Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jul 31;56(8):1173–1177. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15049

Update on the COVID‐19‐associated inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents; paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome‐temporally associated with SARS‐CoV‐2

Davinder Singh‐Grewal 1,2,3,4,, Ryan Lucas 1,2, Kristine Macartney 15,16, Allen C Cheng 5,6, Nicholas Wood 1,2, Genevieve Ostring 7,8, Philip Britton 1,2, Nigel Crawford 9,10,11, David Burgner 9,12,13,14
PMCID: PMC7436879  PMID: 32735721

Abstract

We provide an update on the state of play with regards a newly described inflammatory condition which has arisen during the current SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. The condition has been named paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. This condition has shown significant similarities to Kawasaki disease and toxic shock syndrome.


Paediatricians and many families are aware of the recent reports of a novel multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS‐C), which appears related to the ongoing SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. The condition has been named paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 (PIMS‐TS) by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 1 and MIS‐C by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in the USA 2 and World Health Organization. 3 Henceforth, we use the term PIMS‐TS to denote both of these described entities.

PIMS‐TS was first reported in the UK in late April through the European Union's Early Warning and Response System and has now been reported from other European centres, the USA and Middle East. Anecdotally, up to 1000 cases have been reported formally and informally. Fewer than 10 deaths have been publicly reported to date. No confirmed cases have been reported in Australia or New Zealand to date.

Overall, the reported infection rates with SARS‐CoV‐2 (the novel coronavirus) are lower in children than adults, and children are often asymptomatic or have comparatively milder acute manifestations. 4 Few children have required hospitalisation or intensive care admission as part of the acute infection. 5

Rather than a manifestation of primary infection, PIMS‐TS appears to be a severe but delayed immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection with uncontrolled inflammation resulting in host tissue damage. 6 The finding that many children with PIMS‐TS have positive SARS‐CoV‐2 serology but are PCR negative on nasopharyngeal swabs supports the hypothesis of a post‐infectious phenomenon. 7 , 8 , 9 This is also supported by the observation that the peak in PIMS‐TS cases lags behind the peak in acute SARS‐COV‐2 cases by some weeks. 7 The mechanisms are unknown, but it seems plausible that genetic variation in affected children may contribute to this rare syndrome. Both innate (non‐specific) and adaptive (both humoral and T‐cell mediated) arms of the immune system have been suggested to be involved. 9 , 10

A striking feature of PIMS‐TS is the overlap with Kawasaki disease (KD) and toxic shock syndrome (TSS), both vasculitides likely triggered by infection. 9 While SARS‐COV‐2 is the suspected aetiological agent causing PIMS‐TS, the cause of KD is unknown and may involve more than one infectious trigger. 11 Interestingly another novel coronavirus (coronavirus New Haven – HCoV‐NH/HCoV‐NL63) was previously implicated as the possible cause of KD in a series of cases in 2005, 11 but this finding could not be substantiated in other populations. 12

Children with PIMS‐TS seem to present with a severe illness characterised by shock and features often seen in KD or Kawasaki shock syndrome (KSS) (a rare, more severe form of KD that shares features with TSS). 13 These features include prolonged fever, rash, conjunctival injection, mucosal changes and raised inflammatory markers. While these features are common to both KSS and TSS, the inflammation seen in PIMS‐TS seems to be far greater than that of KD. 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 Other differentiating features of PIMS‐TS include an older age of onset (average of 10 years compared to 2 years for KD) and abdominal pain and diarrhoea as prominent presenting symptoms; myocardial and renal dysfunction have also been reported. 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 Additionally, children with PIMS‐TS have shown marked lymphopaenia and thrombocytopaenia, coagulopathy, raised cardiac enzymes (troponin and brain natriuretic peptide, BNP), hyponatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia and raised lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin; these features have only infrequently been reported in KD. 7 , 8 , 9

Early reports suggest that 20–25% of PIMS‐TS patients demonstrate coronary artery changes (similar to the rate in untreated KD 13 ); however giant coronary artery aneurysms were uncommon (<4%), 9 and most lesions have resolved relatively promptly (over a few weeks) with treatment. 7 , 8 , 13

As paediatricians are aware, KD has a much higher incidence in children of North East Asian ancestry 14 , 15 ; it is notable that PIMS‐TS has not yet been reported from Asia. Cases of PIMS‐TS reported to date have shown a possible over‐representation of children from African, African‐American and Afro‐Caribbean ancestry. 9 , 12 Hypothesised explanations for this observation include the effect of relative social disadvantage on disease exposure and transmission, as well as the possibility of a specific genetic predisposition to PIMS‐TS (analogous but distinct from that contributing to the ethnic differences in KD incidence 15 ).

Patients with PIMS‐TS have often required supportive treatment for hypotension and circulatory collapse. 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 Intravenous immunoglobulin (also the primary treatment for KD) and corticosteroids have also been used extensively, 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 with biologic agents and anticoagulants used in selected cases on appropriate subspecialty advice. There have been a small number of deaths, but generally the outcomes have been good, with few patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The long‐term cardiovascular outcomes are yet to be determined.

Interestingly, in early April clinicians in the USA reported a case of KD with concurrent COVID‐19, 16 and paediatricians in France and Italy (both of which have had high incidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection) reported marked increases in KD diagnoses (without shock but with positive SARS‐COV‐2 testing). 7 , 8 Many of the cases reported had incomplete KD with fever and less than four of the cardinal 5 clinical features of KD. 7 , 8 However, other regions have not reported any increases in KD overall during the pandemic. In Australia and New Zealand, where community transmission and incidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 remains low, there has not been any change in expected KD incidence in 2020 to date in as yet unpublished national surveillance data (http://www.paeds.org.au/covid-19-kawasaki-disease-kd-and-pims-ts-children). 17

At present, little is known about PIMS‐TS. It is unclear whether PIMS‐TS represents a severe form of KD triggered by SARS‐CoV‐2, or a separate entity with a spectrum of disease extending from a mild febrile illness through a KD‐like illness to a severe KSS/TSS‐like disease. As KD, KSS and TSS are all syndromic, with no diagnostic test, as shown by Whittaker et al., 9 it is difficult to define the boundaries between these phenotypes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Kawasaki disease (KD), Kawasaki shock syndrome (KSS), toxic shock syndrome (TSS) and paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome‐temporally associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 (PIMS‐TS): Comparison of key characteristics

Characteristic KD KSS TSS PIMS‐TS
Biology
Aetiology Unknown. Infectious trigger in genetically susceptible host suspected. 18 As for KD

Staphylococcus aureus producing TSST‐1, SE‐B, or SE‐C. (A significant proportion of staphylococcal TSS cases are still menstrual associated.)

Streptococcus pyogenes producing SPE‐A or SPE‐C 19

Role of SARS‐CoV‐2 as trigger suspected, with a latent period of 1–4 weeks. Preceding SARS‐CoV‐2 infection may be asymptomatic
Pathophysiology Systemic vasculitis with early activation of innate immune system (especially IL‐1, IL‐6, and TNF pathways) 18 Unknown, but likely severe pathophysiology with shared features of both KD and TSS KD SAG‐mediated stimulation of T‐cells causing massive cytokine release with capillary leak 19 Unknown. Cardiogenic and distributive shock reported. Myocardial dysfunction may be related to acute systemic inflammation. Abnormal coagulation characteristic
Epidemiology (in paediatric population)
Age, years – median Peak age ~ 2 years 9 , 20 Slightly older than KD 9 , 20 Reported as a similar age (Whittaker et al.) 9 or older than KSS (mean 9.4 years in Lin et al.) 9 , 21 Older than KSS (mean 9.6 years in Riphagen et al. and 9 years in Whittaker et al.) 7 , 9 , 22
Sex ratio (male:female) 1.4:1 20 Similar to KD 20 , 23 1:9 24 1.6:1 13 and 0.76:1 9
Ethnicity East Asian predominance 18 , 25 No data Caucasian predominance 24 Afro‐Caribbean prominence 9 , 13
Incidence Geographically widely variable. Australia: 17/100 000 per annum <5 years 5–7% of KD presentations 18 , 26 ~0.5/100000 per annum 19 No data
Clinical presentation
BP N 18 27 28 7 , 13
Oedema Non‐pitting, painful induration of hands and feet 18 As for KD. May develop generalised oedema from capillary leak Generalised non‐pitting oedema from capillary leak No data
Skin Polymorphous rash, petechiae not typical. Late periungual desquamation As for KD

Erythroderma, petechiae typical

Late desquamation

Rash in around 50% 9 , 13
Mucosa Mucosal hyperaemia, ulceration not typical 18 As for KD Mucosal hyperaemia, ulceration typical 28 Odynophagia in 3/8 13 and mucous membrane changes 29% 9
Eyes Non‐purulent conjunctival injection As for KD Non‐purulent conjunctival injection Conjunctivitis in 45–62.5% 9 , 13
Gastrointestinal Abdominal symptoms (pain, diarrhoea, vomiting) common 18 , 20 Abdominal symptoms (pain, diarrhoea, vomiting)more common than in KD 20 Vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain 28

Diarrhoea in 50–87% 9 , 13

Abdominal pain in 50–75% 9 , 13

Musculoskeletal Arthralgia and arthritis common 18 As for KD Myalgia +++ 28 Myalgia in 1/8 13
Neurological Irritability common 18 As for KD Headache, confusion 28 Headache in 25–25% 9 , 13
Renal Acute renal failure rare 20 Acute renal failure more common than in KD 20 Acute renal failure common 29 22% with acute renal injury 9 and 1/8 required renal replacement therapy 13
Echocardiogram findings
Coronary changes 5–25% 22 2–3 times more common than KD 20 , 27 No data 14% have coronary lesions 9 Giant aneurysms in 12–25% 9 , 13
Reduced EF Rare 20 Both cardiogenic and distributive shock reported frequently 20 , 23 , 30 Reported, but distributive shock predominates 31 , 32 Ventricular function abnormality in 31% 9 or 7/8. 13 Between 40 and 62% with shock had impaired EF 7 , 9
Laboratory findings
Total leukocyte count N/↑ 9 , 18 , 26 9 , 26 N/↑ 9 , 21 N/↓ 7 , 9
Neutrophil count N/↑ 9 , 18 , 26 9 , 26 N/↑ 9 , 21 N/↑ 7 , 9
Lymphocyte count N 9 , 18 N 9 ↑↑↑ 9 , 28 ↓↓ 7 , 9
Haemoglobin N/↓ 9 , 26 N/↓ 9 , 26 9 , 21 , 28 7 , 9
Platelet count

N, ↑↑ in 2nd–3rd week 18

↓ in severe cases 18

↑, however ↓ more common than in KD 9 , 21 , 27 9 , 21 , 28 7 , 9
Fibrinogen ↑ initially, normalises rapidly 33 , 34 N/↑ 26 , 34 27 7 , 9
d‐Dimer 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 9 , 34 9 , 28 ↑↑ 7 , 9
ESR 21 , 26 , 34 21 , 26 , 34 7 , 9
CRP 9 , 21 , 26 , 34 ↑↑ 9 , 21 , 26 , 34 ↑↑ 9 ↑↑ 7 , 9
Sodium N N/↓ 38 28 7 , 9
Creatinine N 21 21 28
Albumin N/↓ more in severe cases 9 , 18 , 20 ↓ more than in KD 9 , 20 ↓↓ 9 , 28 ↓↓ 7 , 9
Bilirubin N/↑ 18 No data 39 No data
Troponin N 9 N/↑ 9 , 21 , 38 No data ↑↑ 7 , 9
BNP N 37 No data ↑↑ 7
Ferritin N/↑ 9 , 40 , 41 9 No data ↑↑ 7 , 9
SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR No data No data No data Positive in 12–26% 7 , 9 , 13
SARS‐CoV‐2 serology No data No data No data Positive in 80–87% 7 , 9

BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C‐reactive protein; EF, ejection fraction; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SAG, superantigen; TNF, tissue necrosis factor.

We suggest that clinicians should be aware of this new condition and in the current pandemic should consider PIMS‐TS when assessing children with fever and a differential diagnosis of KD, TSS, fever and rash, severe abdominal pain or shock without obvious cause. As with any serious paediatric condition, clinicians should follow recommended clinical management pathways for COVID‐19, KD or TSS. For any patient with these conditions suspected to have PIMS‐TS, it is important to ensure testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 by PCR on appropriate specimens but to also collect a blood sample for testing of antibodies (serology) to SARS‐CoV‐2 prior to IVIG therapy along with convalescent serology. Suspected cases should be discussed with local specialist paediatric services (infectious diseases, rheumatology, intensive care, cardiology) as appropriate.

In Australia and New Zealand, few if any cases of PIMS‐TS would be expected if community transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 is low – particularly in children. Nevertheless, the Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance network, which already conducts national surveillance for KD and other conditions relevant to paediatrics (www.paeds.org.au) and The Influenza Complications Alert Network are working to establish active surveillance for PIMS‐TS in Australia. These groups will be collaborating with other networks to ensure cases of PIMS‐TS are rapidly detected and comprehensively investigated. For further information about surveillance and standardised data collection, please refer to http://www.paeds.org.au/covid-19-kawasaki-disease-kd-and-pims-ts-children

Conflict of interest: None declared.

[Correction added on 5th September 2020, after first online publication: Kristine Macartney's name has been corrected.]

References

  • 1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome and SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection in Children, 18. Stockholm: The Centre; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. CDC Health Alert Network . Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS‐C) Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Report No.: CDCHAN‐00432. Available from: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00432.asp [accessed 26 May 2020].
  • 3. WHO Global . Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children and Adolescents with COVID‐19. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Report No.: WHO/2019‐nCoV/Sci_Brief/Multisystem_Syndrome_Children/2020.1. Available from: https://www.who.int/news‐room/commentaries/detail/multisystem‐inflammatory‐syndrome‐in‐children‐and‐adolescents‐with‐covid‐19 [accessed 26 May 2020].
  • 4. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Coronavirus infections in children including COVID‐19: An overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2020; 39: 355–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y et al. Epidemiology of COVID‐19 among children in China. Pediatrics 2020; 145: e20200702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pain CE, Felsenstein S, Cleary G et al. Novel paediatric presentation of COVID‐19 with ARDS and cytokine storm syndrome without respiratory symptoms. Lancet Rheumatol 2020. 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30137-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki‐like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS‐CoV‐2 epidemic: An observational cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1771–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Toubiana J, Poirault C, Corsia A et al. Outbreak of kawasaki disease in children during COVID‐19 pandemic: A prospective observational study in Paris, France. BMJ 2020; 369: m2094. 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Whittaker E, Bamford A, Kenny J et al. Clinical characteristics of 58 children with a pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS‐CoV‐2. JAMA 2020; e2010369. 10.1001/jama.2020.10369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cheng MH, Zhang S, Porritt RA, Arditi M, Bahar I. An insertion unique to SARS‐CoV‐2 exhibits superantigenic character strengthened by recent mutations. bioRxiv 2020; 2020.05.21.109272. 10.1101/2020.05.21.109272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Burgner D, Harnden A. Kawasaki disease: What is the epidemiology telling us about the etiology? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2005; 9: 185–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lehmann C, Klar R, Lindner J, Lindner P, Wolf H, Gerling S. Kawasaki disease lacks association with human coronavirus NL63 and human Bocavirus. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2009; 28: 553–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Riphagen S, Gomez X, Gonzalez‐Martinez C, Wilkinson N, Theocharis P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID‐19 pandemic. Lancet 2020; 395: 1607–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Holman RC, Belay ED, Christensen KY, Folkema AM, Steiner CA, Schonberger LB. Hospitalizations for Kawasaki syndrome among children in the United States, 1997–2007. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2010; 29: 483–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Uehara R, Belay ED. Epidemiology of Kawasaki disease in Asia, Europe, and the United States. J. Epidemiol. 2012; 22: 79–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jones VG, Mills M, Suarez D et al. COVID‐19 and Kawasaki disease: Novel virus and novel case. Hosp. Pediatr. 2020; 10: 537–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Paediatric Active Enhanced Surveillance . COVID‐19, Kawasaki Disease (KD) and PIMS‐TS in Children. New South Wales, Australia: PAEDS; 2020. Available from: http://www.paeds.org.au/covid-19-kawasaki-disease-kd-and-pims-ts-children [accessed 4 June 2020].
  • 18. McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long‐term management of Kawasaki disease: A scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e927–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McCormick JK, Yarwood JM, Schlievert PM. Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: An update. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001; 55: 77–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Agrawal H, Altman CA, Seery TJ et al. Incidence and outcomes of Kawasaki shock syndrome in United States: 2004–2014. EC Cardiol. 2018; 5: 514–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lin Y‐J, Cheng M‐C, Lo M‐H, Chien S‐J. Early differentiation of Kawasaki disease shock syndrome and toxic shock syndrome in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2015; 34: 1163–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Burns JC et al. The treatment of Kawasaki syndrome with intravenous gamma globulin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986; 315: 341–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gatterre P, Oualha M, Dupic L et al. Kawasaki disease: An unexpected etiology of shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 872–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hajjeh RA, Reingold A, Weil A, Shutt K, Schuchat A, Perkins BA. Toxic shock syndrome in the United States: Surveillance update, 1979–1996. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999. Dec; 5: 807–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Onouchi Y. The genetics of Kawasaki disease. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2018. Jan; 21: 26–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kanegaye JT, Wilder MS, Molkara D et al. Recognition of a Kawasaki disease shock syndrome. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e783–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Dominguez SR, Friedman K, Seewald R, Anderson MS, Willis L, Glodé MP. Kawasaki disease in a pediatric intensive care unit: A case‐control study. Pediatrics 2008; 122: e786–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chesney PJ, Davis JP, Purdy WJ, Wand PJ, Chesney RW. Clinical manifestations of toxic shock syndrome. JAMA 1981; 246: 741–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chesney W, Joan P, Davis P, Segar E. Renal manifestations of the staphylococcal toxic‐shock syndrome. Am. J. Med. 1981; 71: 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Natterer J, Perez M‐H, Di Bernardo S. Capillary leak leading to shock in Kawasaki disease without myocardial dysfunction. Cardiol. Young 2012; 22: 349–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Burns JR, Menapace FJ. Acute reversible cardiomyopathy complicating toxic shock syndrome. Arch. Intern. Med. 1982; 142: 3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Crews JR. Stunned myocardium in the toxic shock syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 1992; 117: 912–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Shirahata A, Nakamura T, Asakura A. Studies on blood coagulation and antithrombotic therapy in Kawasaki disease. Pediatr. Int. 1983; 25: 180–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Li Y, Zheng Q, Zou L et al. Kawasaki disease shock syndrome: Clinical characteristics and possible use of IL‐6, IL‐10 and IFN‐γ as biomarkers for early recognition. Pediatr. Rheumatol. 2019; 17: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Imamura T, Yoshihara T, Yokoi K, Nakai N, Ishida H, Kasubuchi Y. Impact of increased D‐dimer concentrations in Kawasaki disease. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2005; 164: 526–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Masuzawa Y, Mori M, Hara T, Inaba A, Oba MS, Yokota S. Elevated d‐dimer level is a risk factor for coronary artery lesions accompanying intravenous immunoglobulin‐unresponsive Kawasaki disease: Risk factors for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2015; 19: 171–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Maggio MC, Corsello G, Prinzi E, Cimaz R. Kawasaki disease in Sicily: Clinical description and markers of disease severity. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2016; 42: 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yim D, Ramsay J, Kothari D, Burgner D. Coronary artery dilatation in toxic shock‐like syndrome: The Kawasaki disease shock syndrome. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2010; 31: 1232–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Esper F, Shapiro ED, Weibel C, Ferguson D, Landry ML, Kahn JS. Association between a novel human coronavirus and Kawasaki disease. J. Infect. Dis. 2005; 191: 499–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mizuta M, Shimizu M, Inoue N et al. Serum ferritin levels as a useful diagnostic marker for the distinction of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Kawasaki disease. Mod. Rheumatol. 2016; 26: 929–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yamamoto N, Sato K, Hoshina T, Kojiro M, Kusuhara K. Utility of ferritin as a predictor of the patients with Kawasaki disease refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Mod. Rheumatol. 2015; 25: 898–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES