Abstract
In mice, experimental influenza virus infection stimulates CD8 T cell infiltration of the airways. Virus is cleared by day 9, and between days 8 and 9 there is an abrupt change in CD8 T cell motility behavior transitioning from low velocity and high confinement on day 8, to high velocity with continued high confinement on day 9. We hypothesized that loss of virus and/or antigen signals in the context of high chemokine levels drives the T cells into a rapid surveillance mode. Virus infection induces chemokine production, which may change when the virus is cleared. We therefore sought to examine this period of rapid changes to the T cell environment in the tissue and seek evidence on the roles of peptide-MHC and chemokine receptor interactions. Experiments were performed to block G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling with Pertussis toxin (Ptx). Ptx treatment generally reduced cell velocities and mildly increased confinement suggesting chemokine mediated arrest (velocity <2 μm/min) (Friedman RS, 2005), except on day 8 when velocity increased and confinement was relieved. Blocking specific peptide-MHC with monoclonal antibody unexpectedly decreased velocities on days 7 through 9, suggesting TCR/peptide-MHC interactions promote cell mobility in the tissue. Together, these results suggest the T cells are engaged with antigen bearing and chemokine producing cells that affect motility in ways that vary with the day after infection. The increase in velocities on day 9 were reversed by addition of specific peptide, consistent with the idea that antigen signals become limiting on day 9 compared to earlier time points. Thus, antigen and chemokine signals act to alternately promote and restrict CD8 T cell motility until the point of virus clearance, suggesting the switch in motility behavior on day 9 may be due to a combination of limiting antigen in the presence of high chemokine signals as the virus is cleared.
Introduction
Influenza viruses infect roughly 12 percent of the global population in any given year [1]. This leads to lost productivity, hospitalizations, and deaths. In the 2017–18 season there was a record 80,000 deaths in the US alone [2]. In 2018–19, the northern hemisphere experienced the longest flu season in over 20 years [3]. Understanding how the immune system controls influenza infection is paramount to the development of improved vaccination strategies and for understanding the disease process itself. Cytotoxic CD8 T cells are responsible for the initial clearance of infected cells, especially in a primary infection when there are no pre-existing antibodies or other types of adaptive immunity [4, 5]. In order to reach the site of infection, the trachea and airway epithelium, the CD8 T cells must traffic through the circulation, exit into the tissue, and migrate within the tissue before crossing into the epithelial surface. The tissue microenvironment that the T cells must interact and communicate with is complex and highly structured, with features such as collagen density, composition, and edema changing over the course of an infection as the immune response progresses and the virus gets cleared, between day 8 and 9 of the infection.
In the mouse model of influenza infection, virus replication peaks 3–5 days after inoculation [6, 7]. CD8 T cells appear in the tissue beginning around 5–6 days, after which virus titers begin to decrease, and T cell numbers peak at day 8 [5, 8]. As the virus is cleared between day 8 and 9, there is a logarithmic drop in the number of T cells in the lung and airways. Presumably, the end of the infection produces a change in signals that recruit or retain the T cells. It is believed that most of the virus specific T cells die by apoptosis, though it’s unclear if this happens in the tissue or after the T cells leave the tissue and may be a combination of both.
Our lab developed a model of influenza tracheitis that we use to perform imaging of immune cell motility by intravital multiphoton microscopy (IVMPM) [9]. IVMPM can optically penetrate the entire depth of the trachea once it is exposed by minor surgery [9, 10]. Using genetically engineered CD8 T cells that are fluorescent and recognize an ovalbumin (OVA) peptide presented by H2 Kb class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins (OT-I-GFP CD8 T cells) [11, 12] and a genetically modified influenza virus that expresses the OVA peptide in the hemagglutinin of the virus [13], we can image the pseudo-virus-specific OT-I T cells as they migrate in the infected trachea. As CD8 T cells infiltrate the tissue, they progressively accumulate and gradually become arrested and confined by day 8. We previously reported that there is an abrupt change in motility behavior between day 8 and 9 in which T cell velocity increases, yet the cells remain mostly confined [9]. We have interpreted this behavior as a switch to a rapid surveillance mode in which the T cells vigorously search their local environment for antigen bearing or infected cells [9]. Blocking OVA peptide-MHC complexes with the 25D.1 mAb at day 7 recapitulated the abrupt increase in cell velocities, suggesting that the presence of antigen bearing cells is partly responsible for the cell arrest observed [9], presumably because the T cells are engaging these cells. However, it is possible that antigen is only one of several signals that change as the virus is cleared and antigen becomes much more limiting. The production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines likely decrease, and other pro-resolving factors increase [14].
In the present work, we further interrogated the roles of antigen and G-protein coupled chemokine receptors (GPCR) in regulating CD8 T cell motility behavior. Strategies to block signals from peptide-MHC and GPCR signaling using Ptx treatment were employed. We also artificially re-introduced antigen in the form of soluble peptides to see if this reversed the rapid surveillance and increased cell arrest. We found that both the presence of antigen and GPCR signals (presumably chemokine driven) modified CD8 T cell motility, reinforcing the conclusions that these are major signals regulating the T cells in the tissue.
Materials and methods
Mice
Male C57BL/6J (B6) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and primary inoculation with influenza virus was performed between 8 and 12 weeks of age. All animals were housed in the University of Rochester Vivarium facilities under specific pathogen-free conditions using microisolator technology. All animal experiments were performed according to the protocol approved by the University Committee for Animal Research (the University’s IACUC).
Cell transfer and infection
A line of GFP expressing OT-1 animals is maintained and used as donors for adoptive transfer of C57BL/6 naïve animals prior to infection. Whole splenocytes are isolated, and 1x106 splenocytes contained in 200μl of DPBS are transferred via tail vein. 24–48 hours post transfer, the animals are sedated with 120 mg/kg of Avertin. Once animals are sedated and exhibit no pedal reflex, 30 μl of X31-OVA-1 (2.7x103 EID50/ml) derived from a laboratory stock grown in house is administered intra-nasally [13]. Animals are monitored until fully recovered from anesthesia, and then daily for weight-loss.
Intravital Multiphoton Microscopy (IVMPM)
All images were collected by an Olympus FVMPE-RS system (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) using an Olympus 25× water objective (XLPLN25XWMP2, 1.05NA). The system was equipped with two two-photon lasers: Spectra-Physics InSightX3 (680nm-1300nm, Spectra-Physics, Santa Clara, CA) and Spectra-Physics MaiTai DeepSee Ti:Sapphire laser (690nm-1040nm). There were four Photon Multiplier Tubes (PMTs) and two filter cubes (Blue/Green cube: 420-460nm/495-540nm, Red/Far Red cube: 575-630nm/645-685nm) for multi-color imaging. A galvanometer scanner was used for scanning, and all images were acquired at ~1 frame/s. PMT gains for all imaging were used between 500 and 700 airy units in the Olympus Fluoview software.
Sedation and anti-convulsants
Prior to surgery, the animal is anesthetized with pentobarbital (65 mg/kg). During imaging the level of anesthesia is maintained with isofluorane, administered at 0.5–2% as necessary based on heart rate. Pancuronium bromide (0.4mg/kg) is administered prior to imaging to prevent movement of the imaging area.
Monoclonal antibodies
The following antibodies were used in the live imaging experiments. Those in this list were injected at 100μg/100μl intra-venously, just prior to live imaging on the multi-photon microscope: LEAF purified Mouse IgG1 BioLegend #400153; and anti-mouse MHC Class I (H-2Kb) bound to SIINFEKL peptide (OVA residues 257–264) BioXCell #BE0207 [15]. N = 3–5 animals per group, 33 total. Surgical set up takes about 15 minutes, and the animal is on the scope for about an hour—1 1/2 hrs resulting in 30–45 mins of usable data.
The introduction of Pertussis toxin
Ptx (List Biological Laboratories #180), was injected at 1.5μg/200μl. This was performed intra-venously 5 hours prior to live imaging by multi-photon microscopy. N = 3–5 animals per group, 33 total. Surgical set up takes about 15 minutes, and the animal is on the scope for about an hour—1 1/2 hrs resulting in 30–45 mins of usable data.
The introduction of OVA SIINFEKL peptides
To introduce additional antigen into the mice at days 8 and 9 after infection, 100μg SIINFEKL peptide dissolved in PBS was injected intravenously immediately after sedation and just prior to imaging [16]. N = 5 animals per group, 20 total. Surgical set up takes about 15 minutes and the animal is on the scope for about an hour– 1 1/2hrs resulting in 30–45 min of usable data.
Surgical set-up
The hair is removed with a shaver from one hind leg, thigh to groin, exposing the skin for the MouseOX sensor. The hair is removed from the thoracic area with scissors and/or a shaver. The animal is placed in a supine position, on a warming blanket, once a surgical plane of anesthesia is determined by lack of both pedal and palpebral reflex. The coat is opened from below the chin to the top of the ribcage. The salivary glands are separated to reveal the muscles covering the trachea. Using round forceps, the muscles are separated to expose the trachea. The forceps are then inserted beneath the trachea to lift and separate it from the muscle and mouse body. A small flexible plastic support is placed in the space created by the forceps to permanently hold the trachea above and separated from the muscle, surrounding tissue and coat.
The animal is moved to the previously warmed stage. A small incision is made between the cartilage rings below the larynx. The steel cannula is inserted into the opening in the trachea until it reaches just below the sternum. The cannula provides physical immobilization of the trachea. The cannula is secured on the stage with a support that holds it in position, so it is correctly aligned with the trachea. It is held in place with 2 screws that prevent it from moving in transport, or during the attachment of the respirator. The forepaws are secured to the stage with surgical tape to maintain position of the mouse body on the stage. A few drops of saline are placed on the exposed tracheal tissue to prevent drying.
Maintaining blood O2 saturation and temperature
The cannula is quickly attached to a Harvard Inspira asv ventilator, and both 100% O2 and 0.5% isofluorane flow is started, according to mouse weight. The MouseOX Plus thigh sensor is attached to the exposed thigh and monitoring is begun immediately. Oxygenation levels are maintained at 95% and heart rate ranges between 250 and 600 beats per minute. The rectal body-temperature is continuously monitored and maintained using a small animal temperature controller that is connected to a rectal probe and a feedback-regulated rodent heating pad. After achieving stable physiology, and verification of lack of both pedal and palpebral reflex, the pancuronium bromide (0.4 mg/kg) is administered, based on body weight. The saline covering the exposed trachea is blotted away and replaced with 0.05% agarose to seal the exposed area. Once the agarose is solidified, a support ring is placed over the imaging area and covered with a piece of plastic wrap. Approximately 5 ml of water is pooled over the imaging area to submerse the objective.
Humane end point
Imaging is performed with the animals fully sedated as described above. At the end of an imaging session, which last one to two hours, all animals are euthanized by increasing isofluorane dose and ceasing respiratory support. The animal’s heartbeat is continually measured, and the animal is considered euthanized when the heart stops beating. This occurs within one to five minutes after imaging has stopped. Thus, no post-operative care is needed. The numbers of animals used are indicated in the figure legends for each set of data.
Data analysis
The imaging data was analyzed using Volocity 6.3 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) to determine motility parameters. Each cell track was manually checked and ambiguous tracks, such as two cells coming together and indistinguishably separating or cells with partial tracks caused by leaving the imaging field, were removed from the analysis. The motility parameters we focused on include velocity (μm/min), displacement (the distance from where a cell started and where it is at the end of the imaging session), and confinement index, a parameter that measures how restricted a cell’s movement is in its environment. For more information see [17]. Distance to surface measurements were analyzed using custom software https://github.com/tophamlab20/Distance-Algorithmm. Statistical testing was performed using non-parametric tests and multiple comparison corrections where appropriate. Nonparametric analysis using Mann Whitney U test was used for between group comparisons at each day, in consideration of data skewness and outliers. Multiple test adjustment was applied to control for type I error while appropriate. All statistical analysis was performed in R 3.6.3. Significance as set as p<0.01.
Results
Pertussis toxin sensitivity
Chemokines and chemokine receptors are critical in directing T cells to sites of infection. CXCL9 and CXCL10 from epithelial cells are strongly induced by influenza infection [14, 18]. The receptor for these chemokines, CXCR3, is expressed on activated CD8 T cells and is required for efficient localization of T cells within the infected respiratory tract [19]. We therefore reasoned that interfering with chemokine signaling would affect T cell migration across the interstitium towards the infected airways. Pertussis toxin (Ptx) interferes with GPCR signaling which is the main pathway for most chemokines including CXCL9 and CXCL10 [20]. Naïve OT-I CD8 T cells were adoptively transferred one day prior to intranasal inoculation with recombinant X31-OVA (SIINFEKL) virus. The animals were then treated on days 6–9 with Ptx five hours prior to imaging [15]. Ptx sensitivity varied over the course of infection. On days 6 and 7, Ptx treatment reduced cell velocities, displacement, and increased confinement (Fig 1A–1C). However, on day 8 when T cell velocities naturally reach a nadir and confinement is high (First half, S1 Movie), the opposite effects were observed. T cell velocities increased with Ptx, and confinement decreased (Fig 1A–1C). On day 9 when cell velocities normally increase markedly, but transiently [9] (Second half, S1 Movie), the effects of Ptx slowed the cells and decreased confinement, with the largest fold-changes observed. Overall, the effects of Ptx-mediated inhibition of signaling through GPCRs varies over the course of acute infection. We interpret these results to indicate chemokine signals are needed as the T cells infiltrate the tissue from the bloodstream on days 6 and 7, but by day 8 the majority of cells are arrested (velocities <2 μm/min) and more confined in the control mice, presumably as they have reached the epithelium. For example, the highest number of CD8 T cells obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage occurs on day 8 [21]. This may be explained by the physical environment of the epithelium, potential to arrest in the presence of high chemokine concentrations [22], and/or engagement with antigen bearing cells (ABC), which will be investigated later in this paper. Thus, the effects of Ptx treatment are dynamic, varying with the day after infection as the T cell infiltration and clearance of virus progresses with each day. GPCR signals promote cell infiltration early in the responses but can also cause arrest in areas of the tissue with high concentrations of signals [22]. The significant increases in apparent cell velocities with high confinement that occur on day 9 also appear GPCR dependent, though we cannot rule out other signals that change and contribute to the rapid movement.
Distance from the airway
Influenza mostly infects the epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract. If the T cells are responding to chemokine signals that direct them towards the infected epithelium on days 6–8, then we would predict that interference with these signals would result in delayed migration to the airway surfaces. We therefore developed a computational approach to measure the depth of the T cells in the trachea relative to the airway surface. A computational algorithm was written to measure the distance of each cell from the second harmonic generation (SHG) signal at the outer edge of the trachea, which is unambiguous compared to the change in refractive index at the airway surface. The measurements were conducted from days 6–9 of infection. In the control mice, T cell abundance closest to the airways peaked on day 7 and actually decreased on days 8 and 9 (Fig 2). Consistent with the predictions, Ptx treated mice demonstrated delayed accumulation of T cells close to the airway surfaces that was particularly evident on days 6–7 (Fig 2). By day 8 the proportion of T cells closest to the airways had eventually caught up to some extent in the Ptx treated mice, but never reached the peak levels observed in the controls (Fig 2). These results indicate that the T cells rely on Ptx sensitive signals for optimal migration to the site of infection in the epithelium.
Peptide-MHC sensitivity
It was not possible in our studies to unambiguously distinguish infected cells and antigen cross-presenting cells, so we are using the term antigen bearing cells “ABC”. We hypothesized that chemokine signals and the presence of ABC that can engage T cells in a peptide-MHC specific manner cooperate to retain effector CD8 T cells at the epithelium where the infection is present. We expected encounter with ABC to result in cell arrest, at least transiently, as the CD8 T cells kill their targets or are further activated by APC. To investigate the role of antigen encounter, as above, naïve OT-I CD8 T cells were adoptively transferred and the mice infected the next day with X31-OVA. To inhibit peptide-MHC (pMHC) specific T cell interactions, we used a monoclonal antibody (25-D1) generated against the SIINFEKL/H2Kb class I MHC-peptide complex to treat the animals immediately prior to imaging [15]. There were no significant effects on day 6, an early time point when the number of T cells engaged with ABC in the tissue is expected to be relatively low. However, on days 7–9 specific pMHC blocking unexpectedly and significantly decreased cell velocities and displacement (Fig 3A and 3B) compared to untreated and isotype treated controls but had little effect on the confinement indices (Fig 3C). For unknown reasons, the isotype control affected cell motility parameters on day 9, but not on other days. The anti-pMHC treatment still further reduced all parameters on day 9 compared to either the isotype or untreated controls. These results suggest TCR engagement with pMHC has a role governing the motility behavior of the T cells, possibly by further activating the cells in the tissue.
Re-introduction of antigen
Our results so far suggest a delicate balance of pMHC and presumably TCR signaling affects motility as well as arrest. When pMHC levels are low but sufficient to promote motility, the cells move optimally. When pMHC levels are high, the T cells arrest. We reasoned that the changes on day 9 were the result of a significant reduction in signals received from ABC as the virus is cleared [9], reducing cell arrest. To address this, we re-introduced antigen in the form of soluble SIINFEKL peptides on days 8 and 9. The introduction of peptides had no effect on motility parameters on day 8 when virus and, presumably, ABC bearing high pMHC levels are still abundant. However, on day 9, the introduction of peptides resulted in significantly decreased velocities and displacement, increased numbers of cells arrested, and heightened confinement compared to vehicle controls (Fig 4A–4C). This is consistent with the hypothesis that the balance of pMHC and TCR signaling shifts from day 8 to day 9. This strongly suggests that the balance of antigen signals in the presence of continued chemokine signaling result marked changes in velocity and confinement. This is consistent with the interpretation that the still highly activated T cells switch to a rapid surveillance of the surrounding cells for the presence of virus or residual antigen and ABC on day 9 as a result of reduced antigen availability.
Discussion
Chemokines and chemokine receptors play major roles in guiding T cell migration into the infected airways. During influenza infection, secretion of CXCL9 and CXCL10 from the inflamed epithelium recruits CD8 T cells expressing CXCR3 chemokine receptors [19]. We have also shown that neutrophil-derived CXCL12 is an important enhancer of CD8 T cell motility within the infected airways, signaling via CXCR4 [23]. Neutrophil depletion delays CD8 T cell recruitment into the tissue as well as impairing virus clearance [23, 24]. We observed that using Ptx treatment significantly reduced virus-specific CD8 T cell motility on days 7 and 8 when T cell numbers in the tissue are highest, reducing cell velocities, decreasing displacement, and increasing measurements of T cell confinement. Given the effects of Ptx on chemokine receptor signals, this suggests chemokine signals are critical for efficient motility in the tissue. Ptx treatment also led to slower penetration of CD8 T cells to the epithelial surface. Individual T cells are known to migrate using a random walk [25]. This is consistent with the idea that chemokine signals promote chemokinesis and directional accumulation at the infected epithelium. Interestingly, at the peak of the T cell response on day 8 when cell numbers are highest and virus is still present, Ptx treatment relieved cell arrest and confinement. We also noted that, in the controls, the highest median number of T cells closest to the airways occurred on day 7, and “retreated” on days 8 to 9. The reason for the apparent decrease in median penetration depth is not clear but may have to do with diminishing viral load and/or localization to other structures in the tissue containing virus infected cells or antigen. This is consistent with the idea that once the majority of T cells have reached the sites of infection, they arrest through a combination of physical confinement (the epithelium is narrow in cross section, and there is dense extracellular matrix underlying the epithelial surface), high CXCL9 and CXCL10 chemokine concentrations at the epithelium, which can contribute to arrest, and presumably engagement with antigen bearing cells in the form of either APC or infected targets. This is discussed further below.
On day 9 when virus is cleared, the CD8 T cells normally exhibit an increase in cell velocities, and yet remain confined. Imaging of this behavior shows rapid extension and retraction of T cell protrusions, but little distance traveled (compare First half and Second half in S1 Movie). We have interpreted this collective behavior as rapid surveillance for residual antigen and virus by the highly activated effector T cells. Treatment with Ptx at this time point significantly decreased all the motility parameters, suggesting a requirement for GPCR signals for optimal surveillance of the tissue as the infection resolves. How chemokines and chemokine receptors affect changes to T cell motility on day 9 is not well understood. The chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are expressed constitutively by airway epithelium and increase during infection [26, 27]. In addition to potentially providing chemotactic and chemokinetic signals, they may be needed for integrin activation [28], each of which could contribute to the cell behavior we observe, though we have not formally tested these mechanisms in our model.
The experiments blocking MHC with specific monoclonal antibodies showed significant effects on CD8 T cell motility. However, the effects were not entirely as expected. If we take the hypothesis that engaging antigen bearing cells expressing high levels of pMHC will cause cells to arrest, at least briefly, as has been observed in other T cell motility studies [29], then we would predict that blocking antigen signals would partially or completely reverse cell arrest. This is the result we reported in a previous paper [9]. On day 6 there were no differences in the motility parameters between pMHC mAb treated mice and isotype control mice, likely because few T cells had found their targets. But on days 7–9, velocities were consistently reduced with pMHC mAb treatment, with greatest magnitude of the effect on day 8, a time when we expect maximal engagement with ABC. The experimental conditions were similar to previous work where pMHC treatment on day 7 increased velocities and decreased confinement. The timing of the pMHC mAb differed in the two sets of experiments with the earlier work administering mAb one or so hours before imaging compared to the current experiments where mAb was administered immediately before imaging commenced, perhaps resulting in the different outcomes if for example, pMHC blocking and disengaging from ABC takes a longer time. There was still an effect on day 9, after virus is cleared and no productively infected cells are detectable, suggesting there may be residual antigen. Confinement indices were not affected at most time points, suggesting chemokine and/or physical factors maintain confinement and arrest. We conclude that effector CD8 T cells in the airways need T cell receptor signals that stimulate optimal motility.
TCR signals affect T cell motility in several ways. TCR signals result in integrins switching to an active conformation, enhancing their adhesive properties though outside-in signaling [30]. TCR signals also promote upregulation of chemokine receptors [31] and production of cytokines that can activate other cells in the tissue to produce more chemokines. TNFα and IFN–γ in particular are known to enhance production of CXCL9 and CXCL10 by epithelial cells [32, 33]. In the present study, we did not directly probe which mechanisms were responsible for optimal T cell motility but the likely answer is that several overlapping mechanisms each partially contribute to driving T cell motility.
Supporting the idea that antigen signals are limiting on day 9, resulting in the observed increased motility as the cells search for residual antigen, the addition of soluble SIINFEKL peptides into the mice resulted in significantly decreased velocities and increased confinement. There was little effect of the peptides added on day 8. These results further support the notion that signals through the TCR affect both movement and arrest depending on the day of infection.
Overall, the combined results of Ptx treatment, pMHC blockade, and re-introduction of exogenous antigen paint a consistent picture of how chemokine signals and T cell engagement with ABC each independently regulate CD8 T cell motility in the acute phase of the infection. The individual effects vary as the infection and infiltration of the T cells into the tissue progress. It is important to consider that T cell responses in the tissues are dynamic and evolve as the immune response begins, reaches a peak, and then resolves. Studies of T cell motility that use a single time point during an acute response may not reveal the full picture of how different signals regulate T cell migration over the course of an infection.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Yurong Gao of the Multiphoton Core Lab for her technical support and Jonathan Carroll Nellenback for the Matlab module used to measure T cell penetration into the tissue.
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from ImmPort (doi: 10.21430/M3H6B9CA5D).
Funding Statement
DJT 2P01-AI102851-06 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) https://www.niaid.nih.gov/ MS GM007356 National Institute of General Medical Sciences Medical Scientist Training Program T32 https://www.nigms.nih.gov/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Troeger CE, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Zimsen SRM, Albertson SB, Abate D, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and hospitalisations due to influenza lower respiratory tract infections, 2017: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2019;7(1):69–89. 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30496-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Garten R, Blanton L, Elal AIA, Alabi N, Barnes J, Biggerstaff M, et al. Update: Influenza Activity in the United States During the 2017–18 Season and Composition of the 2018–19 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(22):634–42. Epub 2018/06/08. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6722a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu X, Blanton L, Elal AIA, Alabi N, Barnes J, Biggerstaff M, et al. Update: Influenza Activity in the United States During the 2018–19 Season and Composition of the 2019–20 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(24):544–51. Epub 2019/06/21. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6824a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doherty PC, Topham DJ, Tripp RA, Cardin RD, Brooks JW, Stevenson PG. Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections. Immunol Rev. 1997;159:105–17. 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb01010.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Topham DJ, Tripp RA, Doherty PC. CD8+ T cells clear influenza virus by perforin or Fas-dependent processes. J Immunol. 1997;159(11):5197–200. Epub 1998/04/21. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Polakos NK, Cornejo JC, Murray DA, Wright KO, Treanor JJ, Crispe IN, et al. Kupffer cell-dependent hepatitis occurs during influenza infection. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(4):1169–78; quiz 404–5. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee HY, Topham DJ, Park SY, Hollenbaugh J, Treanor J, Mosmann TR, et al. Simulation and prediction of the adaptive immune response to influenza A virus infection. J Virol. 2009;83(14):7151–65. 10.1128/JVI.00098-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Topham DJ, Doherty PC. Clearance of an influenza A virus by CD4+ T cells is inefficient in the absence of B cells. J Virol. 1998;72(1):882–5. Epub 1998/01/07. 10.1128/JVI.72.1.882-885.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lambert Emo K, Hyun YM, Reilly E, Barilla C, Gerber S, Fowell D, et al. Live Imaging of Influenza Infection of the Trachea Reveals Dynamic Regulation of CD8+ T Cell Motility by Antigen. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(9):e1005881 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clarke SR, Barnden M, Kurts C, Carbone FR, Miller JF, Heath WR. Characterization of the ovalbumin-specific TCR transgenic line OT-I: MHC elements for positive and negative selection. Immunol Cell Biol. 2000;78(2):110–7. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00889.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.<A transgenic mouse model to analyze CD81 effector T cell differentiation in vivo.pdf>. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76(1):17–27. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thomas PG, Brown SA, Yue W, So J, Webby RJ, Doherty PC. An unexpected antibody response to an engineered influenza virus modifies CD8+ T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006. 10.1073/pnas.0511185103 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wareing MD, Lyon AB, Lu B, Gerard C, Sarawar SR. Chemokine expression during the development and resolution of a pulmonary leukocyte response to influenza A virus infection in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76(4):886–95. Epub 2004/07/09. 10.1189/jlb.1203644 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Porgador A, Yewdell JW, Deng Y, Bennink JR, Germain RN. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide- MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity. 1997;6(6):715–26. 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80447-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gaylo-Moynihan A, Prizant H, Popovic M, Fernandes NRJ, Anderson CS, Chiou KK, et al. Programming of Distinct Chemokine-Dependent and -Independent Search Strategies for Th1 and Th2 Cells Optimizes Function at Inflamed Sites. Immunity. 2019;51(2):298–309 e6. Epub 2019/08/11. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.026 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beltman JB, Maree AF, de Boer RJ. Analysing immune cell migration. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(11):789–98. 10.1038/nri2638 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stegemann-Koniszewski S, Jeron A, Gereke M, Geffers R, Kroger A, Gunzer M, et al. Alveolar Type II Epithelial Cells Contribute to the Anti-Influenza A Virus Response in the Lung by Integrating Pathogen- and Microenvironment-Derived Signals. mBio. 2016;7(3). Epub 2016/05/05. 10.1128/mBio.00276-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hickman HD, Reynoso GV, Ngudiankama BF, Cush SS, Gibbs J, Bennink JR, et al. CXCR3 chemokine receptor enables local CD8(+) T cell migration for the destruction of virus-infected cells. Immunity. 2015;42(3):524–37. Epub 2015/03/15. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.<Lymphocyte-specific chemokine receptor CXCR3-regulation, chemokine binding and genelocalization.pdf>. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Polakos NK, Klein I, Richter MV, Zaiss DM, Giannandrea M, Crispe IN, et al. Early intrahepatic accumulation of CD8+ T cells provides a source of effectors for nonhepatic immune responses. J Immunol. 2007;179(1):201–10. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.201 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Friedman RS, Jacobelli J, Krummel MF. Mechanisms of T cell motility and arrest: deciphering the relationship between intra- and extracellular determinants. Semin Immunol. 2005;17(6):387–99. Epub 2005/10/13. 10.1016/j.smim.2005.09.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lim K, Hyun YM, Lambert-Emo K, Capece T, Bae S, Miller R, et al. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells in the airways. Science. 2015;349(6252):aaa4352 10.1126/science.aaa4352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reilly EC, Lambert-Emo K, Topham DJ. The Effects of Acute Neutrophil Depletion on Resolution of Acute Influenza Infection, Establishment of Tissue Resident Memory (TRM), and Heterosubtypic Immunity. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164247 10.1371/journal.pone.0164247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krummel MF, Bartumeus F, Gerard A. T cell migration, search strategies and mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(3):193–201. Epub 2016/02/09. 10.1038/nri.2015.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Law AH, Lee DC, Yuen KY, Peiris M, Lau AS. Cellular response to influenza virus infection: a potential role for autophagy in CXCL10 and interferon-alpha induction. Cellular & molecular immunology. 2010;7(4):263–70. Epub 2010/05/18. 10.1038/cmi.2010.25 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang J, Oberley-Deegan R, Wang S, Nikrad M, Funk CJ, Hartshorn KL, et al. Differentiated human alveolar type II cells secrete antiviral IL-29 (IFN-lambda 1) in response to influenza A infection. J Immunol. 2009;182(3):1296–304. Epub 2009/01/22. 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1296 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ebert LM, Schaerli P, Moser B. Chemokine-mediated control of T cell traffic in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. Molecular immunology. 2005;42(7):799–809. Epub 2005/04/15. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.040 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ward SG, Marelli-Berg FM. Mechanisms of chemokine and antigen-dependent T-lymphocyte navigation. Biochem J. 2009;418(1):13–27. Epub 2009/01/23. 10.1042/BJ20081969 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shen B, Delaney MK, Du X. Inside-out, outside-in, and inside-outside-in: G protein signaling in integrin-mediated cell adhesion, spreading, and retraction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(5):600–6. Epub 2012/09/18. 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burbach BJ, Medeiros RB, Mueller KL, Shimizu Y. T-cell receptor signaling to integrins. Immunol Rev. 2007;218:65–81. Epub 2007/07/13. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00527.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Antonelli A, Fallahi P, Ferrari SM, Corrado A, Sebastiani M, Manfredi A, et al. Chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 9 serum levels in mixed cryoglobulinaemia are associated with circulating levels of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(6):864–70. Epub 2012/07/07. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kraft M, Riedel S, Maaser C, Kucharzik T, Steinbuechel A, Domschke W, et al. IFN-gamma synergizes with TNF-alpha but not with viable H. pylori in up-regulating CXC chemokine secretion in gastric epithelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;126(3):474–81. Epub 2001/12/12. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01634.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from ImmPort (doi: 10.21430/M3H6B9CA5D).