Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Aug 18;31(11):1585–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2095

Androgen deprivation therapy may constitute a more effective COVID-19 prophylactic than therapeutic strategy

NN Bennani 1, IM Bennani-Baiti 2
PMCID: PMC7434419  PMID: 32822832

Cellular transmembrane-serine-protease-2 (TMPRSS2), first cloned in 1997, has been intermittently the subject of intensive medical research, starting with the discovery of its role in recurrent TMPRSS2/ETS fusions and prostate cancer pathogenesis. TMPRSS2 protein was subsequently shown to proteolytically activate human respiratory tract viruses including influenza A, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 underlying the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, eyes naturally turned to the androgen-regulated TMPRSS2 gene for SARS-CoV-2 lung tropism, mortality rates, and gender bias.

A study by Montopoli et al. in the Annals of Oncology reported findings congruent with the prevailing notion that high SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and disease severity in men may be the result of high androgen-driven TMPRSS2 expression in the lungs. The authors posit that since TMPRSS2 is under positive transcriptional control by the androgen receptor (AR), reduction of TMPRSS2 expression following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients would be expected to correlate with reduced SARS-CoV-2 incidence, and in case of infection, with lesser disease severity.1 While fewer prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT contracted the virus, androgen suppression did not lessen disease severity (Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes between prostate cancer patients undergoing (+ADT) or not (−ADT) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

Outcome +ADT −ADT
Hospitalizations 2 out of 4 (50%) 76 out of 114 (66.7%)
Mild disease 3 out of 4 (75%) 83 out of 114 (72.8%)
Severe disease 1 out of 4 (25%) 31 out of 114 (27.2%)
Admission to ICU 1 out of 4 (25%) 13 out of 114 (11.4%)
Deathsa 0 out of 4 (0%) 18 out of 114 (15.8%)

The current thinking posits that under ADT, expression of TMPRSS2 (a co-factor for SARS-CoV-2 activation and virulence) would be reduced in the lungs, leading to less severe disease, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. Data in this table from the Italian Veneto region contradict this widely accepted supposition: ADT imparts no major positive effects on hospitalization, disease severity, or ICU admissions.

ICU, intensive care unit.

a

A definitive analysis of mortality rates is rendered difficult owing to the very small size of the cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT (4 patients only). Nevertheless, if one were to assume that the fatality rates of the control group without ADT (∼16%) are similar to those of the ADT group, one would predict less than one death in the latter, a finding consistent with the lack of fatalities in this group.

Several findings indicate that TMPRSS2 is unlikely to play a major role in SARS-CoV-2 lung pathology in men (and women): first, modulation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2 has so far been observed only in TMPRSS2 protein overexpression experiments and no patient data to this effect are available. Moreover, while high TMPRSS2 mRNA levels have been documented in the human lung,2 AR and TMPRSS2 proteins do not appear to be highly expressed in the lungs.2 , 3 This indicates that androgens do not control TMPRSS2 expression in the lungs and that while TMPRSS2 protease experimentally activates SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, it is probably not the host cell co-factor for SARS-CoV-2 lung infection in the clinical setting. In addition, recent studies showed no differences in TMPRSS2 mRNA lung expression in men versus women4 or male versus female mice,4 , 5 further supporting a lack of androgen control of TMPRSS2 expression in the lung or of a role for TMPRSS2 in mediating the increased SARS-CoV-2 incidence in men. Accordingly, ADT has no effect on TMPRSS2 mRNA expression in mouse lungs,4 , 5 further challenging the notion of a putative androgen–TMPRSS2 axis mediating SARS-CoV-2 gender bias and virulence. Another study, however, showed that ADT decreased TMPRSS2 transcripts in murine lungs, though the same study showed that TMPRSS2 lung expression is not reduced following castration.6 Finally, TMPRS22 transcripts are moderately modulated in vitro by androgens in the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549, raising the possibility of TMPRSS2 transcript modulation by androgens in patients afflicted with lung adenocarcinoma.5

It is not completely clear from the study by Montopoli et al. if the reduced COVID-19 incidence in the ADT cohort is solely due to ADT, or whether it might be due to additional clinical variables inherent to the ADT group. In particular, disease stage and the type of treatment that may affect AR or TMPRSS2 expression and/or patients' immunocompetence (e.g. systemic glucocorticoid treatment and/or chemotherapy) were not disclosed. Additionally, whether patients on ADT were still undergoing ADT while hospitalized for COVID-19 and the length of ADT before Sars-CoV-2 infection were also not reported, further hampering definitive analysis.

These limitations notwithstanding, the analysis by Montopoli et al. shows that androgens are at least in part to blame for COVID-19 male incidence,1 consistent with earlier reports of high androgenetic alopecia prevalence in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and decreased activity of the ACE2 SARS-CoV-2 receptor following experimental orchidectomy.7 Since SARS-CoV-2 is gender-biased, a possible mechanism for increased male infection may be in the immunosuppressive properties of androgens. A recent study showed that male mice under ADT mount a more robust immune response8 and in humans, genes associated with poor virus response are up-regulated by androgens.9 Finally, men presenting high serum androgen levels display the weakest influenza immune response.9 These data suggest that androgens may yet be a determinant of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility, just unlikely through TMPRSS2.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Olli Jänne, Professor Emeritus (Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Finland), for generously and promptly supplementing data pertinent to his work cited in reference 5.

Funding

None declared.

Disclosure

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Montopoli M., Zumerle S., Vettoret R. Androgen-deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2: a population-based study (n = 4532) Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1040–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Human Protein Atlas. TMPRSS2, The Human Protein Atlas. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000184012-TMPRSS2/tissue Available at.
  • 3.The Human Protein Atlas. AR, The Human Protein Atlas. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000169083-AR/tissue Available at.
  • 4.Baratchian M., McManus J., Berk K. No evidence that androgen regulation of pulmonary TMPRSS2 explains sex-discordant COVID-19 outcomes. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.21.051201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mikkonena L., Pihlajamaaa P., Sahua B. Androgen receptor and androgen-dependent gene expression in lung. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;317:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leach D.A., Isac A.-M., Bevan C.L. TMPRSS2, required for SARS-CoV-2 entry, is downregulated in lung cells by enzalutamide, a prostate cancer therapeutic. Research Square. 2020 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-34503/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goren A., McCoy J., Wambier C.G. What does androgenetic alopecia have to do with COVID-19? An insight into a potential new therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2020:e13365. doi: 10.1111/dth.13365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Polesso F., Hipfinger C., Sehrawat A. Androgen receptor targeted therapy sensitizes tumor bearing mice to effective immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2020;204(Suppl 1):241.34. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Furman D., Hejblum B.P., Simon N. Systems analysis of sex differences reveals an immunosuppressive role for testosterone in the response to influenza vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:869–874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321060111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Oncology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES