Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in adults: Retrospective analysis of a case series and systematic review

Abstract

Adult undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) is an aggressive malignant tumor. As UESL is rare, the literature predominantly includes case reports, with a limited number of small case series. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presentation, treatment modalities and outcomes of this rare tumor. The present study includes a case series of adult UESL and a systematic review. A single-institution case series of adult UESL were retrospectively analyzed, and a systematic review of adult UESL was performed by searching MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Google Scholar database and the Cochrane Library. For all identified adult UESL cases, the demographic variables, treatments and survival were analyzed. Three female adult patients with UESL (median age, 21 years) were successfully treated by complete tumor resection, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of these patients, two are currently alive (follow-up, 9 and 41 months), and one died after pulmonary recurrence 17 months post-diagnosis. The present systematic review identified 108 cases of adult UESL. Among all 111 analyzed cases, the median overall and disease-free survival rates were as follows: 1-year, 72 and 67%; 3-year, 56 and 40%; and 5-year, 47 and 35%, respectively. Treatment strategies combining complete tumor resection and chemotherapy promoted improved overall and disease free survival time compared with radical tumor resection alone. The present analysis included one of the largest case series of UESL in adults, and is the first such study to present survival rates. The results of the present study confirmed that survival was improved by treatment strategies combining complete tumor resection and chemotherapy.

Introduction

Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) is an aggressive disease that accounts for <0.2% of all primary liver tumors (1). UESL was first described as a mesenchymoma by Donovan and Santulli (2) in 1946, and was subsequently termed malignant mesenchymoma by Stout (3) in 1948 before being first recognized as a distinct form of sarcoma by Stocker and Ishak (4) in 1978.

UESL predominantly develops in the childhood, with a peak incidence between 6 and 10 years of age (4); however, it also occasionally occurs in adults (5). UESL usually manifests with nonspecific clinical presentations and preoperative examination results (3–5). The majority of the relevant studies involve pediatric cases and have reported a poor prognosis, even in patients who undergo complete surgical resection of the tumor (4,5). However, patient prognosis has recently been improved using therapeutic strategies combining surgery with chemotherapy, especially with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

UESL in adults is extremely rare; to the best of our knowledge, the currently available literature includes only 108 reported cases of UESL in adult patients. Due to the low incidence of UESL, especially among adults, the majority of the literature comprises case reports, with a limited number of small case series. Therefore, limited data are available regarding the prognosis of adults patients with UESL, especially in terms of 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates. The effects of chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy on UESL in the adult population also remain unclear. To improve the prognosis of these patients, more cases and treatment experiences should be reported.

The present study aimed to analyze a single-institution retrospective case series of UESL in adults, which was one of the largest reported series to date and included the first report of overall survival in this population, as well as to perform a systematic review of the literature to investigate the presentation, treatment modalities and outcomes of this rare tumor.

Materials and methods

Retrospective analysis

A retrospective review was conducted of three cases of UELS in patients >15 years of age treated at the Center of Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between 2015 and 2018. The recorded data included the demographic (age and sex) and clinical characteristics of the patients, including the year of diagnosis, signs and symptoms at presentation, laboratory data, imaging results, tumor extension, type of surgery, tumor size, pathology reports, use of chemotherapy and interventional therapy, presence and location of recurrence, and the duration of overall survival in months. These results are presented as a descriptive analysis of a case series.

Systematic review

A systematic review of the available literature was performed using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, the Google Scholar database and the Cochrane Library to search for all published studies regarding UELS. The PRISMA guidelines were followed (http://www.prisma-statement.org/). The search terms were ‘undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma’ and ‘adult’. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English or Chinese language, human studies, adult patients (≥15 years), full-text availability and completeness of clinical data. Studies lacking primary data were excluded, but were examined to identify any relevant citations. Data extraction from relevant studies was performed to search for additional studies. The search was independently performed by two authors, and disagreements regarding study inclusion were resolved through discussion among all authors. The aforementioned clinical parameters from the cases in the included studies were evaluated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses and graphing were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were compared using the two-sided log-rank test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Retrospective analysis of a case series

Demographic and clinical characteristics

As presented in Table I, the three adult patients with UELS were female, with a mean age of 21 years at diagnosis (range, 15–25 years). Symptoms upon admission included fever, chills, nausea, vomiting and weight loss (patient A), and abdominal pain and mass (patients B and C). Laboratory analysis revealed elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP, patient A), activated partial thromboplastin time/prothrombin time (patients B and C), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, direct bilirubin, ALP and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (patient C), as well as decreased albumin, red blood cell count, hemoglobin and red blood cell-specific volume (patient C). Tumor marker levels were normal in patients A and C, whereas the level of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) was elevated outside of the normal range in patient C. In all patients, ultrasound examination and computed tomography revealed a cystic and solid mass.

Table I.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in the retrospective case series.

No.	Age, years	Sex	Symptoms	Laboratory test results	Tumor markers	US findings	CT findings
A	15	F	Fever, chill, nausea, vomiting, weight loss	↑ALP	Normal	N.A.	Cystic and solid mass
B	24	F	Abdominal pain and mass	↑PT, APTT	Normal	Cystic and solid mass	Mass with enhancement in solid parts
Ca	25	F	Abdominal pain and mass	↑PT, APTT, AST, ALT, DBIL, ALP, GGT; ↓ALB, RBC, HGB, HCT	↑PIVKA-II	N.A.	Lobulated low enhancement mass

^aPatient C was admitted to hospital for recurrent UESL 2 months after initial surgery. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; ALB, albumin; RBC, red blood cell count; HGB, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit value; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence-II; F, female; N.A., not available; US, ultrasound.

Treatment and outcome

Table II summarizes the treatments and outcomes of the three patients. One patient was admitted to the hospital for recurrent UESL. The lesions involved the right lobe in two cases and the left lobe in one case. One patient had undergone biopsy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (vincristine, cytoxan and cis-platinum) prior to admission. Two patients received preoperative transarterial chemoembolization. Surgical treatment involved right trisectionectomy in two cases, and extended left hemihepatectomy in one case. Two patients received postoperative chemotherapy (dacarbazine plus lobaplatin or doxorubicin, ifosfamide, mesna and dacarbazine). One patient underwent postoperative hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy.

Table II.

Treatment and outcome of the patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in the retrospective case series.

No.	Year of diagnosis	Tumor extension	Biopsy	Treatment before surgery	Type of surgery	Treatment after surgery	Recurrence	Outcome	OS, months
A	2016	R + L	+	VCR + CTX + PDD; TACE	Right trisectionectomy	–	No	Alive	41
B	2017	L	–	–	Extended left hemihepatectomy	DTIC + LBP; HAIC (EPI + L-OHP)	Lung	Dead	17
C	2018	R + La	–	TACE	Right trisectionectomy	AIM, AIDM	Lung, inguinal LN	Alive	9

^aPatient C was admitted to hospital for recurrent UESL 2 months after initial surgery. VCR, vincristine; CTX, cytoxan; PDD, cis-platinum; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; OS, overall survival; DTIC, dacarbazine; LBP, lobaplatin; HAIC, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy; EPI, epirubicin; L-OHP, oxaliplatin; AIM, doxorubicin, ifosfamide and mesna; AIDM, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, mesna and dacarbazine; LN, lymph node.

Two patients experienced recurrence, with one in the lung and the other in the lung plus inguinal lymph nodes. Two patients are currently alive after follow-up, one after 9 months of follow-up and the other after 41 months of follow-up. One patient succumbed to pulmonary recurrence at 17 months.

Pathological characteristics

In one case, the tumor size was <10 cm; in the other two cases, the tumor size was >20 cm. The tumor in one case exhibited visible capsule infiltration and tumor thrombus (portal vein and hepatic vein). Immunohistochemical results revealed expression of the cytokeratin antibody AE1/AE3, the melanoma antibody HMB45 and DESMIN in one case; vimentin, CD31 and periodic acid-schiff stain (PAS) positive in two cases; and CD34 and smooth muscle actin in all three cases. The rate of Ki-67 expression was >60% in all cases. The results are presented in Table III.

Table III.

Pathological characteristics of the patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in the retrospective case series.

No.	Size, cm	Infiltration of capsule	Tumor thrombus	Necrosis, %	AE1/AE3	Vimentin	HMB45	CD31	CD34	KI-67	SMA	DESMIN	PAS
A	9×7×8	–	–	100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	+	+	70%+	+	+	N.A.
B	20×15×12.5	+	+	N.A.	+	+	N.A.	N.A.	+	60%+	+	–	+
C	22×19×10	–	–	N.A.	–	+	+	+	+	60%+	+	–	+

AE1/AE3, cytokeratin antibody; HMB45, melanoma antibody; SMA, smooth muscle actin; PAS, periodic acid-schiff stain; DESMIN, a protein marker of muscle; N.A., not available.

Systematic literature review

Demographic data

The literature search identified 108 reported adult cases of UESL. Of these cases, 75 were reported and summarized by Pachera et al (6) and Chen et al (7) between 1955 and 2011. An additional 33 cases were reported between 2011 and 2019 (Table IV) (8–36). Thus, including the present case series, a total of 111 adult cases of UESL have been reported to date. Among all cases, the median age was 29 years (range, 15–86 years), and the peak incidence was between the ages of 15 and 24 years (Fig. 1). Sex was reported for 107 patients; of these, 44 (41%) were men and 63 (59%) were women, with a male: Female ratio of 1:1.4 (Table IV).

Table IV.

New cases of undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver between 2011 and 2019 in the literature.

Author, year	Age, years	Sex	Site	Biopsy	Treatment before surgery	Surgery	Treatment after surgery	Recurrence (treatment)	Outcome	OS, mos	(Refs.)
Gerson et al, 2019	71	M	L	–	–	Left lobectomy	–	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	(8)
Capozza et al, 2019	20	F	Rc	–	–	Right hepatectomy	VAIA	No	Alive	177	(9)
Capozza et al, 2019	17	M	R	+	–	Right hepatectomy	IFO + VCR + ACTD	No	Alive	20	(9)
Esteban et al, 2018	53	F	Ra	+	Radiotherapy	Not performed	–	–	DOD	N.A.	(10)
Esteban et al, 2018	35	F	R+L	–	–	Extended right hepatectomy	–	LR in 24 mos (ADR+IFO)	Alive	60	(10)
Pandit et al, 2019	34	M	R+Lb	–	–	Mass enucleation	–	No	Alive	6	(11)
Pandit et al, 2019	29	F	R	+	–	Radical resection	–	LR, peritonea in 4 mos	DOD	8	(12)
Pinamonti et al, 2018	60	F	R	–	–	Segmentectomy	VCR + ACTD + CTX	No	Alive	30	(13)
Beksac et al, 2018	26	F	L	+	–	Nonanatomic resection	PTX + CDDP + IFO	No	Alive	72	(14)
Khan et al, 2017	21	M	R	+	IFO + ADR	LTx	–	No	Alive	18	(15)
Mori et al, 2017	65	F	R+L	–	–	Right trisectionectomy	–	LR in 18 mos (resection)	Alive	26	(16)
Lee et al, 2016	51	M	R	–	–	Right hemihepatectomy	–	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	(17)
Giakoustidis et al, 2016	29	F	R+L	+	PVE	Right trisectionectomy	CTX + CDDP + ADR	1st LR in 12 mos (CTX + CDDP + ADR), 2nd LR and spine metastasis	DOD	28	(18)
Treitl et al, 2016	30	M	L	+	–	Left hepatectomy	ADR + IFO	No	Alive	3	(19)
Zanwar et al, 2017	20	M	R	+	IVA	Right hepatectomy	IVA	No	Alive	24	(20)
Masuda et al, 2015	52	F	R+L	–	–	Right trisectionectomy	–	LR in 12/19/25/35/42/47 mos (resections and RFA); bone metastases and TT in azygos vein	DOD	62	(21)
Masuda et al, 2015	53	F	L+R	–	–	Extended left hepatectomy	–	LR in 4/14 mos (resections and RFA)	Alive	65	(21)
Kallam et al, 2015	47	M	L	–	–	Left lobectomy (R1)	–	Lung metastases in 2 mos (ADR+ IFO, GEM+ DXT)	Death (pneumonia)	8	(22)
Xie et al, 2014	39	M	R	+	–	Tumor resection	–	LR in 2 mos	Alive	2	(23)
Cao et al, 2014	37	M	L	–	–	Lobectomy	–	LR in 19 mos (TACE); Lung and mediastinum LN metastasis in 24 mos	DOD	34	(24)
Cao et al, 2014	24	F	R	–	–	Lobectomy	MAID	LR in 4 mos (N.A.)	Alive	24	(24)
Hanafiah et al, 2014	20	M	R+L	+	–	Extended right hepatectomy	–	LR in 6 mos (ADM)	Alive	6	(25)
Hong et al, 2014	67	M	R	–	–	Segmentectomy	–	LR in 6 mos (MAID)	Death (sepsis)	8	(26)
Ismail et al, 2013	16	F	R+L	+	CAV/ETIF/IF + ADR	Right extended hemihepatectomy	IVADO, VP-16/CDDP, VRB/CTX	No	Alive	50	(27)
Jia et al, 2013	46	F	R	–	–	Segmentectomy	–	LR in 6 mos	DOD	12	(28)
Hu et al, 2012	19	F	R	–	–	Right hemihepatectomy	–	No	Alive	40	(29)
Varol et al, 2012	33	F	L	+	–	Not performed	–	–	DOD	N.A.	(30)
Dhanasekaran et al, 2012	54	M	L	+	ADR+ IFO, DTIC; TACE	LTx	–	No	Alive	167	(31)
Lightfoot et al, 2012	78	F	R	–	–	Partial right hepatectomy	–	No	Alive	6	(32)
Noguchi et al, 2012	27	F	R	–	–	Right trisectionectomy	VADRCA+ CDDP, MCVC; radiotheraphy	No	Alive	60	(33)
Tanaka et al, 2012	51	F	R	–	–	Segmentectomy	–	LR, lung and spine metastasis in 48 mos	DOD	60	(34)
Tucker et al, 2012	74	F	L	–	–	Left hepatectomy	–	No	Alive	9	(35)
Kim et al, 2011	47	F	L	–	–	Left lateral sectionectomy	MAID	Lumbar spine in 2 years (radiotheraphy)	DOD	48	(36)

^aMultifocal, with metastasis in left auricular and right costal arch.

^bTumor ruptured prior to surgery, with thrombus in the right atrium.

^cTumor ruptured prior to surgery. CDDP, cisplatin; PTX, taxol; ADR, adriamycin; IFO, ifosfamide; DTIC, dacarbazine; ACTD, actinomycin D; CTX, cyclophosphamide; VCR, vincristine; GEM, gemcitabine; DXT, docetaxel; VRB, vinorelbina; VP-16, etoposide; MAID, mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine; VADRCA, vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and actinomycin D; CAV, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and vincristine; MCVC, ranimustine, carboplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide; IVA, ifosfamide, vincristine and adriamycin; IVADO, ifosfamide, vincristine, actinomycin D and adriamycin; ETIF, epirubicin, taxotere, irinotecan and 5-fluorourcil; IF, irinotecan and 5-fluorourcil; LTx, liver transplantation; LR, local recurrence; PVE, portal vein embolization; TT, tumor thrombosis; LN, lymph node; DOD, died of disease; N.A., not available; mos, months.

Figure 1.

Age distribution of patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver.

Treatment and outcome

Complete treatment and survival data were available for 83 patients. Among these patients, the median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2 days to 204 months), and median survival was 48 months (range, 2 days to 204 months). Among all the 83 patients, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 72, 56 and 47%, respectively (Fig. 2A), and the 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 67, 40 and 35%, respectively (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meyer survival curves of patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver. (A) Overall survival. (B) DFS. DFS, disease-free survival.

Patients who underwent complete tumor resection with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly higher survival rates compared with those in patients who underwent surgery alone. For patients treated with chemotherapy plus surgery vs. surgery alone, the overall survival rates were as follows: 1-year, 93% vs. 65%; 3-year, 80% vs. 40%; and 5-year, 63% vs. 34% (P=0.0040; Fig. 3A). The corresponding disease-free survival rates were as follows: 1-year, 86% vs. 47%; 3-year, 58% vs. 19%; and 5-year, 58% vs. 13% (P=0.0001; Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meyer survival curves of patients with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver. (A) Overall survival with and without chemotherapy. (B) DFS with and without chemotherapy. DFS, disease-free survival.

Discussion

In the present study, one of largest case series of adult UESL to date was analyzed. The literature review confirmed that a higher survival rate was associated with treatment strategies combining complete tumor resection and chemotherapy compared with radical tumor resection alone. To the best of our knowledge, 111 adult cases of UESL have been reported to date, including the present case series. The present analysis is the first to include a thorough 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate analysis in this population.

UESL is rare and usually occurs in children; its incidence decreases with increasing age, with peak incidence occurring between the ages of 6 and 10 years (3,5). Among adult patients, the present study identified another peak between the ages of 15 and 24 years. It is possible that UESL is similar to embryonal tumors, and thus may predominantly occur in young adults. In addition, a female preponderance was observed in the present systematic review, with a male: Female ratio of 1:1.4. In the present case series, all three patients were female, and the median age at diagnosis was 21 years (range, 15–25 years).

UESL exhibits a nonspecific clinical presentation. The most common symptoms are right upper quadrant abdominal pain and mass. Other symptoms include vomiting, diarrhea, weight loss, fever, and jaundice (3,6,7). Among the cases included in the present retrospective analysis, the symptoms upon admission were fever, chills, nausea, vomiting and weight loss in one patient, and abdominal pain and mass in the other two patients. Laboratory findings, including liver function and tumor markers, are usually normal at the time of UESL presentation (6,7). Among the present cases, one patient exhibited obviously altered liver function, and tumor markers, including α-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen (CA)199 and CA125, were negative in all patients. Only one of the three patients exhibited elevated PIVKA-II. In the ultrasound examination and CT scans, UESL often presents as a large solid or cystic mass, with enhancement in the solid parts (33,37). This is similar to the cases in the present study.

From its first recognition as a unique clinicopathologic entity in 1978 until the early 1990s, UESL has been associated with a poor prognosis, even in patients who underwent complete surgical resection of the tumor (1,2,37). Due to its low incidence, especially among adults, UESL survival data are mainly from case reports or small case series of childhood patients. In the initial report by Stocker and Ishak (4), the median survival was <1 year, and only 19% (6/31) of the reported patients were alive and disease-free after resection for the median follow-up of 9 months (range, 2–52 months). Among the 40 patients reported in the literature between 1950 and 1988, 47.5% died after a mean duration of 11.9 months, 15.0% survived with disease, and 37.5% were alive and disease-free (average, 37.5 months) (38).

In the recent two decades, an increasing number of long-term survivors have been reported. These cases have mainly included children who underwent surgical tumor resection, especially with postoperative chemotherapy (39–42). In a review of 68 adult patients between 1995 and 2007, Lenze et al (5) observed a median survival of 29 months among all patients, and that patients who underwent complete tumor resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly improved survival compared with that of patients who underwent surgery alone. Similarly, the present results demonstrated significantly improved survival among patients treated with complete tumor resection plus adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients treated with surgery alone. In addition, in pediatric cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the tumor size and stage, making complete surgical resection possible (25,42,43). However, due to insufficient data, the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in adult patients with UESL and its influence on survival cannot be currently assessed.

The present findings were limited by the retrospective study design and the low number of cases. The rarity of UESL, especially in adults, precludes large prospective single-institution studies. In addition, the effects of neoadjuvant treatment of UESL could not be evaluated in this study due to the limited relevant data in adult patients. However, this may be confirmed as a useful method in the future, based on the results of studies on pediatric UESL.

In conclusion, the present study reports one of largest case series of adult UESL to date. The results of our systematic literature review were the first to report the survival rates, which confirmed significantly improved survival following treatment with complete tumor resection plus chemotherapy compared with radical tumor resection alone. In the future, multi-institutional or global collaborative studies may represent the best approach to investigating adult UESL and standardizing its treatment.

Glossary

Abbreviations

UESL

undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

APTT

activated partial thromboplastin time

PT

prothrombin time

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

DBIL

direct bilirubin

GGT

γ-glutamyl transpeptidase

ALB

albumin

RBC

red blood cell

HGB

hemoglobin

HCT

red blood cell specific volume

PIVKA-II

protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II

HAIC

hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy

CA

carbohydrate antigen

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

BS and LG conceived and designed the study. BS, XH and SY performed the bioinformatics analysis and wrote the initial manuscript. LC, ZY and LG were involved in the conception of the study and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.