Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Sep 1;28(Suppl 1):975–976. doi: 10.1111/odi.13593

Risk perception and readiness of dental students to treat patients amid COVID‐19: Implication for dental education

Ruwaa Alawia 1, Abanoub Riad 2, Elham Kateeb 1,
PMCID: PMC7436224  PMID: 32767714

1.

Dental settings have one of the highest risks of infection transmission (Jamal et al., 2020; Mohebati, Davis, & Fry, 2010). Therefore, the COVID‐19 pandemic has presented significant challenge for dental students and infection control measures. Data presented here were extracted from a survey conducted among Palestinian dental students in their clinical study years to evaluate their readiness to return to dental care provision during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

A total of 305 dental students from Al‐Quds University (AQU) and Arab American University (AAU) completed the questionnaire in mid‐May 2020. Thirty‐four percent of the current sample (n = 103) perceived COVID‐19 as very dangerous, and 84.3% (n = 257) believed that COVID‐19 is a serious public health issue. Fifty‐five percent (n = 168) did not consider themselves prepared for this outbreak, and 66.2% (n = 202) did not think that their outpatient clinics' infection control measures prior to COVID‐19 are adequate to receive patients during this pandemic. Eighty‐eight percent of the students (n = 269) admitted to fear of transmitting the virus to family and friends. This fear was mainly related to their perception that standard precautions used in dental settings are inadequate and make it unsafe to deal with patients during the current pandemic (χ2 = 50.45, p < .001). Thus, 82% of students (n = 250) preferred to avoid working with COVID‐19 suspected patients. This perception of unsafety related to the priortoCOVID‐19 infection measures also impacted the level of confidence these students had in dealing with COVID‐19 patients (χ2 = 25.8, p = .01). Only 26% (n = 80) of the students had “considerabletogreat” level of confidence in handling suspected COVID‐19 patients (Table 1).

Table 1.

Students' risk perception and readiness to treat patients amid the COVID‐19 pandemic

Question Categories N %
How do you perceive COVID‐19? Very dangerous 103 33.8
Moderately dangerous 190 62.3
Not dangerous 12 3.9
In case a patient was sneezing or coughing in your clinic, what would you do? Refuse treating the patient and ask him/her to leave the clinic 15 4.9
Treat the patient and ask him/her to go to the hospital 113 37.0
Refer the patient to the hospital without treating him/her 177 58.0
To what extent do you have confidence in handling suspected COVID‐19 patients? Not at all 70 23.0
To a little extent 60 19.7
To some extent 95 31.1
To a considerable extent 56 18.4
To a great extent 24 7.9
I fear I will transmit COVID‐19 to my family members Strongly agree 191 62.6
Agree 78 25.6
Disagree 23 7.5
Strongly disagree 13 4.3
I feel overwhelmed with new COVID‐19 regulations Strongly agree 49 16.1
Agree 192 63.0
Disagree 56 18.4
Strongly disagree 8 2.6
I don't feel safe at work when I use the standard precautions Strongly agree 54 17.7
Agree 139 45.6
Disagree 102 33.4
Strongly disagree 10 3.3

It is obvious from current data that students' confidence in handling COVID‐19 patients and the fear of transmitting infection to family and friends were related to their perception of the inadequacy of standard infection control protocols used prior to COVID‐19. Therefore, dental schools need to invest in the new infection control measures placed by national authorities, and adopted by universities as their new norm. As an example, AQU followed a very strict protocol in reopening their student dental clinics and ensured all advanced PPE needed to implement these protocols. This should be accompanied by periodic updating of students' knowledge about infectious diseases and control measures.

Another important point that needs to be addressed by dental schools following the COVID‐19 pandemic is how to change current teaching philosophy to make it more resilient for future pandemics and crises. First, dental schools need to teach their students not to depend solely on the current restorative model and to learn alternative evidence‐based treatment options that focus on prevention, minimal intervention, and less aerosol generation. Examples are atraumatic restorative treatment, Hall technique, and the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in disease stabilization (de Amorim et al., 2018; Khan, Badar, Tab assum, & Ghafoor, 2019; Slayton et al., 2018).

Second, students in this sample believed that they have an important role in educating patients about COVID‐19; this sense of responsibility needs to be maximized in emphasizing the importance of dentists' role in pandemics in providing care and supporting other frontline healthcare providers when needed. Dental students need to view themselves not only as excellent dentists but also as practicing healthcare professionals providing oral health within the context of systemic health and infection prevention.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Ruwaa Alawia: Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing–original draft. Abanoub Riad: Formal analysis; Writing–review & editing. Elham Kateeb: Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Validation; Writing–review & editing.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/odi.13593.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank each anonymously participating dental student of Al‐Quds University (Palestine) and Arab American University (Palestine) who contributed to making this work possible.

REFERENCES

  1. de Amorim, R. G. , Frencken, J. E. , Raggio, D. P. , Chen, X. , Hu, X. , & Leal, S. C. (2018). Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 22(8), 2703–2725. 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jamal, M. , Shah, M. , Almarzooqi, S. H. , Aber, H. , Khawaja, S. , El Abed, R. , … Samaranayake, L. P. (2020). Overview of transnational recommendations for COVID‐19 transmission control in dental care settings. Oral Diseases. 10.1111/odi.13431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Khan, F. R. , Badar, S. B. , Tabassum, S. , & Ghafoor, R. (2019). Effectiveness of hall technique for primary carious molars: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 12(5), 445–452. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohebati, A. , Davis, J. M. , & Fry, D. E. (2010). Current risks of occupational blood‐borne viral infection. Surgical Infections, 11(3), 325–331. 10.1089/sur.2010.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Slayton, R. L. , Urquhart, O. , Araujo, M. W. B. , Fontana, M. , Guzmán‐Armstrong, S. , Nascimento, M. M. , … Carrasco‐Labra, A. (2018). Evidence‐based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: A report from the American Dental Association. Journal of the American Dental Association, 149(10), 837–849.e19. 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Oral Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES