Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0235411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235411

Factors associated with treatment initiation delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Kiros Tedla 1,*, Girmay Medhin 2, Gebretsadik Berhe 3, Afework Mulugeta 3, Nega Berhe 2
Editor: Frederick Quinn4
PMCID: PMC7442238  PMID: 32822368

Abstract

Background

Delayed treatment initiation of Tuberculosis patients results in increased infectivity, poor treatment outcome, and increased mortality. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the delay in new adult pulmonary Tuberculosis patients to initiate treatment in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Objective

To assess the factors associated with treatment initiation delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Methods

The study design was cross-sectional. A total of 875 new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients were recruited from 21 health facilities from October 2018 to October 2019. Health facilities were selected by simple random sampling technique and tuberculosis cases from the health facilities were consecutively enrolled. Data were collected using structured questionnaire within the first 2 weeks of treatment initiation. Delay was categorized as patient, health system and total delays. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the odds of delays to initiate treatment. A p-value of less than 0.05 was reported as statistically significant.

Results

The median patient, health system and total delays were 30, 18 and 62 days, respectively. Rural residence, being poor, visiting non-formal medication sources, being primary health care and the private clinic had higher odds of patient delay whereas being HIV positive had lower odds of patient delay. Illiteracy, first visit to primary health care and private clinic had higher odds of health system delay whereas a visit to health facility one time and have no patient delay had lower odds of health system delay.

Conclusion

The median patient delay was higher than the median health system delay before initiating treatment. Hence, improved awareness of the community and involving the informal medication sources in the tuberculosis pathways would reduce patient delay. Similarly, improved cough screening and diagnostic efficiency of the lower health facilities would shorten health system delay.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and remains a major public health problem in many developing countries [1, 2].

Early diagnosis and prompt effective therapy are key elements of successful TB control. But, delayed presentation and treatment initiations are common in both low and high-income countries which may result in prolonged infectivity in the community [3, 4, 5]. A systematic review reported that the median time of delay from onset of cough until treatment initiation varied from 21–136 days [6]. This could be mainly due to the delay in the pathways of TB treatment such as the time elapsed in seeking health/patient delay or the time elapsed at the health facility due to the failure of the health system to diagnose the disease [7, 8]. It is estimated that untreated TB patient can infect an average of 10 contacts annually and over 20 during the natural course of the disease until death [7]. Delay in tuberculosis diagnosis may also lead to a more advanced disease stage at presentation, which contributes to late sequelae, poor treatment outcome and increased mortality [9, 10].

In Ethiopia, delay varies from 60–120 days from onset of symptoms till initiation of treatment [8, 11] with median patient delay of 20–90 days [8, 12, 13] and provider delay of 6–34 days [8, 13, 14]. Risk factors for delay include rural residence [15], lower educational level [16, 14], being women, large family size, and stigma [16], being old age [15], first visit to non-formal health providers [14], first visit to health posts [6] and form of TB [15, 16, 17].

Almost all the studies in Ethiopia focused on either health centers or general hospitals [13, 15, 18] and lacks coverage across all of the levels of the health system but this research was done across all the levels of health system including health centers, general hospitals and referral hospitals. Most of the previous studies were also conducted when the directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) regimen was given for eight months which was later changed into six months starting from 2011 [19]. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate delay to initiate treatment (patient and health system) and factors associated with delay among new PTB cases at health centers and hospitals in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. This would enable for the planning of specific interventions focusing patient, health system or both types of delays that yields the maximum benefit for TB patients and the community at large.

Methods and materials

Study setting

This study was done in 16 health centers and 5 hospitals (4 general hospitals and one specialized referral hospital) from two zones of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Tigray Regional State is located at 12o 15–14 o 57and 36°27- 39°59 latitude. Excluding Mekelle town, the state capital, there are six administrative zones in Tigray. The region has a total population of above 5.3 million which is about 6% of the total population of Ethiopia, over 80% live in the rural areas [20]. There are 214 health centers and 38 hospitals (primary hospital, general hospital, and specialized hospitals) across the region [21].

Study design, participants and study period

A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate patient and health system delay of pulmonary TB (PTB) to initiate treatment in health facilities of two zones of Tigray region. Study participants were newly diagnosed bacteriologically positive or x-ray positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases, above 18 years of age, diagnosed in the study settings from October 2018 to October 2019. Retreated and multiple drug resistance (MDR) TB patients were excluded from the study.

Sample size

The sample size required to estimate the magnitude of delay for initiation of treatment was determined taking an estimate of 81.5% reported in the previous study for the proportion of delay of more than one month [13], 95% confidence in the estimate and 2.6% margin of error. This resulted in a sample size of 850. Hence, including 3% non-response rate, the total sample size was 875.

Sampling procedure

Two zones (i.e. Eastern zone and Mekelle zone) were selected for the current study among the seven zones of the region. These two zones are among the highly populated zones of the region. These zones were selected because of the nature of the research project which needs frequent supervision, follow up and are close to the research Institute where the TB culture is performed. Furthermore, the only functional specialized hospital is found only in Mekelle and the two zones can also represent the region. Within the selected zones, there were 26 primary health care units and 6 hospitals that had adopted DOTS and reported average monthly cases of 3 and above according to the 2016/2017 and 2017/18 HMIS report of Regional Health Bureau [21]. Of these, 21 health facilities (16 health centers and 5 hospitals including the specialized hospital) were included in this study. Health centers were selected by a simple random sampling (SRS) method (lottery method) from the list of the health centers but among six hospitals one hospital was excluded as it is working as ophthalmological center only. A target number of interviewees per facility was proportionally allocated based on the average number of TB cases reported by the facility in prior two years and were consecutively included in the study until the optimal sample size was obtained (see the sampling procedure in Fig 1).

Fig 1. Showing sampling procedure of the study settings and study participants.

Fig 1

Data collection instruments and procedures

Data were collected using questionnaire developed for this study by adopting from questionnaires used in previous studies [7, 8, 11, 22]. Trained data collectors interviewed study participants in the first 2 weeks of their treatment, after obtaining their informed consent. The questionnaire included information about socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics, lifestyle factors like smoking, alcohol consumption, health-seeking behavior, the time since the first symptom, action taken to symptom and others. The study participants were also asked questions regarding the elements that might influence their health-seeking behavior, such as fear of what would be found on diagnosis, fear of social isolation, stigma, and knowledge regarding the disease, satisfaction with care and other issues like distance from the health facility.

Data quality assurance

The questionnaire was pre-tested on 50 TB patients recruited from all of the study settings. During this pre-testing content reliability were assessed. Test-retest reliability was assessed by giving the questionnaire to the same person twice at an interval of 2 weeks and measuring the intra-class correlation coefficient to evaluate the intra-rater reliability. Re-interviewing the same person by two different interviewers and measuring the intra-class correlation coefficient was also performed to measure the inter-rater reliability. The adapted questionnaire was reviewed by experts in Tigray Regional Health Bureau and other researchers experienced in this field to clarify confusing items and to comment on the apparent validity of each item. The comments from the expertise were included and the resulting questionnaire was administered to data collectors to further check items that might not be easy to understand. Finally, the questionnaire was modified according to the results of the pilot phase and the comments from the experts. The final questionnaire was used for data collection. A total of 21 nurses with BSc degrees were used as the data collectors of which three were senior supervisors. These data collectors were trained on the objectives of the study, the importance of the findings and on how to collect the data from study participants. Close supervision was also conducted during the data collection time. The questionnaire was converted into local language (Tigrigna) and the entire interview was conducted using the local language.

Data analysis

Data were entered and processed using SPSS version 21. Proportion for categorical variables and, mean/median for continues variables were used to summarize the collected data. The normality of numeric variables was assessed using plots (Q-Q plots, P-P plots, and histograms) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Following this process, the distribution of the number of days elapsed across different pathways of the delay was not normally distributed. Thus median patient delay and provider delay were compared across different binary groups using Mann-Whitney U and using Kruskal Wali's tests across variables with more than two categories. To dichotomize the sample into either shorter or longer delay period we took 30 days as a cut off for patients’ and 15 days as a cut off for health systems' delay. Thirty days was chosen as it was the median for patients' delay but it was also due to the reason that TB patients who had remained untreated for one month since showing clinical signs would have aggravated clinical outcomes [9, 23]. However, the decision to use 15 days was based on the consultation of treating physicians to TB suspected patients and using the experience of previous Ethiopian studies [8]. Finally, logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with the probability of delay to patient and health system. The selection of the variables for multiple regression was made based on p-value ≤0.2 on crude analysis. The goodness of fit of the logistic regression model was checked using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. In all the statistical tests, any result with the p-value less than 5% was considered as statistically significant.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Ethical Committee of Addis Ababa University, Aklillu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology. A formal permission letter was also obtained from the Regional Health Bureau of Tigray and submitted to the selected district health offices. Each health facility selected for the study was contacted with a permission letter from the district health office. Each case diagnosed as TB according to the national guideline consented in a written form before the interview. To assure confidentiality, interview with TB case was held in a private room and the information collected was recorded anonymously.

Operational definitions

Total delay: the time from the onset of TB symptoms to the first start of anti-TB treatment.

Long total delay: if the time from the onset of TB symptoms to the first start of anti-TB treatment is more than 30 days.

Patient delay: the time from the onset of symptoms until the first contact with the health care service provider in both private and governmental health facilities.

Health system delay: the time from a patient’s first contact with the health care service provider until either a TB diagnosis is made or TB treatment is commenced in both private and governmental health facilities.

Diagnostic delay: the time from first contact with health care service provider until a diagnosis is made.

Treatment delay: the time from when a diagnosis of TB is made until treatment is started.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

A total of 875 study subjects were participated in this study. Of the study participants, 58.1% were males, and 54.5% urban residents. Furthermore, 27.2% were farmers, 21.6% housewives, 18.9% employed, 10.4% daily laborers, 11.4% students, and 10.5% unemployed. The mean age was 38.2 years (sd = 15.1) (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending selected health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, 2019(n = 875).

Variable Categories Frequency Percent
Age, years 18–25 228 26.1
26–44 392 44.8
45–54 144 16.5
≥55 111 12.7
Sex Male 508 58.1
Female 367 41.9
Religion Orthodox 804 91.9
Muslim 54 6.2
Others (catholic and protestant) 17 1.9
Educational status No formal education 349 39.9
Primary school 325 37.1
Secondary school 109 12.5
College and above 92 10.5
Occupation Farmer 238 27.2
Housewives 189 21.6
Employed 165 18.9
Daily laborer 91 10.4
Student 100 11.4
Unemployed 92 10.5
Income Poor (Indebt) 328 37.5
Medium (Income = expense) 321 36.7
Saving (rich) 226 25.8
Marital status Married 570 55.1
Divorced/Widowed 71 8
Single 234 26.7
Residence Rural 398 45.5
Urban 476 54.5
History of smoking Yes 89 10.2
No 786 89.8
Alcohol use Yes 464 53
No 411 47

Clinical characteristics of the study participants

The mean (sd) BMI of the study subjects during treatment initiation was 17.9±2.7 kg/m2. The major clinical symptoms that were experienced by the patients were cough (99.2%), fever (48.6%), and weight loss (45.5%). Regarding HIV status, 11.3% were HIV positive while 2.6% of the study participants had other chronic diseases. About 36.6%, 88.2% and 45.5% of the study participants were AFB, GeneXpert and X ray positive, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending selected health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 875).

Variable Frequency Percent
Clinical signs and symptoms Cough 868 99.2
Fever 425 48.6
Chest pain 389 44.5
Weight loss 398 45.5
Haemoptysis 207 23.7
Othersa 449 51.3
Presence of other chronic diseasesb (excluding HIV) Yes 23 2.6
No 852 97.4
HIV status Positive 99 11.3
Negative 776 88.7
Diagnosis AFB
Positive 320 36.6
Negative 555 63.4
GeneXpert
Positive 772 88.2
Negative 103 11.8
X-ray
Positive 398 45.5
Negative 477 54.5

a Sweating, loss of appetite, fatigue, chill, malaise

b diabetes, arthritis, epilepsy, chronic liver disease, Visceral leishmaniasis, COPD

Health accessibility and health seeking behavior

More than half of the study participants (57.0%) live within 10km distance to nearest health facility. Furthermore, 64.8% of the study participants visited more than one health facility before the actual diagnosis. Regarding their first action to the current illness, 78.6% visited health care provider (HCP), and the major symptoms which made the study participants to visit HCP were cough and haemoptysis. About 43.8% had good knowledge about TB, 45.6% had low degree to stigma and 49% had adequate satisfaction with care (Table 3).

Table 3. Health accessibility and health seeking behavior of new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending selected health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 875).

Variable Frequency Percent
Distance from the nearest health facility ≤10
>10
499 57
376 43
Health facility visits to the current illness 1 308 35.2
2 and above 567 64.8
First action to the current illness HCP 688 78.6
Holly water 79 9.0
Traditional healer 43 4.9
Self medication 65 7.4
Type of health facility first visited Hospital 367 42
Health center 332 38
Private facility 175 20
Type of symptom made to seek HCP Cough 531 60.7
Fever 53 6.1
Chest pain 143 16.3
Haemoptysis 148 16.9
Knowledge about TB Good (> median) 383 43.8
Poor (< median) 492 56.2
Stigma High (> median) 399 45.6
Low (< median) 476 54.4
Satisfaction Good (> median) 429 49
Low (< median) 446 51
Reasons for consultation HCP Confidence in getting cured 275 35.2
Accessible 210 26.9
Referred by health facility 117 15
Othersc 162 20.8
Reasons for non-consultation to HCP Too far 50 48.1
Bad experience 26 25
Othersd 24 23.1
Perceived cause of patient delay Poor staff attitude 361 48.3
Poor quality of health facility 139 18.6
Hoped their symptom would go away by its own 72 9.6
Otherse 114 15

c advised by some body and service available any time

d too busy, insufficient medication, long waiting time and the patient did not consider it important

e fear of social, economic constraints, fear of what would be found on diagnosis, poor quality of care and work load

Delay of TB patients to initiate treatment

Patients took a mean of 86 days and a median of 30 (IQR: 11–180) days to first visit a health care service provider after the onset of their symptoms. Similarly, the mean and median number of days patients delay from the first visit to the health care service provided to the TB diagnosis or initiation of TB treatment in the health system was 39 and 18 days with inter quartile range (IQR) of 2–72 days, respectively. The median (IQR) delay in diagnosis and treatment were 15(1–40) and 2(1–3) respectively. The mean and median numbers of days patients spent to come to health facilities and get the treatment (total delay) were 124 and 62 days, with inter-quartile range of 16–221 days respectively (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Mean and median delays of the study participants during their health seeking pathways in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, October 2018 to October 2019.

Fig 2

Of the entire study participants, 55.2% visited health facility within 30 days of their first sign and symptom. Of all the study participants 52.7% had got the diagnosis and treatment in the health facility within 14 days of their first visit whereas 47.3% took more than 14 days to get the diagnosis and treatment in the health facility. Of all the study participants 26.2% came to health facility and got diagnosis and treatment within 30 days; of the total delayed patients, 52% were due to the patient delay.

Factors associated with patient delay

Summary results from bivariate and multivariable logistic regression showed that those who lived in rural area (OR = 18.7, 95%CI 12.2–28.7), being poor (being indebt) (OR = 5.5, 95%CI 3.3–9.2) and having medium economic status (OR = 2.6, 95%CI 1.6–4.4), visiting to non-formal medication sources (OR = 7, 95%CI 4.3–11.5), being primary health care (OR = 1.6, 95%CI 1.1–2.4) and private clinic (OR = 1.7, 95%CI 1–2.8) were significantly associated with increased patients' delay. Whereas HIV positive individuals were less likely to delay compared to those HIV negative individuals (OR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.26–0.99) (Table 4).

Table 4. Factors associated with patient delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending selected health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 875).
Variables Categories Frequency COR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI)
Patient delay ≤30 days Patient delay >30 days
Sex Male 193 174 1.00 1.00
Female 290 218 1.2(0.92–1.6) 1.1(0.64–1.8)
Income Poor (Indebt) 118 210 8.8(5.8–14) 5.5(3.3–9.2)*
Medium (income = expense) 177 144 4(2.7–6.1) 2.6(1.6–4.4)*
Rich (Saving) 188 38 1.00 1.00
Residence Rural 86 306 15(10.8–21) 11(7.6–16)*
Urban 390 92 1.00 1.00
Type of health facility Hospital 233 134 1.00 1.00
Health center 164 168 1.8(1.3–2.4) 1.6(1.1–2.4)*
Private clinic 86 89 3(1.3–2.6) 1.7(1–2.8)*
Distance from nearest health facility, km ≤10 287 210 0.79(0.6–1) 0.8(0.54–1.2)
>10 195 181 1.00 1.00
Satisfaction Good 308 138 0.3(.23-.41) 0.9(0.56–1.3)
Poor 175 254 1.00 1.00
First action to symptoms Health facility visit 447 241 1.00 1.00
Visit to non formal
medication source 36 151 7.8(5.2–11.5) 7(4.3–12)*
HIV status Positive 64 35 0.6(0.42–0.99) 0.52(0.26–0.99)*
Negative 419 357 1.00 1.00

*statistically significant at p<0.05

Factors associated with health system delay

Findings from the bivaraite and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that those who were illiterate (OR = 2.12, 95%CI 1.27–3.56), those with secondary school education (OR = 1.73, 95%CI 1.03–2.89), first sought in primary health care (OR = 1.7, 95%CI 1.3–2.3) and private clinic (OR = 1.7, 95%CI 1.2–2.5) were significantly associated with increased health system delay. Whereas those who visited health facility one time (OR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.20–0.46) and those who didn’t come delayed at their first presentation after developing the signs and symptoms (OR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.39–0.76) were less likely to delay compared to their counter parts (Table 5).

Table 5. Factors associated with health system delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending selected health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 875).
Variables Categories Frequency COR AOR
Health system delay ≤15 Health system delay>15
Type of diagnosis AFB Yes 138 182 1.8(1.4–2.4) 0.75(0.47–1.2)
No 323 232 1.00 1.00
GeneXpert Yes 397 375 1.6(1–2.4) 1.2(.76–2)
No 64 39 1.00 1.00
X-ray Yes 176 222 1.9(1.4–2.5) 1.3(0.87–2)
No 285 192 1.00 1.00
Educational status Illiterate 184 165 2.1(0.91–2.9) 2.1(1.3–3.6)*
Primary school 156 169 1.6(0.91–2.9) 1.4(.76–2.6)
Secondary school 60 49 1.8(1.1–2.85) 1.7(1–2.9)
College and above 61 31 1.00 1.00
Type of health facility first sought Public hospital 225 142 1.00 1.00
Health center 160 172 1.7(1.3–2.3) 1.3(1–1.9)*
Private clinic 84 91 1.7(1.2–2.5) 1.5(1–2.2)*
HIV status Positive 54 45 0.91(0.60–1.4) 0.91(.56–1.5)
Negative 407 369 1.00 1.00
Number of health facility encounters 1 204 104 0.26(0.18- 0.21(0.2–0.46)*
>1 257 310 0.37) 1.00 1.00
Patient delay Yes 157 235 1.00 1.00
No 304 179 0.39(0.3–0.52) 0.54(0.39–0.76)*

*statistically significant at p<0.05

Discussion

The median patient, health system and total delays were 30 days, 18 days and 62 days in the study setting respectively. Whereas the proportion of TB patients patient, health system and total delays were 55.2%, 52% and 73.8% respectively. The determinant factors affecting patient delay were HIV status, being health center or private clinic, visiting non-formal medication sources, and economic status. Absence of formal education, repeated visit to lower health facilities, delayed presentation to health facility and first sought at the health center and private clinic were associated with health system delay.

Length of delay in the pathways to initiate TB treatment

The median patient and health system delays in the current study were similar with previous findings reported in Ethiopia [9, 17] and Africa [24, 25]. However, the median patient delay was shorter than previous studies in Ethiopia [16, 26, 27] and longer than other reports from Ethiopia [28, 29] and African [3, 30] but the health system delay was shorter than studies in Ethiopia [13, 14] which have similar median patient delay with this study. The reason for the shorter delay might be related to while two of the previous studies [16, 29] were done in pastoralist communities; the current study was done in the agrarian community having relatively better accessibility and knowledge about TB compared to the pastoralist community. The reason for the longer patient delay compared to other African countries could be related with accessibility to the health facility as about 87.5% and 89% of the study participants in Tanzania and Chad had lived with less than 10km from the health facility respectively, while in this study only 57% live with a distance of less than 10km from the health facility [3, 30].

Factors linked with patient-related delays to initiate TB treatment

Rural residents had higher odds of patient delay compared to the urban residents in health-seeking which was supported by studies done in Ethiopia [27, 31, 32], and Mediterranean region [7]. This might be related to the poor access of rural residents to health information and health facilities compared to the urban residents. Study had indicated that rural residency makes it difficult to travel to health facilities in terms of travel time from patients’ areas of residences to public facilities [33].

Being low in economic status was associated with increased patient delay which is supported by studies from Ethiopia [26], Africa [34] and Asia [35]. This might be related to the patients’ inability to cover the direct and indirect costs like transport, food, consultations, investigation costs like X-ray and others even though laboratory (GeneXpert and AFB) and treatment costs are free. A study from Kenya had indicated that patients spend 7.1% of their median household income before actual diagnosis and in Ethiopia patients spend 125% of their monthly income to get a proper diagnosis [36, 37] which might explain the delayed presentation of the poor to the health facility.

Visiting non-formal medication sources (holy water, traditional medication, and self-medication) were strongly associated with delayed presentation of patients to the health system. This is in line with studies from Ethiopia [13, 18, 7, 10, 14] and Africa [7]. This could be due to the use of some home remedies or antibiotics might lessen or mask the manifestation of the illness which might inhibit the timely presentation of the patient to the health care system.

Being primary health center and private clinic was associated with higher odds of patient delay. This is similar to studies in Ethiopia [17, 18], and Africa [33] but contrary to study from Ethiopia [30]. This is mainly due to low reliance or confidence of the patients on the lower health facilities as only about 35.2% of the health facility consulted patients had confidence in curing their illness at the lower health facilities (health centers) in this study.

However, being HIV positive was inversely related to patient delay as HIV positive patients were presented to the health facility earlier than HIV negative TB patients. This study was contrary to researches done in Ethiopia [19] but similar to study from Asia [38]. This could be by the fact that HIV-positive TB patients had more serious clinical symptoms which may have prompted them to seek treatment earlier [12, 38].

Factors linked with health system-related delays to initiate TB treatment

Absence of formal education was strongly associated with health system delay which is similar to studies done in Ethiopia [19, 27], and Africa [7]. Those with college and above education levels might have better information about TB, increased awareness of TB disease which might help to seek care early and inform the health professional in a better way during diagnosis [39, 40].

Repeated visits to the lower health facilities (health centers and private clinic) were strongly associated with health system delay which is similar with studies done in Ethiopia [17], and Africa [24]. This might be due to the poor identification of TB patients by the health professionals as indicated in a recent study from Ethiopia where one third and nearly half of health care workers of public health facilities had poor knowledge and unsatisfactory practice on the management of tuberculosis infection [39].

Patients who were delayed during presentation were also more likely to have a delay in the health system; which is similar to studies from other parts of Ethiopia [17] but contrary to study from Georgia [40]. The reason for such difference might be related to the cut-off points used to ascertain delayed and non-delayed patients. Furthermore, the reason for such delay would be due to patients use different self medications and homemade remedies which might affect altering the clinical manifestations of the patients [40]. Furthermore, studies had also reported that more severe disease at presentation [23] hinders timely [14] diagnosis.

TB patients who first sought service in the health center and private clinic were associated with higher odds of health system delay. This is similar to other studies from Ethiopia [17, 18], and Africa [33] but contrary to study from Ethiopia [30]. This is mainly due to the lower health facility and private clinic had the luck of adherence to guideline, trained personnel and equipment specific for TB diagnosis. Furthermore, currently in the area where this study was conducted all hospitals are equipped with GeneXpert. The current research had limitations like measurement of delays relied on patient self-report which is liable to recall bias. However, we tried to minimize this bias through interviewing patients soon after diagnosis and helping them to recall using local events like national holidays, religious days, and dates of some events (birthdays, death, epiphany or marriage).

Conclusion and recommendation

In general, more than thee forth of TB patients had initiated treatment after a delay of more than a month where both patient and health system delays had contributed equally in the study area. Moreover, the median delay elapsed during patients' presentations to health provider was higher compared to the time elapsed at the health system. Rural residents, being poor and medium income, visiting non-formal medication sources and being primary health care or private clinic were associated with increased patient delay whereas, being HIV positive was inversely related to the patient delay. Illiteracy, first visit to the primary health care and private clinic, repeated visit to the lower health facilities, and Patient delay were more likely to have a delay at the health system. Therefore, improving accessibility to diagnosis mainly to the rural residents through implementation of rapid diagnostic tools at the lower health facility, screening every individual with cough regardless of the time the cough starts and strengthening the public-private partnership in diagnosis and treatment of TB patients in order to reduce both patient and health system delay. Implementing strategies to collaborate with informal medical sources (traditional healers, local drug sellers, and religious leaders) on how to suspect TB symptoms & refer to government health facilities for diagnosis is recommended.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLSX)

S1 File

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, for giving us the opportunity to undertake research. We would like also to thank Mekelle University for giving us full sponsorship to conduct this study. We would also like to thank all health professionals working in the health facilities where this study was conducted, the study participants and Tigray regional health bureau.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no fund for this research work.

References

  • 1.Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Mitchell RN. Robbins Basic Pathology (8th ed). Saunders Elsevier; 2007; 516–522. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO: Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva: 2019: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329368/9789241565714-eng.pdf?ua = 1.
  • 3.Wandwalo ER, Morkveø. Delay in tuberculosis case finding and treatment in Mwanza, Tanzania. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000, 4(2):133–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Odusanya OO, Babafemi JO: Patterns of delays amongst pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Public Health 2004, 4:18 10.1186/1471-2458-4-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu B, Jiang QW, Xiu Y, Diwan VK: Diagnostic delays in access to tuberculosis care in counties with or without the National Tuberculosis Control Programme in rural China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005, 9(7):784–790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Storla DG, Yimer S and Bjune GA. A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:15 10.1186/1471-2458-8-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization/WHO, Diagnostic and Treatment Delay in Tuberculosis: An in-Depth Analysis of the HealthSeeking Behavior of Patients and Health System Response in Seven Countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2006.
  • 8.Yimer S, Bjune G and Alene G. Diagnostic and treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2005; 5: 112 10.1186/1471-2334-5-112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin X, Chongsuvivatwong V, Lin L, Geater A, Lijuan R. Dose-response relationship between treatment delay of smear-positive tuberculosis patients and intrahousehold transmission: a cross-sectional study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:797–804. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gebreegziabher SB, Bjune GA, Yimer SA. Total Delay Is Associated with Unfavorable Treatment Outcome among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(7): e0159579 10.1371/journal.pone.0159579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asefa A, Teshome W. Total Delay in Treatment among Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Five Primary Health Centers, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mesfin MM, James NN, Walley DJ, Amanuel G, Madeley JR. Delayed consultation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a cross sectional study of 10 DOTS districts of Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:53 10.1186/1471-2458-9-53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mesfin MM, Tasew WT, Tareke GI, Kifle TY, Karen HW, Richard JM. Delays and care seeking behavior among tuberculosis patients in Tigray of northern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2005;19:7–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussen A, Biadgilign S, Tessema F, Mohammed S, Deribe K, Deribew A. Treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in pastoralist communities in bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:320 10.1186/1756-0500-5-320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yimer SA, Bjune GA, Holm-Hansen C. Time to first consultation, diagnosis and treatment of TB among patients attending a referral hospital in Northwest, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 19 10.1186/1471-2334-14-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asefa A, Teshome W. Total Delay in Treatment among Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Five Primary Health Centers, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(7): [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asres Abyot, Jerene Degu and Deressa Wakgari. Delays to anti-tuberculosis treatment intiation among cases on directly observed treatment short course in districts of southwestern Ethiopia: BMC Infectious Diseases 2019;19:481 10.1186/s12879-019-4089-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Belay M, Bjune G, Ameni G, Abebe F. Diagnostic and treatment delay among Tuberculosis patients in Afar Region, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:369 10.1186/1471-2458-12-369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tuberculosis Research Advisory committee. Roadmap for tuberculosis operational research in Ethiopia In. Edited by (TRAC/FMOH) TRAC. Addis Ababa: FMOH; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey: 2015/16
  • 21.Tigray regional health bureau 2017 annual report. 2017/8 Mekelle, Tigray
  • 22.KNCV, WHO, JATA: The Tool to Estimate Patients’Costs In.: KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation,World Health Organization, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Virenfeldt J, Rudolf F, Camara C, A Furtado,1 V Gomes,1 P Aaby, E Petersen, C Wejse1,Treatment delay affects clinical severity of tuberculosis: a longitudinal cohort study BMJ Open 2014;4:e004818 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sendagire I, Schim Van der Loeff M, K-LJ MM, Cobelens F Long delays and missed opportunities in diagnosing smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2010;5:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lusignani LS, Quaglio G, Atzori A, Nsuka J, Grainger R, Da Cça PM, et al. Factors associated with patient and health care system delay in diagnosis for tuberculosis in the province of Luanda, Angola. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:1 10.1186/1471-2334-13-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hamza A., Demissie M., Gare S., and Teshome G., “Delay in tuberculosis diagnosis among tuberculosis patients at the three hospitals: asella, robe and abomsa of arsi zone, oromia regional state. Open Access Library Journal. 2015;2:12;1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Awoke Netsanet, Dulo Bedado, and Wudneh Feven. Total Delay in Treatment of Tuberculosis and Associated Factors among New Pulmonary TB Patients in Selected Health Facilities of Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Hindawi Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases 2019, 1:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gele AA, Bjune G, Abebe F. Pastoralism and delay in diagnosis of TB in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsegaye D, Abiy E, Mesele T, et al. Delay in Seeking Health Care and associated Factors among Pulmonary Tuberculosis cases in North Wollo Zone, Northeast Ethiopia: Arch Clin Microbiol. 2016, 7:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ngangro NN, Ngarhounoum D, Ngangro MN, Rangar N, Siriwardana MG, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis diagnistic delays in Chad: a crossectional hospital-based survey in Ndjamena and Moundou. BMC Public Health 2012;12: 513 10.1186/1471-2458-12-513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seid Abdurahaman, Metaferia Yeshi. Factors associated with treatment delay among newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients in Dessie city and surroundings, Northern Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2018;18:931 10.1186/s12889-018-5823-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zeleke Z. Z. and Trifa Z. M. Treatment delay among smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in South Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Science Journal of Public Health, 2014;2:5;402–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mondal M. N., Nazrul H. M., Chowdhury M. R. K., and Howard J., “Socio-demographic factors afecting knowledge level of tuberculosis patients in Rajshahi city, Bangladesh,” African Health Sciences, 2014, 14:4;855–865. 10.4314/ahs.v14i4.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mįnănőă SG, Mutayoba BK, Kahwa A, Kimaro G, Mtandu R, et al. The magnitude and factors associated with delays in management of smear positive tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8: 158 10.1186/1472-6963-8-158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Masjedi MR, Cheragvandi A, Hadian M, AA: Reasons for delay in the management of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. East Mediterr Health J 2002, 8(2–3):324–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mauch V, Woods N, Kirubi B, Kipruto H, Sitienei J, Klinkenberg E. Assessing access barriers to tuberculosis care with the tool to Estimate Patients' Costs: pilot results from two districts in Kenya. Bmc Public Health. 2011;11:43 10.1186/1471-2458-11-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mesfin MM, Newell JN, Madeley RJ, Mirzoev TN, Tareke IG, Kifle YT, et al. Cost implications of delays to tuberculosis diagnosis among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia. Bmc Public health. 2010;10:173 10.1186/1471-2458-10-173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ngamvithayapong J, Yanai H, Winkvist A, Diwan V: Health seeking behaviour and diagnosis for pulmonary tuberculosis in an HIV-epidemic mountainous area of Thailand. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001, 5(11):1013–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Temesgen C, Demissie M. Knowledge and practice of tuberculosis infection control among health professionals in Northwest Ethiopia; 2011. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014,14:593 10.1186/s12913-014-0593-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rabin AS, Kuchukhidze G, Sanikidze E, Kempker RR, Blumberg HM. Prescribed and self-medication use increase delays in diagnosis of tuberculosis in the country of Georgia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17(2):214–20. 10.5588/ijtld.12.0395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Elizeus Rutebemberwa

11 Feb 2020

PONE-D-19-35255

Patient and health system delay to initiate tuberculosis treatment and associated risk factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A multi-center institutional based cross sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Mr. Gebrehiwot,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 27 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Elizeus Rutebemberwa

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

1. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. Better to short the topic. Its too long.

2. data analysis and interpretation is in the satisfactory level.

3. conclusion is based on the results.

4. there is scientific value and it will add new data to the survey of TB

Reviewer #2: The article is interesting mainly because it describes as it's works the TB assistance in Northern Ethiopia. But it has some aspects needed to be corrected.

1: IT'S TOO LONG!.

A) Introduction: the last paragraph isn't correct. B) Methods and Materials: Very long. "Study setting" long, long...; C): Results: Tables numbers are bad located at the "profile of sttudy participants"; D: Discussion: too long; E: Figures: ok; E: Tables: Table 1: the variable "Family size" it's not well located as a "Mean +- SD", can't to stay were it is.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Chamila Priyangani Adikaram

Reviewer #2: Yes: M.N. Altet Gomez

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0235411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235411.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


13 Mar 2020

I would like to appreciate the reviews for their constructive and thoughtful comment on the manuscript. I have lean a lot from their comments. I would also like to thank the journal and journal editor for considering my work and giving me all the directions on how we can make the manuscript interesting to readers.

Regarding the manuscript we have tried to incorporate the comments and suggestions given from the reviewers and the academic editor. Thank you again for your time.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Frederick Quinn

16 Jun 2020

Factors associated with treatment initiation delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

PONE-D-19-35255R1

Dear Dr. Gebrehiwot,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Frederick Quinn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Your corrections are appropiate. Mainly you have shortened it. I think it may be usefool to have a best control ob TB.

Reviewer #3: Authors adequately address comments by previous reviewers

Comments:

Operational definitions: Health system delay in your manuscript is refers to both private and government health providers. Please, include in your operation definition that patient health facility visit is also include private health providers.

Study setting: Line 65: 12o 15 - 4 o 57 longitude. Please, check it for error. I think it is 12o 15 - 14 o 57 longitude.

Acknowledgements: Line: 325-329 please, revise this section.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Acceptance letter

Frederick Quinn

5 Aug 2020

PONE-D-19-35255R1

Factors associated with treatment initiation delay among new adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Gebrehiwot:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Frederick Quinn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES