Abstract
The aging of the brain is a well-investigated topic, but existing analyses have mainly focused on Caucasian samples. To investigate brain aging in East Asians, we measured cortical and subcortical volumes from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 1,008 cognitively normal elderly Koreans from the Gwangju Alzheimer’s and Related Dementia cohort and 342 Caucasians from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. To determine whether the aging effect varies with ethnicity and sex, beta coefficients of age and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in each ethnicity–sex group using a bootstrap method and a regression analysis using the relative volume to intracranial volume as predicted. The betas or aging slopes largely were not significantly different between ethnicity and sex groups in most types of brain structures. However, ethnic differences between the two female groups were found in the brain, most cortical regions, and a few subcortical regions. Ethnic differences in brain aging are likely due in large part to genetic factors; thus, we compared carriers and non-carriers of a gene relevant to longevity and neurodegenerative diseases, such as apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4. The regions with ethnic differences in women also showed significant differences between Korean APOE ε4 non-carriers and Caucasian APOE ε4 carriers. Furthermore, Caucasian women showed significant APOE ε4 effects in the largest number of regions. These results illustrate that much of the ethnic differences in females may be explained by synergistic effects of ethnic background and APOE ε4 carrier status. Our results suggest that sex-dependent differences of aging between ethnic backgrounds may be due to ethnicity-dependent effects of genetic risk factors, such as APOE ε4. We also presented the normative information on volume estimates of the brain structures of the elderly Korean people in the subdivided age groups. This normative information of the aging brain stratified by ethnicity provides the age-related reference ranges quantified to replace visual judgment and facilitate precise clinical decision-making.
Keywords: normal aging, aging slope, norm, ethnic difference, sex difference
Introduction
The world’s population is aging rapidly as people live longer than before. According to the international population reports (He et al., 2016), the elderly population aged 65 and over is 617 million people and 8.5% of the total population in 2018. By 2050, the elderly population is projected to nearly triple to 1.6 billion worldwide. The aging brain becomes a very important and focused research topic. The human brain has been assessed non-invasively and so massively since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) became popular. Early imaging studies identified the general trend that the brain shrank with advancing age, and the ventricle expanded, and additionally found regional variations in the effects of aging on the brain (Resnick et al., 2003; Scahill et al., 2003; Sowell et al., 2003).
The aging brain is a well-investigated topic. However, most researchers did not consider ethnic backgrounds and studied a sample of Westerners with a high percentage of Caucasians. Existing findings are mainly a reflection of Caucasians (Resnick et al., 2003; Scahill et al., 2003; Sowell et al., 2003; Ledig et al., 2018). Furthermore, in recent years, more and more studies are increasingly dependent on only a few data sources that are virtually monopolistic, such as the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; Weiner et al., 2015; Ledig et al., 2018). Asia now accounts for more than half of the world’s elderly population, and the proportion is expected to increase to two-thirds by 2050 (He et al., 2016). Particularly, the aging brain of East Asians has not been fully studied. It is not clear whether there are ethnic differences in the aging brain.
The study aimed to present the normative information of the aging change of the brain, including cortical and subcortical volumes, and to determine which factors, such as ethnicity and sex, affect the volumes in normal elderly people. For this purpose, we recruited 1,008 cognitively normal elderly people with brain MRI at the Gwangju Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias (GARD) cohort in the South Korea. The subjects were examined on only a single MR scanner to reduce inter-scanner variability of the brain images. Our MRI dataset could provide one of the most definite illustrations of the aging process of the human brain. For a Caucasian sample, we collected brain images from the ADNI dataset, which was, however, from multiple centers. Because the ADNI datasets were from diverse scanners and the resulting imaging protocols were different from ours, the absolute volume measures could be biased from each other. Thus, subjects should be used as their own control as much as possible. We analyzed the two datasets separately and quantified volumes and aging slopes at each race or sex level. Cortical and subcortical volumes relative to their intracranial volumes were used for analysis rather than absolute volumes.
We evaluated ethnic differences in cortical and subcortical volumes and their aging slopes. Our hypothesis was that ethnic differences in brain aging were due in large part to a gene relevant to longevity and neurodegenerative diseases, such as apolipoprotein E (APOE; Bonomini et al., 2010; Reinvang et al., 2013). The rationale was as follows: (1) Ethnic differences were from different genetic backgrounds. (2) APOE ε4, a major genetic risk factor for degenerative brain diseases (Shi et al., 2017; Sepulcre et al., 2018), is more popular in Caucasians (APOE ε4 carriers = 29.2 and 24.2% for women and men, respectively) than in Koreans (17.0 and 17.6%, respectively). (3) The odds ratio (OR) and the carrier ratio of APOE ε4 vary with age, sex, or ethnicity (Farrer et al., 1997).
We discovered ethnic differences of aging slopes in women, compared the APOE ε4 carriers and the non-carriers in them, and showed that the ethnic differences were partly due to APOE ε4 effects enhanced in women of a certain ethnicity. We also investigated the normative information on volume estimates of the brain of the elderly people in the subdivided age groups. This normative information of the aging brain stratified by ethnicity provides the age-related reference ranges needed to facilitate research and precise clinical decision-making close to personalized diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
Materials and Methods
Participants
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Chosun University Hospital, South Korea. All volunteers or the next of kin of patients gave written informed consent before participation. They were registered at the GARD cohort in the South Korea, from April 2014 to March 2017. One-thousand and eight cognitively normal elderly people (CN) aged 65–85 years were included in this study. All participants were evaluated by comprehensive interviews, neurological examinations, and neuropsychological tests. Neuropsychological tests consist of the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR; Morris, 1993), and Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB; Kang et al., 2012). SNSB is a comprehensive neuropsychological test that assesses five cognitive domains: attention, language, visuospatial function, memory, and frontal/executive function (Kang et al., 2012). The exclusion criteria for all subjects were presence of a focal lesion on brain MRI, history of head trauma, or psychiatric disorders that could affect their mental function. Individuals with minor medical abnormalities were included.
The CN participants were selected based on two exclusion criteria: (i) their K-MMSE score is <19 points; and (ii) people with cognitive impairment in one or more domains among the five cognitive domains of SNSB were excluded. The criterion for cognitive impairment was a standard z score <−1.5. For diagnosis, we used the standard z score for each cognitive domain that was standardized in a normative sample of 1,067 elderly people ranging in age from 45 to 90 years (Kang et al., 2012).
To investigate ethnic difference, we collected Caucasians excluding Hispanics (342 CN cases) from the ADNI database1. For image quality, their brain MRI images were selected with a slice thickness <1.2 mm. The age range was matched with our dataset (65–85 years). Table 1 describes the socio-demographic information of the Korean and Caucasian subjects.
Table 1.
Cohort | Subjects | Age | MMSE | Education | APOE | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | n | Mean (y) | SD | Mean | SD | Mean (y) | SD | n | ε4 (%) | |
Korean (GARD) | F | 638 | 72.1 | 4.3 | 27.1 | 2.2 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 534 | 17.0 |
M | 370 | 74.3 | 5.0 | 27.8 | 1.6 | 12.2 | 4.0 | 296 | 17.6 | |
Caucasian (ADNI) | F | 163 | 74.5 | 4.8 | 29.2 | 1.1 | 15.5 | 2.6 | 161 | 29.2 |
M | 179 | 75.6 | 5.2 | 29.0 | 1.1 | 17.0 | 2.6 | 179 | 24.6 | |
Two-way ANOVA (ethnicity, sex) | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
Ethnicity | 54.9 | <0.001 | 235.1 | <0.001 | 778.1 | <0.001 | 13.8 | <0.001 | ||
Sex | 48.6 | <0.001 | 27.3 | <0.001 | 235.8 | <0.001 | 0.2 | 0.659 | ||
Ethnicity*sex | 3.5 | 0.063 | 15.5 | <0.001 | 24.7 | <0.001 | 0.9 | 0.323 |
GARD, Gwangju Alzheimer’s & Related Dementia, Korea; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; MMSE, mini mental state examination; APOE, apolipoprotein E gene; F, female; M, male; y, years.
MRI Acquisition
We recruited a large number of Koreans (n = 1,008) and acquired sub-millimeter resolution brain images at a single MR scanner to minimize variances between brain images. Since there are no sub-millimeter resolution images in the ADNI dataset, we selected near-millimeter resolution images of Caucasian brains, which were scanned at multiple centers.
For Koreans, three-dimensional (3D) sagittal brain images (MPRAGE; TR = 2,300 ms; TE = 2.143 ms; TI = 900 ms; FA = 9°; FoV = 256 × 256; matrix = 320 × 320; slice thickness = 0.8 mm) were acquired at the 3.0 T MR scanner (Skyra, Siemens; 20-channel head coil) at Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea. For Caucasians, 3D brain images with 1.2 mm or less slice thickness were acquired by diverse manufacturers and scanner models. The MRI scanner protocols were described in detail according to each scanner model at the ADNI site2.
Measurement of Cortical and Subcortical Volumes
The volumes of cortical and subcortical structures were measured from each brain image using the standard recon-all processing pipeline of FreeSurfer version 5.3.0, which is documented and available for download online3. Briefly, the steps of the process include automated Talairach transformation, segmentation of the subcortical white matter and deep gray matter volumetric structures (including hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, putamen, and ventricles; Fischl et al., 2002), intensity normalization (Sled et al., 1998), segmentation of the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and surface modeling for the GM/WM and GM/CSF borders (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 2001). Once the cortical models are complete, a number of deformable procedures can be performed for further data processing and analysis including surface inflation (Fischl et al., 1999a), registration to a spherical atlas that utilized individual cortical folding patterns to match cortical geometry across subjects (Fischl et al., 1999b), parcellation of the cerebral cortex into units based on gyral and sulcal structure (Fischl et al., 2004; Desikan et al., 2006), and creation of a variety of surface-based data including maps of curvature and sulcal depth. This method uses both intensity and continuity information from the entire 3D MR volume in segmentation and deformation procedures to produce representations of cortical thickness, calculated as the closest distance from the GM/WM boundary to the GM/CSF boundary at each vertex on the tessellated surface (Fischl and Dale, 2000). To acquire consistent brain measures, we used the Desikan–Killiany–Tourville (DKT) atlas (Klein and Tourville, 2012) that has advantages where the regional definitions are unambiguous, and the boundaries are well suited to the FreeSurfer classifier algorithm.
APOE Genotyping
Genomic DNA samples of Koreans were extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes that were isolated from whole blood collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes. The samples were genotyped using a genome-wide genotyping array (Affymetrix Axiom® KORV1.0, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which was designed and optimized for Korean content by the Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health, South Korea (Jee et al., 2016). The genotyping was performed at DNALink (Seoul, South Korea). APOE genotypes were derived from allelic combinations of rs7412 and rs429358, which are included in the genotyping array.
Statistical Analysis
Aging slopes, or annual percent changes, for cortical and subcortical volumes were calculated using the general linear model in R software version 3.5.34. The model was adopted to be linear because the age range was narrow for our subjects, and the relationship between age and gray matter volume is nearly linear from adulthood (Sowell et al., 2003; Fox and Schott, 2004; Fjell et al., 2009b; Salthouse, 2011). The linear regression model analyses were performed controlling for sex, education, and intracranial volume on a large single-center sample (n = 1,008) from the GARD cohort. To find standard errors (SEs) of aging slopes, bootstrapping was used (Davison and Hinkley, 1997). A bootstrap was performed with 10,000 iterations.
In Table 2, the linear regression model analyses were performed using age, sex, ethnicity, education, and intracranial volume as predictors on each volume from both the GARD and ADNI databases (n = 1,350), and the Bonferroni correction as the most conservative approach to the multiple comparison problem was applied across 15 brain regions, resulting in a p threshold of 0.003 (p uncorrected = 0.05/15; p corrected = 0.05).
Table 2.
Age | Sex | Ethnicity | Education | ICV | Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | p | b | p | b | p | b | p | b | p | R2 | |
Brain volume | −0.30 | 1.1E-84 | −0.03 | 1.1E-01 | −0.32 | 1.0E-66 | 0.00 | 9.6E-01 | 0.87 | 1.9E-297 | 0.752 |
Cortical volumes | |||||||||||
Frontal | −0.18 | 1.4E-22 | 0.00 | 8.7E-01 | −0.43 | 8.3E-73 | 0.02 | 5.2E-01 | 0.73 | 1.5E-163 | 0.589 |
Temporal | −0.31 | 2.5E-57 | 0.02 | 3.9E-01 | −0.46 | 1.3E-83 | −0.02 | 3.7E-01 | 0.65 | 6.2E-141 | 0.597 |
Parietal | −0.18 | 8.1E-24 | −0.05 | 2.1E-02 | −0.62 | 9.1E-142 | 0.02 | 3.5E-01 | 0.63 | 1.2E-137 | 0.609 |
Occipital | −0.25 | 2.4E-32 | 0.03 | 2.5E-01 | −0.47 | 2.9E-68 | 0.02 | 4.9E-01 | 0.53 | 5.2E-80 | 0.468 |
Cingulate | −0.14 | 8.2E-11 | 0.01 | 6.9E-01 | −0.38 | 1.8E-45 | 0.04 | 1.6E-01 | 0.64 | 5.9E-108 | 0.459 |
Insular | −0.06 | 8.8E-03 | 0.07 | 1.8E-02 | −0.33 | 5.1E-35 | 0.00 | 9.5E-01 | 0.62 | 4.2E-98 | 0.437 |
Subcortical volumes | |||||||||||
Ventricle | 0.34 | 2.7E-50 | −0.04 | 2.1E-01 | 0.08 | 1.6E-03 | −0.02 | 5.2E-01 | 0.51 | 2.8E-68 | 0.420 |
Thalamus | −0.18 | 3.7E-15 | −0.05 | 1.1E-01 | −0.49 | 8.9E-65 | 0.01 | 6.7E-01 | 0.49 | 2.4E-62 | 0.386 |
Putamen | −0.25 | 2.8E-22 | −0.03 | 3.0E-01 | −0.01 | 7.4E-01 | 0.04 | 2.3E-01 | 0.41 | 3.4E-35 | 0.203 |
Hippocampus | −0.42 | 1.1E-67 | −0.01 | 7.8E-01 | −0.38 | 2.7E-41 | 0.03 | 3.0E-01 | 0.27 | 3.4E-21 | 0.371 |
Caudate | −0.06 | 1.6E-02 | −0.12 | 1.9E-04 | 0.09 | 1.8E-03 | 0.02 | 4.9E-01 | 0.52 | 1.2E-56 | 0.243 |
Amygdala | −0.32 | 7.4E-38 | 0.12 | 1.7E-04 | −0.37 | 4.2E-35 | 0.03 | 3.6E-01 | 0.27 | 8.0E-19 | 0.305 |
Pallidus | 0.04 | 1.0E-01 | −0.01 | 6.8E-01 | −0.12 | 8.8E-05 | −0.03 | 4.4E-01 | 0.43 | 2.5E-36 | 0.164 |
Accumbens | −0.33 | 3.5E-33 | 0.06 | 1.0E-01 | 0.09 | 5.0E-03 | 0.07 | 4.5E-02 | 0.14 | 3.4E-05 | 0.144 |
Age, sex, ethnicity, education, and intracranial volume (ICV) were used as predictors in the regression analyses. p indicates statistical significance. b indicates the standardized regression coefficient that is presented in italic at the 95% significance level, or in bold after Bonferroni correction.
Availability of Data
The GARD data that support the findings of this study are not openly available yet. Until we are ready to share the data publicly, the data could be available from the corresponding author (BK or KL), upon reasonable request.
Results
Cortical Volumes and Socio-demographic Effects
As shown in Table 2, the brain volume was significantly affected by age (b = −0.30; p < 0.003) and ethnicity (b = −0.32; p < 0.003), but not by sex and education. The brain shrank with increasing age, and the Caucasian brain was smaller than the Korean brain.
Cortical gray matter volumes showed similar patterns to the brain volume: all the cortical volumes decreased significantly with age. The insular volume only showed a marginal aging effect (b = −0.06; p = 0.0088), which was not significant after Bonferroni correction. All cortical volumes were different between the ethnic groups: Koreans had bigger cortical volumes than Caucasians (b’s <−0.3; p’s < 0.003). There were no significant sex differences after Bonferroni correction. Only weak sex differences were found in the parietal (b = −0.05; p = 0.021) and insular cortices (b = 0.07; p = 0.018).
Subcortical Volumes and Socio-demographic Effects
Although other subcortical structures showed similar patterns to the cortical structures, some subcortical volumes appeared out of the ordinary pattern. The pallidus was not significantly affected by age (b = 0.04; p > 0.1). In contrast to all cortical structures that were bigger in Koreans, the ventricle (b = 0.08; p < 0.003) and caudate (b = 0.09; p < 0.003) were bigger in Caucasians, and the putamen displayed no ethnic difference (b = −0.01; p > 0.7). There were significant sex differences in two regions: the caudate was bigger in women (b = −0.12; p < 0.003) and the amygdala was bigger in men (b = 0.12; p < 0.003). Only a weak education effect was found in the accumbens (b = 0.07; p = 0.045).
Aging Slopes in Koreans and Caucasians
The results of the previous regression analysis could be simply summarized: the brain structures were affected by age, ethnicity, and sex, not by education. Therefore, we classified the subjects into four groups based on ethnicity and sex: female and male groups of Koreans and of Caucasians, and determined the aging effect on the brain structures of each group, using a regression analysis with age as independent variables (Figure 1). As a dependent variable, a volume relative to intracranial volume (ICV) was used because age and ICV were significantly correlated (r = 0.12; p < 0.003). Bootstrap technique was used for producing the CI of an aging slope or a beta coefficient of age (Tables s 3, 4).
Table 3.
Female | Male | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian | Korean | Caucasian | Korean | |||||
Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | |
Brain volume | −0.791 | [−1.152, −0.574] | −0.408 | [−0.486, −0.329] | −0.612 | [−0.760, −0.457] | −0.513 | [−0.598, −0.428] |
Cortical volumes | ||||||||
Frontal | −0.664 | [−1.018, −0.342] | −0.155 | [−0.257, −0.050] | −0.491 | [−0.741, −0.245] | −0.323 | [−0.422, −0.221] |
Temporal | −0.941 | [−1.268, −0.632] | −0.439 | [−0.544, −0.338] | −0.684 | [−0.955, −0.433] | −0.570 | [−0.691, −0.456] |
Parietal | −0.828 | [−1.141, −0.517] | −0.207 | [−0.315, −0.098] | −0.584 | [−0.848, −0.315] | −0.349 | [−0.473, −0.222] |
Occipital | −1.114 | [−1.541, −0.722] | −0.344 | [−0.480, −0.205] | −0.615 | [−0.903, −0.309] | −0.659 | [−0.820, −0.496] |
Cingulate | −0.649 | [−1.069, −0.275] | −0.218 | [−0.364, −0.074] | −0.196 | [−0.460, 0.059] | −0.347 | [−0.515, −0.182] |
Insular | −0.478 | [−0.835, −0.145] | 0.025 | [−0.105, 0.162] | −0.130 | [−0.448, 0.177] | −0.048 | [−0.203, 0.110] |
Subcortical volumes | ||||||||
Ventricle | 2.187 | [0.549, 3.741] | 4.176 | [3.527, 4.815] | 2.869 | [1.935, 3.904] | 2.796 | [2.181, 3.427] |
Thalamus | −0.832 | [−1.286, −0.534] | −0.210 | [−0.381, −0.023] | −0.490 | [−0.774, −0.207] | −0.406 | [−0.605, −0.205] |
Putamen | −0.550 | [−1.058, 0.008] | −0.734 | [−0.960, −0.500] | −0.496 | [−0.835, −0.136] | −0.714 | [−0.976, −0.441] |
Hippocampus | −1.588 | [−2.074, −1.122] | −0.886 | [−1.057, −0.723] | −1.220 | [−1.605, −0.825] | −0.977 | [−1.193, −0.761] |
Caudate | −0.010 | [−0.520, 0.571] | −0.144 | [−0.322, 0.036] | −0.058 | [−0.433, 0.351] | −0.236 | [−0.476, 0.003] |
Amygdala | −1.697 | [−2.375, −1.078] | −0.652 | [−0.835, −0.468] | −1.046 | [−1.558, −0.531] | −0.918 | [−1.159, −0.683] |
Pallidus | −0.243 | [−0.664, 0.187] | 0.383 | [0.140, 0.613] | −0.183 | [−0.493, 0.149] | 0.236 | [−0.089, 0.575] |
Accumbens | −1.635 | [−2.409, −0.759] | −1.465 | [−1.784, −1.147] | −1.602 | [−2.345, −0.932] | −1.137 | [−1.502, −0.772] |
Values are presented in % per year, and based on 10,000 iterations of linear regression analysis. Slope is presented in bold if the 95% confidence interval (CI) does not include the value of zero.
Table 4.
Female Caucasian | Female Korean | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOE ε4 non-carrier | APOE ε4 carrier | APOE ε4 non-carrier | APOE ε4 carrier | |||||
Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | Slope | 95% CI | |
Brain volume | −0.624 | [−0.876, −0.405] | −1.234 | [−2.39, −0.739] | −0.387 | [−0.481, −0.290] | −0.573 | [−0.771, −0.376] |
Cortical volumes | ||||||||
Frontal | −0.495 | [−0.859, −0.163] | −1.078 | [−2.008, −0.296] | −0.104 | [−0.230, 0.034] | −0.264 | [−0.555, −0.006] |
Temporal | −0.713 | [−1.043, −0.385] | −1.446 | [−2.199, −0.708] | −0.451 | [−0.582, −0.326] | −0.381 | [−0.632, −0.101] |
Parietal | −0.635 | [−0.994, −0.281] | −1.370 | [−2.029, −0.704] | −0.203 | [−0.334, −0.064] | −0.270 | [−0.598, 0.057] |
Occipital | −0.862 | [−1.347, −0.420] | −1.830 | [−2.599, −0.965] | −0.310 | [−0.474, −0.136] | −0.512 | [−0.870, −0.129] |
Cingulate | −0.528 | [−0.963, −0.124] | −0.960 | [−1.964, −0.153] | −0.146 | [−0.317, 0.028] | −0.261 | [−0.637, 0.094] |
Insular | −0.225 | [−0.563, 0.116] | −1.135 | [−2.111, −0.325] | 0.005 | [−0.161, 0.176] | 0.277 | [−0.054, 0.594] |
Subcortical volumes | ||||||||
Ventricle | 1.694 | [−0.152, 3.487] | 3.116 | [0.103, 5.803] | 4.183 | [3.472, 4.929] | 4.360 | [2.144, 6.486] |
Thalamus | −0.665 | [−0.994, −0.359] | −1.261 | [−2.637, −0.487] | −0.213 | [−0.416, 0.000] | −0.465 | [−0.959, 0.076] |
Putamen | −0.277 | [−0.859, 0.371] | −1.693 | [−2.473, −0.730] | −0.741 | [−0.995, −0.483] | −0.602 | [−1.248, 0.052] |
Hippocampus | −1.383 | [−1.906, −0.880] | −2.104 | [−3.304, −1.037] | −0.967 | [−1.163, −0.753] | −0.636 | [−1.055, −0.227] |
Caudate | 0.235 | [−0.327, 0.954] | −0.942 | [−2.032, −0.111] | −0.055 | [−0.271, 0.169] | −0.288 | [−0.777, 0.140] |
Amygdala | −1.394 | [−2.098, −0.700] | −2.419 | [−4.208, −0.973] | −0.561 | [−0.754, −0.367] | −0.700 | [−1.110, −0.145] |
Pallidus | 0.041 | [−0.458, 0.512] | −1.263 | [−1.965, −0.599] | 0.379 | [0.094, 0.662] | 0.343 | [−0.381, 0.998] |
Accumbens | −1.092 | [−2.029, −0.053] | −2.899 | [−4.242, −1.525] | −1.515 | [−1.906, −1.111] | −1.364 | [−2.178, −0.576] |
Values are presented in % per year, and based on 10,000 iterations of linear regression analysis. Slope is presented in bold if the 95% confidence interval (CI) does not include the value of zero.
Regardless of ethnicity or sex, the brain shrank with age (Table 3). Although the aging slopes of brain volume were statistically significant in all the groups, a significant group difference of the aging slopes was found in a comparison of the relative volumes between the two female ethnic groups. In female aging slope, Caucasians were significantly steeper than Koreans (Figure 2).
Four of the six cortical structures, the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices, showed the same pattern as the brain volume did: the four cortical volumes decayed during aging in all the groups (Table 3) and confirmed that Caucasian women had steeper aging slopes than Korean women. The cingulate cortex appeared to follow the main trend in general, although the ethnic difference in women was not statistically significant. Interestingly, the insula largely did not seem to be affected by aging except that it had a significant slope in female Caucasians.
Among the eight subcortical structures, four, the thalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, and accumbens, followed the general trends shown above. The four subcortical volumes decreased during aging for all the groups and kept the tendency of the steeper slopes in Caucasian women than in Korean women, although the CIs of the female groups were overlapped in one of the four structures, the accumbens. However, the other subcortical structures showed two other types of patterns besides the general trend. The first type is influenced by aging as well, but with a weak reverse ethnic difference. The ventricle expanded with age for all the groups and showed a weak reverse ethnic difference: Korean women had a steeper albeit insignificant slope than Caucasian women. The putamen decreased with age for all the groups except Caucasian women whose CI spanned a little over zero, and also showed weak reverse ethnic differences, such as the ventricle. The second type did not appear to be affected by aging. The caudate and pallidus were relatively stable during aging in all the groups and in all other groups than Korean women, respectively.
Aging Slopes in Women: APOE ε4 Carriers vs. Non-carriers
To test whether ethnic differences in women were due to APOE ε4, the two female groups were divided according to APOE ε4 carrier status, and their aging slopes were compared (Figure 3). The results were consistent with the hypothesis. The aging slopes of Caucasian APOE ε4 carriers were significantly steeper than those of Korean APOE ε4 non-carriers or carriers in most of the brain structures showing the ethnic differences in women. It explains much of the ethnic difference in females.
APOE ε4 Effects on Cortical and Subcortical Structures in Aging Slope
To investigate the within-group APOE ε4 effects on the aging slopes of cortical and subcortical structures, the effect sizes of APOE ε4, or the distance from the aging slope of APOE ε4 non-carriers to the aging slope of carriers, were calculated and compared between ethnicity and sex groups. Overall, Caucasian women seemed to be the biggest in the APOE ε4 effects, and Caucasian men seemed to be the second. Caucasian women showed five significant effects in the brain and the four subcortical structures, such as the putamen, caudate, pallidus, and accumbens, whereas Caucasian men had three significant effects in the two cortical and one subcortical structures, such as the temporal and insular cortices and pallidus (Figure 4). Korean women and men did not have any significant effect. The results support that the effects of the genetic risk factor may vary with ethnicity and sex.
Norms of Brain Structures of Koreans and Caucasians
The previous analysis using bootstrap technique revealed that aging effects on some brain structures were divergent across ethnicity and sex. Therefore, the norms of the brain structures need to be subdivided according to ethnicity, sex, and age group of a 5-year range. The norms were evaluated in relative volume to ICV for Koreans (Supplementary Table S1) and Caucasians (Supplementary Table S2). Additionally, the norms of absolute volume were assessed for Koreans (Supplementary Table S3) and Caucasians (Supplementary Table S4).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate ethnical disparities in normal aging by using a large single-scanner sample of old people with a narrow age range, which is supportive to make robust conclusions in the absence of differing study methodologies (Shen et al., 2017). Although Caucasian brain images were much different from our images in terms of MRI protocols, scanner models, image resolution, and so on, the volume loss per year rate conceptually very similar to the aging slope is revealed to be consistent across the different cohorts and independent from the scanner applied (Schippling et al., 2017). Our results from this unusually large, single-scanner sample provide one of the most extensive characterizations of age-associated decay rate in the human brain.
Age and ethnicity were found to significantly affect the brain volume. The cortical and insular volumes revealed a gradual decrease by age and a marginal aging effect, respectively. In addition, all cortical structures were significantly bigger in Koreans than in Caucasians, except for the ventricle and caudate that were significantly bigger in Caucasians, and the putamen showed no significant difference. Moreover, sex disparity was observed in the caudate and amygdala, which were significantly bigger in women and in men, respectively. Notably, the aging slope for Caucasian women was significantly steeper than that for Korean women. According to our data, it seemed to be associated with the extent of decay during aging in four cortical structures, including the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices, that revealed steeper aging slope in female Caucasians than in female Koreans. In addition, the insula significantly decreased age dependently in Caucasian women only.
The prevalence of APOE ε4 needs to be considered when interpreting our results that the proportion of APOE ε4 carriers was previously reported to be higher in Caucasians (Shi et al., 2017; Sepulcre et al., 2018). The susceptibility for APOE ε4 effects was highest in Caucasians, followed by Koreans, and direct comparison among APOE ε4 carriers indicated significantly steeper aging slopes in Caucasians than in Koreans. These results suggest that the ethnicity may be independently associated with the aging slope, and furthermore that the ethnicity is a decisive factor for the extent of brain aging along with some known risk factors, such as APOE ε4, potentially due to genetic disparities.
Our results were consistent with previous studies of sex differences in APOE ε4 effects. In the normal populations, 20–30% of Caucasian individuals carry APOE ε4, whereas 17% of East Asians do (Saunders et al., 1993; Farrer et al., 1997). Our results showed similar proportions of APOE ε4 carriers. Women with APOE ε4 genotype are known to have an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared with men with APOE ε4. Farrer et al. (1997) and Neu et al. (2017) reported the increased risk of Caucasian women with APOE ε4 compared with Caucasian men between the ages of 65 and 75 years. We also found that APOE ε4 made steeper aging slopes of the brain structures in Caucasian women. Previous studies explained that the increased risk of Caucasian women with APOE ε4 is attributed to female sex hormones, such as estrogen (Yaffe, 2001; Jacobs et al., 2013). Additionally, there are some evidence of sex differences in the association between APOE ε4 carrier status and AD biomarkers (Farrer et al., 1997; Raber et al., 1998; Damoiseaux et al., 2012). In Koreans, we found that APOE ε4 has no difference in AD risk between female and male carriers, but only the increased aging slope of the ventricle in women regardless of APOE ε4 carrier status (Figure 2).
The brain morphometry of East Asians has been known to be different from that of Caucasians and Africans although AD-associated patterns of brain atrophy are reported to exhibit no ethnic difference (Fan et al., 2019). East Asian brains are the largest in terms of cranial size (Beals et al., 1984; Howells, 1990; Rushton, 2000). East Asian hemispheres are shorter and wider than Caucasian hemispheres using MRI (Zilles et al., 2001). East Asians are found to have larger temporal and cingulate gyri than Caucasians using a surface-based morphometry method (Chee et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2018). In addition, Africans were reported to exhibit larger left orbito-frontal cortex than Caucasians (Isamah et al., 2010). Furthermore, the authors stressed the inclusion of ethnic minorities in clinical research because the inclusion is critical for generalizability of research findings. Even in this context, the normative information stratified by ethnicity is important. We also presented the normative information on volume estimates of the brain structures of the elderly Korean people in the subdivided age groups. This normative information of the aging brain stratified by ethnicity provides the age-related reference ranges quantified to replace visual assessment that is dependent on the subjective judgment of the examiner and needed to facilitate research and precise clinical decision-making close to personalized diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
In conclusion, our results provide that gender and ethnicity contribute differentially to the global brain atrophy observed in normal elderly Korean and Caucasian males and females, and discover that changes in brain volume may be due to the ethnicity-dependent effects of the genetic risk of carrying APOE ε4.
Limitation
The Caucasian sample was not a single-scanner dataset, but MRI images from diverse scanner models including our model. The scanner diverseness may increase the error variance of the results in Caucasians, but just was expected to weaken the statistical significance of the ethnic differences in our results. This study is a cross-sectional study that has been under attack because it might be inappropriate for individual variability in age-related change (Raz and Lindenberger, 2011). However, longitudinal MRI studies also often have had limitations as relatively small numbers of subjects, short overall periods of follow-up, and/or small number of follow-up assessments (Salthouse, 2011; Schuster et al., 2015). The cross-sectional MRI studies have consistently revealed that increased age is associated with brain shrinkage, and have been supported by most of the longitudinal studies (Fjell et al., 2009a).
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database1.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chosun University Hospital, South Korea. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
YC conducted the imaging analysis and contributed to the preliminary draft writing. JL and KC conducted the statistical analysis. ES and IC interpreted the neuropsychological results. HK, M-KS, S-MC, SC, and BK interviewed and examined the subjects and reviewed the brain MRIs. BK and KL designed the study, wrote the manuscript, and provided the overall supervision for the project.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the volunteers and their families in the GARD cohort and ADNI studies. Some data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database1. Therefore, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Authorship_List.pdf.
Funding. This work was supported by the Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government, MSIT (NRF-2014M3C7A1046041 to KL and NRF-2016M3C7A1905472 to BK) and the Korea Brain Research Institute basic research program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (20-BR-03-02 to KL). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012) to ADNI. The funding details of ADNI can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/about/funding/.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00233/full#supplementary-material.
References
- Beals K. L., Smith C. L., Dodd S. M. (1984). Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Curr. Anthropol. 25, 301–330. 10.1086/203138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bonomini F., Filippini F., Hayek T., Aviram M., Keidar S., Rodella L. F., et al. (2010). Apolipoprotein E and its role in aging and survival. Exp. Gerontol. 45, 149–157. 10.1016/j.exger.2009.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chee M. W., Zheng H., Goh J. O., Park O., Sutton B. P. (2011). Brain structure in young and old East asians and Westerners: comparisons of structural volume and cortical thickness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 1065–1079. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dale A. M., Fischl B., Sereno M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9, 179–194. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damoiseaux J. S., Seeley W. W., Zhou J., Shirer W. R., Coppola G., Karydas A., et al. (2012). Gender modulates the APOE ε4 effect in healthy older adults: convergent evidence from functional brain connectivity and spinal fluid tau levels. J. Neurosci. 32, 8254–8262. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0305-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison A. C., Hinkley D. V. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Desikan R. S., Ségonne F., Fischl B., Quinn B. T., Dickerson B. C., Blacker D., et al. (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31, 968–980. 10.1016/j.NeuroImage.2006.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan J., Tse M., Carr J. S., Miller B. L., Kramer J. H., Rosen H. J., et al. (2019). Alzheimer disease-associated cortical atrophy does not differ between chinese and whites. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 33, 186–193. 10.1097/wad.0000000000000315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrer L. A., Cupples L. A., Haines J. L., Hyman B., Kukull W. A., Mayeux R., et al. (1997). Effects of age, sex and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer disease meta analysis consortium. JAMA 278, 1349–1356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Dale A. M. (2000). Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 97, 11050–11055. 10.1073/pnas.200033797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Liu A., Dale A. M. (2001). Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 70–80. 10.1109/42.906426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Salat D. H., Busa E., Albert M., Dieterich M., Haselgrove C., et al. (2002). Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Sereno M. I., Dale A. (1999a). Cortical surface-based analysis: ii: inflation, flattening and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9, 195–207. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Sereno M. I., Tootell R. B., Dale A. M. (1999b). High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 272–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischl B., Van Der Kouwe A., Destrieux C., Halgren E., Ségonne F., Salat D. H., et al. (2004). Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22. 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fjell A. M., Walhovd K. B., Fennema- Notestine C., Mcevoy L. K., Hagler D. J., Holland D., et al. (2009a). One-year brain atrophy evident in healthy aging. J. Neurosci. 29, 15223–15231. 10.1523/jneurosci.3252-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fjell A. M., Westlye L. T., Amlien I., Espeseth T., Reinvang I., Raz N., et al. (2009b). High consistency of regional cortical thinning in aging across multiple samples. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2001–2012. 10.1093/cercor/bhn232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., Mchugh P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox N. C., Schott J. M. (2004). Imaging cerebral atrophy: normal ageing to Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 363, 392–394. 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15441-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He W., Goodkind D., Kowal P. (2016). “An Aging World: 2015.” (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office; ). [Google Scholar]
- Howells W. W. (1990). Skull shapes and the Map: Craniometric analyses in the dispersion of mordern homo. Cambridge: Peabody Museum Press. [Google Scholar]
- Isamah N., Faison W., Payne M. E., MacFall J., Steffens D. C., Beyer J. L., et al. (2010). Variability in frontotemporal brain structure: the importance of recruitment of african americans in neuroscience research. PLoS One 5:e13642. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs E. G., Kroenke C., Lin J., Epel E. S., Kenna H. A., Blackburn E. H., et al. (2013). Accelerated cell aging in female APOE-ε4 carriers: implications for hormone therapy use. PLoS One 8:e54713. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jee Y. H., Lee S. J., Jung K. J., Jee S. H. (2016). Alcohol intake and serum glucose levels from the perspective of a mendelian randomization design: the KCPS-II biobank. PLoS One 11:e0162930. 10.1371/journal.pone.0162930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang Y., Jang S., Na D. L. (2012). Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Seoul: Human Brain Research and Consulting Co. [Google Scholar]
- Klein A., Tourville J. (2012). 101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front. Neurosci. 6:171. 10.3389/fnins.2012.00171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledig C., Schuh A., Guerrero R., Heckemann R. A., Rueckert D. (2018). Structural brain imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: biomarker analysis and shared morphometry database. Sci. Rep. 8:11258. 10.1038/s41598-018-29295-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43, 2412–2414. 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu S. C., Pa J., Kukull W., Beekly D., Kuzma A., Gangadharan P., et al. (2017). Apolipoprotein E genotype and sex risk factors for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 74, 1178–1189. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raber J., Wong D., Buttini M., Orth M., Bellosta S., Pitas R. E., et al. (1998). Isoform-specific effects of human apolipoprotein E on brain function revealed in ApoE knockout mice: increased susceptibility of females. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 95, 10914–10919. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raz N., Lindenberger U. (2011). Only time will tell: cross-sectional studies offer no solution to the age-brain-cognition triangle: comment on Salthouse. Psychol. Bull. 137, 790–795. 10.1037/a0024503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reinvang I., Espeseth T., Westlye L. T. (2013). APOE-related biomarker profiles in non-pathological aging and early phases of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1322–1335. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Resnick S. M., Pham D. L., Kraut M. A., Zonderman A. B., Davatzikos C. (2003). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. J. Neurosci. 23, 3295–3301. 10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03295.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rushton J. P. (2000). Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A life history perspective. 3rd edn. Porto Huron: Charles Darwin Research Institute Press. [Google Scholar]
- Salthouse T. A. (2011). Neuroanatomical substrates of age-related cognitive decline. Psychol. Bull. 137, 753–784. 10.1037/a0023262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders A. M., Strittmatter W. J., Schmechel D., George-Hyslop P. H. S., Pericak-Vance M. A., Joo S. H., et al. (1993). Association of apolipoprotein E allele ε4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 43, 1467–1472. 10.1212/wnl.43.8.1467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scahill R. I., Frost C., Jenkins R., Whitwell J. L., Rossor M. N., Fox N. C. (2003). A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch. Neurol. 60, 989–994. 10.1001/archneur.60.7.989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schippling S., Ostwaldt A.-C., Suppa P., Spies L., Manogaran P., Gocke C., et al. (2017). Global and regional annual brain volume loss rates in physiological aging. J. Neurol. 264, 520–528. 10.1007/s00415-016-8374-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuster C., Elamin M., Hardiman O., Bede P. (2015). Presymptomatic and longitudinal neuroimaging in neurodegeneration-from snapshots to motion picture: a systematic review. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 86, 1089–1096. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sepulcre J., Grothe M. J., D’oleire Uquillas F., Ortiz-Terán L., Diez I., Yang H.-S., et al. (2018). Neurogenetic contributions to amyloid β and τ spreading in the human cortex. Nat. Med. 24, 1910–1918. 10.1038/s41591-018-0206-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen X., Reus L. M., Cox S. R., Adams M. J., Liewald D. C., Bastin M. E., et al. (2017). Subcortical volume and white matter integrity abnormalities in major depressive disorder: findings from UK biobank imaging data. Sci. Rep. 7:5547. 10.1038/s41598-017-05507-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y., Yamada K., Liddelow S. A., Smith S. T., Zhao L., Luo W., et al. (2017). ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nature 549, 523–527. 10.1038/nature24016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sled J. G., Zijdenbos A. P., Evans A. C. (1998). A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 87–97. 10.1109/42.668698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sowell E. R., Peterson B. S., Thompson P. M., Welcome S. E., Henkenius A. L., Toga A. W. (2003). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 309–315. 10.1038/nn1008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang Y., Zhao L., Lou Y., Shi Y., Fang R., Lin S., et al. (2018). Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 2147–2155. 10.1002/hbm.23994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiner M. W., Veitch D. P., Aisen P. S., Beckett L. A., Cairns N. J., Cedarbaum J., et al. (2015). 2014 update of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 11, e1–120. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yaffe K. (2001). Estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators and dementia: what is the evidence? Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 949, 215–222. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb04024.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zilles K., Kawashima R., Dabringhaus A., Fukuda H., Schormann T. (2001). Hemispheric shape of European and Japanese brains: 3-D MRI analysis of intersubject variability, ethnical, and gender differences. NeuroImage 13, 262–271. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The GARD data that support the findings of this study are not openly available yet. Until we are ready to share the data publicly, the data could be available from the corresponding author (BK or KL), upon reasonable request.
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database1.