Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Sep 4;63(11):1144–1148. doi: 10.1111/myc.13155

Isolation of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples of patients with COVID‐19 in a Spanish Tertiary Care Hospital

Iker Falces‐Romero 1,, Mario Ruiz‐Bastián 1, Beatriz Díaz‐Pollán 2, Emilio Maseda 3, Julio García‐Rodríguez 1; SARS‐CoV‐2 Working Group
PMCID: PMC7436624  PMID: 32749040

Summary

Background

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a complication of respiratory bacterial and viral infections such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).

Patients/Methods

In University Hospital La Paz (Madrid, Spain), we reviewed the clinical and demographic characteristics of 10 patients with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) PCR and Aspergillus spp. isolate in respiratory samples. We also recovered results of galactomannan tests in serum and/or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples.

Results

Eight male and two female from 51 to 76 years were recovered. They had reported risk factors to develop IPA (haematological malignancies, immunosuppression, diabetes, obesity, intensive care unit stay, among others). Azole susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated in nine patients and Aspergillus nidulans was isolated in one patient. Only one case was classified as probable aspergillosis, seven cases as putative aspergillosis, and two cases were not classifiable. Eight patients received antifungal treatment. Seven patients died (70%), two are still inpatient due to nosocomial infections and one was discharged referred to another institution.

Conclusions

This clinical entity has high mortality, and therefore, it should be performed surveillance with early galactomannan tests and cultures in respiratory samples in order to improve the outcome of the patients with this condition.

Keywords: Aspergillus, COVID‐19, immunosuppression, respiratory samples

1. INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, has emerged from Wuhan City (Hubei, China) and has become pandemic across the world. 1 This infection can cause severe respiratory disease with important rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. 2 Bacterial and fungal infections are complications of this viral pneumonia 3 , 4 due to the severe damage of lung tissue, cytokine storm and immune‐paralysis caused by viral infection‐induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 1 , 5 Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) has been reported in other respiratory virus such as Influenza viruses. 6 In this case, risk factors are haematological malignancies, solid transplant recipients, ICU stay, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), systemic corticosteroid administration or chronic kidney disease, among others. 5 , 7 It is essential to study if these factors or similar are related to the risk of developing COVID‐19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), as well as to clarify clinical significance of isolation of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples in these patients.

The aim of this study was to review the isolates of Aspergillus spp. from respiratory samples of patients with COVID‐19 during the three months of maximum incidence of COVID‐19 in the University Hospital La Paz in Madrid, Spain.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with positive PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 and isolation of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples in the same episode during three months (March‐May 2020) in University Hospital La Paz (Madrid, Spain), our tertiary care centre with 1286 beds. In these three months, we had a total of around 5,700 patients with positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR in the hospital (including our healthcare workers). All demographic, clinical and microbiological data were recovered from the clinical records of the patients.

Two commercial real‐time PCR were used indistinctly for the diagnosis of COVID‐19 in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchial aspirates (BAS): SARS‐CoV‐2 real‐time PCR Kit (Vircell, Granada, Spain) and TaqMan 2019 nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Sputa, BAS and bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) of the patients were cultured in standard fungal culture media. Aspergillus spp. strains were identified by culture characteristics, microscopic morphology and matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionisation‐time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF MS – Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) and susceptibility test to antifungal agents was performed by gradient diffusion strips according to the methodology of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 8 Galactomannan assays were performed in serum and/or BAL with Platelia Aspergillus antigen ELISA kit (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with a cut‐off index of 0.5 for both samples. COVID‐19 associated IPA cases were classified according to EORTC/MSG criteria 9 and AspICU algorithm. 10 According to Koehler et al 3 a confirmed COVID‐19 case with ICU stay was considered to meet the host criterion ‘Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency’ in AspICU algorithm. 10 This retrospective study had the approval of the Clinic Research Ethics Committee of University Hospital La Paz with the code PI‐4244.

3. RESULTS

Ten patients, eight male and two female with positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR and Aspergillus spp. isolates in respiratory samples were recovered (age range 51‐76 years, median age 69.5 years old). The patients had classic risk factors to develop pulmonary aspergillosis, such as diabetes, obesity, COPD, male sex and old age (≥65 years old). In four patients, the immunosuppressed underlying condition was due to haematological diseases, HIV and ankylosing spondylitis HLA B27+ under treatment with golimumab. Seven patients had an ICU stay with mechanical ventilation and all patients received corticosteroids with different administration routes as part of the anti‐COVID‐19 treatment (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of ten patients with COVID‐19 and isolation of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples

Case Sex/ Age (years) Underlying disease/ Risk factors Hospital stay SARS‐COV‐2 PCR (+) a Isolate/ Susceptibility test. MIC (μg/mL) a GM b Imaging procedures Corticoids treatment Anti‐COVID‐19 treatment Antifungal treatment (iv) EORTC c AspICU d , e Outcome
1 M/72

Myelodysplastic syndrome.

HIV.

COPD

Non‐ICU stay (43 days) Nasopharyngeal swab (day + 35)

A fumigatus in BAS (day + 18).

VOR: 0.06, POS: 0.12, ISA: 0.03, CAS: 0.03, AMB: 0.5.

Serum (1.97)

BAL (3.87)

Serum (0.12)

Serum (0.08)

CT: Interstitial infiltrates. Ground‐glass opacities iv, po, inh HCQ

VOR 300 mg/12 h (32 days)

CAS 50 mg/24 h (10 days)

(Combined treatment)

Probable N/C Died (day + 43)
2 M/67

DM 2.

COPD.

Obesity

ICU stay (10 days). MV BAS (day + 5) A fumigatus in BAS (day + 7) No RX: Interstitial infiltrates. Basal consolidation. Pleural effusion iv HCQ No N/C Putative Died (day + 10)
3 M/70

DM2.

Obesity

ICU stay (15 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day 0)

A fumigatus in BAS (day + 10).

VOR: 0.03, POS: 0.12, ISA: 0.06, CAS: 0.25, AMB: 0.12.

No RX: Bibasal infiltrates iv HCQ L/R AMB 240 mg/24 h (2 days) N/C Putative Died (day + 15)
4 M/51

Ankylosing spondylitis HLA B27+ (golimumab).

DM2

ICU stay (42 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day 0)

A fumigatus in 2 BAS (days + 7, +18).

VOR: 0.12, POS: 0.06, ISA: 0.06, CAS: 0.12, AMB: 0.12.

No RX: Bilateral interstitial opacities iv HCQ

AMB 300 mg/24 h (2 days)

ISA 200 mg/24 h (18 days)

AMB 250 mg/24 h (3 days)

(Sequential treatment)

N/C Putative Died (day + 42)
5 M/56 Acquired haemophilia A (prednisone) ICU stay (>100 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day −1)

A fumigatus in 5 BAS (days + 15, +23, +30, +40, +51).

VOR: 0.12, POS: 0.25, ISA: 0.12, CAS: 0.25, AMB: 0.12.

No RX: Ground‐glass opacities. iv, po

HCQ

TCZ

L/R

MICA 100 mg/24 h (15 days)

VOR 300 mg/12 h (3 days)

ISA 200 mg/24 h (15 days)

AMB 250 mg/24 h (3 days)

(Sequential treatment)

N/C Putative Still inpatient
6 F/69 DM2 ICU stay (20 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day −2)

A nidulans in BAS (day + 7).

VOR: 0.25, POS: 0.12, ISA: 0.03, CAS: 0.12, AMB: 2.

No RX: Ground‐glass opacities iv, inh

HCQ

TCZ

AMB 200 mg/24 h (7 days)

VOR 250 mg/12 h (1 day)

(Sequential treatment)

N/C Putative Died (day + 20)
7 F/76 Hypothyroidism ICU stay (34 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day −3)

A fumigatus in BAS (day + 25).

VOR: 0.094, POS: 0.25, ISA: 0.012, CAS: 0.12, AMB: 0.19.

No RX: Ground‐glass opacities iv, po HCQ No N/C Putative Died (day + 34)
8 M/73 DM2 ICU stay (>100 days). MV Nasopharyngeal swab (day + 2)

A fumigatus in BAS (day + 48).

VOR: 0.12, POS: 0.12, ISA: 0.12, CAS: 0.25, AMB: 0.25.

Serum (0.22) RX: Interstitial infiltrates iv

HCQ

TCZ

ANI 100 mg/24 h (2 days)

AMB 250 mg/24 h (26 days)

AMB 300 mg/24 h (7 days)

(Sequential treatment)

N/C Putative Still inpatient
9 M/71

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Chronic ischaemic heart disease. COPD

Non‐ICU stay (17 days) Nasopharyngeal swab (day −1) A fumigatus in sputum (day + 11) No RX: Bilateral diffuse opacities po, inh

HCQ

L/R

VOR 200 mg/12 h (4 days) N/C N/C Died (day + 17)
10 M/66 COPD Non‐ICU stay (18 days) Nasopharyngeal swab (day + 12) A fumigatus in BAL (day + 9)

BAL (2.16)

BAL (1.11)

RX: Interstitial infiltrates. Ground‐glass opacities iv, inh

HCQ

TCZ

L/R

VOR (posology not available, 6 weeks) N/C N/C Alive (Referred to other hospital) (day + 18)

Abbreviations: AMB, Amphotericin B; ANI, Anidulafungin; BAL, Bronchoalveolar lavage; BAS, Bronchial aspirate; CAS, Caspofungin; COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CT, Chest computerised tomography; DM2, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; GM, Galactomannan; HCQ, Hydroxychloroquine; ICU, Intensive care unit; INH, Inhaled; ISA, Isavuconazole; IV, Intravenous; L/R, Lopinavir/Ritonavir; MIC, Minimum inhibitory concentration; MICA, Micafungin; MV, Mechanical ventilation; N/C, Not classifiable; PO, Oral; POS, Posaconazole; RX, X‐Ray or radiograph; TCZ, Tocilizumab; VOR, Voriconazole.

a

Positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR and isolates of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples regarding hospital stay day (admission).

b

Galactomannan values ≥ 0.5 were considered positive in serum and BAL.

c

According to: Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA et al Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 5:ciz1008.

d

According to: Blot SI, Taccone FS, Van den Abeele et al A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:56‐64.

e

According to: Koehler P, Cornely OA, Böttiger BW et al COVID‐19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2020;63:528‐534.

PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnosis was performed in nine patients in samples from nasopharyngeal swab and in the other patient, PCR was performed in BAS. In four patients PCR was performed before hospital stay (days −3 to −1, in Emergency Department), in two patients at the moment of ICU admission (day 0) and in four remaining patients several days after hospital stay (day + 2 to + 35) (Table 1). After the COVID‐19 diagnosis, Aspergillus spp. isolates grew on culture media from deep respiratory samples: eight BAS (time range after positive PCR: 2‐46 days, median days: 13 days), one sputum (day + 11 after positive PCR) and one BAL (day + 9 after positive PCR). In two patients the isolate grew on two and five consecutive BAS cultures respectively (Table 1). Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated in nine patients and Aspergillus nidulans in one patient. Susceptibility to antifungal agents was performed in seven strains (Table 1). All tested antifungals showed good in vitro activity in A fumigatus strains and in the case of A nidulans, only amphotericin B did not show good activity (MIC = 2 μg/mL). Galactomannan assays were performed in only three patients, one with positive values in serum (1.97) and BAL (3.87) and another with positive values in two consecutives BAL samples (2.16, 1.11). The third patient had a negative galactomannan test in serum (0.22). Nine patients underwent imaging procedures by chest X‐ray or radiographs and only in one patient chest computerised tomography (CT Scan) was employed. In seven cases, it was observed bilateral basal or interstitial infiltrates and in five patients there were present ground‐glass opacities. Clinically, cough, fever, dyspnoea and/or respiratory insufficiency was observed in nine patients. Only one case was classified as probable aspergillosis, seven cases as putative aspergillosis, and two cases were not classifiable.

To treat COVID‐19 infection, all patients received hydroxychloroquine, four patients received tocilizumab and four patients received lopinavir/ritonavir. Eight patients received different intravenous antifungal therapies (four sequential and one combined treatments) due to the isolation of Aspergillus spp. (Table 1). Final outcome was seven deaths, two prolonged ICU hospitalisations and only one hospital discharge (the patient was referred to other hospital and survived).

4. DISCUSSION

Fungal infections associated to COVID‐19 have been reported since the pandemic originated, especially in ICU stay patients 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 and similarly to secondary infections associated to Influenza viruses. Most of the risk factors previously mentioned for IPA are common in both virus. 6 In our series, four out of ten patients had an immunosuppression due to haematological malignancies and/or after receiving immunosuppressive therapy. According to EORTC/MSG criteria, 9 there was only one case classified as probable IPA (imaging procedure was done by CT) and according to AspICU algorithm 10 there were seven cases classified as putative IPA and the two remaining cases were not able to be classified by neither algorithm because of lack of ICU stay (criterion of AspICU algorithm) CT scans (criterion of EORTC/MSG). The classification of IPA is very complex and non‐specific for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Furthermore, ground‐glass opacities and other patterns are unspecific and common to COVID‐19 pneumonia and IPA. Galactomannan test in serum is of little value in non‐neutropenic patients. 10 In our series, only one case (neutropenic patient) had positive values in serum and BAL. In the other case, the patient (non‐neutropenic) had positive values in two BAL samples after positive BAL culture. Due to the risk of false negative results in immunocompetent patients, in patients without risk factors or culture‐positive BAL, additional galactomannan test on BAL can be recommended to further strengthen the diagnosis. 10

Due to bad clinical state, eight patients received antifungals due to Aspergillus spp. isolation. Two remaining patients did not receive any therapy because they died few days after known the culture result. However, five patients finally died despite the treatment and two patients still inpatient in ICU for more than 100 days due to COVID‐19 and several nosocomial complications. More studies are needed in order to elucidate the real clinical significance of isolating Aspergillus spp. or other fungi in COVID‐19 cases. Nevertheless, it is a clinical entity which has high mortality and it should be recommended to perform fungal cultures with successive galactomannan tests in deep respiratory samples and/or serum in order to discard the presence of Aspergillus spp. in COVID‐19 patients with risk factors to develop CAPA.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Iker Falces‐Romero: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Methodology (lead); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (lead). Mario Ruiz‐Bastián: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Beatriz Díaz‐Pollán: Data curation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Emilio Maseda: Data curation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Julio García‐Rodriguez: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Members of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Working Group: María Dolores Montero‐Vega, María Pilar Romero‐Gómez, Silvia García‐Bujalance, Emilio Cendejas‐Bueno, Carlos Toro‐Rueda, Guillermo Ruiz‐Carrascoso, Inmaculada Quiles‐Melero, Fernando Lázaro‐Perona, Almudena Gutiérrez‐Arroyo, Patricia Girón de Velasco‐Sada, Iván Bloise‐Sánchez, Marina Alguacil‐Guillén, Patricia González‐Donapetry, Bartolomé Gómez‐Arroyo, Gladys Virginia Guédez‐López, Paloma García‐Clemente, María Gracia Liras Hernández, Consuelo García‐Sánchez, Miguel Ángel Sánchez‐Castellano and Sol María San José‐Villar.

Falces‐Romero I, Ruiz‐Bastián M, Díaz‐Pollán B, Maseda E, García‐Rodríguez J; SARS‐CoV‐2 Working Group . Isolation of Aspergillus spp. in respiratory samples of patients with COVID‐19 in a Spanish Tertiary Care Hospital. Mycoses. 2020;63:1144–1148. 10.1111/myc.13155

See Acknowledgment for the authors present in SARS‐CoV‐2 Working Group.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wang J, Yang Q, Zhang P, Sheng J, Zhou J, Qu T. Clinical characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID‐19 in Zheijiang, China: a retrospective case series. Crit Care. 2020;24:299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van Arkel ALE, Rijpstra TA, Belderbos HNA, van Wijngaarden P, Verweij PE, Bentvelsen RG. COVID‐19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:132‐135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Koehler P, Cornely OA, Böttiger BW, et al. COVID‐19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2020;63:528‐534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhou P, Liu Z, Chen Y, Xiao Y, Huang X, Fan XG. Bacterial and fungal infections in COVID‐19 patients: a matter of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;22:1‐2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Blaize M, Mayaux J, Nabet C, et al. Fatal invasive aspergillosis and coronavirus disease in a immunocompetent patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:1636‐1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Vanderbeke L, Spriet I, Breynaert C, Rijnders BJA, Verweij PE, Wauters J. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating severe influenza: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31:471‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Prattes J, Valentin T, Hoenigl M, Talakic E, Reisinger AC, Eller P. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating COVID‐19 in the ICU – A case report. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Espinel‐Ingroff A, Chowdhary A, Gonzalez GM, et al. Multicenter study of isavuconazole MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI M38–A2 broth microdilution method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3823‐3828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Blot SI, Taccone FS, Van den Abeele A‐M, et al. A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:56‐64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycoses are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES