In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 1, 2 as published. The order of the figures was reversed while the legends of these figures were correct.
Figure 1.
Overview of methods currently in use to perform physical GF immobilization.
Figure 2.
Overview of current chemical immobilization strategies. In covalent methods, acrylate crosslinking is representative of the conjugation of an acryloyl GF and PEG-diacrylate matrix. While, mussel-based immobilization shows the interaction between the GF and polydopamine coated on the surface.
The corrected Figures 1, 2 appear below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.