Correction to: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 15, 19 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1496-z
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been informed that references from Table 1 did not match the list. This Correction provides the corrected table with the missing references.
Table 1.
Characteristic of the included studies
| Study | Year | Language | Country | Age range (mean) | Groups | n | Years of onset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akgul [25] | 2016 | English | Turkey | 17.6 ± 1.8 | Reconstruction nail | 5 | September 2007 to June 2013 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 10 | ||||||
| Boese [26] | 2016 | English | Germany | 18.2 ± 2.1 | Reconstruction nail | 8 | October 2008 to June 2010 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 9 | ||||||
| Genest [27] | 2018 | English | Germany | 54.7 ± 12.1 | Reconstruction nail | 15 | June 2010 to July 2016 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 15 | ||||||
| Jiang [28] | 2015 | English | China | 62.4 ± 18.7 | Reconstruction nail | 233 | January 2009 to October 2014 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 233 | ||||||
| Kovala k [29] | 2017 | English | Turkey | 74.1 ± 4.1 | Reconstruction nail | 13 | January 2009 to January 2015 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 18 | ||||||
| Maranho [20] | 2018 | English | America | 22.3 ± 1.7 | Reconstruction nail | 53 | May 2000 to March 2014 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 49 | ||||||
| Oh [21] | 2017 | English | Japan | 78.2 ± 7 | Reconstruction nail | 10 | August 2015 to February 2017 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 11 | ||||||
| Ripamonti [22] | 2014 | English | Italy | 68.4 ± 9.5 | Reconstruction nail | 38 | April 2000 to March 2010 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 166 | ||||||
| Sangeux [23] | 2015 | English | Australia | 56.7 ± 2.3 | Reconstruction nail | 11 | February 2002 to June 2010 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 11 | ||||||
| Yamauchi [24] | 2016 | English | Japan | 72.1 ± 11.2 | Reconstruction nail | 101 | January 2010 to January 2012 |
| Hollow screw+plate | 99 |
Correct:
[25]. Akgül, T., et al., Double intertrochanteric osteotomy for trochanteric overgrowth and a short femoral neck in adolescents. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong), 2016. 24(3): p. 387–391.
[26]. Boese, C.K., et al., The Modified Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle: Age- and Sex-Dependent Reference Values and Reliability Analysis. BioMed Research International, 2016. 2016: p. 1–7.
[27]. Genest, F. and L. Seefried, Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia—not atypical at all. Osteoporosis International, 2018. 29(8): p. 1815–1825.
[28]. Jiang, N., et al., Femoral Version, Neck-Shaft Angle, and Acetabular Anteversion in Chinese Han Population. Medicine, 2015. 94(21): p. e891.
[29]. Emrah Kovalaka, C.E.T.A., Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2017(421): p. 1–6.
Footnotes
Yao Lu, Yakang Wang and Zhe Song contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Yang Zhao, Email: zy881027@126.com.
Teng Ma, Email: gukemt@163.com.
Reference
- 1.Lu, et al. J Orthopaedic Surg Res. 2020;15:19. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1496-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
