Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237696

Does menstrual hygiene management and water, sanitation, and hygiene predict reproductive tract infections among reproductive women in urban areas in Ethiopia?

Ayechew Ademas 1,#, Metadel Adane 1,*,#, Tadesse Sisay 1, Helmut Kloos 2, Betelhiem Eneyew 1, Awoke Keleb 1, Mistir Lingerew 1, Atimen Derso 1, Kassahun Alemu 3
Editor: Hans-Uwe Dahms4
PMCID: PMC7444535  PMID: 32822377

Abstract

Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are a public health concern in Ethiopia. However, the relationship between menstrual hygiene management (MHM) and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) factors to RTIs have not been well addressed. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2019 among 602 systematically selected reproductive-age women aged 15–49 years in Dessie City. Data were collected using a questionnaire and a direct observation checklist. RTIs were identified by the presence during one year before data collection of one or more signs of vaginal discharge, itching/irritation or ulcers/lesions around the vulva, pain during urination and sexual intercourse, and lower abdominal pain and lower back pain. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis with 95%CI (confidence interval). The self-reported prevalence of RTIs was 11.0%(95%CI:8.5–13.7%) during one year prior to the survey. The most commonly reported symptoms of RTI were burning micturition (9.1%) and vaginal discharge (6.1%). Three-fourths 443(75.0%) of households used traditional pit latrines and the majority of the study participants 527(89.2%) did not meet the basic access requirement of 20 liters of water per capita per day. The majority 562(95.1%) of the study participants did not have multiple sexual partners during the last year and 97.8% did not practiced sexual intercourse during menstruation. The most common type of blood-absorbent material used was a sanitary pad 497(84.8%) followed by cloth 89(15.2%). Factors significantly associated with RTIs were using unclean latrines (AOR: 4.20; 95%CI:2.00–8.80), not washing hands with soap before touching the genital area (AOR: 3.94; 95%CI:1.49–10.45), history of symptoms of RTIs in the past year (AOR: 5.88; 95%CI:2.30–14.98), having multiple sexual partners in the past year (AOR: 4.46; 95%CI:1.59–12.53), changing absorbent material only once per day (AOR: 8.99; 95%CI:4.51–17.92), and washing the genital area only once per day during menstruation (AOR: 5.76; 95%CI:2.07–16.05). The self-reported prevalence of RTI showed that one women experienced RTI among ten reproductive-age women. Designing a women’s health policy that focuses on ensuring availability of WASH facilities and improving MHM at the community level is key for sustainably preventing RTIs.

Introduction

Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) are infections of the reproductive system and belong to a group of communicable diseases that are transmitted predominantly by sexual contact (mainly chlamydia, gonorrhea, chancroid, syphilis and HIV) but also include endogenous infections and iatropenic infections linked with unsafe abortions and poor delivery practices [1]. A woman with an RTI can experience various symptoms ranging from simple backache to lower abdominal pain, genital ulcers, vulvar itching, inguinal swelling, abnormal vaginal discharge, burning sensation, and dyspareunia [2].

RTIs are among the most common causes of illness among women of reproductive age worldwide and especially in developing countries. Nevertheless, public health research, interventions, and services give very little attention to RTIs [3]. The National Family Health Survey of India reported that 39.2% of women in India surveyed between 2006 and 2008 had one or more diagnosed RTIs whereas the prevalence of self-reported RTI symptoms was 11–18% in various nationally representative studies [4]. In India alone, healthcare workers estimate about 40 million new cases of RTI emerge each year [5].

RTIs are highly prevalent in Ethiopia. For instance, in a study of 210 patients conducted at St. Paul’s Hospital in Addis Ababa between September 2015 and July 2016, the overall prevalence of bacterial vaginosis was reported at 48.6% [6]. Surveillance in Ethiopia from July 2014 to June 2015 revealed a total of 1,421 sexually transmitted infection (STI) cases from 20 sentinel surveillance sites; the 1,509 STI symptom episodes were mostly vaginal discharge (52.2%), followed by urethral discharge (25.3%), lower abdominal pain (13.3%), and genital ulcers (7.4%). Of the total number of cases, 968 (68.1%) were females, who bore the highest burden [7].

The impact of menstrual hygiene, which is critical for women, has been largely neglected by water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) sector researchers. As a result, millions of women and girls continue to be denied WASH, health, education, dignity, and gender equity [8]. In Gujarat in India, 91% of girls reported staying away from flowing water during menstruation. In a study in South Asia, 20% of the women who had access to toilets stated that they refrained from using them during their periods, partly due to fear of staining the toilet. Menstruation is a natural process, but if not properly managed it can result in health problems. Researchers have suggested links between unhygienic menstrual hygiene management and urinary infections, RTIs, and other diseases [9].

If RTIs are left untreated or treatment is delayed, complications can result such as pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, cervical cancer, puerperal sepsis, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, neonatal blindness, premature membrane rupture, and low birth weight [10]. There is a paucity of relevant data on the overall prevalence of RTIs in community-based settings in Ethiopia, and the association between RTIs and menstruation hygiene management (MHM) and WASH factors has not been established. Therefore, this study aimed examined the prevalence of RTIs and associated factors among reproductive-age women in Dessie City, Ethiopia. The findings may contribute information towards narrowing this gap in the research.

Materials and methods

Study design and description of the study area

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dessie City from January to March 2019. Dessie is the capital of South Wollo Zone, located about 400 km from Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. The city is located at an altitude of 2,470 to 2,550 meters. The Dessie City Administrative Health Office estimated the population of Dessie in 2018/2019 was 223,639, of which 104,800 (46.86%) were males and 118,839 (53.14%) were females [11].

There are 16 kebeles in Dessie City, 10 urban and 6 rural. A kebele is the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia, consisting of about 5,000 people. This study was limited to three randomly selected urban kebeles (kebeles 02 [Salayish], 07 [Dawido], and 09 [Robit]). In 2018/2019, the city contained 52,009 households, 42,745 (82.19%) urban and 9264 (17.81%) rural. Of the 52,736 women in the reproductive-age group, 43,342 (82.2%) lived in the urban and 9,394 (17.8%) in the rural parts of Dessie City [11].

Source population, inclusion and exclusion criteria

The source population consisted of all women of reproductive age in the urban part of Dessie City. Women aged 15–49 years who menstruated during the three months prior to data collection were included. Women aged 15–49 who were pregnant and/or who had not menstruated in the three months prior to data collection were excluded.

Sample size determination

A single proportion sample size estimation formula [12] was used with the following assumptions:

n=(za/2)2*p(1p)d2

Zα/2 is the standard normal variable value at 95% CI (confidence interval) (α is 0.05 with 95%CI, Zα/2 = 1.96; an estimate of the prevalence (P) of RTI 50%, and 5% the margin of error (d). A design effect of 1.5 was used due to multistage sampling and a sample size correction formula was employed since the source population was less than 10,000 in the study area. A 10% non-response rate was used to obtain 602 as an adequate sample size.

Sampling technique and procedures

A two-stage sampling technique was used to select women of reproductive age. First, three kebeles were selected randomly out of ten kebeles. A sampling frame was prepared for a house-to-house survey of households in the selected three kebeles (kebeles 02, 07, and 09) by identifying a women of reproductive age. We found a total of 8,845 households containing 8,969 reproductive-age women. Proportion-to-size allocation was made to determine the sample size required from each selected kebele.

The sampling units were households having at least one woman of reproductive age. In the second stage of sampling, systematic random sampling with a fixed interval of 14 was used to select sampling unit households; the simple random lottery method was used for selecting the first household. When more than one reproductive-age women was present in a selected household, the lottery method was used to select the study participant.

Outcome measurement

The outcome variable of this study was RTI presence (yes) or absence (no) during the one year prior to data collection. Measurement of RTI was based on syndromic management of RTI, a method recommended by the World Health Organization for low-income and low-resource settings such as Ethiopia. Thus, the presence of RIT was presumed if one or more of the following signs occurred: vaginal discharge, itching/irritation or ulcers/lesions around the vulva, pain during urination and sexual intercourse, and lower abdominal and lower back pain [2].

Operational definitions

Menstruation hygiene management (MHM)

Use of clean material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period, use of soap and water for washing the body as required, and access to facilities for disposing of used menstrual management material [13]. MHM was assessed for the three months immediately prior to data collection.

History of RTI symptoms

The presence or absence of history of RTI was considered for the one-year period prior to three months before data collection.

Ulcers/lesions around vulva

Vesicular/non-vesicular, recurrent/non-recurrent, multiple/solitary ulcer on the labia, vagina, or rectum, with or without inguinal lymphadenopathy [2]. The presence or absence of ulcers/lesions around the vulva was assessed for the year prior to data collection.

Vaginal discharge syndrome

A change in the amount, color, and odor of the vaginal discharge [2]. The presence or absence of vaginal discharge syndrome for this study was assessed for the year prior to data collection.

Lower abdominal pain syndrome

Bilateral lower abdominal or pelvic pain or lower abdominal tenderness together with cervical excitation tenderness, or a tender pelvic mass together with fever, nausea, or vomiting [2] was assessed for the year prior to data collection.

Clean latrine

No fecal matter observed in or around the pit latrine, latrine properly swept during the data collection period [14].

Latrine utilization

Presence of functional latrine, safe disposal of child feces, no observable feces in the compound, and presence of at least one sign of latrine use (footpath to the latrine not covered by grass, the latrine is smelly, absence of spider webs in the squatting hole, presence of anal cleansing material, fresh feces in the squatting hole, and the slab is wet) [15].

WASH

The collective term for water, sanitation, and hygiene. Due to their interdependence, these three core issues are grouped together in this study. WASH variables used in this study have been defined in other studies [1618].

Data collection procedures and quality assurance

The data collection tool was a structured questionnaire adapted from similar studies. The questionnaire comprised socio-demographic variables of the study participants, WASH variables of the household, history of co-morbidity, behavioral variables, MHM practices of participants, and the outcome variable.

The questionnaire, originally developed in English, was translated into Amharic (local language) and back into English by language experts to ensure consistency. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and using a direct observation checklist. Six female midwives with BSc degrees and two female environmental health professionals with BSc degrees were employed as data collectors and supervisors, respectively.

Trained female midwives were employed to improve communication between study participants and data collectors and ensure the acquisition of reliable data about RITs and other independent variables. Data collectors and supervisors were trained by the principal investigator for two days on the objectives of the study, the content of the questionnaire, ethical issues, and approaches to be used during data collection.

Inter-observer reliability was ensured by providing clear definitions of WASH and events to be recorded, by training data collectors, and by providing feedback about discrepancies during daily supervisions. We re-interviewed 5% of the study participants, using a different interviewer, to check reliability of the information entered by different interviewers. The qualifications of the interviewers and the training they received reduced the likelihood for interviewer bias. We also pre-tested the questionnaire with 30 women of reproductive age (5% of the sample size) in one non-selected kebele (kebele 03 in Dessie City) before the actual data collection and made changes to the questionnaire where necessary for clarity. During administration of the survey, the collected data were checked daily by the principal investigator and supervisors for completeness, and houses providing incomplete data were revisited once to obtain further data.

Data management and analysis

The data were coded, entered into EpiData Version 3.1, and exported to SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Version 25.0 statistical software for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution and prevalence were computed. Principal component analysis was done to construct the household wealth index with the following considerations: communality value > 0.5, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value > 0.5, and eigen values greater than one [19]. Multicollinearity between independent variables was checked with the standard error of the coefficient with a cut-off point greater than 2 [20], which was not observed.

Associations between independent variables and RTI were determined using a binary logistic regression model. First, the bi-variate analysis was done and all independent variables having P-values ≤ 0.25 were retained for multivariable analysis. P-value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95%CI were considered as statistically significant and used to determine factors associated with RTI in the final model. Model fitness was checked using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test [20] to run logistic regression analysis with cut-off point P-value > 0.05.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University. After the purpose of the study was explained and before data collection, oral/verbal informed consent was obtained from the study participants. For study participants below 18 years of age, verbal consent was obtained from their parents/guardians. Participants’ privacy and the confidentiality of the information they gave were ensured at all levels; the interviews were conducted in a private place to ensure privacy and personal identifiers were not used. Participants who reported symptoms of RTI at the time of data collection were advised to obtain treatment at a health facility and necessary arrangements were made for them to do so with health extension workers.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

Data were collected from 602 reproductive-age women, 591 of whom completed the process (response rate of 98.17%). Of the study participants, 318(53.8%) were Muslims and 258(43.7%) were Orthodox Christians. Their ages ranged from 16 to 49 years with a median of 30 and interquartile range of 10. Only 388(65.65%) were married. About one-fourth of the study participants were found in the highest 117(19.8%) and lower 116(19.63) economic classes (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of the study participants in Dessie City, Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Variables Frequency RTI COR (95%CI) P-value
Yes No
n(%) n n
Age in years
    15–19 42(7.1) 10 32 2.96(1.24–7.05) 0.014
    20–34 371(62.8) 38 333 1.08(0.59–1.97) 0.800
    35–49 178(30.1) 17 161 1
Marital status
    Single 133(22.5) 29 104 2.42(0.68–8.55) 0.171
    Married 388(65.7) 23 365 0.55(0.15–1.94) 0.349
    Divorced 41(6.9) 10 31 2.80(0.70–11.24) 0.148
    Widowed 29(4.9) 3 26 1
Religion
    Orthodox Christianity 258(43.7) 23 235 0.19(0.14–2.99) 0.567
    Muslim 318(53.8) 37 281 0.26(0.20–4.30) 0.931
    Protestant 15(2.5) 5 10 1
Educational status*
    Illiterate 70(11.8) 7 63 1.17(0.42–3.22) 0.766
    Primary 160(27.1) 20 140 1.50(0.67–3.34) 0.321
    Secondary 246(41.6) 28 218 1.35(0.63–2.88) 0.440
    Above secondary 115(19.5) 10 105 1
Number of parity
    Three to five 196(33.2) 19 177 0.36 (0.19–0.69) 0.002
    One to two 277(46.9) 19 258 0.25(0.13–0.47) < 0.001
    None 118(19.9) 27 91 1
Wealth index
    Lower 116(19.6) 8 108 0.34(0.14–0.80) 0.014
    Second 120(20.3) 6 114 0.24(0.09–0.62) 0.003
    Middle 119(20.1) 13 106 0.56(0.27–1.18) 0.128
    Fourth 119(20.1) 17 102 0.76(0.38–1.53) 0.445
    Highest 117(19.8) 21 96 1

1reference category.

*illiterate not attended both formal and informal education, primary education means Grade 1–8; secondary education Grade 9–12, and above secondary education means that diploma, degree, masters and others.

Prevalence of reproductive tract infections

The prevalence of RTI among reproductive-age women was 11%(95%CI:8.5–13.7%). Among symptomatic women, the symptoms most commonly reported were burning micturition (9.1%) and vaginal discharge (6.1%). Lower abdominal pain (1.4%) and lower back pain (0.8%) were the least frequently reported symptoms (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Self-reported symptom-based prevalence of RTI among reproductive-age women in Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Fig 1

Water, sanitation, and hygiene-related factors

A latrine was present in all study households; 443(75.0%) households had traditional pit latrines, 78(13.2%) had pour-flush latrines, and 70(11.8%) had ventilated improved pit latrines. The distance between latrine and house ranged from 0 to 30m with a median of 6m and an interquartile range of 5m. The majority of the respondents 527(89.2%) did not meet the basic access requirement of 20 liters water per capita per day. The amount of water consumed per capita per day ranged from 3 to 30 liters with a median of 10 and an interquartile range of 7 (Table 2).

Table 2. Water, sanitation, and hygiene-related characteristics among the study participants in Dessie City, Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Variables Frequency RTI COR (95%CI) P-value
Yes No
n(%) n n
Cleanliness of latrine used
    Not clean 202(34.2) 46 156 5.74(3.26–10.12) < 0.001
    Clean 389(65.8) 19 370 1
Distance of latrine from the house
    < 15 meters 547(92.5) 60 487 0.96(0.77–42.09) 0.088
    15–30 meters 44(74.5) 5 39 1
Amount of water used per capita per day
    <20 litters 527(89.2) 60 467 1.51(1.19–23.88) 0.048
    ≥20 litters 64(10.8) 5 59 1
Availability of water near latrine/toilet for hand washing
    No 498(84.3) 63 435 6.59(1.58–27.42) 0.010
    Yes 93(15.7) 2 91 1
Water source
    Public stand pipe 12(2.0) 5 7 5.85(0.35–7.65)
    House/yard connected to tap water 579(98.0) 63 516 1 0.530
Hand washing with soap before touching the genital area during menstruation
    No 390(66.0) 59 331 5.79(2.46–13.67) < 0.001
    Yes 201(34.0) 6 195 1

1reference category.

History of co-morbidities

Of the total respondents, 38(6.4%) reported at least one symptom of RTI in the year prior to three months before data collection. Sixty-two (10.5%) of the study participants reported having had an abortion in the year prior to data collection (Table 3).

Table 3. History of comorbidities among reproductive age women in Dessie City, Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Variables Frequency RTI COR (95%CI) P-value
Yes No
n(%) n n
History of abortion in year prior to data collection
    Yes 62(10.5) 12 50 2.16(1.08–4.30) 0.029
    No 529(89.5) 53 476 1
History of RTI symptoms in year prior to three months before data collection
    Yes 38(6.4) 18 20 9.69(4.80–19.58) < 0.001
    No 553(93.6) 47 506 1

1reference category.

Behavioral factors

The majority (95.1%) of the study participants did not have multiple sexual partners during the previous year and 97.8% practiced sexual intercourse during menstruation. The bivariate analysis showed that those respondents who had multiple sexual partners in the year before data collection were at a 12.89 times higher risk for developing RTI (COR: 12.89; 95%CI:5.86–28.34) compared to those who did not have multiple partners (Table 4).

Table 4. Characteristics of behavioral factors among reproductive age women in Dessie City, Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Variables Frequency RTI COR (95%CI) P-value
Yes No
n(%) n n
Multiple sexual partners during the last year
    Yes 29(4.9) 16 13 12.89 (5.86–28.34) < 0.001*
    No 562(95.1) 49 513 1
Sexual intercourse during menstruation
    Yes 13(2.2) 4 9 3.77(1.13–12.60) 0.031*
    No 578(97.8) 61 517 1
Use of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD)
    Yes 17(2.9) 2 15 1.08(0.24–4.84) 0.918
    No 574(97.1) 63 511 1

1reference category.

Menstrual hygiene management practices

The majority of respondents 586(99.2%) used blood-absorbent material during menstruation. The most common type of blood-absorbent material used was a sanitary pad 497(84.8%) followed by cloth 89(15.2%). Of the study subjects who used blood-absorbent material, 537(91.6%) changed their blood-absorbent material every day and 462(78.8%) changed the blood-absorbent material two or more times per day during menstruation (Table 5).

Table 5. Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practices among reproductive age women in Dessie City, Ethiopia, January to March 2019.

Variables Frequency RTI COR (95%CI) P-value
Yes No
n(%) n n
Nature of absorbent material used during menstruation
    Cloth 89(15.2) 9 80 0.89(0.42–1.86) 0.749
    Sanitary pad/napki 497(84.8) 56 441 1
Where do you put your menstruation pad/cloth
    I reuse it 68(11.6) 3 65 0.34(0.10–1.11) 0.075
    I dispose of it 518(88.4) 62 456 1
Frequency of changing absorbent material during menstruation
    Alternate days 49(8.4) 18 31 6.05(3.15–11.64) <0.001
    Every day 537(91.6) 47 490 1
Frequency of changing absorbent material per day during menstruation
    Once and below 124(21.2) 44 80 11.55(6.52–20.46) <0.001
    Twice or more 462(78.8) 21 441 1
Did you take all body bath during menstruation
    No 467(79.0) 58 409 2.37(1.05–5.33) 0.037
    Yes 124(21.0) 7 117 1
Days of taking all body bath during menstruation
    Not washing every day 477(80.7) 59 418 2.54(1.07–6.04) 0.035
    Washing every day 114(19.3) 6 108 1
Do you wash the genital area every day during menstruation
    No 62(10.5) 25 37 8.26(4.53–15.07) < 0.001
    Yes 529(89.5) 40 489 1
Frequency of washing the genital area per day during menstruation
    Once 33(5.6) 13 20 6.33(2.98–13.45) < 0.001
    Twice or more 558(94.4) 52 506 1
What do you use to wash the genital area
    Water only 499(94.3) 35 464 1.88(0.33–18.54) 0.383
    Water and soap 30(5.7) 5 25 1

Multivariable logistic regression analysis

In the multivariable analysis, socio-demographic factors were not significantly associated with RTI. Of the WASH factors, using unclean latrines (AOR: 4.20; 95%CI:2.00–8.80) and not washing hands with soap before touching the genital area (AOR: 3.94; 95%CI:1.49–10.45) were significantly associated with RTI. Of the history of co-morbidity factors, only having history of RTI symptoms in the year preceding three months before data collection was significantly associated with RTI (AOR: 5.88; 95%CI:2.30–14.98). Regarding behavioral factors, having multiple sexual partners before the study was significantly associated with RTI (AOR: 4.46; 95%CI:1.59–12.53) (Table 6).

Table 6. Factors associated with RTIs among reproductive age women from multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Variable COR (95%CI) AOR (95%CI)
Cleanliness of latrine used
    Not clean 5.74(3.26–10.12) 4.20(2.00–8.80)
    Clean 1 1
Hand washing with soap before touching the genital area
    No 5.79(2.46–13.67) 3.94(1.49–10.45)
    Yes 1 1
History of RTI symptoms in year prior to three months before data collection
    Yes 9.69(4.80–19.58) 5.88(2.30–14.98)
    No 1 1
Having multiple sexual partners in the past year
    Yes 12.89(5.86–28.34) 4.46(1.59–12.53)
    No 1 1
Frequency of changing absorbent material per day during menstruation
    Once 11.55(6.52–20.46) 8.99(4.51–17.92)
    Twice and above 1 1
Frequency of washing the genital area per day during menstruation
    Once 6.33(2.98–13.45) 5.76(2.07–16.05)
    Twice or more 1 1

1reference category.

Regarding factors related to MHM, the odds of reproductive-age women developing RTI were 8.99 times higher (AOR: 8.99; 95%CI:4.51–17.92) in those who changed absorbent material only once per day than in those who changed absorbent material two or more times per day during menstruation. The odds of developing RTI were 5.76 times higher (AOR: 5.76; 95%CI:2.07–16.05) for women who washed the genital area once per day than for women who washed the genital area two or more times per day during menstruation (Table 6).

Discussion

Our study used a community-based cross-sectional design to estimate the self-reported prevalence of RTI and associated factors among reproductive-age women (15–49 years) in Dessie City. Results show the prevalence of RTI during the year prior to the survey was 11.0%(95%CI:8.5–13.7%). We found that using unclean latrines, not washing hands with soap before touching the genital area, having had symptoms of RTI in the last year, having multiple sexual partners in the previous year, changing blood-absorbent material only once per day, and washing the genital area only once per day during menstruation were significantly associated with RTI.

Our finding of the 11% prevalence of RTI was similar to that of a study in Kerala, India (11.8%) [21]. However, several studies in other geographic areas with similar populations have reported a higher prevalence of RTI than the figure in our study. For instance, studies placed the prevalence of RTI in Mohali, Punjab, at 45% [22]; in Bangalore City at 29.15% [23]; in a rural area of Tamil Nadu at 55.5% [24]; in a rural area of Surendranagar District at 56.5% [25]; in an urban slum in Bidar, Karnataka, at 36.1% [26]; in Etawah District, Uttar Pradesh, at 46.76% [27]; and in an urban slum of northeast Delhi, India, at 43.9% [28]. The relatively low prevalence of RTI in our study might be due to the implementation of adolescent and reproductive health and STI prevention and control programs in urban areas of Ethiopia.

In this study, the type of blood-absorbent material used during menstruation was not significantly associated with the development of RTI. A similar study conducted in an urban slum of northeast Delhi, India, found prevalence of RTI significantly associated with using cloth rather than sanitary napkins during menses [28]. A worldwide systematic review study in different African countries found between 18% and 44% of women using menstrual pads [29]. The spread of covid-19 has been associated with increasing unavailability of sanitary napkins for many African women due to hording, calling for regulation of their distribution at the retail level [30].

Our study indicates that frequent changing of blood-absorbent material daily during menstruation was protective against the development of RTI. Similarly, in a study conducted in urban slums in India, participants who changed sanitary pads/cloths frequently and maintained good hygiene were at lower risk of developing RTIs [31]. Das et al.[32] reported that Indian women who used disposable absorbent pads were less likely to develop urogenital infections tan women using reusable pads, a relationship we did not examine in our study.

In this study, use of unclean latrines was associated with RTI development. The literature reports that poor sanitation may facilitate transmission where genital contact is made with infected genital fluids on the latrine toilet seat [33]. A review of the relationship between WASH and maternal and reproductive health indicated that health outcomes are broad and overlapping and that more research is needed to assess the effects of individual WASH exposures [34].

Our study also demonstrated that not washing hands with soap before touching the genital area was significantly associated with RTI and a significant predictor of RTI. Adequate hand washing with soap significantly reduces microorganism contamination of hands, which is a potential source of microbes in the vaginal area [35]. A study in rural Kwa-Zulu Natal reported that genital touching of women was also associated with bacterial vaginosis but not with chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, trichomoniasis, and herpes simplex virus-2 [36]. The authors attributed this result to increased vaginal PH resulting from use of soap that enhances lactobacilli survival in the vagina. Another possible reason may be introduction of microbes into the vagina along with ash or soil.

Consistent with our findings, a study in Odisha, India, found that RTI symptoms were more common among women who did not wash their hands versus women who washed their hands with soap or ash/soil/mud after defecation [37]. In our study in Addis Ababa slums, only 17.1% mothers of under-five children washed their hands using soap after defecation [18].

Our study also indicated that frequent washing of the genital area each day during menstruation is protective against the development of RTI among reproductive-age women. A study conducted in Dehradun, India, reported an association between RTI and poor menstrual hygiene as measured by washing the genitalia less often than twice per day during menstruation [38]. We also found that a history of RTI symptoms in the year before data collection was significantly associated with the development of RTI. A similar study in an urban training health center of a tertiary care hospital in India showed that RTI was significantly associated with a history of RTIs in the previous year [21].

History of abortion in the year prior to data collection was not found to be significantly associated with risk of RTI in our study. However, a similar study among women in urban slums of India showed that participants who had a history of abortion had higher odds of RTI symptoms than those who had no history of abortion [31]. The difference in our finding might be due to the implementation of clean, safe, and standard procedures during an abortion. Inadequate information on reproductive health impacts of abortion and the persisting high rate of unintended pregnancies (121 million annually between 2015 and 2019) ending in abortion worldwide indicates the need for further research [39].

One of the limitations of this study is that no diagnostic tests were used to validate the self-reported prevalence of RTIs; our estimates were based on syndromic management of curable sexually transmitted infections and other RTIs, a method recommended by the World Health Organization for low-resource settings [2, 40]. However, in the absence of a laboratory diagnostic to accompany the analysis reported, this work may greatly underestimate or overestimate RTI prevalence and the true burden of RTIs. Another limitation of this cross-sectional study is the difficulty of establishing causal relationships between the dependent and independent variables. Furthermore, the results of this study may not be representative of the occurrence and underlying factors of RTIs at the national level because it was conducted only in Dessie City.

One strength of this paper is that WASH variables (presence of latrine, cleanliness of latrine, utilization of latrine, and distance of latrine from house) were observed and/or measured by data collectors to minimize self-reporting bias. Another strength is the fact that, unlike many previous studies of WASH interventions that focused on evaluating the impact of the variables on infectious diseases in children, this study examined gender-specific outcome measures of RTI at the community level.

Implications for practice and/or policy

In developing countries including Ethiopia, low access to water supply, lack of adequate sanitation facilities, and low hygiene levels hinder proper MHM among reproductive-age women. A combination of inadequate WASH facilities, and poor MHM practices contribute to RTIs among reproductive-age women. Therefore, the findings of this study have implication for designing a women’s health policy that focuses on availability of WASH facilities and health promotion in the improvement of MHM at the community level. This will require the development of integrated programs at the regional and community levels, where kebeles can play a major role in implementing these programs.

Conclusions

The self-reported prevalence of RTI was 11.0% among reproductive-age women who were menstruating during the three months prior to data collection. We conclude that the following factors are associated with RTI: using unclean latrines/toilets, not washing hands with soap before touching the genital area, symptoms of RTI in the year prior to three months before the study period, having multiple sexual partners in the previous year, changing of blood-absorbent material only once per day during menstruation, and washing of the genital area only once per day during menstruation. Public health intervention measures need to consider these modifiable risk factors in order to reduce and prevent RTIs in Dessie City. Researchers should determine the prevalence of RTIs by including laboratory analysis to confirm RTI and identify the etiologic agents. Future research should examine the generalizability of these findings in other contexts and examine the causal relationships between sanitation infrastructure, hygiene practices, and women’s health.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

S2 File

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dessie City Administration Health Office officials and health extension workers for their collaboration and valuable information. We also want to thank data collectors, supervisors, and study participants for their participation and valuable information.

Abbreviations

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

CI

confidence interval

COR

crude odds ratio

MHM

menstruation hygiene management

RTI

reproductive tract infection

STI

sexually transmitted infection

WASH

water, sanitation and hygiene

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Wollo University Funded this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Patel D, Burnett N, Curtis K, Hillis SD, Marchbanks P. Reproductive tract infections. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. Sexually transmitted and other reproductive tract infections. A guide to essential practice. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CSA, PAI. Centre for the Study of Adolescence (CSA) and Population Action International (PAI). A measure of commitment. Women’s sexual and reproductive risk index for sub- Saharan Africa. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sabarwal S, Santhya K. Treatment-seeking for symptoms of reproductive tract infections among young women in India. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(2):90–8. 10.1363/3809012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Balamurugan SS, Bendigeri N. Community-based study of reproductive tract infections among women of the reproductive age group in the urban health training centre area in Hubli, Karnataka. Indian J Community Med: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine. 2012;37(1):34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bitew A, Abebaw Y, Bekele D, Mihret A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors among women complaining of genital tract infection. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017(ID 4919404): 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.EPHI. The Ethiopian Public Health Institue (EPHI). Report on the sentinel surveillance of sexually transmitted infections based on syndromic case reporting (July 2014—June 2015). Federal Ministry of Health (MOH), Addis Ababa: 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.UNICEF. Annual results report 2015. Water, sanitation and hygiene. 2015.
  • 9.House S, Mahon T, Cavill S. Menstrual hygiene matters: A resource for improving menstrual hygiene around the world. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(41):257–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WHO. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). 10.1109/LPT.2009.2019620 2016. [DOI]
  • 11.DCA. Dessie City Administration Health Office 2018/19 Annual Report. Dessie. Ethiopia 2018.
  • 12.Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in observational epidemiology: Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.UNICEF. WaSH in schools empowers girls education. Proceedings of the menstrual hygiene management in schools virtual conference 2014.
  • 14.Chanie T, Ketema K. Latrine utilization and associated factors in rural community of Aneded district, North West Ethiopia. J Community Med Heath Edu. 2016;6(5):2–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yimam YT, Gelaye KA, Chercos DH. Latrine utilization and associated factors among people living in rural areas of Denbia district, Northwest Ethiopia, 2013, a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18(334). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adane M, Mengistie B, Kloos H, Medhin G, Mulat W. Sanitation facilities, hygienic conditions, and prevalence of acute diarrhea among under-five children in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Baseline survey of a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182783 10.1371/journal.pone.0182783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adane M, Mengistie B, Medhin G, Kloos H, Mulat W. Piped water supply interruptions and acute diarrhea among under-five children in Addis Ababa slums, Ethiopia: A matched case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181516 10.1371/journal.pone.0181516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adane M, Mengistie B, Mulat W, Medhin G, Kloos H. The most important recommended times of hand washing with soap and water in preventing the occurrence of acute diarrhea among children under five years of age in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Community Health. 2018;43(2):400–5. 10.1007/s10900-017-0437-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 2006:460–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hosmer J, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramesh J, Joseph J, V. D. M. Reproductive tract infections: A self-reported community based study in urban training health centre area of a tertiary care hospital in Kottayam, Kerala, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(1):129–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mamta KN, Kaur N. Reproductive tract infections: Prevalence and health seeking behaviour among women of reproductive age group. Int J Sci Res. 2014;3(4):138–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ratnaprabha GT, Sulekha T, Johnson A, Ramesh N. A study of prevalence and awareness of reproductive tract infections among women aged 15–49 years in select underprivileged areas of Bangalore city, Karnataka. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2011;4(12):1691–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kamini B, V S. A study on prevalence of reproductive tract infections among women in a rural area of Tamil Nadu. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(1):336–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thekdi KP, Patel K, Patel NK, Thekdi PI. A cross sectional study on the prevalence of reproductive tract infections amongst married women in the rural area of Surendranagar district. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2(1):215–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dilip SR, Ashok DS, Dhananjay BN, Pallavi MK. Prevalence of reproductive tract infections and sexually transmitted infections among married women in the reproductive age group in urban slum of Bidar, Karnataka. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(11):4182–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rani V, Dixit AM, Kumar S, Singh NP, Jain PK, Peeyush K. Reproductive morbidity profile among ever married women (15–44) years of rural Etawah District, Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study. Community Med. 2015;7(1):35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bhilwar M, Lal P, Sharma N, Bhalla P, Kumar A. Prevalence of reproductive tract infections and their determinants in married women residing in an urban slum of North-East Delhi, India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S29–S34. 10.4103/0976-9668.166059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sumpter C, Torondel B. A systematic review of the health and social effects of menstrual hygiene management. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62004 10.1371/journal.pone.0062004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ajari EE. Why menstrual health and wellbeing promotion should not be Sidelined in Africa’s response to COVID-19. Europ J Environm Public Health. 2020;4(2):em0045. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pandit M, Nagarkar A. Determinants of reproductive tract infections among women in urban slums of India. Women's Reproductive Health. 2017;4(2):106–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Das P, Baker KK, Dutta A, Swain T, Sahoo S, Das BS, et al. Menstrual hygiene practices, WASH access and the risk of urogenital infection in women from Odisha, India. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130777 10.1371/journal.pone.0130777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Muual D, Geubbels E. Epidemiology of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2006;18(4):176–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Campbell OM, Benova L, Gon G, Afsana K, Cumming O. Getting the basic rights–the role of water, sanitation and hygiene in maternal and reproductive health: A conceptual framework. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20(3):252–67. 10.1111/tmi.12439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.GHP. Global Handwashing Partnership. The State of Handwashing in 2017: Annual Research Summary. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Francis SC, Mthiyane TN, Baisley K, Mchunu SL, Ferguson JB, Smit T, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among young people in South Africa: A nested survey in a health and demographic surveillance site. PLoS Med. 2018;15(2):e1002512 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baker KK, Padhi B, Torondel B, Das P, Dutta A, Sahoo KC, et al. From menarche to menopause: A population-based assessment of water, sanitation, and hygiene risk factors for reproductive tract infection symptoms over life stages in rural girls and women in India. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0188234 10.1371/journal.pone.0188234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Juyal R, Kandpal S, Semwal J. Menstrual hygiene and reproductive morbidity in adolescent girls in Dehradun, India. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2014;13(2):170–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. The Lancet Glob Health. 2020;https://doi:org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.WHO. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2001. 10.1136/sti.77.2.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Hans-Uwe Dahms

23 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-19169

Menstrual Hygiene Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Remains a Public Health Problem for Women’s in Urbans of South Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Adane (PhD),

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 06 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hans-Uwe Dahms, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

3.We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [1] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

There are some issues that need to be addressed for a REVISED VERSION:

1- In Table 1 in the age section, 20-year-olds were divided into two parts (15 to 20 and 20 to 34 years old). Why?

2- What is the meaning of No formal education in Table 1? Do you mean illiterate people or people who have been educated at home?

3- What is meant by Above secondary? Does it mean university education? Or people with a PhD degree? Please write a note.

4- In Table 2 for Distance of latrine from the

house Written 15> and 15-30, Is 15 in the first category or the second?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This article is valuable and can be published, but there are some issues that need to be addressed:

1- In Table 1 in the age section, 20-year-olds were divided into two parts (15 to 20 and 20 to 34 years old). Why?

2- What is the meaning of No formal education in Table 1? Do you mean illiterate people or people who have been educated at home?

3- What is meant by Above secondary? Does it mean university education? Or people with a PhD degree? Please write a note.

4- In Table 2 for Distance of latrine from the

house Written 15> and 15-30, Is 15 in the first category or the second?

Reviewer #2: This manuscript discusses a much needed work on Menstrual Hygiene Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Remains a Public Health Problem for Women’s in Urbans of South Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia with some basic results. The paper is suitable for publication with following corrections:

1. Add some of the most important quantitative results to the Abstract.

2. In Discussion and conclusion segment, authors can include the limitations of this study and more ideas and suggestions for prevention and control. The discussion section should be detailed with citation of all the recent references. Add more information about the significance and importance of this study.

3. A clear distinction of usage of the statistical tests has to be mentioned.

4. Authors should carefully review the final resolution of the figures prior to publication for better understanding of results.

5. Cite the source of future investigations in this study.

6. Rectify grammatical errors to reach up to international standards.

7. Ensure that the references and whole manuscript is as per journal format. Make certain that all the tables and figure citations are also in the standard format.

8.The authors are suggested to improve the quality of the language usage and correct grammatical errors.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237696.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Jul 2020

Response to reviewers

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: Thank you for this remark. We re-formatted the revised manuscript using the PLoS ONE format guidelines. The whole content of the manuscript, including the abstract, introduction, methods, discussion and reference are formatted using the guidelines (please see the revised version for each section).

2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

Response: We provided the questionnaire in English version and original language as supporting information S I and S II, respectively.

3. We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

Response: The figure was removed in our submission.

Reviewer #1

This article is valuable and can be published, but there are some issues that need to be addressed:

Response: Thank you for the positive comments on our paper. Your concerns are addressed below.

1- In Table 1 in the age section, 20-year-olds were divided into two parts (15 to 20 and 20 to 34 years old). Why?

Response: Thank you very much for finding out such errors. The correct grouping is 15 to 19 (See Table 1).

2- What is the meaning of No formal education in Table 1? Do you mean illiterate people or people who have been educated at home?

Response: Sorry for the confusion. We mean they are illiterate. Illiterate not attended both formal and informal education (See Table 1).

3- What is meant by above secondary? Does it mean university education? Or people with a PhD degree? Please write a note

Response: Primary education means Grade 1-8; secondary education Grade 9-12, and above secondary education means that diploma, degree, masters and others.

4- In Table 2 for Distance of latrine from the house Written 15> and 15-30, Is 15 in the first category or the second?

Response: 15 is the second category since for the first category we used less than 15.

Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2: This manuscript discusses a much needed work on Menstrual Hygiene Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Remains a Public Health Problem for Women’s in Urbans of South Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia with some basic results. The paper is suitable for publication with following corrections:

Response: Thank you very much for the positive reflection of our paper. Corrections were made as follows.

1. Add some of the most important quantitative results to the Abstract.

Response: We added some of the main quantitative results to the Abstract (See the result section of the abstract in lines 37 to 44.

2. In discussion and conclusion segment, authors can include the limitations of this study and more ideas and suggestions for prevention and control. The discussion section should be detailed with citation of all the recent references. Add more information about the significance and importance of this study.

Response: Thank you for this pertinent comments. The discussion and conclusion section were revised (see the revised version in lines 363 to 367; 473-375; 379-382; 387-393; 397-399 and 416-419. See also about the conclusion in lines 462 to 464. The significance of the study in practice/policy implications were further explained (See lines 441 to 449.

3. A clear distinction of usage of the statistical tests has to be mentioned.

Response: The statistical testes are put in a clear way. See the revised lines Table 6.

4. Authors should carefully review the final resolution of the figures prior to publication for better understanding of results.

Response: Figures 1 to 3 were deleted since they are not important. But Figure 4 during the revision became figure 1 and was updated for clarity (See figure 1).

5. Cite the source of future investigations in this study.

Response: The recommendations for future investigations are the author’s idea and therefore need no source.

6. Rectify grammatical errors to reach up to international standards.

Response: We edited the grammatical errors (see the revised version).

7. Ensure that the references and whole manuscript is as per journal format. Make certain that all the tables and figure citations are also in the standard format.

Response: We formatted them as per the journal guidelines.

8.The authors are suggested to improve the quality of the language usage and correct grammatical errors.

Response: We edited language usage and grammatical errors.

Decision Letter 1

Hans-Uwe Dahms

3 Aug 2020

Does menstrual hygiene management and water, sanitation, and hygiene predictors for reproductive tract infections among reproductive age Women in urban Areas of Ethiopia?

PONE-D-20-19169R1

Dear Dr. Adane (PhD),

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Hans-Uwe Dahms, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

This MS has now be revised to an extend that it becomes acceptable.

Reviewers' comments:    Accept

Acceptance letter

Hans-Uwe Dahms

5 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-19169R1

Does menstrual hygiene management and water, sanitation, and hygiene predictors for reproductive tract infections among reproductive age Women in urban Areas of Ethiopia?

Dear Dr. Adane (PhD):

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Hans-Uwe Dahms

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    S2 File

    (DOCX)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES