Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0236965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236965

Coverage of completion of four ANC visits based on recommended time schedule in Northern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study design

Mulu Ftwi 1,*, Gebremedhin Gebre-egziabher Gebretsadik 1, Haftu Berhe 2, Mebrahtom Haftu 2, Gebrehiwot Gebremariam 3, Yemane Berhane Tesfau 4
Editor: Sara Ornaghi5
PMCID: PMC7437465  PMID: 32810140

Abstract

Background

Despite decades of implementation of maternal health care programs, the uptake of antenatal care services based on the recommended gestational age continues to be below the national and regional targets. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors related to the completion of four antenatal care visits among mothers who gave birth 6 months preceding the study.

Method

We conducted a community-based cross-sectional study using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative component included administering a pre-tested structured questionnaire to 466 mothers who gave birth 6 months preceding the study using a simple random sampling technique from respective Tabias. The quantitative result was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was done to determine the association between independent and dependent variables. Variables were declared as statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 in multivariable logistic regression model. The qualitative interview data were collected from eight mothers and four key informants recruited through purposive sampling method.

Results

The overall prevalence of completion of four ANC visits based on the recommended time schedule was 9.9% (95% CI, 7.1–12.4). However, 63.9% of the participants attended four visits or more regardless of the recommended time schedule. Being member of community health insurance (AOR 2.140, 95% CI, 1.032–4.436), walking on foot less than or equal one hour to reach the health facility (AOR 3.921, 95% CI, 1.915–8.031), having workload at home (AOR 0.369, 95% CI, 0.182–0.751), and husband supported during antenatal care (AOR 2.561, 95% CI, 1.252–5.240) were independently associated with the completion of four ANC visits based on the recommended time schedule in multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

The completion of four ANC contacts based on the recommended time schedule remains low in rural areas of Northern Ethiopia. Being a member of community health insurance, distance to the health facility, workload, and male involvement were associated with the completion of four ANC visits based on the recommended time schedule. The existing health system should consider improving the recommended ANC visits by integrating Community based interventions.

Introduction

"According to WHO, Antenatal care (ANC) can be defined as the care provided by skilled health care providers to a woman from the beginning of pregnancy until the onset of labor It is a key entry point for pregnant women in order to receive a broad range of health promotion and preventive services, including screening for danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period [13].

In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that in low-income countries pregnant women without any complication should visit the health facility at least four times for ANC based on recommended schedules in their pregnancy period [3]. This was called Focused Antenatal care (FANC) model. The aim was to address evidence-based clinical interventions, counselling on maternal health, on birth and emergency preparedness [4]. Even though, it is reported that 83% of pregnant women received ANC at least once in their pregnancy period globally [5], some studies suggested that in low-income countries pregnant women often do not receive the recommended number of ANC visits [3]. For example, the report on sub-Saharan Africa pointed that 71% of pregnant women attend formal ANC at least once; however, only 44% attended ANC four or more times [5]. Similarly, a review of trends over the last two decades has shown high variability in the proportion of pregnant women making at least four ANC visits across the globe [6].

In 2016, the WHO reviewed the previous guideline, recommending at least eight ANC visits throughout the pregnancy as a means to decrease perinatal death and enhance maternal satisfaction, irrespective of the resource setting, compared to the FANC model. However, in the real world scenario, pregnant women are not even adhering to the FANC model. Thus, the first step could be trying to reach the four ANC visits goal.

In Ethiopia, though ANC services are provided in many places (community health post, health centres and hospitals), only 27% of rural women have four or more ANC visits [7]. In previous studies, level of education, ANC knowledge, service satisfaction, maternal age, parity and correct communication of pregnancy timing were found to be contributing factors for the completion of four ANC visits [8]. Women who have inadequate number ANC visits or start ANC later than the first trimester seem to have higher rates of poor pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight and pre-term birth. Besides, completing four ANC visits is pivotal in fostering, safe delivery, and postnatal care attendance among women in low-income countries [1]. Though information on completion of four ANC based on recommended time schedule is crucial, to our knowledge there is dearth of information so far in Northern Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and factors related to the completion of four ANC visit based on the recommended time schedule, in rural areas of Northern Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study area and period

The study was conducted in the Eastern zone, one of seven zones of Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia. Based on the 2007 Census, the total population of the zone was 850,000 with the annual expected number of deliveries estimated to be around 26,350 [9]. According to the 2007 (EFY) survey, the health service coverage in the eastern zone was approximately 85%. Eastern Zone has two general hospitals, five primary hospitals, 36 health centres, and 116 health posts [9]. The data were collected from March 9 to May 30, 2019, in the rural Eastern zone, Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia.

Study design

A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted. All mothers who gave birth within the six months preceding the data collection period were included in a quantitative study. In addition, Mothers who gave birth six months preceding the study period, midwife professionals, health extension workers, and Women’s Development Army Members were purposively selected. To complement the quantitative evidence, we collected qualitative data from mothers other than who participated in the quantitative study.

Source population

All mothers living in the Eastern Zone of rural Tigrai who gave birth six months preceding the study.

Study population

Mothers who gave birth six months preceding the study period in the selected “Tabia’s” of Eastern Zone of rural Tigrai region

Study subjects for quantitative study

Those mothers who gave birth six months preceding the survey and selected for interview in the selected “Tabias” of Eastern Zone.

Study subjects for qualitative study

Mothers, women who were members of the women’s development armed, Midwifes and Health extension workers that purposively selected for interview in the selected “Tabias” of Eastern Zone.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size for the quantitative study was determined by the single population proportion formula, using the proportion of the completion of four ANC visits in rural women (27%) [10]. Therefore the total sample size was calculated with the assumption of 0.05 marginal errors and 95% confidence interval. Based on these assumptions, the sample size was estimated at 303. After considering 1.5 design effects and adding 5% for non-respondents the final sample size was taken as 477. Out of the seven woredas in the rural Eastern zone of Tigrai, three woredas were selected randomly and twenty-one “Tabias” were selected from the three woreda using simple random sampling to recruit the study participants. Finally, participants were selected using simple random sampling from the registration books for women who gave birth 6 months preceding the study in the selected “Tabias”. For the qualitative part, eight mothers in the in-depth interview and four key informant interviews from women development group and health extension workers were involved. The number of participants and time spent was determined based on the data saturation level.

Operational definition

Completion of four ANC visits: Mothers were considered compliant when they attended four ANC visits based on the WHO recommended ANC schedules (1st visit at less than 16 weeks of gestational age, 2nd visit between 24th -28th week gestation, 3rd visit between 30th-32nd weeks gestation, and 4th visit at 36th week gestation or later) [11].

Components of ANC services: We conducted a composite score by giving minimum value of zero and maximum value one for each item. The component of ANC service was dichotomized as "yes" when participants scored above mean score value. Moreover, was categorized as "no" when participants scored below mean score value [4, 12, 13].

Data collection procedures and tools

Quantitative study

The data were collected using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. It was prepared in English and translated in to local language (Tigrigna) and then translated back to English to check its consistency by language experts. Twelve data collectors and four supervisors were recruited for the data collection.

Qualitative approach

The interviews were conducted using an open-ended interview guide by the principal investigator. The data were also recorded digitally.

Data processing & analysis

Quantitative

After each questionnaire was checked for its completeness and consistency, data were coded and entered into SPSS™ version 22 for analysis purposes. Frequency tabulations were performed to analyse the distribution of factors among the women included in this study. Bivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the crude odds ratio (OR) between each of the factors and the completion of four antenatal visits. In the bivariate analysis model, each variable with p<0.2 was considered as a significant variable and included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Each variable with p ≤ 0.05 was considered as a significant variable in the final model. Multi-colinearity was checked among the independent variables using the variance inflation factor and the value was VIF = 1.086. The necessary assumption of model fitness during logistic regression was checked using the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test statistics and the value was p = 0.410. Measures of association were calculated using adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval. Finally, variables p-value less than 5% of the adjusted odds ratio were declared as significant and presented using tables, graphs, and text.

Qualitative approach

The qualitative component of the research were analysed after the analysis of the quantitative data. The interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed verbatim into the local language, and then translated into English by language experts, subsequently analyzed thematically using Atlas Ti™ version 7. Finally, barriers related to categories like the accessibility of transport, household workload, and distance from home to health facilities, as well as facilitator related categories such as health insurance and husband’s involvement were identified.

Ultimately, the quantitative and qualitative data were triangulated at the results and discussion to improve the validity as well as to complement the quantitative findings.

Data quality assurance

Data collectors, along with the supervisors, were trained regarding the purpose of the study, data collection procedures, study tools, and handling of collecting data. During the data collection period, close supervision was made daily by the supervisors.

Ethical consideration

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the College of Health Sciences at Mekelle University (ERC 1258/2019). Written permission was taken from the Tigrai Regional Health Bureau and from the respective district administrations. Verbal permission was considered from “Tabia” administrators for facilitating the data collection. Besides, consent was secured from the respondents after explaining the purpose of the data collection. All information obtained from the participants was strictly kept confidential and were only being used for the purpose of the research.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of respondents

A total of 466 mothers participated in this study with a response rate of 97.7%. The median age of participants were 27 years (±12) and an interquartile range of 22 to 34 years. Most of the study participants (n = 423, 90.8%) were Christian Orthodox. Majority, (n = 366, 78.5%) of the mothers were married and around two third of families earned (n = 385, 82.65%) with two thirds earning less than $54 USD per month. Of the study participants, 264 (56.7%) walked more than 1hr on foot to reach the health facility (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of delivered mothers in the eastern zone of rural Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia 2019 (n = 466).

Variables Category Frequency (%) Four ANC completion
Yes No
Maternal age <20 74 (15.9) 3 (4.05%) 71 (95.94%)
20–34 286 (61.4) 30 (10.5% 256 (89.5%)
35–49 106 (22.7) 13 (12.2%) 93 (87.7%)
Maternal occupation Housewife 385 (82.6) 46 (11.9%) 339 (88%)
Employed* 81 (17.4) 0 (0%) 81 (100%)
Maternal education No formal education 138 (29.7) 6 (4.3%) 132 (95.7%)
Elementary school 161(34.5) 19 (11.3%) 142 (88.6%)
Secondary school & above 167(35.8) 21(13%) 146 (86.9%)
Paternal level of education No formal education 100 (21.5) 6 (9%) 94 (91%)
Elementary School 164 (35.2) 18(10.97%) 146 (89%)
Secondary school & above 202 (43.3) 19 (9.4%) 183 (90.5%)
Marital status Married 366 (78.5) 40 (10.9%) 326 (89%)
Unmarried 36 (7.7) 3 (8.3%) 33 (91.6%)
Divorced 18 (3.9) 1 (5.5%) 17 (94.4%)
Widowed 14 (93.0) 0 (0%) 14 (100%)
Separated 32 (6.9) 2 (6.25%) 30 (93.75%)
Distance from home to health care >1hrwalk 264 (56.7) 14 (5.3%) 250 (94.7%)
≤1hr walk 202 (43.3) 32 (15.8%) 170 (84.2%)
Household size <5 242 (51.9) 18 (7.4%) 224 (92.5%)
≥5 224 (48.1) 28 (12.5%) 196 (87.5%)
Family monthly income (USD) <54 307 (65.9) 25 (8.14%) 282 (91.8%)
54–107 90 (19.3) 12 (13.3%) 78 (86.6%)
>107 69 (14.8) 9 (13%) 60 (86.9%)

*Employed = private or governmental employed

Obstetric history of study participants in the eastern zone of Tigrai region

Out of the total respondents, 257 (55.2%) were Para one and two. Above half, 250 (53.6%) of mothers give their first birth after their 20 years old. Regarding participants’ birth intervals, 154 (49%) of the participants' current child was at a 3–5 year interval of their previous child. The majority (76.2%) of respondents reported their recent pregnancy was planned (Table 2).

Table 2. Obstetric history among delivered mothers in the eastern zone of rural Tigrai Northern Ethiopia 2019.

Variable Frequency Four ANC completion
Category (N, %) Yes No
Parity (n = 466) 1–2 257 (55.2) 25 (9.7%) 232 (90.7%)
3–4 114 (24.5) 9 (7.9%) 105 (92. %)
≥5 95 (20.4) 12 (12.6%) 83 (87.4%)
Age at first pregnancy (n = 466) Under 20 216 (46.4) 20 (9.25%) 196 (90.7%)
≥ 20 250 (53.6) 26 (10.4%) 224 (89.6%)
Birth interval (n = 314) <3 yr 95 (30.3) 10 (10.5%) 85 (89.4%)
3–5 yr 154 (49.0) 20 (13%) 134 (87.5%)
>5 yr 65 (20.7) 6 (9.2%) 59 (90.7%)
Planned pregnancy (n = 466) Yes 355 (76.2) 38 (10.7%) 317 (89.3%)
No 111 (23.8) 8 (7.2%) 103 (92.7%)
Complication history (N = 466) Yes 53 (11.4) 6 (11.3) 47 (88.7%)
No 413 (88.6) 40 (9.68%) 373 (90.3%)

Source of information about ANC visit

Regarding to information about ANC visit, 465 (99.8%) of the respondent had an access to information. Majority of the mothers’ source of information 368 (79%) were, from Health Extension Workers (Table 3).

Table 3. Source of information about delivered mothers about ANC visits in eastern zone of rural Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia 2019 (N = 466).

Variable Category Frequency (%) Four ANC completion
Yes No
Ever heard about the ANC Yes 465 (99.8) 46 (9.9%) 419 (90.1%)
No 1 (.2) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
Source of information
Husband Yes 87 (18.7) 11 (12.6%) 76 (87.3%)
No 379 (81.3) 35 (9.23%) 344 (90.7%)
Family member Yes 121 (26.0) 13 (10.7%) 108 (89.2%)
No 345 (74.0) 33 (9.56%) 312 (90.4%)
Health extension worker Yes 368 (79.0) 39 (10.6%) 329 (89.4%)
No 98 (21.0) 7 (7.1%) 91 (92.8%)
Midwife or Nurse, Health officer or Doctor Yes 255 (54.7) 23 (9%) 232 (91%)
No 211 (45.3) 23 (10.9%) 188 (89%)
Religious leader Yes 13 (2.8) 0 (0%) 13 (100%)
No 453 (97.2) 46 (10.1%) 407 (89.8%)
TV or Radio Yes 158 (33.9) 20 (12.6%) 138 (87.3%)
No 308 (66.1) 26 (8.44%) 282 (91.5%)
Newspaper Yes 34 (7.3) 0 (0%) 34 (100%)
No 432 (92.7) 46 (10.6%) 386 (89.3%)
Others source of information Yes 67 (14.4) 3 (4.5%) 64 (95.5%)
No 399 (85.6) 43 (10.7%) 356 (89.2%)

Uptake of antenatal care visits

The overall ANC attendance for at least one visit was found to be 98.1%. Of 298 (63.9%) mothers attended four and above ANC visits regardless of the recommended time schedule. Three hundred seventy-six (80.7%) of them were attended at health centres. Regarding the time of visits, 228 (48.9%) attended their first visit before 16 weeks of gestational age, 257 (58.4%) attended their second visits in between 24–28 weeks of gestational age, 178 (42.2%) attended their third visits from 30–32 weeks of gestational age, and 171 (58.%) completed their fourth visit after 36 weeks gestation. The overall prevalence of completion of four ANC visits based on the recommended schedule in our study was 9.9% (Table 4).

Table 4. ANC visit status by gestational age among delivered mothers in eastern zone of rural Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia, 2019.

Variables Category (Yes/No) Frequency (%) Completion of four ANC visits
Yes No
Have you attended ANC for recent pregnancy (n = 466) Yes 457 (98.1) 46(10.06%) 411(89.9%)
No 9 (1.9) 0(0%) 9(100%)
No of ANC visits (n = 457) Once 18 (3.9) 0(0%) 18 (100%)
2–3 times 141 (30.9) 0(0%) 141(100%)
≥4 298 (63.9) 46(15.4%) 252(84.5%)
GA at first visit (n = 457) ≥16 weeks 238 (51.1) 0(0%) 238(100%)
<16 weeks 228 (48.9) 46(20.1%) 182(79.8%)
GA at second visits (n = 440) <23 weeks 121 (27.5) 4(3.3) 58(96.7)
24–28 weeks 257 (58.4) 28(10.8%) 229(89.1)
≥29 weeks 62 (14.1) 13(20.6%) 108(79.03%)
GA at third visits (n = 422) <29 weeks 163 (38.6) 6(3.68%) 75(96.3%)
30–32 weeks 178 (42.2) 18(10.1%) 160(89.8%)
>32 weeks 81 (19.2) 21(25.9%) 142(74%)
GA at the fourth visits (295) <36 weeks 124 (42.0) 16(12.9%) 155(87%)
≥36 weeks 171 (58.0) 18(10.5%) 106(89.4%)
Completion of four ANC visit based on recommended time No 420(90.1)
Yes 46(9.9)

*GA: gestational age.

Community participation related variables

In our study, 251 (53.9%) of mothers were getting support from their husbands to attend the ANC visits. Two hundred forty two (51.9%) of study participants reported having health insurance. However, 191 (41%) of mothers attended pregnant women’s forum (Table 5).

Table 5. Community participation related variables of delivered mothers in the eastern zone of rural Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia, 2019 (N = 466).
Variable Category (Yes/No) Frequency (%) Four ANC completion
Yes No
Husband’s support for ANC visits Yes 251 (53.9) 33 (13.1%) 218 (86.8%)
No 215 (46.1) 13 (6%) 202 (94%)
Mother’s workload at home Yes 228 (48.9) 14 (6.1%) 214 (93.8%)
No 238 (51.1) 32 (13.4%) 206 (86.5%)
Member of women development group No 179 (38.4) 17 (9.49%) 162 (90.5%)
Yes 287 (61.6) 29 (10.%) 258 (90%)
Member of health insurance Yes 242 (51.9) 33 (13.6%) 209 (86.3)
No 224 (48.1) 13 (5.8%) 211 (94.1%)
Model family Yes 126 (27.0) 10 (7.93%) 116 (92%)
No 340 (73.0) 36 (10.6%) 304 (89.4%)
Pregnant women forum Yes 191 (41.0) 22 (11.5%) 169 (88.5%)
No 275 (59.0) 24 (8.72%) 251 (91.2%)

The components of ANC service given in the health facility

Based on literatures [4], we used nine components of ANC service to assess the compliance. In this study, majority 288 (61.8%) of mothers were received five and more than five components of the ANC service during their visits. Majority of 296 (63.5%) mothers were waiting for 30 and above minutes to receive for the ANC in the health facility. Around 163 (35%) of mother were not satisfied by the ANC service in the health facility (Table 6).

Table 6. The components of ANC service among delivered mothers in the eastern zone of rural Tigrai Northern Ethiopia, 2019.

Variables Categories Frequency Precent
Give you iron tablet Yes 366 75.4
No 100 24.6
Take blood sample Yes 373 80
No 93 20
Take urine sample Yes 368 79
No 98 21
Counseling and HIV testing Yes 390 83.7
No 76 16.3
Counseling about nutrition Yes 361 77.4
No 105 22.6
Counseling about birth preparedness Yes 338 72.1
No 128 27.9
Counseling to complete four visits Yes 343 73.6
No 123 26.4
Waiting in the health facility <30 minutes 170 36.5
> = 30 minutes 296 63.5
Satisfied by the service Yes 303 65
No 163 35

Factors affecting the completion of four ANC visit

In this study, the distance from home to the health facility, husband’s support during ANC visits, the workload at home, and health insurance membership were found significantly associated with the completion of four ANC visits in multivariable analysis.

Women who had health insurance were 2.1 times more likely to complete four ANC visits as compared to non-insured women (AOR = 2.117, 95% CI:1.031–4.346) (Table 7). This finding was supplemented qualitatively: A male midwife with six years’ works experience mentioned

Table 7. Factors affecting of participant with the completion of four ANC visit in the eastern zone of rural Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia, 2019.

Variables Category ANC completion COR(95% CI) AOR(95% CI)
Yes (n = 46) No (n = 420)
Age of mother <20 years 3 (6.5%) 71 (16.9%) 1 1
20-34yrs 30 (65.2%) 256 (61%) 2.773 (0.822–9.353) 2.414 (0.689–8.460)
35-49yrs 13 (28.3%) 93 (22.1%) 3.308 (0.908–12.05) 3.366 (0.862–13.14)
Monthly income of the family <1500 25 (54.3%) 282 (67.1%) 1 1
1500–3000 12 (26.1%) 78 (18.6%) 1.735 (0.834–3.610 1.826 (0.821–4.062)
>3000 9 (19.6%) 60 (14.3%) 1.692 (0.752–3.808) 1.689 (0.698–4.092)
Distance home to the health facility >1hr Walk 14 (30.4%) 250 (59.5%) 1 1
< = 1hr Walk 32 (69.6%) 170 (40.5%) 3.361 (1.74–6.48) 3.94 (1.95–7.94)***
Mass media as us source of information Yes 20 (43.5%) 138 (32.9%) 1.572 (0.848–2.915) 1.18 (0.592–2.350)
No 26 (56.5%) 282 (67.1%) 1 1

Husband’s support during ANC
Yes 33 (71.7%) 218 (51.9%) 2.352 (1.204–4.595) 2.56 (1.25–5.216)**
No 13 (28.3%) 202 (48.1%) 1 1
Workload at home Yes 14 (30.4%) 214 (51.9%) 0.421 (0.218–0.18) 0.375 (.186-.755)**
No 32 (69.6%) 206 (49%) 1 1
Member of health insurance Yes 33 (71.7% 209 (49.8%) 2.563 (1.312–5.007) 2.117 (1.031–4.346)*
No 13 (28.3%) 211 (50.2%) 1 1
Components of ANC services Yes 33 (71.7%) 255 (60.7%) 1.643 (0.840–3.213) 1.766 (0.857–3.640)
No 13 (28.3%) 165 (39.3) 1 1

*Significant at p<0.05

** significant at p<0.01

*** significant at p<0.00.

Since, those mothers who are a member of the health insurance, easily adapted the health facility’s environment, they are frequently visit our hospital for ANC service compared to the mothers who are not. Not only during pregnancy, but also they receive services when they feel something immediately since no need of paying of pocket” at each service (KII, 4).

Mothers walking on foot less than one hour to reach the nearest health facility were 3.9 times more likely complete ANC visits as compared to those who walked more than one hour (AOR = 3.939, 95% CI:1.953–7.943). This finding was also supported by all of the participants in the qualitative study. A mother said that distance could be a main reason for attending the ANC visit on time. For example, the distance from my house to the health facility takes around two hours on foot; so many women, including me, are not visiting the health facility on time (IDI, P5).

Mothers who were supported by their husbands during ANC visits were 2.6 times more likely to complete the fourth ANC visit at the recommended time as compared to women who had not supported by their husbands (AOR = 2.556, 95% CI: 1.309–5.552).

From the qualitative study, a Para 1, 22 year old mother stated

Except few educated husbands most of them especially, in the rural area, do not know the importance of the ANC for the foetus and the mother. So, these educated husbands share workloads, give money for transport, support their wife to visit a health facility for ANC (IDI, 6).

The odds of four ANC visit completion on mothers who had workload at home decreased by 62% compared to those who had no workload at home (AOR 0.375, 95% CI: 0.186–0.755) (Table 7). This result was also supplemented by the qualitative result: One health care provider mentioned that

in our setting, females work equally with the males. Especially in the summer season, women participate in ploughing, weed, mowing collecting of grain, keeping of cattle, and preparing of food; this makes the pregnant mother too busy to come to our health facility for an ANC visit (KII, 4)

Discussion

We conducted a study on the prevalence and factors related to the completion of four ANC visits among women in a rural Northern Ethiopia. The prevalence of completion of four ANC visits was 9.9% (95% CI: 7.1–12.4). However, 63.9% attended four visits or more regardless the recommended time schedule. Distance from home to the health facility, husband’s support for the ANC, workload at home, and being membership in a health insurance were determinants of completion of four ANC visits.

The WHO’s ANC model recommends pregnant women should attend ANC with a minimum of four visits within the recommended gestational age [11].

Even though there is dearth of information about the prevalence of completion of four ANC visit based on the recommended time schedule, a single study conducted using DHS data in sub-Saharan Africa, Middle east, Asia, Latin America and Caribbean countries shows 14.9%-38.6%, 80.5%-89.0%, 44.0% -78.9%, and 54.4%-76.1% respectively [14]. This indicates that our finding is low compared to the aforementioned study. The reason might be the completion of the four ANC visit based on the recommended time schedule only consider at the first ANC visit, but there is no clear statement that shows either the remaining visits were based on the recommended time schedule or not. Besides, sample size difference might also a reason. Current studies in rural Tigrai also showed that Health Extension Workers are committed in providing ANC services at home [15]. Because of this mothers might become reluctant to the recommended schedule. In this study, 298 (63.9) % mothers visited four times and above for ANC service regardless of the recommended time schedule. This finding is similar to the annual report of Tigrai Regional health bureau (65%) and mini EDHS 2019 (63.9%) [16], however, slightly lower than a study conducted in Jimma town (77.9%) [17] and Dembecha (80%) [18]. This difference might be due to the fact that urban women are more accessible to health services than rural women. The finding of this study is higher than studies conducted in other parts of Ethiopia [19]. In this survey, regardless of the time schedule visit, there is higher ANC utilization. This might be, because, the Ethiopian ministry of health introduced the four ANC services indicators in the maternal health program so as to improve the number of visits and it indicates an improvement on the awareness of maternal and child health care services. In addition, the study area could be a reason for the different result. Similarly this result is higher than findings reported elsewhere in African countries [4, 20]. The possible reason could be due to time difference.

An estimated 49% of women had delayed first ANC visits in this study. This estimate reflects under-utilization of ANC and this could possibly contribute to high maternal mortality. This prevalence of late booking is lower than study conducted in Central Tigrai (85.6%) [21]. The difference was due to study area and the definition given for late booking. Our result was also lower than study conducted in studies conducted elsewhere in rural Ethiopia [19, 22]. This implies that a significant proportion of pregnant women did not initiate ANC visits at the recommended gestational age. In Ethiopia, ANC coverage increased from 34% in 2011 to 62% in 2016 [22]. This shift indicates the government is committed towards increasing the coverage but focus was not given to the timing of ANC. So, raising the ANC coverage only may not be adequate for the pregnant women who require the capacities and knowledge to utilize the service at the optimal time of gestational age. The first visit offers an opportunity to establish baseline information on the general well-being of the mother and the fetus.

Our study found that mothers who walk less than one hour to the nearest facility were 3.9 times more likely to complete four ANC visits than those who walk more than one hour. Studies conducted in Southern and South Western Ethiopia have reported similar findings [19, 23, 24]. This is because distance is considered the major factor that hinders service utilization, even though, other factors affect service utilization because, service utilization could also depend on the behaviour of the individuals [15]. It is the fact that accessibility of a health facility is the main barrier for maternal health service including ANC, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, where Ethiopia is located [25].

Similarly, mothers who were supported by their husbands were 2.56 times more likely to complete four ANC visits. A similar finding was reported in Yem special woreda, [19] and Nigeria [26]. Besides, a systematic review and meta-analysis from low- and middle-income countries reported that male involvement in antenatal care had a positive impact on the uptake of maternal health [27]. Participants from qualitative component of this study also mentioned if the husband shared money and ideas with his wife during ANC service, the mothers experienced freedoms and fully enjoyed the ANC opportunities. Because, a husband has contributed significantly to women’s decision to use reproductive health services, male involvement has a crucial contribution in enhancing the maternal and neonatal health service including ANC [28].

On the other hand, mothers who had a workload at home were 62% less likely to complete four visits than those mothers who had no workload at home. This finding could be because, pregnant mothers might give priorities to other routine activities like ploughing, mowing, keeping of cattle, preparing food and caring for the children, making timely visits for ANC service more difficult.

Mothers who had a membership in a community health insurance were 2.1 times more likely to complete the four ANC visits. This evidence was in line with a studies done in Nigeria [29], Manzi [30], and Ghana [31]. The possible explanation could be that even though ANC service is cost-free in Ethiopia, the health insurance increases the healthcare-seeking behaviour since it does not require any out of pocket payment and this idea also supported by the participants in the qualitative study. Evidences in rural Tigrai also showed that being member of community health insurance was associated with increased maternal service utilization [32]. Findings from Ghana, Indonesia and Rwanda reported that, community based health insurance have positive effect on the enhancement of the maternal health care utilization including ANC visit based on the WHO recommended time schedule [33].

Limitation of the study

Recall bias might be present in the mother regarding the specific weeks of gestational age and ANC visits. Our participants did not exclude mothers who had a previous history of pregnancy complications. Since we collected the data directly from the mothers, social desirability bias is possible.

Conclusion and recommendation

Our findings show that the completion of four ANC visit based on the recommended time schedule remains low. Husband’s involvement during ANC, and being a member of community health insurance, distance from home to health facilities and workload at home were variables associated with the completion of four ANC visit based on the recommended time schedule. The existing health system should consider improving the recommended ANC visit by integrating Community based interventions. Health policies should be strengthening partner involvement, especially in maternal health programs.

The Ethiopian government has worked a lot on the number of ANC visits regardless of the gestational age, but this is not a guarantee for increasing the maternal and neonatal health.

This is the first study that evaluates ANC visits in the context of the correct gestational age. The methods could be reproduced in other low-income countries settings or other places in Ethiopia.

Supporting information

S1 File. Dataset of the prevalence and factors related to the completion of four ANC visit using a community based cross-sectional.

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

We strongly acknowledge Eastern Zone of Tigrai Health and Administrative Offices for their continuous support during data collection. Our thanks goes to professor Pammla Petrucka for the grammatically edited of the manuscript. Finally, we are also grateful to the data collectors, supervisors and all study participants who participated in the study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

We are very grateful to Mekelle University for providing financial support for this study. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chimatiro CS, et al. Understanding barriers preventing pregnant women from starting antenatal clinic in the first trimester of pregnancy in Ntcheu District-Malawi. Reproductive health,. 2018;15(1):158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Magoma M, et al. High ANC coverage and low skilled attendance in a rural Tanzanian district: a case for implementing a birth plan intervention. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010;10(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abou-Zahr, C.L, T.M, Wardlaw, WHO. Antenatal care in developing countries: promises, achievements and missed opportunities: an analysis of trends, levels and differentials. 1990–2001. 2003.
  • 4.Gupta S, Yamada G, Mpembeni R, Frumence G, Callaghan-Koru JA, Stevenson R, et al. Factors associated with four or more antenatal care visits and its decline among pregnant women in Tanzania between 1999 and 2010. PloS one. 2014;9(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kinney MV, Kerber KJ, Black RE, Cohen B, Nkrumah F, Coovadia H, et al. Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: where and why do they die? PLoS medicine. 2010;7(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang W. Levels and trends in the use of maternal health services in developing countries: ICF Macro; 2011.
  • 7.Demographic E. Health survey: Addis Ababa. Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: central statistics agency and ORC macro. 2011;2011.
  • 8.Pell C, Meñaca A, Were F, Afrah NA, Chatio S, Manda-Taylor L, et al. Factors affecting antenatal care attendance: results from qualitative studies in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi. PloS one. 2013;8(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tigray Regional Health Bureau Ten Years Health Bulletin. (EFY 1998–2007)
  • 10.ICF CSACEa. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF2016.
  • 11.Organization WH. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: World Health Organization; 2016. [PubMed]
  • 12.Muchie KF. Quality of antenatal care services and completion of four or more antenatal care visits in Ethiopia: a finding based on a demographic and health survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–7. 10.1186/s12884-016-1183-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Islam MM, Masud MS. Determinants of frequency and contents of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh: Assessing the extent of compliance with the WHO recommendations. PloS one. 2018;13(9):e0204752 10.1371/journal.pone.0204752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Benova L, Tunçalp Ö, Moran AC, Campbell OMR. Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ global health. 2018;3(2):e000779 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nsibu CN, Manianga C, Kapanga S, Mona E, Pululu P, Aloni MN. Determinants of antenatal care attendance among pregnant women living in endemic malaria settings: experience from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Obstetrics and gynecology international. 2016;2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.SA C. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019. Indicators. In: Program TD, ICF Rockville M, USA, editors: Central Statistical Agency Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2019
  • 17.Abagero B, Teshome MS, Abate KH. Magnitude and predictors of antenatal care (ANC) completion among mothers attending delivery and post-natal service in Jimma town, Oromia Region, South West Ethiopia. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2017;9(9):251–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gedefaw M, Muche B, Aychiluhem M. Current status of antenatal care utilization in the context of data conflict: the case of Dembecha District, Northwest Ethiopia. Open Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;4(04):208. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tewodros B, G/Mariam A, Dibaba Y. Factors affecting antenatal care utilization in Yem Special Woreda,South Western Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2009;19(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chorongo Dorah, et al. Factors influencing the utilization of focused antenatal care services in Malindi and Magarinisub-counties of Kilifcounty, Kenya. The Pan African Medical Journal 2016;25(2):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grum T, Brhane E. Magnitude and factors associated with late antenatal care booking on first visit among pregnant women in public health centers in central zone of Tigray Region, Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. PloS one. 2018;13(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.ICF C. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF. DF-1.6.
  • 23.Aliy J, Mariam DH. Determinants of equity in utilization of maternal health services in Butajira, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2012;26(1):265–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jira C, Belachew T. Determinants of antenatal care utilization in Jimma Town, SouthWest Ethiopia. Ethiopian journal of health Sciences. 2005;15(1):0–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fisseha G, Berhane Y, Worku A, Terefe W. Distance from health facility and mothers’ perception of quality related to skilled delivery service utilization in northern Ethiopia. International journal of women's health. 2017;9:749 10.2147/IJWH.S140366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Falade-Fatila O, Adebayo AM. Male partners’ involvement in pregnancy related care among married men in Ibadan, Nigeria. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(1):14 10.1186/s12978-020-0850-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suandi D, Williams P, Bhattacharya S. Does involving male partners in antenatal care improve healthcare utilisation? Systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature from low-and middle-income countries. International health. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS, Vlassoff M. Adding It Up: The costs and Benefits of Investing in family Planning and maternal and new born health. Guttmacher Institute; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aliyu AA, Dahiru T. Predictors of delayed Antenatal Care (ANC) visits in Nigeria: secondary analysis of 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). The Pan African medical journal. 2017;26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manzi A, Munyaneza F, Mujawase F, Banamwana L, Sayinzoga F, Thomson DR, et al. Assessing predictors of delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: a secondary analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arthur E. Wealth and antenatal care use: implications for maternal health care utilisation in Ghana. Health economics review. 2012;2(1):14 10.1186/2191-1991-2-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tesfau YB, Kahsay AB, Gebrehiwot TG, Medhanyie AA, Godefay H. Postnatal home visits by health extension workers in rural areas of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang W, Temsah G, Mallick L. The impact of health insurance on maternal health care utilization: evidence from Ghana, Indonesia and Rwanda. Health Policy and Planning. 2017;32(3):366–75. 10.1093/heapol/czw135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Sara Ornaghi

25 May 2020

PONE-D-20-10078

Prevalence and factors related to the completion of four antenatal care visits among mothers who gave birth 6 months preceding the study in the rural eastern zone of Tigrai, Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Beraki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 09 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sara Ornaghi, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please update both your Methods section and Ethics Statement to state whether informed participant consent was given, or a statement declaring that the institutional ethics board waived the need for consent. Please state what type of consent was given, i.e. written, verbal, etc.

3. We note that you have uploaded two tables both labelled table 6.  Please can you re-number your tables so that only one table is table 6. Please also ensure that you refer the renumbered Tables in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors sought to perform a report on antenatal care completion in a rural area of Ethiopia. The study is well conducted, I would suggest the following revisions.

Abstract

- Page 1, line 30: In the section "results", I would add this concept after the first sentence: "63.9% attended four visits or more regardless the recommended time schedule".

- Page 1 line 37: Please correct the syntax: In summary, only one of ten women attended the four ANC contacts at the recommended gestational age. Being a member of health insurance, distance to the health facility, workload and male support were associated with the completion of four ANC visits.

- in the Keywords, I would substitute "recommended" with "recommended gestational age"

Introduction

I re-wrote the introduction from line 41 to 71, mainly for syntax and word choices.

"According to WHO, Antenatal Care (ANC) can be defined as the care provided by skilled health care providers to a woman from the beginning of pregnancy until the onset of labor (1). It is a key entry point for pregnant women in order to receive a broad range of health promotion and preventive services, including screening for complications during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum period (2).

In 2003 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that, in low-income countries, pregnant women without any complication should visit the health facility at least four times based on recommended schedules in their pregnancy period (3). This was called Focused Antenatal care (FANC) model.

The aim was to address evidence-based clinical interventions, counseling on maternal health, on birth and emergency management (4). Even though, globally, it is reported that 83% of pregnant women received ANC at least once in their pregnancy period (5), some studies suggested that in low-income countries settings pregnant women often do not receive the recommended number of ANC visits (3). For example, the report on Sub Saharan Africa pointed that 71% of pregnant women attended formal ANC at least once; however, only 44% attended ANC four or more times (5).

Similarly, a review of trends over the last two decades has shown high variability in the proportion of pregnant women making at least four ANC visits across the globe (6).

In 2016, the WHO reviewed the previous guideline, recommending at least eight ANC visits throughout the pregnancy as a means to decrease perinatal death and enhance maternal satisfaction, irrespective of the resource setting, compared to the FANC model. However, in the real world scenario, pregnant women are not even adhering to the FANC model. Thus, the first step could be trying to reach the four ANC visits goal.

In Ethiopia, although ANC services are provided in many places (community health post, health centers and hospitals), only 27% of rural women have four or more ANC visits (8). In previous studies, level of education, ANC knowledge, service satisfaction, maternal age, parity and correct communication of pregnancy timing were found to be contributing factors for the completion of four ANC visits (9). Women who have inadequate number of ANC visits or start ANC later than the first trimester seem to have higher rates of poor pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight and preterm birth. Completing four ANC visits is pivotal in fostering early (first trimester) involvement, safe delivery and postnatal care attendance among women in low-income countries (1)."

Study design

Page 2, Line 95: I would explain what is "social desirability bias". I think it is not obvious for an audience of obstetrics and gynecologists, maybe more easy to understand for psychologists.

Results

- Page 5, lines 175-177: please write n=423, 90.8%, n=443, 95.1% and n=366, 78.5%.

- Page 5, table 1: what does it mean "Maternal occupation: employed"? What type of job? Please specify.

- Page 9 table 5: how did you define the dichotomic variable: "mother's workload at home"? Please specify also here (it is better explained at page 11 lines 262-266).

Discussion

- I was impressed by this concept: the prevalence of women attending the four ANC visits at recommended gestational age (GA) is 9.9%. However, 63.9% attended four visits or more regardless the recommended time schedule. At a first glance one might think that the main issue is attending visits, regardless the GA. But then, I focused on the fact that the majority of population attends four visits, but the issue is the correct timing. Maybe health care providers should stress during the first visit the importance of the correct timing of obstetrical checks. I would relate this to two important variables in Table 6: 26.4% did not receive counseling about completing four visits and 63.5% waited more than 30 minutes in the health facility. I argue that an improvement of these two components of ANC services could lead to better adhesion to 4 ANC visits. Please expand on this.

- Page 12, Line 279- 283: remove these sentences.

- Page 12 line 284 "compared to the study performed in Jimma Town"

- Page 12, line 286: " This might be due to the difference..."

- page 13 line 301: what do you mean with the term "utilization"?

- Page 13 line 310: an estimated 49% of women who had delayed first ANC visits

- Page 14 line 316: Our result was also lower than...

- Page 14 lines 318-319 : did not initiate, please remove "were" and choose between "by" or "at"

- Page 14 line 343: this idea

Conclusions

- Page 15 line 346: what do you mean with "plus"?

- Page 15 line 352: I would substitute "reducing" with " increasing" and remove lines 353 and 354 because you have already expressed this concept.

Please also remove lines 360/361

- Page 15 lines 363-367: please rewrite: " This is the first study that evaluates ANC visits in the context of the correct gestational age. The methods could be reproduced in other low-income countries settings or other places in Ethiopia".

Limitations

Please remove lines 369-370: you already explained this concept.

Reviewer #2: Dear authors, I would like to thank for your concern on maternal health care service utilization .Your manuscript need major revision especially on grammatical arrangement through out the manuscript.Beside this ,the discussion part is not well organized ,coherent and well sounded. See all the comments bellow :

1. Line -37-40-the abstract session doesn’t show recommendation

2. Line 48 –new sentence should be started with capital letter after punctuation .

3. Line 66- ‘ health provider knowledge for early pregnancy months’ is not clear ,how could be measure it ?

4. Line 67-71

5. Line 76-

6. Line 80- “quantitative and descriptive qualitative approach methods…. “ is there such type of study design ? try to correct it…

7. Line95 –remove the following phrases ….‘for inclusion ‘ and complete social desirability as social desirability biases

8. Line 101 what is tabia ?is it kebele or Gotte?,you need to operationalize it or describe on the method part

9. Line 119 and 128-131 have certain grammatical error .

10. Line 164,replace the word ‘ethics ‘with that of ethical’

11. Line174 needs measurement ,

12. Line 176-180 -most of the figures listed on the table are repeated on the text .so , make it precise .

13. Line 181-try to correct the heading of table 1 .Study subjects were those mothers who already gave birth 6 month prior to the study .but you considered as t says delivering mother .So, see it again including other tables and figures accordingly.

14. 182-correct the word tigrai region

15. Table one- who is literate on your study? You need to put operational definition if there is new thing otherwise those who were attending primary and secondary school should have another meaning.

16. Line-185-189 needs grammatical arrangement

17. Table 2- what is your base to categories parity? Do you think there is no difference b/n Para one and Para two mothers on utilization and timely initiation of antenatal care ?

18. On the same table ( table 2) age of mothers at first pregnancy was categorized as <19 and >20 what about those mothers whose age was 19 and 20 ?

19. Line 193-197-keep its coherence

20. Table 4-correct the heading as other tables .women developmental army group leader should have 2 option s(yes /no )but here is it has 3 alternatives .s ee it carefully

21. Line 210-be consistent headings .

22. It is not related with your objective

23. How did you measured uptake of components of antenatal care service ? how much service is required to say ‘ yes’ in each visit ?N:B utilization of all component of ANC service can not affect ANC completion but the reveres might be true.

25. Line - 276 being membership in health insuranceis different from health insurance plan .DISCUSSION

26. LINE 2976-324 not in line with your objective .There is a variation b/n yours and others

27. Discussion should be in line with your 2 objectives ,precise and arranged coherently .But ,here it includes conclusion s and back ground information about maternal health .

28. Line 330-331-you are using similar citations( R-15) for a study conducted in Uganda and yem ,how could be ?

29. Line 334-338- try to relate your finding with others.

30. Line 343 replace’ …his idea… ‘with ‘…this idea…

31. Conclusion part Line 346’-no need of repetition of result here rather you can say high or low according to others result

32. 351-358 shows the significance of the study and Justification so ,remove it since it is not the right place

33. Line 360-363the recommendations ; the recommendations part deals about awareness creation availability and accessibility of ANC service However you didn’t show the gap on the result part .So , the recommendation should be in line with your findings which can answer your objectives.

34. Line 370in the limitation part recall bias was one of the problem you faced during data collection

How did you managed it?because it directly affect your outcome variable .

35. Line 371-372what was the need of excluding mothers who had a previous history of pregnancy complication ?Even it could be one of the factor to attained ANC timely .Idont think so ,it could be considered as limitation of study .

36. Reference –line 410,REF 13 and line 416 R16 are similar references

37. Line414 REF14 and REF17 are similar references.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Annalisa Inversetti

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Sara Ornaghi

17 Jul 2020

Coverage of completion of four ANC visits based on recommended time schedule in Northern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study design

PONE-D-20-10078R1

Dear Dr. Beraki,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sara Ornaghi, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Annalisa Inversetti

Acceptance letter

Sara Ornaghi

3 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-10078R1

Coverage of completion of four ANC visits based on recommended time schedule in Northern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study design

Dear Dr. Ftwi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sara Ornaghi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Dataset of the prevalence and factors related to the completion of four ANC visit using a community based cross-sectional.

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewrs.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES