Skip to main content
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses logoLink to Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
. 2020 Jul 2;14(5):515–523. doi: 10.1111/irv.12744

Recent influenza activity in tropical Puerto Rico has become synchronized with mainland US

Gabriela Paz–Bailey 1,, Talia M Quandelacy 1, Laura E Adams 1, Sonja J Olsen 2, Lenee Blanton 2, Jorge L Munoz-Jordan 1, Matthew Lozier 1, Luisa I Alvarado 3, Michael A Johansson 1
PMCID: PMC7431640  PMID: 32614504

Abstract

Background

We used data from the Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System (SEDSS) to describe influenza trends in southern Puerto Rico during 2012‐2018 and compare them to trends in the United States.

Methods

Patients with fever onset ≤ 7 days presenting were enrolled. Nasal/oropharyngeal swabs were tested for influenza A and B viruses by PCR. Virologic data were obtained from the US World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Laboratories System and the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS). We compared influenza A and B infections identified from SEDSS and WHO/NREVSS laboratories reported by US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) region using time series decomposition methods, and analysed coherence of climate and influenza trends by region.

Results

Among 23,124 participants, 9% were positive for influenza A and 5% for influenza B. Influenza A and B viruses were identified year‐round, with no clear seasonal patterns from 2012 to 2015 and peaks in December‐January in 2016‐2017 and 2017‐2018 seasons. Influenza seasons in HHS regions were relatively synchronized in recent years with the seasons in Puerto Rico. We observed high coherence between absolute humidity and influenza A and B virus in HHS regions. In Puerto Rico, coherence was much lower in the early years but increased to similar levels to HHS regions by 2017‐2018.

Conclusions

Influenza seasons in Puerto Rico have recently become synchronized with seasons in US HHS regions. Current US recommendations are for everyone 6 months and older to receive influenza vaccination by the end of October seem appropriate for Puerto Rico.

Keywords: COVID-19, influenza, Puerto Rico, synchrony, trends, United States

1. BACKGROUND

Influenza is a significant public health problem globally. Seasonal influenza has a high disease burden, reducing school attendance, increasing worker absenteeism and impacting daily productivity. 1 Since 2010, CDC estimates that influenza is associated with between 9.3‐49 million illnesses, 140 000‐960 000 hospitalizations and 12 000‐79 000 deaths each year in the United States (US). 2 Though antivirals treat infection, vaccination remains the primary tool to prevent influenza‐associated morbidity and mortality. 3 The US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine annual influenza vaccination for individuals, aged ≥6‐months who do not have contraindications. 4 Influenza immunization programmes must consider disease seasonality to most effectively use immunization. 5 As a US Territory, Puerto Rico follows the same seasonal influenza vaccination recommendations as the continental US. However, given its tropical climate and distant geographic location, Puerto Rico's seasonality may differ compared with the continental United States. This difference may impact public health measures, for example when to recommend the annual influenza vaccine in Puerto Rico.

In high‐income temperate countries, influenza has been well described. Most seasonal epidemics in temperate regions occur during the winter months, between November and March in the Northern Hemisphere and between April and September in the Southern Hemisphere. 6 These seasonal patterns are thought to be driven by annual changes in climate, contact rates, human immunity and other factors. 1 , 7 , 8 Some tropical and subtropical regions experience annual epidemics coinciding with local rainy seasons, 9 whereas others have semi‐annual epidemics or year‐round influenza activity without well‐defined influenza seasons. 10 , 11 Influenza seasonality in tropical and subtropical regions is less understood. 9

Few studies examined influenza in Puerto Rico, and none examine Puerto Rico influenza trends in relation to patterns in the continental United States. Comparing seasonal patterns of influenza in Puerto Rico to seasonality in the continental United States would help inform immunization programmes, surveillance and mitigation measures on the island. We analysed data from enhanced acute febrile illness (AFI) surveillance sites in southern Puerto Rico during 2012 to 2018 to define typical periods of influenza activity. To better understand the temporal dynamics of influenza epidemics and possible drivers, we used time series decomposition methods to isolate seasonal oscillations of influenza epidemics in Puerto Rico and to compare them to influenza epidemics in US Health and Human Service [HHS] regions (Figure S1). We also explored coherence between climate and influenza trends for Puerto Rico and HHS regions, to determine whether climatic differences explained differences in influenza trends.

2. METHODS

2.1. Sentinel enhanced dengue surveillance system

The Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System (SEDSS) 12 recruits febrile patients presenting at emergency departments (ED) and one outpatient clinic in Ponce, Puerto Rico. SEDSS started in May 2012 at Saint Luke's Episcopal Hospital, a 427 inpatient bed tertiary care hospital that receives ~60 000 patients/year, and is the regional paediatric referral hospital for the Ponce and Mayaguez (~500 000 residents) Health Districts. The Outpatient Acute Care Clinic (2016‐present) services ~20 000 patients/year. Guayama Menonita Hospital (2013‐2015) is a 161‐bed secondary care hospital site that receives ~35 000 patients per year from southeastern Puerto Rico (~50 000 residents), and participated in SEDSS from 2013‐2015. The municipality of Ponce has a population of 133 191 persons for 2018. The age distribution is 5% are ≤5 years, 20% 5‐18 years, 22% ≥65 years (https://www.census.gov/).

Patients presenting to the SEDSS sites were queried for current fever (body temperature of ≥38.0°C [oral] or ≥38.5°C [axillary]), or having reported a history of fever within the last 7 days. Those responding positively for fever were enrolled. Blood, urine, and combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from enrolled patients, and diagnostic testing was performed. Upper respiratory tract specimens were tested for influenza A and B viruses, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), coronavirus, parainfluenza viruses and human metapneumovirus by real‐time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) as previously described. 13 , 14 , 15 For each respiratory pathogen, a positive result was defined as nucleic acid detected by PCR (cycle threshold cut–off 37.0). SEDSS participants provided demographic, history of exposure and clinical data during enrolment interview.

All enrolled patients provided informed consent. The Ponce Medical School Foundation and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ethics committees reviewed and approved the SEDSS study protocol.

2.2. US influenza viral surveillance

Virologic surveillance data from the 40th week of 2012 to the end of 2018 were obtained from the US World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Laboratories and the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS). The WHO Collaborating Laboratories System is maintained by CDC’s Influenza Division and the NREVSS is maintained by CDC’s Division of Viral Diseases. The data included the total number of respiratory specimens tested, and the number positive for influenza types A and B viruses each week. Data were collected, analysed and aggregated nationally and by HHS regions (Figure S1).

2.3. Data analyses

We compared the number of confirmed influenza A and B cases in SEDSS to virologic surveillance data collected by US WHO and NREVSS laboratories by HHS region. Weekly numbers of influenza cases combined influenza A and B virus types. The reporting period for each influenza seasons begin during week 40 and ends week 39 of the following year. For weekly case time series in Puerto Rico and HHS regions, the peak week was the week with the maximum number of positive cases. To compare the difference in timing (in weeks) of influenza epidemics between SEDSS and HHS regions, we used continuous wavelet transforms to isolate the seasonal component of the time series data. First, case count time series were normalized by logging the weekly case counts and standardizing by the mean and standard deviation of the time series. The seasonal time series for each region was reconstructed using Morlet wavelet decomposition to extract the major seasonal component (period: 40‐56 weeks) from the normalized case count time series. This range allowed us to capture fluctuations around the 52‐week yearly cycle. Then, we calculated coherence and phase difference analyses between the seasonal influenza A and B component from SEDSS to the seasonal influenza component of each HHS region. 16 Coherence estimated the relatedness of the time series, with a coherence of 1 indicating the time series are exactly identical though possibly lagged, while a coherence of 0 indicates no association between the two time series. Seasonal epidemics in two regions were considered to be in phase (ie, occurring at the same time), if there was no difference between their phases (ie relative timing in weeks). Relative to the reference location, Puerto Rico, a positive phase difference would indicate that seasonal epidemics occurred earlier in Puerto Rico than the matched HHS region. In contrast, a negative phase difference indicated that seasonal epidemics were later in Puerto Rico than in the HHS Region. Results based on peak timing were confirmed by the wavelet phase analysis, which considers the entire epidemic cycle. 17

To explore if differences in seasonality between Puerto Rico and HHS regions were due to differences in climate, we obtained regional climate data (absolute humidity, temperature and precipitation) from 2012 to 2018 from the North American Regional Reanalysis data set from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 18 Daily climate data were temporally and spatially aggregated to weekly means for each HHS region and Puerto Rico. Weekly mean time series data were normalized. In order to analyse the possible relationship to climate, we extended the timeframe considered for the seasonal component to 40‐80 weeks to include potential climatic trends that might occur outside the typical seasonal periodicity. For each region, we used the Morlet wavelet decomposition to extract the major seasonal component (period: 40‐80 weeks) for weekly influenza cases and the weekly mean absolute humidity, temperature and precipitation.

2.4. Role of funding source

The US CDC funded the study, and participated in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation and preparation of the manuscript. All authors had full access to study data, and all authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

3. RESULTS

Of 78 822 febrile patients presenting to SEDSS sites during 2012‐2018, 28 280 were offered participation and 23 124 (82%) participants enrolled in SEDSS. Among participants, 52% were female, and 60% were aged ≤17 years. Half of the participants were from the Ponce municipality, and most (72%) presented within 3 days of illness onset. While 82% were sent home after evaluation and treatment, 16% had hospital admittance. From 2012‐2013, 20% of the total enrollees were recruited, 20% in 2014‐2015, 43% in 2016‐2017 and 17% in 2018. Participants’ clinical and demographic characteristics did not change between years (Table 1). Overall, 14% of participants were positive for influenza; 9% for influenza A and 5% for influenza B viruses. Although there were no differences by gender, the percentage of participants with positive results for influenza A or B viruses differed by age (P < .001) and days after symptom onset (P < .001; Table 2).

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants by year of recruitment, Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System, Ponce, Puerto Rico, 2012‐2018

Participant Characteristics Overall 2012‐2013 2014‐2015 2016‐2017 2018
N % N % N % N % N %
Gender
Female 11 924 51.6 2282 49.6 2383 50.0 5264 53.5 1995 51.0
Male 11 200 48.4 2320 50.4 2388 50.1 4578 46.5 1914 49.0
Age
<1 y 1997 8.6 354 7.7 535 11.2 790 8.0 318 8.1
1‐5 y 6395 27.7 1128 24.5 1582 33.2 2483 25.2 1202 30.8
6‐17 y 5430 23.5 1350 29.3 1141 23.9 2000 20.3 939 24.0
18‐64 y 7874 34.1 1513 32.9 1234 25.9 3923 39.9 1204 30.8
65 + y 1428 6.2 257 5.6 279 5.9 646 6.6 246 6.3
Municipality of residence
Ponce 11 747 50.8 2021 43.9 2075 43.5 5608 57.0 2043 52.3
Juana Diaz 2215 9.6 407 8.8 413 8.7 1020 10.4 375 9.6
Peñuelas 2076 9.0 161 3.5 219 4.6 1150 11.7 546 14.0
Guayama 1289 5.6 590 12.8 676 14.2 15 0.2 8 0.2
Villalba 1088 4.7 236 5.1 211 4.4 484 4.9 157 4.0
Other municipality 4709 20.4 1187 25.8 1177 24.7 1565 15.9 780 20.0
Days post‐onset of symptoms
<3 d 16 632 71.9 2911 63.3 3784 79.3 6987 71.0 2950 75.5
3‐7 d 6416 27.8 1655 36.0 986 20.7 2852 29.0 923 23.6
8 + d 76 0.3 36 0.8 1 0.0 3 0.0 36 0.9
Disposition outcome
Sent home 19 051 82.4 3192 69.4 3724 78.1 8665 88.0 3470 88.8
Admitted 3707 16.0 1378 29.9 1024 21.5 964 9.8 341 8.7
Transferred 171 0.7 14 0.3 14 0.3 109 1.1 34 0.9
Died 28 0.1 12 0.3 4 0.1 10 0.1 2 0.1
Other 167 0.7 6 0.1 5 0.1 94 1.0 62 1.6
Total 23 124 100 4602 100 4771 100 9842 100 3909 100

Table 2.

Characteristics of participants with Influenza A and Influenza B, Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System, Ponce, Puerto Rico, 2012‐2018

Participant Characteristics Total All Influenza Influenza A Influenza B
N n % n % n %
Gender
Female 11 924 1619 13.6 1051 8.8 568 4.8
Male 11 200 1595 14.2 985 8.8 610 5.5
Age
<1 y 1997 128 6.4 91 4.6 37 1.9
1‐5 y 6395 680 10.6 468 7.3 212 3.3
6‐17 y 5430 1031 19.0 517 9.5 514 9.5
18‐64 y 7874 1194 15.2 846 10.7 348 4.4
65 + y 1428 181 12.7 114 8.0 67 4.7
Days post‐onset of symptoms
<3 d 16 632 2427 14.6 1635 9.8 792 4.8
3‐7 d 6416 778 12.1 394 6.1 384 6.0
8 + d 76 9 11.8 7 9.2 2 2.6
Disposition outcome
Sent home 19 051 2864 15.0 1800 9.5 1064 5.6
Admitted 3707 320 8.6 217 5.9 103 2.8
Transferred 171 9 5.3 6 3.5 3 1.8
Died 28 3 10.7 3 10.7 . .
Other 167 18 10.8 10 6.0 8 4.8
Total 23 124 3214 13.9 2036 8.8 1178 5.1

We compared the time series and peak timing of overall influenza and type‐specific patterns in Puerto Rico to the HHS regions. In Puerto Rico (SEDSS), influenza peaks varied substantially between 2013 and 2018 (Figure 1A). Specifically, influenza A virus had an atypical summer peak in 2013, but had subsequent peaks in the winter months (December, January and February) with similar timing to those in the HHS regions (Figure 1B). In the HHS regions, influenza peaked consistently during the winter months (December and January) throughout the study period. For influenza B virus, long‐term patterns in SEDSS were less clear with some peaks in the summer (2016) and others in the winter months (2017‐2018). Only 2017‐2018 appeared to be closely aligned with HHS regions, where influenza B virus peaked in the winter and early spring (January to March; Figure 1C). The seasonal components from the time series confirmed these trends (Figure S2A‐C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A, Number of influenza cases overall (1A‐C) and by type in the Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System (SEDSS), Southern Puerto Rico (PR) and US HHS regions (US WHO/NRVESS), (B). Coherence (1D‐F) comparing the similarity between the influenza patterns in the US HHS regions with SEDSS (PR), and (C). Phase differences (1G‐I) comparing the timing of SEDSS (PR) influenza seasonal epidemics to those in each of the US HHS regions. Seasonal decomposition was defined as a 40‐ to 56‐wk period. Colour lines refer to the comparisons of the weekly seasonal time series of SEDSS (PR) to each US HHS region (PR‐HHS). For coherence, the dashed line at 1 refers to identical seasonal patterns of the US HHS region and the SEDSS (PR), whereas 0 refers to no association of the two time series. For phase differences, negative values indicate the seasonal pattern of SEDSS (PR) influenza cases is behind US HHS regions, and positive values indicate the seasonal pattern of SEDSS (PR) cases is ahead of US HHS regions

We performed coherence and phase analyses to estimate the relatedness and relative timing (in weeks) of the influenza time series in SEDSS, Puerto Rico to those in each of the US HHS regions. Comparing SEDSS to the HHS regions for overall influenza, there was low coherence during 2013‐2015, and high coherence in 2016 (Figure 1D). Similarly, influenza A virus in SEDSS had high coherence with influenza A virus in each HHS time series in later years (Figure 1E). Influenza B virus coherence differed from A. Influenza B virus coherence was higher in the early years, decreasing to roughly 0.40‐0.45 in 2015‐2016, then increased in 2016‐2017 (Figure 1F). The average annual coherence of influenza was highest when comparing US HHS Region 2 (0.66) and US HHS Region 9 (0.67). It should be noted that US HHS region 2 includes Puerto Rico (along with the US Virgin Island, New York, and New Jersey). The southern states are represented in US HHS region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee), but this region had lower coherence with Puerto Rico (0.52), suggesting they do not have more similar influenza patterns (Table S1). Similar coherence patterns are also observed when looking at influenza A and B.

From the phase analyses, the seasonal components of the overall time series showed a synchronization between SEDSS and the HHS regions across the study period (Figure 1G‐I). From 2013 to 2015, the SEDSS seasonal influenza patterns lagged behind the HHS regions by as much as 12‐18 weeks. However, this pattern inverted in 2016, after which the seasonal patterns in SEDSS led the patterns in the HHS regions by 0‐5 weeks. Influenza A and B viruses showed distinct patterns when comparing SEDSS to HHS regions. The sporadic and off‐season dynamics of influenza A virus in SEDSS in 2013‐2014 led to a high degree of asynchrony with the HHS regions. However, those dynamics quickly changed beginning in 2014, with seasonal influenza A having similar timing with HHS regions in early 2016 and onward. Seasonal influenza B virus patterns in Puerto Rico lagged behind the HHS regions by 2‐10 weeks until the 2016‐2017 season at which point they preceded HHS regions by 0‐4 weeks, showing better synchrony with the HHS regions.

To investigate possible climatic drivers of influenza A and B epidemics patterns within each geographic region, we assessed the coherence and phase differences between location‐specific climate variables and type‐specific influenza incidence (Figure 2A‐I). In terms of the overall time series climatic trends, Puerto Rico was consistently warmer and more humid over the time series compared with weekly average absolute humidity and temperature in HHS regions (Figure 2A‐B). In contrast, precipitation varied greatly across all regions. Some HHS regions had peak rainfall in distinctly different seasons compared with Puerto Rico (Figure 2C). Over the 40‐ to 80‐week component of the time series, we observed high coherence (range: 0.61‐0.99) between absolute humidity and influenza A and B viruses within the HHS regions (Figure 2D, G). However, this pattern was markedly different in Puerto Rico. Influenza A virus coherence was much lower in the early years, but by the 2017‐2018 season, coherence increased to similar levels as the HHS regions (range: 0.18‐0.94). Meanwhile, influenza B virus coherence was higher early in the time series, decreasing in 2015‐2016, and increasing in late 2016, but never having the higher coherence estimates observed in the HHS regions (range: 0.27‐0.72). Similar patterns were observed for coherence between mean weekly temperature and influenza A and B viruses (Figure 2E, H). Coherence between precipitation and influenza varied substantially for the HHS regions and Puerto Rico, but did not have consistently high coherence for the SEDSS Puerto Rico data (Figure 2F‐I). The phase difference analyses showed a high degree of asynchrony of influenza patterns in Puerto Rico and patterns for climate variables (Figure S3C‐D). The seasonal precipitation patterns lagged behind influenza A virus trends in SEDSS by 20 weeks, while absolute humidity and temperature patterns led by about 25‐30 weeks (Figure S3C). For influenza B virus, precipitation, absolute humidity and temperature seasonal components were ahead of the influenza B patterns by 15‐30 weeks (Figure S3D). The seasonal wavelet decomposition for each HHS region showed that influenza peaked when temperature and absolute humidity were low (Figure S4A‐E and K‐O for influenza A and Figure S5A‐E, K‐O for influenza B). For each HHS region, influenza patterns consistently lagged approximately 30 weeks for influenza A and 20 weeks influenza B compared with temperature and absolute humidity patterns (Figure S4F‐J, P‐T, S5F‐J, P‐T).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Trends in absolute humidity (A), temperature (B) and precipitation (C) in Puerto Rico and US HHS regions (US WHO/NRVESS) and annual coherence for influenza A (D, E, F) and B (G, H, I). Seasonal decomposition was defined as a 40‐ to 80‐wk period. Colour lines refer to the comparisons of the weekly seasonal time series of SEDSS, Puerto Rico to the weekly seasonal pattern for each climate variable. For coherence, the dashed line at 1 refers to identical seasonal patterns of SEDSS and the climate variables, whereas 0 refers to no association of the two time series

4. DISCUSSION

This is the first study comparing seasonal influenza trends in Puerto Rico to trends in the US HHS regions, and we found influenza trends between HHS regions and SEDSS, Puerto Rico varied over time but increased in synchrony in recent years. We observed distinct synchronization patterns by influenza virus types, showing different dynamics for each type over the time series. For influenza A, the predominant type in Puerto Rico and the HHS regions, the seasonal incidence pattern in Puerto Rico greatly differed from the HHS regions in 2012‐2014, but synchronized beginning in 2015‐2016. Influenza B cases in Puerto Rico had more consistent seasonality and also exhibited increased synchrony starting in the 2016‐2017 season. Relative to influenza in the HHS regions, both virus types in Puerto Rico switched from irregular, asynchronous seasonal epidemics, generally following those in the rest of the United States, to synchronous epidemics, preceding the seasonal epidemics in the continental United States.

One explanation of the seasonal differences between Puerto Rico and the continental United States may be the geographic differences in climate. Consistent with other studies, we found that influenza incidence in HHS regions had high coherence with humidity and temperature. In contrast, Puerto Rico lacked the high coherence with climate observed among the HHS regions, and only had higher coherence during the most recent influenza seasons. The absence of high coherence between influenza peaks and temperature and humidity in Puerto Rico may be because higher year‐round humidity and temperatures have less variation than in temperate regions. In vitro and animal model studies of influenza transmission showed low absolute humidity favours virus survival and aerosolized transmission 19 , 20 and epidemiological studies showed lower humidity is associated with the onset of influenza epidemics in the United States. 21 Increased proximity between susceptible and infected hosts associated with cold weather is also frequently suggested as an important driver of influenza seasonality. 8 Seasonal variation in host immunity may also explain the seasonality of influenza in temperate countries. Studies also suggest an association between increased influenza activity and the rainy season in several tropical populations, 22 but seasonal precipitation also had low coherence with influenza activity in Puerto Rico. While climatic conditions may likely affect influenza transmission in some locations, humidity, temperature and precipitation are not the main drivers of influenza in Puerto Rico. Other climatic factors not examined here, or other socio‐demographic factors may be more important drivers, though this needs further examination.

Perhaps, the most striking result of our study was the increased synchronization with HHS regions during recent years for both influenza virus types. As described above, the climate analysis suggests this synchrony was not driven by climate alone and likely influenced by other factors 23 including travel and global and US influenza viral introductions into Puerto Rico. For instance, a previous study suggested that human mobility has synchronized epidemics among highly connected populations in the United States, with influenza viruses spreading from populous to less populous locations. 17 It is possible that contact rates at these larger scales may be particularly important to the seasonal patterns of influenza in smaller populations, or for locations that are characterized by less climatic variability, like Puerto Rico. In such cases, seasonal variability in the volume of infected individuals entering a population (like migration from the United States to Puerto Rico during the winter) may exceed any climate‐mediated seasonality. 24 Analysis of air passenger data and seasonal patterns may help investigate this hypothesis. The time lag of several weeks relative to HHS regions suggests that recent epidemics in Puerto Rico may lead rather than follow those in HHS regions; however, the different geographical scale may complicate this relationship. The SEDSS catchment area is just one region of Puerto Rico, and much smaller than any HHS region. Recent work found that the shape of epidemics varies across different geographies, such that even introductions from another location may result in epidemics with earlier sharper peaks than the source location. 25 Other studies found highly synchronized epidemics in Australia coincided with years of emergent antigenically distinct subtypes, and synchrony across the continent was a function of global introductions of influenza viruses paired with domestic connectivity. 26 Our study found that coherence was higher for certain HHS regions compared with others. The high coherence associated with US HHS Region 9 may be due to the fact that Region 9 is comprised of southwestern states (Arizona, California, Nevada), but also Pacific Island states (Hawaii) and territories (American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau), and these Pacific Island areas may have similar patterns to Puerto Rico. Similar coherence patterns are also observed when looking at influenza A and B. This may be because even though southern states have warmer and more humid temperatures, they still experience seasonal fluctuations in temperature and humidity that are closer to temperate states compared with tropical locations such as Puerto Rico, and other tropical areas, such as Hawaii or American Samoa.

The annual coherence of influenza B increased from 2015 to the end of 2018. This increase was observed across all comparisons of US HHS Regions and SEDSS in Puerto Rico. Though we did not have data on influenza B lineages, there is evidence from other genomic analyses that the influenza B Victoria lineage had experienced high genetic reassortment in 2016, 27 which may in part explain the increase in coherence and phase of the influenza B strains across the region. Increases in B Victoria (as opposed to B Yamagata) can also be seen over time in CDC’s virological surveillance from the 2016 to 2017 seasons onward. 28

This investigation leveraged a large study with consistent recruiting and diagnostic testing over multiple influenza seasons, yet still is subject to several limitations. First, the patient population was limited to two sentinel hospitals and one outpatient clinic in southern Puerto Rico. Because healthcare‐seeking behaviours may differ between populations served by different hospitals, the observed percentages of patients with a respiratory virus may not be representative of all Puerto Rican health facilities. Second, the 6.5 seasons captured through SEDSS are only a snapshot of a long history of influenza in Puerto Rico. For example, it is unclear if the seasons without a regular peak seen, such as those in the earlier years of the study, were common prior to 2012 or if earlier epidemics were more consistent with HHS regions. It is possible that there are cycles working on larger time scales that contribute to sporadic asynchrony or sporadic synchrony. We also could not account for vaccine effects. While Puerto Rico generally has lower influenza vaccination rates compared with US states, 29 we did not capture vaccination information as part of the surveillance systems and therefore, could not assess its impact the local dynamics. Data on influenza A virus subtypes or B virus lineages were not available for this analysis. We did not examine travel between Puerto Rico and the mainland United States or other locations, but are components that may contribute substantially to influenza dynamics in Puerto Rico. Future studies could include phylogenetic analysis to confirm the timing of influenza strains circulating in the continental United States compared with Puerto Rico. HHS region two includes data from Puerto Rico, which may result in over‐estimating associations with that region; however, the patterns observed for this region were similar to others. We did not have data on influenza trends for all of Puerto Rico and were unable determine if trends in Ponce are similar to the island wide trends. Finally, few participants were 65 years of age and older, and possibly under‐estimating the number of infections in Puerto Rico. 29

Our study highlights the poorly understood complexity of influenza in tropical regions where climate is not a strong driver of seasonal dynamics. It also broadens our understanding of the relationship between influenza trends in the continental United States and Puerto Rico, and the role of climate. Currently in the United States, influenza vaccines are recommended to be received before the end of October. These recommendations would not have been ideal for Puerto Rico in the early study years. Influenza trends in Puerto Rico will need to be continuously monitored to better understand if these dynamics change again, and to ensure that interventions, like vaccinations, are implemented appropriately for influenza in Puerto Rico.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

GPB designed the study, contributed to the analyses, participated in the interpretation of results and wrote the first draft of the paper. TQ conducted the wavelet decomposition and phase difference analyses and co‐wrote the paper. LA conducted the descriptive analyses and contributed to the final draft of the paper. SO, LB and ML helped interpret results and edited the final draft of the paper. JM supervised the laboratory testing and reviewed the final draft of the paper. LIA is the principal investigator for the enhanced surveillance system, helped interpret study results and reviewed the final draft of the paper. MJ oversaw the analyses strategy, helped interpret study results and edited the final draft of the paper. All authors revised the draft paper critically for important intellectual content, provided final approval of the version to be published and are accountable for all aspects of the work with regards to accuracy and integrity.

DISCLAIMER

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Supporting information

FigS1‐S5

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge funding provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We would like to thank the contribution of all study participants. We would also like to acknowledge the work of Olga Lorenzi and her support to this project.

Paz–Bailey G, Quandelacy TM, Adams LE, et al. Recent influenza activity in tropical Puerto Rico has become synchronized with mainland US. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2020;14:515–523. 10.1111/irv.12744

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/irv.12744

Footnotes

1

Region 1 includes: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Region 2 includes: New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Region 3 includes: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Region 4 includes: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Region 5 includes: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Region 6 includes: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Region 7 includes: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska. Region 8 includes: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Region 9 includes: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Common wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau. Region 10 includes: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tamerius J, Nelson MI, Zhou SZ, Viboud C, Miller MA, Alonso WJ. Global influenza seasonality: reconciling patterns across temperate and tropical regions. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:439‐445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Disease burden of influenza [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar. 18]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
  • 3. Samaan G, McPherson M, Partridge J. A review of the evidence to support influenza vaccine introduction in countries and areas of WHO's Western Pacific Region. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Broder KR, Walter EB, Fry AM, Jernigan DB. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices‐United States, 2018–19 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018;67:1‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Barr IG, McCauley J, Cox N, et al. Epidemiological, antigenic and genetic characteristics of seasonal influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B influenza viruses: basis for the WHO recommendation on the composition of influenza vaccines for use in the 2009–2010 northern hemisphere season. Vaccine. 2010;28:1156‐1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cox NJ, Subbarao K. Global epidemiology of influenza: past and present. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:407‐421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lipsitch M, Viboud C. Influenza seasonality: lifting the fog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3645‐3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lofgren E, Fefferman NH, Naumov YN, Gorski J, Naumova EN. Influenza seasonality: underlying causes and modeling theories. J Virol. 2007;81:5429‐5436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Moura FE. Influenza in the tropics. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:415‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chiu SS, Chan KH, Chen H, et al. Virologically confirmed population‐based burden of hospitalization caused by influenza A and B among children in Hong Kong. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1016‐1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Durand LO, Cheng PY, Palekar R, et al. Timing of influenza epidemics and vaccines in the American tropics, 2002–2008, 2011–2014. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016;10:170‐175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tomashek KM, Rivera A, Torres‐Velasquez B, et al. Enhanced surveillance for fatal dengue‐like acute febrile illness in Puerto Rico, 2010–2012. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Paulino RDS, Benega MA, Santos KCDO, et al. Differential diagnosis of respiratory viruses by using real time RT‐PCR methodology. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013;55:432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dare R, Zhu Y, Williams JV, Griffin M, Talbot HK. Detection of influenza by real time RT‐PCR is not affected by delays in respiratory specimen processing. J Med Virol. 2016;88:1891‐1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. World Health Organization . The Use of PCR in the Surveillance and Diagnosis of Influenza [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. [cited 2019 Apr. 16]; Available from: https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/final_who_pcr__meeting_report_aug_2011_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Torrence C, Compo GP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1998;79:61‐78. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Viboud C, Bjornstad ON, Smith DL, Simonsen L, Miller MA, Grenfell BT. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science. 2006;312:447‐451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration . Earth System Research Laboratory's Physical Sciences Division (PSD). [cited 2019 Apr. 16]; Available from: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/
  • 19. Hood AM. Infectivity of influenza virus aerosols. J Hyg. 1963;61:331‐335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lowen AC, Mubareka S, Steel J, Palese P. Influenza virus transmission is dependent on relative humidity and temperature. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:1470‐1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shaman J, Kohn M. Absolute humidity modulates influenza survival, transmission, and seasonality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3243‐3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chew FT, Doraisingham S, Ling AE, Kumarasinghe G, Lee BW. Seasonal trends of viral respiratory tract infections in the tropics. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;121:121‐128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cauchemez S, Valleron AJ, Boelle PY, Flahault A, Ferguson NM. Estimating the impact of school closure on influenza transmission from Sentinel data. Nature. 2008;452:750‐754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Althouse BM, Flasche S, Thiem VD, et al. Seasonality of respiratory viruses causing hospitalizations for acute respiratory infections in children in Nha Trang, Vietnam. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;75:18‐25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dalziel BD, Kissler S, Gog JR, et al. Urbanization and humidity shape the intensity of influenza epidemics in U.S. cities. Science. 2018;362:75‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Geoghegan JL, Saavedra AF, Duchene S, Sullivan S, Barr I, Holmes EC. Correction: continental synchronicity of human influenza virus epidemics despite climatic variation. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Virk RK, Jayakumar J, Mendenhall IH, et al. Divergent evolutionary trajectories of influenza B viruses underlie their contemporaneous epidemic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:619‐628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National, regional, and state level outpatient illness and viral surveillance [Internet]. 2016–17. [cited 2020 Mar. 26]; Available from: https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html
  • 29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2013–14 influenza season vaccination coverage estimates for local areas and territories [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2019 Apr. 16]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/local‐areas‐estimates.htm

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FigS1‐S5

Table S1


Articles from Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES