Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Aug 24;15(8):e0237705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237705

Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function

Mahesh R Pillai 1,¤, K Todd Keylock 2, Howard C Cromwell 3, Lee A Meserve 1,*
Editor: Hans-Joachim Lehmler4
PMCID: PMC7444807  PMID: 32833973

Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are environmental pollutants and endocrine disruptors, harmfully affecting reproductive, endocrine, neurological and immunological systems. This broad influence has implications for processes such as wound healing, which is modulated by the immunological response of the body. Conversely, while PCBs can be linked to diminished wound healing, outside of PCB pollution systems, exercise has been shown to accelerate wound healing. However, the potential for moderate intensity exercise to modulate or offset the harmful effects of a toxin like PCB are yet unknown. A key aim of the present study was to examine how PCB exposure at different doses (0, 100, 500, 1000 ppm i.p.) altered wound healing in exercised versus non-exercised subgroups of mice. We examined PCB effects on immune function in more depth by analyzing the concentrations of cytokines, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in these wounds inflicted by punch biopsy. Mice were euthanized at Day 3 or Day 5 after PCB injection (n = 3–6) and skin excised from the wound area was homogenized and analyzed for cytokine content. Results revealed that wound healing was not signficantly impacted by either PCB exposure or exercise, but there were patterns of delays in healing that depended on PCB dose. Changes in cytokines were also observed and depended on PCB dose and exercise experience. For example, IL-1β concentrations in Day 5 mice without PCB administration were 33% less in exercised mice than mice not exercised. However, IL-1β concentrations in Day 3 mice administered 100 ppm were 130% greater in exercised mice than not exercisedmice. Changes in the other measured cytokines varied with mainly depressions at lesser PCB doses and elevations at higher doses. Exercise had diverse effects on cytokine levels, but increased cytokine levels in the two greater doses. Explanations for these diverse effects include the use of young animals with more rapid wound healing rates less affected by toxin exposure, as well as PCB-mediated compensatory effects at specific doses which could actually enhance immune function. Future work should examine these interactions in more detail across a developmental time span. Understanding how manipulating the effects of exposure to environemntal contaminants using behavioral modification could be very useful in certain high risk populations or exposed individuals.

Introduction

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) are environmental contaminants that were manufactured and used in large quantities for over 40 years because of their wide range of applications. However, eventually the harmful effects of these chemicals were observed and their commercial production and use has been prohibited in the US since the 1970s [1]. Aroclor 1254, which was administered to mice in the present study is a mixture of PCB congeners with 54% chlorination and was widely manufactured and released into the environment [2]. Because of their vurtually indestructible nature, PCBs remain in the environment and are known endocrine disruptors [3]. PCB exposure has been shown to cause carcinogenecity, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity and immunological effects [46]. The majority of studies indicate that PCB exposure leads to immunosuppression in mice and humans, however some studies have shown an increase in immunological response [79]. Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) has been shown to have immunotoxic effect and to impair the functioning of several immune responsive cells [10,11]. Previous studies have revealed that PCB can hamper wound healing [12,13]. However, these earlier studies were done using an invertebrate model (e.g., earthworms) with the PCB absorbance through the skin, and the wound sizes were measured only at 24 hours after wound creation. We expanded the present study by examining a well-established mouse model and extending the time duration of the wound healing analysis.

The present study expanded in another novel way by exploring the impact of exercise on immune function in animal subjects exposed to PCB. Researchers are slowly coming to a consensus that physical activity produces a U-shaped response curve, with both no and extreme physical activity having deleterious effects, whereas moderate physical activity has beneficial effects on both overall health and immune system function [14]. Moderate intensity exercise has been shown to provide beneficial effects, retarding development of various chronic conditions like cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis and chronic inflammation and it also reducing the progression of these diseases and certain neoplasms if they are already present [15,16]. The production of greater concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines as a result of exercise and this production has been demonstrated and this is essential for the positive effects of exercise [17]. The effect of exercise has also been studied in older mice in which the immune function is suboptimal resulting in greater susceptibility to and delayed recovery from infection. Older animals also have also been found to have delayed wound healing. Moderate intensity exercise in these animals improved wound healing rates. It also reduced the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the wound tissue of these animals [18,19].

The first aim of the present study was to determine whether PCB exposure impairs wound healing and if exercise can reduce some of the negative PCB effects and improve wound healing. To examine the relationship between PCB exposure and exercise in more detail, we measured the concentrations of various cytokines in wound tissue of mice moderately exercised or not exercised, with or without PCB exposure. Various immune responsive cells and the cytokines released by them play an important part in the inflammatory phase of wound healing by not only recruiting other immune cells, but also in the reepithelization process [20]. Previous studies have shown that excessive inflammation with the presence of increased pro-inflammatory cytokines can delay wound healing, especially in aged animals [21,22]; and that immunologically suppressed mice lacking macrophages and neutrophils experience greater rates of wound healing [23]. Furthermore, it has been shown that exercise improves wound healing rate in obese and aged mice [24]. The concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, KC and MCP-1 have been observed to decrease in aged mice after exercise and these findings correlated with more rapid wound healing rates in these animals. However, this study did not find significant positive effects of exercise on wound healing in younger mice [19]. In an evolutionarily less complex species, PCB administration in earthworms has impaired wound healing and increased allograft rejection [12,13]. Additionally, in vitro studies have found PCB to cause enhanced stimulation of neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species [25]. However, the function of human and mouse macrophages and mouse splenocytes has been shown to be impaired by PCB administration [2628]. No previous studies have determined the amounts of cytokines in wound tissue of animals administered PCB. The cytokine data from the present study will give us a novel insight into whether exercise can modulate PCB induced modification of cytokine concentrations and thus negating some of the immunotoxic effects of PCB.

Materials and methods

Animal care

Female C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks of age) were obtained from Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN and housed in the Bowling Green State University (BGSU) animal facility. All the animal studies were conducted as approved by the BGSU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol no. 10–013. The mice were individually housed in shoe box cages and maintained on a reverse light-dark cycle. They were provided food (Teklad Mouse Breeder Diet 8626, Envigo, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum, and their body weights were recorded daily. After PCB exposure, exercise regimen and wound generation, the animals were frequently monitored for evidence of distress (poor grooming, frantic appearance, poor coat condition, aversion to handling and wound infection). No signs of distress were observed in animals in this study. At the end of testing, animals were euthanized by rapid CO2 inhalation followed by decapitation with a guillotine.

PCB exposure

All the animals were given 2 weeks to acclimatize to the animal facility before the study began. All the animals in the present study (both not exercised & exercised groups) were administered PCB (Arochlor 1254; Accustandard Inc. New Haven CT, USA) dissolved in corn oil via intraperitoneal injection at a volume of 10 μl/g body weight. PCB doses administered were 0 (PCB 0), 100 (PCB 100), 500 (PCB 500) or 1000 (PCB 1000) μg/g. Previous studies have used similar PCB dosage [29] and intraperitoneal injections [30]. Following acclimatization, the animals in the group not exercised were housed in the animal facility for 3 weeks without exercise and PCB injection was administered 2 days after this 3-week period without exercise was over. Following acclimatization, the animals in the exercised group began moderate exercise for a 3-week period, 2 days after completion of the exercise period they were administered PCB.

Exercise regimen

The animals not exercised remained in cages without exercise during the 3-week period. The carts holding the cages of these animals were tethered to the table containing the motorized treadmill using large metal clamps, so that these no exercise animals not exercised were exposed to the same sounds and vibrations as the animals in the exercise group. The animals in the exercised group were exercised by running on a motorized treadmill (Jog-A-Dog model DC6 1H.P.) which was adapted with individual lanes for mice. This running was done for 30 minutes daily, five days a week for 3 weeks and consisted of moderate intensity running at 10–12 m/min with a 6% incline. These exercise regimens were carried out at the beginning of the active period of these animals (0700–0900 as they are on a reverse light-dark cycle). Previous studies have shown that this intensity of exercise effectively alters immune function [19].

Wound creation and wound size measurement

This procedure was carried out in the animals used in Aim I (Table 1) of the study. Wounds were made two days following PCB exposure. Mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane (Isoflo®) through a cone mask in 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 2–3 L/min during wound creation. Mice were then administered 0.05 μg/g of analgesic Buprenex (Buprenorphine hydrochloride, 0.3 mg/ml, Reckitt Benckiser, Healthcare (UK) Ltd., Hull, England). A similar dose of Buprenex was administered twice daily for 2 days post wounding. A Wahl Peanut Hair Trimmer (Sterling, IL) was used without guides to remove the hair over an area on the upper back, a location inaccessible to the animal, for the creation of wounds. The shaved area was then cleaned with Betadine and 70% ethanol. Wounds were made using a 3.5 mm sterile disposable punch biopsy instrument (Robbins Instruments, Chatham, NJ) to create one full thickness dermal punch resulting in two wounds. A Canon EOS Rebel XTi camera was used to photograph the wound at the same time daily until the wounds were reduced to 10% of original size or for two weeks after the wounds were made, whichever came first. Image J software (version 1.41o, NIH) was used to analyze the wound and compare it to the reference wound, thus allowing comparison between rates of wound healing.

Table 1. Detailed distribution of the mice used for wound healing study.

Number of Animals
PCB doses (μg/g) No Exercise Exercise
Wound Healing 0 6 6
100 6 6
500 6 6
1000 6 6
Total 24 24

Euthanasia

The animals were euthanized by rapid CO2 asphyxiation followed by decapitation with a guillotine after the wound size reached 10% of the original wound or two weeks post wounding, whichever came first. A 6.0 mm punch biopsy instrument was used to harvest the wound and the surrounding tissue.

Wound cytokine analysis

IL-1, IL-6, keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor- α (TNF-α) protein concentrations in wound tissue (Table 2) were determined using a Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine 23-plex Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Philadelphia, PA).

Table 2. Detailed distribution of the mice for cytokine analysis study.

Number of Animals
Day 3 Day 5
PCB doses (μg/g) No Exercise Exercise No Exercise Exercise
0 6 6 6 6
100 6 6 6 6
500 6 6 6 6
1000 6 6 6 6
Total 24 24 24 24

Tissue extraction procedure

The wound and the surrounding tissue from animals that were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by decapitation with a guillotine at Day 3 and Day 5 after wound creation were harvested using a 6 mm punch biopsy instrument (Robbins Instruments, Chatham, NJ). Previous study has measured cytokine levels in wound tissue at 3 and 5 days after wound creation [19]. The tissue was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored in -80°C freezer. This tissue was homogenized using a protocol developed by Frank and Kampfer [31]. The wound tissue was homogenized in an extraction solution containing sterile 1X PBS and an antiprotease buffer, cOmplete, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). One tablet of cOmplete was added to 50 ml of 1X PBS to prepare the extraction solution. A single wound tissue sample was added to 1 ml of the extraction solution and homogenized using a PowerGen Generator (PowerGen 125, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) and a saw tooth blades (7X95mm). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant thus obtained was aspirated into 3 ml syringes (BD Biosciences, Mexico) and passed through a 1.2 μm Sartorius Minisart Syringe filter (Supelco, Bellfonte, PA). The filtrate (approx. 600 μl) was aliquoted into tubes and stored at -80°C. A 15 μl aliquot was used for protein assay.

Protein assays

Protein concentrations of tissue extracts were determined by using Bio-Rad Protein Assay–Dye Reagent Concentrate, following the protocol of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA. Protein assays were done in order to express cytokine concentrations in the samples per milligram of protein. Stock protein standard solution of 1mg/ml was prepared by using bovine albumin purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO dissolved in distilled water. Blank and serial dilutions of standard (1 mg/ml, 0.8 mg/ml, 0.6 mg/ml, 0.4 mg/ml and 0.2 mg/ml) were used to generate the standard curve. The 15 μl aliquot of tissue extract was diluted in 30 μl distilled water (total volume 45 μl) and 10 μl of this dilution was used to load a single well of a Costar 96 well plate. All protein assays were done in triplicate. The dye reagent concentrate was diluted 1:4 with distilled water and 200 μl of this diluted dye was added to each of the wells. The plates were incubated on a shaker for 10 min and then absorbance was measured at 595 nm on a Clariostar plate reader (BMG Labtech, GmbH, Ottenberg, Germany) and analyzed using Mars Data Analysis Software (Version 3.01R2, 2013 BMG Labtech). A standard curve was plotted and used for calculating protein concentrations of tissue extracts. The protein concentrations were expressed as mg/ml.

Cytokine analysis

A Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine 23-plex Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) was used for measuring cytokine content using a Bio-Plex 200 instrument (lab of Dr. Stanislaw Stepkowski, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH) and Bio-Plex Manager 6.1 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) was used for machine operation and data collection. A Bio-Plex handheld magnetic washer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) was used for all washing steps. The protocol accompanying the kit was followed. The following cytokines were measured: Eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ: Interleukins (IL’s); IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12(p40), IL-12(p70), IL-13, IL-17A, KC (keratinocyte), MCP-1/MCAF (monocyte chemotactic and activating factor), MIP-1α, MIP-1β (macrophage inflammatory protein), RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha).

Data analysis

Statistical analysis for all data was completed using SPSS software (IBM, 2015, version 23). For the wound size data, general linear model Repeated Measures ANOVA (along with post hoc tests, Bonferroni and Tukey) was performed for PCB, Exercise and Day. Wound size on Day 0 (day of wound creation) over all the groups was normalized to 1 and all the values for the folowing days were sizes compared to Day 0. Error bars are +/- 1 standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance was ascribed to p ≤ 0.05.

For the cytokine concentration data, general linear model Univariate ANOVA (along with post hoc tests, Bonferroni and Tukey) was performed for PCB, Exercise and Day. Based on the significance of these data, independent T-tests were run between groups within PCB, Exercise and Day. Error bars are +/- 1 standard error of the mean (SEM). Significance was ascribed to p ≤ 0.05. Note: Before data were selected for running the statistical analysis, in each of the groups the numbers above or below the mean +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) were omitted since there were a few outliers that were drastically skewing the group means.

Results

Wound healing: PCB and exercise effects

Day effects

Wounds showed signficant size reductions across days. There was a significant main effect of time (F(6) = 223, p<0.001). There were significant differences for the pairwise comparisons from Day 1 to Day 6 of the analysis (see Fig 1) with the wounds decreasing in size in all groups.

Fig 1. Comparison of the wound size in animals from day 0 (day of wound creation) to day 9 (n = 11–49).

Fig 1

Animals from all the treatment groups were combined and used to study the day effect. The data have been normalized with the initial wound size on the day of production (Day 0) being 1. As can be expected, the wound size decreased consistently over the period, reduced to less than 10% in 9 days. Wound size is significantly less on all the previous days except for the immediate day before. For example, wound size on Day 3 is significantly less than Day 0 and Day 1, but not Day 2. All the other days followed a similar pattern.

Exercise effects

Exercise had no signficant impact on wound healing in the control group (0 PCB). However, there was a general pattern in which wound sizes decreased at a greater rate in exercised mice administered no PCB (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Effect of exercise on wound size in mice administered varying doses of PCB (n = 4–10).

Fig 2

Animals that were admininstered PCB in varying doses did not show any significant differences or trends in wound size on different days after wound production, irrespective of whether they were exercised or not. However, observation of the graph shows that there seems to be a difference in the mean wound sizes Day 1 through Day 6 between the exercise and no exercise groups with all doses of PCB, except PCB 1000.

PCB effects

Animals that were not exercised did not experience any significant changes or trends in wound healing rates with varying PCB doses. There was a pattern where the rates of wound healing are greater in PCB 1000 administered animals as compared to PCB 0 (Fig 3C), PCB 100 (Fig 3E) and PCB 500 (Fig 3F). Comparison of the other PCB doses did not yield any obvious pattern (Fig 3A, 3B and 3D).

Fig 3. Comparison of wound sizes on different days in animals not exercised and administered varying doses of PCB (n = 4–10).

Fig 3

C, E and F: The mean wound size is less on Day 2 through Day 6 in PCB 1000 treated animals as compared to PCB 0, PCB 100 and PCB 500 administered mice, though no significant differences or trends were observed. A, B, and D: No significant differences or trends and no difference in means were observed when the other doses of PCB were compared.

Exercise and PCB interactions

Exercise and PCB exposure appeared to interact in diverse ways. In the low dose group exposed to PCB 100 mice (Fig 2B) those not exercised healed at a greater rate than the exercised group. A nonsignificant pattern was revealed where wound sizes decrease at a greater rate in exercised mice administered PCB 500 (Fig 2C). Additionally wound healing rates appear very similar in exercised and not exercised mice administered PCB 1000 (Fig 2D).

No significant changes or trends in wound healing rates with varying PCB doses were observed in animals that were exercised. However, the figures reveal a pattern where the rates of wound healing are less in PCB 100 administered animals as compared to PCB 0 (Fig 4A), PCB 500 (Fig 4D) and PCB 1000 (Fig 4E). No particular pattern was observed with other PCB doses (Fig 4B, 4C and 4F).

Fig 4. Comparison of wound sizes on different days in exercised animals administered varying doses of PCB (n = 4–10).

Fig 4

A, D and E: The mean wound size is greater on Day 1 through Day 6 in PCB 100 treated animals as compared to PCB 0, PCB 500 and PCB 1000 administered mice, though no significant differences or trends were observed. B, C, and F: No significant differences or trends and no difference in means were observed when the other doses of PCB were compared.

Cytokine concentrations

The cytokine concentrations mentioned in the following sections are concentrations in the wound tissue and not circulating concentrations or whole animal concentrations.

Effect of exercise and PCB on IL-1β levels

IL-1β concentrations were determined at Day 3 and Day 5 post-wounding (Fig 5). Univariate ANOVA revealed following significant interactions: PCB X exercise (F3,51 = 3.956; p = 0.013), PCB X day (F3,51 = 3.707; p = 0.017) and exercise X day (F1,51 = 8.033; p = 0.007). Independent t-tests were performed to further explore the within group interactions.

Fig 5. Effect of exercise and PCB on levels of IL-1β in wound tissue at day 3 and day 5 post-wounding.

Fig 5

Comparison of IL-1β levels, 3 days post-wounding in animals not exercised reveals a pattern of reduced concentrations with different doses of PCB as compared to no PCB administration, with PCB 100 demonstrating the most reduction. Similar pattern is observed at Day 3 in exercised animals, but with no change in PCB 100 administration. However, on Day 5, IL-1β concentrations in not exercised animals reveals a pattern of dose dependent increase. In exercised animals, on Day 5, concentrations of IL-1β are higher in PCB 100 and 1000 doses, but remain the same with PCB 500 administration.

Exercise and day interactions

The effects of exercise depended on the day that levels of cytokines were analyzed. Concentrations of IL-1β on Day 5 in mice not administered PCB were significantly less in exercised as compared to not exercised mice (!:t5 = 4.561; p = 0.006). Exercised mice, not administered PCB, revealed significantly less IL-1β on Day 5 as compared to Day 3 (*:t6 = 3.932; p = 0.008) (Fig 5C and 5D).

PCB and day interactions

On Day 3 wound tissue from animals not exercised contained significantly less of IL-1β in mice given 100 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals receiving no PCB (&:t6 = 2.982; p = 0.025) (Fig 5A). In mice not exercised, administered 100 μg/g PCB, significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β were present post-wounding on Day 5 as compared to Day 3 (#:t6 = -2.640; p = 0.039) (Fig 5A and 5B). On post-wounding Day 5, not exercised mice revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β in animals administered 1000 μg/g PCB as compared to mice not administered PCB (@:t4 = -10.193; p = 0.001) (Fig 5B). Mice that were not exercised, on post-wounding Day 5 revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 100 μg/g PCB (¤:t5 = -2.898; p = 0.034) (Fig 5B). A between-group comparison showed that post-wounding Day 5 mice that were not exercised revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β in 1000 μg/g PCB treated animals as compared to animals administered 500 μg/g PCB (§:t5 = -2.670; p = 0.044) (Fig 5B). Between group comparison revealed that mice that were not exercised and administered 1000 μg/g PCB, exhibited significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β on post-wounding Day 5 as compared to Day 3 ($:t6 = -3.771; p = 0.009) (Fig 5A and 5B).

PCB and exercise interactions

Tissue from mice administered 100 μg/g PCB, contained significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β on Day 3 in exercised animals as compared to animals not exercised (£:t6 = -3.309; p = 0.016) (Fig 5A and 5C). Post-wounding Day 5 animals that were exercised demonstrated significantly lesser concentrations of IL-1β in 500 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 100 μg/g PCB (:t7 = 2.719; p = 0.030) (Fig 5D). On post-wounding Day 5, exercised animals, demonstrated significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β in mice administered 100 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals not administered PCB (:t6 = -3.678; p = 0.010) (Fig 5D). On Day 5, mice administered 500 μg/g PCB, displayed a trend towards less IL-1β in exercised as compared to not exercised animals (t7 = 2.173; p = 0.066) (Fig 5B and 5D). Concentrations of IL-1β on Day 5 in mice administered 1000 μg/g PCB were significantly less in exercised mice as compared to mice not exercised (¥:t5 = 6.722; p = 0.001) (Fig 5B and 5D). Mice that were exercised, on Day 5 post-wounding revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-1β in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones not administered PCB (Δ:t6 = -3.659; p = 0.011) (Fig 5D).

Effect of exercise and PCB on IL-6 levels

IL-6 levels were measured at Day 3 and Day 5 post-wounding (Fig 6). Univariate ANOVA revealed significant PCB effect (F3,56 = 3.008; p = 0.038). It also revealed significant interactions of the following: PCB X exercise (F3,56 = 3.113; p = 0.033), PCB X day (F3,56 = 3.103; p = 0.034) and exercise X day (F1,56 = 7.400; p = 0.009). There was a trend towards PCB X exercise X day interaction (F3,56 = 2.408; p = 0.077). Independent t-tests were performed to further explore the within group interactions.

Fig 6. Effect of exercise and PCB on levels of IL-6 in wound tissue at day 3 and day 5 post-wounding.

Fig 6

In not exercised animals, on Day 3, there appears to be no difference in the means of IL-6 concentrations across PCB doses. However, Day 3, exercised animals demonstrate a pattern of reduced IL-6 concentrations with PCB 500 and PCB 1000, but increased with PCB 100 administration as compared to PCB 0. On Day 5, in not exercised mice, IL-6 concentrations appear to be greater with all PCB doses when compared to PCB 0, with PCB 100 being the highest. Whereas, Day 5, exercised animals reveal pattern of slight decrease with all PCB doses as compared to no PCB administration.

Exercise and day interactions

There were no significant exercise and day interactions.

PCB and day interactions

On post-wounding Day 5, mice not exercised revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-6 in animals administered 500 μg/g PCB as compared to mice not administered PCB (¥:t7 = -4.922; p = 0.002) (Fig 6B). Post-wounding Day 5 animals that were not exercised revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-6 in 500 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 100 μg/g PCB (¶:t7 = -2.862; p = 0.024) (Fig 6B). Mice that were not exercised, on post-wounding Day 5 demonstrated lower concentrations of IL-6 in 1000 μG/G PCB administered animals as compared to 500 μg/g PCB administered mice (¤:t7 = 3.073; p = 0.018) (Fig 6B). In mice that were not exercised and administered 500 μg/g PCB, there were significantly greater concentrations of IL-6 on post-wounding Day 5 as compared to Day 3 (#:t6 = -5.447; p = 0.001) (Fig 6A and 6B).

PCB and exercise interactions

Exercised animals, on Day 3 post-wounding, revealed significantly greater concentrations of IL-6 in mice administered 100 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals not administered PCB (€:t7 = -2.737; p = 0.029) (Fig 6C). Mice that were exercised, on Day 3 post-wounding demonstrated significantly lesser concentrations of IL-6 in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones not administered PCB (&:t8 = 2.722; p = 0.026) (Fig 6C). Mice that were exercised, on Day 3 post-wounding revealed significantly lesser concentrations of IL-6 in 500 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to 100 μg/g PCB administered mice (Δ:t8 = 2.382; p = 0.044) (Fig 6C). Post-wounding Day 3 mice that were exercised revealed significantly lesser concentrations of IL-6 in 1000 μg/g PCB treated animals as compared to animals administered 100 μg/g PCB (∞:t9 = 6.883; p < 0.001) (Fig 6C). Concentrations of IL-6 on Day 3 post-wounding in mice administered 100 μg/g PCB were significantly greater in exercised mice as compared to mice not exercised ($:t8 = -2.564; p = 0.033) (Fig 6A and 6C). In mice that were exercised and administered 100 μg/g PCB, there were significantly lesser concentrations of IL-6 on Day 5 post-wounding as compared to Day 3 (*:t8 = 5.344; p = 0.001) (Fig 6C and 6D). In mice administered 500 μg/g PCB, on post-wounding Day 5 revealed significantly lower concentrations of IL-6 in exercised animals as compared to animals not exercised (!:t7 = 5.502; p = 0.001) (Fig 6B and 6D). On Day 3 post-wounding, mice administered 1000 μg/g PCB, revealed significantly lower concentrations of IL-6 in exercised animals as compared to animals not exercised (£:t8 = 2.458; p = 0.039) (Fig 6A and 6C).

Effect of exercise and PCB on KC levels

KC levels were measured at Day 3 and Day 5 post-wounding (Fig 7). Univariate ANOVA did not reveal any significant individual or group interactions. Independent t-tests were performed to explore any within group interactions.

Fig 7. Effect of exercise and PCB on levels of KC in wound tissue at day 3 and day 5 post-wounding.

Fig 7

KC concentrations on Day 3 in not exercised animals reveal pattern of reduction with increasing PCB doses, except PCB 1000 where there is an increase. Similar pattern of reduction in KC concentrations with increasing dose is seen on Day 3, exercised animals, except for PCB 100 which demonstrates an increase. On Day 5, in not exercised animals, there is a pattern of greater KC with all PCB does as compared to PCB 0, with PCB 500 revealing the highest concentrations. However, exercised animals on Day 5 demonstrate a pattern of dose dependent reduction in KC concentrations.

Exercise and day interactions

There were no significant exercise and day interactions.

PCB and day interactions

Animals not exercised, on Day 5 post-wounding, demonstrated significantly greater concentrations of KC in mice administered 500 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals not administered PCB ($:t5 = -2.585; p = 0.049) (Fig 7B). Post-wounding Day 3 animals that were not exercised revealed considerably lesser concentrations of KC in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 500 μg/g PCB (:t7 = -5.122; p = 0.001) (Fig 7A). In mice that were not exercised and administered 500 μg/g PCB, there were significantly greater concentrations of KC on Day 5 post-wounding as compared to Day 3 (*:t7 = -2.978; p = 0.021) (Fig 7A and 7B). On post-wounding Day 3, mice not exercised revealed significantly greater concentrations of KC in animals administered 1000 μg/g PCB as compared to mice administered 100 μg/g PCB (!:t6 = -3.014; p = 0.024) (Fig 7A).

PCB and exercise interactions

Mice that were exercised, on Day 3 post-wounding revealed considerably lesser concentrations of KC in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 100 μg/g PCB (£:t7 = 2.520; p = 0.040) (Fig 7C). On Day 3 post-wounding, mice administered 100 μg/g PCB, revealed trend towards more KC in exercised animals as compared to animals not exercised (t7 = -1.956; p = 0.091) (Fig 7A and 7C). In mice administered 500 μg/g PCB, on post-wounding Day 3 demonstrated trend towards more KC in exercised animals as compared to animals not exercised (t9 = -2.222; p = 0.053) (Fig 7A and 7C). Concentrations of KC on Day 3 post-wounding in mice administered 1000 μg/g PCB were considerably less in exercised mice as compared to mice not exercised (#:t6 = 5.011; p = 0.002) (Fig 7A and 7C).

Effect of exercise and PCB on MCP-1 levels

MCP-1 levels were measured at Day 3 and Day 5 post-wounding (Fig 8). Univariate ANOVA revealed significant day effect (F1,53 = 8.623; p = 0.005). It also revealed significant PCB X day interaction (F3,53 = 3.753; p = 0.016) and significant exercise X day interaction (F1,53 = 4.247; p = 0.044). Independent t-tests were performed to further explore the within group interactions.

Fig 8. Effect of exercise and PCB on levels of MCP-1 in wound tissue at day 3 and day 5 post-wounding.

Fig 8

On Day 3, not exercised animals demonstrate a pattern of increased MCP-1 concentrations with PCB administration as compared to no PCB administration, except PCB 500 which reveals a decrease. However, on Day 3, in exercised animals, a pattern of reduced MCP-1 concentrations with PCB administration is observed, except PCB 100 where it increases. Day 5, not exercised animals demonstrate a pattern of dose dependent increase in MCP-1 concentrations, except PCB 1000 which is similar to PCB 0. Similarly, exercised animals, on Day 5, have greater MCP-1 concentrations with PCB administration, except PCB 1000 which is lower.

Exercise and day interactions

There were no significant exercise and day interactions.

PCB and day interactions

Animals not exercised, on Day 5 post-wounding, revealed significantly greater concentrations of MCP-1 in mice administered 100 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals not administered PCB ($:t6 = -3.320; p = 0.016) (Fig 8B). On post-wounding Day 5, mice not exercised revealed trend towards more MCP-1 in animals administered 500 μg/g PCB as compared to mice not administered PCB (t7 = -2.279; p = 0.057) (Fig 8B). Mice not exercised, on Day 3 post-wounding demonstrated significantly greater concentrations of MCP-1 in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 500 μg/g PCB (!:t7 = -2.448; p = 0.044) (Fig 8A). In mice that were not exercised and administered 500 μg/g PCB, there was a trend towards more MCP-1 on Day 5 post-wounding as compared to Day 3 (t8 = -2.299; p = 0.051) (Fig 8A and 8B).

PCB and exercise interactions

Day 5 post-wounding animals that were exercised revealed trend towards less MCP-1 in 1000 μG/G PCB administered animals as compared to the ones administered 500 μg/g PCB (t5 = 2.532; p = 0.052) (Fig 8D). Concentrations of MCP-1 on post-wounding Day 3 in mice administered 500 μg/g PCB were significantly greater in exercised as compared to not exercised mice (#:t7 = -2.460; p = 0.043) (Fig 8A and 8C). In mice that were exercised and administered 1000 μg/g PCB, there were considerably lesser concentrations of MCP-1 on Day 5 post-wounding as compared to Day 3 (*:t8 = 3.088; p = 0.015) (Fig 8C and 8D).

Effect of exercise and PCB on TNF-α levels

TNF-α levels were measured at Day 3 and Day 5 post-wounding (Fig 9). Univariate ANOVA did not reveal any significant individual or group interaction effects. Independent t-tests were performed to further explore the within group interactions.

Fig 9. Effect of exercise and PCB on levels of TNF-α in wound tissue at day 3 and day 5 post-wounding.

Fig 9

On Day 3, not exercised animals demonstrate reduced TNF-α concentrations with varying doses of PCB administration as compared to no PCB. Similarly, reduced TNF-α concentrations were seen with PCB administration in exercised animals on Day 3. On Day 5, in not exercised animals, PCB 100 revealed a slight increase in TNF-α concentrations, whereas PCB 500 and PCB 1000 demonstrated little or no change when compared to no PCB. However, on Day 5, exercised mice, reveal little or no change with varying doses of PCB.

Exercise and day interactions

There were no significant exercise and day interactions.

PCB and day interactions

Not exercised animals, on post-wounding Day 3, demonstrated considerably lesser concentrations of TNF-α in mice administered 100 μg/g PCB as compared to the animals not administered PCB (*:t6 = 2.838; p = 0.030) (Fig 9A).

PCB and exercise interactions

On Day 3 post-wounding, exercised mice revealed trend towards less TNF-α in animals administered 100 μg/g PCB as compared to mice not administered PCB (t8 = 2.187; p = 0.060) (Fig 9C). Mice that were exercised, on Day 3 post-wounding revealed considerably lesser concentrations of TNF-α in 500 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones not administered PCB (#:t9 = 2.449; p = 0.037) (Fig 9C). Post-wounding Day 3 animals that were exercised revealed trend towards less TNF-α in 1000 μg/g PCB administered animals as compared to the ones not administered PCB (t9 = 2.169; p = 0.058) (Fig 9C).

Discussion

There are many factors that can influence wound healing and related immune responses. These include the diverse factors of 1) time period following injury, 2) age when injury occurred, 3) sex of the subject, 4) hormonal status (in the present work this could be shifted due to exposure of a known endocrine disruptor), and most importantly, 5) the intensity and duration of different components or stages of immunoregulation. The extent of research on these different influences is vast but much more work needs to be completed in order to understand how these factors interact with specific environmental experiences such as exposure to toxicants or exercise. Despite endocrine disruption being a pervasive experience with many diverse compounds in the environment [32] little is known about the relationship between wound healing and immune responses following exposure to these compounds. Similarly, exercise effects have been well documented yet interactions with exposure to endocrine disruption has been widely neglected. We will discuss each of these factors in turn as they interact with either exercise or exposure to PCB as well as discuss our findings for how exercise and PCB combine to alter wound healing and the immune reaction that follows.

There is an abundant amount of data showing that wound healing depends upon time-dependent expression of a variety of physiological signals and processes [33]. One of the complicating factors involved in studying diverse influences on healing is the different time scales that factors primarily operate. Exercise effects are time-dependent and can have several effects relatively rapidly, including an impact on immune function, during exercise and in the hours following [34]. Several of these effects are very short-lived and other effects that are more gradual in nature are longer lasting [35]. In comparison, exposure to endocrine disruptors such as PCBs lead to slower effects that can persist highly dependent upon the concentration of the toxin exposure [36,37]. Our doses were chosen based on this previous work showing that exposure to a similar concentration range of PCB alters hormone function and possibly could have an influence on immune responses. A major difference between the present work and the majority of the previous studies examining PCB effects was the age of the animal subject being studied.

Quite a bit is known about interactions between age and environmental factors of endocrine disruption per se [3840]. Many studies have found that earlier exposure in the perinatal period leads to the greatest alterations in behavior and physiology [41,42]. This early period is characterized with vulnerable physiological and anatomical development including brain regions involved in cognition, emotion and motivation. Exercise effects have also been shown to be age-dependent [43,44]. Several of the effects are more pronounced in the aged animal compared to the young, supporting the idea that exercise benefits include slowing of certain aging processes. Immune function seems to also fit into this realm. Wound healing rates have been shown to be faster in aged mice that were exercised as compared to sedentary mice [19]. As observed in this previous study, wound healing data from the present study, which also used young adult animals, revealed a pattern of faster wound healing in exercised animals as compared to the mice not exercised. This pattern was observed in mice either dosed with no PCB and PCB at 500 μg/g. PCB administered at 100 μg/g resulted in a reversed pattern of slower wound healing in exercised mice. The effects may have been even more significant if exercise was completed at an older age. Combining these two factors of PCB and exercise was especially diffcult because of the need to study the younger animal subjects in order to see the most potent PCB-induced effects. Future work could explore earlier toxin exposure with a testing regimen that is expanded across the lifespan of the subject.

Sexual dimorphism of toxic effects of certain endocrine disruptors remains an important question and topic of study [45]. There is evidence that shows male subjects are more vulnerable and show significant changes in reproductive function and behavior [45,46]. When the animals were exposed to PCB in early development (e.g. neonatal nursing period) sex differences are clearly obtained that include sex-specific upregulation of several inflammatory signaling compounds [47]. Females exposure to PCB had significantly higher signaling molecules such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22 and increased gene expression from hypothalamic tissue. Males also had increases in certain components of the immune response making the two profiles similar but distinct. Our study focuses on females and this previous work shows that these animals do show altered immune responses that could impact wound healing and other immune reactions.

Sex differences have also been found in work examining exercise effects [48]. Females have been shown to benefit more from exercise experiences compared to males [49]. These previous studies used different methods and examined different age periods compared to the present work yet support the use of females due to the significant alterations found in these animals that point to harmful effects of toxin exposure and the possible benefits of exercise [50].

PCBs are potent endocrine disruptor compounds (EDCs). Recently key characteristics of EDCs have been determined focusing on mechanisms of EDCs that alter hormone synthesis, transport, receptor signaling and endocrine related epigenetic modifications [51]. Our previous work has focused on PCBs alteration of thyroid function [36,37,52]. There is support for PCB exposure leading to a hypothyroid state, one during development that can lead to impairment of organ function [53]. PCBs have also been shown to alter other hormones including corticosterone and testosterone function [5,54]. Exercise, on the other hand, has been shown to boost or enhance the functioning of these same endocrine functions [55]. In particular, exercise can boost thyroid function and act to ameliorate thyroid deficits including hypothyroid states [56,57]. This present study provides a foundation for future work to examine these types of relationships.

Our findings focused on wound healing and immune function as endpoints to measure PCB and exercise, but other endpoints such as hormone status could be examined in order to reveal possible benefits of exercise outside of immune responses. Relevant to the present results, thyroid status does have an impact on wound healing and related immune responses [56]. Based on this, PCB as a hypothyroid EDC should have led to a significant change in healing. The other factors including the age and sex of the animals reduced the impact of the PCB and lead a set of diverse interactions between PCB, exercise and the immune response.

Macrophages are critical to many processes, including wound healing. An inflammatory state can increase numbers of macrophages and alter their function. In some populations, moderate-intensity exercise reduced levels of MCP-1 in the wound, which may have led to decreased number of macrophages in the wound [19]. Additionally, PCBs have been demonstrated to impair the survival and function of macrophages [26]. There is research evidence that absence or reduced concentration of macrophages increases rate of wound healing [23]. It is possible that this effect on macrophages is only seen at greater doses of PCBs, such as 1000 μg/g in the present study. A macrophage-mediated effect could also bring about the result in the present study that PCB 1000 μg/g caused a pattern of most rapid wound healing in animals not exercised as compared to all other PCB doses. In the exercised animals, wound healing occurred less rapidly in the animals given PCB at 100 μg/g as compared to the animals administered other PCB doses.

Cytokines play an important role in the inflammatory phase of wound healing [58,59]. It has been previously demonstrated that decreases in pro-inflammatory cytokines in the wound tissue can accelerate wound healing [19,60]. In this study, increased inflammatory cytokines on Day 3 in exercised mice administered 100 μg/g PCB, may be the reason for depressed wound healing rates observed initially as compared to the mice that were not exercised (Fig 2B). Also, it may be that the decrease seen in inflammatory cytokines on Day 5 in PCB administered animals that were not exercised is the reason that wounds healed more rapidly in animals administered 1000 μg/g PCB as compared to the other PCB doses (Fig 3C, 3E and 3F). Day 5 post-wounding in mice not exercised and Day 3 post-wounding in exercised mice demonstrated a similar pattern of IL-6, KC and MCP-1 cytokine content, which could be the result of the inflammation phase occurring at an earlier stage in exercised mice, contributing to the pattern of more rapid wound healing observed in exercised animals administered 0 μg/g PCB, 500 μg/g PCB and 1000 μg/g PCB (Fig 2A, 2C and 2D).

Previous studies have also suggested that reducing the strength of response and length of the inflammatory phase or hastening the resolution phase of wound healing could lead to more rapid wound healing [23,61]. In this study, exercise had diverse effects on cytokine levels, but increased cytokine levels in the two greater doses. Explanations for these diverse effects include the use of young animals with more rapid wound healing rates less affected by toxin exposure, as well as PCB-mediated compensatory effects at specific doses which could actually enhance immune function.

The findings demonstrate the complex nature of interactions that can occur following PCB exposure. The effects of PCB can vary depending upon the dose and duration of exposure. Many of the effects of PCBs and other EDCs are non-monotonic and our study supports this dose-response relationship. The rationale for these nonlinear functions are diverse. One perspective, hormesis, emphasizes the role of compensatory mechanisms occurring at different doses and not others [62]. The ideas of hormesis in toxicology emphasize that exposure to low doses of toxicants leads to an adaptive response that protects or buffers exposures to higher doses [63,64]. The adaptive nature of this low dose is controversial but recent work has supported the idea of a hermetic zone for certain synthetic chemical toxicants [65]. The present findings only partially fit this idea of hormesis. Some aspects of the immune reaction were enhanced at lower doses while the same responses were unchanged or altered in the opposite direction at higher doses. These types of relationships are becoming more common in work on toxicology and endocrine disruption. The present study reveals possibilities for applying unique methods to reduce harmful effects of environmental toxins. There has been very little work on this idea yet a few studies have found exercise to positively influence exposure to environmental compounds [66,67]. Taking these novel approaches to tackle harmful effects of environmental toxins is required and the methods and findings will certainly be complex yet move the field forward to understanding how to implement new strategies most effectively.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dr. Pavel Anzenbacher Department of Chemistry and his student Elena for use of plate reader for protein assay; Dr. Stanislaw Stepkowski, Medical Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Toledo and his student Dulat for use of Bio-Plex; Vipaporn Phuntumart, Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University for use of lab space and resources; Dr. Gary Ross, Bio-Rad provided guidance to run cytokine assays.

Data Availability

The data is available on figshare, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12768332.

Funding Statement

Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Shields PG. 2006. Understanding population and individual risk assessment: the case of polychlorinated biphenyls. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5):830–839. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Segre M, Arena SM, Greeley EH, Melancon MJ, Graham DA, French JB Jr. Immunological and physiological effects of chronic exposure of Peromyscus leucopus to Aroclor 1254 at a concentration similar to that found at contaminated sites. Toxicology. 2002;174(3):163–72. 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00039-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hopf NB, Ruder AM, Succop P. Background levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in the U.S. population. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407(24):6109–6119. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Safe S. 2004. Endocrine disruptors and human health: is there a problem. Toxicology. 2004;205(1–2):3–10. 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meserve LA, Murray BA, Landis JA. 1992. Influence of maternal ingestion of Aroclor 1254 (PCB) or FireMaster BP-6 (PBB) on unstimulated and stimulated corticosterone levels in young rats. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992;48(5):715–720. 10.1007/BF00195992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pruitt DL, Meserve LA, Bingman VP. Reduced growth of intra- and infra-pyramidal mossy fibers is produced by continuous exposure to polychlorinated biphenyl. Toxicology. 1999;138(1):11–17. 10.1016/s0300-483x(99)00073-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heilmann C, Grandjean P, Weihe P, Nielsen F, and Budtz-Jørgensen E. Reduced antibody responses to vaccinations in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls. PLoS. Med. 2006;3(8):e311 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schell LM, Gallo MV, Ravenscroft J, DeCaprio AP. Persistent organic pollutants and anti-thyroid peroxidase levels in Akwesasne Mohawk young adults. Environ Res. 2009;109(1):86–92. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harper N, Connor K, Steinberg M, and Safe S. Immunosuppressive activity of polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures and congeners: nonadditive (antagonistic) interactions. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1995;27(1):131–139. 10.1006/faat.1995.1116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loose LD, Silkworth JB, Charbonneau T, Blumenstock F. Environmental chemical-induced macrophage dysfunction. Environ Health Perspect. 1981;June;39:79–92. 10.1289/ehp.813979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tryphonas H, Luster MI, Schiffman G, Dawson LL, Hodgen M, Germolec D, et al. Effect of chronic exposure of PCB (Aroclor 1254) on specific and nonspecific immune parameters in the rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkey. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1991;May;16(4):773–86. 10.1016/0272-0590(91)90163-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roch P and Cooper EL. Cellular but not humoral antibacterial activity of earthworms is inhibited by Aroclor 1254. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1991;Dec;22(3):283–90. 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90079-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ville P, Roch P, Cooper EL, Masson P, Narbonne JF. PCBs increase molecular-related activities (lysozyme, antibacterial, hemolysis, proteases) but inhibit macrophage-related functions (phagocytosis, wound healing) in earthworms. J Invertebr Pathol. 1995;May;65(3):217–24. 10.1006/jipa.1995.1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Merghani A, Malhotra A, Sharma S. The U-shaped relationship between exercise and cardiac morbidity. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016;April;26(3):232–40. 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mathur N and Pedersen BK. Exercise as a mean to control low-grade systemic inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2008:109502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goh J and Ladiges WC. Exercise enhances wound healing and prevents cancer progression during aging by targeting macrophage polarity. Mech Ageing Dev. 2014;July;139:41–8. 10.1016/j.mad.2014.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;August 5;11(9):607–15. 10.1038/nri3041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang J, Ting Yuan T, and Wang J. Moderate treadmill running exercise prior to tendon injury enhances wound healing in aging rats Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):8498–8512. 10.18632/oncotarget.7381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Keylock KT, Vieira VJ, Wallig MA, DiPietro LA, Schrementi M, Woods JA. Exercise accelerates cutaneous wound healing and decreases wound inflammation in aged mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;January;294(1):R179–84. 10.1152/ajpregu.00177.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;. Sep-Oct;16(5):585–601. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Swift ME, Burns AL, Gray KL, DiPietro LA. Age-related alterations in the inflammatory response to dermal injury. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;November;117(5):1027–35. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01539.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ashcroft GS, Mills SJ, Ashworth JJ. Ageing and wound healing. Biogerontology. 2002;3(6):337–45. 10.1023/a:1021399228395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin P and Leibovich SJ. Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;November;15(11):599–607. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pence BD and Woods JA. Exercise, obesity, and cutaneous wound healing: Evidence from rodent and human studies. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014;January 1;3(1):71–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ganey PE, Sirois JE, Denison M, Robinson JP, Roth RA. Neutrophil function after exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in vitro. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;October;101(5):430–4. 10.1289/ehp.93101430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ferrante MC, Raso GM, Esposito E, Bianco G, Iacono A, Clausi MT, et al. Effects of non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl congeners (PCB 101, PCB 153 and PCB 180) alone or mixed on J774A.1 macrophage cell line: modification of apoptotic pathway. Toxicol Lett. Apr 2011; April 10;202(1):61–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shin KJ, Bae SS, Hwang YA, Seo JK, Ryu SH, Suh PG. 2,2',4,6,6'-pentachlorobiphenyl induces apoptosis in human monocytic cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000;November 15;169(1):1–7. 10.1006/taap.2000.9034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yoo BS, Jung KH, Hana SB, Kim HM. Apoptosis-mediated immunotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in murine splenocytes. Toxicol Lett. 1997;April 28;91(2):83–9. 10.1016/s0378-4274(96)03861-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nishida N, Farmer JD, Kodavanti PRS, Tilson HA, MacPhail RC. Effects of Acute and Repeated Exposures to Aroclor 1254 in Adult Rats: Motor Activity and Flavor Aversion Conditioning. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 1997;40:68–74. 10.1006/faat.1997.2352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao F, Mayura K, Harper N, Safe SH, Phillips TD. Inhibition of 3,3',4,4',5- pentachlorobiphenyl-induced fetal cleft palate and immunotoxicity in C57BL/6 mice by 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl. Chemosphere. 1997;Mar-Apr;34(5–7):1605–13. 10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00456-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Frank S, Kampfer H. 2003. Excisional wound healing In: Wound Healing: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine, edited by DiPietro LA and Burns AL. Totowa, NJ: Humana, 2003;78:3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Andersson N, Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Grignard E, Kienzler A, et al. Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Journal. 2018;16(6), e05311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steed DL. Wound-healing trajectories. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(3):547–vii. 10.1016/S0039-6109(02)00208-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Campbell JP, Turner JE. Debunking the Myth of Exercise-Induced Immune Suppression: Redefining the Impact of Exercise on Immunological Health Across the Lifespan. Front Immunol. 2018;9:648 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao JX, Jin X, Huang JJ, Yao Y, Yu LS, Fan YY. Time-dependent Expression and Distribution of AChE during the Skin Incised Wound Healing in Mice. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;35(2):143–148. 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Provost TL, Juárez de Ku LM, Zender C, Meserve LA. Dose- and age-dependent alterations in choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity, learning and memory, and thyroid hormones in 15- and 30-day old rats exposed to 1.25 or 12.5 PPM polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) beginning at conception. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1999;23(5):915–928. 10.1016/s0278-5846(99)00035-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toth CL, Mankin DE, Hiler KA, Baldwin AF, Meserve LA, Cromwell HC. Influence of Perinatal Polychlorinated Biphenyl or Thiouracil on Dopamine Function. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2019;11, 283–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Curtis SW, Terrell ML, Jacobson MH, Cobb DO, Jiang VS, Neblett MF, et al. Thyroid hormone levels associate with exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated biphenyls in adults exposed as children. Environ Health. 2019;18(1):75 10.1186/s12940-019-0509-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bell MR, Thompson LM, Rodriguez K, Gore AC. Two-hit exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls at gestational and juvenile life stages: 1. Sexually dimorphic effects on social and anxiety-like behaviors. Horm Behav. 2016;78:168–177. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sharma R, Derr-Yellin EC, House DE, Kodavanti PR. Age-dependent effects of Aroclor 1254R on calcium uptake by subcellular organelles in selected brain regions of rats. Toxicology. 2000;156(1):13–25. 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00328-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jolous-Jamshidi B, Cromwell HC, McFarland AM, Meserve LA. Perinatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls alters social behaviors in rats. Toxicol Lett. 2010;199(2):136–143. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Berghuis SA, Roze E. Prenatal exposure to PCBs and neurological and sexual/pubertal development from birth to adolescence. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2019;49(6):133–159. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2019.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Siette J, Westbrook RF, Cotman C, Sidhu K, Zhu W, Sachdev P, et al. Age-specific effects of voluntary exercise on memory and the older brain. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(5):435–442. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jin JJ, Ko IG, Kim SE, Hwang L, Lee MG, Kim DY, et al. Age-dependent differences of treadmill exercise on spatial learning ability between young- and adult-age rats. Journal of exercise rehabilitation. 2017;13(4), 381–386. 10.12965/jer.1735070.535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kern JK, Geier DA, Homme KG, King PG, Bjørklund G, Chirumbolo S, et al. Developmental neurotoxicants and the vulnerable male brain: a systematic review of suspected neurotoxicants that disproportionally affect males. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2017;77(4):269–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Krishnan K, Mittal N, Thompson LM, Rodriguez-Santiago M, Duvauchelle CL, Crews D, et al. Effects of the Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals, Vinclozolin and Polychlorinated Biphenyls, on Physiological and Sociosexual Phenotypes in F2 Generation Sprague-Dawley Rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(9):97005 10.1289/EHP3550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bell MR, Dryden A, Will R, Gore AC. Sex differences in effects of gestational polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on hypothalamic neuroimmune and neuromodulator systems in neonatal rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018;353:55–66. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cohan CH, Youbi M, Saul I, Ruiz AA, Furones CC, Patel P, et al. Sex-Dependent Differences in Physical Exercise-Mediated Cognitive Recovery Following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:261 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tanner MK, Fallon IP, Baratta MV, Greenwood BN. Voluntary exercise enables stress resistance in females. Behav Brain Res. 2019;369:111923 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Baldwin DR, Wilcox ZC, Zheng G. The effects of voluntary exercise and immobilization on humoral immunity and endocrine responses in rats. Physiol Behav. 1997;61(3):447–453. 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00459-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.La Merrill MA, Vandenberg LN, Smith MT, Goodson W, Browne P, Patisaul HB, et al. Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:45–57. 10.1038/s41574-019-0273-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Donahue DA, Dougherty EJ, Meserve LA. Influence of a combination of two tetrachlorobiphenyl congeners (PCB 47; PCB 77) on thyroid status, choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity, and short- and long-term memory in 30-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicology. 2004;203(1–3):99–107. 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Giera S, Bansal R, Ortiz-Toro TM, Taub DG, Zoeller RT. Individual Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Congeners Produce Tissue- and Gene-Specific Effects on Thyroid Hormone Signaling during Development. Endocrinology. 2011;July 1;152(7): 2909–2919. 10.1210/en.2010-1490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hany J, Lilienthal H, Sarasin A, Roth-Härer A, Fastabend A, Dunemann L, et al. Developmental exposure of rats to a reconstituted PCB mixture or aroclor 1254: effects on organ weights, aromatase activity, sex hormone levels, and sweet preference behavior. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999;158(3):231–243. 10.1006/taap.1999.8710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hackney AC, Lane AR. Exercise and the Regulation of Endocrine Hormones. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;135:293–311. 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fortunato RS, Ignácio DL, Padron AS, Peçanha R, Marassi MP, Rosenthal D, et al. The effect of acute exercise session on thyroid hormone economy in rats. J Endocrinol. 2008;198(2):347–353. 10.1677/JOE-08-0174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Uribe RM, Jaimes-Hoy L, Ramírez-Martínez C, García-Vázquez A, Romero F, Cisneros M, et al. Voluntary exercise adapts the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis in male rats. Endocrinology. 2014;155(5):2020–2030. 10.1210/en.2013-1724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Menke NB, Ward KR, Witten TM, Bonchev DG, Diegelmann RF. 2007. Impaired wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;Jan-Feb;25(1):19–25. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Edwards R and Harding KG. Bacteria and wound healing. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;April;17(2):91–6. 10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Szpaderska AM, Zuckerman JD, DiPietro LA. Differential injury responses in oral mucosal and cutaneous wounds. J Dent Res. 2003;August;82(8):621–6. 10.1177/154405910308200810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Serhan CN, Brain SD, Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Haslett C, O’Neill LA, et al. Resolution of inflammation: state of the art, definitions and terms. FASEB J. 2007;February;21(2):325–32. 10.1096/fj.06-7227rev [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Calabrese EJ. Hormetic Mechanisms. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013;August;43(7):580–606. 10.3109/10408444.2013.808172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Calabrese EJ. Hormesis is central to toxicology, pharmacology and risk assessment. Human and Experimental Toxicology. 2010;29(4):249–261. 10.1177/0960327109363973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zemva J, Fink CA, Fleming TH, Schmidt L, Loft A, Herzig S, et al. Hormesis enables cells to handle accumulating toxic metabolites during increased energy flux. Redox Biology. 2017;October;13:674–686. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim SA, Lee YM, Choi JY, Jacobs DR Jr, Lee DH. Evolutionarily adapted hormesis-inducing stressors can be a practical solution to mitigate harmful effects of chronic exposure to low dose chemical mixtures. Environ Pollut. 2018;233:725–734. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lombarte M, Fina BL, Lupo M, Buzalaf MA, Rigalli A. Physical exercise ameliorates the toxic effect of fluoride on the insulin-glucose system. J Endocrinol. 2013;218(1):99–103. 10.1530/JOE-13-0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mautz WJ, Kleinman MT, Phalen RF, Crocker TT. Effects of exercise exposure on toxic interactions between inhaled oxidant and aldehyde air pollutants. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1988;25(2):165–177. 10.1080/15287398809531198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Hans-Joachim Lehmler

7 May 2020

PONE-D-20-09774

Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pillai,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers felt that the presentation of the data is confusing, that the discussion presents mostly results, and that the conclusions are not immediately evident.  In particular, the description of non-significant outcomes could be omitted to make key results from the study more accessible to the readers. Overall, the manuscript needs to be revised to present the results more cohesively. Such a revision will also avoid an overinterpretation of findings that are statistically significant but biologically not relevant. 

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 21 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hans-Joachim Lehmler, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1.    Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noted that one of your references did not auto populate and instead the manuscript contains the following  "Citation", please replace this with the appropriate reference during your next revision.

3. At this time, we request that you  please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the number of mice used in the study  

(2) Please include the secondary and confirmatory method of euthanasia, in addition to CO2 asphyxiation

(3) Please provide the dosage of isoflurane used to anaesthetise the mice during the wound creation experiment

(3) Please describe the post-operative care received by the animals in both the wound creation and exercise regimen experiments, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

Thank you for your attention to these requests.

4.  Please note that PLOS does not permit references to “data not shown.” Authors should provide the relevant data within the manuscript, the Supporting Information files, or in a public repository. If the data are not a core part of the research study being presented, we ask that authors remove any references to these data.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Pillai et al, examines the effects of PCB exposure on wound healing and if exercise could alter the rate of would healing following PCB exposure. Although potentially interesting, the manuscript is written and data are presented in a confused way and the conclusion are not evidenced.

As it is, the manuscript is just a list of experiments without any link among them. And considering the lack of significant changes in wound healing rates in the presence of PCB exposure and fluctuations in the statistically significant differences in inflammatory markers at random time points, I am afraid there is not even a strong correlation of the outcomes and markers that have been measured. What we see here could just be the noise in the data (upregulation of certain markers that may not even related to minor would healing changes between the groups)

The authors should rewrite the manuscript following a more logic way for planned experiments. The authors should definitively rewrite the Discussion part that, as it is, this section reads more like results with little discussion. The authors should clearly state which is the main finding of the study and discuss it according to the literature.

Reviewer #2: Review of manuscript entitled “Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function”, submitted for publication in Plos One.

The manuscript examines how PCB exposure at different doses (0, 100, 500, 1000 ppm i.p.) altered wound healing in exercised versus non-exercised subgroups of mice and investigates associated immune response modulation. Effect on wound size and alteration in key cytokines levels are measured following exposure of young female mice to exercise for two weeks followed by single dose PCB exposure. This study found that neither exercise nor PCB exposure significantly affect wound healing rate. Some significant alteration in cytokines are observed. The aim of the study was to study the mitigating effect of exercise against PCB effects on wound healing. Exercise had some varied effect on cytokines levels. I will suggest further consideration before manuscript is accepted.

1) The author should justify their choice of PCB doses.

2) The authors should reduce text and further deemphasize discussion of no statistically significant data. Also, some speculative language should be omitted (line 266-267).

3) Line 495-496 and elsewhere. it should be made clear that data are not statistically significant before discussing pattern in data.

4) I suggest data be presented as mean ± SD to better understand the said patterns in data.

5) It is not clear why cytokine levels are compared at days 3 and 5? It will be interesting to see a discussion on how cytokine changes found fit into the wound healing stages in mice.

6) It will be interesting to consider exploring sex differences in this study.

7) Explain significance symbols and related group comparison below each graph.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 24;15(8):e0237705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237705.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Jun 2020

Response to reviewers has been attached as a separate file as well. Following is the same information from that response.

Hans-Joachim Lehmler, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lehmler

We set out to examine diverse factors of exercise, exposure to endocrine disruptors and immune responses to unravel possible crucial interactions. As with most of the work on endocrine disruptors as environmental toxins, the results express not a simple but more of a complex, intricate relation among variables, thereby opening up unique research possibilities and merging distinct fields to advance understanding. We sincerely thank you and the reviewers for the thoughtful comments and the opportunity to resubmit this experimental work, entitled “Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function” to the journal, PLOS ONE.

We have responded to your and reviewers comments inline (italicized, line numbers provided are based on the track changes version of the manuscript) below. This includes a substantial revision of the results and discussion sections. We have altered the presentation of the data emphasizing the significant results and producing a cohesive, ordered manner of presentation of the findings. The discussion provides an overview of related work, interprets the relevant data and does not overextend any one particular idea. A strength of the experiment and its findings includes the combination of different features involved and how the study deals with the interactions among these different factors. The reviewers mentioned other important factors not directly examined, and we now deliberate on these factors as they relate to the present work and portent future studies better designed to investigate novel ways to reduce the harmful impact of environmental toxin exposure.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments.

Best Wishes,

Dr. Mahesh Pillai

-------------------------------------------------

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We have reviewed and met these requirements. The following sections were included in the initial submission, but since it was not found in the style template it was deleted.

FUNDING: Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors have no competing interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data will be made available upon acceptance of the manuscript and that the repository information will be given upon submission of the manuscript.

2. We noted that one of your references did not auto populate and instead the manuscript contains the following "Citation", please replace this with the appropriate reference during your next revision.

Citation added in line 66

Please note: line numbers provided are based on the track changes version of the manuscript

3. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the number of mice used in the study

Table 1 (page 8) and Table 2 (page 9) show the detailed distribution of mice used in this study. 48 mice were used for the wound healing part and 96 mice were used for the cytokine analysis part of this study.

(2) Please include the secondary and confirmatory method of euthanasia, in addition to CO2 asphyxiation

Post CO2 asphyxiation, mice were decapitated with a guillotine (updated in line 162, 211, 226)

(3) Please provide the dosage of isoflurane used to anaesthetise the mice during the wound creation experiment

2% (updated in line 191)

(3) Please describe the post-operative care received by the animals in both the wound creation and exercise regimen experiments, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

After PCB exposure, exercise regimen and wound generation, the animals were frequently monitored for evidence of distress (poor grooming, frantic appearance, poor coat condition, aversion to handling and wound infection). No signs of distress were observed in animals in this study. (updated in line 160)

4. Please note that PLOS does not permit references to “data not shown.” Authors should provide the relevant data within the manuscript, the Supporting Information files, or in a public repository. If the data are not a core part of the research study being presented, we ask that authors remove any references to these data.

That reference has been removed from line 213

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

We have identified a repository for the data and will provide information about it as soon as the manuscript is accepted.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

The data and the discussion have been significantly reworked on as per the reviewer’s suggestions.

Please note: line numbers provided are based on the track changes version of the manuscript

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

The data and the discussion have been significantly reworked on as per the reviewer’s suggestions.

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Pillai et al, examines the effects of PCB exposure on wound healing and if exercise could alter the rate of would healing following PCB exposure. Although potentially interesting, the manuscript is written and data are presented in a confused way and the conclusion are not evidenced.

As it is, the manuscript is just a list of experiments without any link among them. And considering the lack of significant changes in wound healing rates in the presence of PCB exposure and fluctuations in the statistically significant differences in inflammatory markers at random time points, I am afraid there is not even a strong correlation of the outcomes and markers that have been measured. What we see here could just be the noise in the data (upregulation of certain markers that may not even related to minor would healing changes between the groups)

The authors should rewrite the manuscript following a more logic way for planned experiments. The authors should definitively rewrite the Discussion part that, as it is, this section reads more like results with little discussion. The authors should clearly state which is the main finding of the study and discuss it according to the literature.

The data and the discussion have been significantly reworked on as per the reviewer’s suggestions. The results have been re-arranged so that it provides better understanding of specific interactions: Exercise and Day, PCB and Day, PCB and Exercise. Effects of PCB have been ordered from 0 to 100 to 500 to 1000 in each section to improve readability. The discussion provides more details and comparisons to previous studies.

Reviewer #2: Review of manuscript entitled “Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function”, submitted for publication in Plos One.

The manuscript examines how PCB exposure at different doses (0, 100, 500, 1000 ppm i.p.) altered wound healing in exercised versus non-exercised subgroups of mice and investigates associated immune response modulation. Effect on wound size and alteration in key cytokines levels are measured following exposure of young female mice to exercise for two weeks followed by single dose PCB exposure. This study found that neither exercise nor PCB exposure significantly affect wound healing rate. Some significant alteration in cytokines are observed. The aim of the study was to study the mitigating effect of exercise against PCB effects on wound healing. Exercise had some varied effect on cytokines levels. I will suggest further consideration before manuscript is accepted.

1) The author should justify their choice of PCB doses.

Explained in line 168. “Previous studies have used similar PCB dosage (Nishida et al., 1997) and intraperitoneal injections (Zhao et al., 1997).”

Please note: line numbers provided are based on the track changes version of the manuscript

2) The authors should reduce text and further deemphasize discussion of no statistically significant data. Also, some speculative language should be omitted (line 266-267).

This sentence has been reworded.

3) Line 495-496 and elsewhere. it should be made clear that data are not statistically significant before discussing pattern in data.

The data has been rearranged to look more cohesive and clear. This has been done by focusing on individual interactions between PCB, Day and exercise; and emphasizing significant data.

4) I suggest data be presented as mean ± SD to better understand the said patterns in data.

In the manuscript (Average ± SEM) is used and this is standard for other work.

5) It is not clear why cytokine levels are compared at days 3 and 5? It will be interesting to see a discussion on how cytokine changes found fit into the wound healing stages in mice.

Line 228 has explanation on why day 3 and 5 were used. “Previous study has measured cytokine levels in wound tissue at 3 and 5 days after wound creation (Keylock et al., 2008).” 2 paragraphs starting on line 1011 in discussion talk about cytokine changes in wound healing. We have discussed the role of cytokines in the inflammatory process and how the results from this study compare to previous studies.

6) It will be interesting to consider exploring sex differences in this study.

2 paragraphs starting on line 965 in discussion talk about sex differences in this study and previous studies. We have discussed different effects of PCB exposure and exercise in relationship to sexual differences.

7) Explain significance symbols and related group comparison below each graph.

The authors have detailed the significance of symbols and related group comparisons in the results section and believe that it will be redundant to include this information below each group. The information is present is sections describing results from each figure.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Hans-Joachim Lehmler

3 Aug 2020

Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function

PONE-D-20-09774R1

Dear Dr. Meserve,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Hans-Joachim Lehmler, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The decision to accept this manuscript is based on the feedback by Reviewer #1 and my own evaluation of the manuscript. 

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The data presented are not strong enough to support the conclusion. The significant effects observed in inflammatory response appears random. The association between wound healing and measured cytokines relied at based on trends in data with great variations in data points.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Hans-Joachim Lehmler

12 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-09774R1

Exercise influences the impact of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure on immune function

Dear Dr. Meserve:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Hans-Joachim Lehmler

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data is available on figshare, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12768332.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES