Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237999

Spectrum of clinical features and genetic variants in mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene of South Indian families suffering from Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome

Geeta Madathil Govindaraj 1,2,*,#, Abhinav Jain 3,4,#, Geetha Peethambaran 1, Rahul C Bhoyar 3, Shamsudheen Karuthedath Vellarikkal 3, Arvind Ganapati 5, Pulukool Sandhya 5,¤, Athulya Edavazhippurath 1,6, Dhananjayan Dhanasooraj 6, Jayakrishnan Machinary Puthenpurayil 1, Krishnan Chakkiyar 1, Anushree Mishra 3, Arushi Batra 3,4, Anu Punnen 7, Sathish Kumar 7, Sridhar Sivasubbu 3,4, Vinod Scaria 3,4,*
Editor: Dror Sharon8
PMCID: PMC7442240  PMID: 32822427

Abstract

Hyper-IgD syndrome (HIDS, OMIM #260920) is a rare autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene. HIDS has an incidence of 1:50,000 to 1:5,000, and is thought to be prevalent mainly in northern Europe. Here, we report a case series of HIDS from India, which includes ten patients from six families who presented with a wide spectrum of clinical features such as recurrent fever, oral ulcers, rash, arthritis, recurrent diarrhea, hepatosplenomegaly, and high immunoglobulin levels. Using whole exome sequencing (WES) and/or Sanger capillary sequencing, we identified five distinct genetic variants in the MVK gene from nine patients belonging to six families. The variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic as per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines for annotation of sequence variants. Over 70% of patients in the present study had two recurrent mutations in MVK gene i.e. a nonsynonymous variant p.V377I, popularly known as the ‘Dutch mutation’, along with a splicing variant c.226+2delT in a compound heterozygous form. Identity by descent analysis in two patients with the recurrent variants identified a 6.7 MB long haplotype suggesting a founder effect in the South Indian population. Our analysis suggests that a limited number of variants account for the majority of the patients with HIDS in South India. This has implications in clinical diagnosis, as well as in the development of cost-effective approaches for genetic diagnosis and screening. To our best knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive case series of clinically and genetically characterized patients with HIDS from India.

Introduction

Autoinflammatory disorders are rare disorders characterized by dysfunction of the innate immune system, resulting in unprovoked inflammation. Hyper-IgD syndrome (HIDS) is one of the several autoinflammatory disorders and has an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance caused by pathogenic variants in the mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene [1]. Clinical features of HIDS are similar to those of hereditary periodic fever syndromes, which include recurrent fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, rash, arthritis, abdominal pain, and increased levels of biomarkers like serum amyloid A (SAA), serum IgD and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) [2]. The acronym for the Hyper-IgD syndrome, was derived from the increased level of immunoglobulin D (IgD) in all the patients in the first described case series [3], but elevated IgD is not diagnostic of HIDS [4]. A more common feature in patients with HIDS is the deficiency of mevalonate kinase. In addition to HIDS, mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) also causes a severe phenotype called mevalonic aciduria (MA). MA is associated with neurological features like developmental delay, cerebellar atrophy, ataxia, psychomotor retardation and dysmorphic features, apart from autoinflammatory symptoms The clinical presentation largely depends on the residual activity of mevalonate kinase ranging from virtually undetectable in MA to a range of detectable, but clearly deficient in HIDS and possibly resulting in premature death [5]. Mevalonate kinase phosphorylates mevalonic acid, which is required for the formation of non-sterol isoprenoids and cholesterol. This in turn is necessary for prenylation of proteins for protein [2]. Due to decreased level of mevalonate kinase, RhoA remains unprenylated and increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β results in the development of autoinflammatory symptoms [2,6].

Case series from across the world and Eurofever registry have reported less than 200 HIDS patients worldwide mainly belonging to Caucasian population [79]. It has been estimated that 75% of patients with HIDS were from Western Europe i.e. the Netherlands, France, and Italy [1012], whereas only a small number of patients with HIDS have been reported from Asian countries [2,1317]. The prevalence of HIDS has been estimated to be in the range of 1:50,000 to 1:5000 [10]. The most common variants implicated in HIDS are p.V377I and p.I268T in the MVK gene. The variants typically occur in a compound heterozygous state in most of the patients [9,11,18,19]. The carrier frequency in the Dutch population is estimated to be 1 in 65. The frequency of V377I alleles within Dutch patients diagnosed with mevalonate kinase deficiency is 42% [10].

In this report, we describe a case series of ten patients with HIDS from six South Indian families identified by clinical suspicion and confirmed in nine of the patients with genetic testing. A majority of patients have two recurrent variants i.e. p.V377I and splice mutation 226+2delT in the MVK gene in a compound heterozygous state. Analysis suggests a founder effect for these variants in the South Indian population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive report of patients with HIDS from India.

Materials and methods

Patients and clinical workup

The study has been approved by Government Medical College, Kozhikode by institutional ethical approval (Ethics No. GMCKKD/RP2017/IEC/147). Patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndromes presented at two tertiary care hospitals in South India i.e. Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala and Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu were taken up for systematic genetic analysis. Clinical characteristics of the children including age at onset, duration and interval between flares, presence of rash, lymphadenitis, arthritis, abdominal pain, diarrhea and hepatosplenomegaly were recorded in a semi-structured proforma. Inflammatory markers, total and differential counts were recorded during flares and immunoglobulin assays including IgD levels were performed. Whole exome sequencing for these patients was done at CSIR IGIB after a referral from the clinicians at the two hospitals with institutional ethical approval (Ethics No. GMCKKD/RP2017/IEC/147).

DNA isolation and whole exome sequencing

After informed consent, approximately 5 ml of blood samples were drawn by venipuncture in acid citrate dextrose (ACD) tubes (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). Patient genomic DNA was isolated using a salting out method [20] and diluted to 100 ng as a template to perform WES. WES was performed on the patient samples using the Truseq Exome library prep kit followed the standard procedure as instructed by the manufacturer (Cat no.: 20000408, Illumina Inc., SA USA). The libraries were further sequenced on HiSeq2500/NovaSeq6000 platforms in a paired-end mode with read lengths of 150bp and estimated 100x coverage.

Whole exome sequencing analysis

The raw reads were subjected to adapter and base quality trimming at a Phred score Q20 using Trimmomatic-0.38 [21]. The trimmed reads were mapped on the human reference genome version hg19/GRCh37 using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) version 0.7.17, which aligns using a hash table based algorithm for fast and precise alignment [22]. The alignments were further sorted and duplicate reads were removed using SAMtools (version 0.1.19) [23] and Picard (version 2.21.1), [24] respectively. Finally, Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK) best practices were used for variant calling using GATK (version 3.8.0) tool HaplotypeCaller [2527].

Variant annotation

The variants called were further systematically annotated using ANNOVAR (v.Date:2014-11-12 04:42:02), [28] which provides annotation from multiple databases such as RefGene [29], dbSNP (dbsnp152) [30] etc. Additionally, allele frequency was also annotated using global databases i.e. 1000 Genome Project (1000g2015aug_all), [31] which comprised of whole genome sequence data of 2504 healthy individuals from 26 populations, ESP6500 (esp6500siv2_all), [32] which comprised of 6503 whole exome data from 2203 African-American and 4300 European-American individuals, and ExAC (exac03), [33] which comprised of exome data of 60,706 unrelated individuals who have European, African, South Asian, East Asian, and admixed American (hereafter referred to as Latino) ancestry. We also added the clinical significance annotation of variants from ClinVar v.20180603 [34].

Variant prioritization

The variants were prioritized based on their potential to alter the protein structure or function (eg. missense, stop gain, stop loss, frameshift, non-frameshift, splicing, small indels, small insertion, and small deletion). These variants were further filtered to exclude variants whose minor allele frequency was greater than 5% in any of the population datasets due to the autosomal recessive mode of inheritance in the families. Further, variants were filtered based on predictions of their role in causing a disease using in-silico tools such as Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [35], Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (Polyphen-2) [36] and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) [37]. The variants present in 320 genes that are known to cause primary immunodeficiency (PID) [38] and cataloged by experts of Inborn Errors of Immunity Committee were further filtered. The variants were further examined manually, and classified. Alignments for the variants were manually visualised on the IGV browser.

Reclassification of variants as per the ACMG-AMP guidelines

The prioritized variants were manually classified as per 28 criteria for interpretation of sequence variants released by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP). According to the guidelines, each variant was classified in one of the five categories—pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), benign, or likely benign based on the evidence from sequence annotation, minor allele frequency in population datasets, computational predictions, segregation in families, and other databases according to the algorithm provided by the ACMG and AMP experts [39].

Variant validation using Sanger sequencing

Oligonucleotide primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were designed to sequence pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in the probands and their family members. We also performed Sanger sequencing in the hotspot region for the patient P6 who had not undergone WES. The primer sequences used for amplicon amplification and conditions are detailed in S1 File. The amplified products were purified using QIAquick PCR purification (Qiagen, Maryland, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and capillary sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystem, California USA).

Global screening array

DNA from 24 samples was used for performing genotyping using the Global Screening Array (GSA) (Illumina, USA) as per standard protocols provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, DNA is denatured and an isothermal amplification was performed overnight at 37 degrees. Amplified DNA is further sheared and precipitated by centrifugation at 4 degrees. The genotypes were called using the genotype calling module of GenomeStudio software (Illumina, USA) following the standard protocol.

Identity by descent

Identity by descent estimates the genetic similarity among individuals by inheritance. The pruned genotype data from 24 rare disease patient samples was used to perform multiple analysis depending on the type of disease. The 24 samples also included our patients P1 and P7, on whom we performed IBD analysis using Kinship-based INference for Genome-wide association studies (KING ver. 2.1.4 http://people.virginia.edu/∼wc9c/KING) [40]. KING predicts up to 4th degree of relationship among individuals or the IBD segment which is shared among individuals. The IBD plots for patients P1 and P7 were plotted using KING.

Results

Clinical presentation

A total of ten patients from South India suspected to have autoinflammatory diseases were included in the series. Of these, eight patients were referred for genetic evaluation from the Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala and two from the Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu. The Clinical features of these patients are well tabulated in S1 Table. All patients had recurrent episodes of fever with inflammatory manifestations of the skin, mucosae, joints and serosal surfaces with elevated acute phase reactants in the absence of infection and with no evidence of autoantibodies. There were five girls and five boys who belonged to six families, and included four pairs of siblings. Pedigree of families is depicted in S1 Fig.

All children were symptomatic before the age of sixteen months. 80% of the patients had their first symptoms during infancy, while two children had a recurrent fever in the neonatal period. All children had recurrent episodes of fever, diarrhea, hepatosplenomegaly and rash, 80% had cervical adenopathy during flares, 60% had arthritis and oral ulcers, and 60% reported that flares were triggered following vaccination. The manifestations during flares were inconsistent, some being associated with a rash, others with oral ulcers and so on. The rash varied from macular to urticarial.

Four children had bacterial infections that included pneumonia, periapical dental abscess, meningitis, septic shock and urinary tract infection. One child had recurrent molluscum contagiosum. Four of the children needed surgical procedures for choledochal cyst, low anorectal malformation, undescended testes and perianal fistula, one child required adhesiotomy for intestinal obstruction.

Apart from elevated acute phase reactants during flares, a notable feature was the elevated levels of IgA in all children and elevated IgE levels in most children for whom IgE level information was available. Serum B12 levels were elevated in seven children for whom reports were available.

The diagnostic possibilities which had been considered previously in these patients included the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, lymphoma, systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Castleman Disease, histiocytosis, autoinflammatory and immunodeficiency syndromes.

Biologicals for IL-1 blockade were not used due to its unavailability and flares were managed with NSAIDs and corticosteroids. As our patients had increased risk of infections, they were commenced on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. 75% of children showed improvement over time eg. P3 was hospitalized 4–5 times each below 5 years and between 5 and 10 years respectively but did not require admission after 10 years of age. Similarly, P4 was admitted 5–6 times below the age of 3 years but did not need admission after 6 years of age. Another reason for improvement could be cotrimoxazole prophylaxis which seemed to result in reduced frequency of febrile episodes in 80% of those in whom it was prescribed. The mortality was 10%. One child succumbed while at home after recovering from a respiratory infection for which she had been hospitalized. The cause of death could not be ascertained.

Whole exome sequencing

Whole exome sequencing was performed for five patients (P1, P2, P4, P7, and P9 from families F1, F2, F3, F5, and F6, respectively) provisionally diagnosed with an autoinflammatory disorder. An average of 63.3 million raw reads were generated for each patient. Raw reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic-0.38 and filtered reads were aligned to the human reference genome hg19/GRCh37 using BWA 0.7.17. On average 45.8 million reads for each patient were aligned on the human reference genome hg19/GRCh37 with the average mapping of 99% and average coverage of over 175X. Variant calling was done using GATK HaplotypeCaller, which generates on average 554,832 variants for each patient. Details of the data generated by the whole exome analysis for each patient has been well tabulated in S2 Table.

Variant filtering

Non-coding variants such as intergenic, intronic, ncRNA intronic, ncRNA exonic, etc, as well as synonymous SNV were filtered out. The average filtered variants were 12,661 for each patient. These variants were further filtered for minor allele frequency (MAF) < 5% in 1000 Genomes Project, ESP6500si and ExAC that brought down the average number of variants to 1,918 for each patient. We prioritized an average of 27 genetic variants that were present in the 320 primary immunodeficiency genes in each patient for further downstream analysis. Variants were further prioritized based on the phenotype-genotype correlation that mainly has compound heterozygous inheritance that led to 2, 2, 1, 2, and 2 variants in the MVK gene for P1, P2, P4, P7, and P9 patients respectively. The prioritized variants that could lead to HIDS in patients after at each filtering step have been tabulated in the S2 Table. Since HIDS is an autosomal recessive disorder and typically caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants, we further performed Sanger capillary sequencing to examine whether compound heterozygous variants were in cis or trans alignment with each other and also to validate WES results.

Variant validation using Sanger capillary sequencing

We performed PCR amplification using the primers as detailed previously followed by Sanger capillary sequencing for all patients who had undergone exome sequencing. For P6, we did not have the parents’ DNA samples. We could not validate the variants in P8 of family 5 as we did not have an adequate DNA sample. However, since P7 and P8 belong to the same family and manifested similar clinical features, we hypothesized that P8 also inherited the same genetic mutation as P7. In other patients, we found variants were either trans compound heterozygous or homozygous segregation in the family. Sanger capillary sequencing results are represented for each of the patients and families in S1 Fig. The variants are also tabulated in Table 1. The linear gene and 3-dimensional protein visualization with the mutation sites by PyMOL (ver 2.4) [41] have been represented in Fig 1.

Table 1. ACMG classification of prioritized variants in patients with HIDS.

Patient Family Gene Chr:pos Variant SNPid Coding change ACMG Criterion ACMG Classification Genotype
P1 F1 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM2, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110034320 G>A rs28934897 c.1129G>A:p.V377I PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5, BP4 Pathogenic (II)
P2 F2 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM2, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110023912 A>G rs104895364 c.613A>G: p.N205D PM1, PM2, PP1, PP3 Likely pathogenic (V)
P3 F2 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM2, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110023912 A>G rs104895364 c.613A>G: p.N205D PM1, PM2, PP1, PP3 Likely pathogenic (V)
P4 F3 MVK chr12:110034288 A>G . c.1097A>G:p.D366G PM1, PM2, PP1, PP3 (Yellow) Likely pathogenic (V) Homozygous
P5 F3 MVK chr12:110034288 A>G . c.1097A>G:p.D366G PM1, PM2, PP1, PP3 Likely pathogenic (V) Homozygous
P6 F4 MVK chr12:110034320 G>A rs28934897 c.1129G>A:p.V377I PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5, BP4 Pathogenic (II) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110023876 G>C . c.577G>C: p.E193Q PM1, PM2, PM3, PP3 Likely pathogenic (IV)
P7 F5 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM1, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110034320 G>A rs28934897 c.1129G>A:p.V377I PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5, BP4 Pathogenic (II)
P9 F6 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM2, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110034320 G>A rs28934897 c.1129G>A:p.V377I PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5, BP4 Pathogenic (II)
P10 F6 MVK chr12:110013951 GT>G . c.226+2delT PVS1, PM2, PM3 Pathogenic (1b) Compound Heterozygous
MVK chr12:110034320 G>A rs28934897 c.1129G>A:p.V377I PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5, BP4 Pathogenic (II)

Fig 1. Mutation in the MVK gene in linear and in 3-dimensional Mvk protein visualization.

Fig 1

A) Linear model of MVK gene with a mutation associated with Hyper-IgD syndrome in South Indian patients. B) 3-dimensional Mvk protein visualization with the mutation sites associated with Hyper-IgD syndrome in South Indian patients.

Classification of prioritized variants as per the ACMG/AMP guidelines

All the variants were systematically evaluated as per the 28 parameters in the ACMG/AMP guidelines. All the patients affected by HIDS had pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in MVK gene as per the ACMG/AMP guidelines. We found two pathogenic mutations c.226+2delT and p.V377I which were recurring in a compound heterozygous state (trans configuration) in our patients. Five patients (P1, P6, P7, P9, and P10) carried p.V377I mutation in a compound heterozygous state with splice site mutation c.226+2delT in four patients (P1, P7, P9, and P10) whereas P6 carried another nonsynonymous mutation p.E193Q in a compound heterozygous state and classified as likely pathogenic. The splicing mutation c.226+2delT was also found in a trans compound heterozygous state with p.N205D in two siblings P2 and P3 of family 2, which was classified as likely pathogenic. A homozygous nonsynonymous mutation i.e. D366G has been classified as likely pathogenic in patients P4 and P5 of family 3, in which there was a third degree consanguineous parentage. The prioritized variants along with their ACMG annotation have been tabulated in Table 1.

Identity by descent analysis

The genotyping dataset generated on the Global screening array had a genotype call rate of ~99%. In both of our patients P1 and P7, we could not find any mutual blood relationship up to 4th degree, but we found both of them shared the haplotype that spans the genomic loci of 6.7 megabases (MB) at chr12:107138141–114000478 and consists of 1407 Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) on the array. The genomic loci overlapped with the recurrent variants (p.V377I and c.226+2delT). The shared haplotype between two patients at the genomic level in different chromosome has been well represented in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Haplotype sharing among P1 and P7 patients at the genome level.

Fig 2

Shared segmental SNVs are represented in blue in different chromosomes of P1 and P7 patients. Red outline at chr12 of a shared haplotype among P1 and P7 composed of both pathogenic variants which were found to be recurrent in patients with HIDS from South India.

Discussion

In the present report, we describe one of the largest case series of patients with HIDS from South India, which provides a unique view of the clinical features. There were four pairs of affected siblings, who had a similar spectrum of symptoms, but varied in their age at presentation and severity. We compared clinical features and genetic mutation of our cohort to the cohorts which have more than five patients reported in different populations which include Italian [12,42,43], French and Belgian [44], Dutch [45], Japanese [46], German [47], and other cohorts, which mainly represent European patients [7,8]. The comparison of patients with HIDS of different populations with our study has been well represented in Table 2.

Table 2. Comparison of patients with HIDS of our cohort across different population groups.

Reference Haar et al. 2016 [7] Hilst et al. 2008 [8] Doglio et al. 2013 [42] Bader-Meunier et al. 2011 [44] D’Osualdo et al. 2005 [12] Frenkel et al. 2001 [45] Tanaka et al. 2019 [46] Stabile et al. 2013 [43] Lainka et al. 2012 [47]
Population Mainly European Mainly European Italian French and Belgian Italian Dutch Japanese Italian German Present study
Number of Patients 114 103 56 50 15 14 10 10 8 10
Gender 53M 61F 52M 51F 29M 27F 21M 29F 9M 6F 9M 5F 4M 6F 4M 6F 4M 4F 5M 5F
Average Age (years) NA 19 (2–74) 13.3 ± 8.5 21.6 (1–58) 10 (2–27) 9.4 (2–20) 8.3 (0.6–15.3) NA 7 (2–14) 6.45 (1.5–15)
Disease onset (months) 6 6 (0–10) 10.5 ± 15.3 (1–108) 24.5 (0.03–504) 10 (1–24) 15 (0–160) 1 (0–3) 42.6 (2–110) 13.5 (12–24) 6.23 (0.5–24)
Duration of fever (days) 4 NA NA 3.7 (1–10) 4.5 (3–7) 4 (3–7) 4 to 7 5 5.5 (3–12) 3–7
Number of spikes/year 11 to 15 7 to > 12 13.8 ± 5.4 (3–30) NA 12.5 (10–18) 16 (6–26) 7 to 11 NA 4–52 20 (12–24)
Ulcers n/m (%) 18/114 (16) 50/103 (48.5) NA 8/49 (16.3) NA NA NA 6/10 (60) 2/8 (25) 6/10 (60)
Chills n/m (%) NA 65/103 (62.7) NA NA 6/15 (40) 6/14 (35.7) NA NA NA NA
Fever on vaccination n/m (%) 38/99 (38.3) NA NA NA NA 13/14 (92.8) NA NA NA 4/10 (40)
Abdominal pain n/m (%) 98/111 (88.2) 88/103 (85.4) NA 30/49 (61.2) 15/15 (100) 12/14 (85.7) 4/10 (40) 9/10 (90) 8/8 (100) 4/10 (40)
Diarrhoea n/m (%) 93/111 (83.7) 74/103 (71.6) NA 34/49 (69.3) 12/15 (80) 12/14 (85.7) 6/10 (60) NA 6/8 (75) 10/10 (100)
Vomiting n/m (%) 76/110 (69) 73/103 (70.9) NA 21/49 (42.8) NA 11/14 (78.5) 6/10 (60) NA 6/8 (75) 3/10 (30)
Arthralgia n/m (%) 80/113 (70.7) 86/103 (83.5) NA 33/49 (67.3) 12/15 (80) 12/14 (85.7) 2/10 (20) 9/10 (90) 4/8 (50) NA
Arthritis n/m (%) 31/109 (28.4) 57/103 (55.3) NA 20/49 (40.8) NA 4/14 (28.5) 2/10 (20) NA NA 6/10 (60)
Myalgia n/m (%) 64/112 (57.1) NA NA 10/49 (20.4) 9/15 (60) NA NA NA 2/8 (25) 6/8 (75)
Rash n/m (%) 43/111 (38.7) NA NA 23/35 (65.7) 7/15 (46.6) 11/14 (78.5) 9/10 (90) 5/10 (50) 5/8 (62.5) 9/10 (90)
Lymphadenopathy n/m (%) 96/113 (84.9) 90/103 (87.4) NA 35/49 (71.4) 15/15 (100) 12/14 (85.7) 7/10 (70) 10/10 (100) 7/8 (87.5) 8/10 (80)
Splenomegaly n/m (%) NA 34/103 (32.4) NA 31/49 (63.2) 8/15 (53.3) 7/14 (50) 3/10 (30) NA NA 10/10 (100)
MVK mutation n/m (%) 114/114 (100) 103/103 (100) 100 49/50 (98) 15/15 (100) 11/14 (78.5) 5/10 (50) 7/10 (70) 8/8 (100) 9/10 (90)
Recurrent Mutation V377I n/m (%) 96/114 (84.2) 52/103 (50) 42/56 (75) 36/49 (73) 12/15 (80) 11/11 (100) NA 2/7 (28.5) 6/8 (75) 5/10 (50)
Second Recurrent Mutation n/m (%) 29/114 (25.4) I268T 15/103 (14.7) I268T NA 8/49 (16.3) I268T 4/15 (26.6) I268T 4/11 (36.4) I268T NA 5/7 (71.4) I268T 2/8 (25) I268T, 2/8 (25) R277H 6/10 (60) c.226+2T

NA: Not Applicable.

Notably, age at disease onset varied widely among different populations. In this regard, South Indian patients were similar to the European population. However, oral ulcers, myalgia and splenomegaly were significantly lower in the cohort of European patients in comparison to South Indian. As reported in previous studies of the European cohorts, 80% of children were symptomatic from infancy, and two children had a neonatal-onset [48]. Rash, diarrhoea, hepatosplenomegaly were seen in 100% of our patients. So in a patient with the triad of symptoms and recurrent fever, diagnosis of HIDS should be strongly considered in south Indian patients.

An increased frequency of infections of possible bacterial etiology was observed in our patients, similar to French, Italian, and Belgian reports, which have indicated enhanced susceptibility to pneumococcal infections [8,12,44]. Elevated levels of mevalonic acid in the plasma due to deficient activity of mevalonate kinase have been postulated to favor the persistence of S. pneumoniae in lungs and serum. Immunization against pneumococcal infections is therefore strongly recommended in patients with HIDS. This is a pointer to the fact that HIDS is associated with immune deficiency apart from autoinflammation. The reduction in the number of flares in the majority of children in whom cotrimoxazole was started as antimicrobial prophylaxis is also a pointer in this direction, but requires more studies to confirm its benefit, since it was a subjective observation of the treating clinician. It would be a useful and simple modality that can be tried to reduce the frequency of flares, especially in regions where biologicals are either not readily available or where there are cost constraints.

Although HIDS is usually unassociated with impaired growth, 60% of children had low height for age, possibly due to recurrent and frequent inflammatory episodes, and 50% had mild motor developmental delay. Severe anemia requiring packed red cell transfusions was a feature in more than half of the children and is attributable to the frequent and severe inflammatory episodes. A common feature observed on follow up was improvement of symptoms with age, that has been previously described [49].

Due to the limited availability of IgD assay, it was possible to estimate levels in only 3 patients, whose IgD levels were elevated. Estimation of IgD levels as a pointer to the need to look for an MVK variant is not recommended due to its poor predictive value and specificity. Elevated IgD levels may be found in certain infections, malignancies, and inherited disorders and is now considered to be an epiphenomenon [4,50]. Elevated IgA levels have been reported to occur in HIDS, due to an increase in polymeric-IgA and was observed in all our patients. This is a useful diagnostic clue [51]. IgE levels were elevated in all children in whom it had been assayed, a finding that has not been reported earlier and would need further studies to be confirmed.

Several patients went through a diagnostic odyssey before whole exome sequencing revealed the diagnosis. Among our patients, 40% were diagnosed at or above the age of 10 years. The median time from onset to diagnosis has been reported to be 14 years in patients with no positive family history and as many as a third of patients with HIDS have been previously misdiagnosed [8]. This is because the rarity of the disease and consequent lack of familiarity with the treating physician mandates the exclusion of more common diseases upfront. The non—specific nature of symptoms is also a contributing factor. One child underwent laparotomy with adhesiotomy and appendicectomy. Confirmation of the diagnosis of HIDS also helps prevent unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures [52].

One child in our cohort succumbed to the disease while at home, and hence the exact cause could not be determined. Deaths of three patients between 2 and 3 years of age have been reported earlier due to multiple organ failure and macrophage activation syndrome with staphylococcal sepsis [8,44,53].

The new Eurofever / PRINTO classification criteria stipulate the presence of one among three clinical criteria including gastrointestinal symptoms, cervical lymphadenitis, and aphthous stomatitis along with a confirmatory mutation in the MVK gene, which was satisfied by all the patients except P8 due to unavailability of the sample [54]. We hypothesize that P8 will have the same mutation as P7, as both of them are siblings with similar clinical features.

Genetically, South Indian patients have two recurrent mutations, p.V377I and c.226+2delT, where V377I has been widely reported in all the populations except Japanese. The c.226+2delT is a unique mutation found exclusively in the Indian subcontinent, only been reported once previously in South Indian patients [13]. All the patients were found to carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in MVK gene described previously in HIDS either in a compound heterozygous or homozygous state. Out of nine patients genetically evaluated in our study, five patients from four unrelated families had V377I mutation (rs28934897) along with splice site mutation c.226+2delT and one patient had the splice variant along with the with non synonymous mutation p.E193Q. The V377I (rs28934897), is also popularly known as the ‘Dutch variant’ as its carrier frequency in Dutch population is quite high i.e. 1:153 individuals. Patients with HIDS had V377I mutation in homozygous or trans compound heterozygous states around the world have a similar phenotype [7,55]. It is also prevalent in other parts of the globe which involves Italy, France, Belgium, Germany, Spain, and Arabic countries [610,12,4244,47,5663]. It has low allele frequency in the control population i.e. ~0.001 in both gnomAD and Esp6500, and is absent in 1000 Genome Project. In-silico tools predicted it as tolerated by SIFT and benign by PolyPhen, where CADD score > 20 which predicted it as disease causing.

The second recurrent variant is a splice mutation c.226+2delT in MVK gene in six patients from four unrelated families. This mutation has been reported once in a South Indian family who was also from Kerala, India inherited in a compound heterozygous state with p.V377I [13] as in four patients (P1, P7, P9, and P10) from three unrelated families. It is absent in the control populations i.e. 1000 Genome Project, gnomAD, and Esp6500. This mutation may lead to the retention of intron 3 or skipping of exon 4 in the complementary DNA which in turn affects mRNA stability or protein activity. There are reports of splicing mutation, 2bp upstream to our mutation i.e. c.227-1G>A that resulted in exon skipping and affects protein activity [14,64]. Other nonsynonymous variations described in this case series are N205D (rs104895364), E193Q and D366G. N205D mutation has been reported around the globe in trans compound heterozygous manner with different mutation worldwide including p.V377I from Turkey [65], p.K13Q from France [66], Y114fs from the Netherlands [55], and c.382_383 delAG* from Japan [46]. N205D has very low allele frequency in the control population i.e. 3.18e-05 in gnomAD, and 4.99e-05 in Esp6500, and is absent in 1000 Genome Project. It falls in the GHMP kinase domain of MVK protein, and affects the protein folding [67]. Computational tools (SIFT, PolyPhen, and CADD) predicted it as pathogenic. Similarly p.E193Q has been predicted as pathogenic by computational tools and it falls in the GHMP kinase domain of MVK protein, which disrupts the catalytic and binding of the MVK functionally shown in rats and 293T cells [67,68]. However, there is only one prior report of p.D366G homozygous mutation and this was again from Kerala, India [69]. It is absent in the control population databases, and predicted as pathogenic by SIFT and CADD, whereas benign by PolyPhen. It falls in the GHMP kinase domain of MVK.

Patients P1, P7, P9, and P10 had the same variants c.226+2delT and p.V377I with similar clinical characteristics, but with variable severity, the duration and frequency of flares also differed. p.N205D variant was found to be associated with the occurrence of recurrent arthritis. Painful episodes of cervical lymphadenitis were a prominent feature in the two siblings who were homozygous for the p.D366G variant. Lymphoproliferation was marked in children with the splicing variant.

In this study, we considered WES, in contrast to targeted sequencing of MVK gene, due to the fact that targeted sequencing was not widely available, was expensive and time consuming. The study also enabled development of a targeted capillary sequencing based approach encompassing the prevalent variants in the population, because a genetic diagnosis is not only essential for diagnosis, but also for genetic counseling, and for screening and diagnosis of related members of the family.

In summary, the present report on patients with HIDS emphasizes the variability of clinical presentation and the genetically heterogeneous nature of the disease. We found two recurrent mutations from South India which were inherited in the trans compound heterozygous states could be considered as potential founder MVK variants in the South Indian populations. However, considering the variability and overlapping clinical features, clinical diagnosis of HIDS may not be possible in all cases as seen in this case series. When the autoinflammatory disease is suspected, WES must be considered unless the clinical features and other labs are very typical of HIDS. In a South Indian patient who manifests autoinflammatory features typical of HIDS Sanger sequencing for V377I and c.226+2delT in MVK gene, which are the two most common mutations described could be considered.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Pedigrees and chromatograms for the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants typed in the family using Sanger capillary sequencing.

Samples marked $-were analysed using whole exome sequencing and marked # were analysed using Sanger capillary sequencing.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Clinical features of patients with HIDS in the present cohort.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Data summary of exome sequencing for five patients with HIDS.

(XLSX)

S1 File. Primer sequence for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing with coordinates (GRCh37 or hg19).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge Bani Jolly, Disha Sharma, and Mukta Poojary for suggestions, which enriched the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data involved in the study will be provided upon request, as it could be potentially identifiable and contains patient sensitive information. Access to the data could be requested by mailing to Dr. Jyoti Yadav (j.yadav@igib.res.in) who is the convener of the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of CSIR-IGIB.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR, India) through MLP1801 (RareGen-CSIR India) and Science and Engineering Research Board EMR/2016/006828/HS (PAC Health Sciences). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Drenth JP, Cuisset L, Grateau G, Vasseur C, van de Velde-Visser SD, de Jong JG, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding mevalonate kinase cause hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome. International Hyper-IgD Study Group. Nat Genet. 1999. June;22(2):178–81. 10.1038/9696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mulders-Manders CM, Simon A. Hyper-IgD syndrome/mevalonate kinase deficiency: what is new? Semin Immunopathol. 2015. July;37(4):371–6. 10.1007/s00281-015-0492-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Der Meer JM, Radl J, Meyer CLM, Vossen J, Van Nieuwkoop J, Lobatto S, et al. HYPERIMMUNOGLOBULINAEMIA D AND PERIODIC FEVER: A NEW SYNDROME. Lancet. 1984. May;323(8386):1087–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ammouri W, Cuisset L, Rouaghe S, Rolland M-O, Delpech M, Grateau G, et al. Diagnostic value of serum immunoglobulinaemia D level in patients with a clinical suspicion of hyper IgD syndrome. Rheumatology. 2007. October;46(10):1597–600. 10.1093/rheumatology/kem200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haas D, Hoffmann GF. Mevalonate kinase deficiencies: from mevalonic aciduria to hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006. April 26;1:13 10.1186/1750-1172-1-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Messer L, Alsaleh G, Georgel P, Carapito R, Waterham HR, Dali-Youcef N, et al. Homozygosity for the V377I mutation in mevalonate kinase causes distinct clinical phenotypes in two sibs with hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome (HIDS). RMD Open. 2016. March 7;2(1):e000196 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ter Haar NM, Jeyaratnam J, Lachmann HJ, Simon A, Brogan PA, Doglio M, et al. The Phenotype and Genotype of Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency: A Series of 114 Cases From the Eurofever Registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016. November;68(11):2795–805. 10.1002/art.39763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van der Hilst JCH, Bodar EJ, Barron KS, Frenkel J, Drenth JPH, van der Meer JWM, et al. Long-term follow-up, clinical features, and quality of life in a series of 103 patients with hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome. Medicine. 2008. November;87(6):301–10. 10.1097/MD.0b013e318190cfb7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Houten SM, Koster J, Romeijn GJ, Frenkel J, Di Rocco M, Caruso U, et al. Organization of the mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene and identification of novel mutations causing mevalonic aciduria and hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001. April;9(4):253–9. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Houten SM, van Woerden CS, Wijburg FA, Wanders RJA, Waterham HR. Carrier frequency of the V377I (1129G>A) MVK mutation, associated with Hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome, in the Netherlands. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003. February;11(2):196–200. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cuisset L, Drenth JP, Simon A, Vincent MF, van der Velde Visser S, van der Meer JW, et al. Molecular analysis of MVK mutations and enzymatic activity in hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001. April;9(4):260–6. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.D’Osualdo A, Picco P, Caroli F, Gattorno M, Giacchino R, Fortini P, et al. MVK mutations and associated clinical features in Italian patients affected with autoinflammatory disorders and recurrent fever. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005. March;13(3):314–20. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lawrence A, Hol F, Aggarwal A, Drenth JPH. Hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D syndrome in India: report of two siblings with a novel mutation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006. December;65(12):1674–6. 10.1136/ard.2006.054494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeng K, Zhang Q-G, Li L, Duan Y, Liang Y-H. Splicing mutation in MVK is a cause of porokeratosis of Mibelli. Arch Dermatol Res. 2014. October;306(8):749–55. 10.1007/s00403-014-1465-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Correa ARE, Gupta N, Bagri N, Vignesh P, Alam S, Yamaguchi S. Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency as Cause of Periodic Fever in Two Siblings. Indian Pediatr. 2020. February 15;57(2):180–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abdulla MC, Hawkins PN, Alungal J, Rowczenio D. Hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome in an Indian family undiagnosed for 11 years. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017. December;20(12):2236–7. 10.1111/1756-185X.12811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sinha A, Waterham HR, Sreedhar KV, Jain V. Novel mutations causing hyperimmunoglobulin D and periodic fever syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2012. July;49(7):583–5. 10.1007/s13312-012-0099-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Houten SM, Frenkel J, Kuis W, Wanders RJ, Poll-The BT, Waterham HR. Molecular basis of classical mevalonic aciduria and the hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome: high frequency of 3 mutations in the mevalonate kinase gene. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2000. June;23(4):367–70. 10.1023/a:1005687415434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Houten SM, Frenkel J, Rijkers GT, Wanders RJA, Kuis W, Waterham HR. Temperature dependence of mutant mevalonate kinase activity as a pathogenic factor in hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2002. December 1;11(25):3115–24. 10.1093/hmg/11.25.3115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988. February 11;16(3):1215 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014. August 1;30(15):2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009. July 15;25(14):1754–60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009. August 15;25(16):2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Picard Tools—By Broad Institute [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 1]. http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard
  • 25.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010. September;20(9):1297–303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011. May;43(5):491–8. 10.1038/ng.806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010. September;38(16):e164 10.1093/nar/gkq603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. January;35(Database issue):D61–5. 10.1093/nar/gkl842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001. January 1;29(1):308–11. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015. October 1;526(7571):68–74. 10.1038/nature15393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Exome Variant Server [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 1]. http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/
  • 33.Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016. August 18;536(7616):285–91. 10.1038/nature19057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018. January 4;46(D1):D1062–7. 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sim N-L, Kumar P, Hu J, Henikoff S, Schneider G, Ng PC. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012. July;40(Web Server issue):W452–7. 10.1093/nar/gks539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010. April;7(4):248–9. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O’Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet. 2014. March;46(3):310–5. 10.1038/ng.2892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bousfiha A, Jeddane L, Picard C, Ailal F, Bobby Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, et al. The 2017 IUIS Phenotypic Classification for Primary Immunodeficiencies. J Clin Immunol. 2018. January;38(1):129–43. 10.1007/s10875-017-0465-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015. May;17(5):405–24. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Galatenko OA, Terekhova LP. [Isolation of antibiotic-producing Actinomycetes from soil samples exposed to UV light]. Antibiot Khimioter. 1990. November;35(11):6–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rigsby RE, Parker AB. Using the PyMOL application to reinforce visual understanding of protein structure. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2016. September 10;44(5):433–7. 10.1002/bmb.20966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Doglio M, Federici S, Tommasini A, Meini A, Cattalini M, Obici L, et al. PReS-FINAL-2232: Long-term follow-up in a national cohort of MKD patients: search for clinical predictors of a spontaneous improvement. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013. December 5;11(2):P222. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stabile A, Compagnone A, Napodano S, Raffaele CGL, Patti M, Rigante D. Mevalonate kinase genotype in children with recurrent fevers and high serum IgD level. Rheumatol Int. 2013. December;33(12):3039–42. 10.1007/s00296-012-2577-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bader-Meunier B, Florkin B, Sibilia J, Acquaviva C, Hachulla E, Grateau G, et al. Mevalonate kinase deficiency: a survey of 50 patients. Pediatrics. 2011. July;128(1):e152–9. 10.1542/peds.2010-3639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Frenkel J, Houten SM, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ, Rijkers GT, Duran M, et al. Clinical and molecular variability in childhood periodic fever with hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D. Rheumatology. 2001. May;40(5):579–84. 10.1093/rheumatology/40.5.579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tanaka T, Yoshioka K, Nishikomori R, Sakai H, Abe J, Yamashita Y, et al. National survey of Japanese patients with mevalonate kinase deficiency reveals distinctive genetic and clinical characteristics. Mod Rheumatol. 2019. January;29(1):181–7. 10.1080/14397595.2018.1442639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lainka E, Neudorf U, Lohse P, Timmann C, Bielak M, Stojanov S, et al. Incidence and clinical features of hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome (HIDS) and spectrum of mevalonate kinase (MVK) mutations in German children. Rheumatol Int. 2012. October;32(10):3253–60. 10.1007/s00296-011-2180-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Drenth JP, Haagsma CJ, van der Meer JW. Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome. The clinical spectrum in a series of 50 patients. International Hyper-IgD Study Group. Medicine. 1994. May;73(3):133–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.van der Meer JWM. 30 years hids-Travels between bedside and bench. Temperature (Austin). 2015. January;2(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.de Dios García-Díaz J, Alvarez-Blanco MJ. High IgD could be a nonpathogenetic diagnostic marker of the hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001. May;86(5):587 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62909-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Klasen IS, Göertz JH, van de Wiel GA, Weemaes CM, van der Meer JW, Drenth JP. Hyper-immunoglobulin A in the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001. January;8(1):58–61. 10.1128/CDLI.8.1.58-61.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Grose C. Periodic fever in children with hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and mevalonate kinase mutations. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005. June;24(6):573–4. 10.1097/01.inf.0000164797.87474.b5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang S. Natural history of mevalonate kinase deficiency: a literature review. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016. May 4;14(1):30 10.1186/s12969-016-0091-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Federici S, Sormani MP, Ozen S, Lachmann HJ, Amaryan G, Woo P, et al. Evidence-based provisional clinical classification criteria for autoinflammatory periodic fevers. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015. May;74(5):799–805. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mandey SHL, Schneiders MS, Koster J, Waterham HR. Mutational spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations in mevalonate kinase deficiency. Hum Mutat. 2006. August;27(8):796–802. 10.1002/humu.20361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jesus AA, Fujihira E, Watase M, Terreri MT, Hilario MO, Carneiro-Sampaio M, et al. Hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes: a Brazilian multicenter study. J Clin Immunol. 2012. October;32(5):922–32. 10.1007/s10875-012-9688-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Houten SM, Kuis W, Duran M, de Koning TJ, van Royen-Kerkhof A, Romeijn GJ, et al. Mutations in MVK, encoding mevalonate kinase, cause hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Nat Genet. 1999. June;22(2):175–7. 10.1038/9691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hammoudeh M. Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome in an Arab child. Clin Rheumatol. 2005. February;24(1):92–4. 10.1007/s10067-004-0953-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Moussa T, Aladbe B, Taha RZ, Remmers EF, El-Shanti H, Fathalla BM. Overlap of familial Mediterranean fever and hyper-IgD syndrome in an Arabic kindred. J Clin Immunol. 2015. April;35(3):249–53. 10.1007/s10875-015-0140-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ruiz Gomez A, Couce ML, Garcia-Villoria J, Torres A, Baña Souto A, Yagüe J, et al. Clinical, genetic, and therapeutic diversity in 2 patients with severe mevalonate kinase deficiency. Pediatrics. 2012. February;129(2):e535–9. 10.1542/peds.2010-2192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hyper-IgD and periodic fever syndrome: a new MVK mutation (p.R277G) associated with a severe phenotype. Gene. 2014. June 1;542(2):217–20. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Abreu TT. [Periodic fever: the first Portuguese case-report of hyper-IgD syndrome (HIDS)]. Acta Med Port. 2004. September;17(5):391–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Karatsourakis TP, Oikonomaki KN, Tzioufas AG, Moutsopoulos HM. Periodic fevers in adult Greeks: clinical and molecular presentation. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014. July;32(4 Suppl 84):S45–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mizuno T, Sakai H, Nishikomori R, Oshima K, Ohara O, Hata I, et al. Novel mutations of MVK gene in Japanese family members affected with hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2012. December;32(12):3761–4. 10.1007/s00296-011-2225-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Çakan M, Aktay-Ayaz N, Keskindemirci G, Karadağ ŞG. Two cases of periodic fever syndrome with coexistent mevalonate kinase and Mediterranean fever gene mutations. Turk J Pediatr. 2017;59(4):467–70. 10.24953/turkjped.2017.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Galeotti C, Meinzer U, Quartier P, Rossi-Semerano L, Bader-Meunier B, Pillet P, et al. Efficacy of interleukin-1-targeting drugs in mevalonate kinase deficiency. Rheumatology. 2012. October;51(10):1855–9. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yang D, Shipman LW, Roessner CA, Scott AI, Sacchettini JC. Structure of the Methanococcus jannaschii mevalonate kinase, a member of the GHMP kinase superfamily. J Biol Chem. 2002. March 15;277(11):9462–7. 10.1074/jbc.M110787200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nair AK, Young MA, Menon KMJ. Regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA expression by mevalonate kinase—role of the catalytic center in mRNA recognition. FEBS J. 2008. July;275(13):3397–407. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06490.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Naseer M, Taur P, Parmar A, Kanvinde P, Mudaliar S, Dighe N, et al. Hyper IGD syndrome: A case report. Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal. 2016;1(2):S17. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dror Sharon

19 May 2020

PONE-D-20-12540

Spectrum of clinical features and genetic variants in mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene of Indian families suffering from Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Scaria,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jul 03 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dror Sharon, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a valuable contribution to the literature on HIDS (Hyper IgD Syndrome) or MVK deficiency. By presenting a small but by HIDS standard large case series with both clinical and molecular data it is a very useful contribution. The ten patients from six families represent the clinical spectrum previously reported with the additional information on the difficulty making the correct diagnosis and the other disorders that had been entertained before the molecular studies clearly identified the proper defect. Virtually nothing was said about outcome or treatment perhaps because the standard therapies that block IL1 (anakinra and canakinumab) are apparently unavailable or they plan to write another paper with that data. Surprisingly the authors state that the patients did well whereas untreated HIDS is typically associated with poor growth and development. None of the patients had the more severe form of the disease called mevalonic aciduria which is associated with severe and life threatening manifestations in infancy but not the periodic fever syndrome that HIDS displays.

I liked tables 1 and 2 but not Figure 1 which I would like to replace with a linear model of the gene with the mutation sites indicated. Another figure which would be useful is a three dimensional model of the enyme with the mutation sites identified. A little more focussed discussion of the deletion mutation and its effect on enzyme function or enzyme stability would have been interesting. The sequencing data is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance requiring either homozygosity or compound heterozygote suggesting single mutations even of the deletion variant have enough residual activity to not be clinically symptomatic.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. Authors have desribed the clinical and molecular spectrum of Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome. I have few comments-

Introduction-

Second para- 4th line- Authors could add more Indian refernces on MVK disorder. Some of the important references are as follows-

1: Correa ARE, Gupta N, Bagri N, Vignesh P, Alam S, Yamaguchi S. Mevalonate

Kinase Deficiency as Cause of Periodic Fever in Two Siblings. Indian Pediatr.

2020 Feb 15;57(2):180-181. PubMed PMID: 32060250

2: Jain A, Misra DP, Sharma A, Wakhlu A, Agarwal V, Negi VS. Vasculitis and

vasculitis-like manifestations in monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes. Rheumatol

Int. 2018 Jan;38(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3839-6. Epub 2017 Oct 14.

Review. PubMed PMID: 29032440.

3: Abdulla MC, Hawkins PN, Alungal J, Rowczenio D. Hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome

in an Indian family undiagnosed for 11 years. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017

Dec;20(12):2236-2237. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12811. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PubMed PMID:

26620804.

4: Sinha A, Waterham HR, Sreedhar KV, Jain V. Novel mutations causing

hyperimmunoglobulin D and periodic fever syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2012

Jul;49(7):583-5. PubMed PMID: 22885443.

Methods-

Clinical work up- Wheteher any biochemical assays like GCMS was performed ?In how many a clinical diagnosis of Hyper IgD was made in the absence of igD levels.

Variant prortization- Generally a MAF of 1% is used. The reason behind using MAF of 5%is may be specified.

Table 1- Elevated IgD is seen in patient 1 only.was it performed in one patient ? or was it normal in others. I understand that it is not widely available.

Information on consanguinity should be added in the table.

Highlight the significance of elevated Vit B12

Discussion-

Did authors find any genotype pheotype correlation

Authors have stated that p.V377I and c.226+2delT are the common mutations in Indian subcontinent. This should be stated after incorporating the complete Indian data.

Was there any analysis done to prove the founder effect?

I think this line at the end of discussion ("In a patient who manifests

......... for V377I and c.226+2delT in MVK)may not be generalisable as Indian population is very heterogenous and this study mainly included the south Indian population .

General comments-

Minor typos in intorduction and discussion

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237999.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Jul 2020

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: Thanks for pointing that out, we have made the changes according to the PLOS ONE’s style.

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Response: We apologize for not making it clear. We have updated the cover letter with the information of data availability on request by the IGIB Institutional Ethics committee with their contact details.

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and does the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copy or edit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a valuable contribution to the literature on HIDS (Hyper IgD Syndrome) or MVK deficiency. By presenting a small but by HIDS standard large case series with both clinical and molecular data it is a very useful contribution. The ten patients from six families represent the clinical spectrum previously reported with the additional information on the difficulty making the correct diagnosis and the other disorders that had been entertained before the molecular studies clearly identified the proper defect. Virtually nothing was said about outcome or treatment perhaps because the standard therapies that block IL1 (anakinra and canakinumab) are apparently unavailable or they plan to write another paper with that data. Surprisingly the authors state that the patients did well whereas untreated HIDS is typically associated with poor growth and development. None of the patients had the more severe form of the disease called mevalonic aciduria which is associated with severe and life threatening manifestations in infancy but not the periodic fever syndrome that HIDS displays.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have included more information regarding the clinical features, treatment, infection, previous diagnosis, development delay, deaths etc. for all the patients in the section on results and discussed them. The clinical features with other clinical details are summarized in the Supplementary Table 1.

I liked tables 1 and 2 but not Figure 1 which I would like to replace with a linear model of the gene with the mutation sites indicated. Another figure which would be useful is a three dimensional model of the enzyme with the mutation sites identified. A little more focussed discussion of the deletion mutation and its effect on enzyme function or enzyme stability would have been interesting. The sequencing data is consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance requiring either homozygosity or compound heterozygote suggesting single mutations even if the deletion variant have enough residual activity to not be clinically symptomatic.

Response: We thank the reviewer for their suggestion. We have included both the figures i.e. linear model of the gene with the mutation sites indicated. Also 3D model of the enzyme with mutation sites identified using PyMOL in Fig 1. We put the Sanger sequencing with pedigree figure in the supplementary figures. We have also discussed the deletion mutation effect on protein activity and stability in the Discussion part.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. Authors have described the clinical and molecular spectrum of Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome. I have few comments-

Introduction-

Second para- 4th line- Authors could add more Indian references on MVK disorder. Some of the important references are as follows-

1: Correa ARE, Gupta N, Bagri N, Vignesh P, Alam S, Yamaguchi S. Mevalonate

Kinase Deficiency as Cause of Periodic Fever in Two Siblings. Indian Pediatr.

2020 Feb 15;57(2):180-181. PubMed PMID: 32060250

2: Jain A, Misra DP, Sharma A, Wakhlu A, Agarwal V, Negi VS. Vasculitis and

vasculitis-like manifestations in monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes. Rheumatol

Int. 2018 Jan;38(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3839-6. Epub 2017 Oct 14.

Review. PubMed PMID: 29032440.

3: Abdulla MC, Hawkins PN, Alungal J, Rowczenio D. Hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome

in an Indian family undiagnosed for 11 years. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017

Dec;20(12):2236-2237. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12811. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PubMed PMID:

26620804.

4: Sinha A, Waterham HR, Sreedhar KV, Jain V. Novel mutations causing

hyperimmunoglobulin D and periodic fever syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2012

Jul;49(7):583-5. PubMed PMID: 22885443.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion, we have added papers from India in the manuscript.

Methods-

Clinical work up- Whether any biochemical assays like GCMS was performed? In how many clinical diagnoses of Hyper IgD was made in the absence of IgD levels.

Response: Unfortunately, GCMS was not done in any of the patients and IgD estimation was not possible in 70% of the children, although IgA levels were elevated in 100% of children. Total IgD was estimated in 2 patients and IgD surface in 1 patient which has been put in the Supplementary Table 1.

Variant prioritization- Generally a MAF of 1% is used. The reason behind using MAF of 5% may be specified.

Response: We appreciate the reviewer for pointing this out. We totally agree that in various studies, MAF was taken as 1% for variant filtering. But in a recent study by ClinGen experts showed that higher frequency (MAF>0.05) variants in one or more control populations could be pathogenic or likely pathogenic (PMID:31942019 PMID:30311383). So not to miss any variant that could be a pathogenic we kept the MAF>0.05 for variant filtering.

Table 1- Elevated IgD is seen in patient 1 only.was it performed in one patient? or was it normal in others. I understand that it is not widely available.

Response: As mentioned by the reviewer, total IgD estimation is not widely available in our country. Hence it could only be done only for two patients and Surface IgD could be done only for one patient.

Information on consanguinity should be added in the table.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion, We have added it to Supplementary Table 1 where only 1 family is consanguineous with homozygous mutation.

Highlight the significance of elevated Vit B12

Response: Unfortunately, we could not find any literature regarding elevated B12 levels in HIDS patients. However, in ALPS which is a well known primary immune deficiency disorder with elevated B12 levels, the reason attributed is an increase in the binding protein haptocorrin (PMID:22306884). Further studies will be necessary to ascertain this finding.

Discussion-

Did authors find any genotype phenotype correlation.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion, we have added the genotype-phenotype correlations in the discussion.

Authors have stated that p.V377I and c.226+2delT are the common mutations in Indian subcontinent. This should be stated after incorporating the complete Indian data.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We agreed that there should be complete Indian data to state the variant as a common mutation in Indian subcontinent. We have changed it to South India since all our patents belong to South India. All the variants which we found from the literature also had South Indian Ancestry.

Was there any analysis done to prove the founder effect?

Response: We are really thankful to the reviewer for that. We have put the GSA data and performed the identity by descent analysis of our two patients which had same recurrent compound heterozygous mutation to prove mutation to be a founder mutation.

I think this line at the end of discussion ("In a patient who manifest ......... for V377I and c.226+2delT in MVK)may not be generalisable as Indian population is very heterogenous and this study mainly included the south Indian population .

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion, we agreed that the mutation could not be generalized to Indian population. So, we have made the changes of the mutation from Indian population to South Indian population.

General comments-

Minor typos in introduction and discussion

Response: We have revised the manuscript and corrected typos.

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Dror Sharon

31 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-12540R1

Spectrum of clinical features and genetic variants in mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene of South Indian families suffering from Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Scaria,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please see the minor comments raised by Reviewer #1.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript within 4 weeks. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dror Sharon, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Much improved. Figure 1 is very helpful. Suppliment table 3 probably should be in the manuscript rather than a supplement. P20 paragraph 4 line 4 except not "expect". Supplement 2 column 1 no $ sign

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237999.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


4 Aug 2020

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

________________________________________

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

________________________________________

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Much improved. Figure 1 is very helpful. Suppliment table 3 probably should be in the manuscript rather than a supplement. P20 paragraph 4 line 4 except not "expect". Supplement 2 column 1 no $ sign

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have added supplementary table 3 to the manuscript as Table 2 and remove it from the supplementary. We apologize for this mistake, we have corrected the word expect to except. We have removed the text in column 1 of supplementary 2.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

________________________________________

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Dror Sharon

7 Aug 2020

Spectrum of clinical features and genetic variants in mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene of South Indian families suffering from Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome

PONE-D-20-12540R2

Dear Dr. Scaria,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dror Sharon, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Dror Sharon

11 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-12540R2

Spectrum of clinical features and genetic variants in mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene of South Indian families suffering from Hyperimmunoglobulin D Syndrome

Dear Dr. Scaria:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Dror Sharon

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Pedigrees and chromatograms for the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants typed in the family using Sanger capillary sequencing.

    Samples marked $-were analysed using whole exome sequencing and marked # were analysed using Sanger capillary sequencing.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Clinical features of patients with HIDS in the present cohort.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Data summary of exome sequencing for five patients with HIDS.

    (XLSX)

    S1 File. Primer sequence for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing with coordinates (GRCh37 or hg19).

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data involved in the study will be provided upon request, as it could be potentially identifiable and contains patient sensitive information. Access to the data could be requested by mailing to Dr. Jyoti Yadav (j.yadav@igib.res.in) who is the convener of the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of CSIR-IGIB.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES