Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLDs), especially nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), have become a major cause of liver transplant and liver-associated death. However, the pathogenesis of NASH is still unclear. Currently, there is no FDA-approved medication to treat this devastating disease. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) senses energy status and regulates metabolic processes to maintain homeostasis. The activity of AMPK is regulated by the availability of nutrients, such as carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acids. AMPK activity is increased by nutrient deprivation and inhibited by overnutrition, inflammation, and hypersecretion of certain anabolic hormones, such as insulin, during obesity. The repression of hepatic AMPK activity permits the transition from simple steatosis to hepatocellular death; thus, activation might ameliorate multiple aspects of NASH. Here we review the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the impact of AMPK activity state on hepatic steatosis, inflammation, liver injury, and fibrosis during the transition of NAFL to NASH and liver failure.
Keywords: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), steatosis, inflammation, liver injury, fibrosis, fatty liver, metabolism, AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), inflammation, liver injury, fibrosis, metabolism
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major complication of metabolic dysfunction, usually a complication of obesity. NAFLD is an umbrella term describing two stages of chronic fatty liver diseases: NAFL (nonalcoholic fatty liver) and NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). NAFL is characterized by hepatic steatosis, which can be reversed simply by reduced caloric intake and exercise. Advanced stage NASH is characterized by steatosis with hepatic inflammation and liver injury, often accompanied by pericellular fibrosis (1). Although NASH is potentially reversible with diet and exercise, there is no FDA-approved medication to treat this devastating disease. NASH frequently progresses to cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (1–3). The number of individuals with NAFLD in the United States is expected to increase from 83.1 million in 2015 to 100.9 million in 2030, whereas severe cases with advanced fibrosis are anticipated to increase by more than 100% (4).
Metabolic syndrome substantially increases the risk of NASH (5). The occurrence of NAFLD is predominantly associated with obesity and insulin resistance (6), whereas the incidence of NASH strongly correlates with central obesity, defined by the waist/hip ratio (7). Type 2 diabetes represents an independent pathogenic factor for NASH (8, 9). Most individuals with NAFLD exhibit dyslipidemia, including hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia (8, 9). Moreover, diverticulosis and overgrowth of the intestinal microbiome have been identified in human NASH. NASH-related liver injury and fibrosis might result from exposure to intestine-derived bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharide (10). In addition, NAFLD and NASH can also result from a diverse array of pharmacotherapies, including glucocorticoids, tamoxifen, and methotrexate (8, 9) and long-term antiretroviral therapy for HIV (8).
The precise pathogenic mechanisms that give rise to NASH remain unclear. The “two-hit model” proposed that ectopic lipid storage caused by high-fat diet, obesity, and insulin resistance primes hepatocytes for a second insult inducing hepatic inflammation, liver injury, and fibrogenesis, which in turn promotes the progression from NAFL to NASH and cirrhosis (11, 12). However, it is now clear that multiple pathogenic factors may act in parallel and synergistically. A “multiple-hit model” proposes that multiple pathogenic factors act together to induce NAFLD, including but not limited to insulin resistance, inflammation, lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, oxidative stress, genetic determinants, and epigenetic factors (12).
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important energy sensor that regulates metabolic homeostasis. The activity of AMPK is inhibited by overnutrition during obesity and NAFLD (13–18). A recent study demonstrated that although the loss of AMPK activity does not affect hepatic lipid accumulation, it substantially exacerbates liver injury and hepatic fibrosis (17, 19), both of which could promote the transition from NASH to cirrhosis and HCC. Moreover, reactivation of AMPK improves symptoms of NASH and therapeutically improves liver injury (17, 19–21). We review here the regulation of AMPK activity during the pathophysiology of NAFL and the roles of the protein kinase in the regulation of NASH development.
AMPK
AMPK is a heterotrimeric serine/threonine kinase comprised of three subunits: the α catalytic subunit and the β and γ regulatory subunits. In mammalian cells, the AMPK α subunit has two isoforms, α1 and α2, encoded by the Prkaa1 and Prkaa2 genes. The β subunit has β1 and β2 isoforms, encoded by the Prkab1 and Prkab2 genes. The γ subunit includes three isoforms, γ1, γ2, and γ3, encoded by Prkag1, Prkag2, and Prkag3. These isoforms have the potential to form 12 different heterotrimeric complexes (15, 22). Although it remains uncertain whether there are functional differences among these isoforms, previous studies have reported different tissue distribution, regulation, subcellular localization, and functions for these complexes (23–25). The γ2 and γ3 isoforms possess unique N-terminal regions that may determine the subcellular localization of the holoenzyme (26).
The activity of AMPK is regulated by multiple factors through modulation of different subunits. The phosphorylation of Thr172 within the catalytic domain of the α subunit is required for the activation of AMPK (27, 28). Three upstream kinases, liver kinase B1 (LKB1), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase β (CaMKKβ), and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), have been shown to phosphorylate residue Thr172 (15, 29–34). Moreover, sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), an NAD+-dependent deacetylase, deacetylates LKB1 to induce its cytosolic localization and thus increases LKB1-dependent AMPK phosphorylation (35, 36). Another study showed that the Src family kinase Fyn phosphorylates LKB1 on Tyr265 and Tyr365 to increase LKB1 cytosolic localization and AMPK phosphorylation (37). Upon elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, CaMKKβ directly phosphorylates AMPK on Thr172 to increase its activity (29, 30, 33). Although the mechanism by which TAK1 activates AMPK is still unclear, several studies have demonstrated that the deletion of TAK1 inhibits starvation, metformin, and AICAR-induced AMPK activation (31, 34, 38).
As an important energy sensor, AMPK is allosterically activated by AMP (and ADP to a lesser extent), which binds to the γ subunit, and is repressed by ATP (22, 39). The interaction between AMP and the γ subunit leads to a conformational change, which protects Thr172 from dephosphorylation (40–42). Consequently, AMPK senses a high AMP/ATP ratio and responds by increasing lipid oxidation and mitochondrial biogenesis, while reducing lipogenesis and glycogenesis, to increase intracellular ATP levels (43, 44). In addition to ATP, phosphocreatine also allosterically inhibits AMPK activity (45). This finding is consistent with the energy-sensing roles of AMPK.
AMPK activity is controlled by nutrients, including lipids, amino acids, and carbohydrates. High-fat diet feeding reduces AMPK expression and phosphorylation in skeletal muscle, heart, liver, adipose tissue, aortic endothelium, and hypothalamus (18, 46–52). One study suggested that palmitate represses AMPK activity via the ceramide-dependent activation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). High-fat diets rich in palmitate inhibit AMPK activation in vivo (53). The increase of cardiac lipid content in Zucker rats and ob/ob mice results in the attenuation of AMPK activation. In cultured cardiomyocytes, fatty acids up-regulate the expression of Ppm1a (protein phosphatase 2C, PP2C) to inhibit AMPK, representing a feed-forward effect of lipid overload to promote energy storage (48). Excess amino acids have also been demonstrated to suppress AMPK activity (54, 55). High-protein diet or increased protein intake reduces AMPK phosphorylation while increasing mTOR phosphorylation in the hypothalamus and liver. An elevated level of amino acids, especially leucine, results in a decrease of the AMP/ATP ratio and thus represses AMPK activation (56, 57). The AMPKβ subunit also contains a conserved glycogen-binding domain. Glycogen, particularly when in a highly branched state, inhibits AMPK activity. Branched oligosaccharides with a single α1–6 branch allosterically inhibit AMPK phosphorylation by upstream kinases (58). Furthermore, recent studies demonstrated that AMPK activity is modulated by glucose levels. Mechanistically, aldolase senses the glycolytic intermediate fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, and interacts with v-ATPase on the lysosomal surface. Without glucose, the absence of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate causes an altered interaction between aldolase and v-ATPase, which leads to the formation of an AMPK activation complex containing v-ATPase, LKB1, AMPK, AXIN, and Regulator, thus promoting AMPKα Thr172 phosphorylation. The presence of glucose disrupts this complex and thus prevents AMPK activation (59).
Hormones and cytokines also modulate AMPK activity in physiological or pathological conditions. Insulin markedly reduces the activity of AMPK, both by increasing glucose uptake and oxidation and through Akt-mediated phosphorylation of AMPKα Ser485/491. These phosphorylation events inhibit the activity of the enzyme, leading to a conformational change that exposes the activating Thr172 phosphorylation site within the kinase domain in the α subunit. As a result, protein phosphatases, such as PP2A, dephosphorylate Thr172 to deactivate AMPK (60). Proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), have also been shown to inhibit AMPK activity. TNFα induces the expression of Ppm1a (PP2C), which dephosphorylates Thr172 to deactivate AMPK in skeletal muscle. Consequently, TNFα reduces ACC phosphorylation and represses fatty acid oxidation (14). Furthermore, TNFα activates TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) in adipocytes. TBK1 phosphorylates Ser459 and Ser476 residues in the α subunit to inhibit AMPK activity (18). Thus, AMPK activity is regulated by energy status, nutrient availability, and hormone/cytokine levels via various mechanisms, implicating its essential roles in monitoring metabolic processes (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
The regulation and function of AMPK
AMPK and NAFLD
Several studies have reported a strong association between the reduction of AMPK activity and the incidence of metabolic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD (13). AMPK activity is inhibited in both obese rodents and human subjects, mainly attributable to the excess calorie intake and/or lack of exercise as well as increased inflammation (13–16, 18, 52). Hepatic AMPK activity is substantially attenuated in both NAFL and NASH (17, 19, 61). Although the roles of AMPK repression in the pathogenesis of these states remains uncertain, both pharmacological and genetic activation of AMPK in the liver exhibit beneficial effects on multiple aspects of NAFLD (17, 20, 62, 63).
Hepatic steatosis
Ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver causes hepatic steatosis, which is tightly associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes. The amount of hepatic lipid content is predominantly regulated by four major pathways: de novo lipogenesis, fatty acid uptake, lipid oxidation, and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion. De novo lipogenesis converts acetyl-CoA to fatty acids. The rate of de novo lipogenesis is determined by two key enzymes: acetyl-CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase (FAS). ACC catalyzes the carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to generate malonyl-CoA, whereas FAS uses acetyl-CoA or malonyl-CoA to synthesize fatty acids. Esterification catalyzed by glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases, acylglycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases, and diacylglycerol acyltransferases further converts fatty acids to triglycerides for storage (64). The increase of de novo lipogenesis and esterification results in hepatic steatosis. Activation of AMPK inhibits ACC via direct phosphorylation, reducing overall hepatic lipid storage, as seen in a phase 2 clinical trial (65). Hepatic lipid accumulation can also result from fatty acid uptake and subsequent esterification into triglyceride. Hepatic lipid accumulation increases as a function of high levels of serum-free fatty acids, which are determined by the rates of lipolysis in adipose tissue. In this regard, the ability of AMPK activation to improve systemic insulin sensitivity could indirectly lower lipolysis, thus reducing free fatty acid levels and fatty acid re-esterification in liver (66, 67).
De novo lipogenesis and fatty acid uptake are offset by lipid oxidation, the major catabolic pathway that resolves hepatic lipid storage. β-Oxidation converts fatty acids to acetyl-CoA. The rate-limiting step is catalyzed by carnitine palmitoyltransferases (CPTs), which transport cytosolic acyl-CoA into mitochondria. Acetyl-CoA generated from this process can enter the TCA cycle and then be utilized by mitochondria to produce ATP or heat. Thus, hepatic triglycerides and fatty acids levels are also tightly regulated by mitochondrial number and functions. Finally, hepatic lipid content is also regulated by VLDL packaging and secretion. VLDL is the major circulating vesicle that carries triglycerides from the liver to peripheral tissues (64).
The role of AMPK in hepatic lipid metabolism remains controversial. AMPK deletion does not dramatically affect hepatic steatosis under obesogenic conditions, although activation of AMPK by A-769662 reduced hepatic lipid content in high-fat-diet–induced NAFL (19). Mechanistically, AMPK inhibits de novo lipogenesis via directly phosphorylating ACC1 Ser79 and ACC2 Ser212 to repress the activity of the enzyme (19). The inhibition of ACC reduces malonyl-CoA, which is an allosteric inhibitor of CPT1 (68). Therefore, AMPK activation leads to increased fatty acid oxidation. In addition, sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs) regulate both triglyceride and cholesterol synthesis. Maturation and activation of SREBP-1c induce the expression of Acc and Fasn to increase de novo lipogenesis. Activation of SREBP-2 up-regulates the expression of cholesterol synthesis genes, including HMG-CoA reductase (Hmgcr), HMG-CoA synthase (Hmgcs), farnesyl diphosphate synthase (Fdps), and squalene synthase (Sqs) (69). AMPK directly phosphorylates and inhibits both SREBP-1 and -2 to reduce de novo lipogenesis and cholesterol synthesis in the liver (70). In addition, mTOR increases lipogenesis by promoting transcription and maturation of SREBPs (69). AMPK has been shown to phosphorylate both TSC2 and Raptor to inhibit mTORC1 activity (71–73). Consequently, activation of AMPK inhibits triglyceride and cholesterol synthesis to reduce hepatic steatosis.
The levels of circulating fatty acids are regulated by lipolysis in adipose tissue. Free fatty acids generated by adipocytes are burned through β-oxidation and respiration or secreted into the circulation. Enhanced lipolysis in adipose tissue increases circulating fatty acids, which in turn leads to hepatic fatty acid uptake and promotes steatosis (74, 75). On the other hand, increased fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial respiration in adipose tissue reduces circulating fatty acids and alleviates hepatic steatosis (76). As a master regulator of metabolism, AMPK directly phosphorylates and activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1α (PGC1α) to induce mitochondrial biogenesis, hence increasing mitochondrial number (77, 78). In addition, AMPK induces mitophagy via phosphorylating and activating Unc-51–like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1) to clear damaged mitochondria and maintain mitochondrial homeostasis in adipose tissue (79, 80). Although it is still controversial, several studies indicated that AMPK directly phosphorylates hormone-sensitive lipase on Ser565 to inhibit lipolysis in adipocytes (66, 81, 82). In summary, the activation of AMPK attenuates hepatic steatosis by modulating de novo lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and fatty acid release from adipose tissue (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
The regulation of hepatic steatosis by AMPK. Activation of AMPK inhibits de novo lipogenesis while promoting fatty acid oxidation (β-oxidation) in the livers. In addition, AMPK activation reduces free fatty acid release from adipose tissue to prevent hepatic steatosis.
Hepatic inflammation
Inflammation is a hallmark for the progression from NAFL to NASH. The recruitment of immune cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and T cells, and the production of immune cell–derived cytokines, chemokines, and eicosanoids lead to hepatic inflammation (83). The increased number of recruited macrophages is currently used as a histological marker to determine liver inflammation. During the development of NASH, bone marrow–derived macrophages infiltrate into liver and work together with Kupffer cells to promote inflammation. Kupffer cells are yok sac–derived, self-renewable liver-resident macrophages that localize within hepatic sinusoids (84). A recent study using single-cell RNA-Seq and lineage tracing has revealed that during NASH, resident Kupffer cell partially lose their cell identity and express genes that promote hepatocyte death. Meanwhile, increased bone marrow–derived macrophages acquire some Kupffer cell features and further enhance inflammation (85). Under inflammatory conditions during NASH, Kupffer cells can be induced to proliferate and differentiate into different subpopulations (86). Depending on the stimulating signals, both recruited macrophages and Kupffer cells undergo differentiation into M1- or M2-like macrophages (87). In response to proinflammatory stimuli, M1-like macrophages produce various cytokines, including TNFα and IL1β, to induce hepatocellular death and liver injury. In contrast, upon stimulation from signals inducing M2-like differentiation, macrophages secret cytokines like TGFβ to activate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and thus promote hepatic fibrosis (88–90). Therefore, hepatic inflammation plays a central role in the progression of NAFLD.
Oxidative stress, ER stress, lipotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction are among other pathogenic factors that trigger inflammation (83). Under conditions of oxidative stress, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by mitochondria and NADPH oxidase is substantially up-regulated in the liver (91). The macrophage is a major source of ROS generated by NADPH oxidase (92, 93). Danger-associated molecular patterns are known to induce ROS formation in macrophages (94). ROS activates the NOD–, LRR–, and pyrin domain–containing protein-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome to induce inflammation. Blockage of the NLRP3 inflammasome attenuates hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in NASH (95). Oxidative stress promotes lipid peroxidation in the liver. The products of this nonenzymatic process, such as oxidized phospholipids and 4-hydroxynonenal, further enhance ROS generation to form a vicious cycle (96, 97). Neutralization of oxidized phospholipids prevents mitochondrial damage and protects against amylin diet–induced NASH (96). ER stress caused by the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded protein also promotes the production of ROS by inducing Ca2+ release from the ER and thus inducing inflammation (98). Dietary factors, such as fructose, free fatty acids, and cholesterol, are external pathogenic factors triggering inflammation. Fructose is known to induce proinflammatory gene expression and impair β-oxidation in the liver (99–102). The amylin diet, containing fructose, is widely used to establish preclinical NASH mouse models. Elevated levels of saturated fatty acids induce the accumulation of unfolded protein and ER stress (103). High free cholesterol has been associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, and oxidative stress (104, 105), all of which contribute to the development of hepatic inflammation.
Previous studies demonstrated that activation of AMPK decreases the expression of proinflammatory mediators and attenuates inflammation in different conditions (106–108). Liver-specific expression of constitutively active AMPK reduces the expression of inflammatory genes (20). The chemokine CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, MCP-1) is an essential player in the recruitment of macrophages. The expression of Ccl2 is induced by the activation of multiple proinflammatory signaling pathways, including NFκB- and JNK-mediated pathways (109, 110). AMPK activation by AICAR or by the expression of constitutively active AMPK largely alleviates palmitate- and TNFα-induced NFκB activation (111). Mechanistically, AMPK inhibits the nuclear localization of NFκB to repress the expression of NFκB target genes. Moreover, AMPK activation increases NAD+ levels, leading to the activation of SIRT1. SIRT1 deacetylates the NFκB RelA/p65 subunit at Lys310 to attenuate its transactivation activity (112). Our recent work found that AMPK phosphorylates ULK1 to induce TBK1 phosphorylation. TBK1, in turn, phosphorylates NFκB-inducing kinase (NIK) to induce its degradation. Consequently, AMPK activation leads to NIK degradation, resulting in attenuation of the atypical NFκB pathway, which is aberrantly activated in NAFLD (18, 113). Furthermore, AMPK activation by A-769662 inhibits IL-1β–induced JNK activation (114). As a result, AMPK inhibits proinflammatory signaling pathways to reduce Ccl2 expression (18, 115). In addition, other studies have found that multiple downstream transcription factors, including FoxO family proteins and PGC1α, could be involved in the anti-inflammatory effects of AMPK through regulating gene expression (108).
In addition to inhibiting proinflammatory signaling, AMPK may ameliorate inflammation via its anti-oxidative functions. ROS plays critical roles in the development of hepatic inflammation. AMPK activation attenuates cytosolic ROS production by down-regulating the expression of NAD(P)H oxidase genes and reducing mitochondrial ROS through an increase in PGC1α target gene expression (116–119). Moreover, the activation of AMPK up-regulates the expression of Sod2 (superoxide dismutase 2) and Cat (catalase) to alleviate oxidative stress (120). The reduction of ROS in turn ameliorates NLRP3 activation to reduce inflammation (121). Studies have demonstrated that antioxidants, such as coenzyme Q10 and γ-tocotrienol, activate AMPK and inhibit NLRP3 activation (122, 123). An AMPK-FOXO3 pathway has been shown to induce the expression of thioredoxin (Trx) (124). Trx binds to the thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip), blocking the interaction between Txnip and NLRP3. Consequently, AMPK inhibits the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome to prevent hepatic inflammation (108, 125).
Liver injury
In normal liver, hepatocyte apoptosis maintains liver homeostasis, with a strict equilibrium between the loss and replacement of hepatocytes (110, 126). However, under pathological conditions, such as viral infection, alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and physical injury, extensive hepatocellular death leads to sustained liver injury, which is responsible for the enhanced scarring, bridging fibrosis, and subsequent development of cirrhosis (127–129). Moreover, hepatocellular death has been recognized as a major contributor to the progression to hepatocellular carcinoma (130). Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms of hepatocellular death is crucial for the treatment of liver diseases (131). Currently, hepatocellular death, reflected by increased serum aminotransferase levels, is the most widely used and sensitive parameter to screen for and monitor individuals with liver disease (110, 132). Evaluation of liver injury drives therapeutic decisions and has prognostic value for NASH.
Previous studies suggested that multiple types of cell death may contribute to liver injury in NASH. Although apoptosis plays a vital role to maintain homeostasis in healthy liver, elevated apoptotic stimuli produces extensive apoptosis, resulting in liver injury (126, 127). Whereas early findings suggested that the extensive apoptosis is responsible for NASH-associated liver damage, recent work suggests that other types of cell death also contribute to the pathogenesis of NASH. Necroptosis is a programmed form of inflammatory cell death that is mediated by the activation of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 (RIPK3). Activated RIPK3 phosphorylates mixed kinase domain–like protein, which forms pores in the membrane to cause rupture (133, 134). The expression of Ripk3 is induced in a methionine- and choline-deficient diet (MCD)-induced NASH mouse model. Knockout of Ripk3 ameliorates liver injury in these mice (135). Ferroptosis is a type of programmed cell death dependent on iron, producing lipid peroxidation-mediated cell death in NASH (136). Although it remains unclear whether pyroptosis, the highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death, occurs during NASH, the pyroptotic effector gasdermin D (GSDMD) and its pyroptosis-inducing fragment GSDMD-N are increased in human NASH. GSDMD deficiency alleviates lipogenesis and inflammation in MCD-induced NASH model (137).
In the pathogenesis of NASH, these pathogenic factors, including but not limited to oxidative stress, ER stress, lipotoxicity, and mitochondrial dysfunction, all activate signaling that has the capacity to mediate hepatocellular death (138). However, the crucial underlying mechanism for the regulation of hepatocellular death and liver injury during the transition from NAFL to NASH remains unclear. Our recent study found that normal AMPK activity is required to prevent hepatocellular death and liver damage. Liver-specific knockout of AMPKα1/α2 exaggerates liver injury in the choline-deficient high-fat diet (CD-HFD: 60% fat, 0.1% methionine, l-amino acid, no added choline)–induced NASH model. During the development of NASH, caspase-mediated apoptotic signaling pathways are induced in hepatocytes. The cleavage and activation of caspase-6 mediate a feed-forward loop to sustain the activation of apoptotic pathways and thus cause hepatocellular death in NASH. AMPK directly phosphorylates procaspase-6 to inhibit its cleavage and activation and control cell death. The repression of AMPK during obesity and NAFLD unleashes caspase-6 to prime hepatocyte for apoptosis. We further demonstrated that activation of AMPK by A-769662 therapeutically improves liver damage even after NASH onset (17).
Hepatic fibrosis
Hepatic fibrosis is a key feature used to determine severity of NASH. Progressive liver fibrosis frequently results in the progression from NASH to cirrhosis. Fibrosis is a wound-healing process that forms excess fibrous connective tissues to replace normal parenchymal tissues. Normal or mild fibrosis during injury is necessary for tissue repair. Extensive or chronic fibrosis results in the excessive accumulation of collagen and fibers in the extracellular space (62, 128). Hepatic fibrosis is induced upon activation of pathogenic pathways, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and liver injury. Whereas inflammation induces the pericellular fibrosis typically observed in the early stages of NASH, scarring after sustained liver injury leads to progressive fibrosis and subsequent development of cirrhosis (62, 128). The aggravation of liver damage worsens hepatic fibrosis even without changes in hepatic steatosis or inflammation (17). At advanced stages of hepatic fibrosis, the disruption of normal liver architecture and functions possibly results in the liver-associated death (128, 139). Therefore, resolving hepatic fibrosis and restoring liver functions are the ultimate goals for NASH treatment (1, 128, 139).
In chronic liver diseases, HSCs are direct mediators of fibrosis. Growth factors and inflammatory cytokines produced from other cell types, such as TGFβ from macrophages and platelet-derived growth factor from endothelial cells, cause overproliferation and transdifferentiation of HSCs. Upon activation, HSCs transdifferentiate into myofibroblasts, which produce an excessive amount of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (62, 140). Consequently, the accumulation of ECM and fibers disturbs hepatic homeostasis and further promotes the progression to cirrhosis or even HCC (141).
The activation of AMPK has been demonstrated to improve liver injury and attenuate hepatic fibrosis in different NASH models. AMPK activation by A-769662 improves liver injury and alleviates fibrosis in CD-HFD–induced NASH (17). Low doses of sorafenib, the first-line treatment for advanced HCC, activates AMPK and attenuates NASH-associated fibrosis in experimental mouse and monkey models (21). The injection of CCl4 induces liver injury and hepatic fibrosis in a lipid-independent manner. In this mouse model, AMPK activation ameliorates fibrogenesis via inhibiting HSC proliferation and down-regulating the expression of fibrogenic genes, including Nox4, Tgfb, and Acta2 (142, 143). Mechanistic studies further demonstrated that CCl4 induces strong oxidative stress and hepatic accumulation of ROS, which in turn promotes hepatocellular death and liver fibrosis. The activation of AMPK prevents ROS production and HSCs activation and thus protects against liver injury and fibrosis (143–145). Furthermore, the fibrogenic cytokine TGFβ is mainly derived from macrophages and induces HSC activation during the fibrogenic process. Multiple studies demonstrated that the induction of AMPK activity represses TGFβ-induced expression of fibrogenic genes in HSCs (62, 146–149). Both metformin and AICAR down-regulate the expression of Col1a and Acta2 (α-smooth muscle actin) in TGFβ-treated HSCs (150, 151). AMPK disrupts the interaction between Smad3 and its transcriptional coactivator p300 and induces proteasomal degradation of p300 to reduce fibrogenic genes expression in HSCs (151). Additionally, the activation of AMPK by adiponectin induces nitric oxide production to inhibit HSC proliferation and promote HSC apoptosis (149). AMPK activation by macrophage migration–inhibitory factor represses HSC migration and prevents hepatic fibrosis (62, 152). In summary, the activation of AMPK ameliorates hepatic fibrosis through multiple mechanisms, including reducing fibrogenic stimuli, preventing HSC activation/proliferation/migration and inhibiting expression of fibrogenic genes.
Concluding remarks
AMPK is a critical energy sensor that regulates metabolic homeostasis. An increasing body of evidence has demonstrated that AMPK activity is repressed during metabolic disorders, including obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD. The inhibition of AMPK connects lipid dysregulation to inflammation, liver injury, and fibrosis in NAFLD (Fig. 3). Pharmacological activation of AMPK improves NASH in both murine and simian models (21). AMPK activators, such as A-769662, PF-739, or metformin, ameliorate symptoms of NASH-hepatic steatosis, inflammation, liver injury, and fibrosis via different mechanisms. However, global activation of AMPK by MK-8722 results in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, possibly due to the induction of cardiac glycogen synthesis (153). Further investigation is needed to determine whether cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is a general effect for systemic AMPK activation or a side effect that is specific for MK-8722. In the event that increased AMPK activity results in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, liver-specific activation of AMPK by liver cell–targeted drug delivery might be of great interest for the treatment of NASH.
Figure 3.
The effects of AMPK on hepatic steatosis, inflammation, liver injury, and fibrosis in NASH.
Funding and additional information—This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30DK063491, R01DK076906, R01DK117551, R01DK122804, and R01DK125820 (to A. R. S.) and National Institutes of Health Grant K99HL143277 (to P. Z.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of interest—A. R. S. and P. Z. are named inventors of patent application related to targeting the AMPK-caspase-6 axis for NASH treatment. A. R. S. is a founder of Elgia Therapeutics.
- NAFLD
- nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
- NAFL
- nonalcoholic fatty liver
- NASH
- nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
- FDA
- Food and Drug Administration
- HCC
- hepatocellular carcinoma
- ER
- endoplasmic reticulum
- AMPK
- AMP-activated protein kinase
- TNF
- tumor necrosis factor
- VLDL
- very low-density lipoprotein
- FAS
- fatty acid synthase
- CPT
- carnitine palmitoyltransferase
- SREBP
- sterol regulatory element–binding protein
- mTOR
- mechanistic target of rapamycin
- HSC
- hepatic stellate cell
- ROS
- reactive oxygen species
- JNK
- c-Jun N-terminal kinase
- AICAR
- 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide
- NIK
- NFκB-inducing kinase
- MCD
- methionine- and choline-deficient diet
- GSDMD
- gasdermin D
- CD-HFD
- choline-deficient high-fat diet
- TGF
- transforming growth factor
- ECM
- extracellular matrix.
References
- 1. Friedman S. L., Neuschwander-Tetri B. A., Rinella M., and Sanyal A. J. (2018) Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 24, 908–922 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rinella M. E., and Sanyal A. J. (2016) Management of NAFLD: a stage-based approach. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 196–205 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lindenmeyer C. C., and McCullough A. J. (2018) The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an evolving view. Clin. Liver Dis. 22, 11–21 10.1016/j.cld.2017.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Estes C., Razavi H., Loomba R., Younossi Z., and Sanyal A. J. (2018) Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 67, 123–133 10.1002/hep.29466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Marchesini G., Bugianesi E., Forlani G., Cerrelli F., Lenzi M., Manini R., Natale S., Vanni E., Villanova N., Melchionda N., and Rizzetto M. (2003) Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology 37, 917–923 10.1053/jhep.2003.50161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Loomba R., and Sanyal A. J. (2013) The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 686–690 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Farrell G. C., and Larter C. Z. (2006) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology 43, S99–S112 10.1002/hep.20973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kopec K. L., and Burns D. (2011) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a review of the spectrum of disease, diagnosis, and therapy. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 26, 565–576 10.1177/0884533611419668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Reid A. E. (2001) Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 121, 710–723 10.1053/gast.2001.27126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shanab A. A., Scully P., Crosbie O., Buckley M., O'Mahony L., Shanahan F., Gazareen S., Murphy E., and Quigley E. M. M. (2011) Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association with toll-like receptor 4 expression and plasma levels of interleukin 8. Dig. Dis. Sci. 56, 1524–1534 10.1007/s10620-010-1447-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Peverill W., Powell L. W., and Skoien R. (2014) Evolving concepts in the pathogenesis of NASH: beyond steatosis and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 8591–8638 10.3390/ijms15058591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Buzzetti E., Pinzani M., and Tsochatzis E. A. (2016) The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism 65, 1038–1048 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ruderman N., and Prentki M. (2004) AMP kinase and malonyl-CoA: targets for therapy of the metabolic syndrome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 340–351 10.1038/nrd1344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Steinberg G. R., Michell B. J., van Denderen B. J., Watt M. J., Carey A. L., Fam B. C., Andrikopoulos S., Proietto J., Görgün C. Z., Carling D., Hotamisligil G. S., Febbraio M. A., Kay T. W., and Kemp B. E. (2006) Tumor necrosis factor α-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance involves suppression of AMP-kinase signaling. Cell Metab. 4, 465–474 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Viollet B., Horman S., Leclerc J., Lantier L., Foretz M., Billaud M., Giri S., and Andreelli F. (2010) AMPK inhibition in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 45, 276–295 10.3109/10409238.2010.488215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xu X. J., Gauthier M. S., Hess D. T., Apovian C. M., Cacicedo J. M., Gokce N., Farb M., Valentine R. J., and Ruderman N. B. (2012) Insulin sensitive and resistant obesity in humans: AMPK activity, oxidative stress, and depot-specific changes in gene expression in adipose tissue. J. Lipid Res. 53, 792–801 10.1194/jlr.P022905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhao P., Sun X., Chaggan C., Liao Z., In Wong K., He F., Singh S., Loomba R., Karin M., Witztum J. L., and Saltiel A. R. (2020) An AMPK-caspase-6 axis controls liver damage in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Science 367, 652–660 10.1126/science.aay0542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhao P., Wong K. I., Sun X. L., Reilly S. M., Uhm M., Liao Z. J., Skorobogatko Y., and Saltiel A. R. (2018) TBK1 at the crossroads of inflammation and energy homeostasis in adipose tissue. Cell 172, 731–743 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Boudaba N., Marion A., Huet C., Pierre R., Viollet B., and Foretz M. (2018) AMPK re-activation suppresses hepatic steatosis but its downregulation does not promote fatty liver development. Ebiomedicine 28, 194–209 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Garcia D., Hellberg K., Chaix A., Wallace M., Herzig S., Badur M. G., Lin T., Shokhirev M. N., Pinto A. F. M., Ross D. S., Saghatelian A., Panda S., Dow L. E., Metallo C. M., and Shaw R. J. (2019) Genetic liver-specific AMPK activation protects against diet-induced obesity and NAFLD. Cell Rep. 26, 192–208.e6 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Jian C., Fu J., Cheng X., Shen L. J., Ji Y. X., Wang X., Pan S., Tian H., Tian S., Liao R., Song K., Wang H. P., Zhang X., Wang Y., Huang Z., et al. (2020) Low-dose sorafenib acts as a mitochondrial uncoupler and ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 31, 892–908.e11 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mihaylova M. M., and Shaw R. J. (2011) The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1016–1023 10.1038/ncb2329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cheung P. C., Salt I. P., Davies S. P., Hardie D. G., and Carling D. (2000) Characterization of AMP-activated protein kinase γ-subunit isoforms and their role in AMP binding. Biochem. J. 346, 659–669 10.1042/0264-6021:3460659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cokorinos E. C., Delmore J., Reyes A. R., Albuquerque B., Kjobsted R., Jorgensen N. O., Tran J. L., Jatkar A., Cialdea K., Esquejo R. M., Meissen J., Calabrese M. F., Cordes J., Moccia R., Tess D., et al. (2017) Activation of skeletal muscle AMPK promotes glucose disposal and glucose lowering in non-human primates and mice. Cell Metab. 25, 1147–1159.e10 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Salt I., Celler J. W., Hawley S. A., Prescott A., Woods A., Carling D., and Hardie D. G. (1998) AMP-activated protein kinase: greater AMP dependence, and preferential nuclear localization, of complexes containing the α2 isoform. Biochem. J. 334, 177–187 10.1042/bj3340177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pinter K., Grignani R. T., Watkins H., and Redwood C. (2013) Localisation of AMPK γ subunits in cardiac and skeletal muscles. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 34, 369–378 10.1007/s10974-013-9359-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hawley S. A., Davison M., Woods A., Davies S. P., Beri R. K., Carling D., and Hardie D. G. (1996) Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27879–27887 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mitchelhill K. I., Michell B. J., House C. M., Stapleton D., Dyck J., Gamble J., Ullrich C., Witters L. A., and Kemp B. E. (1997) Posttranslational modifications of the 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase β1 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24475–24479 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hawley S. A., Pan D. A., Mustard K. J., Ross L., Bain J., Edelman A. M., Frenguelli B. G., and Hardie D. G. (2005) Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-β is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab. 2, 9–19 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hurley R. L., Anderson K. A., Franzone J. M., Kemp B. E., Means A. R., and Witters L. A. (2005) The Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinases are AMP-activated protein kinase kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 29060–29066 10.1074/jbc.M503824200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Momcilovic M., Hong S. P., and Carlson M. (2006) Mammalian TAK1 activates Snf1 protein kinase in yeast and phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25336–25343 10.1074/jbc.M604399200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shaw R. J., Kosmatka M., Bardeesy N., Hurley R. L., Witters L. A., DePinho R. A., and Cantley L. C. (2004) The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 3329–3335 10.1073/pnas.0308061100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Woods A., Dickerson K., Heath R., Hong S. P., Momcilovic M., Johnstone S. R., Carlson M., and Carling D. (2005) Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta acts upstream of AMP-activated protein kinase in mammalian cells. Cell Metab. 2, 21–33 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Xie M., Zhang D., Dyck J. R., Li Y., Zhang H., Morishima M., Mann D. L., Taffet G. E., Baldini A., Khoury D. S., and Schneider M. D. (2006) A pivotal role for endogenous TGF-β-activated kinase-1 in the LKB1/AMP-activated protein kinase energy-sensor pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 17378–17383 10.1073/pnas.0604708103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lan F., Cacicedo J. M., Ruderman N., and Ido Y. (2008) SIRT1 modulation of the acetylation status, cytosolic localization, and activity of LKB1: possible role in AMP-activated protein kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 27628–27635 10.1074/jbc.M805711200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Howitz K. T., Bitterman K. J., Cohen H. Y., Lamming D. W., Lavu S., Wood J. G., Zipkin R. E., Chung P., Kisielewski A., Zhang L. L., Scherer B., and Sinclair D. A. (2003) Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature 425, 191–196 10.1038/nature01960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yamada E., Pessin J. E., Kurland I. J., Schwartz G. J., and Bastie C. C. (2010) Fyn-dependent regulation of energy expenditure and body weight is mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of LKB1. Cell Metab. 11, 113–124 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Inokuchi-Shimizu S., Park E. J., Roh Y. S., Yang L., Zhang B., Song J., Liang S., Pimienta M., Taniguchi K., Wu X., Asahina K., Lagakos W., Mackey M. R., Akira S., Ellisman M. H., et al. (2014) TAK1-mediated autophagy and fatty acid oxidation prevent hepatosteatosis and tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 3566–3578 10.1172/JCI74068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hardie D. G., Ross F. A., and Hawley S. A. (2012) AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 251–262 10.1038/nrm3311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Suter M., Riek U., Tuerk R., Schlattner U., Wallimann T., and Neumann D. (2006) Dissecting the role of 5'-AMP for allosteric stimulation, activation, and deactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 32207–32216 10.1074/jbc.M606357200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sanders M. J., Grondin P. O., Hegarty B. D., Snowden M. A., and Carling D. (2007) Investigating the mechanism for AMP activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Biochem. J. 403, 139–148 10.1042/BJ20061520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Riek U., Scholz R., Konarev P., Rufer A., Suter M., Nazabal A., Ringler P., Chami M., Müller S. A., Neumann D., Forstner M., Hennig M., Zenobi R., Engel A., Svergun D., et al. (2008) Structural properties of AMP-activated protein kinase: dimerization, molecular shape, and changes upon ligand binding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18331–18343 10.1074/jbc.M708379200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Daval M., Foufelle F., and Ferré P. (2006) Functions of AMP-activated protein kinase in adipose tissue. J. Physiol. 574, 55–62 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.111484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hardie D. G. (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase: an energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function. Genes Dev. 25, 1895–1908 10.1101/gad.17420111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ponticos M., Lu Q. L., Morgan J. E., Hardie D. G., Partridge T. A., and Carling D. (1998) Dual regulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase provides a novel mechanism for the control of creatine kinase in skeletal muscle. EMBO J. 17, 1688–1699 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Muse E. D., Obici S., Bhanot S., Monia B. P., McKay R. A., Rajala M. W., Scherer P. E., and Rossetti L. (2004) Role of resistin in diet-induced hepatic insulin resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 114, 232–239 10.1172/JCI200421270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lee W. J., Lee I. K., Kim H. S., Kim Y. M., Koh E. H., Won J. C., Han S. M., Kim M. S., Jo I., Oh G. T., Park I. S., Youn J. H., Park S. W., Lee K. U., and Park J. Y. (2005) α-Lipoic acid prevents endothelial dysfunction in obese rats via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 2488–2494 10.1161/01.ATV.0000190667.33224.4c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wang M. Y., and Unger R. H. (2005) Role of PP2C in cardiac lipid accumulation in obese rodents and its prevention by troglitazone. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 288, E216–E221 10.1152/ajpendo.00004.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wilkes J. J., Nguyen M. T., Bandyopadhyay G. K., Nelson E., and Olefsky J. M. (2005) Topiramate treatment causes skeletal muscle insulin sensitization and increased Acrp30 secretion in high-fat-fed male Wistar rats. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 289, E1015–E1022 10.1152/ajpendo.00169.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lessard S. J., Chen Z. P., Watt M. J., Hashem M., Reid J. J., Febbraio M. A., Kemp B. E., and Hawley J. A. (2006) Chronic rosiglitazone treatment restores AMPKα2 activity in insulin-resistant rat skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 290, E251–E257 10.1152/ajpendo.00096.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Liu Y., Wan Q., Guan Q., Gao L., and Zhao J. (2006) High-fat diet feeding impairs both the expression and activity of AMPKa in rats' skeletal muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 339, 701–707 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Martin T. L., Alquier T., Asakura K., Furukawa N., Preitner F., and Kahn B. B. (2006) Diet-induced obesity alters AMP kinase activity in hypothalamus and skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 18933–18941 10.1074/jbc.M512831200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wu Y., Song P., Xu J., Zhang M., and Zou M. H. (2007) Activation of protein phosphatase 2A by palmitate inhibits AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 9777–9788 10.1074/jbc.M608310200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Leclerc I., and Rutter G. A. (2004) AMP-activated protein kinase: a new beta-cell glucose sensor?: regulation by amino acids and calcium ions. Diabetes 53, S67–74 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.S67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gleason C. E., Lu D., Witters L. A., Newgard C. B., and Birnbaum M. J. (2007) The role of AMPK and mTOR in nutrient sensing in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 10341–10351 10.1074/jbc.M610631200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Saha A. K., Xu X. J., Lawson E., Deoliveira R., Brandon A. E., Kraegen E. W., and Ruderman N. B. (2010) Downregulation of AMPK accompanies leucine- and glucose-induced increases in protein synthesis and insulin resistance in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 59, 2426–2434 10.2337/db09-1870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chotechuang N., Azzout-Marniche D., Bos C., Chaumontet C., Gausseres N., Steiler T., Gaudichon C., and Tome D. (2009) mTOR, AMPK, and GCN2 coordinate the adaptation of hepatic energy metabolic pathways in response to protein intake in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297, E1313–E1323 10.1152/ajpendo.91000.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. McBride A., Ghilagaber S., Nikolaev A., and Hardie D. G. (2009) The glycogen-binding domain on the AMPK β subunit allows the kinase to act as a glycogen sensor. Cell Metab. 9, 23–34 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Lin S. C., and Hardie D. G. (2018) AMPK: sensing glucose as well as cellular energy status. Cell Metab. 27, 299–313 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Suzuki T., Bridges D., Nakada D., Skiniotis G., Morrison S. J., Lin J. D., Saltiel A. R., and Inoki K. (2013) Inhibition of AMPK catabolic action by GSK3. Mol. Cell 50, 407–419 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Qiang X., Xu L., Zhang M., Zhang P., Wang Y., Wang Y., Zhao Z., Chen H., Liu X., and Zhang Y. (2016) Demethyleneberberine attenuates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with activation of AMPK and inhibition of oxidative stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 472, 603–609 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Liang Z., Li T., Jiang S., Xu J., Di W., Yang Z., Hu W., and Yang Y. (2017) AMPK: a novel target for treating hepatic fibrosis. Oncotarget 8, 62780–62792 10.18632/oncotarget.19376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Smith B. K., Marcinko K., Desjardins E. M., Lally J. S., Ford R. J., and Steinberg G. R. (2016) Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: role of AMPK. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 311, E730–E740 10.1152/ajpendo.00225.2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Nguyen P., Leray V., Diez M., Serisier S., Le Bloc'h J., Siliart B., and Dumon H. (2008) Liver lipid metabolism. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 92, 272–283 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00752.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Alkhouri N., Lawitz E., Noureddin M., DeFronzo R., and Shulman G. I. (2020) GS-0976 (Firsocostat): an investigational liver-directed acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) inhibitor for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 29, 135–141 10.1080/13543784.2020.1668374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Daval M., Diot-Dupuy F., Bazin R., Hainault I., Viollet B., Vaulont S., Hajduch E., Ferré P., and Foufelle F. (2005) Anti-lipolytic action of AMP-activated protein kinase in rodent adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 25250–25257 10.1074/jbc.M414222200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jeon S. M. (2016) Regulation and function of AMPK in physiology and diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 48, e245 10.1038/emm.2016.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. McGarry J. D., Takabayashi Y., and Foster D. W. (1978) The role of malonyl-CoA in the coordination of fatty acid synthesis and oxidation in isolated rat hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 253, 8294–8300 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Han J., and Wang Y. (2018) mTORC1 signaling in hepatic lipid metabolism. Protein Cell 9, 145–151 10.1007/s13238-017-0409-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Li Y., Xu S. Q., Mihaylova M. M., Zheng B., Hou X. Y., Jiang B. B., Park O., Luo Z. J., Lefai E., Shyy J. Y. J., Gao B., Wierzbicki M., Verbeuren T. J., Shaw R. J., Cohen R. A., et al. (2011) AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits SREBP activity to attenuate hepatic steatosis and atherosclerosis in diet-induced insulin-resistant mice. Cell Metab. 13, 376–388 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. González A., Hall M. N., Lin S. C., and Hardie D. G. (2020) AMPK and TOR: the yin and yang of cellular nutrient sensing and growth control. Cell Metab. 31, 472–492 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Inoki K., Zhu T., and Guan K. L. (2003) TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115, 577–590 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00929-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Gwinn D. M., Shackelford D. B., Egan D. F., Mihaylova M. M., Mery A., Vasquez D. S., Turk B. E., and Shaw R. J. (2008) AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell 30, 214–226 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Thorne A., Lofgren P., and Hoffstedt J. (2010) Increased visceral adipocyte lipolysis–a pathogenic role in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, E209–E213 10.1210/jc.2010-0520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wueest S., Item F., Lucchini F. C., Challa T. D., Muller W., Bluher M., and Konrad D. (2016) Mesenteric fat lipolysis mediates obesity-associated hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Diabetes 65, 140–148 10.2337/db15-0941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Scheja L., and Heeren J. (2016) Metabolic interplay between white, beige, brown adipocytes and the liver. J. Hepatol. 64, 1176–1186 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Cantó C., and Auwerx J. (2009) PGC-1α, SIRT1 and AMPK, an energy sensing network that controls energy expenditure. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 20, 98–105 10.1097/mol.0b013e328328d0a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Puigserver P., Wu Z., Park C. W., Graves R., Wright M., and Spiegelman B. M. (1998) A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell 92, 829–839 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Kim J., Kundu M., Viollet B., and Guan K. L. (2011) AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 132–141 10.1038/ncb2152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Mottillo E. P., Desjardins E. M., Crane J. D., Smith B. K., Green A. E., Ducommun S., Henriksen T. I., Rebalka I. A., Razi A., Sakamoto K., Scheele C., Kemp B. E., Hawke T. J., Ortega J., Granneman J. G., et al. (2016) Lack of adipocyte AMPK exacerbates insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis through brown and beige adipose tissue function. Cell Metab. 24, 118–129 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Corton J. M., Gillespie J. G., Hawley S. A., and Hardie D. G. (1995) 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside: a specific method for activating AMP-activated protein kinase in intact cells? Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 558–565 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20498.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Sullivan J. E., Brocklehurst K. J., Marley A. E., Carey F., Carling D., and Beri R. K. (1994) Inhibition of lipolysis and lipogenesis in isolated rat adipocytes with AICAR, a cell-permeable activator of AMP-activated protein kinase. FEBS Lett. 353, 33–36 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01006-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Schuster S., Cabrera D., Arrese M., and Feldstein A. E. (2018) Triggering and resolution of inflammation in NASH. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 349–364 10.1038/s41575-018-0009-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Dixon L. J., Barnes M., Tang H., Pritchard M. T., and Nagy L. E. (2013) Kupffer cells in the liver. Compr. Physiol. 3, 785–797 10.1002/cphy.c120026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Seidman J. S., Troutman T. D., Sakai M., Gola A., Spann N. J., Bennett H., Bruni C. M., Ouyang Z., Li R. Z., Sun X., Vu B. T., Pasillas M. P., Ego K. M., Gosselin D., Link V. M., et al. (2020) Niche-specific reprogramming of epigenetic landscapes drives myeloid cell diversity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Immunity 52, 1057–1074.e7 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Jenkins S. J., Ruckerl D., Cook P. C., Jones L. H., Finkelman F. D., van Rooijen N., MacDonald A. S., and Allen J. E. (2011) Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, is a signature of TH2 inflammation. Science 332, 1284–1288 10.1126/science.1204351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Wan J., Benkdane M., Teixeira-Clerc F., Bonnafous S., Louvet A., Lafdil F., Pecker F., Tran A., Gual P., Mallat A., Lotersztajn S., and Pavoine C. (2014) M2 Kupffer cells promote M1 Kupffer cell apoptosis: a protective mechanism against alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 59, 130–142 10.1002/hep.26607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Zhang F., Wang H., Wang X., Jiang G., Liu H., Zhang G., Wang H., Fang R., Bu X., Cai S., and Du J. (2016) TGF-β induces M2-like macrophage polarization via SNAIL-mediated suppression of a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Oncotarget 7, 52294–52306 10.18632/oncotarget.10561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Mosser D. M., and Edwards J. P. (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 958–969 10.1038/nri2448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Koyama Y., and Brenner D. A. (2017) Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 55–64 10.1172/JCI88881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Masarone M., Rosato V., Dallio M., Gravina A. G., Aglitti A., Loguercio C., Federico A., and Persico M. (2018) Role of oxidative stress in pathophysiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2018, 9547613 10.1155/2018/9547613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Krenkel O., and Tacke F. (2017) Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 306–321 10.1038/nri.2017.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Liang S., Ma H. Y., Zhong Z., Dhar D., Liu X., Xu J., Koyama Y., Nishio T., Karin D., Karin G., McCubbin R., Zhang C., Hu R., Yang G., Chen L., et al. (2019) NADPH oxidase 1 in liver macrophages promotes inflammation and tumor development in mice. Gastroenterology 156, 1156–1172.e6 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Chatterjee S., Rana R., Corbett J., Kadiiska M. B., Goldstein J., and Mason R. P. (2012) P2X7 receptor-NADPH oxidase axis mediates protein radical formation and Kupffer cell activation in carbon tetrachloride-mediated steatohepatitis in obese mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 52, 1666–1679 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Mridha A. R., Wree A., Robertson A. A. B., Yeh M. M., Johnson C. D., Van Rooyen D. M., Haczeyni F., Teoh N. C., Savard C., Ioannou G. N., Masters S. L., Schroder K., Cooper M. A., Feldstein A. E., and Farrell G. C. (2017) NLRP3 inflammasome blockade reduces liver inflammation and fibrosis in experimental NASH in mice. J. Hepatol. 66, 1037–1046 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Sun X., Seidman J. S., Zhao P., Troutman T. D., Spann N. J., Que X., Zhou F., Liao Z., Pasillas M., Yang X., Magida J. A., Kisseleva T., Brenner D. A., Downes M., Evans R. M., et al. (2020) Neutralization of oxidized phospholipids ameliorates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 31, 189–206.e8 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Dunning S., Hannivoort R. A., de Boer J. F., Buist-Homan M., Faber K. N., and Moshage H. (2009) Superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide inhibit proliferation of activated rat stellate cells and induce different modes of cell death. Liver Int. 29, 922–932 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02004.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Zhang K., and Kaufman R. J. (2008) From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature 454, 455–462 10.1038/nature07203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Yang Z. H., Miyahara H., Takeo J., and Katayama M. (2012) Diet high in fat and sucrose induces rapid onset of obesity-related metabolic syndrome partly through rapid response of genes involved in lipogenesis, insulin signalling and inflammation in mice. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 4, 32 10.1186/1758-5996-4-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Liu J., Zhuang Z. J., Bian D. X., Ma X. J., Xun Y. H., Yang W. J., Luo Y., Liu Y. L., Jia L., Wang Y., Zhu M. L., Ye D. W., Zhou G., Lou G. Q., and Shi J. P. (2014) Toll-like receptor-4 signalling in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high-fat and high-fructose diet in mice. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 41, 482–488 10.1111/1440-1681.12241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Crescenzo R., Bianco F., Falcone I., Coppola P., Liverini G., and Iossa S. (2013) Increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis and mitochondrial efficiency in a model of obesity induced by diets rich in fructose. Eur. J. Nutr. 52, 537–545 10.1007/s00394-012-0356-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Rebollo A., Roglans N., Baena M., Sánchez R. M., Merlos M., Alegret M., and Laguna J. C. (2014) Liquid fructose downregulates Sirt1 expression and activity and impairs the oxidation of fatty acids in rat and human liver cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1841, 514–524 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Leamy A. K., Egnatchik R. A., and Young J. D. (2013) Molecular mechanisms and the role of saturated fatty acids in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Prog. Lipid Res. 52, 165–174 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Min H. K., Kapoor A., Fuchs M., Mirshahi F., Zhou H., Maher J., Kellum J., Warnick R., Contos M. J., and Sanyal A. J. (2012) Increased hepatic synthesis and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism is associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 15, 665–674 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Al-Rasadi K., Rizzo M., Montalto G., and Berg G. (2015) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cardiovascular risk, and carotid inflammation. Angiology 66, 601–603 10.1177/0003319714557353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Huang B. P., Lin C. H., Chen H. M., Lin J. T., Cheng Y. F., and Kao S. H. (2015) AMPK activation inhibits expression of proinflammatory mediators through downregulation of PI3K/p38 MAPK and NF-κB signaling in murine macrophages. DNA Cell Biol. 34, 133–141 10.1089/dna.2014.2630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. O'Neill L. A., and Hardie D. G. (2013) Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation. Nature 493, 346–355 10.1038/nature11862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Salminen A., Hyttinen J. M., and Kaarniranta K. (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits NF-κB signaling and inflammation: impact on healthspan and lifespan. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 89, 667–676 10.1007/s00109-011-0748-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Win S., Than T. A., Zhang J., Oo C., Min R. W. M., and Kaplowitz N. (2018) New insights into the role and mechanism of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase signaling in the pathobiology of liver diseases. Hepatology 67, 2013–2024 10.1002/hep.29689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Luedde T., and Schwabe R. F. (2011) NF-κB in the liver—linking injury, fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 108–118 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Cacicedo J. M., Yagihashi N., Keaney J. F. Jr., Ruderman N. B., and Ido Y. (2004) AMPK inhibits fatty acid-induced increases in NF-κB transactivation in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324, 1204–1209 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Yeung F., Hoberg J. E., Ramsey C. S., Keller M. D., Jones D. R., Frye R. A., and Mayo M. W. (2004) Modulation of NF-κB–dependent transcription and cell survival by the SIRT1 deacetylase. EMBO J. 23, 2369–2380 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Xiong Y., Torsoni A. S., Wu F., Shen H., Liu Y., Zhong X., Canet M. J., Shah Y. M., Omary M. B., Liu Y., and Rui L. (2018) Hepatic NF-κB–inducing kinase (NIK) suppresses mouse liver regeneration in acute and chronic liver diseases. Elife 7, e34152 10.7554/eLife.34152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Mancini S. J., White A. D., Bijland S., Rutherford C., Graham D., Richter E. A., Viollet B., Touyz R. M., Palmer T. M., and Salt I. P. (2017) Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase rapidly suppresses multiple pro-inflammatory pathways in adipocytes including IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 440, 44–56 10.1016/j.mce.2016.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Peng X., Li J., Wang M., Qu K., and Zhu H. (2019) A novel AMPK activator improves hepatic lipid metabolism and leukocyte trafficking in experimental hepatic steatosis. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 140, 153–161 10.1016/j.jphs.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Rabinovitch R. C., Samborska B., Faubert B., Ma E. H., Gravel S. P., Andrzejewski S., Raissi T. C., Pause A., St-Pierre J., and Jones R. G. (2017) AMPK maintains cellular metabolic homeostasis through regulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Cell Rep. 21, 1–9 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Wang S., Zhang M., Liang B., Xu J., Xie Z., Liu C., Viollet B., Yan D., and Zou M. H. (2010) AMPKα2 deletion causes aberrant expression and activation of NAD(P)H oxidase and consequent endothelial dysfunction in vivo: role of 26S proteasomes. Circ. Res. 106, 1117–1128 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.212530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Eid A. A., Ford B. M., Block K., Kasinath B. S., Gorin Y., Ghosh-Choudhury G., Barnes J. L., and Abboud H. E. (2010) AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) negatively regulates Nox4-dependent activation of p53 and epithelial cell apoptosis in diabetes. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 37503–37512 10.1074/jbc.M110.136796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Song P., and Zou M. H. (2012) Regulation of NAD(P)H oxidases by AMPK in cardiovascular systems. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 52, 1607–1619 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Garrido-Maraver J., Paz M. V., Cordero M. D., Bautista-Lorite J., Oropesa-Ávila M., de la Mata M., Pavón A. D., de Lavera I., Alcocer-Gómez E., Galán F., Ybot González P., Cotán D., Jackson S., and Sánchez-Alcázar J. A. (2015) Critical role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the balance between mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis in MELAS disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1852, 2535–2553 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Cordero M. D., Williams M. R., and Ryffel B. (2018) AMP-activated protein kinase regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome during aging. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 29, 8–17 10.1016/j.tem.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Bullón P., Alcocer-Gómez E., Carrión A. M., Marín-Aguilar F., Garrido-Maraver J., Román-Malo L., Ruiz-Cabello J., Culic O., Ryffel B., Apetoh L., Ghiringhelli F., Battino M., Sánchez-Alcazar J. A., and Cordero M. D. (2016) AMPK phosphorylation modulates pain by activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 24, 157–170 10.1089/ars.2014.6120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Kim Y., Wang W., Okla M., Kang I., Moreau R., and Chung S. (2016) Suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome by γ-tocotrienol ameliorates type 2 diabetes. J. Lipid Res. 57, 66–76 10.1194/jlr.M062828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Li X. N., Song J., Zhang L., LeMaire S. A., Hou X., Zhang C., Coselli J. S., Chen L., Wang X. L., Zhang Y., and Shen Y. H. (2009) Activation of the AMPK-FOXO3 pathway reduces fatty acid-induced increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species by upregulating thioredoxin. Diabetes 58, 2246–2257 10.2337/db08-1512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Zhou R., Tardivel A., Thorens B., Choi I., and Tschopp J. (2010) Thioredoxin-interacting protein links oxidative stress to inflammasome activation. Nat. Immunol. 11, 136–140 10.1038/ni.1831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Michalopoulos G. K., and DeFrances M. (2005) Liver regeneration. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 93, 101–134 10.1007/b99968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Guicciardi M. E., and Gores G. J. (2005) Apoptosis: a mechanism of acute and chronic liver injury. Gut 54, 1024–1033 10.1136/gut.2004.053850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Hernandez-Gea V., and Friedman S. L. (2011) Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 425–456 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Malhi H., Guicciardi M. E., and Gores G. J. (2010) Hepatocyte death: a clear and present danger. Physiol. Rev. 90, 1165–1194 10.1152/physrev.00061.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Feldstein A. E., Canbay A., Angulo P., Taniai M., Burgart L. J., Lindor K. D., and Gores G. J. (2003) Hepatocyte apoptosis and Fas expression are prominent features of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 125, 437–443 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00907-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Cao L., Quan X. B., Zeng W. J., Yang X. O., and Wang M. J. (2016) Mechanism of hepatocyte apoptosis. J. Cell Death 9, 19–29 10.4137/jcd.s39824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Hadizadeh F., Faghihimani E., and Adibi P. (2017) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic biomarkers. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 8, 11–26 10.4291/wjgp.v8.i2.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Dhuriya Y. K., and Sharma D. (2018) Necroptosis: a regulated inflammatory mode of cell death. J. Neuroinflammation 15, 199 10.1186/s12974-018-1235-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Linkermann A., and Green D. R. (2014) Necroptosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 455–465 10.1056/NEJMra1310050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Gautheron J., Vucur M., Reisinger F., Cardenas D. V., Roderburg C., Koppe C., Kreggenwinkel K., Schneider A. T., Bartneck M., Neumann U. P., Canbay A., Reeves H. L., Luedde M., Tacke F., Trautwein C., et al. (2014) A positive feedback loop between RIP3 and JNK controls non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 1062–1074 10.15252/emmm.201403856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Qi J., Kim J. W., Zhou Z., Lim C. W., and Kim B. (2020) Ferroptosis affects the progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis via the modulation of lipid peroxidation-mediated cell death in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 68–81 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Xu B., Jiang M., Chu Y., Wang W., Chen D., Li X., Zhang Z., Zhang D., Fan D., Nie Y., Shao F., Wu K., and Liang J. (2018) Gasdermin D plays a key role as a pyroptosis executor of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in humans and mice. J. Hepatol. 68, 773–782 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Kanda T., Matsuoka S., Yamazaki M., Shibata T., Nirei K., Takahashi H., Kaneko T., Fujisawa M., Higuchi T., Nakamura H., Matsumoto N., Yamagami H., Ogawa M., Imazu H., Kuroda K., et al. (2018) Apoptosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 24, 2661–2672 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Wattacheril J., Issa D., and Sanyal A. (2018) Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatic fibrosis: emerging therapies. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 58, 649–662 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Lee U. E., and Friedman S. L. (2011) Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 25, 195–206 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Baglieri J., Brenner D. A., and Kisseleva T. (2019) The role of fibrosis and liver-associated fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1723 10.3390/ijms20071723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Li J., Pan Y., Kan M., Xiao X., Wang Y., Guan F., Zhang X., and Chen L. (2014) Hepatoprotective effects of berberine on liver fibrosis via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Life Sci. 98, 24–30 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.12.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Kang J. W., Hong J. M., and Lee S. M. (2016) Melatonin enhances mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis. J. Pineal Res. 60, 383–393 10.1111/jpi.12319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Yang Y., Zhao Z., Liu Y., Kang X., Zhang H., and Meng M. (2015) Suppression of oxidative stress and improvement of liver functions in mice by ursolic acid via LKB1-AMP-activated protein kinase signaling. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 30, 609–618 10.1111/jgh.12723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Caligiuri A., Bertolani C., Guerra C. T., Aleffi S., Galastri S., Trappoliere M., Vizzutti F., Gelmini S., Laffi G., Pinzani M., and Marra F. (2008) Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase modulates the activated phenotype of hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 47, 668–676 10.1002/hep.21995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Kumar P., Smith T., Rahman K., Thorn N. E., and Anania F. A. (2014) Adiponectin agonist ADP355 attenuates CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in mice. PLoS ONE 9, e110405 10.1371/journal.pone.0110405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Zhai X., Qiao H., Guan W., Li Z., Cheng Y., Jia X., and Zhou Y. (2015) Curcumin regulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1α expression by AMPK pathway in hepatic stellate cells in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 746, 56–62 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.10.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Zhang W., Wu R., Zhang F., Xu Y., Liu B., Yang Y., Zhou H., Wang L., Wan K., Xiao X., and Zhang X. (2012) Thiazolidinediones improve hepatic fibrosis in rats with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by activating the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase signalling pathway. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 39, 1026–1033 10.1111/1440-1681.12020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Dong Z., Su L., Esmaili S., Iseli T. J., Ramezani-Moghadam M., Hu L., Xu A., George J., and Wang J. (2015) Adiponectin attenuates liver fibrosis by inducing nitric oxide production of hepatic stellate cells. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 93, 1327–1339 10.1007/s00109-015-1313-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. da Silva Morais A., Abarca-Quinones J., Guigas B., Viollet B., Stärkel P., Horsmans Y., and Leclercq I. A. (2009) Development of hepatic fibrosis occurs normally in AMPK-deficient mice. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 118, 411–420 10.1042/CS20090293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Lim J. Y., Oh M. A., Kim W. H., Sohn H. Y., and Park S. I. (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits TGF-β-induced fibrogenic responses of hepatic stellate cells by targeting transcriptional coactivator p300. J. Cell. Physiol. 227, 1081–1089 10.1002/jcp.22824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Heinrichs D., Knauel M., Offermanns C., Berres M. L., Nellen A., Leng L., Schmitz P., Bucala R., Trautwein C., Weber C., Bernhagen J., and Wasmuth H. E. (2011) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) exerts antifibrotic effects in experimental liver fibrosis via CD74. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 17444–17449 10.1073/pnas.1107023108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Myers R. W., Guan H. P., Ehrhart J., Petrov A., Prahalada S., Tozzo E., Yang X., Kurtz M. M., Trujillo M., Gonzalez Trotter D., Feng D., Xu S., Eiermann G., Holahan M. A., Rubins D., et al. (2017) Systemic pan-AMPK activator MK-8722 improves glucose homeostasis but induces cardiac hypertrophy. Science 357, 507–511 10.1126/science.aah5582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]