Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Aug 20;125(6):1002–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.060

Epigenetic susceptibility to severe respiratory viral infections and its therapeutic implications: a narrative review

Ettore Crimi 1,2,∗,, Giuditta Benincasa 3,, Neisaliz Figueroa-Marrero 1,2, Massimiliano Galdiero 4, Claudio Napoli 3,5
PMCID: PMC7438995  PMID: 32828489

Abstract

The emergence of highly pathogenic strains of influenza virus and coronavirus (CoV) has been responsible for large epidemic and pandemic outbreaks characterised by severe pulmonary illness associated with high morbidity and mortality. One major challenge for critical care is to stratify and minimise the risk of multi-organ failure during the stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs may lead to perturbations of the host immune-related transcriptional programmes by regulating chromatin structure and gene expression patterns. Viruses causing severe pulmonary illness can use epigenetic-regulated mechanisms during host–pathogen interaction to interfere with innate and adaptive immunity, adequacy of inflammatory response, and overall outcome of viral infections. For example, Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV and H5N1 can affect host antigen presentation through DNA methylation and histone modifications. The same mechanisms would presumably occur in patients with coronavirus disease 2019, in which tocilizumab may epigenetically reduce microvascular damage. Targeting epigenetic pathways by immune modulators (e.g. tocilizumab) or repurposed drugs (e.g. statins) may provide novel therapeutic opportunities to control viral–host interaction during critical illness. In this review, we provide an update on epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms and repurposed drugs interfering with epigenetic pathways which may be clinically suitable for risk stratification and beneficial for treatment of patients affected by severe viral respiratory infections.

Keywords: coronavirus, COVID-19, epigenetic drugs, epigenetics, host–viral interactions, influenza virus, intensive care, severe acute respiratory syndrome


Editor's key points.

  • The authors reviewed the literature and ongoing clinical trials, and show that epigenetic biomarkers may stratify the risk of severe respiratory infection.

  • As deoxyribonucleic acid methylation can be reversed, at least partially, some drugs (curcumin, apabetalone, and repurposed drugs such as statins and tocilizumab) may contribute to better treatment of such patients by interfering with epigenetic pathways.

Over the past two decades, we have experienced the emergence of newly recognised highly pathogenic strains of influenza virus (i.e. influenza A virus subtype H1N1 or swine influenza, and influenza A virus subtype H5N1 or avian influenza) and coronavirus (CoV) (i.e. severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS]-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS]-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) responsible for pandemic infections associated with high morbidity and mortality.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 These viruses may cause a wide spectrum of respiratory manifestations associated with massive inflammatory cell infiltration and proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine release resulting in acute lung injury (ALI); acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); and, ultimately, death from multi-organ failure (MOF).6, 7, 8 Molecular mechanisms regulating virus–host interactions can significantly affect the degree and adequacy of both immune and inflammatory responses influencing clinical outcomes.9, 10, 11 For the critical care physicians, to identify and prevent the occurrence of this exuberant inflammatory response and to stratify the risk of MOF in the intensive care unit (ICU) are still major challenges.12

Epigenetics may influence host susceptibility to such viral infections.13 Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation, ribonucleic acid (RNA) methylation, histone tail changes, and also non-coding RNAs are heritable and acquired modifications able to alter gene expression at different levels without any changes in the primary DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms, by regulating chromatin structure and gene expression patterns, modulate host immunity and inflammatory response.14 In critical illness, such epigenetic modifications can promote the release of proinflammatory cytokines and activation of inflammatory cells, responsible for oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, apoptosis, and MOF.15 Epigenetics can also regulate the interaction between host and multidrug-resistant bacteria.16

The interaction of viruses with host cells can cause perturbations of transcriptional programmes involving such epigenetic mechanisms leading to viral shedding and inadequate immune response.13 Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV and H5N1 infections can antagonise the host immune response by modulating antigen presentation through DNA methylation and histone modifications.17, 18, 19, 20 Similar mechanisms would occur during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).21 , 22 Indeed, advanced bioinformatic tools have predicted the possibility of using microRNAs (miRNAs) to inhibit infections caused by COVID-19, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV by inhibiting the translation of viral proteins and viral replication.21 As some epigenetic changes can be reversed by small agents, known as ‘epidrugs’, or alternatively, epigenetic pathways can be interfered by immune modulators, they might provide useful drug targets to ameliorate the clinical outcome during viral respiratory infections.23 , 24 Ongoing trials will answer to this possible clinical application. The goal of the review was to provide an appropriate pathogenic scenario in which epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms and epidrugs may be clinically useful to stratify risk and treatment of patients in ICU affected by severe viral respiratory infections.

Severe respiratory viral infections: pathogenesis and clinical manifestations

Influenza viruses

Influenza viruses are enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses classified into three major serotypes: A, B, and C. Influenza A viruses, the most extensively studied, are further classified based on the different subtypes of the two surface glycoproteins: haemagglutinin (H1–H18) and neuraminidase (N1–N11) which facilitate virus binding to host respiratory epithelial cells via a sialic acid receptor and virions released from cells, respectively.25 Avian influenza A virus H5N126−28 and swine influenza A H1N129−34 infections have caused acute respiratory failure secondary to severe pneumonia and ARDS. The highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus H5N1, first described in 1996, caused severe pneumonia with high mortality (more than 60%), secondary to ARDS and MOF.26, 27, 28 Risks factors for severe influenza A H1N1 infection included pregnancy, obesity, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 Mitigation of the pathogenicity of the pandemic virus was probably caused by the presence of a cross-reactive cell response against this virus, which was boosted by seasonal vaccination.35 In Table 1 , we summarised clinical and immunological features of viral respiratory infections by influenza viruses.36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44

Table 1.

Clinical and immunological features of viral respiratory infections by influenza viruses.36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CR, conventional radiograph; CT, computed tomography; GGO, ground glass opacity; HF, heart failure; IFNγ, interferon γ; IL-1 RA, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein; IP-10, interferon-γ-inducible protein-10; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MIP 1-b, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-B; TLR-3, Toll-like receptor Type 3; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-alpha.

Clinical signs and symptoms Complications Lung pathological features Immunological features Radiographic findings
Fever; aching muscles; chills and sweats; headache; dry, persistent cough; fatigue and weakness; nasal congestion; sore throat In young children: otitis media and respiratory complications, such as croup, bronchiolitis, myocarditis and pericarditis, severe myositis, and encephalopathy; encephalitis; transverse myelitis; and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
In all ages: dehydration and exacerbation of underlying chronic diseases (e.g. HF, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes, COPD, asthma)
Diffuse alveolar damage with alveolar haemorrhage and necrotising bronchiolitis
Viral antigen localisation in Type 2 pneumocytes and alveolar lining cells
Upregulation of TLR-3, IFNα, IL-1 RA, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP 1-b, and IP-10, and increased numbers of CD3+ and CD08+ T cells
Initial viral immune evasion from the host immune system followed by cytokine storm
Abnormal chest CR (pulmonary infiltrate, consolidation, and pleural effusion) or CT (GGO and pleural effusion) on admission was associated with worse clinical outcomes

Coronaviruses

Coronaviruses, named after their crown-like structure, are enveloped, positive-sense RNA viruses, containing the largest known genome amongst RNA viruses. The CoV genome encodes for 16 non-structural proteins, which form the viral replicase transcriptase complex, and four essential structural proteins, involved in the host immune response and virion assembly: the spike (S) protein, responsible for receptor binding and viral entry into the host cell; the membrane (M) and envelope (E) proteins, responsible for virus assembly and release; and the nucleocapsid (N) protein, important for RNA synthesis and its final packaging into the viral particles.45 The genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is about 79% identical to the SARS-CoV and 50% to the MERS-CoV.46 These viruses cause severe respiratory infections (Table 2 ).47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60

Table 2.

Clinical and immunological features of viral respiratory infections by highly pathogenic coronaviruses.47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; BOOP, bronchiolitis obliterans organising pneumonia; CT, computed tomography; HF, heart failure; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Clinical signs and symptoms Transmissibility and mortality rate Lung pathological features Immunological features Radiographic findings
Early stage: moderate disease with flu-like symptoms
Advanced stage: ARDS, septic shock, acute kidney injury, HF, coagulation dysfunction, and death (mainly in older patients)
SARS-CoV-2 shows a higher transmissibility rate with respect to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV
MERS-CoV shows a mortality rate higher than SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
Early stage: diffuse alveolar damage (necrosis of alveolar epithelial cells, hyaline membrane formation, infiltration with inflammatory cells, and presence of giant multinucleated cells)
Proliferative phase: hyperplasia of Type II pneumocytes (with mild-to-moderate fibrosis and a BOOP pattern)
Initiation phase: antiviral innate immunity in the lung
Resolution phase: viral clearance and the process
Restoration phase: repair processes associated with viral respiratory tract infections
Chest CT shows bilateral ground glass opacities and subsegmental areas of consolidation

Older adults with co-morbidities, especially cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, renal failure, and COPD, are at higher risk of severe disease.51 , 56 ICU admission for organ support occurs in about 20–30%, 5–36%, and 50–89% of patients infected with SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV, respectively.3 , 51, 52, 53 , 56 Currently, global public health is facing the COVID-19 pandemic as the third CoV crisis in less than 20 yr (https://www.nih.gov/health-information/coronavirus).

Coronaviruses are capable of infecting several other organs, as demonstrated by the presence of SARS-CoV in circulating immune cells, neurones, intestinal mucosa, and epithelium of renal distal tubules.61 Coronaviruses–host interaction can influence susceptibility to CoV infection and progression to severe disease.3 , 11 After entering the body via the respiratory system, a critical step for cell entry and infection is the binding of the envelope S glycoprotein to the epithelial cells through specific receptors. The S protein of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) molecule present on cells through the receptor-binding domain,62 , 63 whilst MERS-CoV binds to the host cell protein dipeptidyl peptidase 4.64 After binding to the host, the S protein needs to be activated by a cellular protease, the transmembrane protease serine 2, which cleaves S in two subunits liberating the fusion peptide that mediates the fusion of the viral envelope with the cellular membrane. Differences in the structural and dynamic state of the receptor-binding domain65 and S protein priming66 between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 cause higher ACE2-binding affinity of the SARS-CoV-2 and favour its evasion of the immune surveillance,64 suggesting a potential explanation of the higher SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.63 Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 can play a protective role in lung injury,67 and its downregulation by SARS-CoV can contribute to progression to severe lung injury.68 On the contrary, MERS-CoV regulates dipeptidyl peptidase 4 receptor in the lungs of smokers and COPD, and this could explain their susceptibility to severe disease.69

To survive in the host cells, the CoVs adopt multiple strategies to evade detection by the host immune system, allowing active virus replication. The virus can downregulate genes involved in the antigen presentation, such as retinoic-acid-inducible gene and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5, and interfere with intracellular signalling pathways through structural (proteins M and N) and non-structural proteins, so delaying interferon (IFN) expression.3 , 17 , 70 , 71

Ultimately, a delayed but excessive reaction of the immune system with an uncontrolled expression of cytokines and chemokines (the so-called cytokine storm) associated with virus-induced cytopathic effects will result in lung epithelial and endothelial cell apoptosis and activation of the coagulation cascade, leading to vascular leakage; alveolar oedema; microvascular thrombosis; and, later, cell proliferation with pulmonary fibrosis.3 , 11 , 47 Cytokine storm in such patients is associated with more severe lung injury, ICU admission, and worse outcome.3 , 51 , 71 To date, no definitive treatment for SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 is available, although several strategies have been studied.72

Epigenetic mechanisms and respiratory viral infections

Viruses causing severe pulmonary illness can use three epigenetic-regulated ways during host–pathogen interaction: (i) they can affect host DNA methylation signatures and miRNAs regulating a cassette of genes underlying innate and adaptive antiviral responses; (ii) they can encode for viral proteins that directly interact with the host modified histones; and (iii) they can manipulate the host miRNA processing nuclear machinery to encode viral non-canonical miRNA-like RNA fragments (v-miRNAs) regulating the viral life cycle and immune response.73 Here, we focus on epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms by which H5N1 and SARS-CoV-2 may affect susceptibility to pulmonary illness by interfering with both innate and adaptive immune responses in humans74 , 75 (Fig. 1 and Table 3 ).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Viral–host epigenetic interactions. We illustrated three putative cell-specific epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 may impact on individual sensitiveness to severe pulmonary critical illness. Mainly, T cells and neutrophils can undergo deoxyribonucleic acid hypomethylation and histone modifications, respectively, in COVID-19 patients. Otherwise, in vitro lung epithelial cells upon H5N1 infection can undergo modifications of micro-ribonucleic acid (RNA) patterns and histone tail marks, leading to downregulation of antiviral defence (see the text for more details). ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; AGO2, argonaute 2; CGI, CpG island; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; mRNA, messenger RNA; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; NS1, non-structural protein 1; PCBP2, poly(RC)-binding protein 2; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Table 3.

Major epigenetic mechanisms during viral respiratory infections. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; CFHR1, complement factor H-related 1; DDX58, DExD/H-box helicase 58; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; PCBP2, poly(RC) binding protein 2; SAMD9L, sterile alpha motif domain-containing protein 9-like; v-miRNA, viral micro-ribonucleic acid.

Sample source Epigenetic modification Region Gene target Effect References
H5N1 avian influenza A
 Human airway cells Increased levels of H3K27me3 and decreased levels of H3K4me3 Regulatory regions SMAD9L, CFHR1, and DDX58 Impaired host antiviral response Chiu and Openshaw75
 Human macrophages miR-HA-3p (v-miRNA) PCBP2 Downregulation of PCBP2 antiviral signalling Li and colleagues76
Sars-CoV-2
 T cells of lupus patients DNA hypomethylation CpG sites ACE2 Increased expression of ACE2 protein leading to higher susceptibility to infection Sawalha and colleagues77
 Lung biopsy NETosis Nucleosomes Increased risk for thromboembolic events in patients affected by COVID-19 Barnes and colleagues78

H5N1 avian influenza A

Histone modifications

By combining multi-omics data, H5N1 antagonised the early host antiviral response by altering histone methylation at Type I IFN-sensitive genes.18 In detail, NS1 viral protein was associated with parallel increased H3K27me3 (repressive mark) and decreased H3K4me3 (active mark) levels favouring a heterochromatin state surrounding the SMAD9L, CFHR1, and DDX58 genes in human airway cells.18

Viral non-canonical miRNA-like RNA fragments

Comparing with DNA virus, a few reports provided proofs of v-miRNAs originating from RNA virus. Varble and colleagues79 incorporated a hairpin miRNA-124 into the influenza virus genome showing that the engineered virus was able to produce a functional miR-124 without any harmful consequence on the viral life cycle. This suggested that RNA viruses may also exploit the host nuclear RNA machinery to synthesise v-miRNAs, which might contribute to the typical influenza-virus-induced cytokine storm. Successively, Umbach and colleagues80 demonstrated that the 5′ end of all the eight segments of the influenza virus can codify for small viral leader RNAs, which are involved in the genomic RNA encapsidation to provide a new progeny of virions, suggesting a relevant role in the viral life cycle. Li and colleagues76 have demonstrated that H5N1 virus encodes miR-HA-3p, a miRNA-like small RNA exacerbating the production of antiviral cytokines by downregulating the poly(RC)-binding protein 2 gene, a master regulator of the retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG)/mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein (MAVS) antiviral signalling, in human macrophages. This proved a novel virulence factor underlying H5N1-induced cytokine storm and high mortality76; however, v-miRNA biogenesis and function remain to be clarified.81 Overall, the virus skill to produce functional miRNAs can be also exploited to construct delivery systems of miRNAs based on RNA viruses as molecular vectors.82

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

DNA methylation

The high transmissibility and asymptomatic infection rates of SARS-CoV-2 may be caused by a more efficient virus replication and reduced IFN production in lung tissues.83 As both SARS-CoV-2 and MERS can reprogramme the host epigenome, we hypothesise a possible role for epigenetic drivers underlying susceptibility to COVID-19.

Sawalha and colleagues77 have proposed oxidative-stress-induced epigenetic pathways linked to ACE2 deregulation to increase susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 in patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Indeed, the ACE2 gene CpG hypomethylation status characterising SLE patients could be exacerbated upon SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to further ACE2 protein overexpression in T cells, thus promoting viral infections and dissemination.77 Disease-related epigenetic perturbations might be hotspots favouring viral infection and provide risk biomarkers useful to stratify sensitiveness to infection and disease severity in patients more prone to disseminate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with this, a bioinformatic analysis focusing on ACE2 gene has supported the hypothesis for which DNA methylation signatures are dependent on host cell type and gender and age, which are risk factors associated with increased susceptibility to COVID-19 and poor prognosis.84

NETosis

Patients affected by COVID-19 are at higher risk of thromboembolic events and disseminated intravascular coagulation.85 As evidence of neutrophil lung infiltration, Barnes and colleagues78 have emphasised the key role of NETosis in contributing to organ damage and mortality of patients affected by COVID-19. Physiologically, NETosis is a form of innate immunity, in which the neutrophil cell death is guided from histone H3 modifications and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), complexes of DNA fibres, histones, and proteins aimed to provide a scaffold for platelet adhesion and aggregation to entrap pathogens and avoid their diffusion.86 Moreover, NETs can induce macrophages to secrete IL1B to further sustain the signalling loop between macrophages and neutrophils, leading to progressive inflammatory damage. Previously, NETosis dysregulation was linked to thrombotic events,86 ARDS, pulmonary inflammation, and extensive lung damage.87 Interestingly, there is evidence for which heparin can dismantle NETs and prevent histone-induced platelet aggregation. This might represent the molecular basis for which heparin treatment reduces mortality in subjects affected by severe COVID-19, which develop sepsis-induced coagulopathy.88 Thus, deoxyribonuclease I-mediated degradation of NETs could provide a therapeutic avenue to suppress excess injury in patients severely affected by COVID-19.89

Epitranscriptome

The epitranscriptome of SARS-CoV-2 was analaysed as a possible strategy to dissect the hidden layer of viral regulation. By using nanopore direct RNA sequencing, almost 41 RNA modification sites, mostly located in the AAGAA motif on viral transcripts with shorter poly(A) tails, have been suggested.90 As poly(A) tails play a relevant role in RNA turnover and stability, the proposed modifications may represent one of the molecular mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 evades the host immune response and indices the cytokine storm.90 Besides, the authors did not identify what type of RNA modifications occur at these sites and the mechanisms underlying COVID-19 pathogenesis.90

Epitherapy and immune modulators

Nowadays, the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens continuously increases, thus the discovery of novel drugs or the repositioning of already-approved drugs is needed.16 Epitherapy may provide further therapeutic opportunities to control viral–host interaction during critical illness.91 In particular, the current emergence of COVID-19 is guiding researchers towards the possible repurposing of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved epidrugs,92 including metformin and statins, which may be effective against the novel SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we give an update on clinical evidence about the usefulness of novel and FDA-approved drugs interfering with epigenetic pathways, which were applied to ICU patients affected by highly pathogenic strains of influenza virus and CoV, with a particular interest about the novel SARS-CoV-2 (Table 4 ).

Table 4.

Epidrugs and repurposed drugs in viral respiratory infections. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; A549, human Type II pneumocyte cell line; BETi, bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibitor; HDACi, histone deacetylase inhibitor; IL-6, interleukin-6; miRNA, micro-ribonucleic acid; MYD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cell; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial cell; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RANTES, C–C chemokine ligand 5; TCZ, tocilizumab; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-alpha; T2D, Type 2 diabetes.

Chemical compound Epigenetic-oriented mechanism of action Viral infection Proinflammatory/cytokine storm target Epigenetic-related effects Sample source References
De novo epidrug
 Curcumin HDACi H1N1 NF-κB Downregulation of inflammation Human macrophages Xu and Liu93
 Apabetalone BET2/4i SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 Possible reduction of viral infection and replication Human cells Gordon and colleagues94
Epidrug repurposing
 Statins HDACi H1N1 RANTES Block of key factors in virus infectivity NHBE, A549 Lee and colleagues95
TLR-MYD88-NFKB axis Possible use in MERS-CoV infection Yuan96
 Metformin HDACi H1N1 TNF-α Reduction of proinflammatory late/exhausted memory B-cell subset and increased antibody response to the influenza vaccine B cells from diabetics (T2D) vs healthy subjects Diaz and colleagues97
Immunomodulator repurposing
 TCZ Not properly defined epidrug SARS-CoV-2 IL-6 Reduction of inflammation by impacting on NETosis and upregulating circulating miRNA-23, miRNA-146, and miRNA-223 Neutrophils and plasma collected from AR patients Ruiz-Limón and colleagues98 and Müller and colleagues99

In recent years, a few epidrugs have been introduced into clinic use (e.g. vorinostat and belinostat mainly to treat haematological malignancies), and a wide range of epigenetic-based drugs are undergoing trials, which will clarify whether pharmacological epigenetic modulation is of clinical interest (Table 5 ). The road from discovery to clinical approval requires long timelines; thus, the repurposing of old drugs interfering with epigenetic pathways is another goal. In this case, epigenetic effect is inevitably going to be ‘off-target’ in comparison with the drug action used in the first place. Experimental evidence demonstrated that the effects of epidrugs were achieved at lower doses with prolonged exposure, whereas higher drug concentrations were detrimental. However, when ongoing trials will be completed, we will establish clinically if the dose used for epigenetic modification reversal would be the same as, less than, or more than that used for the original purpose.

Table 5.

Novel and repurposed drugs modulating epigenetic pathways in clinical trials to treat viral pulmonary infections.

Epidrug Conditions Study type Study title Aim Status/phase ID
Influenza viruses
Repurposed drugs
 Statins Influenza Interventional; 116 participants; randomised Statin therapy in acute influenza To test whether the anti-inflammatory effects of statins will decrease the severity of illness in patients who are infected with influenza Completed/Phase 2 NCT02056340
Patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia Adults; older patients Statins in the prevention of myocardial damage in pneumonia To test the efficacy in preventing cardiovascular complications Ongoing EudraCT number: 2013-002799-42
Patients affected by sepsis Adults; older patients Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 40 mg day−1 of atorvastatin on reduction in severity of sepsis in ward patients To test the efficacy in preventing sepsis-related complications Ongoing EudraCT number: 2005-004636-52
Coronaviruses
Drugs interfering with epigenetic pathways
 Ruxolitinib with simvastatin Coronavirus infection Interventional; 94 participants; randomised Study of Ruxolitinib Plus Simvastatin in the Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Failure of COVID-19 (Ruxo-Sim-20) To test the combined use of ruxolitinib with simvastatin looking for a synergistic effect in the inhibition of viral entry and in the anti-inflammatory effect Phases 1 and 2/recruiting NCT04348695
Epigenetic-oriented repurposed drugs
 Artemisinin, curcumin, frankincense, and vitamin C (ArtemiC) COVID-19 coronavirus infection; SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection Interventional; 50 participants; randomised A Phase II controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the effect of ArtemiC in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 To test the efficacy in treatment for the COVID-19 as a food supplement Phase 2/recruiting NCT04382040
 Vitamin C Vitamin C, pneumonia, viral, pneumonia, ventilator associated Interventional; 140 participants; randomised Vitamin C infusion for the treatment of severe 2019-nCoV infected pneumonia To test vitamin C infusion in improving the prognosis of patients Phase 2/recruiting NCT04264533
 Tocilizumab COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 398 participants; randomised Efficacy of early administration of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients To test whether early administration of tocilizumab compared with late administration of tocilizumab can reduce the number of patients with COVID-19 who require mechanical ventilation Phase 2/recruiting NCT04346355
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 400 participants; randomised A RCT–Safety & Efficacy of Tocilizumab–Tx of Severe COVID-19: ARCHITECTS (ARCHITECTS) To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tocilizumab relative to placebo amongst approximately 300 hospitalised adult patients who have severe COVID-19 Phase 3/recruiting NCT04412772
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 206 participants; randomised An Open Randomized Therapeutic Trial Using ANAKINRA, TOCILIZUMAB Alone or in association with RUXOLITINIB in Severe Stage 2b and 3 of COVID19-associated Disease (INFLAMMACOV) To test the efficacy in treatment for the COVID-19 Phase 3/not yet recruiting NCT04424056
 Tocilizumab COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 60 participants; randomised Experimental use of tocilizumab (RoActemra®) in severe SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra) in hospitalised adults diagnosed with COVID-19 Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001770-30
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 500 participants A multicentre, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of i.v. tocilizumab for treating patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: the BREATH-19 study To evaluate the effectiveness of i.v. tocilizumab in treating patients with COVID-19 pneumonia Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001995-13
COVID-19 pneumonia with hypoxia Interventional; 354 participants; randomised Pre-emptive tocilizumab in hypoxic COVID-19 patients, a prospective randomised trial To assess in a randomised comparison the effect of pre-emptive tocilizumab in patients with hypoxia attributable to COVID-19 on 30-day mortality (from randomisation) Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001375-32
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 276 participants; randomised Pilot, randomised, multicentre, open-label clinical trial of combined use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and tocilizumab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) To evaluate in-hospital mortality or mechanical ventilation in the ICU, or need for a rescue dose of tocilizumab in patients with confirmed infection by COVID-19 in treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combined or non-tocilizumab Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001442-19
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 78 participants; randomised Single-centre, randomised, open-label clinical trial on the efficacy of tocilizumab in modifying the inflammatory parameters of patients with COVID-19 To assess the impact of administering two different tocilizumab regimens vs the standard of care on IL-12 levels in patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-002032-69
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 330 participants Multicentre study on the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia To describe: (i) whether IL-6 and CRP levels are predictive of treatment efficacy
(ii) trend of the Pao2/Fio2 ratio
(iii) trend of lymphocyte count
(iv) change of the ‘Sequential organ failure assessment’
(v) remission of respiratory symptoms to describe the toxicity of tocilizumab
Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001110-38
 Tocilizumab COVID-19 severe pneumonia Interventional; 450 participants; randomised A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TCZ compared with placebo in combination with SOC for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001154-22
COVID-19 pneumonia Interventional; 24 participants; randomised A randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab combined with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia who are unresponsive to standard care To assess the efficacy—as determined by the proportion of patients with normalisation of Spo2 ≥96%—of continued standard care together with tocilizumab plus pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who are non-responsive to front-line therapy within 48 h from treatment initiation Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001160-28
COVID-19 severe pneumonia Interventional; 200 participants; randomised Effectiveness of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors in the management of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: an open-label, multicentre, sequential RCT To investigate the effect of different types of IL-6 inhibition vs no adjuvant treatment compared with standard of care in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia Ongoing EudraCT number: 2020-001275-32
 Bevacizumab COVID-19 severe pneumonia Interventional; 20 participants A Pilot Study of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Severe or Critical Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia (BEST-CP) To evaluate bevacizumab for the treatment of ALI/ARDS and reduction of mortality in severe and critical COVID-19 patients through suppression of pulmonary oedema Recruiting NCT04348695
COVID-19 severe pneumonia Interventional; 140 participants; randomised Bevacizumab in severe or critically severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia RCT To evaluate the efficacy in treatment for COVID-19 Recruiting NCT04305106

De novo epidrugs

Curcumin

Curcumin, belonging to the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) group, is a natural polyphenol extracted from turmeric with a wide range of molecular targets and drug activities, including anti-inflammatory properties. Interestingly, after H1N1 infection, curcumin treatment downregulated the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and expression of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cell (NF-κB) gene in human macrophages without affecting cell viability.93 This evidence suggests that curcumin may confer protection against influenza A virus-induced ALI by counteracting the cytokine signalling without damaging the immune system.93 Interestingly, curcumin and demetoxycurcumin have been indicated as possible inhibitors of COVID-19 virus main protease, which plays a crucial function in controlling viral replication and transcription of SARS-CoV-2, suggesting a putative useful drug–target interaction to be validated in clinical trials.100

Apabetalone

An international consortium of scientists has identified 50 proteins as putative drug targets against COVID-19. Amongst these targets, bromodomain (BRD) 2/4 would be relevant during interaction with the (E) envelope proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and viral reproduction.94 By mimicking the histone structure, the (E) envelope proteins might potentially disrupt BRD-histone complexes. BRD proteins are epigenetic players that bind acetylated groups on histone proteins to aid in the recruitment of transcriptional machinery at promoter genes. Apabetalone can directly inhibit BET2/4 protein–SARS-CoV-2 interaction and may downregulate the expression of ACE2 receptors, which are exploited by the surface S glycoprotein to enter into human cells.101 Currently, apabetalone is not approved by FDA, but has already shown clinical safety as demonstrated during the Phase 3 trial (BETonMACE) focusing on secondary prevention of cardiovascular dysfunction in diabetics.102 Overall, this evidence suggests that apabetalone may potentially reduce viral infection and replication. In this way, Resverlogix Corporation (https://bit.ly/2CBaEKB) invites collaborators for further research on apabetalone as a putative therapeutic strategy for COVID-19.

Epidrug repurposing

Statins

Influenza viruses

Statins are hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors normalising lipid levels with pleiotropic epigenetic-oriented effects by acting as HDACi. As statins also show anti-inflammatory effects,103 they were thought to block the cytokine storm triggered by influenza viruses.95 Indeed, experimental evidence reported that statins can affect various molecular pathways underlying the virus life cycle, representing promising alternatives for influenza treatments by limiting apoptosis.95 , 104 However, retrospective clinical trials and epidemiological studies provided mixed results regarding the relationship between statin use and reduction of influenza virus morbidity.104 Evidence from four large clinical trials demonstrated that patients treated with statins may have a reduced immune response to the influenza vaccine with respect to controls (untreated patients).103 , 105, 106, 107 However, it should be noted that these studies enrolled patients with underlying acute respiratory or cardiovascular diseases; thus, the reduced response to influenza vaccine and the apparent major risk of influenza-like diseases in patients treated with statins might arise from pre-existent chronic diseases, independently from statin therapy. A completed clinical trial (NCT01427309) that enrolled 31 989 participants demonstrated that the administration of high-dose influenza vaccine to patients treated with statins may result in higher levels of antibodies and protection against the influenza viruses vs standard-dose vaccine.108 However, as statins are widely prescribed cardioprotective drugs, major knowledge about the molecular mechanisms by which they can control the cytokine overexpression and modulate the intense inflammatory response is needed to design novel combination therapies to improve customised treatments.

Coronaviruses

Clinical evidence about the use of statins in the treatment of viral pneumonia is limited and provided mixed results. Indeed, two trials reported that the anti-inflammatory effects of statins may reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality in ICU patients affected by pneumonia.109 , 110 Otherwise, the results of one randomised clinical trial did not support statin use in those patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.111 Currently, there is no clinical or experimental evidence supporting the assertion that statins can improve clinical management of COVID-19. As the rates of acute events and mortality associated with COVID-19 infection are extremely high in patients with cardiovascular diseases (10.8%) and diabetics (7.3%), which generally use statins as primary or secondary prevention, these patients should continue the treatment when SARS-CoV-2 infection is suspected or diagnosed (https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/features/∼/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel-MS-Word-etc/2020/02/S20028-ACC-Clinical-Bulletin-Coronavirus.pdf). Statins are cleared by the liver metabolism and can increase the level of transaminases in cardio-hepatic patients112; thus, strict evaluation and monitoring of statin therapy should be provided for COVID-19 patients, which commonly show an elevation of the aminotransferases (aspartate transaminase and alanine aminotransferase), with occasional alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin elevations underlying a high risk for hepatotoxicity.113 , 114 Whether a de novo use of statin therapy may play a key role in preventing COVID-19 complications remains to be elucidated. Remarkably, experimental studies supported the hypothesis for which an early and high dose of statins might be a useful strategy for the treatment of MERS-CoV infections by directly affecting the TLR–MYD88–NF-κB axis, which plays a pivotal role during CoV infections.96 , 115 , 116 Statins are the most common FDA-approved drugs classified as TLR–MYD88 antagonists; moreover, under normal conditions, statins did not strongly alter MYD88 levels, whereas they maintain basal MYD88 levels during stress and hypoxia.96 This supports that statins might be protective for patients affected by COVID-19. Thus, the putative regulation of MYD88 pathway via statins may be an attractive field of research to explore how to protect innate immune response against novel viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2.

Metformin

Influenza viruses

Metformin, belonging to HDACi class, is the first-line anti-hyperglycaemic drug for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, which can indirectly reduce chronic inflammation by normalising glucose levels or directly impact on inflammatory pathways. Recently, Saenwongsa and colleagues117 have demonstrated that after the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV), both the IgG antibody response and IFN-α expression were impaired in T2D patients treated with metformin via repression of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated pathway and impaired IgG avidity index, leading to increased sensitiveness to H1N1 and H3N2 infection. This suggests that the TIV may not be suitable for T2D patients treated with metformin by emphasising the necessity of developing a more customised strategy for influenza prevention in high-risk groups. Metformin may recover the influenza vaccine responses in T2D patients (treated and non-treated with metformin) by improving the B-cell function via parallel downregulation of inflammation and upregulation of AMPK phosphorylation (active form), a metabolic enzyme involved also in antibody responses.97 Understanding of the metformin effects on the immune system may guide the repurposing of this drug focused on therapeutic intervention on metabolism in inflammatory diseases.

Immunomodulators and antivirals: could they impact on epigenetic pathways underlying cardiovascular dysfunction in COVID-19?

The repurposing of both immunomodulators and antivirals, including tocilizumab (TCZ), remdesevir, favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine, could be a fast way to get effective treatments whilst a preventive vaccine will be available (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019). In the current COVID-19 pandemic, TCZ is one of the most promising repurposed drugs under clinical investigation for the treatment of severe hospitalised pneumonia patients. Tocilizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that can counteract the cytokine storm by blocking the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor signalling associated with a high risk of cardiovascular mortality.118 Immunomodulators can counteract the overactive inflammatory response, which seems to be the driver of increased disease severity. Many old anti-inflammatory drugs are in clinical trials, such as sarilumab (NCT04315298; Phases 2 and 3) and TCZ (NCT04320615; Phase 3). Besides, the efficacy of antivirals inhibiting viral replication, such as favipiravir (NCT04358549; Phase 2) and remdesevir (NCT04292730; Phase 3), is being evaluated in clinical trials compared with standard of care. The impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular health is an urgent question for physicians.119 As epigenetics plays an increasing role in cardiovascular diseases and inflammation,102 , 120 and also during SARS-CoV-2 infection,77 we emphasised the need to clarify if these drugs could potentially impact the associated cardiac dysfunction modulating the severity of the disease.

Clinical evidence from rheumatoid arthritis patients demonstrated that TCZ therapy can prevent cardiovascular dysfunction via two main epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms: (i) reduction of NETosis; and (ii) upregulation of miRNA-23, miRNA-146, and miRNA-223 serum levels.98 Overall, this suggests that TCZ can improve the pro-atherosclerotic status by regulating dyslipidaemias, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress.98 Moreover, TCZ-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients demonstrated a differential expression of 85 lncRNAs in CD14+ monocytes regulated by IL-6 or tumour necrosis factor-alpha.99

Preliminary trials have suggested the usefulness of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine repurposing in the treatment of COVID-19, which is correlated with the ability of these antimalarial agents in interfering with the cellular-mediated viral endocytosis.121 However, a randomised trial demonstrated that hydroxychloroquine failed in preventing symptomatic infection when taken within 4 days after exposure.122 At epigenetic level, hydroxychloroquine can exert an inhibitory activity against the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), responsible of switching chromatin towards a compacted state (inactive gene expression) in blood malignancies.123 Interestingly, influenza A viruses, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV are able to activate the PRC2, which, in turn, increases the levels of H3K27me3 (repressive mark) at the promoters of targeted IFN-stimulated genes to counteract the host antiviral immune response.124 This let us suggest that also SARS-CoV-2 might use the same mechanisms to inactive IFN-related pathways in infected cells; besides, since polycomb inhibitors have shown a general antiviral activity,125 it might be useful to investigate whether hydroxychloroquine can directly impact on PRC2 activity in COVID-19.

As reported, the clinical effect of i.v. remdesivir seems to be relatively modest; however, a randomised Phase 3 clinical trial (NCT04292899) did not find a significant difference in efficacy between 5- and 10-day courses of this drug.126 Until now, there is no direct evidence that antivirals, such as remdesevir and favipiravir, would impact epigenetic-sensitive ways during their mechanism of action.

Concluding remarks

Targeted epigenetic-sensitive molecular networks are temporally manipulated during virus–host interactions, providing further risk factors for viral shedding and inadequate immune response also in patients affected by COVID-19, in which ACE2 promoter hypomethylation may be one of the relevant drivers. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, we need to understand why a part of the population becomes critically infected when exposed to low viral load, whilst other subjects are less responsive when exposed to high viral loads. As the influenza virus may also promote acute coronary syndromes (which can be reduced by vaccine),127 the issue of co-infection (i.e. SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses) needs to be further explored both in terms of epigenetic-sensitive tandem events and in critical care. For better risk stratification, it would be needed to clarify the SARS-CoV-2 basic mechanisms of action and how these impact on the individual genetic/epigenetic background and pre-existent cardio-metabolic diseases highly correlated with mortality rate, especially in the elderly.128 , 129

Clinical treatment of mild forms of COVID-19 should not be phobic from fever, which can promote an effective immune response and virus clearance from the body.130 Ongoing controlled clinical trials would clarify the repositioning of TCZ, whereas curcumin, apabetalone, metformin, and statins could be an effective treatment to protect innate immune response against severe viral respiratory infections. In the era of network medicine, predictive analysis tools are playing a relevant role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic by providing maps of human proteins interacting with SARS-CoV-2 proteins101 and a list of candidate repurpose drugs and potential drug combinations targeting SARS-CoV-2.131 The epigenetic susceptibility to pulmonary viral infections requires further investigation by using the network-oriented analysis to clarify the molecular routes underlying perturbation of the human interactome,132 in particular in COVID-19 and its impact on cardiovascular health.

Authors' contributions

Design/implementation of the review: EC, GB, CN

Critical feedback: NF-M, MG

Writing of paper: all authors

Declarations of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

National Grant Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) 2017 (2017F8ZB89) funded by the Italian Ministry of Research to CN; University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli educational grant to GB.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported (in whole or in part) by Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) or HCA affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA or any of its affiliated entities.

Handling editor: Jonathan Hardman

References

  • 1.Jhung M.A., Swerdlow D., Olsen S.J., et al. Epidemiology of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:13–26. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qun L., Lei Z., Minghao Z., Zhiping C., Furong L., Huanyu W. Epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:520–532. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Wit E., van Doremalen N., Falzarano D., Munster V.J. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:523–534. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perlman S. Another decade, another coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:760–762. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2001126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nicholls J.M., Poon L.L., Lee K.C., et al. Lung pathology of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1773–1778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13413-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bradley B.T., Bryan A. Emerging respiratory infections: the infectious disease pathology of SARS, MERS, pandemic influenza, and Legionella. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36:152–159. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2019.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ding Y., He L., Zhang Q., et al. Organ distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in SARS patients: implications for pathogenesis and virus transmission pathways. J Pathol. 2004;203:622–630. doi: 10.1002/path.1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tisoncik J.R., Korth M.J., Simmons C.P., Farrar J., Martin T.R., Katze M.G. Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:16–32. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05015-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tavares L.P., Teixeira M.M., Garcia C.C. The inflammatory response triggered by Influenza virus: a two edged sword. Inflamm Res. 2017;66:283–302. doi: 10.1007/s00011-016-0996-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li G., Fan Y., Lai Y., et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020;92:424–432. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zaim S., Chong J.H., Sankaranarayanan V., Harky A. COVID-19 and multi-organ response. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schäfer A., Baric R.S. Epigenetic landscape during coronavirus infection. Pathogens. 2017;6:8. doi: 10.3390/pathogens6010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Busslinger M., Tarakhovsky A. Epigenetic control of immunity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a019307. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crimi E., Cirri S., Benincasa G., Napoli C. Epigenetics mechanisms in multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:1422–1432. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crimi E., Benincasa G., Cirri S., Mutesi R., Faenza M., Napoli C. Clinical epigenetics and multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: host remodelling in critical illness. Epigenetics. 2020;1–13 doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1748918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Comar C.E., Goldstein S.A., Li Y., Yount B., Baric R.S., Weiss S.R. Antagonism of dsRNA-induced innate immune pathways by NS4a and NS4b accessory proteins during MERS coronavirus infection. mBio. 2019;10 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00319-19. e00319–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Menachery V.D., Eisfeld A.J., Schäfer A., et al. Pathogenic influenza viruses and coronaviruses utilize similar and contrasting approaches to control interferon-stimulated gene responses. mBio. 2014;5 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01174-14. e01174–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marazzi I., Ho J.S., Kim J., et al. Suppression of the antiviral response by an influenza histone mimic. Nature. 2012;483:428–433. doi: 10.1038/nature10892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qin S., Liu Y., Tempel W., et al. Structural basis for histone mimicry and hijacking of host proteins by influenza virus protein NS1. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3952. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ivashchenko A., Rakhmetullina A., Akimniyazova A., Aisina D., Pyrkova A. The miRNA complexes against coronaviruses COVID-19, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV. Res Sq. 2020 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-19592/v1. Advance Access published on March 31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhi L., Jianwei W., Yuyu X., et al. Implications of the virus-encoded miRNA and host miRNA in the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2. arXiv. 2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04874 Advance Access published on April 10. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vachharajani V., Liu T., McCall C.E. Epigenetic coordination of acute systemic inflammation: potential therapeutic targets. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014;10:1141–1150. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.943192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schiano C., Benincasa G., Franzese M., et al. Epigenetic-sensitive pathways in personalized therapy of major cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2020;210:107514. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pascua P.N., Choi Y.K. Zoonotic infections with avian influenza A viruses and vaccine preparedness: a game of mix and match. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2014;3:140–148. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2014.3.2.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Claas E.C., Osterhaus A.D., van Beek R., et al. Human influenza A H5N1 virus related to a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Lancet. 1998;351:472–477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beigel J.H., Farrar J., Han A.M., et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1374–1385. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Writing Committee of the Second World Health Organization Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Human Infection with Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus, Abdel-Ghafar AN, Chotpitayasunondh T, et al. Update on avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection in humans. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:261–273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Domínguez-Cherit G., Lapinsky S.E., Macias A.E., et al. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA. 2009;302:1880–1887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team. Dawood F.S., Jain S., Finelli L., et al. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2605–2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jain S., Kamimoto L., Bramley A.M., et al. Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April–June 2009. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1935–1944. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar A., Zarychanski R., Pinto R., et al. Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA. 2009;302:1872–1879. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.ANZIC Influenza Investigators. Webb S.A., Pettilä V., Seppelt I., et al. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1925–1934. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dominguez-Cherit G., De la Torre A., Rishu A., et al. Influenza A (H1N1pdm09)-related critical illness and mortality in Mexico and Canada, 2014. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1861–1870. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Iorio A.M., Bistoni O., Galdiero M., et al. Influenza viruses and cross-reactivity in healthy adults: humoral and cellular immunity induced by seasonal 2007/2008 influenza vaccination against vaccine antigens and 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic influenza virus. Vaccine. 2012;30:1617–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.To K.F., Chan P.K., Chan K.F., et al. Pathology of fatal human infection associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. J Med Virol. 2001;63:242–246. doi: 10.1002/1096-9071(200103)63:3<242::aid-jmv1007>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peiris J.S., Yu W.C., Leung C.W., et al. Re-emergence of fatal human influenza A subtype H5N1 disease. Lancet. 2004;363:617–619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15595-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mauad T., Hajjar L.A., Callegari G.D., et al. Lung pathology in fatal novel human influenza A (H1N1) infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:72–79. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1420OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shieh W.J., Blau D.M., Denison A.M., et al. 2009 Pandemic influenza A (H1N1): pathology and pathogenesis of 100 fatal cases in the United States. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:166–175. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gao R., Bhatnagar J., Blau D.M., et al. Cytokine and chemokine profiles in lung tissues from fatal cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): role of the host immune response in pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1258–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zheng J., Perlman S. Immune responses in influenza A virus and human coronavirus infections: an ongoing battle between the virus and host. Curr Opin Virol. 2018;28:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu Q., Zhou Y.-H., Yang Z.-Q. The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13:3–10. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schoen K., Horvat N., Guerreiro N.F.C., de Castro I., de Giassi K.S. Spectrum of clinical and radiographic findings in patients with diagnosis of H1N1 and correlation with clinical severity. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:964. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4592-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.de Jong M.D., Simmons C.P., Thanh T.T., et al. Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat Med. 2006;12:1203–1207. doi: 10.1038/nm1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cui J., Li F., Shi Z.L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lu R., Zhao X., Li J., et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu J., Zheng X., Tong Q., et al. Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 2020;92:491–494. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li J.Y., You Z., Wang Q., et al. The epidemic of 2019-novel-coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia and insights for emerging infectious diseases in the future. Microbe. Infect. 2020;22:80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yin Y., Wunderink R.G. MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology. 2018;23:130–137. doi: 10.1111/resp.13196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hui D.S., Azhar E.I., Kim Y.J., Memish Z.A., Oh M.D., Zumla A. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: risk factors and determinants of primary, household, and nosocomial transmission. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:e217–e227. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30127-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen N., Zhou M., Dong X., et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395:507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y., et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Richardson S., Hirsch J.S., Narasimhan M., et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020;323:2052–2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mehra M.R., Desai S.S., Kuy S., Henry T.D., Patel A.N. Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:e102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 56.Grasselli G., Zangrillo A., Zanella A., et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region. Italy JAMA. 2020;323:1574–1581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen T., Wu D., Chen H., et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shi H., Han X., Jiang N., et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tian S., Xiong Y., Liu H., et al. Pathological study of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through postmortem core biopsies. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:1007–1014. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0536-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ng D.L., Al Hosani F., Keating M.K., et al. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings of a fatal case of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in the United Arab Emirates. Am J Pathol. 2016;186:652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.10.024. April 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gu J., Gong E., Zhang B., et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J Exp Med. 2005;202:415–424. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang H., Penninger J.M., Li Y., Zhong N., Slutsky A.S. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:586–590. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shang J., Wan Y., Luo C., et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:11727–11734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Meyerholz D.K., Lambertz A.M., McCray P.B., Jr. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 distribution in the human respiratory tract: implications for the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am J Pathol. 2016;186:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Coutard B., Valle C., de Lamballerie X., Canard B., Seidah N.G., Decroly E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antivir Res. 2020;176:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Imai Y., Kuba K., Rao S., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kuba K., Imai Y., Rao S., et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med. 2005;11:875–879. doi: 10.1038/nm1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Seys L.J.M., Widagdo W., Verhamme F.M., et al. DPP4, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor, is upregulated in lungs of smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:45–53. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Josset L., Menachery V.D., Gralinski L.E., et al. Cell host response to infection with novel human coronavirus EMC predicts potential antivirals and important differences with SARS coronavirus. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00165-13. e00165–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Faure E., Poissy J., Goffard A., et al. Distinct immune response in two MERS-CoV-infected patients: can we go from bench to bedside? PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wu R., Wang L., Kuo H.D., et al. An update on current therapeutic drugs treating COVID-19. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2020:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s40495-020-00216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gómez-Díaz E., Jordà M., Peinado M.A., Rivero A. Epigenetics of host–pathogen interactions: the road ahead and the road behind. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Iwasaki A., Foxman E., Molony R. Early local immune defences in the respiratory tract. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:7–20. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chiu C., Openshaw P. Antiviral B cell and T cell immunity in the lungs. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:18–26. doi: 10.1038/ni.3056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li X., Fu Z., Liang H., et al. H5N1 influenza virus-specific miRNA-like small RNA increases cytokine production and mouse mortality via targeting poly(rC)-binding protein 2. Cell Res. 2018;28:157–171. doi: 10.1038/cr.2018.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sawalha A.H., Zhao M., Coit P., Lu Q. Epigenetic dysregulation of ACE2 and interferon-regulated genes might suggest increased COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in lupus patients. Clin Immunol. 2020;215:108410. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Barnes B.J., Adrover J.M., Baxter-Stoltzfus A., et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. 2020;217 doi: 10.1084/jem.20200652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Varble A., Chua M.A., Perez J.T., Manicassamy B., García-Sastre A., tenOever B.R. Engineered RNA viral synthesis of microRNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11519–11524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003115107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Umbach J.L., Yen H.L., Poon L.L., Cullen B.R. Influenza A virus expresses high levels of an unusual class of small viral leader RNAs in infected cells. mBio. 2010;1 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-10. e00204–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Aguado L.C., tenOever B. RNA virus building blocks—miRNAs not included. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.tenOever B.R. RNA viruses and the host microRNA machinery. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:169–180. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chu H., Chan J.F., Wang Y., et al. Comparative replication and immune activation profiles of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV in human lungs: an ex vivo study with implications for the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa410. Advance Access published on April 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Corley M.J., Ndhlovu L.C. DNA methylation analysis of the COVID-19 host cell receptor, angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 gene (ACE2) in the respiratory system reveal age and gender differences. Preprints. 2020 doi: 10.20944/preprints202003.0295.v1. Advance Access published on March 19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cattaneo M., Bertinato E.M., Birocchi S., et al. Pulmonary embolism or pulmonary thrombosis in COVID-19? Is the recommendation to use high-dose heparin for thromboprophylaxis justified? Thromb Haemost. 2020 doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712097. Advance Access published on April 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Benincasa G., Costa D., Infante T., Lucchese R., Donatelli F., Napoli C. Interplay between genetics and epigenetics in modulating the risk of venous thromboembolism: a new challenge for personalized therapy. Thromb Res. 2019;177:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bendib I., de Chaisemartin L., Granger V., et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are elevated in patients with pneumonia-related acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:581–591. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tang N., Bai H., Chen X., Gong J., Li D., Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1094–1099. doi: 10.1111/jth.14817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Golonka R.M., Saha P., Yeoh B.S., et al. Harnessing innate immunity to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 and ameliorate COVID-19 disease. Physiol Genomics. 2020;52:217–221. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00033.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dongwan K., Joo-Yeon L., Jeong-Sun Y., Jun Won K. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell. 2020;181:914–921. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.011. e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nehme Z., Pasquereau S., Herbein G. Control of viral infections by epigenetic-targeted therapy. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11:55. doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0654-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ivanov M., Barragan I., Ingelman-Sundberg M. Epigenetic mechanisms of importance for drug treatment. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35:384–396. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Xu Y., Liu L. Curcumin alleviates macrophage activation and lung inflammation induced by influenza virus infection through inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway. Influenza Other Respir Virus. 2017;11:457–463. doi: 10.1111/irv.12459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gordon D.E., Jang G.M., Bouhaddou M., et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583:459–468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee C.S., Yi E.H., Lee J.K., et al. Simvastatin suppresses RANTES-mediated neutrophilia in polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid-induced pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:1147–1156. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00050612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yuan S. Statins may decrease the fatality rate of Middle East respiratory syndrome infection. mBio. 2015;6 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01120-15. e01120-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Diaz A., Romero M., Vazquez T., Lechner S., Blomberg B.B., Frasca D. Metformin improves in vivo and in vitro B cell function in individuals with obesity and type-2 diabetes. Vaccine. 2017;35:2694–2700. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ruiz-Limón P., Ortega R., Arias de la Rosa I., et al. Tocilizumab improves the proatherothrombotic profile of rheumatoid arthritis patients modulating endothelial dysfunction, NETosis, and inflammation. Transl Res. 2017;183:87–103. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Müller N., Döring F., Klapper M., et al. Interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α differentially regulate lincRNA transcripts in cells of the innate immune system in vivo in human subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine. 2014;68:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Khaerunnisa S., Kurniawan H., Awaluddin R., Suhartati S., Soetjipto S. Potential inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease (Mpro) from several medicinal plant compounds by molecular docking study. Preprints. 2020 doi: 10.20944/preprints202003.0226.v1. Advance Access published on March 13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yan R., Zhang Y., Li Y., Xia L., Guo Y., Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367:1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Napoli C., Benincasa G., Schiano C., Salvatore M. Differential epigenetic factors in the prediction of cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6:239–247. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Black S., Nicolay U., Del Giudice G., Rappuoli R. Influence of statins on influenza vaccine response in elderly individuals. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:1224–1228. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mehrbod P., Omar A.R., Hair-Bejo M., Haghani A., Ideris A. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of statins against influenza. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:872370. doi: 10.1155/2014/872370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Omer S.B., Phadke V.K., Bednarczyk R.A., Chamberlain A.T., Brosseau J.L., Orenstein W.A. Impact of statins on influenza vaccine effectiveness against medically attended acute respiratory illness. J Infect Dis. 2015;213:1216–1223. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.McLean H.Q., Chow B.D., VanWormer J.J., King J.P., Belongia E.A. Effect of statin use on influenza vaccine effectiveness. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:1150–1158. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Izurieta H.S., Chillarige Y., Kelman J.A., et al. Statin use and risks of influenza-related outcomes among older adults receiving standard-dose or high-dose influenza vaccines through Medicare during 2010–2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:378–387. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.DiazGranados C.A., Dunning A.J., Kimmel M., et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:635–645. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Makris D., Manoulakas E., Komnos A., et al. Effect of pravastatin on the frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia and on intensive care unit mortality: open-label, randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2440–2446. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225742c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Douglas I., Evans S., Smeeth L. Effect of statin treatment on short term mortality after pneumonia episode: cohort study. BMJ. 2011;342:d1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Papazian L., Roch A., Charles P.E., et al. Effect of statin therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1692–1700. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Benincasa G., Cuomo O., Vasco M., et al. Epigenetic-sensitive challenges of cardio-hepatic interactions: clinical and therapeutic implications in heart failure patients. EJGD. 2020 doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001867. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fan Z., Chen L., Li J., et al. Clinical features of COVID-19-related liver damage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:1561–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Xu L., Liu J., Lu M., Yang D., Zheng X. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020;40:998–1004. doi: 10.1111/liv.14435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Gallelli L., Falcone D., Scaramuzzino M., et al. Effects of simvastatin on cell viability and proinflammatory pathways in lung adenocarcinoma cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;15:67. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yuan X., Deng Y., Guo X., Shang J., Zhu D., Liu H. Atorvastatin attenuates myocardial remodeling induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia in rats: partly involvement of TLR-4/MYD88 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;446:292–297. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Saenwongsa W., Nithichanon A., Chittaganpitch M., et al. Metformin-induced suppression of IFN-α via mTORC1 signalling following seasonal vaccination is associated with impaired antibody responses in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:3229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60213-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lindmark E., Diderholm E., Wallentin L., Siegbahn A. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. JAMA. 2001;286:2107–2113. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.17.2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Clerkin K.J., Fried J.A., Raikhelkar J., et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2020;141:1648–1655. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Napoli C., Benincasa G., Donatelli F., Ambrosio G. Precision medicine in distinct heart failure phenotypes: focus on clinical epigenetics. Am Heart J. 2020;224:113–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Devaux C.A., Rolain J.M., Colson P., Raoult D. New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Boulware D.R., Pullen M.F., Bangdiwala A.S., et al. A randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:517–525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2016638. Advance Access published on June 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Catalano R., Rocca R., Juli G., et al. A drug repurposing screening reveals a novel epigenetic activity of hydroxychloroquine. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;183:111715. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ayaz S., Crea F. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 using polycomb inhibitors as antiviral agents. Epigenomics. 2020;12:811–812. doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Arbuckle J.H., Gardina P.J., Gordon D.N., et al. Inhibitors of the histone methyltransferases EZH2/1 induce a potent antiviral state and suppress infection by diverse viral pathogens. mBio. 2017 Aug 15;8 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01141-17. e01141-17. Advance Access published on August 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Goldman J.D., Lye D.C.B., Hui D.S., et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2015301. Advance Access published on May 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Phrommintikul A., Kuanprasert S., Wongcharoen W., Kanjanavanit R., Chaiwarith R., Sukonthasarn A. Influenza vaccination reduces cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1730–1735. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Napoli C., Tritto I., Benincasa G., Mansueto G., Ambrosio G. Cardiovascular involvement during COVID-19 and clinical implications in elderly patients. A Review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020;57:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Mansueto G., Niola M., Napoli C. Can COVID 2019 disease induce a specific cardiovascular damage or it exacerbates pre-existing cardiovascular diseases? Pathol Res Pract. 2020;216:153086. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Galdiero M., Napoli C. COVID-19: do not be phobic from fever. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:938. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Zhou Y., Hou Y., Shen J., Huang Y., Martin W., Cheng F. Network-based drug repurposing for novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2. Cell Discov. 2020;6:14. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0153-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Silverman E.K., Schmidt H.H.H., Anastasiadou E., et al. Molecular networks in network medicine: development and applications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2020 doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES