Skip to main content
Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine logoLink to Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine
. 2020 Jul 14;4(3):355–357. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2020.4.46597

Point-of-care Ultrasound Detection of Cataract in a Patient with Vision Loss: A Case Report

Kyle Dornhofer 1, Marawan Alkhattabi 1, Shadi Lahham 1,
PMCID: PMC7434286  PMID: 32926685

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ocular ultrasound in the emergency department (ED) is an effective tool for promptly evaluating for several vision-threatening etiologies and can be used to identify more slowly progressing etiologies as well, such as cataract formation within the lens.

Case Report

A 62-year-old female presented to the ED with a two-day history of painless vision loss of the left eye as well as reduced vision for the prior 30 days.

Conclusion

Point-of-care ultrasound was performed and showed calcification of the lens consistent with cataract.

Keywords: POCUS, ultrasonography, ocular, cataract, vision loss

INTRODUCTION

Vision loss is a common complaint encountered in the emergency department (ED) and frequently prompts further imaging or consultation. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is well suited for the rapid assessment of several potential etiologies ranging from acutely vision-threatening to slowly progressive or chronic. We present a case of an elderly female with vision loss who was evaluated with POCUS and found to have a cataract, a diagnosis rarely initially made in the ED. In this case, point-of-care ocular ultrasound rapidly guided further management and disposition.

CASE REPORT

A 62-year-old female presented to the ED with a two-day history of painless vision loss of the left eye. She reported gradual reduction in her vision over the prior 30 days, with a more dramatic reduction in her vision over the prior two days. She denied any eye pain, flashers, floaters, or diplopia. Past medical history was significant for cerebrovascular accident, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. In the ED, physical exam was significant for chronic left facial droop with white opacification of the left lens, a visual acuity of 20/30 in the right eye, and perception of light only in the left eye. Point-of-care ocular ultrasound using a linear probe (10 megahertz) in the ocular setting showed lens calcification consistent with cataract (Image).

Image.

Image

Point-of-care ocular ultrasound image in the transverse plane, revealing lens calcification consistent with cataract (arrow).

Ophthalmology was consulted, and an anterior segment exam was performed. The right eye showed a diffuse grade 4 superficial punctate keratitis (SPK) with a grade 2 nuclear sclerotic cataract. In contrast, the left eye showed a grade 3 SPK with grade 4 mature cataract. The funduscopic exam was normal in the right eye, while the left eye view was obscured due to the mature cataract. B-scan was performed by ophthalmology, again showing a significant cataract in the left eye. Outpatient follow-up with possible cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation was recommended by ophthalmology.

DISCUSSION

Cataract is a clouding of the crystalline lens inside the eye. It is the leading cause of blindness and the most prevalent ocular disease worldwide.1,2 In the United States, it is the third leading cause of treatable blindness.3,4 Cataracts typically occur gradually as a result of aging or secondary to trauma, inflammation, metabolic/nutritional disorders, or radiation, with age-related cataracts being the most common cause.5,6 Cataracts are considered one of the earliest complications of diabetes mellitus.7

Patients often present with gradually decreased vision and increased problems with glare. They may or may not experience changes in refractive error and loss of stereopsis (depth perception). In the ED the ocular exam should include pupil examination, assessment of extraocular muscles, measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure, and confrontational visual field testing.8,9 Measurement of visual acuity under both high and low illumination can be helpful. Definitive diagnosis is made with slit lamp examination and direct visualization of the cataract within the lens. Treatment consists of vision correction with lenses or surgery depending on the severity of the cataract.7

CONCLUSION

Point-of-care ocular ultrasound can be performed when there is concern for posterior globe pathology (i.e., retinal/vitreous detachment), but visualization of the back of the eye with the slit lamp is obscured due to an opaque lens or when eyelids are swollen shut following injury. Indications for ocular ultrasound include decreased vision/loss of vision, suspected foreign body, ocular pain, eye trauma, and head injury. POCUS provides a rapid and noninvasive evaluation for several vision-threatening ocular emergencies including globe perforation, retrobulbar hematoma, retinal detachment, lens subluxation, vitreous hemorrhage, and intraocular foreign body.1012 Occasionally, as in this case, cataract formation within the lens can be directly visualized with ultrasound.

CPC-EM Capsule.

What do we already know about this clinical entity?

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness and the most prevalent ocular disease worldwide. Vision loss is a common complaint encountered in the emergency department.

What makes this presentation of disease reportable?

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was performed in a patient complaining of vision loss and showed findings consistent with cataract.

What is the major learning point?

POCUS is an effective tool for promptly evaluating a patient with complaints of vision loss.

How might this improve emergency medicine practice?

Ultrasound provides a rapid and noninvasive evaluation for several vision-threatening ocular emergencies.

Footnotes

Section Editor: Scott Goldstein, MD

Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_cpcem

The authors attest that their institution requires neither Institutional Review Board approval, nor patient consent for publication of this case report. Documentation on file.

Conflicts of Interest: By the CPC-EM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Thompson J, Lakhani N. Cataracts. Prim Care. 2015;42(3):409–23. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Foster A, Johnson GJ. Magnitude and causes of blindness in the developing world. Int Ophthalmol. 1990;14(3):135–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00158310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dana MR, Tielsch JM, Enger C, et al. Visual impairment in a rural Appalachian community. Prevalence and causes. JAMA. 1990;264(18):2400–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in East Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(20):1412–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199111143252004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Datiles MB, Kinoshita JH. Pathogenesis of cataracts. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, editors. Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1991. pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bunce GE. The role of nutrition in cataract. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, editors. Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1991. pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Klein BE, Klein R, Wang Q, et al. Older-onset diabetes and lens opacities. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1995;2(1):49–55. doi: 10.3109/09286589509071451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Juang PS, Rosen P. Ocular examination techniques for the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1997;15(6):793–810. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00187-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gorovoy IR. Pearls in ophthalmology for the emergency nurse. J Emerg Nurs. 2015;41(1):19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dewitz A. Soft tissue applications. In: Ma OJ, Mateer J, editors. Emergency Ultrasound. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003. p. 385. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Whitcomb MB. How to diagnose ocular abnormalities with ultrasound. AAEP Proceedings. 2002;48:272–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Price DD, Simon BC, Park RS. Evolution of emergency ultrasound. Cal J Emerg Med. 2003;4(4):82–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Irvine

RESOURCES