Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2020 Jul 6;177(18):4147–4165. doi: 10.1111/bph.15158

Artesunate interacts with the vitamin D receptor to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in a mouse model via enhancing autophagy

Shenglan Shang 1,2, Jiaqi Wu 1, Xiaoli Li 1, Xin Liu 1, Pan Li 1,3, Chunli Zheng 4, Yonghua Wang 4, Songqing Liu 2,, Jiang Zheng 1,, Hong Zhou 1,3,5,
PMCID: PMC7443466  PMID: 32520399

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Immunosuppression is the predominant cause of mortality for sepsis because of failure to eradicate pathogens. No effective and specific drugs capable of reversing immunosuppression are clinically available. Evidences implicate the involvement of the vitamin D receptor (NR1I1) in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression. The anti‐malarial artesunate was investigated to determine action on sepsis‐induced immunosuppression.

Experimental Approach

The effect of artesunate on sepsis‐induced immunosuppression was investigated in mice and human and mice cell lines. Bioinformatics predicted vitamin D receptor as a candidate target for artesunate, which was then identified using PCR and immunoblotting. Vdr, Atg16l1 and NF‐κB p65 were modified to investigate artesunate 's effect on pro‐inflammatory cytokines release, bacterial clearance and autophagy activities in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression.

Key Results

Artesunate significantly reduced the mortality of caecal ligation and puncture (CLP)‐induced sepsis immunosuppression mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enhanced pro‐inflammatory cytokine release and bacterial clearance to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, artesunate interacted with vitamin D receptor, inhibiting its nuclear translocation, which influenced ATG16L1 transcription and subsequent autophagy activity. Artesunate inhibited the physical interaction between vitamin D receptor and NF‐κB p65 in LPS‐tolerant macrophages and then promoted the nuclear translocation of NF‐κB p65, which activated the transcription of NF‐κB p65 target genes such as pro‐inflammatory cytokines.

Conclusion and Implications

Our findings provide evidence that artesunate interacted with vitamin D receptor to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in an autophagy and NF‐κB‐dependent manner, highlighting a novel approach for sepsis treatment and drug repurposing of artesunate has a bidirectional immunomodulator.


graphic file with name BPH-177-4147-g009.jpg


Abbreviations

anti‐PD‐1

anti‐programmed cell death receptor‐1

AS

artesunate

ATG16L1

autophagy related 16 like 1

Baf

bafilomycin A1

ChIP

chromatin immunoprecipitation

CLP mice

caecal ligation and puncture (CLP)‐induced sepsis immunosuppression mice

CLP

caecal ligation and puncture

co‐IP

coimmunoprecipitation

LC3B

protein 1 light chain 3

PA

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

PMs

peritoneal macrophages

RAW264.7

macrophage‐like RAW cells

RXR

retinoid X receptor

TCMSP

traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

TLR4

toll‐like receptor 4

VDR

vitamin D receptor

VD3

1α,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol)

3‐MA

3‐methyladenine

What is already known

  • Immunosuppression is the predominant cause of mortality during the later phase of sepsis.

  • Vitamin D receptor (VDR; NR1I1) activation is closely related to the pathophysiological duration of sepsis.

What does this study add

  • Artesunate reverses sepsis‐induced immunosuppression resulting from caecal ligation and puncture in mice.

  • Artesunate interacts with VDR to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in an autophagy and NF‐κB‐dependent manner.

What is the clinical significance

  • Autophagy inhibited by VDR receptor overexpression might be a drug target for reversing sepsis‐induced immunosuppression.

  • Artesunate is a bidirectional immunomodulator to treat sepsis caused by pathogens and deserves further investigation.

1. INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a leading cause of death worldwide (Angus & van der Poll, 2013); it arises when hosts response to pathogen infections such as bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic infection and then injury their own tissues and organs (Hotchkiss, Monneret, & Payen, 2013b). At present, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a newly recognized virus, has spread rapidly around the world and has infected closed to more than 6,600,000 people and killed more than 380,000 until June 4, 2020, because of no specific and effective drug.

The course of sepsis involves the innate and acquired immune systems, in which mononuclear phagocytes play a crucial role. Although the timeline of immunological alterations in sepsis is not well understood, increasing evidences suggest that sepsis development involves two distinct stages, an initial cytokine storm (hyper‐inflammation) and subsequent immunosuppression (hypo‐inflammation), which exist concomitantly and dominate in different stages (Hotchkiss, Monneret, & Payen, 2013a; Hutchins, Unsinger, Hotchkiss, & Ayala, 2014). The uncontrolled cytokine storm is responsible for deaths that occur within the first few days, whereas immunosuppression predominantly causes mortality during the later stages. In fact, more than 70% of patients die after the first 3 days of sepsis, possibly because of increased susceptibility to weakly virulent pathogens or opportunistic bacteria (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa [PA]), indicating the host's failure to eradicate invading pathogens (Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Skrupky, Kerby, & Hotchkiss, 2011). For patients in the immunosuppression stage, less than 5% of monocytes/macrophages produce cytokines, indicative of the disordered immune response in sepsis (Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Hutchins et al., 2014). This impaired function of monocytes/macrophages is closely associated with the decreased removal of bacteria. Drugs based on the inhibiting critical pro‐inflammatory mediators have failed; therefore, current sepsis research is focusing on therapeutic strategies to improve immunosuppression (Cohen, 2002; Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Kox, Volk, Kox, & Volk, 2000; Prucha, Zazula, & Russwurm, 2017).

Autophagy is a fundamental cellular process involved in the defence against intracellular pathogen infection (Casanova, 2017). Although contradictory findings have been reported (Ho et al., 2016), accumulating evidence suggests that autophagy plays a key role in sepsis and might be a target for sepsis‐induced immunosuppression (Ren, Zhang, Wu, & Yao, 2017). Thus, focusing on the autophagy axis might reveal the mechanism of sepsis‐induced immunosuppression and lead to novel immunoregulatory therapy for sepsis.

Artesunate (AS) is an effective and reliable anti‐malarial drug with low toxicity (Burrows, Chibale, & Wells, 2011; Clark et al., 2004) that possesses anti‐inflammation and other effects (Efferth, Dunstan, Sauerbrey, Miyachi, & Chitambar, 2001; Li et al., 2008; Miranda et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2017). Previously, we showed that artesunate protects septic animals by inhibiting pro‐inflammatory cytokine release in the cytokine storm stage (Li et al., 2008), suggesting an anti‐inflammatory effect during the cytokine storm phase. In the present study, a caecal ligation and puncture (CLP)‐induced sepsis immunosuppression mouse model was used to investigate the effect of artesunate on sepsis‐induced immunosuppression. An LPS/endotoxin‐tolerant cell model was established to reveal the underlying mechanism.

2. METHODS

2.1. Animals

All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the Third Military Medical University (AMUWEC2020015). Animal studies are reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Kilkenny et al., 2010) and with the recommendations made by the British Journal of Pharmacology. BALB/c mice (RRID:IMSR_ORNL:BALB/cRl; sex: half male and half female; weight: 18–22 g; age: 6–8 weeks) were obtained from Beijing HFK Bioscience (Beijing, China) and housed in a pathogen‐free facility with a 12‐h artificial light–dark cycle in the Third Military Medical University. All the mice were provided with food and purified water ad libitum. There were no more than five mice in each cage.

2.2. Cell lines, culture and isolation of peritoneal macrophages from mice

The murine macrophage‐like cell line RAW264.7 (CLS Cat#400319/p462_RAW‐2647, RRID:CVCL_0493) cells and human monocyte THP‐1 (CLS Cat# 300356/p804_THP‐1, RRID:CVCL_0006) cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). RAW264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% low‐LPS FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (regular medium) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. THP‐1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Hyclone) regular medium in suspension. THP‐1 derived macrophages were obtained by differentiating THP‐1 cells with phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (PMA) (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) treatment at 100 nM for 24 h according to the previous study (Li et al., 2017).

Mouse peritoneal macrophages (PMs) were obtained from BALB/c mice. Each mouse was injected intraperitoneally with 3 ml of 3% thioglycolate (Sigma‐Aldrich) on day 1 and killed using isoflurane on day 3. After intraperitoneal injection of 5 ml of DMEM regular medium, the peritoneal cells were collected into cell culture dishes. Two hours later, the floating cells were removed by washing the cells with PBS. The attached cells were considered to be peritoneal macrophages (purity was about 90%) and were subjected to further experiments. The primary mouse macrophages or cell lines were maintained in regular medium at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. All the reagents and utensils used in the experiment were LPS‐free.

2.3. Bacterial strain and preparation of bacterial suspension

The clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was kindly provided by Prof. Peiyuan Xia (Southwestern Hospital, Chongqing, China). A single colony was picked from viable, growing cells on a Mueller‐Hinton (MH) agar plate, transferred to 5 ml of liquid MH medium and cultivated aerobically at 37°C in an orbital shaking incubator for 4 h. The cultures were transferred to 100 ml of fresh MH medium for another 12 h. At an OD600 of 0.6–0.8, when the bacterial culture was within the logarithmic phase of growth, as measured using a SmartSpec 3000 spectrophotometer (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the suspension was centrifuged at 1,500×g for 10 min to harvest the pellet. After washing twice, the pellet was resuspended in sterile normal saline. The bacteria were diluted in sterile normal saline to achieve the final concentration (colony‐forming unit [CFU]·ml−1), which was calculated according to the bacterial growth curve determined in our laboratory (Concentration = (9.7544 × OD − 1.4965) × 108 CFU·ml−1).

2.4. Establishment of caecal ligation and puncture (CLP)‐induced sepsis immunosuppression mouse model and artesunate treatment

Currently, CLP in rodents is regarded as a gold standard in sepsis research (Rittirsch, Huber‐Lang, Flierl, & Ward, 2009). CLP immunosuppression mice (CLP mice) with a second bacterial infection model were established in our laboratory and were described previously (Deng et al., 2017). Briefly, CLP mice were established by ligating the distal 1.0 cm of the caecum and puncturing once with a No. 16 steel needle and then intravenously injecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (with 2.5 × 109 CFU·kg−1) at 24 h after CLP surgery (Figure 1a).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Artesunate (AS) reverses sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mice. (a) Schematic diagram of the establishment of the CLP mouse model with secondary bacterial infection. (b) Mortality of CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and treated by AS (10 mg·kg−1) (n = 20). (c) Effect of AS treatment on the level of TNF‐α (c1), IL‐6 (c2) and IL‐1β (c3) in the serum, spleen and lungs of CLP mice (n = 8). (d) Effect of AS treatment on the level of TNF‐α (d1), IL‐6 (d2), and IL‐1β (d3) in the serum, spleen and lungs of CLP mice challenged with PA (n = 8). (e) Effect of AS treatment on the bacterial load in the blood (e1), spleen (e2) and lungs (e3) at 4 h after the CLP mice were challenged with PA (n = 8). Kaplan–Meyer log‐rank test (b); one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (c–e); * P < 0.05

Artesunate (injection preparation, Guilin Pharma Corp, Guangxi, People's Republic of China National Medicine Standard H10930195) was added into the attached injection containing 5% sodium bicarbonate, shaken for 2 min until completely dissolved and then diluted in sterile normal saline to achieve the final concentration. Artesunate (10 mg·kg−1) was intramuscularly injected at 22, 26, 48 and 72 h following CLP surgery. The survival rate of the mice was observed for 7 days. CLP mice were killed at 4 h after Pseudomonas aeruginosa injection. The blood, lungs and spleen tissues were collected for CFU count assays and elisa.

2.5. Establishment of LPS‐tolerance cell model

LPS tolerance is used extensively to simulate the sepsis‐induced immunosuppression phase in vitro (Li et al., 2013). Herein, a cell model of LPS tolerance was established in mouse peritoneal macrophages and RAW264.7 cells and human THP‐1 cells. Briefly, cells were cultured with LPS (0111: B4, 5 ng·ml−1, Sigma‐Aldrich) for 4 h. Then the culture supernatant was replaced followed by the addition of LPS (100 ng·ml−1) to establish the LPS‐tolerant cell model.

2.6. Artesunate, autophagy inhibitors and 1α,25(OH)2D3 treatment in vitro

For artesunate treatment, artesunate (5, 10 and 20 μg·ml−1) was added with LPS (5 ng·ml−1) and LPS (100 ng·ml−1) simultaneously. For autophagy inhibitors treatment, 3‐methyladenine (3‐MA, 5 mM, Sigma‐Aldrich), bafilomycin A1 (Baf, 10 ng·ml−1, MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA), and LY294002 (10 μM, Sigma‐Aldrich) were added 2 h before the first LPS (5 ng·ml−1) and also simultaneously with artesunate treatment. The treatment of 1α,25(OH)2D3 (VD3) (100 nM, Solarbio, Beijing, China) was the same as the autophagy inhibitors. The supernatants and cells were collected at 6 h after the last LPS (100 ng·ml−1) addition.

2.7. siRNA, lentivirus and their transfections in vitro

Control siRNA‐A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), Vdr siRNA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Atg16l1 esiRNA (endoribonuclease‐prepared siRNA; Sigma‐Aldrich) were used. RAW264.7 cells were transfected with 50 nM of target siRNA or control siRNA using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Opti‐MEM I reduced serum medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 6 h. After recovering overnight, the cells were subjected to further treatment.

The DNA fragments encoding mouse Vdr (NM_009504) or NF‐κB p65 (NM_009045) were synthesized and inserted into the lentivirus vector (#GV358, GeneChem) by GeneChem Corporation (Shanghai, China). The resulting recombinant lentivirus was named Vdr‐OE or p65‐OE. The negative control (#CON238, GeneChem) was named NC‐OE. The shRNA targeting mouse Vdr (5′‐CCTCAAACTCTGATCTGTA‐3′), NF‐κB p65 (5′‐CCCTCAGCACCATCAACTTTG‐3′) and the negative control shRNA (5′‐TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT‐3′) were designed, synthesized and inserted into the lentivirus vector (#GV248, GeneChem) by GeneChem Corporation. The resulting recombinant lentiviruses were named Vdr‐KD, p65‐KD and NC‐KD.

For lentivirus transfection, RAW264.7 cells were cultured to 50% confluence and transfected with the lentivirus according to the protocol in the Lentivirus Operation Manual for 6 h. After 3 days of renewed culture in regular DMEM, the cells were subjected to further treatment.

2.8. shRNA transfection in vivo

The lentiviruses Vdr‐KD and NC‐KD were diluted to a total volume of 200 μl containing 4 × 107 TU. BALB/c mice were transfected through tail intravenous injection as reported previously (Morizono et al., 2005). One week later, the mice were killed and spleen tissues were collected to detect the infection efficiency. Further CLP modelling and artesunate treatment were employed in the transfected mice and their tissues were collected for cytokines and western blotting assays.

2.9. Interacting molecular prediction for artesunate

Interacting molecular prediction for artesunate was performed against 5,311 proteins using the weighted ensemble similarity algorithm (Zheng et al., 2015) assembled in the traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform (TCMSP) (Ru et al., 2014). Weighted ensemble similarity was developed to determine a drug's affiliation for a target by evaluation of the overall similarity (ensemble) rather than a single ligand judgement, which allowed us to discover scaffold hopping ligands. The ligand structural and physicochemical features of artesunate were calculated using Chemical Development Kit (CDK) (Steinbeck et al., 2003) and Dragon software and then used to evaluate the ensemble similarity between artesunate and the ligands of candidate targets. Finally, the standardized ensemble similarities of Chemical Development Kit and Dragon were integrated using a Bayesian network to rank the predicted targets.

2.10. Transmission electron microscopy

RAW264.7 cells were treated as indicated above and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight and then post fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide for 1.5 h at room temperature. After fixation, the cells were embedded in resin, sectioned and stained with uranyl acetate/lead citrate. The sections were examined under a transmission electron microscope (JEM‐1400PLUS, Japan) at 60 kV.

2.11. Immunofluorescence assay

The immuno‐related procedures used comply with the recommendations made by the British Journal of Pharmacology (Alexander et al., 2018). RAW264.7 cells or peritoneal macrophages plated on the coverslips for 2 h and treated as indicated in Section 2.5. The coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X‐100 (Solarbio) which dissolved in PBS for 5 min (20 min for nucleoprotein staining). Then the coverslips were blocked for 1 h at 37°C in PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.1% Triton X‐100 and incubated with primary antibodies (Table S1) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies. The cells on coverslips were counterstained with 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐1H‐indole‐6‐carboxamidine (DAPI) (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Confocal images were captured using a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope (Jena, Germany) with a Plan‐Apo Chromat 63×/1.40 oil objective.

2.12. MTT assay

RAW264.7 cells (5 × 104 cells per well) were plated in 96‐well plates in regular medium. After overnight culture, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with a series concentration of LPS or other treatments for 4 or 24 h. Subsequently, 20 μl of the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) solution (5 mg·ml−1) was added to the medium in a total volume of 200 μl. The cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The supernatant was removed and 150 μl of DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the produced formazan crystals. The extinction was measured at 490 nm using a SmartSpec 3000 spectrophotometer (Bio‐Rad).

2.13. Bacterial load assay

For the mouse tissue samples, at the indicated time points after Pseudomonas aeruginosa injection, the blood, lungs and spleen were collected. Blood or homogenates of cells, lungs and spleen tissues were serially diluted. Subsequently, 100 μl of the diluents was added to nutrient agar plates and cultured for 18 h. Images of the agar plates and CFU counts were obtained using a G6 automated colony counter (Shineso Science & Technology, Hangzhou, China).

For cell samples, 2 h after challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the cells were collected and washed with PBS three times. The cells were disrupted by 2 min of ultrasonication (ultrasonic time 5 s/gap time 10 s cycling, power 100 W) in an ice bath and then centrifuged under 4°C at 800×g for 5 min. The precipitate was resuspended in MH medium and serially diluted.

2.14. Binding assay

Microlon elisa Plates were coated with antibody against vitamin D receptor (VDR) (anti‐VDR antibody) (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 12550, RRID:AB_2637002) overnight at 4°C, followed by three washes with PBS. The cell lysate containing the total proteins, including the VDR protein, was added to the plates. After incubating at 37°C for 2 h, the VDR protein was captured by the anti‐VDR antibody coated on the plates. Subsequently, the plates were washed three times and VD3 (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA) was added. After incubating at 37°C for 2 h, the plates were washed three times, and fluorophore‐conjugated artesunate (designed and synthesized by Chongqing Canbipharma Technology, Chongqing, China) was added. After incubating at 37°C for 2 h, the plates were washed three times and the fluorescence intensity was observed using a Spectra Max i3x Multifunctional enzyme marker (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength of 455 nm. Artesunate conjugated with fluorophore 12‐(7‐oxycoumarinyl‐ethoxy) dihydroartemisinin was named artesunate I and artesunate conjugated with 12‐(‐1H‐benzo [de] isoquinoline‐1, 3(2H)‐dione‐2‐ethoxy) dihydroartemisinin was named artesunate II.

2.15. Cytokines and NF‐κB p65 assays

The supernatants were collected from cell cultures. Serum was separated from collected blood samples. For mouse tissue samples, 1 g of lungs and spleen tissue was homogenized and centrifuged and the supernatants were collected. The levels of cytokines such as TNF‐α, IL‐6 and IL‐1β in all samples were determined using the appropriate elisa kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturers' protocols. For NF‐κB p65 levels in the nucleus and nucleoproteins were extracted and detected using a Trans‐AM NF‐κB kit (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.16. Quantitative real‐time PCR

Total RNAs were extracted from cells and tissues using the MagMAX total RNA isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transcribed into cDNAs using Prime Script (Takara, Dalian, China). Using respective primers (Table S2), quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) was performed using a 7900HT Fast Real‐Time PCR system or ABI 7500 Real‐Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). Expression levels were normalized to the expression of β‐actin mRNA. Reactions were performed in duplicate using Tli RNaseH plus and universal PCR master mix (Takara). The relative expression was calculated by the 2(ΔΔCt) method (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001).

2.17. Western blotting

Cell proteins and mice spleens were extracted using RIPA (Beyotime). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were isolated using nucleoprotein extraction kits (Keygen Biotech, Beijing, China). The proteins were then quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Beyotime). Thirty micrograms of each protein sample were separated by 12% SDS‐PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA and incubated with primary antibodies (Table S1) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were rinsed five times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated for 1 h with the appropriate HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody at 37°C. Membranes were extensively washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 three times. Chemiluminescence‐marked images were developed using the Enhanced Chemiluminescent Substrate (PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) with a ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System (Bio‐Rad) and analysed using the Image Lab package (Bio‐Rad).

2.18. ChIP assays

RAW264.7 cells were washed with cold PBS and crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde. The reaction was stopped using 0.125 M of glycine. The cells were then sonicated in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) lysis buffer to generate 600 bp of fragments, followed by overnight incubation with anti‐VDR antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C. The obtained DNA was subjected to semiquantitative or quantitative PCR analysis. Specific primers (Table S3) were used to amplify the VDR‐binding region from the promoter of the ATG16L1 gene, according to a previously described method (Wu et al., 2015). The ChIP assay was performed using the Pierce Agarose ChIP kit and following the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) (Bretin et al., 2016).

2.19. Coimmunoprecipitation assay

Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins from RAW264.7 cells were isolated using nucleoprotein extraction kits (Keygen Biotech, Jiangsu, China). Protein (1 mg) was incubated with anti‐VDR antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) at 4°C overnight. Immune complexes were collected using the Protein A/G beads and subjected to SDS‐PAGE and western blotting as described in Section 2.17. Coimmunoprecipitation (co‐IP) was performed according to the manual of the Protein A/G Magnetic Beads kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.20. Statistical analysis

The data and statistical analysis comply with the recommendations of the British Journal of Pharmacology on experimental design and analysis in pharmacology (Curtis et al., 2018), with the exception that the analysis was not blinded. Each experiment involved at least five independent samples (equal size) per randomized group and that statistical analysis was done using these independent values. The statistical analysis was undertaken only for studies where each group size was at least n = 5.

Sample sizes were based upon our prior experience using the same paradigms (Deng et al., 2017; Kuang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2010). No outliers were excluded in the data analysis and presentation. The control and test values in PCR were normalized to an internal standard (such as Actb and GAPDH) to reduce variance. For binding assay and immunofluorescence assay, all values (control and test) were normalized to the mean value of the experimental control group to set the Y‐axis, so the control group value was 1. The units for these normalized data in the Y‐axis were the fold of the control group's mean value. The units for the other data were the exact unit of the assay but not fold control. The statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (263) (RRID:SCR_002798; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The Kaplan–Meyer log‐rank test was used for the survival analysis of the mouse model of sepsis. All data were expressed as the mean ± SD. A Student's t test was used when comparing two values (two tailed, two‐sample equal variance). The comparisons among multiple groups were performed with a one‐way ANOVA. If appropriate (only if F in ANOVA achieved the “chosen” necessary level of statistical significance and there was no significant variance inhomogeneity), this was followed by Tukey's post hoc test. For each parameter of the data presented, * indicates P < 0.05.

2.21. Nomenclature of targets and ligands

Key protein targets and ligands in this article are hyperlinked to corresponding entries in http://www.guidetopharmacology.org, the common portal for data from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY (Harding et al., 2018) and are permanently archived in the Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 (Alexander et al., 2019).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Artesunate reverses sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mice

Treatment with artesunate decreased the mortality of CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 85% to 50% (Figure 1b), suggesting that artesunate could protect against CLP‐induced immunosuppression in mice. In CLP mice without Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge, the levels of TNF‐α, IL‐1β and IL‐6 were extremely low in the serum, spleen and lungs. However, their levels increased significantly in artesunate‐treated CLP mice (Figure 1c). Furthermore, the cytokine levels in CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa were also much lower compared with those in sham mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, demonstrating that bacterial challenge did not induce pro‐inflammatory cytokine release in sepsis‐induced immunosuppressed mice. Noteworthily, artesunate treatment significantly augmented the cytokine levels in CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Figure 1d). The bacterial loads increased markedly in the tissues of CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared with those in the sham mice, demonstrating that the CLP mice had a lower bacterial clearance ability. However, artesunate significantly decreased the bacterial load in CLP mice challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Figure 1e). The aforementioned results suggested that artesunate could protect against sepsis‐induced immunosuppression by increasing pro‐inflammatory cytokine release and decreasing the bacterial load.

3.2. Artesunate increases pro‐inflammatory cytokines release and bacterial clearance in LPS‐tolerant macrophages

Based on the concentration–effect relationship between LPS and cytokine production (Figure 2a), incubation in 5 ng·ml−1 of LPS for 4 h followed by 100 ng·ml−1 of LPS was determined to induce an LPS‐tolerant phenotype (tolerant cells) (Figure 2b). Compared with cells treated with only 100 ng·ml−1 of LPS (LPS cells), tolerant cells pretreated with 5 ng·ml−1 of LPS followed by 100 ng·ml−1 of LPS released much less TNF‐α and IL‐6 (Figure 2c). However, artesunate dose‐dependently increased TNF‐α and IL‐6 release in tolerant cells (Figure 2d). The results showed that the bacterial loads in LPS‐tolerant cells increased relative to LPS cells at 2 h after Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge. Significantly, artesunate decreased the bacteria load in tolerant cells (Figure 2e). Subsequently, the human monocyte cell line THP‐1 and THP‐1 derived macrophages were employed to confirm that artesunate had a similar effect on human macrophages. Identical results for the mRNA levels of TNF‐α and IL‐6 and bacterial clearance were obtained in THP‐1 cells and THP‐1 derived macrophages, too (Figure 2f,g). The concentrations of LPS (2.5–200 ng·ml−1) and artesunate (0.625–40 μg·ml−1) used in the experiment did not affect cell viability, therefore the above effect was not related to LPS or artesunate toxicity (Figure S1) (Li et al., 2008). These results were consistent with the findings in vivo, demonstrating that artesunate reversed sepsis‐induced immunosuppression by enhancing pro‐inflammatory cytokines release and bacterial clearance by macrophages.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Artesunate (AS) increases pro‐inflammatory cytokines release and bacterial clearance within LPS‐tolerant macrophages (n = 4). (a) LPS increased the release of TNF‐α (a1) and IL‐6 (a2) from peritoneal macrophages (PMs) in a dose‐dependent manner. (b) Schematic diagram of the establishment of the LPS‐tolerant macrophage model. (c) The level of TNF‐α (c1) and IL‐6 (c2) in LPS‐tolerant PMs (n = 5). (d) Effect of AS (5, 10 and 20 μg·ml−1) treatment on the level of TNF‐α (d1, d2) and IL‐6 (d3, d4) in LPS‐tolerant PMs and RAW264.7 cells (n = 5). (e) Effect of AS treatment (20 μg·ml−1) on the bacterial load in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells (n = 8). (f) Effect of AS (20 μg·ml−1) treatment on the mRNA level of TNF‐α (f1, f2) and IL‐6 (f3, f4) in LPS‐tolerant THP‐1 monocytes and THP‐1 derived macrophages (n = 5). (g) Effect of AS treatment (20 μg·ml−1) on the bacterial load in LPS‐tolerant THP‐1 derived macrophages (n = 8). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; * P < 0.05

3.3. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is predicted to be an interaction candidate of artesunate

To further investigate the molecular mechanism of artesunate, the possibly interacting candidates were predicted. First, the top 20 candidates (Figure 3a) were screened using RT‐PCR and western blotting. Among them, the most significant and stable change was observed in the mRNA and protein levels of VDR, which remarkably increased in tolerant cells and were decreased by artesunate treatment (Figure 3b,c).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The vitamin D receptor is predicted to be an interactor candidate of artesunate (AS). (a) A total of 20 underlying signal molecules were selected via the traditional Chinese medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform (TCMSP). (b) Effect of AS on the relative mRNA levels of Vdr (n = 5). (c) Effect of AS on the protein levels of VDR (n = 5). (d) Effect of Vdr siRNA (d1) and Vdr‐KD lentiviral vector (d2) on TNF‐α levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). (e) Effect of Vdr‐OE lentiviral vector on TNF‐α level in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). (f1) Schematic diagram of the binding assay designed in our laboratory. (f2) Effect of VD3 on the binding of AS and VDR tracked by AS fluorophores (n = 5). AS with fluorophore 12‐(7‐oxycoumarinyl‐ethoxy) dihydroartemisinin was named AS I and AS with 12‐(‐1H‐benzo [de] isoquinoline‐1, 3(2H)‐dione‐2‐ethoxy) dihydroartemisinin was named AS II. (g) Effect of VD3 (100 nM) on TNF‐α levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; ns, not significant; * P < 0.05

Second, Vdr expression in RAW264.7 was modified. A Vdr siRNA and a lentiviral vector harbouring an RNAi sequence against Vdr were transfected into RAW264.7 cells to knock down Vdr expression (Vdr‐KD cells) (Figure S2a). Knockdown of Vdr abrogated the LPS‐tolerant phenotype,and artesunate addition had no effect (Figure 3d). A lentiviral vector harbouring the Vdr gene was transfected into RAW264.7 cells to overexpress Vdr (Vdr‐OE cells) (Figure S2b). The results showed that the artesunate‐induced TNF‐α increase in LPS‐tolerant cells was abrogated by overexpressing Vdr (Figure 3e). These findings suggested VDR as an essential and key molecule in LPS‐tolerant formation and could be further considered as a candidate interactor for artesunate.

Third, to verify the interaction between artesunate and VDR, an indirect competitive binding assay using fluorophore‐labelled artesunate was carried out (Figure 3f1). Pre‐incubation with VD3 decreased the artesunate‐related fluorescence intensity significantly (Figure 3f2), suggesting that VD3 occupied the receptor to decrease the interaction between artesunate and VDR.

Last, VD3 is a natural agonist that showed high affinity for VDR (Haussler, Jurutka, Mizwicki, & Norman, 2011),therefore the effect of artesunate on TNF‐α level was determined in presence and in absence of VD3. In the absence of VD3, the TNF‐α level decreased and artesunate increased TNF‐α release from LPS‐tolerant cells. However, after pre‐incubation with VD3, artesunate‐induced TNF‐α increase was eliminated (Figure 3g), indicating antagonism between VD3 and artesunate. These results strongly indicated that artesunate binds to the same receptor and even similar sites, as VD3.

These findings demonstrated that artesunate interacts with VDR and inhibits its biological function. Therefore, we considered that artesunate might interact with VDR as an antagonist to reverse the LPS‐tolerant state.

3.4. Artesunate inhibits the nuclear translocation of VDR and modulates the transcription of its target gene, Atg16l1

VDR is a nuclear receptor that mediates most of the biological functions of VD3 and translocate into the nucleus to regulate the transcription of downstream target genes, such as Atg16l1 by binding to their promotors (Baeke, Gysemans, Korf, & Mathieu, 2010), thus regulating VD3‐mediated regulation of autophagy and antibacterial effects (Sun, 2016). Therefore, we investigated the nuclear translocation of VDR and its subsequent effect on autophagy related 16 like 1 (ATG16L1) first. Immunoblotting and immunostaining showed that the VDR protein level increased dramatically in the nucleus of LPS‐tolerant cells compared with LPS cells, which could be reversed by artesunate (Figure 4a,b). Second, ChIP assay results showed that artesunate induced binding of VDR to the Atg16l1 promoter, as analysed using semiquantitative PCR and RT‐PCR in LPS‐tolerant cells (Figure 4c,d). Together, these data showed that artesunate's effect is associated with transcriptional regulation by VDR on Atg16l1. Third, immunoblotting indicated that the level of ATG16L1 in LPS‐tolerant cells decreased markedly compared with that in LPS cells, but artesunate increased its level (Figure 4e), which did not change in presence of VD3 (Figure S3a,b). The results suggested that VDR regulates Atg16l1 transcription negatively in LPS‐tolerant cells, which could be prevented by artesunate. Additionally, the level of ATG16L1 in LPS‐tolerant cells markedly increased in the Vdr‐KD group compared with that in NC‐KD group and the effect of artesunate was diminished (Figure 4f). However, the artesunate‐induced increase in ATG16L1 levels in LPS‐tolerant cells was abrogated by overexpression of Vdr (Figure 4g). These findings indicated that artesunate inhibits the function of VDR via preventing the nuclear translocation of VDR, thus influencing the transcription of its target gene Atg16l1.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Artesunate (AS) inhibits the nuclear translocation of VDR and modulates the transcription of its target gene Atg16l1. RAW264.7 cells were treated as described in the legend of Figure 2d. (a) Immunoblotting to observe the VDR level in the nuclear lysate. (b) Immunostaining to observe the nuclear translocation of VDR. VDR was probed using Alexa Fluor 555 (red). Representative images (bar = 5 μm) (b1). The karyoplasmic ratio of VDR was quantified from 100 cells (normalized to medium) (b2). (c) ChIP analysis for the binding of VDR to the Atg16l1 promoter. The protein–DNA complex was immunoprecipitated with anti‐VDR antibody or a negative control IgG. Representative agarose gels for the VDR‐binding region in the Atg16l1 promoter and Actb DNA in the input amplified using semiquantitative PCR. (d) The binding of VDR to the Atg16l1 promoter, normalized to Actb DNA in the input, analysed by qPCR (n = 5). (e) The protein level of ATG16L1 in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS. (f) Change in ATG16L1 protein levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells (Vdr‐KD) treated with AS. (g) Change in ATG16L1 protein levels in Vdr‐OE LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; * P < 0.05

3.5. Artesunate's autophagy‐dependent effects act through VDR in vitro

Autophagy is an important self‐protection mechanism required for bacterial clearance and inflammation (Gutierrez et al., 2004; Levine, Mizushima, & Virgin, 2011). Atg16l1, the target gene of VDR and an autophagy regulator, links VDR and autophagy (Wu & Sun, 2011). First, to confirm the function of ATG16L1, cells were treated with Atg16l1 siRNA (Figure S4a). TNF‐α and IL‐6 levels in LPS cells decreased and artesunate‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐6 increase in LPS‐tolerant cells were eliminated in the Atg16l1 siRNA‐infected group compared with those in the negative control group (Figures 5a and S4a). This suggested that ATG16L1 is associated with inflammatory cytokine release in LPS‐tolerant cells and in the effects of artesunate.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Artesunate's (AS) effect is autophagy‐dependent through VDR in vitro. (a) Effect of Atg16l1 siRNA on TNF‐α (a1) and IL‐6 (a2) levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). (b) Effect of bafilomycin (Baf) (10 ng·ml−1) on TNF‐α (b1) and IL‐6 (b1) levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). (c) Effect of 3‐MA (5 mM) on TNF‐α (c1) and IL‐6 (c2) levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). (d) Effect of 3‐MA, Ly294002 (10 μM), or Baf on the bacterial clearance in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 8). (e1) LPS increased the protein levels of LC3B‐I, LC3B‐II and ATG5 in a dose‐dependent manner in RAW264.7 cells. (e2) The protein levels of LC3B‐I, LC3B‐II and ATG5 over time in RAW264.7 cells treated with LPS (100 ng·ml−1). The level of expression peaked at 1 h. (f) Representative image of immunofluorescence staining of LC3B in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (bar = 2 μm). (f1) Relative fluorescent puncta indicating LC3B aggregation were quantified from 100 cells; the number in the medium group was normalized as 1 (f2). (g) The protein levels of LC3B‐II, ATG16L1 and ATG5 in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS. (h) Changes in LC3B‐II, ATG16L1 and ATG5 protein levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells (Vdr‐KD) treated with AS. (i) Changes in LC3B‐II, ATG16L1 and ATG5 protein levels in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells (Vdr‐OE) treated with AS. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; ns, not significant; * P < 0.05

Second, three autophagy inhibitors, 3‐MA targeting Vps34; Bafilomycin A1 blocking autophagosome and lysosome fusion; and LY294002 targeting Vps34 (also known as PI3K catalytic subunit type 3), were used in RAW264.7 cells. TNF‐α and IL‐6 levels in LPS cells decreased and artesunate‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐6 increase in LPS‐tolerant cells were significantly eliminated after pre‐incubation with bafilomycin A1 (Figure 5b) and 3‐MA (Figure 5c). Furthermore, artesunate markedly reduced the bacterial load in LPS‐tolerant cells challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and this effect was abrogated by pre‐incubation with 3‐MA, LY294002, or bafilomycin A1 (Figure 5d). These results indicated a potential correlation between autophagy and the effect of artesunate.

Third, the influence of artesunate on autophagy‐related molecules was further investigated. Markers such as the conversion of microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3B‐I) (18 kDa) to LC3B‐II (16 kDa) and the accumulation of autophagy related 5 (ATG5) were selected to evaluate autophagy activity (Schaaf, Keulers, Vooijs, & Rouschop, 2016). LPS treatment increased LC3B‐II and ATG5 levels dose‐dependently (Figure 5e1), which was consistent with the results that LPS induced pro‐inflammatory cytokines release in a dose‐dependent manner (Figure 2a). This further suggested that LPS‐induced cytokine release is autophagy involved. Immunoblotting showed that LC3B‐II and ATG5 levels changed with time in LPS‐tolerant cells and peaked at 1 h (Figure 5e2), which was selected as the best time point to observe LPS‐induced autophagic activities.

Fourth, immunofluorescence staining, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunoblotting results revealed that autophagy was remarkably decreased in LPS‐tolerant cells relative to LPS cells and could be reversed by artesunate treatment (Figures S4b, 5f and 5g). These results indicated that autophagy decline is associated with the LPS‐tolerant phenotype and artesunate treatment potentiated autophagic activities.

Last, in LPS‐tolerant cells, LC3B‐II and ATG5 levels increased markedly in Vdr‐KD group compared with that in the negative control and artesunate addition had no effect (Figure 5h). artesunate‐induced LC3B‐II and ATG5 increase in LPS‐tolerant cells was abrogated by overexpressing Vdr (Figure 5i). These findings indicated that artesunate's autophagy‐dependent effects act through VDR in vitro.

3.6. Artesunate inhibits the interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65 in vitro

Transcription factor NF‐κB regulates the transcription of many pro‐inflammatory cytokines including TNF‐α and IL‐6 (Bonizzi & Karin, 2004). VDR physically interacts with NF‐κB p65 in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells and intestinal cells (Sun et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2010); the functional relevance of this interaction in LPS‐tolerant macrophages remains unclear. Co‐IP and fluorescent co‐localization experiments were performed, which showed that the associated NF‐κB p65 level in the cytoplasm showed no significant change in the medium cells, LPS cells and LPS‐tolerant cells when an equal amount of VDR was used as a control (pull‐down by VDR); the NF‐κB p65 level was significantly decreased by artesunate treatment (Figure 6a1). However, artesunate had no effect on the associated NF‐κB p65 protein in the nucleus in any treatment in which an equal amount of VDR was used as a control (pull‐down by VDR) (Figure 6a2). Thus, artesunate might bind VDR to interrupt its interaction with NF‐κB p65 in the cytoplasm, further implying that artesunate affects NF‐κB p65 activity.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Artesunate (AS) inhibits the physical interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65 in LPS‐tolerant macrophages. RAW264.7 cells were treated as described in the legend of Figure 2d. (a) The cytoplasm (a1) and nuclear (a2) lysate were used for an IP experiment using anti‐VDR antibodies and the associated NF‐κB p65 (p65) was detected by immunoblotting (IB). (b) Immunostaining to observe the co‐localization of p65 and VDR. p65 was probed using Alexa Fluor 488 (green). VDR was probed using Alexa Fluor 555 (red). Representative images are shown (bar = 5 μm) (b1). The co‐localization of VDR and p65 (b2) and the karyoplasmic ratio of p65 (b3) was quantified from 100 cells (normalized to medium). (c) The p65 level in the nuclear lysate was detected using elisa and WB. (d) Change in the p65 level in Vdr‐KD (d1) or Vdr‐OE (d2) LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS. (e) Change in the TNF‐α level in p65‐KD (e1) or p65‐OE (e2) LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells treated with AS (n = 5). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; ns, not significant; * P < 0.05

Subsequently, immunostaining was used to determine whether artesunate affected the intracellular co‐localization and distribution of VDR and NF‐κB p65. Co‐localization of VDR and NF‐κB p65 was observed in LPS‐tolerant cells, which was significantly inhibited by artesunate (Figure 6b1,b2). Moreover, NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation declined markedly in LPS‐tolerant cells relative to LPS cells, which was reversed by artesunate treatment (Figure 6b1,b3). These results indicated that high levels of VDR interacted with NF‐κB p65 to prevent its nuclear translocation. Notably, artesunate inhibited the interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65, accelerating NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation. For confirmation, the nuclear protein level of NF‐κB p65 was investigated using elisa and immunoblotting, which showed that nuclear NF‐κB p65 levels decreased markedly in LPS‐tolerant cells relative to LPS cells, which was reversed by artesunate (Figure 6c1,c2). In LPS‐tolerant cells, the nuclear NF‐κB p65 level increased in the Vdr‐KD group compared with that in the negative control, leading to a loss of the tolerant phenotype (Figure 6d1). In Vdr‐OE cells, the nuclear NF‐κB p65 level decreased markedly suppressed compared with that in the negative control and artesunate treatment had no effect in LPS‐tolerant cells (Figure 6d2). To determine whether artesunate‐induced pro‐inflammatory cytokines release in LPS‐tolerant cells is related to its influence on NF‐κB p65 activity, NF‐κB p65 expression in RAW264.7 was modified (Figure S5a,b). Knockdown of NF‐κB p65 reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokine release and abrogated artesunate's effect (Figure 6e1). Overexpression of NF‐κB p65 led to loss of the LPS‐tolerant phenotype and artesunate addition had no effect (Figure 6e2). These findings indicated that artesunate inhibited the physical interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65 in LPS‐tolerant macrophages, promoting NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation and downstream pro‐inflammatory cytokine release.

3.7. Knockdown of Vdr results in the loss of the effect of artesunate in vivo

To verify the in vitro findings, the mRNA and protein levels of Vdr were measured in CLP mice. The levels of Vdr mRNA and protein significantly increased in peritoneal macrophages of CLP mice but were markedly inhibited by artesunate (Figure 7a), which was consistent with the in vitro results. In Vdr‐KD CLP mice, in which Vdr expression was knocked down using a lentiviral vector harbouring a Vdr RNAi sequence (Vdr‐KD) (Figure S6a,b), TNF‐α levels in the spleen and lungs increased significantly compared with those in the negative control and artesunate administration had no effect (Figure 7b). This suggested that Vdr overexpression is involved in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression formation and knockdown of Vdr would lead to a loss of the immunosuppressive phenotype. Immunoblotting results showed that autophagy‐associated protein levels in the spleen of CLP mice were increased compared with those in the negative control and artesunate treatment had no effect (Figure 7c). Taken together, the in vivo and in vitro results indicated that the VDR plays an important role in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression and the effects of artesunate.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Knockdown of Vdr results in the loss of the effect of artesunate (AS) in vivo. (a) Effect of AS on the Vdr mRNA level of peritoneal macrophages (PMs) from caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mice (n = 5). (b) Effect of AS on the VDR protein level of PMs from CLP mice. (c) Change in the effect of AS on the level of TNF‐α and IL‐6 in the spleen (c1) and lungs (c2) from Vdr‐KD mice (n = 5). (d) Changes in the levels of LC3B‐I, LC3B‐II, ATG16L and ATG5 protein levels in the spleens of Vdr‐KD mice. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; ns, non‐significant; * P < 0.05

4. DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrated that artesunate interacts with vitamin D receptor (VDR; nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 1, NR1I1) to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in an autophagy and NF‐κB‐dependent manner. Together with our previous results (Kuang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2008), artesunate not only inhibits pro‐inflammatory cytokine release during the hyper‐inflammation stage but also enhances pro‐inflammatory cytokine release and bacterial clearance by macrophages, thus reversing sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in vivo and in vitro, demonstrating that artesunate exhibits a bidirectional immunoregulating effect for sepsis treatment, which is not reported previously.

Sepsis is a life‐threatening condition caused by a dysregulated host response to infection such as bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic infection (Singer et al., 2016). Recently, reversing sepsis‐induced immunosuppression has become the focus of sepsis research, instead of targeting the cytokine storm (Cohen, 2002; Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Kox et al., 2000; Prucha et al., 2017). However, drugs in current clinical trials, such as anti‐programmed cell death receptor‐1 (anti‐PD‐1) and anti‐PD‐L1 antibodies, might only affect the immunosuppression stage (Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Prucha et al., 2017) and their clinical efficacies remain to be proven. Therefore, we consider that an ideal immunotherapy for sepsis should exert an anti‐inflammatory effect during the cytokine storm stage and increase the resistance to infection during the immunosuppression stage. The therapeutic effects of artesunate on the cytokine storm stage and its possible mechanism have been proved in our previous study (Kuang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010). The results of the present study revealed artesunate's additional therapeutic effects in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in vivo and in vitro.

Active VDR binds preferentially as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) to hexameric repeats on vitamin D response elements in the promoter regions of target genes (Haussler et al., 1998; Orlov, Rochel, Moras, & Klaholz, 2012). VDR/RXR heterodimer nuclear translocation functions to recruit additional cofactors that play an essential role in transcription (Haussler et al., 1998). Thus, TCMSP predicted VDR as an artesunate interacting molecule and was then identified using PCR and western blotting. Moreover, we found that in LPS‐tolerant cells (mimicking the immunosuppression stage of sepsis), VDR was highly expressed and its nuclear translocation increased compared with that in LPS cells (mimicking the cytokines storm stage), while artesunate treatment markedly inhibited VDR expression and nuclear translocation. Furthermore, the artesunate–VDR interaction was confirmed using binding assays. Thus, artesunate might interact with VDR to inactivate it, thereby inhibiting its nuclear translocation. The effects of artesunate were investigated in presence and in absence of VD3, the natural ligand of VDR. artesunate's effect was eliminated when pre‐incubated with VD3, demonstrating antagonism between VD3 and artesunate, suggesting that artesunate might bind to the same receptor even similar sites as VD3.

Although the anti‐inflammation or immunosuppressive effect of VD3 is tightly related to VDR function (Alroy, Towers, & Freedman, 1995; Joshi et al., 2011; Lemire et al., 1985), few studies have addressed the direct role of VDR in sepsis‐induced immunosuppression. Our results demonstrated that the excessive high levels of VDR during the immunosuppression stage of sepsis might be related to the decreased inflammatory response. Indeed, artesunate increased the survival rate of septic animals by inhibiting the excessive high expression of VDR.

Autophagy participates in the defence against infection by eliminating intracellular pathogens and regulating inflammation (Casanova, 2017). Autophagy has been considered a new target in sepsis treatment (Ren et al., 2017). Combined with our previous study (Kuang et al., 2018), we considered that autophagy was enhanced in early sepsis stage (cytokine storm stage) but suppressed in late sepsis (immunosuppression stage). Our results showed artesunate enhanced autophagy in LPS‐tolerant cells to eliminate bacteria. Inhibiting autophagy using Atg16l1 siRNA or autophagy inhibitors abrogated artesunate's effects on bacteria clearance and cytokine releases, demonstrating that autophagy plays a crucial part in artesunate's effect.

VDR is involved in immunoregulation and resistance to infections via regulating autophagy (Baeke, Takiishi, Korf, Gysemans, & Mathieu, 2010; Gois, Ferreira, Olenski, & Seguro, 2017). VDR transcriptionally regulates Atg16l1, which is an important autophagy‐related protein. Decreased VDR reduces ATG16L1 levels associated with abnormal Paneth cells in chronic states of mucosal inflammation (Sun, 2016). However, we observed tight binding between VDR and Atg16l1 promotor, leading to low ATG16L1 protein levels in LPS‐tolerant cells, demonstrating negative regulation by VDR on Atg16l1 transcription in LPS‐tolerant cells, which did not change in presence of VD3. Most effects of VDR on ATG16L1 and autophagy were investigated in epithelial cells (Huang, 2016; Sun, 2016) but not in monocytes/macrophages. Our study focused on the immunosuppression stage in monocytes/macrophages, unlike the parenchyma cells such as epithelial cells which were not immunosuppressed. Thus, there might be differences between two different kinds of cells. Moreover, considering that artesunate inhibited VDR expression to up‐regulate Atg16l1 transcription and increase autophagy, we speculated that the discrepancy in the transcriptional regulation between VDR and Atg16l1 might due to the differences in the inflammation and immune status, which will require further investigation in the future.

The NF‐κB signalling pathway links pathogenic and cellular danger signals, thus organizing cellular resistance to invading pathogens and forming a network hub responsible for complex biological signalling (Albensi & Mattson, 2000; Kaltschmidt & Kaltschmidt, 2009). NF‐κB p65 physically interacts with VDR in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells and intestinal cells (Sun et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2010). Previously, we showed that artesunate significantly inhibited LPS‐induced toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4)/TRAF6/NF‐κB activation in macrophages, reducing pro‐inflammatory cytokine release (Kuang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2008) and thus playing an anti‐inflammatory role. Herein, we focused on its function in sepsis immunosuppression and have shown that VDR negatively regulates NF‐κB p65 via their physical interaction in macrophages. Importantly, artesunate disrupted the VDR–NF‐κB p65 interaction in LPS‐tolerant cells, markedly increasing nuclear NF‐κB p65 translocation and downstream target gene expression, such as TNF‐α and IL‐6. Furthermore, artesunate decreased VDR binding to the promoter of Atg16l1, leading to reduced VDR nuclear translocation and decreasing the negative transcription of Atg16l1. Lastly, artesunate enhanced autophagy activities through binding to VDR. In the immunosuppression stage, Vdr knockdown reversed autophagy‐related protein levels and Vdr overexpression resulted in the loss of artesunate‐induced autophagy‐related protein increase. Thus, artesunate's interaction with VDR to reverse immunosuppression involves autophagy. We speculated that artesunate interacts with VDR to inhibit nuclear translocation of VDR and inhibited the interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65 in LPS‐tolerant macrophages. This would promote NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation, enhance autophagy and activate NF‐κB p65 target gene transcription, such as pro‐inflammatory cytokine genes.

VDR is the receptor for VD3. Does VD3 control VDR to achieve an anti‐sepsis effect? Although clinical investigation have shown a close correlation between vitamin D deficiency in serum and excess morbidity and mortality of sepsis, suggesting that vitamin D deficiency is closely related to sepsis (Dickerson et al., 2016), it remains conflicting whether vitamin D supplementation improves the outcome of patients with sepsis (Kearns, Alvarez, Seidel, & Tangpricha, 2015; Putzu et al., 2017). The extensive biological effects of vitamin D and its role in homeostasis maintenance require a maintained physiological concentration of vitamin D. Noteworthily, based on our results that excessive vitamin D induces increases VDR expression and subsequent suppressed immune function, excessive vitamin D supplementation might be harmful rather than beneficial.

To date, the outcome of therapy only aimed at a single stage of sepsis has been disappointing, possibly because the treatment time window is important for the therapeutic regimen of sepsis, but difficult to handle. Anti‐inflammatory treatment in the hypo‐inflammatory stage or pro‐inflammatory therapy in the hyper‐inflammatory stage failed or even increased mortality in clinic (Hotchkiss et al., 2013a; Rudick, Cornell, & Agrawal, 2017). Therefore, we considered that an immunoregulator might be an ideal drug to treat sepsis caused by bacterial or virus without limitation of treatment time. Based on our previous and present results, artesunate might be a bidirectional immunoregulator for both the hyper‐ and hypo‐inflammatory stages of sepsis even caused by COVID‐19.

Mechanistically, artesunate exerts its “pro‐inflammatory” effect in the immunosuppression stage in contrast to its “anti‐inflammatory” effect in the cytokines storm stage. Our present results showed a schematic of the mechanism of artesunate's effect through two ways:‐ artesunate interacts with VDR, to preventing its nuclear translocation of VDR, which decreases its negative regulation of autophagy‐related target genes, such as Atg16l1, and increases autophagy. Additionally, artesunate interaction with VDR prevents the VDR–NF‐κB p65 interaction, promoting the nuclear translocation of NF‐κB p65, leading to increased transcription of its target genes, such as pro‐inflammatory cytokines (Figure 8). These two actions increase bacterial clearance and pro‐inflammatory cytokine release from macrophages.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Flow chart of the mechanism of action of artesunate (AS). AS interacts with vitamin D receptor (VDR) to prevent the nuclear translocation of VDR and decrease its negative regulation of autophagy‐related target genes such as Atg16l1, which increases autophagy activity. Additionally, AS interacts with VDR to prevent the interaction between VDR and NF‐κB p65, which increases the nuclear translocation of NF‐κB p65, leading to increased transcription of its target genes, such as pro‐inflammatory cytokines

Although the monocytes/macrophages system plays a vital role in sepsis, the acquired immune system is equally important. However, the effect of artesunate on T and B cell function remains to be investigated. Considering the therapeutic effect of artesunate on caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mouse models, we believe that artesunate could improve T and B cells function during sepsis. Artesunate interacts with VDR, however more work is required to determine whether VDR is a target of artesunate. Overall, our findings provide evidence that artesunate interacts with VDR to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in an autophagy and NF‐κB‐dependent manner, highlighting a novel approach for the treatment of sepsis and the drug repurposing of artesunate as a bidirectional immunomodulator.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

S.S., J.W. and X.L. performed the study under the guidance of H.Z. and S.S. collected and analysed the data. H.Z. and S.S. wrote the manuscript. X.L. and P.L. contributed to establishing the mouse models. S.S. and L.X. performed the bacteria clearance experiments. S.S. and J.W. were responsible for the molecular biology experiments. Y.W. and X.C. completed the bioinformatics analysis. H.Z., J.Z., S.L. and S.S. contributed to discussions. H.Z., J.Z. and S.L. revised the manuscript. H.Z. is the guarantor of this work, has full access to all the data and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DECLARATION OF TRANSPARENCY AND SCIENTIFIC RIGOUR

This Declaration acknowledges that this paper adheres to the principles for transparent reporting and scientific rigour of preclinical research as stated in the BJP guidelines for Design & Analysis, Immunoblotting and Immunochemistry, and Animal Experimentation and as recommended by funding agencies, publishers and other organizations engaged with supporting research.

Supporting information

Figure S1. Cytotoxicity of LPS toward RAW264.7 cells (n = 5). (a) The OD490 value of LPS (2.5–200 ng/mL) treatment for 4 h or for 24 h in RAW264.7 cells. (b) The OD490 value of treatment groups (LPS5 + LPS100, LPS5 + LPS100 + AS and LPS100 + AS) for 4 h or for 24 h in RAW264.7 cells. One‐way ANOVA.

Figure S2. Efficiency of modified VDR. (a) Vdr mRNA level in the Vdr‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells knocked down by a Vdr siRNA (a1) and lentivirus vector harboring a Vdr shRNA (a2). (b) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in Vdr‐OE and NC‐OE RAW264.7 cells. Student's t test; * P < 0.05.

Figure S3. Effect of VD3 (100 nM) on the mRNA level of Vdr and Atg16l1 in LPS treated cells and LPS‐tolerant cells. (a‐b) Effect of VD3 (100 nM) on the mRNA level of Atg16l1 in LPS treated cells and LPS‐tolerant cells in RAW 264.7 cells (a) and THP‐1 cells (b). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; *P < 0.05.

Figure S4. AS's effect is related to VDR‐regulated autophagy. (a) Vdr mRNA level in the Vdr‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells. (b) Effect of AS on autophagy vesicles in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells under transmission electron microscopy. Student's t test; * P < 0.05.

Figure S5. Efficiency of modified NF‐κB P65. (a) Immunoblotting assays of NF‐κB p65 (p65) in p65‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells. (b) Immunoblotting assays of NF‐κB p65 in p65‐OE and NC‐OE RAW264.7 cells.

Figure S6. Efficiency of VDR knockdown in the lungs and spleen. (a) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in the spleen of NC‐KD and Vdr‐KD mice. (b) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in the lungs of NC‐KD and Vdr‐KD mice.

Table S1. Antibodies for Immunofluorescence and Western blotting

Table S2. Primer sequences for Real‐time PCR

Table S3. Promoter specific sequences for Atg16l1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81872914, 81772137 and 81673495), Major National Science and Technology Program of China for Innovative Drug (2017ZX09101002‐002‐009) and the fourth batch of “Thousand People Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents Fund” in Guizhou Province, Shijingshan's Tutor Studio of Pharmacology. We sincerely thank Qin Ouyang for his meaningful advice regarding drug targets, Prof. Qiaonan Guo for her electron microscopy assistance and all members of the Zheng laboratory for their help and support. We sincerely thank Dongmei Deng, Bin Li, Mei Kuang, Rongxin Qin, Xichun Pan, Yanyan Cen, Chao Liu, Xiaoli Chen, Zhaoxia Zhai, Yongling Lu and Yan Wang from the Third Military Medical University. We also sincerely thank Huang Chao and Xuetong Chen from the Northwest University for their assistance in this study.

Shang S, Wu J, Li X, et al. Artesunate interacts with the vitamin D receptor to reverse sepsis‐induced immunosuppression in a mouse model via enhancing autophagy. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:4147–4165. 10.1111/bph.15158

Contributor Information

Songqing Liu, Email: songqingliu@hotmail.com.

Jiang Zheng, Email: zhengj99219@163.com.

Hong Zhou, Email: zhouh64@163.com.

REFERENCES

  1. Albensi, B. C. , & Mattson, M. P. (2000). Evidence for the involvement of TNF and NF‐κB in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Synapse, 35, 151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, S. P. H. , Cidlowski, J. A. , Kelly, E. , Mathie, A. , Peters, J. A. , Veale, E. L. , … CGTP Collaborators . (2019). The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Nuclear hormone receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology, 176(Suppl 1), S229–S246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, S. P. H. , Roberts, R. E. , Broughton, B. R. S. , Sobey, C. G. , George, C. H. , Stanford, S. C. , … Ahluwalia, A. (2018). Goals and practicalities of immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry: A guide for submission to the British Journal of Pharmacology . British Journal of Pharmacology, 175, 407–411. 10.1111/bph.14112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alroy, I. , Towers, T. L. , & Freedman, L. P. (1995). Transcriptional repression of the interleukin‐2 gene by vitamin D3: Direct inhibition of NFATp/AP‐1 complex formation by a nuclear hormone receptor. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 15, 5789–5799. 10.1128/MCB.15.10.5789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Angus, D. C. , & van der Poll, T. (2013). Severe sepsis and septic shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369, 840–851. 10.1056/NEJMra1208623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baeke, F. , Gysemans, C. , Korf, H. , & Mathieu, C. (2010). Vitamin D insufficiency: Implications for the immune system. Pediatric Nephrology, 25, 1597–1606. 10.1007/s00467-010-1452-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baeke, F. , Takiishi, T. , Korf, H. , Gysemans, C. , & Mathieu, C. (2010). Vitamin D: Modulator of the immune system. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 10, 482–496. 10.1016/j.coph.2010.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonizzi, G. , & Karin, M. (2004). The two NF‐κB activation pathways and their role in innate and adaptive immunity. Trends in Immunology, 25, 280–288. 10.1016/j.it.2004.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bretin, A. , Carriere, J. , Dalmasso, G. , Bergougnoux, A. , B'Chir, W. , Maurin, A. C. , … Nguyen, H. T. T. (2016). Activation of the EIF2AK4‐EIF2A/eIF2α‐ATF4 pathway triggers autophagy response to Crohn disease‐associated adherent‐invasive Escherichia coli infection. Autophagy, 12, 770–783. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1156823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burrows, J. N. , Chibale, K. , & Wells, T. N. (2011). The state of the art in anti‐malarial drug discovery and development. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 11, 1226–1254. 10.2174/156802611795429194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Casanova, J. E. (2017). Bacterial autophagy: Offense and defense at the host‐pathogen interface. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 4, 237–243. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, R. L. , White, T. E. , Clode, S. A. , Gaunt, I. , Winstanley, P. , & Ward, S. A. (2004). Developmental toxicity of artesunate and an artesunate combination in the rat and rabbit. Birth Defects Research. Part B, Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, 71, 380–394. 10.1002/bdrb.20027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, J. (2002). The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature, 420, 885–891. 10.1038/nature01326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Curtis, M. J. , Alexander, S. , Cirino, G. , Docherty, J. R. , George, C. H. , Giembycz, M. A. , … Ahluwalia, A. (2018). Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: Updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers. British Journal of Pharmacology, 175, 987–993. 10.1111/bph.14153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng, D. , Li, X. , Liu, C. , Zhai, Z. , Li, B. , Kuang, M. , … Zhou, H. (2017). Systematic investigation on the turning point of over‐inflammation to immunosuppression in CLP mice model and their characteristics. International Immunopharmacology, 42, 49–58. 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickerson, R. N. , Van Cleve, J. R. , Swanson, J. M. , Maish, G. O. 3rd , Minard, G. , Croce, M. A. , & Brown, R. O. (2016). Vitamin D deficiency in critically ill patients with traumatic injuries. Burns Trauma, 4, 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Efferth, T. , Dunstan, H. , Sauerbrey, A. , Miyachi, H. , & Chitambar, C. R. (2001). The anti‐malarial artesunate is also active against cancer. International Journal of Oncology, 18, 767–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gois, P. H. F. , Ferreira, D. , Olenski, S. , & Seguro, A. C. (2017). Vitamin D and infectious diseases: Simple bystander or contributing factor? Nutrients, 9, 651 10.3390/nu9070651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gutierrez, M. G. , Master, S. S. , Singh, S. B. , Taylor, G. A. , Colombo, M. I. , & Deretic, V. (2004). Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell, 119, 753–766. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harding, S. D. , Sharman, J. L. , Faccenda, E. , Southan, C. , Pawson, A. J. , Ireland, S. , … NC‐IUPHAR . (2018). The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2018: Updates and expansion to encompass the new guide to IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY. Nucleic Acids Research, 46, D1091–D1106. 10.1093/nar/gkx1121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haussler, M. R. , Jurutka, P. W. , Mizwicki, M. , & Norman, A. W. (2011). Vitamin D receptor (VDR)‐mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)2vitamin D(3): Genomic and non‐genomic mechanisms. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 25, 543–559. 10.1016/j.beem.2011.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haussler, M. R. , Whitfield, G. K. , Haussler, C. A. , Hsieh, J. C. , Thompson, P. D. , Selznick, S. H. , … Jurutka, P. W. (1998). The nuclear vitamin D receptor: Biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 13, 325–349. 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ho, J. , Yu, J. , Wong, S. H. , Zhang, L. , Liu, X. D. , Wong, W. T. , … Wu, W. K. K. (2016). Autophagy in sepsis: Degradation into exhaustion? Autophagy, 12, 1073–1082. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1179410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hotchkiss, R. S. , Monneret, G. , & Payen, D. (2013a). Immunosuppression in sepsis: A novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13, 260–268. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70001-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hotchkiss, R. S. , Monneret, G. , & Payen, D. (2013b). Sepsis‐induced immunosuppression: From cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 13, 862–874. 10.1038/nri3552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang, F. C. (2016). Vitamin D differentially regulates Salmonella‐induced intestine epithelial autophagy and interleukin‐1β expression. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 22, 10353–10363. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hutchins, N. A. , Unsinger, J. , Hotchkiss, R. S. , & Ayala, A. (2014). The new normal: Immunomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 20, 224–233. 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Joshi, S. , Pantalena, L. C. , Liu, X. K. , Gaffen, S. L. , Liu, H. , Rohowsky‐Kochan, C. , … Youssef, S. (2011). 1,25‐Dihydroxyvitamin D3 ameliorates Th17 autoimmunity via transcriptional modulation of interleukin‐17A. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 31, 3653–3669. 10.1128/MCB.05020-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaltschmidt, B. , & Kaltschmidt, C. (2009). NF‐κB in the nervous system. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 1, a001271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kearns, M. D. , Alvarez, J. A. , Seidel, N. , & Tangpricha, V. (2015). Impact of vitamin D on infectious disease. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 349, 245–262. 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kilkenny, C. , Browne, W. , Cuthill, I. C. , Emerson, M. , Altman, D. G. , & Group NCRRGW . (2010). Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines. British Journal of Pharmacology, 160, 1577–1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kox, W. J. , Volk, T. , Kox, S. N. , & Volk, H. D. (2000). Immunomodulatory therapies in sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine, 26(Suppl 1), S124–S128. 10.1007/s001340051129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuang, M. , Cen, Y. , Qin, R. , Shang, S. , Zhai, Z. , Liu, C. , … Zhou, H. (2018). Artesunate attenuates pro‐inflammatory cytokine release from macrophages by inhibiting TLR4‐mediated autophagic activation via the TRAF6‐Beclin1‐PI3KC3 pathway. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 475–488. 10.1159/000489982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lemire, J. M. , Adams, J. S. , Kermani‐Arab, V. , Bakke, A. C. , Sakai, R. , & Jordan, S. C. (1985). 1,25‐Dihydroxyvitamin D3 suppresses human T helper/inducer lymphocyte activity in vitro. Journal of Immunology, 134, 3032–3035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Levine, B. , Mizushima, N. , & Virgin, H. W. (2011). Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature, 469, 323–335. 10.1038/nature09782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, B. , Li, J. , Pan, X. , Ding, G. , Cao, H. , Jiang, W. , … Zhou, H. (2010). Artesunate protects sepsis model mice challenged with Staphylococcus aureus by decreasing TNF‐α release via inhibition TLR2 and Nod2 mRNA expressions and transcription factor NF‐κB activation. International Immunopharmacology, 10, 344–350. 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, B. , Zhang, R. , Li, J. , Zhang, L. , Ding, G. , Luo, P. , … Zhou, H. (2008). Antimalarial artesunate protects sepsis model mice against heat‐killed Escherichia coli challenge by decreasing TLR4, TLR9 mRNA expressions and transcription factor NF‐κB activation. International Immunopharmacology, 8, 379–389. 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, J. , Diao, B. , Guo, S. , Huang, X. , Yang, C. , Feng, Z. , … Wu, Y. (2017). VSIG4 inhibits proinflammatory macrophage activation by reprogramming mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism. Nature Communications, 8, 1322 10.1038/s41467-017-01327-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Y. , Zhang, P. , Wang, C. , Han, C. , Meng, J. , Liu, X. , … Cao, X. (2013). Immune responsive gene 1 (IRG1) promotes endotoxin tolerance by increasing A20 expression in macrophages through reactive oxygen species. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288, 16225–16234. 10.1074/jbc.M113.454538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Livak, K. J. , & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real‐time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔC T method. Methods, 25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Miranda, A. S. , Brant, F. , Rocha, N. P. , Cisalpino, D. , Rodrigues, D. H. , Souza, D. G. , … Campos, A. C. (2013). Further evidence for an anti‐inflammatory role of artesunate in experimental cerebral malaria. Malaria Journal, 12, 388 10.1186/1475-2875-12-388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morizono, K. , Xie, Y. , Ringpis, G. E. , Johnson, M. , Nassanian, H. , Lee, B. , … Chen, I. S. Y. (2005). Lentiviral vector retargeting to P‐glycoprotein on metastatic melanoma through intravenous injection. Nature Medicine, 11, 346–352. 10.1038/nm1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Orlov, I. , Rochel, N. , Moras, D. , & Klaholz, B. P. (2012). Structure of the full human RXR/VDR nuclear receptor heterodimer complex with its DR3 target DNA. The EMBO Journal, 31, 291–300. 10.1038/emboj.2011.445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Prucha, M. , Zazula, R. , & Russwurm, S. (2017). Immunotherapy of sepsis: Blind alley or call for personalized assessment? Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis (Warsz), 65, 37–49. 10.1007/s00005-016-0415-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Putzu, A. , Belletti, A. , Cassina, T. , Clivio, S. , Monti, G. , Zangrillo, A. , & Landoni, G. (2017). Vitamin D and outcomes in adult critically ill patients. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials. Journal of Critical Care, 38, 109–114. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ren, C. , Zhang, H. , Wu, T. T. , & Yao, Y. M. (2017). Autophagy: A potential therapeutic target for reversing sepsis‐induced immunosuppression. Frontiers in Immunology, 8, 1832 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rittirsch, D. , Huber‐Lang, M. S. , Flierl, M. A. , & Ward, P. A. (2009). Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nature Protocols, 4, 31–36. 10.1038/nprot.2008.214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ru, J. , Li, P. , Wang, J. , Zhou, W. , Li, B. , Huang, C. , … Yang, L. (2014). TCMSP: A database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. Journal of Cheminformatics, 6, 13 10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rudick, C. P. , Cornell, D. L. , & Agrawal, D. K. (2017). Single versus combined immunoregulatory approach using PD‐1 and CTLA‐4 modulators in controlling sepsis. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, 13, 907–919. 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1357469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schaaf, M. B. , Keulers, T. G. , Vooijs, M. A. , & Rouschop, K. M. (2016). LC3/GABARAP family proteins: Autophagy‐(un)related functions. The FASEB Journal, 30, 3961–3978. 10.1096/fj.201600698R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Singer, M. , Deutschman, C. S. , Seymour, C. W. , Shankar‐Hari, M. , Annane, D. , Bauer, M. , … Angus, D. C. (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis‐3). Jama‐Journal of the American Medical Association, 315, 801–810. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Skrupky, L. P. , Kerby, P. W. , & Hotchkiss, R. S. (2011). Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects. Anesthesiology, 115, 1349–1362. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823422e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Steinbeck, C. , Han, Y. , Kuhn, S. , Horlacher, O. , Luttmann, E. , & Willighagen, E. (2003). The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open‐source Java library for Chemo‐ and Bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 43, 493–500. 10.1021/ci025584y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sun, J. (2016). VDR/vitamin D receptor regulates autophagic activity through ATG16L1. Autophagy, 12, 1057–1058. 10.1080/15548627.2015.1072670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun, J. , Kong, J. , Duan, Y. , Szeto, F. L. , Liao, A. , Madara, J. L. , & Li, Y. C. (2006). Increased NF‐κB activity in fibroblasts lacking the vitamin D receptor. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 291, E315–E322. 10.1152/ajpendo.00590.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, J. , Zhang, J. , Shi, Y. , Xu, C. , Zhang, C. , Wong, Y. K. , … Lin, Q. (2017). Mechanistic investigation of the specific anticancer property of artemisinin and its combination with aminolevulinic acid for enhanced anticolorectal cancer activity. ACS Central Science, 3, 743–750. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wu, S. , Liao, A. P. , Xia, Y. , Li, Y. C. , Li, J. D. , Sartor, R. B. , & Sun, J. (2010). Vitamin D receptor negatively regulates bacterial‐stimulated NF‐κB activity in intestine. The American Journal of Pathology, 177, 686–697. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu, S. , & Sun, J. (2011). Vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, and macroautophagy in inflammation and infection. Discovery Medicine, 11, 325–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, S. , Zhang, Y. G. , Lu, R. , Xia, Y. , Zhou, D. , Petrof, E. O. , … Sun, J. (2015). Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor deletion leads to defective autophagy in colitis. Gut, 64, 1082–1094. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zheng, C. , Guo, Z. , Huang, C. , Wu, Z. , Li, Y. , Chen, X. , … Wang, Y. (2015). Large‐scale direct targeting for drug repositioning and discovery. Scientific Reports, 5, 11970 10.1038/srep11970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Cytotoxicity of LPS toward RAW264.7 cells (n = 5). (a) The OD490 value of LPS (2.5–200 ng/mL) treatment for 4 h or for 24 h in RAW264.7 cells. (b) The OD490 value of treatment groups (LPS5 + LPS100, LPS5 + LPS100 + AS and LPS100 + AS) for 4 h or for 24 h in RAW264.7 cells. One‐way ANOVA.

Figure S2. Efficiency of modified VDR. (a) Vdr mRNA level in the Vdr‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells knocked down by a Vdr siRNA (a1) and lentivirus vector harboring a Vdr shRNA (a2). (b) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in Vdr‐OE and NC‐OE RAW264.7 cells. Student's t test; * P < 0.05.

Figure S3. Effect of VD3 (100 nM) on the mRNA level of Vdr and Atg16l1 in LPS treated cells and LPS‐tolerant cells. (a‐b) Effect of VD3 (100 nM) on the mRNA level of Atg16l1 in LPS treated cells and LPS‐tolerant cells in RAW 264.7 cells (a) and THP‐1 cells (b). One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test; *P < 0.05.

Figure S4. AS's effect is related to VDR‐regulated autophagy. (a) Vdr mRNA level in the Vdr‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells. (b) Effect of AS on autophagy vesicles in LPS‐tolerant RAW264.7 cells under transmission electron microscopy. Student's t test; * P < 0.05.

Figure S5. Efficiency of modified NF‐κB P65. (a) Immunoblotting assays of NF‐κB p65 (p65) in p65‐KD and NC‐KD RAW264.7 cells. (b) Immunoblotting assays of NF‐κB p65 in p65‐OE and NC‐OE RAW264.7 cells.

Figure S6. Efficiency of VDR knockdown in the lungs and spleen. (a) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in the spleen of NC‐KD and Vdr‐KD mice. (b) Immunoblotting assays of VDR in the lungs of NC‐KD and Vdr‐KD mice.

Table S1. Antibodies for Immunofluorescence and Western blotting

Table S2. Primer sequences for Real‐time PCR

Table S3. Promoter specific sequences for Atg16l1


Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES