Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2020 May 22;8(8):e1281. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1281

Clinical and genetic analysis of lipoprotein glomerulopathy patients caused by APOE mutations

Mingxin Yang 1, Qinjie Weng 1, Xiaoxia Pan 1, Hafiz Muhammad Jafar Hussain 1, Shuwen Yu 1, Jing Xu 1, Xialian Yu 1, Yunzi Liu 1, Yuanmeng Jin 1, Chunli Zhang 1, Xiao Li 1, Hong Ren 1, Nan Chen 1, Jingyuan Xie 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7434605  PMID: 32441489

Abstract

Background

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG) is a rare kidney disease caused by APOE mutations. The aim of this study was to correlate the genetic and clinical features of LPG.

Methods

Totally eight LPG patients were recruited in this study and Sanger sequencing of APOE was performed for all available family members. Clinical and histological features were analyzed. A literature review of LPG was also conducted.

Results

Genetic analysis revealed five patients with APOE‐Kyoto, two with APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki, and one with APOE‐Chicago mutations. LPG patients with urine protein reduced more than 50% had a slower decrease in renal function than those with less urine protein reduction (estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction rate −5.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2⋅month−1, p = .03). We then enrolled 95 LPG patients from previous studies and this study. LPG patients had higher blood pressure (mean arterial pressure: 109.4 ± 19.4 vs. 94.4 ± 11.1 mmHg, p < .001) than the control group. Interestingly, patients with APOE mutations in the LDL receptor binding region had higher serum apolipoprotein E (apoE) levels [ln(apoE): 2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5 mg/dl, p < .001] in comparison to other domains.

Conclusion

Here, we report for the first time APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki and APOE‐Chicago mutations in the Chinese population. LPG was associated with higher blood pressure and serum apoE levels were higher in patients with mutations in LDL receptor binding region. In addition, the findings further indicated that treatment of proteinuria might slow down renal function progression in these patients.

Keywords: APOE, lipoprotein glomerulopathy, mutation, proteinuria

For the first time APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki and APOE‐Chicago mutations reported in Chinese; Lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG) patients with urine protein remission had slower renal function decrease; LPG was associated with higher blood pressure; Serum apoE levels were higher in patients with low‐density lipoprotein receptor binding region mutations of APOE

graphic file with name MGG3-8-e1281-g005.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG, MIM #611771) is a rare renal disorder and characterized by renal lipidosis, renal insufficiency, and proteinuria. The Japanese scholar Saito described LPG for the first time in 1989 (Saito et al., 1989). To the best of our knowledge, approximately 200 cases of LPG have been reported worldwide so far and most of them were from East Asia presenting with founder effect along with several cases from Americas and Europe (Batal, Fakhoury, Groopman, D'Agati, & Morris, 2019; Magistroni et al., 2013; Rovin et al., 2007; Russi et al., 2009; Saito & Matsunaga, 2014). Most LPG patients had mutations in APOE (apolipoprotein E, MIM* 107741), except for one reported by Zhang et al. (2008

). The mRNA of APOE is translated to a protein of 317 amino acids and the mature protein loses its signal peptide of the first 18 amino acids (Marais, 2019). Here we mainly use the numbering applicable to the mature protein as in previous publications, while only in Sanger sequencing results we use the numbering of 317 amino acids (NP_000032.1) for location. APOE is a ligand for the low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPG) and LDL receptor‐related protein and it includes an LDL receptor binding region (amino acids 136–150) and a HSPG binding region (amino acids 142–147) in the N‐terminal domain. APOE has three variants ε2, ε3, and ε4, depending on the different amino acids at positions 112 and 158, and the APOE ε3 is regarded as the wild type (Bennet et al., 2007). Till date, nearly 70 mutations have been identified in APOE associated with LPG, dysbetalipoproteinemia, hypertriglyceridemia and Alzheimer's disease, etc. The first mutation associated with LPG in APOE was APOE‐Sendai reported in Japan (Saito et al., 1989). More than 10 types of LPG‐related mutations have been identified in APOE showing autosomal dominant inheritance patterns with incomplete penetrance (Matsunaga & Saito, 2014). LPG‐related mutations found in China include APOE‐Kyoto, APOE‐Tokyo/Maebashi, APOE‐Guangzhou, and APOE‐Chengdu (Han et al., 2010; Wu, Yang, & Hu, 2018). Hu et al. (2014) found dozens of APOE‐Kyoto mutant LPG patients in Sichuan Province of China, which was the largest group of LPG patients reported so far (Hu et al., 2014).

Clinical manifestations of LPG patients include mild nephrotic problem initially but later progress to nephrotic syndrome with elevated levels of serum apolipoprotein E (apoE), hyperlipidemia, hypertension and microscopic hematuria (Hu et al., 2014; Saito & Matsunaga, 2014). The abnormal plasma lipoprotein profile of patients resembles type III hyperlipoproteinemia, while the defect is limited to the kidney. The systemic manifestations of type III hyperlipidemia, such as xanthoma, are hardly seen in patients with LPG (Matsunaga & Saito, 2014). The diagnosis of LPG mainly relies on histopathology. In light microscope, pale‐stained thrombus‐like substances can be seen in the glomerular capillary lumen. Using snap‐frozen kidney sections, immunofluorescence shows that apolipoprotein B (apoB), apoE and Sudan III staining are positive (Hu et al., 2014). Fibrate lipid‐lowering drug therapy is used to cure this disease. However, few studies have dealt with the relation between genotypes and phenotypes. Here, we present the clinical features of eight Chinese patients with LPG in our department recruited in the last 20 years (1998–2019), along with 87 patients from already published literature to explain the association between genotype–phenotype correlation.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Ethical compliance

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and was conducted in accordance with the principle of the Helsinki Declaration.

2.2. Study design

A total of eight biopsy‐proven LPG patients whose DNA samples available were enrolled. The patients were diagnosed in Ruijin Hospital between 1998 and 2019. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Detailed clinical baseline data including age, gender, mean arterial pressure (MAP), albumin (Alb), hemoglobin (Hb), urine protein (Upro), serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum triglyceride (TG), serum total cholesterol (TC), and serum apoE were collected from all patients at the time of kidney biopsies. eGFR was calculated using the chronic kidney disease (CKD) Epidemiology Collaboration equation (EPI‐eGFR; Levey et al., 2009).

2.3. Sanger sequencing

DNA samples of the patients and their family members were extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes or from epithelial cells in saliva by using QuickGene DNA Whole Blood kit L (FujiFilm Life Sciences). We designed primers (Table S1) covering the four exon regions of APOE, and the reference gene sequence was derived from the NCBI database (GenBank accession no. NM_000041.4). After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, Sanger sequencing and analysis were performed.

2.4. Literature review

We sought studies published between 1 January 1989, when LPG was first reported (Saito et al., 1989), and 30 September 2018 on LPG patients with APOE mutations. Electronic searches, limited to English/Chinese language, were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Wanfang Data (Chinese), and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (Chinese) with the keywords “lipoprotein glomerulopathy”. A flow chart is shown in Figure S1. We retrieved 28 articles from 327 records, limited to reports of LPG patients with APOE mutations. From the selected papers, we enrolled 87 patients totally, of whom 52 patients’ individual baseline data were available.

We also enrolled non‐LPG nephrotic syndrome (NS) patients as a control group. Inclusion criteria were primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)/minimal change disease (MCD) defined by kidney biopsy and NS defined by Upro > 3.5 g/24 hr and plasma‐albumin < 30 g/L. Exclusion criteria were eGFR < 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at the time of biopsy or any evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus, renal amyloidosis, obesity‐related glomerulopathy, diabetic nephropathy, systemic vasculitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐associated nephropathy, or other systemic diseases. As a result, 60 patients with NS (27 FSGS and 33 MCD) from our department during 2013–2015 were enrolled. A comparison with the control group in clinical manifestations and a correlation analysis of genetic and clinical features was performed.

2.5. Statistical analysis

The continuous variables conformed to the normal distribution are presented as means ± SD, and independent t‐test was employed to evaluate the difference between the two groups. Continuous variables were transformed to a logarithmic scale when they did not pass the normality test. The categorical variables are expressed in terms of frequency (percentage) using the Pearson chi‐square test. The data from published literature were processed using an established statistical method (Altman, Machin, Bryant, & Gardner, 2000). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software and statistical charts were drawn by GraphPad Prism 7 software. Differences were considered statistically significant with a two‐side p < .05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Demographic data and clinico‐histological features

A total of eight patients including six males and two females, aged 16–50 years old, from unrelated Han families were recruited in this study. They came from different provinces of China including Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Hubei, Xinjiang, Anhui, and Guizhou. Interestingly family history was found in five cases.

Baseline clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. All the patients presented with moderate to nephrotic range proteinuria (range, 1.5–10.5 g/24 hr). Systemic manifestations of lipidoses were not found. Average eGFR of patients was 83.6 ± 20.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (range of 51.9–110.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2) at the time of kidney biopsy, while eGFRs of two patients were less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Elevated TG levels (higher than 1.7 mmol/L) were observed in seven of the eight patients and more than half of the patients presented with elevated TC levels (higher than 5.7 mmol/L). Serum apoE was tested in patients and only two of them presented with elevated apoE levels (higher than 5.3 mg/dl).

TABLE 1.

Baseline clinical characteristics of lipoprotein glomerulopathy patients

Parameters Subjects
F171101‐II4 F17A0528‐II2 F15A1307‐II1 F15A1558‐II1 F98034‐III1 F16A0702‐II2 F16A1578‐II1 F19A0312‐II4
Age (year) 42 16 30 50 38 22 28 50
Gender M M F M F M M M
Family history Y Y Y N Y Y N N
MAP (mmHg) 91 116 84 117 117 141 141 106
Alb (g/L) 33.6 20.0 34.0 20.0 22.3 21.0 19.1 31.2
Hb (g/L) 121 106 117 137 101 115 117 NA
Upro (g/24 hr) 1.5 5.1 1.5 5.0 10.5 10.0 8.8 5.7
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 56.2 110.8 101.2 84.5 93.4 98.5 71.9 51.9
TG (mmol/L) 3.0 2.7 1.5 3.0 3.7 1.9 2.1 4.3
TC (mmol/L) 7.6 6.4 3.4 7.8 5.8 3.5 9.9 5.2
apoE (mg/dl) 4.5 6.4 3.6 6.6 NA 3.6 4.1 NA
APOE mutation Kyoto Kyoto Kyoto Kyoto Kyoto Osaka Osaka Chicago
APOE genotype ε3/ε3 ε3/ε4 ε3/ε3 ε3/ε4 ε3/ε3 ε3/ε3 ε3/ε4 ε3/ε3
Pathology a
Global sclerosis 3 1 1 1 0 2 2 0
Segmental sclerosis 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Interstitial fibrosis 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1
Interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 1
Tubular atrophy 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 0
Vascular lesion 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
Open in a new tab
a

The standards of pathology grade were as follows:

Global sclerosis was defined as sclerosis involving the entire glomerular tuft. Global sclerosis was scored by the percentage of glomeruli with these lesions: 0, 0%; 1, <10%; 2, 10%–24%; 3, ≥25%.

Segmental sclerosis was defined as tufts involved with sclerosis other than global sclerosis. Segmental sclerosis was scored as follows: 0, absent; 1, present.

The severity of interstitial fibrosis, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration and tubular atrophy are defined as follows: 0, 0% area involved; 1, <10%; 2, 10%–24%; 3, ≥25%.

The vascular lesion was defined by arterial hyaline change and vascular wall thickening: for either, definitions were 0, absent, or 1, present.

Abbreviations: Alb, albumin; apoE, apolipoprotein E; Chicago, APOE‐Chicago (p.R147P); EPI‐eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate using EPI; F, female; Hb, hemoglobin; Kyoto, APOE‐Kyoto (p.R25C); M, male; MAP, mean arterial pressure; N, No; NA, not available. All the parameters in this table were obtained at time of kidney biopsy; Osaka, APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki (p.R158P); TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; Upro, urine protein; Y, Yes.

Light microscopy of the renal tissues revealed the expansion of the capillary lumen. Furthermore, immunofluorescence microscopy showed deposition of apoE and apoB. Deposition of the immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody was found in the glomerulus of one patient (F16A1578‐II1; Figures 1h–j and 2h–k).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Family pedigrees, genomic sequencing, and kidney biopsy specimens of patients with APOE‐Kyoto mutation. (a–e) Family pedigrees of five lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG) families with APOE‐Kyoto mutation. Arrows show the probands. (f) Representative chromatograms of control (upper) and mutant (lower). The position of APOE‐Kyoto mutation is marked by arrow and red dashed box shows the genetic code of arginine (Arg). (g) Multiple sequence alignment of different species shows a high level of conservation at the position of substitution. (h) A representative glomerulus from patient F171101‐II4 shows marked dilatation of the capillary lumen in the glomeruli by a pale‐stained thrombus‐like substance (periodic acid‐Schiff stain). Immunofluorescence shows that apoE (i) and apoB (j) are present primarily in the capillary lumen. GenBank accession no. NM_000041.4. Scale bars 100 μm

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Family pedigrees, genomic sequencing, and kidney biopsy specimens of patients with APO E‐Osaka/Kurashiki and APOE‐Chicago mutations. Family pedigrees of LPG patients with APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki mutation (a, b) and APOE‐Chicago mutation (c). Arrows show the probands. (d, f) Representative chromatograms of control (upper) and mutant (lower) for both mutations. The positions of the Osaka/Kurashiki mutation (D)/Chicago mutation (f) are marked by arrow and red dashed boxes show the genetic code of arginine. (e, g) Multiple sequence alignment of different species shows that the substituted amino acids are highly conserved. (h) A representative glomerulus from patient F16A1578‐II1 shows marked dilatation of the capillary lumen in the glomeruli by a pale‐stained thrombus‐like substance (periodic acid‐Schiff stain). Immunofluorescence shows that apoE (i) and apoB (j) are present primarily in the capillary lumen. (k) Deposition of immunoglobulin A (IgA) was found in the glomerulus of patient F16A1578‐II1. GenBank accession no. NM_000041.4. Scale bars 100 μm

3.2. Genotyping

Sequencing of the entire APOE coding region revealed that five patients (F171101‐II4, F17A0528‐II2, F15A1307‐II1, F15A1558‐II1, and F98034‐III1) had heterozygous APOE‐Kyoto mutation (chr19‐45411100, c.127C>T, p.R43C) which could substitute the amino acid at position 25 from arginine (Arg) to cysteine (Cys). Three of them had an APOE genotype of ε3/ε3 and two ε3/ε4. Additionally, two patients (F16A0702‐II2 and F16A1578‐II1) had heterozygous APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki mutation (chr19‐45412080, c.527G>C, p.R176P) which could substitute the amino acid at position 158 from Arg to proline (Pro). They had genotypes of ε3/ε3 and ε3/ε4 respectively. Moreover, one patient (F19A0312‐II4) was detected with heterozygous APOE‐Chicago mutation (chr19‐45412047, c.494G>C, p.R165P) which could replace Arg by Pro in position 147 at protein level, with a genotype of ε3/ε3. Furthermore, Sanger sequencing was performed for F171101‐II4, F17A0528‐II2, F98034‐III1 and F16A0702‐II2 families to validate the inheritance pattern. Interestingly, we found asymptomatic carriers in three families (F171101, F17A0528, and F16A0702), and the penetrance was 54.5% (six patients and five asymptomatic carriers of the three families; Figures 1a,b and 2a).

3.3. Treatment and follow‐up

Patients were treated with statins (F15A1307‐II1, F15A1558‐II1, F16A0702‐II2, and F16A1578‐II1) or fibrates (F171101‐II4, F17A0528‐II2, F15A1558‐II1, F16A0702‐II2, F16A1578‐II1, and F19A0312‐II4) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; all of them). Two of them (F17A0528‐II2 and F16A0702‐II2) went through plasma exchange or blood lipid adsorption and their Upro and serum lipid levels went down for a while. But shortly after the treatment, the values returned to baseline. One patient (F15A1558‐II1) received glucocorticoid treatment for more than three years and his Upro remained 2.6–5.0 g/24 hr. One (F98034‐III1) of the six patients was lost to follow‐up, and the interval of patient F19A0312‐II4 from renal biopsy to the data collection was too short. The remaining patients were followed‐up for a median of 22 (range of 12–36) months. Patient F171101‐II4 stopped fenofibrate therapy because of temporarily elevated serum creatinine or liver enzyme levels. His proteinuria once decreased to 0.4 g/24 hr but increased after he ceased the treatment, as well as his apoE level. Patient F16A1578‐II1 was treated with statins instead of fibrates due to high TC level. We screened family members of F16A0702 (Figure 2a) at their first hospital visit and found that F16A0702‐I2 had normal Upro level at that time. One year later, when we validated that she had the APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki mutation by Sanger sequencing, and her Upro had reached 2.1 g/24 hr.

We divided the patients into PR (partial remission) group (n = 2) and NR (nonremission; n = 4) groups based on whether their Upro at the 12th month of follow‐up decreased equal to or more than 50% compared to baseline. Interestingly, the speed of eGFR decline in patients from the PR group was slower (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. −5.0 ± 0.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2⋅month, p = .03; Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trends in urine protein partial remission (PR) patients (blue) and nonremission (NR) patients (black). eGFR changes in each patient are presented with dashed line. The lines with mean eGFR change linear regression slope of PR patients (blue continuous line) and NR patients (black continuous line) show better kidney prognosis of urine protein PR patients. PR (partial remission) group: urine protein at the 12th month of follow‐up decreased equal to or more than 50% compared to baseline; NR (none remission) group: urine protein at the 12th month of follow‐up decreased less than 50% compared to baseline.

3.4. Literature review

Furthermore, we did a literature review of already reported LPG patients having APOE mutations. By inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 87 LPG patients and they all had APOE mutations. Hence, our study included a total of 95 patients from previous reports and from our department to correlate the genetic and clinical features of LPG patients.

Most LPG‐related mutations are in or around the LDL receptor binding region of APOE, indicating the mechanistic insight for their roles in the pathogenesis of LPG (Figure 4). Thus, we divided the patients into groups depending on the mutation sites (in or outside of the LDL receptor and HSPG binding region).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

APOE mutations in different regions. APOE mutation frequency causing lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG) is higher in the low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor binding region (amino acids 136–150) or around it, especially in the heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPG) binding region (amino acids 142 to 147). Mutations in the HSPG binding region (APOE Tokyo/Maebashi/Sendai/Chicago) are in red font. Mutations in the LDL receptor binding region outsides the HSPG binding region (APOE Okayama/Modena/Guangzhou) are in yellow font. Mutations outside the LDL receptor binding region (APOE Kyoto/Tsukuba/Las Vegas/Chengdu/Osaka/Kurashiki/ApoE1/Hongkong/Toyonaka) are in blue font

There were 36 patients with mutations in LDL receptor binding region (amino acids 136–150) of whom 31 patients with mutations in HSPG binding region (amino acids 142–146), and 59 patients with mutations in other domains of APOE protein (Table 2). It shows that the LDL receptor binding region is a hot spot site for genetic alterations. Furthermore, patients with LPG had higher blood pressure than the control group (MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.4) (MAP: 109.4 ± 19.4 vs. 94.4 ± 11.1 mmHg, p < .001), while Upro [ln (Upro): 1.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 g/24 hr, p < .001) and TC levels [ln (TC): 1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 mmol/L, p < .001] were lower. Interestingly, patients with APOE mutations in the LDL receptor binding region had higher serum apoE levels than mutations in other regions [ln(apoE): 2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5 mg/dl, p < .001]. Among patients with mutations in the LDL receptor binding region, patients with mutations in the HSPG binding region consisted of the majority (N = 31 [86%]). Among patients with LDL receptor binding region mutations in or outside of the HSPG binding region, the comparison of the clinical characters showed that patients with mutations in the HSPG binding region had higher serum apoE levels than the others (Table 2). Meanwhile, although not statistically significant, compared with patients having mutations in the LDL receptor binding region and outside of the HSPG binding region, patients with APOE mutations in the HSPG binding region had a trend of younger onset age (31.3 ± 17.7 vs .40.0 ± 18.7, p = .32), higher Upro [ln(Upro): 1.0 ± 0.9 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6 g/24 hr, p = .3], and higher TG [ln(TG): 1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L, p = .06].

TABLE 2.

Distribution of APOE mutations in lipoprotein glomerulopathy patients

Mutation location
LDLR‐HSPG LDLR‐non‐HSPG Other regions Control
n 31 5 59 60
Male, n (%) 15 (48.4) 1 (20.0) 31 (52.5) 31 (51.7)
Positive family history, n (%) 14 (45.2) 3 (60.0) 12 (32.4) —
Age (year) 31.3 ± 17.7 40.0 ± 18.7 37.0 ± 12.9 35.0 ± 12.8
MAP (mmHg) 105.4 ± 14.0 a 107.2 ± 25.1 111.0 ± 20.8 a 94.4 ± 11.1
ln(Upro) (g/24 hr) 1.0 ± 0.9 a , b 0.3 ± 0.6 a 1.5 ± 0.9 a 1.9 ± 0.5
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 95.4 ± 35.3 104.4 ± 28.6 83.9 ± 31.7 a 95.3 ± 27.5
ln(TG) (mmol/L) 1.1 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.6
ln(TC) (mmol/L) 1.8 ± 0.4 a 1.9 ± 0.3 a 1.8 ± 0.5 a 2.3 ± 0.4
ln(apoE) (mg/dL) c 2.7 ± 0.4 a , b 1.9 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.5 a 1.8 ± 0.3
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: apoE, apolipoprotein E; EPI‐eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate using EPI; LDLR‐HSPG, mutations in HSPG binding region within low‐density lipoprotein receptor binding region; LDLR‐nonHSPG, mutations in low‐density lipoprotein receptor binding region outsides HSPG binding region; MAP, mean arterial pressure; n, number; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; Upro, urine protein.

a

Compared with control group (MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.4), p < .05.

b

Compared with other regions group, p < .05.

c

ln(apoE): 83 of the 95 LPG patients and 19 (two focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and 17 minimal change disease) of the control group had apoE data. Among the 83 LPG patients, 27 had mutations in LDLR‐HSPG, two in LDLR‐nonHSPG, and 54 in other regions.

Furthermore, 48 LPG patients with serum apoE available were classified into two groups according to the median serum apoE level (11.2 mg/dl). Patients in the high apoE level group had higher TC levels than those in the low apoE group (ln(TC): 1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 mmol/L, p = .006; Table S2). Furthermore, although not statistically significant, patients in the high apoE group showed a trend of younger onset age (31.1 ± 19.1 vs. 34.9 ± 14.0 years old, p = .4), higher MAP (106.8 ± 15.1 vs. 101.7 ± 15.6 mmHg, p = .4), higher Upro [ln(Upro): 1.0 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 1.2 g/24 hr, p = .5], and higher TG levels [ln(TG): 1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6 mmol/L, p = .2] compared with patients in the low apoE group.

To further investigate the relationship between LPG and MAP, we built a linear regression model. Compared with the control group, patients in the LPG group were associated with a higher MAP before adjusted (β = 10.2 [4.9–15.6], p < .001), after adjusted for age and sex in model II (β = 10.7 [5.7–15.7], p < .001), and after adjusted for age, sex, eGFR, Upro, ln(TG) and ln(TC) in model III (β = 11.6 [5.6–17.6], p < .001; Table 3). These results suggested that LPG was a risk factor for hypertension independent of other common factors.

TABLE 3.

Relationship between lipoprotein glomerulopathy and mean arterial pressure in different models

Variable Model I Model II Model III
β (95% CI) p‐value β (95% CI) p‐value β (95% CI) p‐value
Control a Ref Ref Ref
LPG 10.2 (4.9–15.6) <.001 10.7 (5.7–15.7) <.001 11.6 (5.6–17.6) <.001
Open in a new tab

Model I, unadjusted; Model II, adjusted for age and sex; Model III, adjusted for age, sex, Estimated glomerular filtration rate, ln (urine protein), ln (triglyceride), ln (total cholesterol).

Abbreviations: LPG, lipoprotein glomerulopathy; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference.

a

The nephrotic syndrome control group (MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.4).

4. DISCUSSION

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy is a rare inherited kidney disease and most patients were reported in East Asia. Although LPG is one of apoE related lipoprotein disorders, it affects predominantly in kidney and the histological features are dilated glomerular capillaries with lipoprotein thrombi. By genetic testing, several pathogenic APOE mutations of LPG have been reported. Most of the mutations are located close to LDL receptor binding site, however, mutations far from the LDL receptor binding site have also been reported. It is interesting to know whether different types of mutations or mutations in different domains are associated with the phenotypes of LPG. In our study, eight probands diagnosed with LPG were enrolled in Ruijin Hospital. By Sanger sequencing of APOE, we found three APOE mutations including APOE‐Kyoto (R25C), APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki (R158P) and APOE‐Chicago (R147P). For the first time we report APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki outside of Japan (Saito & Matsunaga, 2011). APOE‐Chicago was also first reported in Chinese LPG patients which was first reported in a male Mexican‐American patient (Sam et al., 2006) and later in a Japanese female patient (Kodera et al., 2017).

According to an extended study of patients with LPG (Hu et al., 2014), 27.7% LPG patients had a positive family history and the penetrance of APOE mutations was 55.6%. So our study validated the incomplete penetrance of LPG‐related APOE mutations as a similar value of 54.5%. These findings indicated that additional factors were involved in the induction of LPG such as the Fcg receptor (FcRg) deficiency (Ito et al., 2012; Kanamaru et al., 2002; Miyahara et al., 2012). Interestingly, we also found that higher blood pressure was associated with LPG compared to patients with nephrotic syndrome independent to other factors like age, sex, eGFR, Upro, TC, and TG. Studies also reported such phenomenon (Hu et al., 2014). One possible explanation might be that hypertension is due to endothelium injury caused by lipoprotein thrombi in glomerular capillary.

In addition, we found that patients with APOE mutations in the binding region of HSPG (within the LDL receptor binding region) had higher serum apoE levels. Among patients with LDL receptor binding site mutations, most of their mutations were in the binding region of HSPG. Patients with APOE mutations in the HSPG binding region had a trend of younger onset age, higher Upro, and higher TG, although not statistically significant. As serum apoE plays its role in lipid metabolism through the LDL receptor, the HSPG and LDL receptor‐related protein (LRP) pathway (Mahley & Rall Jr., 2000), mutations could alter the configuration of the APOE protein and further impact its binding ability to LDL receptor, which could explain the formation of lipoprotein thrombi in the glomerulus.

Only three mutations (APOE Okayama/Modena/Guangzhou) were inside the LDL receptor binding region and outside the binding region of HSPG, and they were all at position 150 at the protein level. We found that both APOE‐Okayama (R150G; Kinomura et al., 2008) and APOE‐Modena (R150C; Magistroni et al., 2013; Russi et al., 2009) were located on the ε2 allele, while APOE allele of APOE‐Guangzhou (R150P) was not reported (Luo et al., 2008). Almost all other mutations were located on the ε3 allele except for a new reported mutation APOE‐Toyonaka (Fukunaga et al., 2018; Hirashima et al., 2018). This interesting phenomenon may be explained by this reason: as is reported in APOE2 (variant ε2), due to the cysteine 158 substitution, aspartic acid 154 changes its ionic interaction with arginine 150 instead of arginine 158, disrupting LDL receptor binding significantly (Marais, 2019). These results indicate that the three mutations change the APOE three‐dimensional structure and lead to the disease. This finding is consistent with reports that mutations on APOE3 (variant ε3) of LPG induce thermodynamic destabilization and enhanced aggregation (Georgiadou et al., 2013; Katsarou, Stratikos, & Chroni, 2018). On the other hand, LPG is a heterogenous disease in pathology, especially the recently discovered mutation APOE‐Toyonaka with membranous nephropathy‐like kidney pathology (Fukunaga et al., 2018; Hirashima et al., 2018), suggesting that genetic factor is significant in LPG (Saito et al., 2020).

Though no effective treatment has been established, fibrates and ACEI/ARB may be effective for LPG remission (Arai et al., 2003; Ieiri, Hotta, & Taguma, 2003; Matsunaga et al., 2009). Different therapy effects of lipid‐lowering drugs and ACEI/ARB used in all the eight LPG patients indicated heterogeneity of the disease. Meanwhile, plasma exchange or blood lipid adsorption was performed in two patients and their Upro and serum lipid levels relieved only for a short time, so the effect of this treatment was uncertain as reported (Li et al., 2014; , Oikawa, Sato, & Sasaki, 1999). Furthermore, one patient received glucocorticoid treatment for more than three years and appeared to have steroid‐dependent nephrotic syndrome. Further work is required in consideration of the mutations and heterogeneity of each patient. At the same time, we found that patients in the proteinuria PR group had a slower renal function deterioration rate compared to that in NR group. Our results indicate that Upro during follow‐up might be an alternative marker for renal function deterioration in LPG patients, and further suggests that urine protein decreasing therapy in LPG patients might be crucial for delaying the progression of renal failure. There are some limitations in our study. Firstly, it is a small sample size study which limited the power to detect more correlations between genotypes and phenotypes. Second, we only performed Sanger sequencing on APOE, which may have lead lack pathogenetic mutations on other unknown genes. Finally, we did not carry out functional studies to reveal the mechanisms of these mutations.

Our study showed the essentiality of genetic testing for LPG. We associated APOE‐Osaka/Kurashiki (R158P) and APOE‐Chicago (R147P) in Chinese LPG patients for the first time. We found that LPG patients with urine protein remission had a slower renal function deterioration rate. Furthermore, literature review found mutations in different domains of APOE (within or out of the LDL receptor binding region) led to different serum apoE levels. These findings may help us to understand the pathogenic mechanism of LPG, and further indicate that the treatment of proteinuria might slow down renal function progression in these patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no other relevant financial interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

JX, MY, and QW were involved in the conception and design of the study and writing of the manuscript. XP, SY, JX, and XY were involved in the laboratory experiments and data interpretation. YL, YJ, and CZ were involved in genetic counseling. NC, XL, HR, and XP were involved in patient evaluations. HH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supporting information

Figure S1

Click here for additional data file. (39.7KB, pdf)

Table S1–S2

Click here for additional data file. (37.9KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81870460, 81570598, 81370015), Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No.17441902200), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (No.20152207), Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Multi‐Center Clinical Research Project (No: DLY201510), Shanghai Health and Family Planning Committee Hundred Talents Program (No:2018BR37), Shanghai Jiao Tong University “Jiaotong Star” Plan Medical Engineering Cross Research Key Project (No:YG2019ZDA18). The authors thank professor Wei Lin from the department of nephrology, Jiujiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi Jiujiang, China for providing us the pathology image of IgA staining on kidney tissue of the patient F16A1578 ‐II1.

Yang M, Weng Q, Pan X, et al. Clinical and genetic analysis of lipoprotein glomerulopathy patients caused by APOE mutations. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8:e1281 10.1002/mgg3.1281

Mingxin Yang and Qinjie Weng contributed equally to this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  1. Altman, D. , Machin, D. , Bryant, T. , & Gardner, M. (2000). Statistics with confidence. BMJ Books ISBN 0727913751. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arai, T. , Yamashita, S. , Yamane, M. , Manabe, N. , Matsuzaki, T. , Kiriyama, K. , … Matsuzawa, Y. (2003). Disappearance of intraglomerular lipoprotein thrombi and marked improvement of nephrotic syndrome by bezafibrate treatment in a patient with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Atherosclerosis, 169(2), 293–299. 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00194-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batal, I. , Fakhoury, G. , Groopman, E. , D'Agati, V. D. , & Morris, H. (2019). Unusual case of lipoprotein glomerulopathy first diagnosed in a protocol kidney allograft biopsy. Kidney Int Rep, 4(2), 350–354. 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.09.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennet, A. M. , Di Angelantonio, E. , Ye, Z. , Wensley, F. , Dahlin, A. , Ahlbom, A. , … Danesh, J. (2007). Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with lipid levels and coronary risk. JAMA, 298(11), 1300–1311. 10.1001/jama.298.11.1300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fukunaga, M. , Nagahama, K. , Aoki, M. , Shimizu, A. , Hara, S. , Matsunaga, A. , … Saito, T. (2018). Membranous nephropathy‐like apolipoprotein E deposition disease with apolipoprotein E toyonaka (Ser197Cys) and a homozygous apolipoprotein E2/2. Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis, 8(1), 45–55. 10.1159/000487919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Georgiadou, D. , Stamatakis, K. , Efthimiadou, E. K. , Kordas, G. , Gantz, D. , Chroni, A. , & Stratikos, E. (2013). Thermodynamic and structural destabilization of apoE3 by hereditary mutations associated with the development of lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Journal of Lipid Research, 54(1), 164–176. 10.1194/jlr.M030965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, J. , Pan, Y. , Chen, Y. , Li, X. , Xing, G. , Shi, J. , … Wang, H. (2010). Common apolipoprotein E gene mutations contribute to lipoprotein glomerulopathy in China. Nephron Clinical Practice, 114(4), c260–c267. 10.1159/000276578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirashima, H. , Komiya, T. , Toriu, N. , Hara, S. , Matsunaga, A. , Saito, T. , & Muso, E. (2018). A case of nephrotic syndrome showing contemporary presence of apolipoprotein E2 homozygote glomerulopathy and membranous nephropathy‐like findings modified by apolipoprotein E Toyonaka. Clinical Nephrology – Case Studies, 6, 45–51. 10.5414/CNCS109509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Z. , Huang, S. , Wu, Y. , Liu, Y. , Liu, X. , Su, D. , … Yang, Y. (2014). Hereditary features, treatment, and prognosis of the lipoprotein glomerulopathy in patients with the APOE Kyoto mutation. Kidney International, 85(2), 416–424. 10.1038/ki.2013.335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ieiri, N. , Hotta, O. , & Taguma, Y. (2003). Resolution of typical lipoprotein glomerulopathy by intensive lipid‐lowering therapy. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 41(1), 244–249. 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito, K. , Nakashima, H. , Watanabe, M. , Ishimura, A. , Miyahara, Y. , Abe, Y. , … Saito, T. (2012). Macrophage impairment produced by Fc receptor gamma deficiency plays a principal role in the development of lipoprotein glomerulopathy in concert with apoE abnormalities. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 27(10), 3899–3907. 10.1093/ndt/gfs329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kanamaru, Y. , Nakao, A. , Shirato, I. , Okumura, K. , Ogawa, H. , Tomino, Y. , & Ra, C. (2002). Chronic graft‐versus‐host autoimmune disease in Fc receptor gamma chain‐deficient mice results in lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 13(6), 1527–1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katsarou, M. , Stratikos, E. , & Chroni, A. (2018). Thermodynamic destabilization and aggregation propensity as the mechanism behind the association of apoE3 mutants and lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Journal of Lipid Research, 59(12), 2339–2348. 10.1194/jlr.M088732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kinomura, M. , Sugiyama, H. , Saito, T. , Matsunaga, A. , Sada, K. E. , Kanzaki, M. , … Makino, H. (2008). A novel variant apolipoprotein E Okayama in a patient with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 23(2), 751–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kodera, H. , Mizutani, Y. , Sugiyama, S. , Miyata, T. , Ehara, T. , Matsunaga, A. , & Saito, T. (2017). A case of lipoprotein glomerulopathy with apoE chicago and apoE (Glu3Lys) treated with fenofibrate. Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis, 7(2), 112–120. 10.1159/000478902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levey, A. S. , Stevens, L. A. , Schmid, C. H. , Zhang, Y. L. , Castro 3rd, A. F. , Feldman, H. I. , … Coresh, J. (2009). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Annals of Internal Medicine, 150(9), 604–612. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, W. , Wang, Y. , Han, Z. , Luo, C. , Zhang, C. , & Xiong, J. (2014). Apolipoprotein e mutation and double filtration plasmapheresis therapy on a new Chinese patient with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Kidney and Blood Pressure Research, 39(4), 330–339. 10.1159/000355810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Luo, B. , Huang, F. , Liu, Q. , Li, X. , Chen, W. , Zhou, S. F. , & Yu, X. (2008). Identification of apolipoprotein E Guangzhou (arginine 150 proline), a new variant associated with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. American Journal of Nephrology, 28(2), 347–353. 10.1159/000111828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Magistroni, R. , Bertolotti, M. , Furci, L. , Fano, R. A. , Leonelli, M. , Pisciotta, L. , … Calandra, S. (2013). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy associated with a mutation in apolipoprotein e. Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports, 6, 189–196. 10.4137/CCRep.S12209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahley, R. W. , & Rall Jr., S. C. (2000). Apolipoprotein E: Far more than a lipid transport protein. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 1, 507–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marais, A. D. (2019). Apolipoprotein E in lipoprotein metabolism, health and cardiovascular disease. Pathology, 51(2), 165–176. 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matsunaga, A. , Furuyama, M. , Hashimoto, T. , Toyoda, K. , Ogino, D. , & Hayasaka, K. (2009). Improvement of nephrotic syndrome by intensive lipid‐lowering therapy in a patient with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 13(6), 659–662. 10.1007/s10157-009-0207-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsunaga, A. , & Saito, T. (2014). Apolipoprotein E mutations: A comparison between lipoprotein glomerulopathy and type III hyperlipoproteinemia. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 18(2), 220–224. 10.1007/s10157-013-0918-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miyahara, Y. , Nishimura, S. , Watanabe, M. , Ito, K. , Nakashima, H. , & Saito, T. (2012). Scavenger receptor expressions in the kidneys of mice with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 16(1), 115–121. 10.1007/s10157-011-0554-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rovin, B. H. , Roncone, D. , McKinley, A. , Nadasdy, T. , Korbet, S. M. , & Schwartz, M. M. (2007). APOE Kyoto mutation in European Americans with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(24), 2522–2524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Russi, G. , Furci, L. , Leonelli, M. , Magistroni, R. , Romano, N. , Rivasi, P. , & Albertazzi, A. (2009). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy treated with LDL‐apheresis (Heparin‐induced Extracorporeal Lipoprotein Precipitation system): A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 3, 9311 10.1186/1752-1947-3-9311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Saito, T. , & Matsunaga, A. (2011). Significance of a novel apolipoprotein E variant, ApoE Osaka/Kurashiki, in lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 18(6), 542–543. 10.5551/jat.10165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Saito, T. , & Matsunaga, A. (2014). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy may provide a key to unlock the puzzles of renal lipidosis. Kidney International, 85(2), 243–245. 10.1038/ki.2013.404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saito T., Matsunaga A., Fukunaga M., Nagahama K., Hara S., Muso E. (2020). Apolipoprotein E–related glomerular disorders. Kidney International, 97(2), 279–288. 10.1016/j.kint.2019.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Saito, T. , Oikawa, S. , Sato, H. , & Sasaki, J. (1999). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy: Renal lipidosis induced by novel apolipoprotein E variants. Nephron, 83(3), 193–201. 10.1159/000045511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Saito, T. , Sato, H. , Kudo, K. , Oikawa, S. , Shibata, T. , Hara, Y. , … Sakaguchi, H. (1989). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy: Glomerular lipoprotein thrombi in a patient with hyperlipoproteinemia. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 13(2), 148–153. 10.1016/S0272-6386(89)80134-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sam, R. , Wu, H. , Yue, L. , Mazzone, T. , Schwartz, M. M. , Arruda, J. A. , … Singh, A. K. (2006). Lipoprotein glomerulopathy: A new apolipoprotein E mutation with enhanced glomerular binding. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 47(3), 539–548. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.12.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, H. , Yang, Y. , & Hu, Z. (2018). The novel apolipoprotein E mutation ApoE Chengdu (c.518TC, p. L173P) in a Chinese patient with lipoprotein Glomerulopathy. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 25(8), 733–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, B. , Liu, Z. H. , Zeng, C. H. , Zheng, J. M. , Chen, H. P. , & Li, L. S. (2008). Clinicopathological and genetic characteristics in Chinese patients with lipoprotein glomerulopathy. Journal of Nephrology, 21(1), 110–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Click here for additional data file. (39.7KB, pdf)

Table S1–S2

Click here for additional data file. (37.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES