Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2020 Apr 3;99(14):e19613. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019613

Physical activity is associated with lower health care costs among Taiwanese individuals with diabetes mellitus

Chun-Lang Su a,b,c, Lee Wang a, Chien-Chang Ho e,g, Oswald Ndi Nfor a, Shu-Yi Hsu a, Chun-Te Lee b,d, Pei-Chieh Ko a, Yi-Tien Lin f, Yung-Po Liaw a,h,
Editor: Gunjan Arora
PMCID: PMC7440055  PMID: 32243386

Abstract

The economic burden of diabetes has increased over time with disease severity. Previous publications investigating the effects of physical activity (PA) on medical costs have made use of small sample sizes. We assessed the relationship between PA and 1-year medical expenditure among Taiwanese patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Data were recruited from three governmental databases, including the 2012 adult preventive health service database. Participants were grouped as inactive (no exercise), insufficiently active (exercise < 150 minutes/week), and sufficiently active (exercise >150 minutes/week) individuals. Patients were stratified according to age and Charlson score. Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine β-coefficients and their P values.

Overall, 218,960 individuals were identified with diabetes. The prevalence of the disease was 13.1% among sufficiently active, 35% among insufficiently active, and 51.9% among physically inactive adults. In general, patients who had exercise >150 minutes/week had lower health care spending (i.e., US$ 755.83) followed by those who had less than 150 minutes/week (US$ 880.08) when compared with inactive patients (P < .0001). Moreover, health care costs derived from outpatient or inpatient care were lower for sufficiently active than inactive participants (P < .0001).

Compared with being sedentary, PA was associated with lower health care costs of Taiwanese adults with diabetes mellitus.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, exercise, health care costs, physical activity

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) remains a major public health issue. The global prevalence was predicted at 2.8% in 2000 and 4.4% in 2030.[24] The economic burden of diabetes has increased over time with disease severity.[28] It is becoming more expensive to treat the disease and its related complications.[8] The estimated cost of DM in the United States grew from $130 billion in 2002 to $245 billion in 2012.[9,15] In the United Kingdom, around 10% of the total health care expenditure was used for diabetic care.[26] In Taiwan, inpatient expenditure for DM increased from 19.3% in 2000 to 26.4% in 2009.[33] Reducing the prevalence of DM could improve health-related quality of life and can also lower economic or health care spending.

Physical inactivity has adverse effects on health and is directly responsible for the high cost of medication.[18] Of the total health care cost in Canada, costs associated with physical inactivity and obesity represented 2.6% and 2.2%, respectively.[10] Findings from another study showed that inactive compared with active Brazilians were associated with a higher health care cost (US$241.06 vs US$94.11). Moreover, expenditures related to DM were significantly higher in the inactive group (US$65.14 vs US$14.68).

According to Bruna and his team, prevention of higher health care costs associated with diseases including DM depends essentially on the promotion of healthy habits.[19] Meeting the recommended levels of physical activity (PA, i.e., 150 minutes/week)[21] is essential for mitigating health care costs. Results from a previous study showed that participants with and without established cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) who were engaged in moderate-vigorous physical activity registered lower health care costs and resource utilization.[36] Regular PA has been inversely associated with the risk of DM.[27] Findings from a meta-analysis showed that habitual leisure-time PA decreased glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level and lowered the health care expenditure of patients with DM.[2] The effects are similar to those of dietary, drug, and insulin treatments.[34] According to investigations by Trust for America's Health, only putting $10 per person per year into improving programs about physical inactivity, poor nutrition, and smoking will save more than $16 billion medical costs in 5 years.[4] Moreover, a shred of sound scientific evidence is needed to stimulate health awareness among citizens. Previous studies to investigate the effects of PA on medical costs have made use of small sample sizes. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the relationship between PA and medical expenditures in patients with DM using multiple national databases.

2. Methods

Data used in this study were collected from 3 national databases that were linked using personal identification numbers. Data on DM were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Data on physical exercise were obtained from the National Adult Preventive Medical Services Database, while mortality data were obtained from the Death Registry Database. All personal information contained in the databases was de-identified for privacy reasons. The central regional research ethics committee of Taiwan (CRREC-104-015) approved this study.

The National Health Insurance (NHI) was set up in 1995 to gather information on the health of Taiwan citizens. The coverage rate is currently about 99%. The Health Promotion Administration (HPA) launched free preventive care services for adults in 1996. Services are offered free of charge once every 3 years to people aged 40 to 64 years and once every year to those over the age of 65. About 1.704 million individuals are reported to have received the services in 2008. The medical services include physical examination, blood, and urine tests, as well as health consultations.[7,25]

We assessed historical data of 1,572,930 male and female participants aged 40 years and older who were engaged in adult preventive health services in 2012. Of these participants, 249,114 persons were identified with DM. However, patients who died before 2013 (n = 3553) and those with incomplete information (n = 26,601) were excluded. Included in the final analysis were 218,960 patients. DM was diagnosed based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 250. Patients were defined as those who had at least 2 ambulatory claims or 1 inpatient claim in 2011. PA was measured based on self-report and was categorized as no exercise (physically inactive), exercise less than 150 minutes per week (insufficiently active), and exercise more than 150 minutes per week (sufficiently active) within the last 3 months. Sociodemographic characteristics included age, gender, body mass index (BMI) measured in kg/m2, glucose levels (mg/dL), medical expenditure, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (≤2, 3–4, ≥5),[22] smoking (never, occasional, and frequent), drinking (never, occasional, and frequent), betel nut use (never, occasional, and frequent), total cholesterol (mg/dL), triglycerides (mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein (mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein (mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (mm Hg), and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg). Betel nut was relevant in the analysis because of its previously reported associations with T2DM in Taiwan.[11,32] It is common in South East Asia[3] and its major alkaloid is believed to interfere with insulin-induced glucose uptake.[14] Medical expenditure included the total amount [in American Dollars (US$)] of each disbursement (inpatient and outpatient care service) in 2013. The total annual costs were calculated by finding the sum of all outpatient and inpatient services and medical prescriptions.

2.1. Statistical analysis

A Chi-square test was used for the categorical variables. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the β-coefficients and their P values. Comparisons of continuous data among the 3 groups (i.e., physically inactive, insufficiently active, and sufficiently active groups) were done using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test. This study used SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary) as a statistical tool and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

There were 218,960 eligible participants in this study (Table 1). Of the general participants, 51.9% were physically inactive, 35% were insufficiently active, and 13.1% were sufficiently active. As summarized in Table 1, health care cost derived from outpatient or inpatient care was significantly lower among sufficiently active than inactive participants (P < .0001). The total annual health care cost was significantly lower among sufficiently active (US$755.83) and inadequately active (US$880.08) adults (P < .0001) compared with the inactive group (US$1200.01). Lower levels of glucose and higher concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were found among sufficiently active adults when compared with the inactive and insufficiently active groups (P < .0001).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients with DM stratified by physical activity level.

3.

Tables 2 and 3 summarize the health care costs attributable to DM in male and female patients according to age, Charlson score, and different levels of PA. No significant differences in health care costs were observed in male and female patients aged 40 to 54 years no matter their CCI score and PA level. Compared with the inactive group, sufficiently and insufficiently active men 55 to 69 years old with CCI score ≥5 were associated with a lower annual health care cost by US$864.89 (β = -864.89, P = .027) and US$768.20 (β = -768.20, P = .004), respectively. Besides, CCI score 3 to 4 was also associated with a lower health care cost by US$105.27 among insufficiently active adults and US$ 223.56 among sufficiently active adults even though it was not significant. Moreover, the lower health care cost in men ≥70 years with CCI score 3 to 4 was by US$191.74 (β = -191.74, P = .025) among insufficiently active adults, and US$240.66 (β = -240.66, P = .030) among sufficiently active adults, while those with score ≥5 was by US$ 364.49 (β = -364.49, P = .045) and US$395.98 (β = -395.98, P = .123), respectively.

Table 2.

Health care expenditures of male patients based on physical activity, age, and Charlson score.

3.

Table 3.

Health care expenditures of female patients based on physical activity, age, and Charlson score.

3.

No significant differences in health care costs were observed in women belonging to the 40 to 54 and 55 to 69 age category. Compared with inactive women ≥70 years old, sufficiently active women were associated with a lower health care cost even though the results were significant only for CCI score ≤2 (β = -98.18, P = .025).

4. Discussion

This is the first cross-sectional study to estimate the annual health care spending associated with DM among active and inactive Taiwanese adults. Our analysis indicated that sufficiently active diabetic patients (i.e., those who exercised more than 150 minutes per week) were associated with lower health care costs (i.e., US$755.83) followed by insufficiently active patients (US$880.08) when compared with their inactive counterparts (US$1200.01). Associations between PA and lower costs linked to DM have also been reported in Western populations.[9,12] Findings from another study suggested that inactive individuals had an 11.1% increase in aggregate health care expenditure compared with an active group.[17] Our findings also share a number of similarities with recent findings, where higher fitness was associated with lower health care costs, which was more obvious among patients with diabetes.[30] That is, after adjusting for potential variables, the mean annual costs per patient over an 8-year period were found to be US$32178 lower among patients in the highest-fit than those in the least-fit category. In another study to assess a 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention and metformin for diabetes prevention, the Diabetes Prevention Program Research group observed a 17% relative reduction in inpatient health care costs in the lifestyle intervention group.[16]

The prevalence of DM in Taiwan is from 4.9% to 9.2%.[1] We observed that the prevalence of the disease among inactive participants was relatively high (i.e., 51.9%). On the basis of findings from previous studies, physical inactivity is a potentially important risk factor for diabetes.[13,31,29] It appears to have a direct effect on diabetes risk[31] and also serves as a predictor of mortality in men with DM.[29] According to reports by the International Diabetes Federation, over 1,958,000 cases (10.9%) of diabetes were reported among Taiwanese adults in 2017. The disease prevalence is likely to increase in the coming years considering that it is the fastest-growing chronic disease in the world.[5] However, our findings suggest that about 330 to 660 million USD (10–20 billion NTD) could be saved annually if Taiwanese adults with DM could adopt a more active lifestyle.

The percentage of adults with diabetes increase with age,[6] as does the risk of comorbidity. Besides, the cost of diabetes is known to be higher for patients with comorbid illness.[23] In light of this, our stratified analysis was based on age (40–54, 55–69, ≥70 years) and CCI score (≤2, 3–4, ≥5). It is reasonable for elderly patients with more comorbidities to experience a rise in medical expenditure.[20] On the basis of stratification by PA, we found that the effect of comorbidity on health care costs associated with DM was significant only in the ≥70 and 55 to 69 age categories of men. That is, compared with the inactive group, 55 to 69-year-old sufficiently and insufficiently active men with CCI score ≥5 were associated with a lower annual health care cost by US$864.89 and US$768.20, respectively. Likewise, the lower costs were US$240.66 and US$191.74 among sufficiently active and insufficiently active men ≥70 years old with CCI score 3 to 4.

Some limitations of our study are worth noting. First, the study sample is limited to patients who were engaged in adult preventive health services that are restricted to adults aged 40 years and older. Therefore, we could not determine medical costs for Taiwanese patients younger than 40. Second, medical spending of DM patients with both microvascular and macrovascular complications is 4 times higher than those without complication.[35] Such information was not available in our databases. However, we adjusted for potential variables and costs were stratified based on Charlson comorbidity scores. Of note, including covariates in the model is not a cure for selection bias or reverse causality, for both forms of bias may be present in our data. Therefore, our results may not generalize to other populations. Third, medical costs may have been underestimated, as they did not include self-paid items or health supplements. Fourth, databases used in our study provided no information about activity patterns. Moreover, the amount of PA, transportation cost, and occupational activities may have been overestimated.

5. Conclusion

Compared with being sedentary, PA even below recommended levels was associated with lower health care expenditures of Taiwanese adults with type 2 DM. These findings highlight the importance of habitual PA in minimizing the burden imposed by diabetes. Future studies with both young and old adults will be necessary to validate our findings in other populations globally.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Chun-Lang Su, Pei-Chieh Ko, Chien-Chang Ho, Yi-Tien Lin, Shu-Yi Hsu

Formal analysis: Shu-Yi Hsu, Pei-Chieh Ko

Methodology: Lee Wang, Chien-Chang Ho, Chun-Te Lee, Oswald Ndi Nfor, Yung-Po Liaw

Resources: Yung-Po Liaw

Supervision: Yung-Po Liaw

Writing – original draft: Chun-Lang Su, Oswald Ndi Nfor

Writing – review & editing: Yi-Tien Lin, Chien-Chang Ho, Chun-Lang Su, Chun-Te Lee, Oswald Ndi, Nfor, Lee Wang

Footnotes

Abbreviations: β = beta-coefficient, ANOVA = analysis of variance, BMI = body mass index, CVD = cardiovascular diseases, HPA = Health Promotion Administration, ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases, MOST = Ministry of Science and Technology, NHIRD = National Health Insurance Research Database, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code, PA = physical activity, T2DM = type-2 diabetes mellitus,.

How to cite this article: Su CL, Wang L, Ho CC, Nfor ON, Hsu SY, Lee CT, Ko PC, Lin YT, Liaw YP. Physical activity is associated with lower healthcare costs among taiwanese individuals with diabetes mellitus. Medicine. 2020;99:14(e19613).

This work was supported by funds from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104–2420-H-040–001, MOST 104–2119-H-040–002, MOST 105–2627-H-040–002, and MOST 106–2627-H-040–002). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • [1].Chang C, Lu F, Yang YC, et al. Epidemiologic study of type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000;50: suppl 2: S49–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Pai L-W, Li T-C, Hwu Y-J, et al. The effectiveness of regular leisure-time physical activities on long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;113:77–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Rooney DF. Betel Chewing in South-East Asia. Lyon: centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Trust for America's Health, Levi J, Segal LM, Juliano C. Prevention for a Healthier America: Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings, Stronger Communities. Issue Report July 2008. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ting M-K, Liao P-J, Wu I-W, et al. Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus occurrence using three-dimensional anthropometric body surface scanning measurements: a prospective cohort study. J Diabetes Res 2018;2018:6742384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Control CfD, Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kung PT, Tsai WC, Li YH. Determining factors for utilization of preventive health services among adults with disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil 2012;33:205–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Domeikienė A, Vaivadaitė J, Ivanauskienė R, et al. Direct cost of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus healthcare and its complications in Lithuania. Medicina 2014;50:54–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Codogno JS, Fernandes RA, Sarti FM, et al. The burden of physical activity on type 2 diabetes public healthcare expenditures among adults: a retrospective study. BMC Public health 2011;11:275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I. The economic costs associated with physical inactivity and obesity in Canada: an update. Can J Appl Physiol 2004;29:90–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Tseng C-H. Betel nut chewing and incidence of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwan. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Mendez-Hernandez P, Dosamantes-Carrasco D, Siani C, et al. A workplace physical activity program at a public university in Mexico can reduce medical costs associated with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Salud Publica Mex 2012;54:20–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Thibault V, Bélanger M, LeBlanc E, et al. Factors that could explain the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes among adults in a Canadian province: a critical review and analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2016;8:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Nabrinsky E, Hasan B, Asif T, et al. Betel nut use and hyperglycemia. Marshall J Med 2017;3:8. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Association AD. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Pratt M, et al. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57:315–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Bueno DR, Marucci MdFN, Codogno JS, et al. The costs of physical inactivity in the world: a general review. Cien Saude Colet 2016;21:1001–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Camilo Turi B, Luiz Monteiro H, Araújo Fernandes R, et al. The impact of physical activity on mitigation of health care costs related to diabetes mellitus: findings from developed and developing settings. Curr Diabetes Rev 2016;12:307–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, et al. Health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2011;68:387–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Füzéki E, Banzer W. Physical activity recommendations for health and beyond in currently inactive populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1042–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Lin P-J, Pope E, Zhou FL. Comorbidity type and health care costs in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective claims database analysis. Diabetes Ther 2018;9:1907–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes care 2004;27:1047–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Chen CS, Peng YI, Lee PC, et al. The effectiveness of preventive care at reducing curative care risk for the Taiwanese elderly under National Health Insurance. Health Policy 2015;119:787–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, et al. Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med 2012;29:855–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Aune D, Norat T, Leitzmann M, et al. Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:529–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Seuring T, Archangelidi O, Suhrcke M. The economic costs of type 2 diabetes: a global systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics 2015;33:811–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Wei M, Gibbons LW, Kampert JB, et al. Low cardiorespiratory fitness and physical inactivity as predictors of mortality in men with type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:605–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Myers J, e Silva CGdS, Doom R, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and health care costs in diabetes: the Veterans Exercise Testing Study. Am J Med 2019;132:1084–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Oggioni C, Lara J, Wells J, et al. Shifts in population dietary patterns and physical inactivity as determinants of global trends in the prevalence of diabetes: an ecological analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014;24:1105–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Tung T-H, Chiu Y-H, Chen L-S, et al. A population-based study of the association between areca nut chewing and type 2 diabetes mellitus in men (Keelung Community-based Integrated Screening programme No. 2). Diabetologia 2004;47:1776–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Chang TJ, Jiang YD, Chang CH, et al. Accountability, utilization and providers for diabetes management in Taiwan, 2000-2009: an analysis of the National Health Insurance database. J Formos Med Assoc 2012;111:605–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Snowling NJ, Hopkins WG. Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2518–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Chang T-J, Jiang Y-D, Chang C-H, et al. Accountability, utilization and providers for diabetes management in Taiwan, 2000-2009: an analysis of the National Health Insurance database. J Formos Med Assoc 2012;111:605–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Valero-Elizondo J, Salami JA, Osondu CU, et al. Economic impact of moderate-vigorous physical activity among those with and without established cardiovascular disease: 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Circulation 2016;133: suppl 1: A13–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES