Abstract
Microorganisms are associated with the eggs of many animals. For some hosts, the egg serves as the ideal environment for the vertical transmission of beneficial symbionts between generations, while some bacteria use the egg to parasitize their hosts. In a number of animal groups, egg microbiomes often perform other essential functions. The eggs of aquatic and some terrestrial animals are especially susceptible to fouling and disease since they are exposed to high densities of microorganisms. To overcome this challenge, some hosts form beneficial associations with microorganisms, directly incorporating microbes and/or microbial products on or in their eggs to inhibit pathogens and biofouling. Other functional roles for egg-associated microbiomes are hypothesized to involve oxygen and nutrient acquisition. Although some egg-associated microbiomes are correlated with increased host fitness and are essential for successful development, the mechanisms that lead to such outcomes are often not well understood. This review article will discuss different functions of egg microbiomes and how these associations have influenced the biology and evolution of animal hosts.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘The role of the microbiome in host evolution’.
Keywords: host–microbe interactions, microbiome, eggs, defensive symbioses, symbiont transmission
1. Introduction
Microorganisms have had a profound influence on the development and evolution of animals and plants [1]. A number of animal model systems are currently being studied in order to understand how symbiotic associations are established and maintained and the effects of microbial colonization on developmental processes [2]. Microbiota impact their hosts in many ways, including influencing proper development of the digestive and immune systems, supporting nutrition, and providing unique metabolic capabilities [1]. Many studies have focused on how symbioses influence the long-term development and health of animals and the molecular mechanisms by which these associations are established, but for some hosts, microbes can have significant impacts from the earliest stages of development, in the egg (figure 1).
Figure 1.
Examples of functions associated with egg microbiomes from different animal groups. Egg-associated microbes are linked to diverse interactions in different hosts. In some associations, the egg facilitates transmission of symbionts between generations. Egg microbiota can provide antimicrobial defence from fouling and/or pathogenic microbes, protection from predation, and detoxification, and play nutritional or other metabolic roles. Some egg microbiomes are correlated with improved host development or fecundity, although the mechanisms are not well understood. In other systems, egg microbiota have been described but functional roles remain unknown.
The origin of eggs was a critical step in animal evolution, possibly to facilitate internal self-organizational processes to allow differentiation of cells and tissues [3]. Since the egg serves as such an essential site of embryogenesis, it may seem counterintuitive that some animals form associations with microorganisms in such a critical microenvironment. Although symbiont associations with eggs have been mostly studied in the context of vertical transmission processes between host generations, egg microbiota do serve other roles. This review article will focus on some of the functional roles of egg microbiomes and discuss how studying such associations may reveal ways in which these microbiota have influenced the evolution of animals.
2. Functional roles of egg microbiomes
(a). Facilitating transmission between generations and developmental effects on hosts
Many animals that foster endosymbionts use vertical transmission via the egg as a mechanism to ensure the transfer of microorganisms that often perform critical functions for the host. This transmission of symbionts occurs either in the egg (transovarial), on or near eggs, or directly associated with larvae that are released into the environment [4,5]). For many intracellular endosymbiotic associations, vertical transmission inside the egg ensures successful transfer of symbionts that provide critical nutritional functions for their hosts. Some examples include the bacteria Buchnera aphidicola, which provide essential amino acids for pea aphids [6], the phyotosynthetic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium in some coral species [7,8] and the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria associated with the gills of vesicomyid and solemyid clams at hydrothermal vents and seeps, respectively [9,10]. Other animals transfer symbionts through the colonization of embryos that are deposited with eggs. Adult Eisenia earthworms deposit Verminephrobacter and a small consortium of other bacteria into egg capsules where they then colonize extracellular spaces of developing nephridia in embryos [11–13].
For some associations, the symbiont may influence the developmental process in the host to specifically facilitate transmission. For example, stinkbugs use a number of strategies to transfer gut symbionts vertically between generations. In Megacopta punctatissima, the behaviour of nymphs can be influenced by the numbers of midgut symbionts (‘Candidatus Ishikawaella capsulata’) that are successfully transmitted from capsules that are associated with egg masses [14,15]. Nymphs that have sufficient numbers of symbionts enter a quiescent stage while those with low numbers or no symbionts are active and ‘wander’, presumably as an adaptation to facilitate colonization. Cynid stinkbugs of the genus Adomerus engage in maternal care where females smear symbiont-containing secretions onto eggs that help transfer symbionts. Aposymbiotic stinkbugs generated by surface sterilization of eggs resulted in animals with several fitness defects [5]. A study of pentaomid stinkbugs from Costa Rica found that in Sibaria englemani, midgut symbionts are transferred via egg smearing of the chorion during oviposition, and nymphs from surface-sterilized eggs had delayed developmental responses in growth and caeca morphology [16]. The authors also proposed that egg-smearing strategies in insects might allow the introduction of other bacteria or symbiont replacement from the environment.
The water flea Daphnia magna has served as a model crustacean for ecology and more recently has been studied in the context of its microbiome. Daphnia are capable of generating eggs via parthenogenesis that can then be sampled and are amenable to experimental manipulation. Daphnia eggs may also have a resting state where they are covered in a thick case called an ephippium that allows them to remain in the environment for extended periods of time (up to years) and under stressful conditions (e.g. extreme desiccation and anoxia). A study that manipulated surface bacteria from Daphnia eggs using chemical or antibiotic treatment led to decreased fecundity in animals raised bacteria-free [17]. Daphnia often contain bacteria within their eggs, but surprisingly, environmental epibiotic bacteria associated with the surface of the egg appear necessary for proper development and reproduction of the host [18,19]. How these environmental bacteria positively influence Daphnia is unknown but it has been proposed that they may benefit the host during variable environmental conditions.
Among vertebrates, vertical transmission of symbionts may also be important in some cases. A recent study of four bird species and a lizard species used culture-independent techniques to detect in ovo microbiota that the authors hypothesize may serve as a reservoir for the vertical transmission of gut symbionts in some oviparous vertebrates [20], while a study of woodlarks and skylarks did not find evidence for transmission of gut bacteria from egg shell surfaces [21]. A number of fish species are known to engage in egg–bacteria interactions during embryogenesis. Spawning brown trout have a core microbiome dominated by Flavobacterium and host genetics appears to influence composition of the egg microbiota [22,23]. Although a function for the egg microbiome has not been demonstrated, a more diverse microbiota was correlated with longer developmental times [23]. In coho salmon, epibiotic bacteria associated with eggs may be involved with later gastrointestinal colonization after hatching [24]. Syngathid fishes (pipefish and sea horses) are known for evolving male pregnancy where eggs are transferred to males and are carried in paternal brood pouches. Analyses of the microbiome of the maternal ovaries, eggs and paternal brood pouch of the pipefish Syngnathus typhle identified distinct microbiomes in ovaries and eggs that shifted in late stage embryos in the paternal pouch [25]. The authors suggest that immune priming may help shape the brood pouch microbiome and have long-term developmental consequences in preventing infection by pathogens. In other species, pathogens may also cause a number of developmental abnormalities or kill animal eggs, but in the red-eyed tree frog, fungal infections can accelerate development, leading to early hatching of and better survival outcomes for tadpoles [26].
Some endosymbiotic bacteria are also known as reproductive parasites of arthropods and use vertical transmission to ensure successful infection of animal hosts [27]. Among the best studied of these are Wolbachia bacteria, which are transmitted in the egg and can have profound developmental effects on their hosts [28]. Wolbachia spp. use different strategies in ovo to promote successful maternal inheritance between generations and manipulate host biology. These strategies include feminization, parthenogenesis, male killing, and cytoplasmic incompatibility [29]. Other types of bacteria in this category are members of the Spiroplasma spp., which are vertically transmitted and can lead to both positive and negative outcomes in different insect hosts [30]. Like other reproductive parasites, some strains cause male killing in their hosts [31,32]. The development of robust experimental host models such as Drosophila melanogaster has led to a number of key advances in recent years that have shed light on the molecular mechanisms of cytoplasmic incompatibility [33] and male killing [34] along with ways in which Wolbachia and Spiroplasma use host cellular machinery to facilitate transmission through oocytes (e.g. manipulating host actin, microtubules and yolk uptake machinery) [35–37].
(b). Defensive symbioses
In some animals, symbionts also serve important defensive roles in the egg in order to protect developing embryos. This can be especially important for animals that lay eggs in environments where microorganisms are abundant (e.g. 106 bacteria ml−1 in coastal seawater to 1010 bacteria g−1 in terrestrial soil and marine sediments [38]. One of the challenges that many animals that lay their eggs in microbe-rich environments face is that successful embryogenesis depends on minimizing fouling by microorganisms and/or infection by pathogens [39]. Given that embryogenesis can take days to weeks, mechanisms must exist to prevent biofoulers and pathogens that may harm developing embryos. To overcome these threats, some animals use the help of beneficial microorganisms that are associated with eggs [39–43].
In terrestrial environments, a number of insect species use defensive symbioses to provide protection of eggs from potential pathogenic microorganisms associated with soil deposition [43]. Lagria beetles have accessory glands containing Burkholderia bacteria that are deposited on the surfaces of eggs, where they produce antimicrobial compounds that protect larvae from fungal infections [44,45]. The European beewolf digger wasp, Philanthus triangulum, incorporates a cocktail of antimicrobial compounds derived from Streptomyces bacteria into its cocoon to protect larvae from fungal and bacterial infections during a long developmental period that can take up to 9 months [46–48]. Bacteria associated with the surface of eggs of the housefly (Musca domestica) can suppress growth of fungi that may outcompete housefly embryos for nutrition in dung piles [49,50]. Bacteria can have antipredatory effects on insect eggs as well. In Paederus sp. beetles, Pseudomonas bacteria produce a toxin (the polyketide pederin) that prevents predation from wolf spiders. A study using fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that female Paederus riparius smear a biofilm of the symbiont around the egg during oviposition [51]. Larvae that hatch from eggs that lack pederin are more susceptible to predation [52,53]. Although not extensively studied, egg microbiomes have also been described for aquatic insects of the Chironomidae (chironomids) where bacteria associated with egg masses may protect larvae from heavy metals [54] while also serving as a probiotic for emerging larvae, which feed on the egg jelly after hatching [55].
Many crustaceans brood their young, and females can carry eggs for extended periods of time during embryogenesis. A few studies have analysed these eggs for associated microbiota and a functional role in egg defence. In the American lobster, Homarus americanus, gravid females brood their eggs on their exteriors for an extended period of 9–16 months. With such a prolonged embryogenesis, females may lose 30–50% of their egg clutch to fouling and disease, including to the fungal pathogen Lagenidium callinectes [56]. The eggs of H. americanus are thought to be partially protected by the production of 4-hydroxyphenethyl alcohol (tyrosol) from unidentified bacteria associated with the eggs [57]. The eggs of the brooding shrimp Palaemon macrodactylus are protected from fungal infection by Altermonas bacteria through the production of 2,3-indolinedione (isatin), which inhibits L. callinectes [42], while epibiotic bacteria associated with the eggs of the sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa protect against a different fungus, Lagenidium myophilium [58].
Among cephalopods, some squid and cuttlefish species harbour a bacterial consortium in the accessory nidamental gland (ANG), part of the female reproductive system [59–62]. The bacterial consortium is deposited into the jelly coat of egg cases before being laid in the environment, where embryos develop for weeks without parental care. Although the ANG symbiosis was first described over a hundred years ago [63], few studies have addressed the function of the association. Work in some species suggests that the symbionts may protect developing embryos from pathogens and fouling microorganisms [41,64]. The Hawaiian bobtail squid, Euprymna scolopes, is a model animal host for studying interactions with beneficial bacteria [65]. Numerous studies have focused on understanding the mechanisms that confer specificity during the environmental transmission of the light organ symbiont Vibrio fischeri [66,67]. Recent work has also investigated the ANG consortium, describing the bacterial community and its function [41,61,68–70]. In E. scolopes, the ANG contains mainly Alphaproteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia, along with members of the Gammaproteobacteria and Flavobacteriia [61,69]. Bacteria from the ANG are deposited into multiple egg jelly layers, which are separated by a membrane-like structure [61,69]. Symbiont community analysis revealed that the ANG bacterial consortium of a given female bobtail squid reflects the eggs of its clutches, adding evidence that bacteria found in eggs come from the ANG, although females must acquire symbionts from the environment each generation [69]. A recent study also demonstrated that the ANG consortium protects eggs from fungi in E. scolopes [41]. Eggs treated with antibiotics were fouled by the fungus Fusarium keratoplasticum, and cultured ANG strains and chemical extracts were able to inhibit three different strains of F. keratoplasticum as well as the yeast Candida albicans. Molecular network analysis also identified antimicrobial compounds that may be involved with egg defence, including lincomycin, mycinamycin-like compounds and a suite of glycerophosphocholines. In addition to fungi, ANG bacteria can also inhibit other bacteria. Leisingera sp. JC1, a symbiotic strain isolated from the eggs of E. scolopes, produces a compound, indigoidine, and has antimicrobial activity against a number of marine vibrios [71]. Antibacterial activity has also been described from ANG symbionts of the eastern longfin inshore squid, Doryteuthis pealei [72].
Among vertebrates, the defensive role of egg microbiomes has been studied in some bird and fish species. In hoopoe birds, bacteria from the uropygial gland are transferred in a secretion to specialized crypts on the surfaces of eggs during oviposition, where they are hypothesized to protect embryos from infection [73,74]. In lake sturgeon, predictable bacterial communities colonize the surfaces of eggs and have the ability to inhibit other bacteria, including the formation of biofilms [75,76]. Infection of fish eggs by pathogens is of growing concern in aquaculture. An analysis of eggs from the Atlantic salmon at fish farms in Scotland showed that the presence of actinobacterial species on salmon eggs decreased attachment of the oomycete fungal-like pathogen Saprolegnia, and actinobacterial isolates also inhibited the pathogen in vitro [77].
(c). Nutritional and metabolic roles
Even though many symbionts that are important for the nutritional requirements of adult host stages are passed through the egg to the next generation (see above), data from a few systems suggest egg microbiomes may also contribute to have nutritional or metabolic roles embryos. For example, bacteria associated with the eggs of Drosophila melanogaster are responsible for producing the fermentation product acetoin, which can then have behavioural effects on larval food preference [78]. An analysis of the microbiome of different body sites and developmental stages of the deep-sea yeti crab, Kiwa puravida, found a diverse bacterial community associated with eggs, some members of which were also found in juvenile and adult stages, with a developmental shift from Gammaproteobacteria to Epsilonproteobacteria [79]. Examination of eggs associated with the hydrothermal vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata also showed a similar shift in the microbiota [80]. In R. exoculata, bacterial abundance increased on egg surfaces during embryogenesis, and environmental recruitment of symbiotic lineages of bacteria associated with adult stages has been described [81]. For both the yeti crab and vent shrimp, the egg microbiota include methanotrophic bacteria, although whether there are metabolic or other functional roles for members of these egg communities is still unclear.
The yellow-spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum, forms a symbiotic association with the photosynthetic alga Oophila ambylstomatis. Female salamanders deposit their eggs during the springtime in parts of North America in shallow pools. Within hours after deposition, eggs are colonized by O. ambylstomatis, which enters the jelly layers of the eggs. These intracapsular algae quickly divide in the egg and are capable of providing oxygen to the embryos, where diffusion is limited [82]. Eggs with more algae promoted quicker embryo growth and development, and it has been proposed that fixed carbon is transported to the embryos [83,84]. If algae are removed from the eggs, embryo development is negatively impacted [85]. The algae engaged in this ectosymbiosis appear to benefit from nitrogenous compounds excreted by the host [83,86]. Some of these algae are also capable of invading embryonic tissues, the only known example of intracellular algae colonizing a vertebrate [87]. A transcriptomic study of host cells with and without the algae suggests that these intracellular algae are not engaged in photosynthesis and instead are undergoing fermentation [88,89]. An analysis of innate immune gene expression also suggests that some aspects of the host immune response may be attenuated in cells that contain O. ambylstomatis, perhaps to help facilitate tolerance/maintenance of these endosymbionts or to prime the immune system. Although there is evidence that some vertical transmission may occur between O. ambylstomatis and A. maculatum [87], it is unclear how frequently these events happen.
3. Future questions
Although many strides have been made in understanding how microbes influence the biology of animals during development and contribute to health and disease, less is understood about the functions that microbes play in eggs during embryogenesis. Several exciting areas of research may come from studying egg microbiomes. For example, in many systems it is unclear to what extent embryo exposure to microbes or microbial products influences later developmental processes and host outcomes, although these mechanisms are better understood in the reproductive parasites of insects [33,34,90]. Interactions between eukaryotic hosts and microorganisms are often mediated via pattern recognition receptors that interact with microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) [91]. Host interactions with MAMPs can have a major influence on developmental processes. For example, in the squid–vibrio symbiosis, exposure of the host to a derivative of bacterial peptidoglycan (tracheal cytotoxin) along with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leads to apoptosis and regression of a superficial ciliated epithelium that is involved with recruitment of the light organ symbiont V. fischeri [92,93]. In many animal eggs, embryos have a chorion that may prevent microbes from directly interacting with host cells. However, MAMPs, small microbial metabolites and viruses may still be able to reach the embryo. There are several examples of MAMPs and bacterial metabolites entering eukaryotic cells and tissues and influencing organs or cells that are removed from the primary location of those microbes (e.g. short chain fatty acids produced by bacteria in the mammalian gut [94]). In humans, a number of pathogens are capable of causing congenital disease by breaching the placental barrier, including Zika virus, HIV, Toxoplasmosis gondii and Listeria monocytogenes [95]. Although not egg-associated, these examples from mammalian pathogens demonstrate that microbes are able to breach host embryonic barriers that normally would protect developmental processes.
Another open question is how do eggs/hosts select for functional symbionts while preventing non-specific microbes from colonization? For animals that have dedicated organs for housing symbionts that contribute to egg deposition, the mechanisms may be more easily characterized, especially in systems in which the partners can be manipulated, e.g. in Lagria beetles and cephalopod ANGs. For many associations, recruitment of bacterial symbionts from the environment relies on specific host–symbiont signalling, as with Rhizobia bacteria and leguminous plants [96] . In other associations, instead of a single ‘lock and key’ mechanism, multifactorial host and symbiont factors help ensure specificity. In the well-studied squid–vibrio association, mechanisms that lead to successful colonization of the light organ include a combination of symbiont factors (e.g. biofilm formation, motility, chemotaxis, responses to oxidative stress) and host processes (e.g. mucus secretion, immune system interactions, bio-chemical and biomechanical processes) [66,67]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to specificity of symbionts in eggs may also reveal why egg microbiomes are more prevalent in some animal lineages. For example, endosymbiosis is a widely adopted strategy among insects and has contributed to the evolutionary success of this group [97]. Successful transfer of symbionts from somatic cells to the germline is critical for the host. Studying how endosymbionts are transferred from somatic cells such as bacteriocytes to oocytes has revealed different mechanisms among insects, including symbiont exocytosis into the oocyte [98] as well as whole bacteriocyte transfer [99], the latter of which includes dramatic changes in cellular behaviour and gene expression patterns [100]. Do similar mechanisms exist in other animal lineages that have endosymbiotic bacteria and vertical transmission, for example, in corals and chemosynthetic invertebrates? Development of experimental model systems in diverse hosts will hopefully allow such comparisons. For eggs with epibionts where the symbionts are recruited directly from the environment, the mechanisms of egg colonization are less clear. Perhaps, as has been suggested for the egg microbiome of Daphnia, colonization by environmental microbes instead of vertical transmission from mother to egg provides Daphnia more flexibility to select from a diverse reservoir of bacteria, which allows the host to adapt to variable environmental conditions [18,19].
Many of the associations discussed here demonstrate how selection pressures on both hosts and symbionts have likely led to egg microbiomes that produce antimicrobial products or provide other benefits for their hosts. The wide distribution of defensive symbioses associated with eggs suggests that this is a function that has evolved multiple times in animals. As more defensive symbioses are described from terrestrial and aquatic environments, it is likely that a broader diversity of microbes and compounds that are used for egg defence will be revealed. However, there may be a number of other functions for egg microbiomes that have yet to be discovered. In associations where transfer of beneficial symbionts to the juvenile and adult stages improves developmental outcomes for the host (e.g. greater growth, fecundity, and/or disease resistance), the mechanisms by which these symbionts confer these traits are often poorly understood. In recent years, technological advances have allowed the characterization of host-associated microbiomes (e.g. 16S rRNA community analysis and multi-omics techniques). Applying such methods coupled with the development of more diverse experimentally tractable model associations will help reveal the range of egg–microbiome interactions and the influence of these symbioses on animal biology and evolution.
Data accessibility
This article has no additional data.
Competing interests
The author has no competing interests
Funding
This review was motivated by research funded by NSF IOS-1 557 914 to S.V.N.
References
- 1.McFall-Ngai M, et al. 2013. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3229–3236. ( 10.1073/pnas.1218525110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Douglas AE. 2019. Simple animal models for microbiome research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 764–775. ( 10.1038/s41579-019-0242-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Newman SA. 2011. Animal egg as evolutionary innovation: a solution to the ‘embryonic hourglass’ puzzle. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 316B, 467–483. ( 10.1002/jez.b.21417) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bright M, Bulgheresi S. 2010. A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 218–230. ( 10.1038/nrmicro2262) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hosokawa T, Hironaka M, Inadomi K, Mukai H, Nikoh N, Fukatsu T. 2013. Diverse strategies for vertical symbiont transmission among subsocial stinkbugs. PLoS ONE 8, e65081 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0065081) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Douglas AE. 1998. Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43, 17–37. ( 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.17) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hartmann AC, Baird AH, Knowlton N, Huang D. 2017. The paradox of environmental symbiont acquisition in obligate mutualisms. Curr. Biol. 27, 3711–3716. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baird AH, Guest JR, Willis BL. 2009. Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 551–571. ( 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120220) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cary SC, Giovannoni SJ. 1993. Transovarial inheritance of endosymbiotic bacteria in clams inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5695–5699. ( 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5695) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Russell SL, McCartney E, Cavanaugh CM. 2018. Transmission strategies in a chemosynthetic symbiosis: detection and quantification of symbionts in host tissues and their environment. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20182157 ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.2157) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davidson SK, Stahl DA. 2006. Transmission of nephridial bacteria of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 769–775. ( 10.1128/AEM.72.1.769-775.2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Davidson SK, Stahl DA. 2008. Selective recruitment of bacteria during embryogenesis of an earthworm. ISME J. 2, 510–518. ( 10.1038/ismej.2008.16) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davidson SK, Powell RJ, Stahl DA. 2010. Transmission of a bacterial consortium in Eisenia fetida egg capsules. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 2277–2288. ( 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02231.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hosokawa T, Kikuchi Y, Shimada M, Fukatsu T. 2008. Symbiont acquisition alters behaviour of stinkbug nymphs. Biol. Lett. 4, 45–48. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0510) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hosokawa T, Kikuchi Y, Fukatsu T. 2007. How many symbionts are provided by mothers, acquired by offspring, and needed for successful vertical transmission in an obligate insect–bacterium mutualism? Mol. Ecol. 16, 5316–5325. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03592.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bistolas KSI, Sakamoto RI, Fernandes JAM, Goffredi SK. 2014. Symbiont polyphyly, co-evolution, and necessity in pentatomid stinkbugs from Costa Rica. Front. Microbiol. 5, 349 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00349) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sison-Mangus MP, Mushegian AA, Ebert D. 2015. Water fleas require microbiota for survival, growth and reproduction. ISME J. 9, 59–67. ( 10.1038/ismej.2014.116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mushegian AA, Walser JC, Sullam KE, Ebert D. 2018. The microbiota of diapause: how host–microbe associations are formed after dormancy in an aquatic crustacean. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 400–413. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12709) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Douglas AE. 2018. Good Daphnia parents do not control the offspring microbiome. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 320–322. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12796) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trevelline BK, MacLeod KJ, Knutie SA, Langkilde T, Kohl KD. 2018. In ovo microbial communities: a potential mechanism for the initial acquisition of gut microbiota among oviparous birds and lizards. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180225 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0225) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Van Veelen HPJ, Salles JF, Tieleman BI. 2018. Microbiome assembly of avian eggshells and their potential as transgenerational carriers of maternal microbiota. ISME J. 12, 1375–1388. ( 10.1038/s41396-018-0067-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilkins LGE, Rogivue A, Schütz F, Fumagalli L, Wedekind C. 2015. Increased diversity of egg-associated bacteria on brown trout (Salmo trutta) at elevated temperatures. Scient. Rep. 5, 17084 ( 10.1038/srep17084) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilkins LGE, Fumagalli L, Wedekind C. 2016. Effects of host genetics and environment on egg-associated microbiotas in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Mol. Ecol. 25, 4930–4945. ( 10.1111/mec.13798) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Romero J, Navarrete P. 2006. 16S rDNA-based analysis of dominant bacterial populations associated with early life stages of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Microb. Ecol. 51, 422–430. ( 10.1007/s00248-006-9037-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beemelmanns A, Poirier M, Bayer T, Kuenzel S, Roth O. 2019. Microbial embryonal colonization during pipefish male pregnancy. Scient. Rep. 9, 3 ( 10.1038/s41598-018-37026-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Warkentin KM, Currie CR, Rehner SA. 2001. Egg-killing fungus induces early hatching of red-eyed treefrog eggs. Ecology 82, 2860–2869. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2860:ekfieh]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cordaux R, Bouchon D, Grève P. 2011. The impact of endosymbionts on the evolution of host sex-determination mechanisms. Trends Genet. 27, 332–341. ( 10.1016/j.tig.2011.05.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Serbus LR, Casper-Lindley C, Landmann F, Sullivan W. 2008. The genetics and cell biology of Wolbachia- host interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 683–707. ( 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130354) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. 2008. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751. ( 10.1038/nrmicro1969) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ballinger MJ, Perlman SJ. 2019. The defensive Spiroplasma. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 32, 36–41. ( 10.1016/j.cois.2018.10.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Anbutsu H, Fukatsu T. 2011. Spiroplasma as a model insect endosymbiont. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 3, 144–153. ( 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00240.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anbutsu H, Fukatsu T. 2003. Population dynamics of male-killing and non-male-killing spiroplasmas in Drosophila melanogaster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1428–1434. ( 10.1128/aem.69.3.1428-1434.2003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Le Page DP, et al. 2017. Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 543, 243–247. ( 10.1038/nature21391) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harumoto T, Lemaitre B. 2018. Male-killing toxin in a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila. Nature 557, 252–255. ( 10.1038/s41586-018-0086-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Herren JK, Paredes JC, Schüpfer F, Lemaitre B. 2013. Vertical transmission of a Drosophila endosymbiont via cooption of the yolk transport and internalization machinery. MBio. 4, e00532-12. ( 10.1128/mbio.00532-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newton ILG, Savytskyy O, Sheehan KB. 2015. Wolbachia utilize host actin for efficient maternal transmission in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004798 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004798) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Russell SL, Lemseffer N, Sullivan WT. 2018. Wolbachia and host germline components compete for kinesin-mediated transport to the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007216 ( 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007216) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wahl M. 1989. Marine epibiosis I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 58, 175–189. ( 10.3354/meps058175) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Benkendorff K, Davis AR, Bremner JB. 2001. Chemical defense in the egg masses of benthic invertebrates: an assessment of antibacterial activity in 39 mollusks and 4 polychaetes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 78, 109–118. ( 10.1006/jipa.2001.5047) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fraune S, Augustin R, Bosch TCG. 2011. Embryo protection in contemporary immunology: why bacteria matter. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 369–372. ( 10.4161/cib.15159) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kerwin AH, et al. 2019. Shielding the next generation: symbiotic bacteria from a reproductive organ protect bobtail squid eggs from fungal fouling. MBio 10, e02376-19 ( 10.1128/mBio.02376-19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gil-Turnes MS, Hay ME, Fenical W. 1989. Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus. Science 246, 116–118. ( 10.1126/science.2781297) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Flórez LV, Biedermann PHW, Engl T, Kaltenpoth M. 2015. Defensive symbioses of animals with prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Natural Prod. Rep. 32, 904–936. ( 10.1039/C5NP00010F) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Flórez LV, Kaltenpoth M. 2017. Symbiont dynamics and strain diversity in the defensive mutualism between Lagria beetles and Burkholderia. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 3674–3688. ( 10.1111/1462-2920.13868) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Flórez LV, Scherlach K, Miller IJ, Rodrigues A, Kwan JC, Hertweck C, Kaltenpoth M. 2018. An antifungal polyketide associated with horizontally acquired genes supports symbiont-mediated defense in Lagria villosa beetles. Nat. Commun. 9, 2478 ( 10.1038/s41467-018-04955-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Engl T, Kroiss J, Kai M, Nechitaylo TY, Svatoš A, Kaltenpoth M. 2018. Evolutionary stability of antibiotic protection in a defensive symbiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2020–E2029. ( 10.1073/pnas.1719797115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kroiss J, Kaltenpoth M, Schneider B, Schwinger MG, Hertweck C, Maddula RK, Strohm E, Svatoš A. 2010. Symbiotic streptomycetes provide antibiotic combination prophylaxis for wasp offspring. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 261–263. ( 10.1038/nchembio.331) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Koehler S, Doubský J, Kaltenpoth M. 2013. Dynamics of symbiont-mediated antibiotic production reveal efficient long-term protection for beewolf offspring. Front. Zool. 10, 3 ( 10.1186/1742-9994-10-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lam K, Thu K, Tsang M, Moore M, Gries G. 2009. Bacteria on housefly eggs, Musca domestica, suppress fungal growth in chicken manure through nutrient depletion or antifungal metabolites. Naturwissenschaften 96, 1127–1132. ( 10.1007/s00114-009-0574-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lam K, Geisreiter C, Gries G. 2009. Ovipositing female house flies provision offspring larvae with bacterial food. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 133, 292–295. ( 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00928.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kador M, Horn MA, Dettner K. 2011. Novel oligonucleotide probes for in situ detection of pederin-producing endosymbionts of Paederus riparius rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 319, 73–81. ( 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02270.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kellner RLL. 2002. Molecular identification of an endosymbiotic bacterium associated with pederin biosynthesis in Paederus sabaeus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, 389–395. ( 10.1016/S0965-1748(01)00115-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Piel J, Höfer I, Hui D. 2004. Evidence for a symbiosis island involved in horizontal acquisition of pederin biosynthetic capabilities by the bacterial symbiont of Paederus fuscipes beetles. J. Bacteriol. 186, 1280–1286. ( 10.1128/JB.186.5.1280-1286.2004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Senderovich Y, Halpern M. 2013. The protective role of endogenous bacterial communities in chironomid egg masses and larvae. ISME J. 7, 2147–2158. ( 10.1038/ismej.2013.100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sela R, Halpern M. 2020. Seasonal dynamics of Chironomus transvaalensis populations and the microbial community composition of their egg masses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnaa008 ( 10.1093/femsle/fnaa008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cawthorn RJ. 2011. Diseases of American lobsters (Homarus americanus): a review. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 106, 71–78. ( 10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gil-Turnes MS, Fenical W. 1992. Embryos of Homarus americanus are protected by epibiotic bacteria. Biol. Bull. 182, 105–108. ( 10.2307/1542184) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barry KJ, Wainwright NR. 1996. Surface-dwelling bacteria on the eggs of Crangon septemspinosa restrict infection by the fungus Lagenidium myophilum in vitro. Biol. Bull. 191, 317–318. ( 10.1086/BBLv191n2p317) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bloodgood RA. 1977. The squid accessory nidamental gland: ultrastructure and association with bacteria. Tissue Cell 9, 197–208. ( 10.1016/0040-8166(77)90016-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Barbieri E, Paster BJ, Hughes D, Zurek L, Moser DP, Teske A, Sogin ML. 2001. Phylogenetic characterization of epibiotic bacteria in the accessory nidamental gland and egg capsules of the squid Loligo pealei (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Environ. Microbiol. 3, 151–167. ( 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00172.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Collins AJ, LaBarre BA, Won BSW, Shah MV, Heng S, Choudhury MH, Haydar SA, Santiago J, Nyholm SV. 2012. Diversity and partitioning of bacterial populations within the accessory nidamental gland of the squid Euprymna scolopes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 4200–4208. ( 10.1128/AEM.07437-11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pichon D, Gaia V, Norman MD, Boucher-Rodoni R. 2005. Phylogenetic diversity of epibiotic bacteria in the accessory nidamental glands of squids (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae and Idiosepiidae). Mar. Biol. 147, 1323–1332. ( 10.1007/s00227-005-0014-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pierantoni U. 1918. Organi luminosi, organi simbiotici e ghiandola nidamentale accessoria nei cephalopodi [Light organs, symbiotic organs, and accessory nidamental glands in cephalopods]. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli 30, 30–36. [In Italian.] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Biggs J, Epel D. 1991. Egg capsule sheath of Loligo opalescens Berry: structure and association with bacteria. J. Exp. Zool. 259, 263–267. ( 10.1002/jez.1402590217) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Belcaid M, et al. 2019. Symbiotic organs shaped by distinct modes of genome evolution in cephalopods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 3030–3035. ( 10.1073/pnas.1817322116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nyholm SV, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2004. The winnowing: establishing the squid–vibrio symbiosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 632–642. ( 10.1038/nrmicro957) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.McFall-Ngai MJ. 2014. The importance of microbes in animal development: lessons from the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 177–194. ( 10.1146/annurev-micro-091313-103654) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Collins AJ, Fullmer MS, Gogarten JP, Nyholm SV. 2015. Comparative genomics of Roseobacter clade bacteria isolated from the accessory nidamental gland of Euprymna scolopes. Front. Microbiol. 6, 123 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00123) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kerwin AH, Nyholm SV. 2017. Symbiotic bacteria associated with a bobtail squid reproductive system are detectable in the environment, and stable in the host and developing eggs. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 1463–1475. ( 10.1111/1462-2920.13665) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kerwin AH, Nyholm SV. 2018. Reproductive system symbiotic bacteria are conserved between two distinct populations of Euprymna scolopes from Oahu, Hawaii. mSphere 3, e00531-17. ( 10.1128/mSphere.00531-17) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gromek SM, Suria AM, Fullmer MS, Garcia JL, Gogarten JP, Nyholm SV, Balunas MJ. 2016. Leisingera sp. JC1, a bacterial isolate from Hawaiian bobtail squid eggs, produces indigoidine and differentially inhibits vibrios. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1342 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01342) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Barbieri E, Barry K, Child A, Wainwrigth N. 1997. Antimicrobial activity in the microbial community of the accessory-nidamental gland and egg cases of Loligo pealei (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Biol. Bull. 193, 275–276. ( 10.1086/BBLv193n2p275) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Martín-Vivaldi M, Soler JJ, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Arco L, Martín-Platero AM, Martínez-Bueno M, Ruiz-Rodríguez M, Valdivia E. 2014. Special structures of hoopoe eggshells enhance the adhesion of symbiont-carrying uropygial secretion that increase hatching success. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 1289–1301. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12243) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Arco L, Juárez-García-Pelayo N. 2014. Hoopoes color their eggs with antimicrobial uropygial secretions. Naturwissenschaften 101, 697–705. ( 10.1007/s00114-014-1201-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fujimoto M, Crossman JA, Scribner KT, Marsh TL. 2013. Microbial community assembly and succession on lake sturgeon egg surfaces as a function of simulated spawning stream flow rate. Microb. Ecol. 66, 500–511. ( 10.1007/s00248-013-0256-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fujimoto M, Lovett B, Angoshtari R, Nirenberg P, Loch TP, Scribner KT, Marsh T.. 2018. Antagonistic interactions and biofilm forming capabilities among bacterial strains isolated from the egg surfaces of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). Microb. Ecol. 75, 22–37. ( 10.1007/s00248-017-1013-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liu Y, et al. 2014. Deciphering microbial landscapes of fish eggs to mitigate emerging diseases. ISME J. 8, 2002–2014. ( 10.1038/ismej.2014.44) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Farine JP, Habbachi W, Cortot J, Roche S, Ferveur JF. 2017. Maternally-transmitted microbiota affects odor emission and preference in Drosophila larva. Scient. Rep. 7, 6062 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-04922-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Goffredi SK, Gregory A, Jones WJ, Morella NM, Sakamoto RI. 2014. Ontogenetic variation in epibiont community structure in the deep-sea yeti crab, Kiwa puravida: convergence among crustaceans. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1457–1472. ( 10.1111/mec.12439) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Guri M, Durand L, Cueff-Gauchard V, Zbinden M, Crassous P, Shillito B, Cambon-Bonavita M-A. 2012. Acquisition of epibiotic bacteria along the life cycle of the hydrothermal shrimp Rimicaris exoculata. ISME J. 6, 597–609. ( 10.1038/ismej.2011.133) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Methou P, Hernández-Ávila I, Aube J, Cueff-Gauchard V, Gayet N, Amand L, Shillito B, Pradillon F, Cambon-Bonavita M-A. 2019. Is it first the egg or the shrimp? Diversity and variation in microbial communities colonizing broods of the vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata during embryonic development. Front. Microbiol. 10, 808 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00808) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Pinder AW, Friet SC. 1994. Oxygen transport in egg masses of the amphibians Rana sylvatica and Ambystoma maculatum: convection, diffusion and oxygen production by algae. J. Exp. Biol. 197, 17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Graham ER, Fay SA, Davey A, Sanders RW. 2013. Intracapsular algae provide fixed carbon to developing embryos of the salamander Ambystoma maculatum. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 352–359. ( 10.1242/jeb.076711) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Graham ER, McKie-Krisberg ZM, Sanders RW. 2014. Photosynthetic carbon from algal symbionts peaks during the latter stages of embryonic development in the salamander Ambystoma maculatum. BMC Res. Notes. 7, 764 ( 10.1186/1756-0500-7-764) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tattersall GJ, Spiegelaar N. 2008. Embryonic motility and hatching success of Ambystoma maculatum are influenced by a symbiotic alga. Can. J. Zool. 86, 1289–1298. ( 10.1139/z08-115) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Small DP, Bennett RS, Bishop CD. 2014. The roles of oxygen and ammonia in the symbiotic relationship between the spotted salamander Ambystoma maculatum and the green alga Oophila amblystomatis during embryonic development. Symbiosis 64, 1–10. ( 10.1007/s13199-014-0297-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kerney R, Kim E, Hangarter RP, Heiss AA, Bishop CD, Hall BK. 2011. Intracellular invasion of green algae in a salamander host. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6497–6502. ( 10.1073/pnas.1018259108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Burns JA, Zhang H, Hill E, Kim E, Kerney R. 2017. Transcriptome analysis illuminates the nature of the intracellular interaction in a vertebrate-algal symbiosis. eLife 6, e22054 ( 10.7554/eLife.22054) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ball SG, Cenci U. 2017. Gasping for air: transcriptomics is shedding new light on the relationship between photosynthetic algae and salamander eggs. eLife 6, e27004 ( 10.7554/eLife.27004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Chen H, Ronau JA, Beckmann JF, Hochstrasser M. 2019. A Wolbachia nuclease and its binding partner provide a distinct mechanism for cytoplasmic incompatibility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22 314–22 321. ( 10.1073/pnas.1914571116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Nyholm SV, Graf J. 2012. Knowing your friends: invertebrate innate immunity fosters beneficial bacterial symbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 815–827. ( 10.1038/nrmicro2894) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Koropatnick TA, Engle JT, Apicella MA, Stabb EV, Goldman WE, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2004. Microbial factor-mediated development in a host-bacterial mutualism. Science 306, 1186–1188. ( 10.1126/science.1102218) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Foster JS, Apicella MA, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2000. Vibrio fischeri lipopolysaccharide induces developmental apoptosis, but not complete morphogenesis, of the Euprymna scolopes symbiotic light organ. Dev. Biol. 226, 242–254. ( 10.1006/dbio.2000.9868) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F. 2016. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Arora N, Sadovsky Y, Dermody TS, Coyne CB. 2017. Microbial vertical transmission during human pregnancy. Cell Host Microbe 21, 561–567. ( 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Masson-Boivin C, Giraud E, Perret X, Batut J. 2009. Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes? Trends Microbiol. 17, 458–466. ( 10.1016/j.tim.2009.07.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Moran NA, Baumann P. 2000. Bacterial endosymbionts in animals. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 270–275. ( 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00088-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Koga R, Meng XY, Tsuchida T, Fukatsu T. 2012. Cellular mechanism for selective vertical transmission of an obligate insect symbiont at the bacteriocyte–embryo interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1230–E1237. ( 10.1073/pnas.1119212109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Luan J, Sun X, Fei Z, Douglas AE. 2018. Maternal inheritance of a single somatic animal cell displayed by the bacteriocyte in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Curr. Biol. 28, 459–465.e3. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Luan JB, Shan HW, Isermann P, Huang JH, Lammerding J, Liu SS, Douglas AE. 2016. Cellular and molecular remodelling of a host cell for vertical transmission of bacterial symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160580 ( 10.1098/rspb.2016.0580) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This article has no additional data.

