Abstract
Background
Exposure to tobacco and alcohol content in audio-visual media is a risk factor for smoking and alcohol use in young people. We report an analysis of tobacco and alcohol content, and estimates of population exposure to this content, in a sample of reality television programmes broadcast in the UK.
Methods
We used 1-minute interval coding to quantify tobacco and alcohol content in all episodes of five reality TV programmes aired between January and August 2018 (Celebrity Big Brother; Made in Chelsea; The Only Way is Essex; Geordie Shore and Love Island), and estimated population exposure using viewing data and UK population estimates.
Results
We coded 5219 intervals from 112 episodes. Tobacco content appeared in 110 (2%) intervals in 20 (18%) episodes, and alcohol in 2212 (42%) intervals and in all episodes. The programmes delivered approximately 214 million tobacco gross impressions to the UK population, including 47.37 million to children; and for alcohol, 4.9 billion and 580 million respectively.
Conclusion
Tobacco, and especially alcohol, content is common in reality TV. The popularity of these programmes with young people, and consequent exposure to tobacco and alcohol imagery, represents a potentially major driver of smoking and alcohol consumption.
Keywords: alcohol, epidemiology, smoking
Background
In the year to March 2017 in England, smoking and alcohol consumption respectively caused an estimated 484 and 337 thousand hospital admissions,1,2 at a cost of £6 billion to the National Health Service and a substantially greater cost to wider society.3–5 Since almost all adults who smoke begin smoking during teenage years,6 and alcohol consumption in adolescence is associated with a higher risk of consumption in adulthood7 it is important to prevent children and adolescents from experimenting with these behaviours. The latest data shows that 38% and 22% of 11–15 year olds in England have had an alcoholic drink and tried smoking respectively.8
There is now strong evidence that exposure to advertising or other tobacco or alcohol audio visual content (AVC) in the media, including television programmes, increases tobacco and alcohol use in adolescents.9–17 Television programme content is widely seen, since an estimated 28 million British homes have at least one television18 and in 2017 the average person watched nearly three and a half hours of television each day.19 The Office of Communications (Ofcom) Broadcasting Code20 protects under-18s by restricting depictions of tobacco or alcohol use in programmes made for children, and discouraging the glamorization of tobacco or alcohol use in programmes broadcast before the 9 p.m. watershed21 or otherwise likely to be widely seen, heard or accessed by children.
However, despite these regulatory controls,20 tobacco and alcohol imagery remains prevalent in prime-time television programmes.22–25 We have previously demonstrated that reality television shows, although usually broadcast after the 9 p.m. watershed but easily accessible to children through online ‘catch-up’ services, sometimes contain high levels of tobacco and alcohol imagery,22,26,27 often more prevalent than programmes broadcast within UK prime-time television viewing times. The amount of content in reality TV programmes is likely to be seen by a large amount of young people, for example, our analysis of the 2017 series of the reality TV programme ‘Love Island’ estimated that the series delivered an 559 million gross tobacco impressions to its predominantly young adult audience, including over 47 million impressions to children aged under 16.26 Viewing figures for reality TV programmes have increased substantially in recent years,28 especially among pre-teen and teenaged viewers29–33 and it is possible that this genre of programme is exposing young audiences to tobacco and alcohol content. While, a content analysis of a single show, such as ‘Love Island’ is useful for changing policy,26,34 viewers may watch multiple reality TV shows throughout the year and different reality TV shows might appeal to different viewer demographics.35,36
This study therefore quantifies tobacco and alcohol AVC in a wider sample of reality TV programmes broadcast on UK television in early 2018, compares these findings with previous analyses of prime-time UK terrestrial television content,24,25 and estimates the population exposure that this AVC generates.
Methods
We defined reality TV programmes as those chronicling people in their daily lives or in fabricated scenarios representing everyday life, and chose five programme series broadcast on a variety of UK television channels aired on UK television between 1 January 2018 and 1 August 2018. Whilst we do not know the target population of viewers for these programmes, the selected programmes are known from previous research or from news reports to be likely to attract younger viewers.26,27,35,37,38 Celebrity Big Brother involved celebrities living together isolated from the outside world for a period of time. Made in Chelsea is a structured reality TV programme (parts of the show are scripted or made for television) which follows the lives of affluent young people living in London. The Only Way is Essex is a structured reality TV programme which follows the lives of people living in Essex. Geordie Shore follows housemates’ daily lives as they live together for a number of weeks. Love Island is a dating reality TV programme in which young contestants compete for a £50 000 prize by living in a Spanish villa.
We measured tobacco and alcohol content using one-minute interval coding, a semi-quantitative method used extensively in previous studies,39–41 and coding each interval for the presence of alcohol and tobacco content in the following categories, as previously described:23,26,41,42
Actual use
Use of tobacco or alcohol onscreen by any character, such as seeing a person smoke a cigarette or drink from a pint glass of beer.
Implied use
Any inferred tobacco or alcohol use without any actual use on screen, such as a verbal reference that a person is going to smoke or drink, or a behavioural reference such as removing a cigarette from a packet or holding an alcoholic drink.
Tobacco paraphernalia/other alcohol reference
The presence onscreen of tobacco or alcohol or related materials, such as a lighter or a beer pump/bottle.
Brand appearance
The presence of clear and unambiguous tobacco or alcohol branding, such as seeing a brand on a cigarette packet/beer bottle.
Tobacco and alcohol content were recorded as present in the one-minute interval if there was one appearance of any category in that interval. More than one category could be coded in a single interval, for example both alcohol and tobacco use. Multiple instances of the same category in the same interval were recorded as one event, but if the same event overlapped two intervals, this was coded as two separate events. One-third of the recorded footage was coded separately by two authors to ensure accuracy and reliability in the coding method. Coding was completed using Microsoft Excel and, on completion, data were entered into IBM SPSS Statistics 24 for analysis. We compared content with findings of our earlier studies of tobacco and alcohol content in prime-time UK television broadcast in 2015 using chi-square analysis.
We estimated UK audience exposure using viewing data from Digital.I43 and used UK mid-year population estimates for 201744 combined with numbers of tobacco and alcohol appearances to estimate gross and per capita impressions by age group, using previously reported methods.26,45,46 The method involves combining viewership (obtained from viewing figures) with the number of tobacco and alcohol appearances per episode to provide gross impressions, the estimated number of tobacco/alcohol exposures delivered. Dividing gross impressions by population mid-year estimates provided per capita impressions, the estimated number of tobacco/alcohol impressions delivered to each person. Both gross and per capita impressions were computed by age group. Analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics (V.24) and Microsoft Excel (2013). The confidence level was set to 95%.
Results
The 112 reality TV episodes included a total of 5219 one-minute coding intervals, ranging in number by programme from 450 (The Only Way is Essex) to 2350 (Love Island). For a breakdown of the tobacco/alcohol content seen in each programme, see Supplementary file 1.
Tobacco
Tobacco content occurred in 110 intervals (2% of all intervals) across 20 episodes (18% of all episodes), most commonly in the category of inferred tobacco use. Almost all tobacco content (98%) occurred in a single reality TV series, Celebrity Big Brother, which included cigarette smoking (actual use) in 55% of episodes, inferred tobacco use (typically people holding, but not seen smoking, a cigarette) in 62%, and tobacco paraphernalia (predominantly cigarette packs) in 45% of episodes (Table 1). Tobacco branding was not seen (Table 2).
Table 1.
Broadcast details about the reality TV programmes included in the content analysis
| Programme | Season | Number of episodes | Transmission dates | Age ratinga | Channel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celebrity Big Brother | 22 | 29 | 02/01/2018–02/02/2018 | 18 | 5 |
| Made in Chelsea | 15 | 12 | 12/03/2018–28/05/2018 | 15 | E4 |
| The Only Way is Essex | 22 | 10 | 25/03/2018–27/05/2018 | 12 | ITV2 |
| Geordie Shore | 17 | 12 | 15/05/2018–31/07/2018 | 15 | MTV |
| Love Island | 4 | 49 | 04/06/2018–30/07/2018 | No Age Ratingb | ITV2 |
aAccording to the British Board of Film Classification.
bHas been previously shown to be popular with young people.26
Table 2.
The number of intervals and episodes containing tobacco and alcohol AVC by reality TV programme
| Celebrity Big Brother | Made in Chelsea | The Only Way is Essex | Geordie Shore | Love Island | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of intervals (percentage of total intervals) (n = 1327 | Number of episodes (percentage of total episodes) (n = 29) | Number of intervals (percentage of total intervals) (n = 564) | Number of episodes (percentage of total episodes) (n = 12) | Number of intervals (percentage of total intervals) (n = 450) | Number of episodes (percentage of total episodes) (n = 10) | Number of intervals (percentage of total intervals) (n = 528) | Number of episodes (percentage of total episodes) (n = 12) | Number of intervals (percentage of total intervals) (n = 2350) | Number of episodes (percentage of total episodes) (n = 49) | |
| Tobacco | ||||||||||
| Any tobacco content | 110 (8%) | 20 (69%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (<1%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Actual tobacco use | 44 (3%) | 16 (55%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Implied tobacco use | 69 (5%) | 18 (62%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tobacco paraphernalia | 48 (4%) | 13 (45%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (<1%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tobacco branding | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Alcohol | ||||||||||
| Any Alcohol content | 365 (28%) | 29 (100%) | 355 (63%) | 12 (100%) | 158 (35%) | 6 (60%) | 300 (57%) | 12 (100%) | 927 (39%) | 49 (100%) |
| Actual alcohol use | 55 (4%) | 21 (72%) | 283 (50%) | 12 (100%) | 133 (30%) | 6 (60%) | 78 (15%) | 12 (100%) | 293 (12%) | 47 (96%) |
| Implied alcohol use | 318 (24%) | 29 (100%) | 158 (28%) | 12 (100%) | 61 (14%) | 6 (60%) | 291 (55%) | 12 (100%) | 906 (39%) | 49 (100%) |
| Other alcohol reference | 166 (13%) | 26 (90%) | 149 (26%) | 12 (100%) | 60 (13%) | 6 (60%) | 136 (26%) | 12 (100%) | 107 (5%) | 25 (51%) |
| Alcohol branding | 1 (<1%) | 1 (3%) | 7 (1%) | 3 (25%) | 13 (3%) | 5 (50%) | 51 (10%) | 12 (100%) | 1 (<1%) | 1 (2%) |
Tobacco impressions
We estimate that the 112 episodes of reality TV delivered 214 million tobacco gross impressions (95% CI 193.74–235.84) to the UK population, including 47.37 million (95% CI 37.63–57.13) to children aged <16. Tobacco impressions per capita were highest (average 5.04 (95%CI 4.63–5.47)) in the 55-64 age group. Children received on average 0.80 (95% CI 0.64–0.97) per capita impressions, and women received on average more per capita impressions than men (4.92 (95% CI 4.51–5.33) and 2.35 (95%CI 2.06–2.63) respectively). For a breakdown of total gross and per capita impressions per episode see Table S2.
Alcohol
Alcohol content appeared in all 112 episodes and in 2212 (42%) one-minute intervals, ranging from 28% of intervals in Celebrity Big Brother to 63% of those in Made in Chelsea (Table 2). The greatest number of intervals including any alcohol content occurred in Love Island (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Percentage of one-minute intervals containing alcohol content by programme and coding category.
Actual alcohol use appeared in 925 intervals (18%) across 102 episodes (91%), most commonly involving consumption of wine or champagne (454 intervals, 49% of actual use intervals). Inferred alcohol use was seen in 1767 intervals (34%) across all 112 episodes, most commonly in the form of characters holding alcoholic drinks (1561 intervals, 88%). Alcohol paraphernalia appeared in 653 intervals (13%) across 85 episodes (76%), and typically involved bottles containing alcoholic drinks shown on screen (554 intervals, 85%) (Table 1).
Alcohol branding occurred in 74 intervals (1%) in 23 episodes (21%) across all five programme series, and was most prevalent in Geordie Shore (51 intervals, 69% of episodes). Forty different brands were identified, the most common being Smirnoff vodka (in 23 intervals), all but one of which occurred in Geordie Shore. The second and third most prevalent brands were Jagermeister and Corona, which occurred exclusively in Geordie Shore (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Prevalence of the 10 most commonly observed brands by reality TV programme.
Alcohol impressions
We estimate that the 112 episodes of reality TV delivered 4.9 billion alcohol gross impressions (95% CI 4.5–5.3) to the UK population, including 580 million (95% CI 469–690) to children aged <16. Alcohol impressions per capita were highest (average 166.99 (95%CI 157.57–176.41)) in the 16-34 age group. Children received on average 28.19 (95% CI 24.26–158.83) per capita impressions, and women received on average more per capita impressions than men (73.45 (95% CI 66.75–80.15) and (54.35 (95%CI 48.75–59.93) respectively). There were 47 million (95% CI 39.57–283.26) gross impressions of branded alcohol products including 15 million (11.03–19.56) to children. For a breakdown of total gross and per capita impressions per episode see Table S3.
Comparison with UK terrestrial television content
Comparison with our earlier content analyses of UK prime-time broadcast television24,25 demonstrated similar proportions of programmes including any tobacco content, but significantly higher proportions including actual or implied tobacco use, and all categories of alcohol content (Table 3).
Table 3.
Proportion (%) of broadcasts containing tobacco or alcohol in reality TV and prime-time UK broadcast television
| Reality TV (%) | Prime-time television23,24 (%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco | |||
| Any tobacco content | 18 | 17 | 0.76 |
| Actual tobacco use | 14 | 5 | <0.01 |
| Implied tobacco use | 16 | 7 | <0.01 |
| Tobacco paraphernalia | 13 | 12 | 0.61 |
| Tobacco branding | 0 | 0.6 | 0.42 |
| Alcohol | |||
| Any alcohol content | 100 | 54 | <0.01 |
| Actual alcohol use | 86 | 11 | <0.01 |
| Implied alcohol use | 95 | 38 | <0.01 |
| Other alcohol reference | 72 | 40 | <0.01 |
| Alcohol branding | 20 | 13 | 0.04 |
Discussion
Main findings of this study
This study demonstrates that in UK reality TV broadcast in early 2018, tobacco imagery was common in one series (Celebrity Big Brother) but occurred rarely or not at all in the other four series analysed. In contrast, alcohol imagery occurred in all 112 episodes we examined. Branding, particularly of three brands (Smirnoff, Jagermeister and Corona) occurred most commonly in Geordie Shore. Comparison with content analysis of prime-time UK television from 2015 demonstrates similar overall levels of tobacco content, but much higher alcohol content. The tobacco and alcohol content in these programmes generates substantial population exposure, of the order of millions of impressions for tobacco, and billions for alcohol. These included millions of tobacco impressions in children aged under 16, and nearly half a billion alcohol impressions.
Our study thus provides evidence that although ostensibly aimed at adult audiences, reality TV programmes in the UK are a significant source of exposure of children to both tobacco and alcohol, but particularly alcohol, imagery. Although our analysis is limited to reality TV programmes produced and broadcast in the UK, the formats of many of these programmes are replicated internationally, making it likely that our findings apply more widely than the UK alone. The five programme series were selected to represent a variety of reality TV programmes, broadcast on a range of free and paid for channels, and all were broadcast after the 9 p.m. watershed.21 However these programmes are also likely to appeal to and be watched by children either at the time of broadcast47 or at any time of the day on catch up services such as the ITV hub.48
Since previous research evaluating the effect of tobacco and alcohol AVC in the media on initiation of tobacco and alcohol use demonstrates an exposure-response relation with exposure to media imagery,49–51 our findings indicate that reality TV programmes are a potentially important source of exposure to tobacco and alcohol AVC for children and young adults. We have previously reported high levels of tobacco imagery, including branding, in the 2017 series of ‘Love Island’.26 That study was initiated in response to newspaper reports of complaints over the level of smoking in the show and demonstrated that whilst the programme makers defended the tobacco content on the grounds of editorial justification the amount of tobacco imagery in the show fell significantly immediately after the public criticism, thus questioning the initial justification. That our present analysis demonstrates that the 2018 series of the show contained no smoking at all, attributed in a newspaper report to an editorial decision,52 while achieving greater audience viewing53 suggests that the initial justification for smoking content was indeed spurious. Whilst a content analysis of a single show such as ‘Love Island’ is useful for changing policy about tobacco and/or alcohol content shown on TV,26,34 viewers may watch multiple reality TV shows throughout the year and different reality TV shows might appeal to different viewer demographics,35,36 therefore being exposed to tobacco and alcohol AVC from multiple sources. It is therefore important to keep track of tobacco and alcohol content in programming, and particularly the range of reality TV at aimed at youth audiences35,36 so that breaches of policy and/or UK or EU law can be highlighted to regulators.
We have also previously reported high levels of alcohol imagery, and particularly of Smirnoff branding, in Geordie Shore.27 The present study repeats that finding. Whilst a connection has been suggested between MTV and the Smirnoff Brand27 it remains unclear whether this branding occurs as a result of any sponsorship or other financial arrangement between the company making Smirnoff (Diageo) and the programme makers responsible for Geordie Shore. Brands can receive widespread exposure by featuring in television programmes; and whilst the Ofcom Broadcasting Code prevents paid for product placement in the UK,54 brands can appear in programmes if they are considered ‘editorially justified’54 and were acquired at ‘no significant value’ and no provider has been paid for this (57 p. 52). Alcohol promoters may now therefore be using reality TV programmes to circumvent the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. Love Island formed a financial partnership with Echo Falls wine which resulted in advertising exposure during the advertisement periods of the programme, and the Love Island logo appearing on bottles of Echo Falls. Whilst no Echo Falls branding was apparent in the programme, glasses of wine were observed more regularly than any other type of alcohol in the programme.
Viewing figures for reality TV programmes have increased substantially in recent years,28 especially among pre-teen and teenaged viewers.29–33 Although section 1.10 of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code states that tobacco and alcohol content ‘must not be condoned, encouraged or glamorized in other programmes likely to be widely seen, heard or accessed by under-eighteens unless there is editorial justification’,20 our study suggests that this guidance is not being observed in practice. Further measures may therefore be required to protect under-18s from tobacco and alcohol content in reality TV programmes.
What is already known on this topic
Initiation of smoking and alcohol use at a young age is a strong risk factor for dependence and continued use in later life. There is strong evidence that exposure to advertising or other tobacco and alcohol imagery in the media increases subsequent use in adolescents. Previous studies have found that alcohol and tobacco content is frequently shown on UK television and that reality TV contains high levels of tobacco and alcohol content (26, 27 2018, Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’)
What this study adds
Tobacco and alcohol content shown on TV has an effect on the uptake of smoking and alcohol use in young people. Our analysis shows that reality television programmes are a major source of exposure to young people in the UK and is likely to be a contributor to smoking and alcohol uptake by young people. The Ofcom broadcasting code protects under-18s from tobacco and alcohol content by restricting depictions of tobacco or alcohol use in programmes made for children, and discouraging the glamorization of tobacco or alcohol use in programmes broadcast before the 9 p.m. watershed21 or otherwise likely to be widely seen, heard or accessed by children. The current study shows that reality TV programmes, while usually broadcast after the 9 pm watershed, are widely seen and accessed by young people and that this genre of programme is exposing young people to tobacco and alcohol content. Quantifying AVC content can be used to impact policy and change depictions in the media. Tighter scheduling rules from Ofcom, such as restricting the amount of content and branding shown in these programmes, could prevent children and adolescents being exposed to the tobacco and alcohol content found in reality TV programmes.
Limitations of this study
We coded reality TV programmes which aired during early 2018, this timeframe was chosen to allow the study to be completed in a timely manner, however we acknowledge that reality TV programmes are shown throughout the year. The number of programmes included in the current analysis were chosen for practical reasons, however other reality TV programmes were shown on UK television during this time period. The current study only explored tobacco and alcohol content shown in programmes broadcast on UK television, this did not include content on video-on-demand services. The viewing figures used to estimate exposure to tobacco and alcohol content group viewers into age groups. Whilst we can estimate exposure to this content in under-16’s we do not have information on the number of children at each age who were exposed to this content.
This study has shown that reality TV programmes in the UK are a significant source of exposure of children to both tobacco and alcohol, but particularly alcohol, imagery. Future studies should explore a larger sample of reality TV programmes for a longer period of time and at different points in the year in order to gain a more representative picture of tobacco and alcohol exposure in reality TV programming.
Supplementary Material
Declaration of interests
None to declare.
Funding
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/K023195/1] and the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, with core funding from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council and the Department of Health under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. NHS Statistics on Smoking - England 2018, 2018. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-smoking/statistics-on-smoking-england-2018/part-1-smoking-related-ill-health-and-mortality.
- 2. NHS Statistics on Alcohol - England 2018, 2018. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-alcohol/2018/part-1.
- 3. Public Health England Alcohol Treatment in England 2013-14. 2014.
- 4. Allender S, Balakrishnan R, Scarborough P et al. The burden of smoking- related ill health in the UK. Tob Control 2009;18(4):262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Callum C, Boyle S, Sandford A. Estimating the cost of smoking to the NHS in England and the impact of declining prevalence. HEPL 2011;6(4):489–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Public Health England Smoking and tobacco: applying all our health 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smoking-and-tobacco-applying-all-our-health/smoking-and-tobacco-applying-all-our-health.
- 7. Bonomo YA, Bowes G, Coffey C et al. Teenage drinking and the onset of alcohol dependence: a cohort study over 7 years. Addiction 2004;99(1):1520–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. HSCIC Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people in England – 2014, 2015.
- 9. US Department of Health and National Services Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Anderson P, De Brujin A, Angus K et al. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol 2009;44(3):229–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Smith L, Foxcroft DR. The effects of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinkin behaviour in young people: systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMC Public Health 2009;9(51):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hanewinkel R, Sargent JD, Hunt K et al. Portrayal of alcohol consumption in movies and drinking initiation in low-risk adolescents. Pediatrics 2014;133:973–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chang F, Miao N, Lee C et al. The association of media exposure and media literacy with adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. J Health Psychol 2016;21(4):513–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Leonardi-Bee J, Nderi M, Britton J. Smoking in movies and smoking initiation in adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2016;111(10):1750–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 17. National Cancer Institute The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 2008.
- 18. Broadcasters’ Audience Research Board Television ownership in private domestic households 1956-2017 2017. http://www.barb.co.uk/resources/tv-ownership/.
- 19. Ofcom Scotland leads the UK for time spent watching TV 2018. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/media-releases/2018/scotland-time-watching-tv#1.
- 20. Ofcom The Ofcom Broadcasting Code (with the Cross-promotion Code and the On Demand Programme Service Rules) 2017. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code.
- 21. Ofcom What is the Watershed? 2013. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/advice-for-consumers/television/what-is-the-watershed.
- 22. Lyons A, McNeill A, Britton J. Tobacco Imagery on prime time UK television. Tob Control 2014;23:257–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lyons A, McNeill A, Britton J. Alcohol Imagery on popularly viewed television in the UK. J Public Health 2013;36(3):426–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Barker AB, Whittamore KH, Britton J et al. Content analysis of tobacco content in UK television. Tob Control 2018. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Barker AB, Whittamore KH, Britton J et al. A content analysis of alcohol content in UK television. J Public Health 2018: fdy142. 10.1093/pubmed/fdy142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Barker AB, Opazo Breton M, Cranwell J et al. Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’. Tob Control 2018;27:709–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lowe E, Britton J, Cranwell J. Alcohol content in the ‘hyper-reality’ MTV show ‘Geordie Shore’. Alcohol Alcohol 2018;53(3):337–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. TV Licensing Telescope Report. 2011.
- 29. Kaiser Family Foundation The Reality of Health: Reality Television and the Public Health. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Patino A, Kaltcheva VD, Smith MF. The appeal of reality television for teen and pre-teen audiences: the power of ‘connectedness’ and psycho-demographics. J Advertising Res 2011;51(1):288–97. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nielson Nielson 2006 Report on Television. New York: Nielson Media Research, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nielson Nielson 2007 Report on Television. New York: Nielson, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nielson Nielson 2008 Report on Television. New York: Nielson, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Daily Mail Love Island bosses ‘ban cigarettes in the villa and garden for 2018 series after a wave of complaints last year’ 2018. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5759419/Love-Island-bosses-ban-cigarettes-villa-garden-2018-series.html.
- 35. Yougov Social Media & TV audiences 2012. https://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/07/26/social-media-tv-audiences/.
- 36. BBC News Big Brother: Who is still watching it? 2017. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40171096.
- 37. ITV Programmes—The Only Way is Essex 2018. https://www.itvmedia.co.uk/programmes/programme-planner/the-only-way-is-essex-rpt.
- 38. Huffington Post How Celebrity Big Brother proved that younger viewers aren’t the dimwits they’re perceived to be 2014. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/christian-guiltenane/celebrity-big-brother_b_5826948.html.
- 39. Cranwell J, Murray R, Lewis S et al. Adolescents’ exposure to tobacco and alcohol content in YouTube music videos. Addiction 2015;110(4):703–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lyons A. Tobacco and alcohol in films and on television/Ailsa Lyons. PhD Thesis. University of Nottingham, 2012.
- 41. Lyons A, McNeill A, Britton J. Tobacco imagery on prime time UK television. Tob Control 2014;23(3):257–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Barker AB, Britton J, Grant-Braham B et al. Alcohol audio-visual content in formula 1 television broadcasting. BMC Public Health 2018;18:1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Digital I Digital.I: a fresh perspective on TV viewing figures, 2018. http://www.digital-i.com.
- 44. Office for National Statistics Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: Mid 2017 2018. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2017.
- 45. Cranwell J, Opazo-Breton M, Britton J. Adult and adolescent exposure to tobacco and alcohol content in contemporary YouTube music videos in Great Britain: a population estimate. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70(5):488–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sargent JD, Tanski SE, Gibson J. Exposure to movie smoking among US adolescents aged 10 to 14 years: a population estimate. Pediatrics 2007;119(5):e1167–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. TV Licensing Telescope 2014 2014. http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006402279&ssbinary=true.
- 48. ITV ITV Hub 2018. https://www.itv.com/hub/itv.
- 49. Morgenstern M, Sargent JD, Engels RCME et al. Smoking in movies and adolescent smoking initiation: longitudinal study in six European countries. Am J Prev Med 2013;44(4):339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mejia R, Pérez A, Abad‐Vivero EN et al. Exposure to alcohol use in motion pictures and teen drinking in Latin America. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2016;40(3):631–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sargent JD, Wills TA, Stoolmiller M et al. Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking. J Stud Alcohol 2006;67(1):54–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Daily Mail Love Island bosses ‘ban cigarettes in the villa and garden for 2018 series after a wave of complaints last year’ 2018. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5759419/Love-Island-bosses-ban-cigarettes-villa-garden-2018-series.html.
- 53. DiCgital spy Love island 2018 final pulls in biggest ITV2 viewing figures of all time 2018. http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/love-island/news/a862823/love-island-2018-final-ratings-viewing-figures-series-4-itv2/.
- 54. Ofcom Broadcasting Code Guidance Notes: Section 9: Commercial References in Television Programming. London: Ofcom, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


