate region of responses averaged to calculate steady-state response. (C) Amplitude of Ca2+ current to depolarizing voltage steps in darkness, measured in the presence of 200 μm niflumic acid in the external perfusion solution to block Ca2+-activated Cl currents (4). Photoreceptors were held at −70 mV and then stepped for 0.75 s to depolarizing potentials (−50 to 0 mV in 10-mV increments). Data show peak current and current measured just before termination of the voltage step (“steady”) plotted against holding potential. Symbols are mean ± SEM values for 14 cones and 9 rods. The horizontal line indicates zero current. (D) Mean ih current from 7 cones and 13 rods recorded as in Ingram et al. (4) by holding Vm at −30 mV and stepping for 400 ms to hyperpolarizing potentials (−25 mV to −85 mV in 10-mV increments). We included 25 mM tetraethylammonium and 10 μm isradipine in the external perfusion solution to block K+ and Ca2+ currents. The horizontal line indicates zero current.

We next considered ion influx through voltage-gated channels in the inner segment. Pumping of Ca2+ in the inner segment makes an important contribution to photoreceptor ATP utilization (2), because both rods and cones have resting inward Ca2+ currents (iCa) in darkness to support a continuous release of neurotransmitter (16). We routinely measured maximum values of iCa >50 pA in cones (Fig. 1C) (4); rod iCa was much smaller, with currents rarely exceeding 10 pA, consistent with the smaller size of the rod spherule compared with the cone pedicle and the single glutamate release site made by rods onto rod bipolar cells and horizontal cells. After directly measuring the voltage dependence of the current for both photoreceptor types (Fig. 1C), the influx of Ca2+ was interpolated at each light-induced change in membrane potential (Fig. 1B). Ca2+ is extruded from the inner segment by a plasma membrane ATPase rather than by Na+-dependent transport (1719), so ATP utilization can be estimated simply by dividing Ca2+ influx by 2.

Entering Ca2+ gates a Ca2+-activated Cl current, which can be almost as large in amplitude as the Ca2+ current (4). Because the mechanism of Cl transport is still unclear, no attempt was made to take it into consideration. As Fig. 1C shows, however, the Ca2+ current is much larger for cones than for rods, which should also be true of the Ca2+-activated Cl current. Therefore, including any ATP required to transport Cl would only augment the difference between the two kinds of photoreceptors and would not change the main conclusions of this study.

Both rods and cones also have a mixed Na+/K+ conductance provided by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels (16), which produce a current, ih (4). The rod and cone currents have a similar voltage dependence (Fig. 1D), as expected based on their predominantly HCN1 composition (2022). To calculate Na+ entry through these channels (SI Appendix), we used cone voltage responses (Fig. 1B), the relative permeability of the channels for Na+ (4), the ion concentration gradients, and the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz current equation (23). This calculation also includes the energy required to pump back the K+ leaving through HCN channels and other voltage-gated K+ channels (16), since the Na+/K+ ATPase produces homeostasis of both Na+ and K+ at steady-state, in darkness or in steady light.

In addition to ion influx, the most important additional contributor to ATP utilization is likely to be synthesis of cGMP by guanylyl cyclase (2). The rate of the cyclase is modulated by the guanylyl-cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs), which increase the production of cGMP as the outer segment Ca2+ concentration declines during illumination. We assumed that the Ca2+ concentration in mouse cones is directly proportional to the current through the CNG channels, as previous experiments have shown to be true for salamander rods (24) and cones (25); and because rods and cones use similar cyclases and GCAPs, we estimated cyclase activity from the known rod maximum and minimum cyclase rates and the dependence of the rate on Ca2+ concentration (SI Appendix) (26). Since cyclase is likely to be more highly expressed in cones by as much as a factor of 10 (27), we increased cone values by this factor. Nevertheless, the contribution of the cyclase even after this adjustment was relatively small compared with that required for ion pumping. Consequently, even substantial alterations in the assumptions we have made in calculating the ATP required for cGMP synthesis would be unlikely to have a significant effect on the energy balance of the photoreceptor.

Fig. 2 summarizes the intensity dependence of ATP utilization in rods (Fig. 2A) and cones (Fig. 2B) due to the CNG channels, HCN channels, Ca2+ extrusion, and cGMP production. From these components alone, cones require roughly 108 ATPs/s even in bright light (Fig. 2B). Contributions of pigment phosphorylation, synaptic vesicle synthesis, and protein synthesis are likely to be small in comparison. To phosphorylate bleached pigment, cones in mice use the same rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) as rods; this enzyme is expressed at a level of several percent of the pigment concentration and has a low turnover number (28). Even if all of the serines and threonines of each of the bleached pigment molecules were phosphorylated, which seems unlikely (29), the rate of ATP utilization would be unlikely to ever exceed 106 s−1. Regeneration of pigment is also unlikely to require >106 ATPs/s (SI Appendix), particularly for cones, which reisomerize chromophore at least in part via a light-dependent mechanism (30).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

ATP consumption in rods and cones in steady light. (A and B) Net ATP consumption for rods (A) and cones (B) as a function of light intensity in photons s−1, effective at the λmax of the rod or cone photopigments (SI Appendix). ATP consumption was then calculated from physiological measurements in Fig. 1 (SI Appendix), due to CNG channels (iCNG, black squares), HCN channels (ih, blue triangles), Ca2+ influx at synaptic terminals (iCa, cyan diamonds), guanylyl cyclase (GC, red circles), and sum of all four (total, purple stars). (C) Total ATP consumed for rods (red) and cones (black). Data are mean ± SEM.

Cones release synaptic transmitter in darkness at the rate of a few hundred vesicles per second (31), requiring on the order of 104 ATPs per vesicle (5, 6) for a total of ∼2 to 3 × 106 ATPs/s in darkness, decreasing in the light. Protein synthesis to renew the components of outer-segment membrane would require the synthesis of ∼10% of 108 protein molecules per outer segment per day, amounting to a few hundred protein molecules per second. Even including lipid synthesis, the ATP required to renew the outer segment is unlikely to be >105 s−1, much less than ion transport. The pumping of ions into endoplasmic reticulum and other intracellular vesicles is also unlikely to require high rates of ATP turnover comparable to those shown in Fig. 2. To our knowledge, there is no evidence that ion transport across intracellular vesicles or membranes must be maintained in the presence of a large leak of ions, as in the inner and outer segments.

Fig. 2C compares our calculations of the total energy used by rods and cones. In rods, ATP is consumed largely to remove Na+ from the outer segment and Ca2+ from the inner segment at a rate that is highest in darkness, decreasing precipitously even in moderate illumination as the rods approach saturation and nearly all of the CNG channels close. Because cones never saturate even in very bright light, they are much more expensive metabolically per cell. They use almost twofold more ATP in darkness because of the larger synaptic Ca2+ current, which in cones requires even more energy than removal of outer segment Na+. In addition, because cones are less sensitive than rods and do not saturate, ATP utilization remains high over a substantial part of the range of vision and never drops to below ∼108 ATPs/cone/s.

The consequence of this much higher energy requirement can be more clearly appreciated from the distribution of rods and cones in the retina. In mouse, rods greatly outnumber cones (32, 33) and consume much more ATP in darkness (Fig. 3A). As the ambient light intensity increases (Fig. 3 B and C), rod energy utilization decreases, but because rods are so much more abundant, they continue to consume more ATP than cones over the entire retina. This situation is dramatically different in primates, whose cones are physiologically quite similar to those of mouse (34, 35). Cones are again less numerous (36, 37) and less important consumers of ATP overall (Fig. 3D), but throughout most of the range of daily illumination, the high concentration of active cones in the very center of the retina produces a large and prominent peak of ATP consumption at the fovea (Fig. 3 E and F). Because the outer segments of primate cones are approximately three times longer than those of mouse cones (38, 39), they would be expected to have larger circulating currents and an even greater energy requirement than we have estimated. Humans, like most mammals, have many more rods than cones, but cluster cones together in the fovea to improve acuity at the center of gaze while keeping the total number of these more expensive cells to a minimum. This strategy reduces the overall consumption of ATP by the retina but has one disadvantage: it creates a small region with a particularly high energy requirement, which could make the fovea at especially high risk when glucose transport or availability is diminished (710).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

ATP consumption across retinal eccentricities. We used total ATP consumption for rods and cones from Fig. 2 together with measurements of the density of photoreceptors as a function of retinal eccentricity (mouse, 32; human, 36) to calculate the metabolic demand of the outer retina in mouse (AC) and human (DF) in three ambient light intensities: scotopic (darkness; 0 effective ϕ cell−1s−1) (A and D); mesopic (12,600 effective ϕ rod−1s−1 or 12,500 effective ϕ cone−1s−1) (B and E); and photopic (8.8 × 107 effective ϕ rod−1s−1 or 8.7 × 107 effective ϕ cone−1s−1) (C and F). The same values were used for cone currents, even though foveal cone outer segments are three times longer than mouse cones (38, 39) and likely have larger circulating currents. No attempt was made to take the difference in the number of synaptic ribbons in the pedicles between foveal and peripheral cones into consideration (40); these factors would only increase the difference in ATP consumption between rods and cones.

Our observations may provide some explanation for why a fovea is so rare among mammals and other vertebrate species. The metabolic cost associated with maintaining a high density of cones at the center of the visual field would make sense only if there were a selective pressure for particularly high visual acuity and temporal resolution. The high metabolic cost may also help explain why cones in diseased retinas first lose their outer segments (41, 42) and can then remain viable for a very long time as rounded cell bodies (7). These “dormant” cones have been proposed as potential targets for clinical intervention (9, 43). It is widely surmised that cones lose their outer segments to spare the energy to reform them. We think it more likely that outer segments are lost to prevent Na+ load from entry through CNG channels. An increase in intracellular Na+ can produce an increase in Ca2+, because the decrease in the Na+ gradient produces a decrease in Ca2+ export via NCKX exchange (44); an increase in Ca2+ in photoreceptors as in other cells can trigger apoptosis (45).

Materials and Methods

All experiments were performed in accordance with the rules and regulations of the NIH guidelines for research animals, as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California Los Angeles. Mice were kept under cyclic light (12-h on/12-h off) with ad libitum food and water in approved cages. Male and female mice were used in approximately equal numbers and were between 2 and 6 mo of age. To limit both the contribution of rod signals to cone responses and the spread of signal from a recorded cone, we recorded from mice that lacked the gap-junction protein connexin 36 (12). Cx36−/− mice were generated by David Paul from Harvard University (46) and obtained from Sam Wu of the Baylor College of Medicine. Rods and cones were voltage-clamped in dark-adapted retinal slices. Methods of recording and calculations of ATP turnover were similar to those described in our previous publications (2, 4, 11, 12). A more detailed description is given in the SI Appendix.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.2001776117.sapp.pdf (318.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Rikard Frederiksen and Jürgen Reingruber for helpful discussions, Greg Field for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Ekaterina Bikovtseva for technical assistance. This work was supported by National Eye Institute (NEI) Grant R01 EY001844 (to G.L.F.), T32 EY07026 (to A.P.S.), and R01 EY29817 (to A.P.S.); a Dissertation-Year Fellowship from the Graduate Division of UCLA (to N.T.I.); an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness USA to the UCLA Department of Ophthalmology; and NEI Core Grant EY00311 to the Jules Stein Eye Institute.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2001776117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

All the data in the paper are given in the figures except for the traces in Fig. 1 A and B. The data for these traces have been deposited and are available in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Dataverse (https://dataverse.ucla.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.25346/S6/R3JVO2).

References

  • 1.Linsenmeier R. A., Braun R. D., Oxygen distribution and consumption in the cat retina during normoxia and hypoxemia. J. Gen. Physiol. 99, 177–197 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Okawa H., Sampath A. P., Laughlin S. B., Fain G. L., ATP consumption by mammalian rod photoreceptors in darkness and in light. Curr. Biol. 18, 1917–1921 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dawis S. M. et al., Adenosine triphosphate utilization rates and metabolic pool sizes in intact cells measured by transfer of 18O from water. Biophys. J. 55, 79–99 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ingram N. T., Sampath A. P., Fain G. L., Membrane conductances of mouse cone photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 152, e201912520 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Attwell D., Laughlin S. B., An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 1133–1145 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sterling P., Laughlin S., Principles of Neural Design, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Punzo C., Kornacker K., Cepko C. L., Stimulation of the insulin/mTOR pathway delays cone death in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 44–52 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aït-Ali N. et al., Rod-derived cone viability factor promotes cone survival by stimulating aerobic glycolysis. Cell 161, 817–832 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang W. et al., Two-step reactivation of dormant cones in retinitis pigmentosa. Cell Rep. 15, 372–385 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng S. Y. et al., Altered photoreceptor metabolism in mouse causes late-stage age-related macular degeneration-like pathologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 13094–13104 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pahlberg J. et al., Voltage-sensitive conductances increase the sensitivity of rod photoresponses following pigment bleaching. J. Physiol. 595, 3459–3469 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ingram N. T., Sampath A. P., Fain G. L., Voltage-clamp recordings of light responses from wild-type and mutant mouse cone photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 151, 1287–1299 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fain G. L., Sampath A. P., Rod and cone interactions in the retina. F1000Res. 7, 657 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ingram N. T., Fain G. L., Sampath A. P., Step responses mouse Cx36 -/- cones, UCLA Dataverse. 10.25346/S6/R3JVO2. Deposited 3 June 2020. [DOI]
  • 15.Perry R. J., McNaughton P. A., Response properties of cones from the retina of the tiger salamander. J. Physiol. 433, 561–587 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Hook M. J., Nawy S., Thoreson W. B., Voltage- and calcium-gated ion channels of neurons in the vertebrate retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 72, 100760 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Krizaj D., Copenhagen D. R., Compartmentalization of calcium extrusion mechanisms in the outer and inner segments of photoreceptors. Neuron 21, 249–256 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Morgans C. W., El Far O., Berntson A., Wässle H., Taylor W. R., Calcium extrusion from mammalian photoreceptor terminals. J. Neurosci. 18, 2467–2474 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cia D. et al., Voltage-gated channels and calcium homeostasis in mammalian rod photoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 1468–1475 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moosmang S. et al., Cellular expression and functional characterization of four hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in cardiac and neuronal tissues. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 1646–1652 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Müller F. et al., HCN channels are expressed differentially in retinal bipolar cells and concentrated at synaptic terminals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 2084–2096 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Knop G. C. et al., Light responses in the mouse retina are prolonged upon targeted deletion of the HCN1 channel gene. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 2221–2230 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hodgkin A. L., Katz B., The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J. Physiol. 108, 37–77 (1949). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Matthews H. R., Fain G. L., The effect of light on outer segment calcium in salamander rods. J. Physiol. 552, 763–776 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sampath A. P., Matthews H. R., Cornwall M. C., Bandarchi J., Fain G. L., Light-dependent changes in outer segment free-Ca2+ concentration in salamander cone photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 113, 267–277 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Olshevskaya E. V. et al., The Y99C mutation in guanylyl cyclase-activating protein 1 increases intracellular Ca2+ and causes photoreceptor degeneration in transgenic mice. J. Neurosci. 24, 6078–6085 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takemoto N., Tachibanaki S., Kawamura S., High cGMP synthetic activity in carp cones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 11788–11793 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kennedy M. J. et al., Multiple phosphorylation of rhodopsin and the in vivo chemistry underlying rod photoreceptor dark adaptation. Neuron 31, 87–101 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vishnivetskiy S. A. et al., Regulation of arrestin binding by rhodopsin phosphorylation level. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 32075–32083 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morshedian A. et al., Light-driven regeneration of cone visual pigments through a mechanism involving RGR opsin in Muller Glial cells. Neuron 102, 1172–1183.e5 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Choi S. Y. et al., Encoding light intensity by the cone photoreceptor synapse. Neuron 48, 555–562 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jeon C.-J., Strettoi E., Masland R. H., The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 18, 8936–8946 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Volland S., Esteve-Rudd J., Hoo J., Yee C., Williams D. S., A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula. PLoS One 10, e0125631 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yagi T., Macleish P. R., Ionic conductances of monkey solitary cone inner segments. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 656–665 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baudin J., Angueyra J. M., Sinha R., Rieke F., S-cone photoreceptors in the primate retina are functionally distinct from L and M cones. eLife 8, e39166 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Curcio C. A., Sloan K. R. Jr., Packer O., Hendrickson A. E., Kalina R. E., Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: Individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236, 579–582 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Østerberg G., Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Opthalmologica (Copenhagen) (suppl. 6), 1–103 (1935). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dowling J. E., Foveal receptors of the monkey retina: Fine structure. Science 147, 57–59 (1965). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carter-Dawson L. D., LaVail M. M., Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. J. Comp. Neurol. 188, 245–262 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chun M. H., Grünert U., Martin P. R., Wässle H., The synaptic complex of cones in the fovea and in the periphery of the macaque monkey retina. Vision Res. 36, 3383–3395 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barone I., Novelli E., Strettoi E., Long-term preservation of cone photoreceptors and visual acuity in rd10 mutant mice exposed to continuous environmental enrichment. Mol. Vis. 20, 1545–1556 (2014). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin B., Masland R. H., Strettoi E., Remodeling of cone photoreceptor cells after rod degeneration in rd mice. Exp. Eye Res. 88, 589–599 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Busskamp V. et al., Genetic reactivation of cone photoreceptors restores visual responses in retinitis pigmentosa. Science 329, 413–417 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cervetto L., Lagnado L., Perry R. J., Robinson D. W., McNaughton P. A., Extrusion of calcium from rod outer segments is driven by both sodium and potassium gradients. Nature 337, 740–743 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Power M. et al., Cellular mechanisms of hereditary photoreceptor degeneration—Focus on cGMP. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 74, 100772 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Deans M. R., Volgyi B., Goodenough D. A., Bloomfield S. A., Paul D. L., Connexin36 is essential for transmission of rod-mediated visual signals in the mammalian retina. Neuron 36, 703–712 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.2001776117.sapp.pdf (318.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All the data in the paper are given in the figures except for the traces in Fig. 1 A and B. The data for these traces have been deposited and are available in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Dataverse (https://dataverse.ucla.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.25346/S6/R3JVO2).


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES