Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2020 May 25;8(8):e1309. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1309

The role of sodium channels in sudden unexpected death in pediatrics

Anne M Rochtus 1,2,3, Richard D Goldstein 2,4, Ingrid A Holm 2,4,5, Catherine A Brownstein 2,4,5, Eduardo Pérez‐Palma 6,7, Robin Haynes 2,8, Dennis Lal 6,7,9, Annapurna H Poduri 1,2,9,✉
PMCID: PMC7434613  PMID: 32449611

Abstract

Background

Sudden Unexpected Death in Pediatrics (SUDP) is a tragic event, likely caused by the complex interaction of multiple factors. The presence of hippocampal abnormalities in many children with SUDP suggests that epilepsy‐related mechanisms may contribute to death, similar to Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy. Because of known associations between the genes SCN1A and SCN5A and sudden death, and shared mechanisms and patterns of expression in genes encoding many voltage‐gated sodium channels (VGSCs), we hypothesized that individuals dying from SUDP have pathogenic variants across the entire family of cardiac arrhythmia‐ and epilepsy‐associated VGSC genes.

Methods

To address this hypothesis, we evaluated whole‐exome sequencing data from infants and children with SUDP for variants in VGSC genes, reviewed the literature for all SUDP‐associated variants in VGSCs, applied a novel paralog analysis to all variants, and evaluated all variants according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines.

Results

In our cohort of 73 cases of SUDP, we assessed 11 variants as pathogenic in SCN1A, SCN1B, and SCN10A, genes with long‐standing disease associations, and in SCN3A, SCN4A, and SCN9A, VGSC gene paralogs with more recent disease associations. From the literature, we identified 82 VGSC variants in SUDP cases. Pathogenic variants clustered at conserved amino acid sites intolerant to variation across the VGSC genes, which is unlikely to occur in the general population (p < .0001). For 54% of variants previously reported in literature, we identified conflicting evidence regarding pathogenicity when applying ACMG criteria and modern population data.

Conclusion

We report variants in several VGSC genes in cases with SUDP, involving both arrhythmia‐ and epilepsy‐associated genes. Accurate variant assessment as well as future studies are essential for an improved understanding of the contribution of sodium channel‐related variants to SUDP.

Keywords: arrhythmia, epilepsy, sodium channel, sudden unexpected death

Sudden Unexpected Death in Pediatrics (SUDP) is a tragic event. We evaluated WES data from 73 cases and reviewed the literature for sodium channel variants in SUDP. We report variants in several sodium channel genes, involved in central nervous system and/or cardiac rhythm dysfunction.

graphic file with name MGG3-8-e1309-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Sudden Unexpected Death in Pediatrics (SUDP) encompasses a tragic set of conditions, including Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood (SUDC), affecting children under and over 1 year of age, respectively (Goldstein, Nields, & Kinney, 2017). These conditions are hypothesized to involve heterogeneous and multifactorial etiologies, conceptualized as a ‘triple‐risk’ model with a convergence of intrinsic, developmental, and environmental vulnerabilities contributing to death (Filiano & Kinney, 1994; Goldstein, Kinney, & Willinger, 2016).

Pathogenic variants in both arrhythmia‐ and epilepsy‐related voltage‐gated sodium channels (VGSCs) have been identified in association with sudden death, including SIDS, SUDC, and the related phenomenon Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) (Arnestad et al., 2007; Baruteau, Tester, Kapplinger, Ackerman, & Behr, 2017; Brownstein et al., 2018; Glengarry et al., 2014; Halvorsen et al., 2016; Howell et al., 2015; Johannesen et al., 2018; Kapplinger et al., 2010; Kato et al., 2014; Millat et al., 2009; Otagiri et al., 2008; Plant et al., 2006; Priori, Napolitano, Giordano, Collisani, & Memmi, 2000; Tester & Ackerman, 2005; Turillazzi et al., 2008; Veeramah et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Wedekind et al., 2001; Winkel et al., 2015). We have reported a range of developmental hippocampal malformations in greater than 40% of children with SIDS and SUDC (Kinney et al., 2015, 2016), including hippocampal lesions such as dentate bilamination that have been classically associated with temporal lobe epilepsy (Houser, 1990). These observations suggest that a subset of SIDS and SUDC is linked to epilepsy‐related mechanisms. The association between epilepsy and sudden death, demonstrated most clearly in Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP), may well extend to SUDP in cases with these hippocampal lesions in the absence of a history of overt epilepsy, conceptualized as ‘epilepsy in situ’ (Noebels, 2016) since infants and children with SIDS and SUDP by definition have not presented with a history of epilepsy. An example of a gene with many protean disease associations that has been associated with SIDS, SUDC, and SUDEP is SCN1A [MIM *182389], providing a specific contributing factor that links these entities (Bagnall et al., 2016; Bagnall, Crompton, & Semsarian, 2017; Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016).

While the terminal mechanisms of SUDP, including SUDEP, remain speculative (Devinsky, Hesdorffer, Thurman, Lhatoo, & Richerson, 2016; Massey, Sowers, Dlouhy, & Richerson, 2014), there is active investigation into the role of genetic factors involving genes related to epilepsy (Brownstein et al., 2018; Goldman et al., 2009) as well as cardiac arrhythmia (Bagnall et al., 2016; Baruteau et al., 2017) that may contribute to these untimely deaths. Given the identification of pathogenic SCN1A variants in individuals with SIDS, SUDC, and SUDEP, and given the known robust association between SCN5A [MIM *600163] and sudden death (Brugada syndrome), we sought to identify additional variants across the entire VGSC family of genes that encode for several brain‐ and cardiac‐expressed genes. The VGSCs are a highly conserved family of proteins – expressed in excitable tissue in the heart, central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and muscle – that are essential for the generation and propagation of action potentials. In humans, nine different pore‐forming α‐subunits have been identified (NaV1.1‐1.9 encoding for SCN1A‐SCN5A [MIM: SCN2A *182390; SCN3A *182391; SCN4A *603967] and SCN8A‐SCN11A [MIM: SCN8A *600702; SCN9A *603415; SCN10A *604427]) (Catterall, 2014). NaV1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.6 are the primary sodium channel subunits expressed in the central nervous system, NaV1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 in the peripheral nervous system, NaV1.4 in skeletal muscle, and NaV1.5 in the heart. The pore‐forming α‐subunit is composed of four homologous domains, each containing six transmembrane α‐helical segments (S1–S6). In addition, there are five β‐subunits (β1, β1B, β2, β3, and β4) encoded by SCN1B‐SCN4B [MIM: SCN1B *600235; SCN2B *601327; SCN3B *608214; SCN4B *608256] (Brackenbury & Isom, 2011). The tissue‐specific expression profiles of α‐subunits and β‐subunits are shown in Table 1. Variants in the cardiac‐expressed gene SCN5A (Arnestad et al., 2007; Baruteau et al., 2017; Glengarry et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2014; Millat et al., 2009; Otagiri et al., 2008; Plant et al., 2006; Priori et al., 2000; Tester & Ackerman, 2005; Turillazzi et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2014; Wedekind et al., 2001; Winkel et al., 2015) have been reported in association with SIDS and SUDC. Variants in other VGSCs are only rarely identified in cases with SIDS and SUDC: SCN1A (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016), SCN4A (Männikkö et al., 2018), SCN10A (Neubauer et al., 2017), SCN1B (Altshuler et al., 2012; Baruteau et al., 2017; Denti, n.d.; Hu et al., 2012; Neubauer et al., 2017), SCN3B (Tan et al., 2010; Winkel et al., 2015), and SCN4B (Tan et al., 2010). Variants in epilepsy‐associated VGSC genes expressed in the central nervous system have also been associated with SUDEP: SCN1A (Cooper et al., 2016; Gal et al., 2010), SCN2A (Howell et al., 2015; Myers et al., 2018), and SCN8A (Johannesen et al., 2018; Myers et al., 2018; Veeramah et al., 2012).

TABLE 1.

Voltage‐gated sodium channels expression and disease associations

Gene. Protein Distribution Associated human diseases
SCN1A Nav1.1 CNS, heart DS, GEFS+, FS+, familial autism, FHM3, SUDEP
SCN2A Nav1.2 CNS DS, GEFS+, OS, EOEE, BFNIS
SCN3A Nav1.3 CNS, heart Unclear, contributing to neuronal hyperexcitability/ epilepsy?
SCN4A Nav1.4 Skeletal muscle PAM, PMC, HyperPP, HypoPP, SNEL
SCN5A Nav1.5 Skeletal muscle, heart, CNS AF, AS, BS, DCM, LQTS, PCCD, SIDS, SSS, SUDEP
SCN8A Nav1.6 CNS, PNS EOEE, cognitive impairment, paralysis, ataxia, dystonia
SCN9A Nav1.7 PNS CIP, IEM, PEPD, PPN
SCN10A Nav1.8 PNS PPN
SCN11A Nav1.9 PNS PPN
SCN1B β1 CNS, PNS, heart, skeletal muscle AF, BS*, DS, GEFS+, PCCD, TLE
SCN2B β2 CNS, PNS, heart, skeletal muscle AF, BS*
SCN3B β3 CNS, PNS, heart, skeletal muscle AF, BS*, PCCD, SIDS, ventricular fibrillation
SCN4B β4 CNS, PNS, heart, skeletal muscle LQTS*, SIDS
SCN1B β1B Fetal CNS, PNS, heart, skeletal muscle BS*, PCCD, epilepsy
Open in a new tab

Modified with permission from Brunklaus, Ellis, Reavey, Semsarian, and Zuberi (2014).

Abbreviations: AF, Atrial fibrillation; AS, atrial standstill; BFNIS, benign familial neonatal‐infantile seizures; BS*, disputed evidence for BS (Hosseini et al., 2018);BS, Brugada syndrome; CIP, channelopathy‐associated insensitivity to pain; CNS, central nervous system; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; DS, Dravet syndrome; EOEE, early‐onset epileptic encephalopathy; FHM3, familial hemiplegic migraine type 3; FS+, febrile seizures plus; GEFS+, genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus; HyperPP, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis, HypoPP, hypokalemic periodic paralysis; IEM, inherited erythromelalglia; LQTS*, disputed evidence for LQTS (Adler et al., 2020); LQTS, long QT syndrome; OS, Ohtahara syndrome; PAM, potassium‐aggravated myotonia; PCCD, progressive cardiac conduction disease; PEPD, paroxysmal extreme pain disorder formally known as familial rectal pain syndrome; PMC, paramyotonia congenital; PNS, peripheral nervous system; PPN, painful peripheral neuropathies; SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome; SNEL, severe neonatal episodic laryngospasm; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; SUDEP, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy.

Given that VGSC genes are highly conserved in linear protein sequence and share essential functional domains across cardiac and neurologic tissues, we hypothesized a role for the entire family of VGSC genes in SUDP. We evaluated for the presence of variants in all VGSC genes using WES data from a cohort of 73 cases with SUDP; we applied a structure‐based assessment of all novel and reported variants in human VGSC in SUDP cases versus controls.

2. METHODS

2.1. Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Boston Children's Hospital (approval number P00011014), and informed written consent has been obtained from the parents of all cases included. Some cases were ascertained through the San Diego SIDS Registry, which included consent for research but did not allow recontact of families and did not obtain parental DNA.

2.2. Our SUDP cohort

DNA from 73 SUDP cases was obtained through the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), Boston, MA, and the Office of the Medical Examiner, San Diego, CA, using consent procedures in accordance with Massachusetts and California Law. These cases included 42 singletons, for whom parental samples were not available and for whom families could not be contacted, 28 trios consisting of probands and both parents, and 3 probands with one parent's sample available. All cases were sudden, unexpected deaths that remained unexplained after a complete autopsy and death scene investigation (Goldstein et al., 2017). DNA extracted from whole blood or saliva underwent capture for exome sequencing using either the Agilent SureSelect XTHuman All Exon v4 or Illumina Rapid Capture Exome enrichment kit (Broad Institute). Sequencing of 100 bp paired end reads was obtained using Illumina HiSeq (Illumina). Coverage was >90% or >80% meeting 20x coverage with the two methods, respectively. Our data analysis and variant calling methods have been described previously (Olson et al., 2017). We utilized the BCH (Boston Children`s Hospital) Connect Genomics Gateway integrated with the WuXi NextCODE analysis platform (Gudbjartsson et al., 2016) for variant interrogation and analysis.

For each case, we performed a targeted initial analysis to identify variants in genes encoding for the human VGSC subunits. Candidate pathogenic variants were evaluated according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria (Richards et al., 2015), including pathogenicity predictions from both Polyphen2 and SIFT and low population allele frequency (<0.001) according to the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) representing control individuals; while not all individuals in this database are disease‐free, they did not experience sudden death in infancy or childhood. Furthermore, given that the genes in question are known to have decreased penetrance, we did not require complete absence in gnomAD for pathogenicity. For cases with data from parental samples, we evaluated de novo versus inherited status of candidate variants of interest. For splicing variants, we used the splicing prediction score from Alamut Visual‐2.10, which incorporates the splicing tools MaxEnt, NNSPLICE, and HSF. We evaluated trios for de novo or inherited heterozygous variants, homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in any disease‐associated genes. We additionally evaluated all cases, including singletons, for potentially pathogenic variants in disease‐associated genes related to sudden death or cardiac arrhythmia.

2.3. Literature cohort

In order to identify additional cases for phenotypic comparison and to evaluate whether a given variant was novel or previously reported and whether there might be data supporting pathogenicity, we performed a literature search (PubMed, accessed June 2019, with search parameters “Sudden Infant Death” [Mesh] AND “Sodium Channels” [Mesh]) resulting in the identification of 49 studies. In addition, we searched the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/, accessed June 2019) for each of the VGSCs genes to identify any possible variants not found in the literature search, identifying 13 additional studies with cases of SIDS or SUDC and reported variants in sodium channel‐related genes.

2.4. Structural protein modeling

We used the human NaV1.7 (SCN9A) protein model described by Shen, Liu, Wu, Lei, and Yan (2019) and analyzed the position of the variants of our cohort along with additional variants identified through our literature search (Table S1). Three of our cases’ variants have been previously reported in literature (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016). We focused on exonic variants since intronic, splicing, and truncating variants cannot be annotated onto the three‐dimensional protein sequence. Illustrations were generated using PyMol.

2.5. In silico predictions

Functional prediction scores were obtained from the dbNSFP database version 3.5 (August 2017, http://varianttools.sourceforge.net/). In total, we used six pathogenicity prediction scores (SIFT, Polyphen‐2‐HVAR, Polyphen‐2‐HDIV, Mutation Assessor, FATHMM, and LRT). We classified a variant as “damaging” when the majority of the tools predicted a functional effect for the variant (i.e., a minimum of 4 of 6 tools). Splicing variants are considered “possibly damaging” or “damaging” when they have a likelihood of 50% or more to affect splicing, using the splicing prediction score from Alamut Visual‐2.10, calculated from the splicing tools MaxEnt, NNSPLICE, and HSF.

2.6. Parazscore

Based on the linear amino acid sequence of SCN9A (canonical transcript ENST00000409672, CCDS46441), we compared the position of 74 missense variants in all sodium channel alpha‐gene paralogs against variants found in the general population using gnomAD. We evaluated the amino acid gene‐family paralog conservation score using the Parazscore (Lal et al., 2017) (http://per.broadinstitute.org/), which leverages amino acid conservation across gene‐family members, assuming that conserved sites are more likely to be important for protein function and thus more likely to be present in cases than in controls (Brunklaus et al., 2020). Statistical comparison between the variant counts of cases versus gnomAD was conducted using a two‐tailed t test with nominal two‐sided p‐values < .05 considered significant.

2.7. Three‐dimensional mapping of amino acid substitutions in VGSC‐related genes

In order to assess for correlation across gene‐family paralogs, we compared the position of all missense variants in sodium channel alpha‐gene paralogs from our own cohort and from the literature onto a three‐dimensional NaV1.7 structure model. We used the human NaV1.7 structure model that is based on the cryo‐electron microscopy structures of the human NaV1.7‐ß1‐ß2 complex at overall resolutions of 3.2 angstroms (Shen et al., 2019).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Genetics and clinical characteristics of our cases

In our cohort of 73 SUDP cases, we identified from exome data a total of 45 variants in VGSC genes, 11 of which (present in 10 cases) were predicted to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic (n = 6), or VUS (n = 5) applying ACMG criteria (Richards et al., 2015) (Table 2). No additional heterozygous, homozygous, or compound heterozygous variants were present that provided an explanation for sudden death in these individuals. Age of death across the 10 cases with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in VGSC genes ranged from 7 weeks to 8 years, with 9/10 (90%) individuals younger than 6 months at the time of death. Seven had hippocampal malformations as assessed by detailed neuropathological examination, and one had a normal hippocampus. For the other two, material was not available for detailed neuropathological analysis. Clinical and molecular data for all 10 cases are listed in Table 2. Neuropathological examination of an abnormal dentate gyrus is illustrated in Figure 1. Case 1 had two variants in SCN1A (p.Leu1296Met and p.Glu1308Asp) (reported previously) (Brownstein et al., 2018), Case 4 had a variant in SCN3A (p.Ala1804Val) and in SCN10A (c.4386+1G>C), and two siblings (Cases 9 and 10) carried the same variant in SCN1B (p.Trp179Ter) (unknown whether inherited from a parent with a germline or mosaic variant as parental DNA is unavailable). None of the cases in our cohort had a diagnosis of epilepsy. Case 3 had a history of atypical febrile seizures. Cases 5 and 6 each had an inherited variant in SCN4A (p.Lys724Arg and p.Phe103Val, respectively); neither variant‐bearing parent had reported history of muscle disease or muscle twitching. None of the individuals in our cohort was reported to have had cardiac arrhythmia. We did not identify pathogenic variants in the cardiac‐expressed SCN5A gene in our cohort or in the epilepsy‐associated genes SCN2A and SCN8A.

TABLE 2.

Variants in voltage‐gated sodium channel genes in our cohort

Gene Case cDNA, protein AF Pathogenicity prediction Parazscore ACMG Inheritance, zygosity Age HC Additional notes
SCN1A 1 3886T>A, L1296M 8.17E‐06 PP‐2, 0.979; SIFT, 0.001 0.49 P

N/A,

het, in cis with E1308D

 7 weeks Abnormal DG (Brownstein et al., 2018)
1 3924A>T, E1308D 0.0006416 PP‐2, 0.727; SIFT, 0.281 −1.23 LP

N/A,

het, in cis with L1296M

 7 weeks
2 2045G>T, G682V 4.07E‐06 PP‐2, 0.478; SIFT, 0.003 −1.48 LP

N/A,

het

 2 months Abnormal DG (Brownstein et al., 2018)
3 182T>C, L61P 0 PP‐2, 0.783; SIFT, 0 1.23 LP

N/A,

het

 20 months End‐folium sclerosis Atypical FS
SCN3A 4 5411C>T, A1804V 2.44E‐05 PP‐2, 0.998; SIFT, 0 −0.49 VUS

N/A,

het

 4 months N/A
SCN4A 5 2171A>G, K724R 0 PP‐2, 0.953; SIFT, 0.001 0.25 P

Inh,

het

 5 months Normal Megalencephaly, bilateral open opercula, bilateral small STG, chronic hemorrhages, acute HIE
6 307T>G, F103V 2.03E‐05 PP‐2, 0.73; SIFT, 0.001 −0.25 VUS

Inh,

het

 3 months Abnormal DG Megalencephaly, mild gliosis of CWM, CerWM, inferior olive, tegmentum
SCN9A 7 5624G>A, R1875Q 1.62E‐05 PP‐2, 0.734; SIFT, 0 0 VUS

Inh,

het

 8 years Abnormal DG Cytomegaly in RF, Chiari malformation 1
SCN10A 4 4,386 + 1G>C 1.22E‐05 splicing (100%) N/A VUS

N/A,

het

 4 months N/A
8 305C>G, S102C 4.07E‐06 PP‐2, 0.701; SIFT, 0.002 −0.25 VUS

Inh,

het

 3 months 22 days Abnormal DG Megalencephaly
SCN1B 9 536G>A, W179* 8.19E‐06 nonsense N/A LP

N/A,

het

 4 months Abnormal DG Megalencephaly
10 536G>A, W179* 8.19E‐06 nonsense N/A LP

N/A,

het

 2 months N/A Megalencephaly
Open in a new tab

For splicing variants, we used the splicing prediction score from Alamut Visual‐2.10, which incorporates the splicing tools MaxEnt, NNSPLICE, and HSF. Variants highlighted in bold affect the same paralog position. Cases 1, 2, and 3 have been reported previously (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016). Cases 9 and 10 are siblings.

Transcripts used: SCN1A (NM_001165963.1), SCN3A (NM_0006922.3), SCN4A (NM_000334.3), SCN5A (NM_198056.2), SCN9A (NM_002977.3), SCN10A (NM_006514.2), SCN1B (NM_199037.4), SCN3B (NM_018400.3), and SCN4B (NM_174934.3).

Abbreviations: ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; AF, allele frequency according to gnomAD; CerWM, cerebellar white matter; CWM, cerebral white matter; DG, dentate gyrus; FS, febrile seizures; HC, hippocampus; het, heterozygous; HIE, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; inh, inherited; LP, likely pathogenic; N/A, not available; P, pathogenic; PP‐2, Polyphen 2; RF, reticular formation; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant; STG, superior temporal gyrus; VUS, variant of unknown significance.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Hippocampal developmental lesions in an infant with SIDS (Case 6 with SCN4A c.307T>G, p.Phe103Val variant). (a) Control dentate gyrus in an age‐matched infant showing the normal single layer of dentate gyrus granule cells in a row rectangle (H&E, X4). (b) Low‐power photograph of the hippocampus shows an abnormal dentate gyrus with a region of focal bilamination highlighted in the black rectangle (H&E, X4). (c) Enlarged detail of control dentate gyrus (H&E, X10). (d) Enlarged detail of focal dentate gyrus bilamination with two layers of granule cells (H&E, X10. DG, dentate gyrus; H&E, hematoxylin & eosin stain; ML, molecular layer). SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

3.2. Cases from the literature

We reviewed all variants in VGSC genes that have been reported in the literature in infants and children with SIDS and SUDC. We identified 82 variants in 103 individuals, with 6 harboring two variants and 12 variants recurring in 39 cases, affecting 81 different amino acid positions in the following genes: SCN1A (n = 3), SCN4A (n = 6), SCN5A (n = 62), SCN10A (n = 4), SCN1B (n = 3), SCN3B (n = 3), and SCN4B (n = 1). The two variants recurring most frequently were identified in SCN5A: c.3578G>A (R1193Q) and c.1700T>A (L567Q), occurring in 8 and 7 cases, respectively.

3.3. Paralog conservation of pathogenic or likely pathogenic VGSC variants from our cohort and all variants in the literature

Collectively, we identified a total of 90 unique VGSC variants (Table S1), 11 from our cohort and 82 from the literature (3 overlapping) affecting 89 different amino acid positions in the following genes: SCN1A (n = 4), SCN3A (n = 1), SCN4A (n = 8), SCN5A (n = 62), SCN9A (n = 1), SCN10A (n = 6), SCN1B (n = 4), SCN3B (n = 3), and SCN4B (n = 1). Interestingly, variants in the epilepsy‐associated genes SCN2A and SCN8A were not observed in our cohort or in the SUDP literature cases.

To assess whether some regions of the VGSCs tolerate variation, we evaluated for clustering of variants in analogous locations across the VGSCs using the Parazscore (Lal et al., 2017). As expected, Parazscores from patient (case) variants were significantly higher than those observed in gnomAD (unpaired t test, p < .0001). Variants that were determined to be (likely) pathogenic with the prediction tools were more likely to be located at paralog conserved amino acid positions (Fisher exact, p = .03) (i.e., greater Parazscores) (Figure 2a). On the other hand, variants that we determined to be conflicting or benign with the prediction scores were more likely present in less conserved regions (Fisher's exact test, p = .0001) (Figure 2b). Interestingly, 25 variants involved the 'alignment index position' of a VGSC variant reported in disease (Table S2), which is unlikely to occur in the general population (p < .0001). Overall, we observed significant clustering of variants at conserved amino acid sites, notably with the same amino acid affected between SCN1A/SCN5A and SCN5A/SCN9A (Table S2). The variants of two cases (Cases 6 and 8) in our cohort affected the same paralog position: SCN4A (p.Phe103Val) and SCN10A (p.Ser102Cys) (p < .0001). Both had died at 3 months of age and had pathology notable for hippocampal granule cell dispersion with dentate gyrus bilamination (Table 2); both variants were inherited from a parent who had no history of epilepsy, febrile seizures, or other major illness. Two other cases from our cohort (Cases 1 and 7) had variants affecting the same paralog position at SCN1A/SCN5A and SCN5A/SCN9A, respectively. Interestingly, neuropathological examination in both cases revealed dentate gyrus bilamination (Figure 1, Table 2 and Table S2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

SCN case variant evolutionary conservation and population constrained assessment. The SCN case variant paralog conservation score (Parazscore) is shown across the linear protein sequence. Parazscore values range from negative values, representing less conservation at a given amino acid position, to positive values, representing high conservation, with the highest value depicting identical amino acids are present in all related proteins. Variants in our cohort are marked with a *. (a) The Parazscore is shown for SCN variants that are predicted to be pathogenic. (b) The Parazscore is shown for SCN variants that are predicted to be conflicting

3.4. Re‐evaluation of cases from the literature

Given our observation that several variants, particularly those from the literature, had conflicting or benign scores, we re‐assessed the 82 variants from the literature using the same criteria applied to our cases; we classified 30 variants in 35 cases, with 5 variants occurring in multiple individuals, as pathogenic or likely pathogenic using ACMG criteria (Richards et al., 2015) (Table S1). Evaluation of variants in the literature with respect to allele frequency reported in the gnomAD database revealed 14/82 variants (17%) in 31/103 individuals (30%) with an allele frequency higher than or equal to 0.001, arguing against their pathogenicity. Thirteen variants in 30 cases were classified as benign or likely benign using ACMG criteria.

In addition, we also evaluated published functional studies and used six pathogenicity prediction scores to classify the variants. Of the 82 variants reported in literature, we determined that 34 variants (34/82 = 41%) in 55 individuals (55/103 = 53%) had conflicting evidence of pathogenicity, and 1 of 82 (1%) was determined to be benign based on the high frequency in controls, lack of predicted functional effect in silico, and/or in vivo absence of functional effects resulting from the variants (Table S1). Notably, the two most commonly recurring variants in SCN5A (c.3578G>A, R1193Q and c.1700T>A, L567Q) were assessed as benign using ACMG criteria and as conflicting according to pathogenicity prediction scores and functional studies. Overall, for 56/103 (54%) variants reported in literature in cases of sudden death, we identified conflicting evidence of pathogenicity.

3.5. Variant position and pathogenicity

Variants predicted to be pathogenic were more likely to be localized in the transmembrane regions of the protein than variants predicted to be conflicting or benign (p = .03). Variants localized in the transmembrane regions have been associated with severe channel dysfunction (Wallace et al., 2003) (Table S1, Figure S1).

4. DISCUSSION

From our cohort of 73 cases with SUDP, we identified 11 variants predicted to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic (n = 6), or VUS (n = 5) in genes encoding for VGSC subunits expressed in the brain and/or in the heart, including two individuals who each had 2 variants. Among the 11 cases, 7 had hippocampal abnormalities but no history of epilepsy, 1 (Case 3) had a history of atypical febrile seizures. None had a history of cardiac arrhythmia or other cardiac presentation prior to death. While SCN1A (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016) and SCN1B (Altshuler et al., 2012; Baruteau et al., 2017; Denti, n.d.; Neubauer et al., 2017) have strong prior associations with epilepsy, arrhythmia, and sudden death, and SCN4A (Männikkö et al., 2018) a recent association with sudden death, we additionally observed variants in the SCN paralogs SCN3A, SCN9A, and SCN10A that have yet to be conclusively associated with sudden death. Surprisingly, we did not identify pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in SCN5A in our cohort; this contrasts with the 84/103 (82%) of SIDS cases reported in literature with variants in this gene, but we also observed that 47/84 (56%) of SCN5A variants reported in literature had conflicting evidence for pathogenicity when evaluated using modern data and criteria. On the other hand, 4/12 (33%) of our cohort's variants compared to 3/82 (4%) variants identified in cases from the literature carried a variant in SCN1A, three of them recently reported (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016). It is possible that these differences are due to differences in ascertainment as well as differences between past and current methods of variant assessment. Notably, we did not identify variants within SCN2A and SCN8A genes, two genes previously associated with epilepsy and SUDEP (Howell et al., 2015; Myers et al., 2018).

We identified in our literature review 82 variants in 103 cases with SIDS, SIDS‐like presentations, or SUDC affecting 81 different amino acid positions in a VGSC‐related gene. The majority of variants (62/82, 76%) were present in SCN5A, reflecting in some cases the fact that this gene was specifically targeted in some series (Ackerman et al., 2004; Glengarry et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2014; Millat et al., 2009; Otagiri et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2014; Wedekind et al., 2001; Winkel et al., 2015). Since many of the VGSC variants reported in SIDS or SUDC were described before the current era of variant interpretation guidelines, we re‐evaluated all the variants reported in literature with this in mind. Next‐generation sequencing resulted in an exponential growth of identified variants, but clinical classification of variants is still in its early stages. In a surprisingly high number of reported variants (54%), conflicting evidence argued against pathogenicity using current ACMG criteria. While these results may challenge the conclusions of individual studies, correct classification and reclassification of variants based on evolving supportive evidence is important over time.

Analysis of the relatively modest number of variants in our cohort, coupled with a larger number from the literature, suggested that those variants we determined to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic by other metrics were most likely to be located in critical domains of the sodium channel protein – for example, transmembrane domains. Alternatively, variants in control populations were randomly distributed throughout the genes.

Variants considered pathogenic are enriched in conserved regions across gene family members. We had hypothesized that variants in VGSC genes at certain conserved positions might be associated with a risk for sudden death, independent of the tissue where the relevant gene is most highly expressed. This is illustrated by two cases in our cohort, each with a variant in SCN4A or SCN10A at the same paralog position (Cases 6 and 8) and 24 other variants from the literature that affect a paralog variant that is known to be disease associated (Table S2). When considering variant pathogenicity in a newly implicated VGSC gene, the position in the protein, with respect to paralogous proteins already implicated in sudden death, can provide additional evidence suggesting pathogenicity.

Ultimately, while all of these factors are taken into consideration when assessing pathogenicity, robustly conducted experimental evidence with adequate positive and negative control data should ultimately be sought when there is question regarding pathogenicity. While SCN5A (Arnestad et al., 2007; Baruteau et al., 2017; Glengarry et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2014; Millat et al., 2009; Otagiri et al., 2008; Plant et al., 2006; Priori et al., 2000; Tester & Ackerman, 2005; Turillazzi et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2014; Wedekind et al., 2001; Winkel et al., 2015), SCN1B (Altshuler et al., 2012; Baruteau et al., 2017; Denti, n.d.; Hu et al., 2012; Neubauer et al., 2017), and more recently SCN1A (Brownstein et al., 2018; Halvorsen et al., 2016) have been considered SUDP‐associated genes, larger cohort studies will be required to more securely implicate the broader range of VGSC‐related genes as part of the multirisk model leading to SUDP. In addition, future studies that can incorporate trio sequencing, in which parental DNA can be made available to determine whether variants are de novo and thus more likely to be pathogenic with respect to a severe phenotype like sudden death, will contribute to our understanding of the role of this family of genes to sudden death. Initial studies in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)‐derived neurons and mouse models of SCN1A, traditionally associated with epilepsy, suggested cardiac and/or respiratory mechanisms of death (Auerbach et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2018). Additional in vitro and in vivo studies of the sodium channel gene family will move us toward understanding the mechanisms through which variants in sodium channel‐encoding genes contribute to sudden death.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of a SUDP cohort and the present literature on sodium channel variants in SUDP cases, using population‐ and protein structure‐based predictive models, revealed variants across the VGSC subunit family of sodium channel genes. Importantly, in our cohort, these variants were identified in children without prior histories of epilepsy or unprovoked seizures, and only one with a history of seizures that were atypical febrile seizures, yet with hippocampal abnormalities and without history or family history of cardiac arrhythmia. In addition, using recent guidelines for variant interpretation, we observed that the majority of SUDP variants reported in the previous literature do not have enough evidence to be classified as pathogenic. Variant assessment using current ACMG guidelines will improve variant interpretation and prediction of pathogenicity.

Overall, similar to prior studies, variants predicted to be pathogenic were more likely to cluster at conserved amino acid sites intolerant to variation, in the individual genes and across the VGSC genes. Therefore, the position of a variant in a VGSC gene, with respect to paralogous proteins already implicated in SUDP, can provide clues toward underlying pathogenicity. These findings provide evidence that sodium channel abnormalities contribute to the complex phenotype in SUDP involving central nervous system and/or cardiac rhythm dysfunction. Future functional studies into the function of the sodium channels will elucidate the mechanisms through which variants in these genes underlie some cases of sudden death and may contribute to a framework in which early testing can be used to stratify infants and children at risk.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

A.M.R., R.D.G., and A.H.P. contributed to the conception and design of the study; all authors were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and/or drafting the article or revising it critically.

Supporting information

Fig S1

Click here for additional data file. (1.4MB, pdf)

Table S1‐S2

Click here for additional data file. (33.3KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to all of the families who participated and continue to participate in research on SIDS, SUDC, and SUDEP. We are deeply indebted to Dr. Hannah C. Kinney and her dedication to Robert's Program; her neuropathological analysis of SIDS and SUDC case samples provided a major contribution to the present study. We thank Kalen Fletcher for facilitating enrollment of families through Robert's Program at Boston Children's Hospital.

Rochtus AM, Goldstein RD, Holm IA, et al. The role of sodium channels in sudden unexpected death in pediatrics. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8:e1309 10.1002/mgg3.1309

Funding information

A.M.R. is supported by a Fellowship of the Belgian American Educational Foundation (http://www.baef.be/documents/home.xml), by a Fulbright Program grant sponsored by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the United States Department of State and administered by the Institute of International Education (https://www.cies.org), and by an internal fund of the University of Leuven (PDM/17/195). We are also grateful for support from the Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy Isaiah Stone Award (https://www.cureepilepsy.org) (A.M.R., R.D.G., A.H.P.) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R21HD096355‐01, I.A.H., C.A.B., R.D.G., A.H.P.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Raw data were not deposited but may be available by contacting the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. Ackerman, M. J. , Splawski, I. , Makielski, J. C. , Tester, D. J. , Will, M. L. , Timothy, K. W. , … Curran, M. E. (2004). Spectrum and prevalence of cardiac sodium channel variants among black, white, Asian, and Hispanic individuals: Implications for arrhythmogenic susceptibility and Brugada/long QT syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, 1(5), 600–607. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler, A. , Novelli, V. , Amin, A. S. , Abiusi, E. , Care, M. , Nannenberg, E. A. , Gollob, M. H. (2020). An international, multicentered, evidence‐based reappraisal of genes reported to cause congenital long QT syndrome. Circulation, 141(6), 418–428. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altshuler, D. M. , Durbin, R. M. , Abecasis, G. R. , Bentley, D. R. , Chakravarti, A. , Clark, A. G. , … Lacroute, P. (2012). An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature, 491(7422), 56–65. 10.1038/nature11632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnestad, M. , Crotti, L. , Rognum, T. O. , Insolia, R. , Pedrazzini, M. , Ferrandi, C. , … Schwartz, P. J. (2007). Prevalence of long‐QT syndrome gene variants in sudden infant death syndrome. Circulation, 115(3), 361–367. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Auerbach, D. S. , Jones, J. , Clawson, B. C. , Offord, J. , Lenk, G. M. , Ogiwara, I. , … Isom, L. L. (2013). Altered cardiac electrophysiology and SUDEP in a model of dravet syndrome. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagnall, R. D. , Crompton, D. E. , Petrovski, S. , Lam, L. , Cutmore, C. , Garry, S. I. , … Semsarian, C. (2016). Exome‐based analysis of cardiac arrhythmia, respiratory control, and epilepsy genes in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Annals of Neurology, 79(4), 522–534. 10.1002/ana.24596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagnall, R. D. , Crompton, D. E. , & Semsarian, C. (2017). Genetic basis of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Frontiers in Neurology, 8(JUL), 1–9. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baruteau, A. E. , Tester, D. J. , Kapplinger, J. D. , Ackerman, M. J. , & Behr, E. R. (2017). Sudden infant death syndrome and inherited cardiac conditions. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 14(12), 715–726. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brackenbury, W. J. , & Isom, L. L. (2011). Na+ channel β subunits: Overachievers of the ion channel family. Frontiers in Pharmacology, SEP(September), 1–11. 10.3389/fphar.2011.00053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brownstein, C. A. , Goldstein, R. D. , Thompson, C. H. , Haynes, R. L. , Giles, E. , Sheidley, B. , … Poduri, A. H. (2018). SCN1A variants associated with sudden infant death syndrome. Epilepsia, 59(4), (April), e56–e62. 10.1111/epi.14055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brunklaus, A. , Du, J. , Steckler, F. , Ghanty, I. I. , Johannesen, K. M. , Fenger, C. D. , … Lal, D. (2020). Biological concepts in human sodium channel epilepsies and their relevance in clinical practice. Epilepsia, 61(3), 387–399. 10.1111/epi.16438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brunklaus, A. , Ellis, R. , Reavey, E. , Semsarian, C. , & Zuberi, S. M. (2014). Genotype phenotype associations across the voltage‐gated sodium channel family. Journal of Medical Genetics, 51(10), 650–658. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Catterall, W. A. (2014). Structure and function of voltage‐gated sodium channels at atomic resolution. Experimental Physiology, 99(1), 35–51. 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.071969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cooper, M. S. , Mcintosh, A. , Crompton, D. E. , McMahon, J. M. , Schneider, A. , Farrell, K. , … Scheffer, I. E. (2016). Mortality in Dravet syndrome. Epilepsy Research, 128, 43–47. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Denti, F. , Bentzen, B. H. , Wojciak, J. , Thomsen, N. M. , Scheinman, M. , Schmitt, N. (2018). Multiple genetic variations in sodium channel subunits in a case of sudden infant death syndrome. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 41(6), 620–626. 10.1111/pace.13328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Devinsky, O. , Hesdorffer, D. C. , Thurman, D. J. , Lhatoo, S. , & Richerson, G. (2016). Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. The Lancet Neurology, 15(10), 1075–1088. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30158-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Filiano, J. J. , & Kinney, H. C. (1994). A perspective on neuropathological findings in victims of the sudden infant death syndrome: The triple‐risk model. Biology of the Neonate, 65(3–4), 194–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gal, L. , Korff, C. M. , Monso‐hinard, C. , Mund, M. T. , Morris, M. , Malafosse, A. , & Schmitt‐mechelke, T. (2010). A case of SUDEP in a patient with Dravet syndrome with SCN1A mutation. Epilepsia, 51(9), 1915–1918. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02691.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Glengarry, J. M. , Crawford, J. , Morrow, P. L. , Stables, S. R. , Love, D. R. , & Skinner, J. R. (2014). Long QT molecular autopsy in sudden infant death syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(7), 635–640. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldman, A. M. , Glasscock, E. , Yoo, J. , Chen, T. T. , Klassen, T. L. , & Noebels, J. L. (2009). Arrhythmia in heart and brain: KCNQ1 mutations link epilepsy and sudden unexplained. Science Translational Medicine, 1(2), 2–6. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldstein, R. D. , Kinney, H. C. , & Willinger, M. (2016). Sudden Unexpected Death in Fetal Life Through Early Childhood. Pediatrics, 137(6), e20154661–e20154661. 10.1542/peds.2015-4661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldstein, R. D. , Nields, H. M. , & Kinney, H. C. (2017). A new approach to the investigation of sudden unexpected death. Pediatrics, 140(2), 1–5. 10.1542/peds.2017-0024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guðbjartsson, H. , Georgsson, G. F. , Guðjónsson, S. A. , Valdimarsson, R. �. , Sigurðsson, J. H. , Stefánsson, S. K. , … Stefánsson, K. (2016). GORpipe: A query tool for working with sequence data based on a Genomic Ordered Relational (GOR) architecture. Bioinformatics, 32(20), 3081–3088. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Halvorsen, M. , Petrovski, S. , Shellhaas, R. , Tang, Y. , Crandall, L. , Goldstein, D. , & Devinsky, O. (2016). Mosaic mutations in early‐onset genetic diseases. Genetics in Medicine, 18(7), 746–749. 10.1038/gim.2015.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hosseini, S. M. , Kim, R. , Udupa, S. , Costain, G. , Jobling, R. , Liston, E. , … Gollob, M. H. ; National Institutes of Health Clinical Genome Resource Consortium . (2018). Reappraisal of reported genes for sudden arrhythmic death. Circulation. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Houser, C. R. (1990). Granule cell dispersion in the dentate gyrus of humans with temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Research, 535(2), 195–204. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91601-C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Howell, K. B. , McMahon, J. M. , Carvill, G. L. , Tambunan, D. , Mackay, M. T. , Rodriguez‐Casero, V. , … Scheffer, I. E. (2015). SCN2A encephalopathy: A major cause of epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures. Neurology, 85(11), 958–966. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, D. , Barajas‐Martínez, H. , Medeiros‐Domingo, A. , Crotti, L. , Veltmann, C. , Schimpf, R. , … Antzelevitch, C. (2012). A novel rare variant in SCN1Bb linked to Brugada syndrome and SIDS by combined modulation of Nav1.5 and Kv4.3 channel currents. Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, 9(5), 760–769. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Johannesen, K. M. , Gardella, E. , Scheffer, I. , Howell, K. , Smith, D. M. , Helbig, I. , … Rubboli, G. (2018). Early mortality in SCN8A‐related epilepsies. Epilepsy Research, 143(April), 79–81. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kapplinger, J. D. , Tester, D. J. , Alders, M. , Benito, B. , Berthet, M. , Brugada, J. , … Ackerman, M. J. (2010). An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A‐encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, 7(1), 33–46. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kato, K. , Makiyama, T. , Wu, J. , Ding, W.‐G. , Kimura, H. , Naiki, N. , … Horie, M. (2014). Cardiac channelopathies associated with infantile fatal ventricular arrhythmias: From the cradle to the bench. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 25(1), 66–73. 10.1111/jce.12270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, Y. Jr. , Bravo, E. , Thirnbeck, C. K. , Smith‐Mellecker, L. A. , Kim, S. H. , Gehlbach, B. K. , … Richerson, G. B. (2018). Severe peri‐ictal respiratory dysfunction is common in dravet syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 128(3), 1141–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kinney, H. C. , Cryan, J. B. , Haynes, R. L. , Paterson, D. S. , Haas, E. A. , Mena, O. J. , … Armstrong, D. D. (2015). Dentate gyrus abnormalities in sudden unexplained death in infants: Morphological marker of underlying brain vulnerability. Acta Neuropathologica, 129(1), 65–80. 10.1007/s00401-014-1357-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kinney, H. C. , Poduri, A. H. , Cryan, J. B. , Haynes, R. L. , Teot, L. , Sleeper, L. A. , … Goldstein, R. D. (2016). Hippocampal formation maldevelopment and sudden unexpected death across the pediatric age spectrum. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 75(10), 981–997. 10.1093/jnen/nlw075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lal, D. , May, P. , Perez‐Palma, E. , Samocha, K. E. , Kosmicki, J. A. , Robinson, E. B. , … Daly, M. J. (2020). Gene family information facilitates variant interpretation and identification of disease‐associated genes in neurodevelopmental disorders. Genome Medicine, 12 (1), 10.1186/s13073-020-00725-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Männikkö, R. , Wong, L. , Tester, D. J. , Thor, M. G. , Sud, R. , Kullmann, D. M. , … Matthews, E. (2018). Dysfunction of NaV1.4, a skeletal muscle voltage‐gated sodium channel, in sudden infant death syndrome: A case‐control study. The Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30021-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Massey, C. A. , Sowers, L. P. , Dlouhy, B. J. , & Richerson, G. B. (2014). Mechanisms of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: The pathway to prevention. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(5), 271–282. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Millat, G. , Kugener, B. , Chevalier, P. , Chahine, M. , Huang, H. , Malicier, D. , … Rousson, R. (2009). Contribution of long‐QT syndrome genetic variants in sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatric Cardiology, 30(4), 502–509. 10.1007/s00246-009-9417-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Myers, K. A. , Bello‐Espinosa, L. E. , Symonds, J. D. , Zuberi, S. M. , Clegg, R. , Sadleir, L. G. , Buchhalter, J. , & Scheffer, I. E. (2018). Heart rate variability in epilepsy: A potential biomarker of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy risk. Epilepsia, 59(7), 1372–1380. 10.1111/epi.14438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Neubauer, J. , Lecca, M. R. , Russo, G. , Bartsch, C. , Medeiros‐Domingo, A. , Berger, W. , & Haas, C. (2017). Post‐mortem whole‐exome analysis in a large sudden infant death syndrome cohort with a focus on cardiovascular and metabolic genetic diseases. European Journal of Human Genetics, 25(4), 404–409. 10.1038/ejhg.2016.199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Noebels, J. (2016). Hippocampal abnormalities and sudden childhood death. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 12(2), 198–199. 10.1007/s12024-016-9768-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Olson, H. E. , Kelly, M. K. , LaCoursiere, C. M. , Pinsky, R. , Tambunan, D. , Shain, C. , … Poduri, A. (2017). Genetics and genotype–phenotype correlations in early onset epileptic encephalopathy with burst suppression. Annals of Neurology, 81(3), 419–429. 10.1002/ana.24883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Otagiri, T. , Kijima, K. , Osawa, M. , Ishii, K. , Makita, N. , Matoba, R. , … Hayasaka, K. (2008). Cardiac ion channel gene mutations in sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatric Research, 64(1530‐0447 (Electronic)), 482–487. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181841eca [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Plant, L. D. , Bowers, P. N. , Liu, Q. , Morgan, T. , Zhang, T. , State, M. W. , … Goldstein, S. A. N. (2006). A common cardiac sodium channel variant associated with sudden infant death in African Americans, SCN5A S1103Y. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116(2), 430–435. 10.1172/JCI25618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Priori, S. G. , Napolitano, C. , Giordano, U. , Collisani, G. , & Memmi, M. (2000). Brugada syndrome and sudden cardiac death in children. The Lancet, 355(9206), 808–809. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05277-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Richards, S. , Aziz, N. , Bale, S. , Bick, D. , Das, S. , Gastier‐Foster, J. , … Rehm, H. L. (2015). Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genetics in Medicine, 17(5), 405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shen, H. , Liu, D. , Wu, K. , Lei, J. , Yan, N. (2019). Structures of human Nav1.7 channel in complex with auxiliary subunits and animal toxins. Science, 363(6433), 1303–1308. 10.1126/science.aaw2493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tan, B.‐H. , Pundi, K. N. , Van Norstrand, D. W. , Valdivia, C. R. , Tester, D. J. , Medeiros‐Domingo, A. , … Ackerman, M. J. (2010). Sudden infant death syndrome‐associated mutations in the sodium channel beta subunits. Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, 7(6), 771–778. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tester, D. J. , & Ackerman, M. J. (2005). Sudden infant death syndrome: How significant are the cardiac channelopathies? Cardiovascular Research, 67(3), 388–396. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Turillazzi, E. , La Rocca, G. , Anzalone, R. , Corrao, S. , Neri, M. , Pomara, C. , … Fineschi, V. (2008). Heterozygous nonsense SCN5A mutation W822X explains a simultaneous sudden infant death syndrome. Virchows Archiv, 453(2), 209–216. 10.1007/s00428-008-0632-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Veeramah, K. R. , O'Brien, J. E. , Meisler, M. H. , Cheng, X. , Dib‐Hajj, S. D. , Waxman, S. G. , … Hammer, M. F. (2012). De novo pathogenic SCN8A mutation identified by whole‐genome sequencing of a family quartet affected by infantile epileptic encephalopathy and SUDEP. American Journal of Human Genetics, 90(3), 502–510. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wallace, R. H. , Hodgson, B. L. , Grinton, B. E. , Gardiner, R. M. , Robinson, R. , Rodriguez‐Casero, V. , … Scheffer, I. E. (2003). Sodium channel alpha1‐subunit mutations in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy and infantile spasms. Neurology, 61(6), 765–769. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000086379.71183.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, D. , Shah, K. R. , Um, S. Y. , Eng, L. S. , Zhou, B. O. , Lin, Y. , … Tang, Y. (2014). Cardiac channelopathy testing in 274 ethnically diverse sudden unexplained deaths. Forensic Science International, 237, 90–99. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wedekind, H. , Smits, J. P. P. , Schulze‐Bahr, E. , Arnold, R. , Veldkamp, M. W. , Bajanowski, T. , … Haverkamp, W. (2001). De novo mutation in the SCN5A gene associated with early onset of sudden infant death. Circulation, 104(10), 1158–1164. 10.1161/hc3501.095361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Winkel, B. G. , Yuan, L. , Olesen, M. S. , Sadjadieh, G. , Wang, Y. , Risgaard, B. , … Jespersen, T. (2015). The role of the sodium current complex in a nonreferred nationwide cohort of sudden infant death syndrome. Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, 12(6), 1241–1249. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig S1

Click here for additional data file. (1.4MB, pdf)

Table S1‐S2

Click here for additional data file. (33.3KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Raw data were not deposited but may be available by contacting the authors.

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES