Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Aug 18;2020(8):14–16. doi: 10.1016/S1361-3723(20)30086-5

GDPR in the new remote-working normal

Marc Lueck 1
PMCID: PMC7434312

Abstract

Since May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has required any organisation doing business with European citizens to make significant changes to its data processes. Over the two years since it came into law, it has ushered in a new level of data hygiene to enterprises.

At that time, the focus was on office boundaries. Now, with the pandemic forcing huge swathes of the workforce to work remotely, and shifting business focus away from the office environment, organisations are having to revisit their initial efforts and ensure that compliance with GDPR can still be achieved in this new normal. Marc Lueck at Zscaler offers some guidelines on how to achieve this.


graphic file with name fx1_lrg.jpg

Marc Lueck

This was not a painless process, however. Organisations globally went through the often costly exercise of ensuring they had an overview of personal information, as well as implementing tools to be able to process and store that data in a secure manner.

When the GDPR came into force, many organisations quickly deployed best-of-breed security tools to keep their data secure. At that time, the focus was predominantly limited to office boundaries. Now, with current social distancing guidelines forcing huge swathes of the workforce to work remotely, and potentially shifting business focus away from the office environment in the future, organisations are having to revisit their initial efforts and ensure that compliance with GDPR can still be achieved in this new normal. What follows are guidelines as to how organisations can ensure this.

Impact assessments

Businesses that already had processes and policies in place for remote working are in the enviable position of merely having to ensure that those policies and rules are in use by their staff working from home. However, those organisations which have only had an onsite workforce or offered limited flexible working will need to identify if en masse working from home impacts or changes risk levels. This will require opening up their records of processing activities and each of their data protection impact assessments (DPIA).

A DPIA is a process to identify data protection and privacy risk and address them accordingly. Under GDPR, where processing operations present specific risks to individuals’ privacy rights due to their nature, scope or purpose, controllers carry out an assessment of the impact of the proposed processing operations on the protection of personal data.

It's key to note that a DPIA is an ongoing process, and as any project develops or a new situation arises, new risks might be identified. Means to avoid those risks must also be found. When an organisation is making significant changes to an existing system or process – as might be the case with remote working – it's necessary to revisit the DPIAs and check whether the new situation and processes are already covered or not.

As the aim of a DPIA is to identify and analyse how data privacy might be affected by differing actions or activities when working from home, companies are responsible for ensuring that the appropriate controls are in place when personal information is accessed or processed from a home environment, and that the information is handled no differently than it was from the office.

Data privacy in remote working

What complicates matters for businesses with the current situation is the sheer scale of the issue. Over the past few months it has become clear that, thanks to technology, employees can stay productive while out of the office. However, it needs to be ensured that the private work environment also keeps any accessed and processed data as secure as in a corporate office. With the global Covid-19 situation forcing all members of a household to stay at home wherever possible, each individual environment has to be evaluated.

Questions that a business may not have considered suddenly become of the utmost importance. What does the workplace look like when working from home? Is there a physical office available, or a cupboard or closet that can be locked in order to guarantee privacy of data and devices? Are there children in the household, and if so, is the device or devices the employee uses for work used for other purposes? It's all too tempting to allow the family to use a work laptop, or to use it for casual private browsing. Conversely, security risks can also be introduced in the opposite way – if private devices that might not be equipped with security tools are used for work purposes.

Organisations are therefore having to revisit their security posture to provide a safe remote-working experience that prevents data breaches. Not only should they address vulnerabilities to their own networks and the physical storage of data, they will have to face the fact that remote workers will inevitably have to move data between the corporate network, the cloud and the personal laptop. To protect personal data in transit from one location to another, GDPR suggests encryption to protect privacy and security and prevent leakage.

Five-step plan

Not all of an organisation's employees will be accessing sensitive personal information while they are working from home. The changes needed are more granular and, first and foremost, an organisation has to figure out which employees are dealing with sensitive information.

Step 1: Reopen your DPIA. The first step for an organisation is figuring out where you need to apply this remote-working policy. That means a DPIA has to be reopened to understand the impact of the new environment of remote working. During this process the organisation can gain insight into which employees access sensitive personal information while working from home, and subsequently create various risk categories for the remote workforce.

Step 2: Ascertaining the physical requirements of the home office. Based on the impact of the DPIA mentioned above, new controls may need to be applied specifically for that identified category of employees dealing with sensitive information while working remotely. Organisations have to figure out what the home office has to look like for the different categories of remote workers.

When looking at the physical security of a remote workplace, organisations have to take different measures into account based on the risk categorisation. That might start with having a separate room at home that can be locked at the lighter end of the scale, and range up to video surveillance for the highest security category.

Step 3: IT security for the home office. The biggest challenge in a remote office scenario is arguably maintaining visibility into the data traffic and devices so as to prevent threats. Both data controllers and data processors have to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the same level of security in the home office environment as in the corporate office, and which is also appropriate to the risk categorisation level.

At a minimum, remote employees will require secure access to the resources they need in the corporate datacentre or the cloud. Additionally, data governance has to be applied to make sure that the data stays where it is supposed to stay and is not copied locally.

Step 4: User awareness of remote working policy. All of these steps until now will be for nothing if organisations don't ensure that their remote employees are aware and conscious of the business's acceptable use policies (AUPs). Keeping data privacy an ongoing cultural element of remote working is key. All those employees dealing with sensitive information must ensure that nobody else in the family deals with the devices that access or process any of this data. Consistent reminders of this fact may seem like nagging, but without this awareness the whole system falls apart.

Step 5: Training employees. Last but not least, the pandemic situation calls for an urgent rethinking of general security training. In the past few months we've seen bad actors attempting to capitalise on these times of uncertainty and fear to spread new malware campaigns and take advantage of the remote working situation. Organisations should switch up their security training as well. Open and frequent communication with staff around their security responsibilities is key when staff are not in the corporate office.

The uncertain new normal

This all may seem like a lot of work – and it is. But organisations can take some comfort that these efforts to revisit GDPR compliance are worth the effort. As and when we gradually emerge from the global pandemic, working from anywhere is predicted to become a core part of the new normal, and the processes laid down today will remain relevant for years to come.

Even if the majority of the workforce does indeed choose to return to the office, an organisation can be confident that it's prepared, should any similar event happen in future, and that it can offer more-flexible working practices should its employees demand it.

Biography

About the author

Marc Lueck is CISO EMEA at Zscaler (www.zscaler.com). He is a senior security practitioner with over 20 years’ experience crossing multiple industry sectors, from financial services to publishing, specialising in enterprise security management, threat intelligence, compliance and security architecture.


Articles from Computer Fraud & Security are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES