Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Aug 20;9(34):e00715-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00715-20

Draft Genome Sequences of Seven Strains of Paenibacillus spp. (Phylum Firmicutes) Inhabiting the Seeds of Cucumis melo L. (Cantaloupe) and Exhibiting Plant Probiotic Traits

Eman M Khalaf a,b,, Manish N Raizada a
Editor: David A Baltrusc
PMCID: PMC7441237  PMID: 32816979

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of seven Paenibacillus sp. strains (EKM202P, EKM205P, EKM206P, EKM207P, EKM208P, EKM211P, and EKM212P) that were previously isolated from cultivated surface-sterilized seeds of Cucumis melo L. (cantaloupe). These candidate Paenibacillus plant probiotics displayed in vitro growth-promoting traits and suppressive activity against root-associated fungal/oomycete pathogens.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of seven Paenibacillus sp. strains (EKM202P, EKM205P, EKM206P, EKM207P, EKM208P, EKM211P, and EKM212P) that were previously isolated from cultivated surface-sterilized seeds of Cucumis melo L. (cantaloupe). These candidate Paenibacillus plant probiotics displayed in vitro growth-promoting traits and suppressive activity against root-associated fungal/oomycete pathogens.

ANNOUNCEMENT

In recent decades, the genus Paenibacillus has been described (1), and many strains are commercially exploited (2). Paenibacilli are recognized as plant symbionts, particularly root associated (2, 3); however, their sporulation capacity enables dormancy within seeds (4). High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that the genus Paenibacillus dominated cucurbit seeds, including melons (5), consistent with their cultivated microbiota (6). Seven unique bacterial colonies were selected from surface-sterilized seeds of Cucumis melo L. (cantaloupe), classified using the 16S primer pair 799F/1492R as Paenibacillus spp. (EKM202P, EKM205P, EKM206P, EKM207P, EKM208P, EKM211P, and EKM212P), and then submitted to GenBank (accession numbers KT281420.1, KT281430.1, KT281426.1, KT281421.1, KT281431.1, KT281427.1, and KT281423.1, respectively) (6). These microbes were assessed in vitro for their biostimulant/biocontrol potential. All strains demonstrated exoenzymatic activity (cellulase, pectinase, and protease [6] and RNase [7]) and acetoin/diacetyl (volatile) production and suppressed the plant pathogens Fusarium graminearum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Phytophthora capsici in vitro (7) (EKM212P was negative for pectinase [6] and RNase [7] activities). Exclusively, EKM202P and EKM212P suppressed Pythium aphanidermatum (7), while EKM202P and EKM205P grew on a nitrogen-free medium (LGI medium) (6).

With the use of −80°C glycerol stocks, the strains were cultured on LB agar. Single colonies were inoculated into lysogeny broth and incubated overnight at 37°C at 250 rpm. Genomic DNA was isolated from pellets using DNeasy UltraClean microbial kits (product number 12224-50; Qiagen) and then adjusted to 50 ng/μl. Libraries were constructed using TruSeq DNA Nano library preparation kits (KAPA HyperPrep kit KK8504) and then sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, which delivered 2,850,454 (EKM202P), 2,568,261 (EKM205P), 2,970,533 (EKM206P), 1,587,495 (EKM207P), 3,274,658 (EKM208P), 2,260,644 (EKM211P), and 2,754,662 (EKM212P) raw reads of the 150-bp paired-end format. De novo assembly of clean reads (quality score threshold, 30) was completed using the Evogene Clustering/Assembly Toolbox (EvoCAT) pipeline, and then the assembled contigs were taxonomically identified using KmerFinder v3.2 (8) leading to 115, 100, 118, 65, 136, 96, and 116-fold sequence coverage compared to that of Paenibacillus sp. strain M-152 (GenBank accession number NZ_CP034141.1) (EKM202P and EKM207P), Paenibacillus polymyxa strain YC0573 (NZ_CP017968.3) (9) (EKM205P and EKM206P), Paenibacillus polymyxa strain J (NZ_CP015423.1) (EKM208P and EKM212P), and Paenibacillus polymyxa strain HY96-2 (NZ_CP025957.1) (10) (EKM211P), respectively. Predicted proteins were defined using Prodigal (11) and matched against the NCBI nonredundant protein database using BLASTp (12), and then peptide domains were identified using InterProScan v5.32-71.0 (13). Assembly statistics and accession numbers are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and accession numbers of Paenibacillus genomes

Isolate Bacterial speciesa Genome size (bp) No. of contigs N50 (bp) No. of genes G+C content (%) SRA accession no. GenBank accession no.
EKM202P Paenibacillus sp. 5,917,862 170 245,720 4,677 50 SRR11051668 JAAMNO000000000
EKM205P P. polymyxa 5,731,588 208 460,107 4,600 52 SRR11051660 JAAMNU000000000
EKM206P P. polymyxa 5,726,213 162 393,822 4,595 52 SRR11051647 JAAMNQ000000000
EKM207P Paenibacillus sp. 5,907,745 170 204,300 4,682 49.5 SRR11051667 JAAMNP000000000
EKM208P P. polymyxa 6,751,337 2,164 371,116 6,210 45 SRR11051674 JAAMNT000000000
EKM211P P. polymyxa 5,764,313 119 221,247 4,529 48 SRR11051664 JAAMNS000000000
EKM212P P. polymyxa 5,625,291 102 670,972 4,485 51.5 SRR11051658 JAAMNR000000000
a

The taxonomy of these bacterial species is according to the updated GenBank databases.

All of the Paenibacillus genomes encode candidate proteins implicated in the aforementioned in vitro activities and additional traits, including tryptophan synthase (auxin production), carbon-nitrogen hydrolase, nitrogen regulatory protein PII, nitrogen assimilation/fixation (nif), phytase, alkaline phosphatase, and trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase (2, 14, 15), cytokinin riboside 5'-monophosphate phosphoribohydrolase LOG (16, 17), and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (growth/stress regulation) (18). Biocontrol/immunomodulation genes were identified for hydrolytic exoenzymes (chitinases, β-glucanases, lipases, proteases, pectin/pectate lyases, and ribonucleases) (2, 16, 19, 20), butanediol dehydrogenase-like enzymes (acetoin production) (1), iron siderophore-like compounds (aerobactin siderophore biosynthesis and IucA/IucC [exclusively EKM208P and EKM212P]) (2, 21), bacteriocins (thiopeptide type) (22), polyketide synthase and nonribosomal peptide synthase (lipopeptide synthesis) (15, 23), phenazine biosynthesis PhzF protein (except EKM211P) (24), alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (antioxidative enzyme) (25), and biomolecules for biofilm formation and quorum sensing (10, 14, 26, 27). This fundamental analysis may support future experiments to formulate new agricultural bioproducts.

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun project and raw Illumina reads were deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank and the SRA, respectively, under the accession numbers provided in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ada Viterbo and collaborators at Lavie Bio Ltd. for genome sequencing and bioinformatic support.

This research was supported by grants from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rybakova D, Cernava T, Köberl M, Liebminger S, Etemadi M, Berg G. 2016. Endophytes-assisted biocontrol: novel insights in ecology and the mode of action of Paenibacillus. Plant Soil 405:125–140. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2526-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A, Yuan ZC. 2016. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact 15:203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park KY, Seo SY, Oh BR, Seo JW, Kim YJ. 2018. 2,3-Butanediol induces systemic acquired resistance in the plant immune response. J Plant Biol 61:424–434. doi: 10.1007/s12374-018-0421-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. 2015. Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ Microbiol Rep 7:40–50. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. 2019. Cucurbit seeds: reservoirs of functional and antagonistic microbiomes. Presented at Plant Canada 2019, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 7 to 10 July 2019.
  • 6.Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. 2016. Taxonomic and functional diversity of cultured seed associated microbes of the cucurbit family. BMC Microbiol 16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0743-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. 2018. Bacterial seed endophytes of domesticated cucurbits antagonize fungal and oomycete pathogens including powdery mildew. Front Microbiol 9:42. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deng X, den Bakker HC, Hendriksen RS. 2016. Genomic epidemiology: whole-genome-sequencing–powered surveillance and outbreak investigation of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 7:353–374. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu H, Liu K, Li Y, Wang C, Hou Q, Xu W, Fan L, Zhao J, Gou J, Du B, Ding Y. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus polymyxa YC0573, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with antimicrobial activity. Genome Announc 5:e01636-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01636-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luo Y, Cheng Y, Yi J, Zhang Z, Luo Q, Zhang D, Li Y. 2018. Complete genome sequence of industrial biocontrol strain Paenibacillus polymyxa HY96-2 and further analysis of its biocontrol mechanism. Front Microbiol 9:1520. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. 2007. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D61–D65. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R. 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W116–W120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen L, Heng J, Qin S, Bian K. 2018. A comprehensive understanding of the biocontrol potential of Bacillus velezensis LM2303 against Fusarium head blight. PLoS One 13:e0198560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xie J, Shi H, Du Z, Wang T, Liu X, Chen S. 2016. Comparative genomic and functional analysis reveal conservation of plant growth promoting traits in Paenibacillus polymyxa and its closely related species. Sci Rep 6:21329–21312. doi: 10.1038/srep21329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McSpadden Gardener BB. 2004. Ecology of Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp. in agricultural systems. Phytopathology 94:1252–1258. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Naseem M, Bencurova E, Dandekar T. 2018. The cytokinin-activating LOG-family proteins are not lysine decarboxylases. Trends Biochem Sci 43:232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van de Poel B, Van Der Straeten D. 2014. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in plants: more than just the precursor of ethylene! Front Plant Sci 5:640. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Veliz EA, Martínez-Hidalgo P, Hirsch AM. 2017. Chitinase-producing bacteria and their role in biocontrol. AIMS Microbiol 3:689–705. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Neeraja C, Anil K, Purushotham P, Suma K, Sarma P, Moerschbacher BM, Podile AR. 2010. Biotechnological approaches to develop bacterial chitinases as a bioshield against fungal diseases of plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30:231–241. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2010.487258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zawadzka AM, Abergel RJ, Nichiporuk R, Andersen UN, Raymond KN. 2009. Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition systems in Bacillus cereus: identification of receptors for anthrax virulence- associated petrobactin. Bone 48:3645–3657. doi: 10.1021/bi8018674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. 2013. Bacteriocins: a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat Rev Microbiol 11:95–105. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cochrane SA, Vederas JC. 2016. Lipopeptides from Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp.: a gold mine of antibiotic candidates. Med Res Rev 36:4–31. doi: 10.1002/med.21321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tupinambá G, Da Silva AJR, Alviano CS, Souto-Padron T, Seldin L, Alviano DS. 2008. Antimicrobial activity of Paenibacillus polymyxa SCE2 against some mycotoxin-producing fungi. J Appl Microbiol 105:1044–1053. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jiang G, Yang J, Li X, Cao Y, Liu X, Ling J, Wang H, Zhong Z, Zhu J. 2019. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase is important for oxidative stress resistance and symbiosis in Azorhizobium caulinodans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:fnz014. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Timmusk S, Van West P, Gow NAR, Paul Huffstutler R. 2009. Paenibacillus polymyxa antagonizes oomycete plant pathogens Phytophthora palmivora and Pythium aphanidermatum. J Appl Microbiol 106:1473–1481. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yi J, Zhang D, Cheng Y, Tan J, Luo Y. 2019. The impact of Paenibacillus polymyxa HY96-2 luxS on biofilm formation and control of tomato bacterial wilt. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:9643–9657. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10162-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun project and raw Illumina reads were deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank and the SRA, respectively, under the accession numbers provided in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES