Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2020 Mar 13;99(11):e19087. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019087

Prevalence and correlation of anxiety and depression on the prognosis of postoperative non-small-cell lung cancer patients in North China

Xuan Huang 1, Tian-Ze Zhang 1, Guang-Hua Li 1, Lei Liu 1, Guang-Quan Xu 1,
Editor: Weimin Guo1
PMCID: PMC7440182  PMID: 32176035

Abstract

Identify the prevalence of postoperative anxiety and depression as well as their correlations with clinical features and survival profiles in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent resection.

Four hundred NSCLC patients who underwent resection were recruited, and their anxiety and depression were assessed by hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) at discharge after surgery. Besides, 480 healthy controls (HCs) were also enrolled and assessed by HADS.

The HADS-Anxiety score of NSCLC patients (7.8 ± 3.9) was greatly higher than that of HCs (4.8 ± 2.7), and the anxiety prevalence of NSCLC patients (49.6%) were dramatically increased compared with HCs (13.8%). Furthermore, the HADS-Depression score (7.2 ± 3.6) of NSCLC patients was considerably increased compared with HCs (4.2 ± 2.6), and the depression prevalence of NSCLC patients (38.3%) was significantly raised compared with HCs (10.0%). Besides, anxiety correlated with gender, marital status, hypertension, diabetes, pathological differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and carcinoembryonic antigen level, meanwhile, depression correlated with marital status, employment status before surgery, diabetes, pathological differentiation, and TNM stage in NSCLC patients. Additionally, the anxiety and depression predicted shorter disease-free survival in NSCLC patients. And the anxiety predicted worse overall survival (OS), while no association of depression with OS was observed in NSCLC patients.

Post-operative anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and implicated in the ongoing care and prognosis prediction in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.

Keywords: anxiety, depression, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, prognosis, risk factors

1. Introduction

Lung cancer, one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies, is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide with 2.1 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths estimated in 2018 based on the recent global cancer statistics.[1,2] Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancers, and the majority of patients are diagnosed as locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.[1,3] The clinical outcome of NSCLC has been improved thanks to the development and advancement in target therapies and immunotherapy during the last decade.[4] However, disease-related symptoms (such as coughing, chest pain, and hemoptysis) and aggressive treatments (such as chemotherapy and surgery) lead to physical deformities, body dysfunction, multiple side-effects, which further accelerate the occurrence and progression of psychological distress especially anxiety and depression.[5]

Anxiety and depression are serious and recurrent psychological disorders.[6] Anxiety is characterized by persistent and excessive unpleasant feelings of threat or potential harm, often accompanied by apprehension, worry, poor concentration, muscular tension, palpitations, and sweating.[7] As for depression, it is marked by low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in hobbies and activities, decreased energy, difficulties in concentrating or making decisions, appetite and sleep disturbance, psychomotor disturbances, and suicidal attempts.[8] Both anxiety and depression may decrease patients’ capability to tolerate the illness burden and aggressive treatment regimens, which extends periods of hospitalization, worsens quality of life and elevates mortality rates.[9]

Existing studies display that demographic factors, social factors, health behaviors, and cancer-related variables manifest anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients.[5,10] For instance, cancer stage, cancer type, gender, and age correlate with depression in lung cancer patients.[5] Another study illustrates that feminine gender is associated with increased risks of anxiety and depression in NSCLC patients.[10] Nonetheless, information on factors for impacting the prevalence of anxiety and depression in NSCLC patients who underwent resection is limited. Besides, it is evident that anxiety and depression result in declined quality of life, prolonged length of hospitalization and even poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.[10,11] Based on these perceptions, we hypothesized that anxiety and depression might possess negative effect on prognosis in NSCLC patients who underwent resection as well, but no related study has been reported yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of postoperative anxiety/depression, and their correlations with clinical features as well as survival profile in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

From July 2013 to June 2016, 480 NSCLC patients who underwent resection in our hospital were consecutively enrolled in this study. Patients were included if they met the following criteria:

  • 1.

    histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of primary NSCLC;

  • 2.

    underwent surgery resection;

  • 3.

    age above 18 years old;

  • 4.

    not complicated with other malignancies;

  • 5.

    no severe infection, liver, kidney, or blood coagulation dysfunction.

Patients were excluded if they:

  • 1.

    received anxiolytic or antidepressants treatment within 3 months before enrollment;

  • 2.

    received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy before enrollment;

  • 3.

    have cognitive impairments or neurological diseases and unable to understand daily questions accurately;

  • 4.

    complicated with uncontrolled cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (such as hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, or unstable angina pectoris).

In addition, 480 healthy subjects were recruited as healthy controls (HCs) during the same period. The screening criteria of HCs included:

  • 1.

    no history of malignancies or severe infection;

  • 2.

    no obvious biochemical indexes abnormalities confirmed by physical examination;

  • 3.

    age≥18 years;

  • 4.

    not complicated with uncontrolled cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (such as hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, or unstable angina pectoris).

All participants provided written informed consents, and the Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study.

2.2. Data collection and assessment

Demographic and clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients were recorded after enrollment, which included age, gender, smoking status, history of drink, marital status, employment status before surgery, level of education, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, pathological differentiation, tumor size, lymph node (LYN) metastasis, TNM stage, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. Regarding smoking status, patients were divided into current smokers (continued their smoking habit at the enrollment), former smokers (had quit smoking 1 or more years before the enrollment), quit smokers (had stopped smoking within 1 year before the enrollment) and never smoker (had never smoked before). Besides, anxiety and depression of NSCLC patients was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at discharge after surgery, and the anxiety and depression of HCs was evaluated using HADS at enrollment. The HADS has 14 items, which were designed to measure anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), and the total score on each subscale ranging from 0 to 21.[12] According to the total score of HADS-A and HADS-D, the severity of anxiety and depression were classified as 4 grades:

  • 1.

    no anxiety or depression (total score<8);

  • 2.

    mild anxiety or depression (total score: 8–11);

  • 3.

    moderate anxiety or depression (total score 11–14);

  • 4.

    severe anxiety or depression (total score>14).[12]

2.3. Follow-up

After surgery, patients received appropriate adjuvant therapy if clinically indicated (e.g., chemotherapy and radiation therapy), according to NCCN guideline of NSCLC.[13] Regularly follow-up was performed by telephone or clinical visit, and all patients were followed up to death or 36 months. Throughout follow-up, disease relapse and death were recorded. The disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated from the date of entry into the study to the date of relapse or death, and for the patients without information of relapse or death at last follow-up, they were censored on the date of relapse or last visit. The OS was calculated from the date of entry into the study to the date of death, and for the patients not known to have died at last follow-up, they were censored on the date of last known to be alive.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), and figures were plotted using GraphPad Prism 7.01 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range (IQR), or count (percentage). Comparison between 2 groups was analyzed by Student t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test or Chi-Squared test. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted to display DFS and OS, and the difference of DFS and OS between 2 groups was determined by Log-rank test. All tests were two-tailed, and P value<.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Study flow

Initially, 566 NSCLC patients were invited, among which 86 patients were excluded (35 patients were not suitable for resection; 24 patients presented with relapsed or secondary NSCLC; 13 patients refused to sign the informed consents; 8 patients received anxiolytic or antidepressant treatments in the past 3 months; 6 patients were complicated with uncontrolled cardio-cerebrovascular diseases) (Fig. 1). Then, 480 eligible NSCLC patients were followed up to death or 36 months. During the follow-up, 43 patients were lost follow-up. All 480 NSCLC patients were included in the final analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study flow. NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

3.2. NSCLC patients’ characteristics

The mean age of NSCLC patients was 61.0 ± 9.9 years, and there were 118 (24.6%) females as well as 362 (75.4%) males. As for smoking status, there were 23 (4.8%), 82 (17.1%), 156 (32.5%) and 219 (45.6%) current smokers, former smokers, quit smokers and never smokers, respectively. History of drink was found in 261 (54.4%) and 184 (38.3%) NSCLC patients. Furthermore, 182 (37.9%), 144 (30.0%) and 85 (17.7%) NSCLC patients had hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, respectively. Additionally, there were 149 (31.0%) NSCLC patients with TNM stage I, 168 (35.0%) with TNM stage II and 163 (34.0%) with TNM stage III. Other detailed characteristics of NSCLC patients were listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients.

3.2.

3.3. Prevalence and severity of anxiety in NSCLC patients and HCs

Th HADS-A score of NSCLC patients (7.8 ± 3.9) was higher than that of HCs (4.8 ± 2.7) (P < .001) (Fig. 2A). And the prevalence of anxiety was elevated in NSCLC patients (49.6%) compared with HCs (13.8%) (P < .001) (Fig. 2B). As for anxiety severity, 115 (48.3%), 99 (41.6%) and 24 (10.1%) NSCLC patients were with mild, moderate and severe anxieties, respectively, whereas 55 (83.3%), 11 (16.7%) and 0 (0%) HCs presented mild, moderate, and severe anxieties respectively (P < .001) (Fig. 2C). These data implied anxiety was much more prevalent and severe in NSCLC patients compared to HCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

HADS-A score, anxiety rate and severity in NSCLC patients and HCs. Comparisons of HADS-A score (A), anxiety rate (B) and anxiety severity (C) between NSCLC patients and HCs. Comparison of HADS-A score between NSCLC patients and HCs was assessed by Student t test, and comparison of anxiety rate between NSCLC patients and HCs was performed by Chi-Squared test. Furthermore, comparison of anxiety severity was evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum test. P value < .05 was considered significant. HADS-A, hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; HC, healthy controls.

3.4. Prevalence and severity of depression in NSCLC patients and HCs

The HADS-D score was 7.2 ± 3.6 in NSCLC patients, which was raised compared with that in HCs (4.2 ± 2.6) (P < .001) (Fig. 3A). Regarding depression prevalence, it was higher in NSCLC patients (38.3%) than that in HCs (10.0%) (P < .001) (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, 94 (51.1%), 74 (40.2%), and 16 (8.7%) NSCLC patients presented with mild, moderate, and severe depression respectively, whereas 44 (91.7%), 4 (8.3%) and 0 (0%) HCs were with mild, moderate, and severe depressions respectively (P < .001) (Fig. 3C). These findings suggested that depression was much more prevalent and severe in NSCLC patients compared with HCs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HADS-D score, depression rate and severity in NSCLC patients and HCs. Comparisons of HADS-D score (A), depression rate (B) and depression severity (C) between NSCLC patients and HCs. Comparison of HADS-D score between NSCLC patients and HCs was assessed by Student t test. As for depression rate, its comparison between NSCLC patients and HCs was conducted by Chi-Squared test. Besides, comparison of depression severity was analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. P value < .05 was considered significant. HADS-D, hospital anxiety and depression scale-depression; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; HC, healthy controls.

3.5. Correlation of anxiety with sociodemographic characteristics in NSCLC patients

Anxiety correlated with gender (female) (P = .026) and marital status (single, divorced/widowed vs married) (P < .001) in NSCLC patients (Table 2). While no correlation of anxiety with age (P = .360), smoking status (P = .529), history of drink (P = .675), employment status before surgery (P = .890), or level of education (P = .836) was observed in NSCLC patients.

Table 2.

Correlation of anxiety with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

3.5.

3.6. Correlation of anxiety with clinical characteristics in NSCLC patients

Anxiety correlated with hypertension (P = .016), diabetes (P < .001), poorer pathological differentiation (P < .001), larger tumor size (>5 cm) (P = .005), LYN metastasis (P = .011), advanced TNM stage (P < .001), and higher concentration of CEA (>5 ng/ml) (P = .038) in NSCLC patients (Table 2). While no correlation of anxiety with hyperlipidemia (P = .905) was revealed in NSCLC patients.

3.7. Correlation of depression with sociodemographic characteristics in NSCLC patients

Depression correlated with marital status (single, divorced/widowed vs married) (P < .001) and employment status before surgery (employed) (P = .040) in NSCLC patients (Table 3). While there was no correlation of depression with age (P = .675), gender (P = 0.299), smoking status (P = .246), history of drink (P = .099), and level of education (P = .186) in NSCLC patients.

Table 3.

Correlation of depression with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

3.7.

3.8. Correlation of depression with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in NSCLC patients

Depression correlated with diabetes (P < .001), poorer pathological differentiation (P < .001) and advanced TNM stage (P = .012) in NSCLC patients (Table 3). While there was no correlation of depression with hypertension (P = .074), hyperlipidemia (P = .235), tumor size (P = .074), LYN metastasis (P = .293) or CEA (P = .261) in NSCLC patients.

3.9. Correlation of anxiety with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by multivariate logistic regression model

Multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited that marital status (divorced/widowed vs married) (P = .047, OR = 1.713), marital status (single vs married) (P < .001, OR = 5.522), hypertension (P = .035, OR = 1.646), diabetes (P < .001, OR = 4.593), poorer pathological differentiation (P < .001, OR = 1.793), and advanced TNM stage (P < .001, OR = 2.086) independently correlated with higher anxiety risk, whereas level of education (high school vs primary school or less) (P = .044, OR = 0.436) independently correlated with lower anxiety risk in NSCLC patients (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors affecting anxiety.

3.9.

3.10. Correlation of depression with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by multivariate logistic regression model

Multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that marital status (divorced/widowed vs married) (P < .001, OR = 3.036), marital status (single vs married) (P = .002, OR = 2.739), employed before surgery (P = .001, OR = 2.139), diabetes (P < .001, OR = 4.978), poorer pathological differentiation (P = .003, OR = 1.651), and advanced TNM stage (P = .042, OR = 1.479) independently correlated with higher depression risk, whereas level of education (undergraduate vs primary school or less) (P = .002, OR = .269) independently correlated with lower depression risk in NSCLC patients (Table 5).

Table 5.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors affecting depression.

3.10.

3.11. Correlations of anxiety and depression with DFS in NSCLC patients

NSCLC patients with anxiety exhibited shorter DFS compared to NSCLC patients without anxiety (P = .011) (Fig. 4A). Meanwhile, NSCLC patients with depression showed shorter DFS compared with NSCLC patients without depression as well (P = .035) (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Differences of DFS between anxiety vs non-anxiety, depression vs nondepression NSCLC patients. Comparison of DFS between NSCLC patients with and without anxiety (A). Comparison of DFS between NSCLC patients with and without depression (B). DFS was displayed with Kaplan–Meier curve, and comparisons of DFS between anxiety vs nonanxiety, depression vs nondepression NSCLC patients were determined by log-rank test. P value < .05 was considered significant. DFS, disease-free survival; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

3.12. Correlations of anxiety and depression with OS in NSCLC patients

NSCLC patients with anxiety presented shorter OS compared to NSCLC patients without anxiety (P = .038) (Fig. 5A). While, no correlation of depression with OS was observed in NSCLC patients (P = .148) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Differences of OS between anxiety vs non-anxiety, depression vs nondepression NSCLC patients. Comparison of OS between NSCLC patients with and without anxiety (A). Comparison of OS between NSCLC patients with and without depression (B). OS was shown by Kaplan–Meier curve, and comparisons of OS between anxiety vs non-anxiety, depression vs nondepression NSCLC patients were examined by log-rank test. P value < .05 was considered significant. OS, overall survival; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we discovered that:

  • 1.

    NSCLC patients who underwent resection had higher prevalence and severity of anxiety as well as depression than HCs.

  • 2.

    Anxiety was associated with gender (female), marital status (single, divorced, and widowed vs married), hypertension, diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, larger tumor size, LYN metastasis, advanced TNM stage, and higher concentration of CEA in NSCLC patients; Depression was associated with marital status (single, divorced, and widowed vs married), employment status before surgery (employed), diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, and advanced TNM stage in NSCLC patients.

  • 3.

    Anxiety and depression were associated with unfavorable prognosis in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.

Previous studies elucidate that anxiety and depression are highly prevalent in lung cancer patients.[5,10,14,15] In consistence with prior evidences, the present study observed that the anxiety and depression of NSCLC patients who underwent resection were much more prevalent and severe than HCs. The possible explanations might be that:

  • 1.

    The terminal characteristic of NSCLC and aggressive treatment-related symptoms (such as insomnia and fatigue) might elicit shock, fear, social isolation, and hopelessness, thereby, resulting in the occurrences of anxiety and depression as well as the acceleration of anxiety and depression in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.

  • 2.

    The impaired daily activities, declined ability for maintaining their social and family roles as well as financial difficulties related with surgery might contribute to the elevated risks and severity of anxiety and depression in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.

Various factors associated with the development of anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients are revealed previously, including sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and so on.[14,16] For example, 1 study illuminates that without surgery and younger age (<65 years) are correlated with higher risks of anxiety and depression in patients with lung cancers.[14] Another study reveals that dyspnoea and lower education level are associated with post-operative anxiety, and diabetes mellitus, residual postoperative pain (VAS ≥ 5) and dyspnoea are associated with postoperative depression in primary lung cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery.[16] In the present study, we found that anxiety correlated with gender (female), marital status (single, divorced, and widowed vs married), hypertension, diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, larger tumor size, LYN metastasis, advanced TNM stage and higher concentration of CEA in NSCLC patients; Depression correlated with marital status (single, divorced, and widowed vs married), employment status before surgery (employed), diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, and advanced TNM stage. Additionally, marital status (single, divorced/widowed vs married), hypertension, diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, and advanced TNM stage independently correlated with higher anxiety risk, whereas level of education (high school vs primary school or less) independently correlated with lower anxiety risk in NSCLC patients; Marital status (single, divorced/widowed vs married), employed before surgery, diabetes, poorer pathological differentiation, and advanced TNM stage independently correlated with higher depression risk, whereas level of education (undergraduate vs primary school or less) independently correlated with lower depression risk in NSCLC patients. The possible reasons were as follow:

  • 1.

    Females were more prone to encounter intense hormonal fluctuations linked with reproductive events such as pregnancy and menopause, which was responsible for higher rate of anxiety.[17]

  • 2.

    Single, divorced, or widowed NSCLC patients might have less emotional support, lower self-esteem and insufficient ability to cope stress, thus, leading to increased susceptibility of anxiety and depression.[18]

  • 3.

    Employed NSCLC patients were more likely to experience depression due to impaired physical activities and increased work absence.

  • 4.

    NSCLC patients with hypertension and diabetes suffered from a greater symptom burden, treatment-related side effects and financial difficulties, thus, contributing to higher risk of anxiety and depression.

  • 5.

    NSCLC patients with poor pathological differentiation, larger tumor size, LYN metastasis, advanced TNM stage and more CEA might have more severe disease condition, cancer-related pain and more aggressive treatment-related side effects, which put NSCLC patients at higher risks of anxiety and depression.

  • 6.

    NSCLC patients with higher levels of education had more knowledge in terms of cancers and had less worries about the adverse consequences of cancers and related treatments, thus, led to decreased risk of anxiety and depression.

A few studies show that anxiety and depression exert negative impact on the prognosis of NSCLC patients.[10,11] For instance, 1 study elucidates that anxiety is associated with elevated lung cancer-specific and all-cause mortality in patients with stage III NSCLC.[11] Another study reports that advanced NSCLC patients with depression exhibit decreased OS compared to patients without depression.[10] Whereas, the evidence regarding the effect of anxiety and depression on the survival in NSCLC patients who underwent resection is scarce. The present study characterized that anxiety and depression were associated with shorter survival in NSCLC patients who underwent resection. These might be explained by that:

  • 1.

    NSCLC patients with anxiety and depression were less likely to comply with prescribed medication or adhere to routine physician examinations, which led to elevated disease severity and unsatisfied prognosis.

  • 2.

    Anxiety and depression might activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which exerted suppressive effects on immune function such as immune surveillance of tumors via decreasing cytotoxic T-cell and natural-killer-cell activities, thereby, promoting neoplastic growth, accelerating NSCLC progression and worse survival in NSCLC patients who underwent resection.[1921]

Our study was subject to several limitations. Firstly, all the patients were recruited from a single center, which might limit the generalizability of our findings. Secondly, only a self-administrated questionnaire (HADS score) was used for anxiety and depression evaluation, which might cause an assessment bias, thus, more anxiety and depression assessments needed for further validation. Thirdly, some confounders such as the distinctions in the operation skills of surgeons were not considered in our study. Fourthly, NSCLC patients were only followed up for a relatively short-period (36 months), hence, the long-term effect of anxiety and depression on prognosis in NSCLC patients who underwent resection needed further exploration. Lastly, the detailed mechanism of the anxiety and depression in impacting the survival of NSCLC patients who underwent resection was not investigated.

In conclusion, proper management of anxiety and depression might assist the post-operative care for improving prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Guang-Quan Xu.

Data curation: Tian-Ze Zhang, Lei Liu.

Formal analysis: Xuan Huang.

Methodology: Guang-Hua Li.

Supervision: Guang-Quan Xu.

Writing – original draft: Xuan Huang, Tian-Ze Zhang, Guang-Hua Li.

Writing – review & editing: Lei Liu, Guang-Quan Xu.

Guang-Quan Xu orcid: 0000-0001-7955-6885.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen, DFS = disease-free survival, HADS = hospital anxiety and depression scale, HCs = healthy controls, IQR = interquartile range, LYN = lymph node, NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer, OS = overall survival, SD = standard deviation.

How to cite this article: Huang X, Zhang TZ, Li GH, Liu L, Xu GQ. Prevalence and correlation of anxiety and depression on the prognosis of post-operative non-small-cell lung cancer patients in North China. Medicine. 2020;99:11(e19087).

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Pastorkova Z, Skarda J, Andel J. The role of microRNA in metastatic processes of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech V 160 2016;343–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Thakur MK, Wozniak AJ. Spotlight on necitumumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2017;8:13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Majem B, Nadal E, Munoz-Pinedo C. Exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities of Non small cell lung carcinoma. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Shimizu K, Nakaya N, Saito-Nakaya K, et al. Clinical biopsychosocial risk factors for depression in lung cancer patients: a comprehensive analysis using data from the lung cancer database project. Ann Oncol 2012;23:1973–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Yang YL, Liu L, Wang Y, et al. The prevalence of depression and anxiety among Chinese adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2013;13:393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Stark DP, House A. Anxiety in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1261–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Ghoneim MM, O’Hara MW. Depression and postoperative complications: an overview. BMC Surg 2016;16:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Arora A, Saini SK, Nautiyal V, et al. Cancer pain, anxiety, and depression in admitted patients at a tertiary care hospital: a prospective observational study. Indian J Palliat Care 2019;25:562–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Arrieta O, Angulo LP, Nunez-Valencia C, et al. Association of depression and anxiety on quality of life, treatment adherence, and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1941–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Vodermaier A, Lucas S, Linden W, et al. Anxiety after diagnosis predicts lung cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with stage iii non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based cohort study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017;53:1057–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. NCCN: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Version 1.2013. https://www.nccn.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Yan X, Chen X, Li M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression in Chinese patients with lung cancera cross-sectional study. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:4347–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Jung JY, Lee JM, Kim MS, et al. Comparison of fatigue, depression, and anxiety as factors affecting posttreatment health-related quality of life in lung cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncol 2018;27:465–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Park S, Kang CH, Hwang Y, et al. Risk factors for postoperative anxiety and depression after surgical treatment for lung cancerdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:e16–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Zsido RG, Villringer A, Sacher J. Using positron emission tomography to investigate hormone-mediated neurochemical changes across the female lifespan: implications for depression. Int Rev Psychiatry 2017;29:580–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Piccinelli M, Wilkinson G. Gender differences in depression. Critical review. Br J Psychiatry 2000;177:486–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Pinquart M, Duberstein PR. Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2010;40:1797–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Spiegel D, Giese-Davis J. Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:269–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Reiche EM, Nunes SO, Morimoto HK. Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:617–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES