Skip to main content
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal logoLink to Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
letter
. 2020 Aug 19;20(5):211–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.08.004

Bradyarrhythmias in patients with COVID-19: A case series

Mohit D Gupta a, Arman Qamar b, Girish MP a, Safal Safal a, Vishal Batra a, Deepak Basia a, Sunil K Mandal a, Jamal Yusuf a, Saibal Mukhopadhyay a, Ankit Bansal a,
PMCID: PMC7434619  PMID: 32822746

Abstract

Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can have variety of cardiac manifestations; however, less is known about the prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of bradyarrhythmias in patients with COVID-19. In the present case series of bradyarrhythmia in patients with COVID-19, we report complete heart block requiring intervention in 5 patients and sinus node dysfunction in 2 patients.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: COVID-19, Coronarvirus disease 2019


Several cardiovascular complications of Coronarvirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) including myocardial infarction, myocarditis, stroke, tachyarrhythmias and pulmonary embolism have been reported during the current pandemic. However, less is known about the prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of bradyarrhythmias in patients with COVID-19 [1].

We report a case series of 7 patients with COVID-19 who presented with bradyarrhythmias. Of them, 5 had complete heart block and 2 had sick sinus syndrome. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1 The patients were aged between 45 and 80 years. Out of these 3 were women. 2 patients had history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or myocardial infarction and 1 had a history of heart failure. None of the patients were on calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, digoxin or anti-arrhythmic drugs at baseline. In addition, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, remdesivir or convalescent plasma was not given to any of the patients for treatment of COVID-19.

Table 1.

Characteristics of COVID-19 patients with bradyarrhythmias.

Characteristics Pt. 1 Pt. 2 Pt. 3 Pt. 4 Pt. 5 Pt. 6 Pt. 7
Age, years 55 56 67 80 45 55 69
Sex
Female
Female
Male
Male
Female
Male
Male
Medical History
 Diabetes Mellitus Yes No Yes No No No No
 Hypertension No No Yes Yes No No No
 Prior Myocardial Infarction No No No Yes No Yes No
 Prior Heart Failure
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Clinical Presentation
 Syncope Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
 Fever No Yes Yes No No No No
 Cough No No Yes No No No No
 Dyspnea No No Yes Yes No No No
 Heart rate (bpm) 40 32 30 42 36 33 40
 Escape rhythm Ventricular Ventricular Ventricular Ventricular Junctional Junctional Junctional
 Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 120 100 110 200 130 90 116
 Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 60 60 70 110 80 60 76
 Oxygen Saturation
98
97
98
98
98
99
98
Laboratory/Imaging Evaluation
 White blood count (cells/mm3) 11,800 11,200 7400 8100 5200 17,300 8400
 Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio 75/20 75/22 76/22 63/19 65/27 84/11 71/12
 Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.6 0.6 1.4 0.8 0.6 1.5 1.3
 Serum Na mmol/litre) 138 136 104 136 138 143 134
 Serum K (mmol/litre) 4.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 4.0 4.8 3.9
 High-sensitive Troponin T (Upper limit of normal <0.014) 0.011 0.003 0.014 0.006 0.007 0.018 ND
 NT Pro BNP (pg/ml) 157 143.5 3814 1515 2206 677.4 ND
 hsCRP (mg/litre) 57.1 48.38 81.72 106.7 395.83 74.25 ND
 Ferritin (ng/ml) 80.5 280 327 460 520 81.4 ND
 Infiltrates on Chest-X ray Absent Unilateral Bilateral Bilateral Bilateral Absent Bilateral
 LVEF (%) 60 60 60 50 60 60 40
Bradyarrhythmia CHB CHB CHB CHB SSS CHB SSS
Time from presentation to pacemaker implantation 14 days 12 days 12 days 15 days ND 17 days ND

CHB: complete heart block, SSS: sick sinus syndrome, ND: Not done, Pt.: Patient.

All of the seven patients presented within 24–48 hours of symptom onset. Of these, 5 presented with recent onset syncope and 2 with presyncope. However, only 2 patients had history of fever. All patients were hemodynamically stable and none had hypoxia. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated lymphopenia in all patients and 1 had leucocytosis. High-sensitivity Troponin T levels were mildly elevated in 1 patient and N-terminal-pro hormone BNP (NT-proBNP) levels were elevated in 4 patients. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was elevated in all patients except one and 4 patients had elevated levels of ferritin. Chest X-ray showed infiltrates in five patients. All the patients had bradycardia with a maximum heart-rate of 42 bpm. The escape rhythm was ventricular in 4 out of 5 patients with complete heart block and rest of the patients had junctional escape rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in 5 patients, while 2 had LVEF ≤ 50%. In view of symptomatic bradycardia and the uncertainty of clinical course of COVID-19, these patients received emergent temporary transvenous pacing. All these patients were strictly monitored for reversion of sinus rhythm, requirement of back up pacing and ventricular arrhythmias for 10–14 days. Five patients with pacing dependent and symptomatic complete heart block, underwent dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantations approximately 2 weeks after the presentation, with the use of personal protective equipment as per the guidelines of our institution. Two patients with sick sinus syndrome patients were kept under medical follow-up.

COVID-19 has been associated with development of cardiac dysfunction in patients with or without underlying cardiac condition [1]. In this largest case series of bradyarrhythmia in patients with COVID-19, we report complete heart block requiring intervention in 5 patients and sinus node dysfunction in 2 patients. There have been few isolated reports of development of clinically significant bradycardia in few patients with COVID-19 [2,3]. A recent publication reported sinus node dysfunction in 2 patients with COVID-19, both of whom remained in sinus bradycardia after discharge. Another publication reported a solitary case of transient complete heart block in a critically ill patient who died from pulmonary complications of COVID-19 [2,3]. In present series, none of the patient had any reversible cause of complete heart block.

A definitive mechanism for the development of bradyarrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 has not been established yet. Furthermore, it is not known if the virus for COVID-19 has any affinity for the receptors in the myocardial conduction system. As myocarditis has been reported in many patients with COVID-19, it is plausible that myocardial inflammation and injury may affect the conduction system resulting in complete heart block [4]. Autopsies of patients who died secondary to COVID-19 have showed the presence of viral RNA in cardiac myocytes and endothelial cells suggesting direct involvement of the myocardium in this disease. The COVID-19 virus may enter the cardiac myocytes via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor resulting in myocardial inflammation and injury [5]. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a definite non-invasive test for myocarditis is currently unavailable at our medical centre due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, since only 1 patient in our case series had an elevated high-sensitive troponin T, a marker of myocardial injury, we expect that the majority of these patients did not have myocarditis.

In conclusion, patients with COVID-19 may be observed for possible bradyarrhythmias. While, there is no definitive evidence of causality.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Indian Heart Rhythm Society.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.08.004.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

figs1.

figs1

figs2.

figs2

References

  • 1.Fried J.A., Ramasubbu K., Bhatt R. The variety of cardiovascular presentations of COVID-19. Circulation. 2020;141(23):1930–1936. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peigh G., Leya M.V., Baman J.R., Cantey E.P., Knight B.P., Flaherty J.D. Novel coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) associated sinus node dysfunction: a case series. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa132. ytaa132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azarkish M., Laleh Far V., Eslami M., Mollazadeh R. Transient complete heart block in a patient with critical COVID-19. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(22):2131. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Driggin E., Madhavan M.V., Bikdeli B. Cardiovascular considerations for patients, health care workers, and health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2352–2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oudit G.Y., Kassiri Z., Jiang C. SARS-coronavirus modulation of myocardial ACE2 expression and inflammation in patients with SARS. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009;39(7):618–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02153.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES