Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Aug 24;10:14102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70805-5

Extrapyramidal plasticity predicts recovery after spinal cord injury

E Huber 1, R Patel 2,3, M Hupp 1, N Weiskopf 7,8, M M Chakravarty 2,3,4, P Freund 1,5,6,7,
PMCID: PMC7445170  PMID: 32839540

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to wide-spread neurodegeneration across the neuroaxis. We explored trajectories of surface morphology, demyelination and iron concentration within the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit over 2 years post-SCI. This allowed us to explore the predictive value of neuroimaging biomarkers and determine their suitability as surrogate markers for interventional trials. Changes in markers of surface morphology, myelin and iron concentration of the basal ganglia and thalamus were estimated from 182 MRI datasets acquired in 17 SCI patients and 21 healthy controls at baseline (1-month post injury for patients), after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Using regression models, we investigated group difference in linear and non-linear trajectories of these markers. Baseline quantitative MRI parameters were used to predict 24-month clinical outcome. Surface area contracted in the motor (i.e. lower extremity) and pulvinar thalamus, and striatum; and expanded in the motor thalamus and striatum in patients compared to controls over 2-years. In parallel, myelin-sensitive markers decreased in the thalamus, striatum, and globus pallidus, while iron-sensitive markers decreased within the left caudate. Baseline surface area expansions within the striatum (i.e. motor caudate) predicted better lower extremity motor score at 2-years. Extensive extrapyramidal neurodegenerative and reorganizational changes across the basal ganglia-thalamic circuitry occur early after SCI and progress over time; their magnitude being predictive of functional recovery. These results demonstrate a potential role of extrapyramidal plasticity during functional recovery after SCI.

Subject terms: Biophysical models, Spinal cord diseases

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to permanent functional deficits below the level of injury. Neurorehabilitation can foster sensorimotor recovery, but often only partial improvements can be achieved. Recovery is paralleled by a cascade of progressive neurodegenerative changes affecting the pyramidal, sensory and limbic system1,2; its magnitude predicting functional recovery1,2. In addition, compensatory changes within the extrapyramidal system might contribute to recovery as shown in the non-human primate model of SCI3,4. For example, impaired information flow within the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit5 and the motor cortex6 was associated with abnormal activation patterns and increased functional connectivity in pallido-thalamocortical loops6. However, in SCI patients, the role of the extrapyramidal system in sensorimotor recovery is understudied7.

To characterize structural trajectories of surface area and microstructural parameters, we modelled the MRI measures in terms of linear rate of change (reflecting degeneration/plasticity) and non-linear rate of change (reflecting acceleration/deceleration). In particularly, T1-weighted volumes were used to track trajectories of vertex-wise surface area contractions and expansions of the basal ganglia and thalamic subnuclei over 2-years. Myelin-sensitive magnetization transfer saturation (MT) and longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), a well as iron-sensitive effective transverse relaxation rate (R2*)8,9 were used to characterize associated microstructural changes within the same regions. Finally, early MRI markers of basal ganglia and thalamic subnuclei changes at 1-month post-SCI were used to predict recovery at 2-years.

Methods

Subjects

17 SCI patients were recruited at the Balgrist University Hospital and 21 healthy controls from the local neighborhood between July 2010 and July 2016. All patients had a subacute SCI (< 3 months) without brain injury, and all participants had no pre-existing neurological, mental or medical disorders affecting functional outcome. A subset of this cohort was reported previously1013.

All participants underwent a comprehensive MRI protocol. In total, 182 appointments were attended by 38 participants (17 SCI patients, 21 healthy controls), at baseline (1-month post-SCI) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-SCI. Follow-ups were performed successfully in 82.4%, 100%, 100% and 76.5% of the patients, respectively in 100%, 100%, 95.2% and 100% of the controls. At the same time points, patients were also clinically assessed including 1) the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) protocol for motor, light-touch and pin-prick score, and 2) the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) to measure daily life independence. The mean age between patients (mean age 43.8 years) and controls (mean age 35.7) did not differ (Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.12).

The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee of Zurich “Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich, KEK” (EK-2010–0,271). All participants provided written informed consent before participation.

Image acquisition

Participants were scanned with a 3 T Magnetom Verio or the upgraded Skyra Fit MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) operated with a 16-channel radiofrequency receive head and neck coil and radiofrequency body transmit coil.

At each time point, the MRI measurement consisted of two protocols: (1) an optimized 3 dimensional high-resolution T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) sequence14 was used to segment the basal ganglia structures, and (2) a multi-parametric mapping protocol based on multi-echo 3D FLASH sequences15 was used to extract underlying microstructural parameters.

For the T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence, 176 sagittal partitions were acquired with a resolution of 1 mm isotropic within a nominal scan time of 9.04 min (field of view (FOV) = 224 × 256mm2, repetition time (TR) = 2420 ms, echo time (TE) = 4.18 ms, inversion time = 960 ms, flip angle (FA) = 9°, readout bandwidth = 150 Hz/pixel).

The MPM protocol consisted of 3 volumes including a T1-weighted image (TR = 25 ms, FA = 23°), a proton density (PD)-weighted image (TR = 25 ms, FA = 4°), and a magnetization transfer (MT)-weighted image (TR = 37 ms, FA = 9°) with 1 mm isotropic resolution. Total scan time was 23 min (FOV = 240 × 256mm2, readout bandwidth = 480 Hz/pixel) (for further details see1013).

Image analysis

Segmentation of basal ganglia based on T1-weighted MPRAGE images

Thalamus, striatum, and globus pallidus were automatically identified using a the MAGeT Brain algorithm16,17. In this approach, an a priori defined atlas is first registered to a representative subset of the dataset (21 subjects) using nonlinear transformations18. This set of subjects then serves as a set of templates and all other subjects are warped to these templates using non-linear registration, resulting in 21 candidate segmentations for each subject. Nonlinear registration was performed using a version of Automatic Normalization Tools (ANTs) registration that is compatible with the minc file format (https://github.com/vfonov/mincANTS). After data quality assessment of all attended scans, this resulted in a total number of MPRAGE scans analyzed of 20/17 (controls/patients) at baseline, 21/14 at 3-month, 21/17 at 6-month, 20/17 at 12-month and 21/13 at 24-month.

Vertex-wise surface area estimation

A quantitative surface-based methodology16 was used to estimate the shape of each structure at study. Atlas to subject transformations were applied to 3D surface models of each labelled atlas structure, resulting in 21 candidate surfaces for each subject. The final surface was developed by computing the median location of each vertex across the 21 candidate surfaces. Second, transformations from the 21 candidate segmentations were averaged within each subject and then across the template library to reduce noise16. Then, for each vertex, a third of the surface of each connecting triangle is assigned to the vertex surface area. A surface-base diffusion-smoothing kernel was then applied (5 mm and 3 mm for the thalamus/striatum and globus pallidus, respectively).

Microstructural analysis

MT-weighted, PD-weighted, and T1-weighted volumes were used to estimate quantitative MT, R1, and R2* maps as described previously15. R1 maps were corrected for radiofrequency transmit field inhomogeneities with UNICORT15. For each subject and time point, MT, R1, and R2* maps were coregistered to their respective T1-weighted image using a 6 parameter registration with a normalized mutual information cost function (https://github.com/CobraLab/minc-toolkit-extras/blob/master/bestlinreg_g). After coregistration, segmentations of the thalamus, striatum, and globus pallidus (including the subnuclei) obtained from MAGeT Brain were used as a binary mask to extract mean values of MT, R1, and R2* for each subject and time point.

The MPM protocol was not acquired in 3 controls at any time point and in 3 patients/1 healthy control at baseline, 6 patients at 3-month, 1 patient at 6-month, and in 4 patients at 24-month. After data quality assessment, this results in a total number of scans analyzed of 17/12 (patients/controls) at baseline, 11/17 at 3-month, 16/18 at 6-month, 17/17 at 12-month, and 13/18 at 24-month.

Statistics

R (R core team, 2015) was used for all statistical analysis. Clinical measures and vertex-wise shape measures were analyzed using mixed-model regression as it permits the inclusion of multiple measurements per person at different time points and at irregular intervals between measurements. We first compared rates of change of these measures between patients and healthy controls by including a group × time (reflecting degeneration/plasticity) and a group x squared time (reflecting acceleration/deceleration) interaction. For clinical measures, time was modelled on a log scale to account for non-linear recovery patterns. Age and gender were included to accommodate potential confounding effects of no interest. We also performed a within patient analysis to look at rates of change of vertex wise measurements between cervical and thoracic injuries. To do this, we performed a similar analysis to that described above, but with grouping being either cervical or thoracic as opposed to patient vs. control. To identify in which specific nuclei group differences were observed, we superimposed surface-labels of the cytoarchitectonic atlas for the thalamus19 on our thalamic template. Second, in those structures that showed group differences in surface area over time, we explored underlying differences in microstructure (R1, MT, R2*) using the same models. Associations between quantitative MRI parameters at 1-month (baseline) and clinical recovery at 2-years were investigated using linear regression models adjusted for age, gender and clinical baseline scores. All vertex-wise analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) at 10%.

Results

Demographics

We included a total of 17 SCI patients and 21 healthy controls. The mean age of patients did not differ from controls (p > 0.05). The baseline scan was acquired 1.4 ± 0.5 months after injury and the remaining scans at 3.5 ± 1.5, 7.1 ± 1.9, 13.3 ± 3.1 and 28.7 ± 5.1 months. Over 2-years, patients recovered by 2.76 points per log month on their lower extremity motor score [p = 0.001, 95% CI (1.07 4.45)], by 0.91 point per log month on their upper extremity motor score [p = 0.046, 95% CI (0.02 1.80)], and by 7.89 points per log month on their SCIM score (p < 0.001, 95% CI (5.03 10.75)) (Table 1). Light-touch and pin-prick score remained unchanged over time (p = 0.152, p = 0.790). For subject wise plots of trajectory of each clinical score, see Supplementary Information (Clinical Trajectories).

Table 1.

Clinical and epidemiological data for all patients included in the study.

ID Age at injury Initial Site of neurological Impairment (motor/sensory) INSCSCI upper extremity motor score (Baseline/24-months) INSCSCI lower extremity motor score (Baseline/24-months) INSCSCI light-touch score (Baseline/24-months) INSCSCI pin-prick score (Baseline/24-months) SCIM score (Baseline/24-months)
p1 18 C5/C4 19/22 0/0 24/30 27/32 4/22
p2 23 C7/C6 42/48 0/23 69/70 38/33 23/70
p3 68 T10/T10 50/50 2/31 78/74 75/65 41/46
p4 44 T12/T12 50/50 39/45 107/106 109/98 84/100
p5 42 C6/C6 23/26 0/0 27/21 20/17 18/41
p6 71 C7/C8 36/48 16/42 85/66 36/25 17/43
p7 20 C5/C5 21/21 0/0 21/45 19/18 4/39
p8 30 C7/C8 47/47 0/0 64/72 35/30 38/40
p9 52 T9 /T9 50/50 48/49 95/94 89/90 84/100
p10 42 C5/C4 41/36 46/48 104/99 104/96 99/100
p11 29 T11/T11 50/50 10/12 86/76 88/69 52/68
p12 71 T1/T10 50/50 43/50 88/93 72/67 47/69
p13 71 T1/T4 50/50 43/50 83/112 81/112 56/97
p14 73 T1/T11 50/50 0/0 75/71 77/72 28/36
p15 31 C4/C5 20/26 0/0 22/31 19/20 13/25
p16 28 C4/C3 15/10 0/0 14/23 14/23 16/20
p17 32 T1/T4 50/50 9/50 79/112 58/77 40/96

INSCSCI International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury; SCIM Spinal Cord Independence Measure.

Time course of thalamic changes

Both thalami showed a greater linear rate in surface area contractions in patients compared to controls over time within the inferior parts of the ventral anterior nuclei (VAN), and surface expansion within its superior parts (Fig. 1, Suppl. Table 1). In the left thalamus, these changes were levelling-off over time (Suppl. Fig. 1). In the ventral lateral nuclei (VLN), linear surface contractions were observed in its inferior parts, which levelled-off over time in the right nuclei. Greater linear rate in surface area expansions were found within the superior parts of the VLN in patients compared to controls over time. Greater linear rate in surface area expansions was evident within the ventral posterior nuclei (VPN) in patients compared to controls over time, which rate of change decelerated within the right VPN. Both pulvinar nuclei showed greater rate in linear surface contractions in patients compared to controls, in particular within the lateral and the medial pulvinar. Microstructural changes are summarized in Table 2. No significant difference in the rate of change were observed between patients with cervical or thoracic injuries.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linear shape differences within the thalamus estimated as surface area contractions and expansions. All surface area contractions (representing degeneration) are represented in blue, and all surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) are shown in red. Compared to controls, patients showed contractions of surface area within the inferior part of the ventral anterior and ventral lateral nuclei (motor nuclei) and within the pulvinar nuclei over the first 2-years after spinal cord injury. Surface area expansions were evident in the superior parts of the ventral anterior and ventral lateral nuclei (motor nuclei), as well as within the ventral posterior nuclei (sensory nuclei). Note that the borders of the thalamic subnuclei were identified using the atlas of Chakravarty et al. (2006). Colour bars denote the FDR threshold applied in both the positive (red, expansion) and negative (blue, contraction) directions. Plots B and C denote the surface area measurements across time at peak vertices denoted by the green (B) and yellow (C) markers, illustrating the different group trajectories.

Table 2.

Microstructural changes.

R1 (s−1) MT (p.u.) R2* (s−1)
Mean/(95% CI) p =  (mean/95% CI) p = p =  (mean/95% CI) p = 
Linear changes over time per month
Thalamus
 VAN
  Left − 6.527 (− 11.526 to 1.527) 0.011
 VLN
  Left − 6.054 (− 11.018 to 1.089) 0.017
  Right − 5.156 (− 9.760 to 0.552) 0.028
 VPN
  Left − 5.185 (− 10.214 to 0.157) 0.043
Striatum
 Ventral striatuml
  Left − 0.020 (− 0.039 to 0.001) 0.047
  Right − 0.017 (− 0.033 to 0.001) 0.037
 Pre-commissural caudate
  Left − 4.598 (− 8.887 to 0.308) 0.036 − 0.020 (− 0.038 to 0.003) 0.021
 Post-commissural caudate
  Left − 0.001 (− 0.001 to 0.001) 0.034
 Globus pallidus
  Left − 5.570 (− 10.728 to 0.411) 0.034
  Right − 5.674 (− 10.763 to 0.585) 0.029
Acceleration and Deceleration per month2
Thalamus
 VAN
  Left 0.193 (0.032 0.354) 0.019
 VLN
  Left 0.173 (0.0131 0.333) 0.034
  Right 0.159 (0.011 0.307) 0.036
Striatum
 Pre-commissural caudate
  Left 0.164 (0.025 0.303) 0.021
 Globus pallidus
  Left 0.178 (0.013 0.343) 0.034
  Right 0.187 (0.024 0.350) 0.024

Rates of changes of myelin-sensitive R1, MT and R2* in patients compared to controls over time. Negative numbers indicate linear decreases, respectively acceleration, in patients compared to controls, whereas positive values indicate linear increases, respectively deceleration.

Time course of striatal changes

In the striatum, patients showed bilateral surface area contractions and expansions over time in the caudate and the putamen compared to controls. Specifically, greater linear rate in surface area contractions were evident medially within the central to posterior part of the bilateral caudate (Fig. 2A), which levelled-off over time in patients compared to controls (Suppl. Fig. 2). Greater linear rate in expansions of surface area were observed in the bilateral inferior part of the anterior caudate (Fig. 2B), bilaterally levelling-off over time. Greater linear rate in expansions of surface area was observed in the inferior parts of the ventral caudate (i.e. nucleus accumbens; Fig. 2C), which showed a levelling-off over time at the left side only. Greater linear rate of surface area contractions was evident in the left lateral part of the anterior caudate (Fig. 2D). Within the putamen, greater rate of liner contractions of surface area were observed in the medial central (Fig. 2E) as well as the lateral anterior putamen, bilaterally (Fig. 2F). The surface area of the right lateral anterior putamen showed a levelling-off over time in patients compared to controls. In addition, surface area contractions were observed in the left medial posterior (Fig. 2G), left medial anterior (Fig. 2H) and left lateral superior posterior putamen (Fig. 2I). Expansions in surface area were detected within the left medial anterior (Fig. 2J) and lateral anterior putamen (Fig. 2K). Expansions within the left anterior putamen levelled-off over time in patients compared to controls. Microstructural changes are summarized in Table 2. No significant difference in the rate of change were observed between patients with cervical or thoracic injuries.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Linear shape differences within the striatum estimated as surface area contractions and expansions. All surface area contractions (representing degeneration) are represented in blue, and all surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) are shown in red. Compared to controls, patients showed contractions of surface area within the putamen, and the caudate, in particular in regions involved in sensorimotor and emotion processing, and in cognitive function over the first 2-years after spinal cord injury. Surface area expansions were evident in regions involved in cognition, emotion and reward processing. Note that the atlas on the right shows the somatotopy of the striatum, based on a review of functional MRI studies (Arsalidou et al. 2013). Labels therefore represent approximate regions of corresponding functions. Colour bars denote the FDR threshold applied in both the positive (red, expansion) and negative (blue, contraction) directions. Plots B and C denote the surface area measurements across time at peak vertices denoted by the green (B) and yellow (C) markers, illustrating the different group trajectories.

Time course of pallidal changes

The surface area analysis demonstrated no changes over time in patients compared to controls in the globus pallidus. Microstructural changes are summarized in Table 2. No significant difference in the rate of change were observed between patients with cervical or thoracic injuries.

Relationship of MRI parameters at 1-month post-SCI and clinical recovery at 2-years

Through running linear models at each vertex, we found that surface area measurements at baseline were significantly related to lower extremity motor score at the 2-year timepoint. Specifically, a cluster of voxels showing increased surface area expansions within the central caudate and the lateral central-posterior putamen at 1-month were associated with better lower extremity motor score at 2-years, adjusted for baseline score (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Relationship between 1-month structural and microstructural parameters and recovery at 2-years. Local morphological features of the striatum (motor region) at 1-month after spinal cord injury were associated with better lower extremity motor score at 2-years, adjusted for age, gender and baseline clinical score. (A) Vertices in red show a relationship of surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) with increased lower extremity motor score at 2-years, corrected at 10% FDR. For each of left (B) and right (C) striatum we plot surface area versus change in lower extremity motor score for a given vertex, denoted by green and yellow markers respectively. For the left striatum vertex, correlation was 0.52 (95% CI [− 0.03, 0.83]). For the right striatum, correlation was 0.61 (95% CI [0.096, 0.87]).

Discussion

This study characterizes neurodegenerative and reorganizational changes across the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit after SCI using advanced neuroimaging measures, in vivo. We demonstrate a dynamic pattern of neurodegenerative and reorganizational changes in the basal ganglia-thalamus circuitry within the first 2-years post-SCI, its magnitude predicting functional recovery. These observations illustrate the enduring neurodegenerative and neuroplastic processes induced by a SCI and highlight a progressive diaschisis across the neuroaxis.

Time course of thalamic changes

We have previously shown in the same patient cohort that a focal injury to the spinal cord produces neurodegenerative changes to the sensorimotor and limbic system10,11,13. Moreover, the atrophic thalamus showed also an accumulation of iron content, however the exact location of these changes was not identified13,20. This study shows that SCI leads to bilateral surface area contractions in the inferior parts of the VAN and VLN, while surface area expansions were evident in the superior parts of the VAN, VLN and VPN. The changes in all of these nuclei were paralleled by decreases in myelin-sensitive R1 over time.

Both, the VAN and VLN receive input from the globus pallidus and project to the premotor and motor cortex21. In contrast, the VPN receives input from the lemniscus medialis (transmitting light touch, vibration, and proprioception) and from the spinothalamic tract (transmitting pain and heat sensation)21. All of these nuclei are somatotopically organized21 with distal muscles represented dorsal to those for proximal limb portions; and more cranial representations were found more anterior22. This suggests that the contracting surface area (i.e. local volume decreases) within the lower limb representing areas in motor thalamic nuclei are likely neurodegenerative changes while surface area expansions (i.e. local volume increases) in upper limb representing areas of sensorimotor thalamic nuclei could be interpreted as compensatory changes on the assumption that performance improvements during training23,24 or neurorehabilitation24,25 induces grey matter volume increase.

Possible biological substrates for local volume decreases (i.e. surface area contractions) might include changes in the number of neurons induced by trans-synaptic degeneration, neuronal death, demyelination, synaptic pruning, or changes in the number of glial cells26. Axonal sprouting and activity-dependent plasticity27 might account for volume increases (i.e. surface area expansions). In particular, compensatory use of the upper limbs might drive expansion of cortical M1 hand area into output-deprived leg area28 as a consequence of the rewired hind limb neurons onto cervical motor circuits28; the same mechanism might also be occurring in the basal ganglia. However, surface area changes are not specific to any single pathological process. Here we show that changes in myelin-sensitive R129 values might be interpreted as ongoing demyelination in the sensorimotor nuclei of the thalamus.

The lateral and medial pulvinar nuclei also showed surface area contractions over time. These nuclei are involved in visual attention regulation, and also coordinate sensory input with its corresponding motor response30. As most SCI patients have motor and sensory deficits, it seems likely that the coordination between these two modalities is also altered31. In addition, SCI patients rely more on their visual input in order to coordinate limb movements due to impaired proprioception32.

Time course of striatal changes

Surface area contractions were also observed in striatal regions involved in sensorimotor and cognition processing, and surface area expansions in regions involved in cognition, emotion and reward processing4,33. These changes were paralleled by decreases in myelin-sensitive R1 and MT. Interestingly, we observed bilateral surface area contraction within the medial and lateral dorsal part of the motor putamen, and as the putamen consists of two sets of somatotopic representation34. This indicates loss of afferents from both the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. This is in line with previous studies, showing that both of these structures show altered function and structure after SCI20,35. Remarkably, we also observed surface area expansions in the ventral striatum (i.e. nucleus accumbens), a region known to be involved in recovery of the dexterous finger movements after experimental SCI4,36.

Time course of pallidal changes

We observed decreases in myelin-sensitive R1 changes in the globus pallidus. Since the globus pallidus is the relay station between the striatum and the thalamus, trans-synaptic degeneration of afferents and efferents of the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex may primarily lead to changes in the striatum and the thalamus.

Effect of rostro caudal level of spinal injury on neurodegeneration

Analyzing thoracic and cervical SCI patients conjointly allows to address (i) to what extent the level of lesion and consequently the extent and kind of neurological-functional impairment are related to secondary structural changes within the extrapyramidal system, and (ii) whether some secondary effects are independent of the amount and level of spinal cord damage. As in other neurological disorders, even a very local and focal lesion can have remote effects, i.e. diaschisis)37,38. The fact that we did not detect a relationship between lesion level and extrapyramidal changes indicates that these remote structural changes are likely trans-synaptic and might be a general effect due to the loss of voluntary control over the limbs. This is also reflected by the association between early surface area expansion and lower limb recovery.

Relationship of MRI parameters at 1-month post-SCI and clinical recovery at 2-years

Clinical recovery occurs most rapidly within the first 6 months and is fostered through neurorehabilitation by promoting cortical, subcortical and spinal cord neural circuit reorganisation39,40. Interestingly, early surface area expansions within the motor striatum were associated with better 2-year lower extremity motor score. Although all patients of the present study were admitted for neurorehabilitation within one months after the injury, there is an inherent variability (depending on lesion level and extent of impairment) of how much therapy each individual patient received already at this early timepoint. Thus it remains speculative if the expansion of surface area is indicative of compensatory plasticity—a phenomena also observed in Multiple sclerosis41 and Parkinson’s disease42 or whether it is a co-occurrence. However, our study shows the clinical viability of MRI based structural shape measures for monitoring and predicting recovery after traumatic SCI. For example these neuroimaging biomarkers could be used to assess the influence of therapeutic interventions (e.g. levodopa (L-Dopa)) on training effects druing rehabilaition not only after SCI43 but also stroke44 or other disorders where the extrapyramidal system is affected. Its future application holds promise to provide a tool to improve our understanding of the disease mechanism after SCI and might render extrapyramidal neuroimaging biomarkes. These new insights will enable us to better predict individual recovery trajectories and identify those patients who could profit from targeted interventions, such as levodopa. However, further investigations are required to assess the interplay between function, the underlying neuropathology and treatment response.

Limitations

First, although we identified the approximate location of changes within the striatum and the globus pallidus, a histology-based atlas of the striatum and the globus pallidus is currently not available. Next, the upgrade of the MRI scanner might potentially be a confounding factor, but this was mitigated by the fact that all participants were scanned before and after the upgrade. Although the mean age of the control cohort was not significantly different from the patient cohort we included age as a (nuisance) covariate, and its inclusion made no material difference to the results (e.g. the relevant coefficient for the subject indicator terms in the repression models). Finally, the applied MPM protocol, consisting of MT, R1 and R2* measures, provides only indirect measures of myelin45 and iron46 but not specific to processes such as demyelination, degeneration and iron content.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence for progressive extrapyramidal macro- and microstructural changes after SCI, indicating large scale, trans-neuronal remodeling of primarily unaffected brain regions. Extrapyramidal plasticity early after SCI are associated with long-term motor recovery. This study therefore provides unbiased, quantitative readouts of nuclei-specific extrapyramidal changes which are clinically eloquent.

Supplementary information

Supplementary file1 (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants for taking part in this study, as well as the staff of the Department of Radiology and Neurology at the University Hospital Balgrist for their help in acquiring the MR images. In addition, we thank Jürgen Germann for valuable discussions, and Gabriel A. Devenyi for his technical assistance. A previous version of this paper was published as part of the thesis “Tracking structural changes in the spinal cord and brain as biomarkers for interventions after spinal cord injury” by Dr Eveline Huber (2018). This study was made possible by support from ‘The Oxford McGill ZNZ Partnership in the Neurosciences’ which provided a funding for mobility and training. This study was further supported by Wings for Life, Austria (WFL-CH-007/14), the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (IRP- P158), the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 681094 (‘NISCI’) and the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) under contract number 15.0137, the Clinical Research Priority Program (CRPP) Neurorehab UZH, the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/(ERC grant agreement no. 616905), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under support code 01EW1711A & B in the framework of ERA-NET NEURON. The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from the Wellcome Trust 0915/Z/10/Z. P.F. is funded by a SNF Eccellenza Professorial Fellowship grant (PCEFP3_181362/1). We thank SciNet for usage of Canada’s largest supercomputer platform, which is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, NSERC, the Government of Ontario, Fed Dev Ontario, and the University of Toronto. MMC receives salary support from the Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé (Junior 2 program) and research funding from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the McGill University Healthy Brain for Healthy Lives program (a Canada First Research Excellence Fund).

Author contributions

E.H., M.C., N.W. and P.F. were involved in the concept and design of the study. Analysis of data was conducted by E.H. and R.P. Data were discussed and interpreted by E.H., R.P., M.H., M.C. and P.F. E.H. and P.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-70805-5.

References

  • 1.Freund P, et al. MRI in traumatic spinal cord injury: from clinical assessment to neuroimaging biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:1123–1135. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.David G, et al. Traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury: pathological insights from neuroimaging. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0270-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaaimi B, Edgley SA, Soteropoulos DS, Baker SN. Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain. 2012;135:2277–2289. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sawada M, et al. Function of the nucleus accumbens in motor control during recovery after spinal cord injury. Science. 2015;350:98–101. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cramer SC, Lastra L, Lacourse MG, Cohen MJ. Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Brain. 2005;128:2941–2950. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Min Y-S, et al. Alteration of resting-state brain sensorimotor connectivity following spinal cord injury: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurotrauma. 2015;32:1422–1427. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;31:195–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weiskopf N, Mohammadi S, Lutti A, Callaghan MF. Advances in MRI-based computational neuroanatomy. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2015;28:313–322. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tabelow K, et al. hMRI: a toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research. Neuroimage. 2019;194:191–210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Freund P, et al. MRI investigation of the sensorimotor cortex and the corticospinal tract after acute spinal cord injury: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:873–881. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70146-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grabher P, et al. Tracking sensory system atrophy and outcome prediction in spinal cord injury. Ann. Neurol. 2015;78:751–761. doi: 10.1002/ana.24508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seif M, Ziegler G, Freund P. Progressive ventricles enlargement and cerebrospinal fluid volume increases as a marker of neurodegeneration in patients with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurotrauma. 2018 doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ziegler G, et al. Progressive neurodegeneration following spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2018;90:e1257–e1266. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tardif CL, Collins DL, Pike GB. Sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry analysis to choice of imaging protocol at 3 T. Neuroimage. 2009;44:827–838. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiskopf N, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD(*), MT, and R2(*) at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front. Neurosci. 2013;7:95. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chakravarty MM, et al. Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34:2635–2654. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pipitone J, et al. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage. 2014;101:494–512. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakravarty MM, et al. Comparison of piece-wise linear, linear, and nonlinear atlas-to-patient warping techniques: analysis of the labeling of subcortical nuclei for functional neurosurgical applications. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009;30:3574–3595. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chakravarty MM, Bertrand G, Hodge CP, Sadikot AF, Collins DL. The creation of a brain atlas for image guided neurosurgery using serial histological data. Neuroimage. 2006;30:359–376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jutzeler CRRCR, et al. Association of pain and CNS structural changes after spinal cord injury. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:18534. doi: 10.1038/srep18534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nambu A. Somatotopic organization of the primate basal ganglia. Front. Neuroanat. 2011;5:26. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2011.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vitek JL, Ashe J, DeLong MR, Alexander GE. Physiologic properties and somatotopic organization of the primate motor thalamus. J. Neurophysiol. 1994;71:1498–1513. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.4.1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Draganski B, et al. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature. 2004;427:311–312. doi: 10.1038/427311a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sehm B, et al. Structural brain plasticity in Parkinson’s disease induced by balance training. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Villiger M, et al. Relationship between structural brainstem and brain plasticity and lower-limb training in spinal cord injury: a longitudinal pilot study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015;9:254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hains BC, Black JA, Waxman SG. Primary cortical motor neurons undergo apoptosis after axotomizing spinal cord injury. J. Comp Neurol. 2003;462:328–341. doi: 10.1002/cne.10733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;2:263–273. doi: 10.1038/35067570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ghosh A, et al. Rewiring of hindlimb corticospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 2010;13:97–104. doi: 10.1038/nn.2448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lutti A, Dick F, Sereno MI, Weiskopf N. Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination. Neuroimage. 2014;93:176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cappe C, Morel A, Barone P, Rouiller EM. The thalamocortical projection systems in primate: an anatomical support for multisensory and sensorimotor interplay. Cereb. Cortex. 2009;19:2025–2037. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ionta S, et al. Spinal cord injury affects the interplay between visual and sensorimotor representations of the body. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:20144. doi: 10.1038/srep20144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Curt A, Van Hedel HJA, Klaus D, Dietz V. Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. J. Neurotrauma. 2008;25:677–685. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arsalidou M, Duerden EG, Taylor MJ. The centre of the brain: Topographical model of motor, cognitive, affective, and somatosensory functions of the basal ganglia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34:3031–3054. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tokuno H, et al. Corticostriatal projections from distal and proximal forelimb representations of the monkey primary motor cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1999;269:33–36. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00401-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hou J-M, et al. Brain sensorimotor system atrophy during the early stage of spinal cord injury in humans. Neuroscience. 2014;266:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nishimura Y, et al. Neural Substrates for the Motivational Regulation of Motor Recovery after Spinal-Cord Injury. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carrera E, Tononi G. Diaschisis: past, present, future. Brain. 2014;137:2408–2422. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Freund P, et al. Embodied neurology: An integrative framework for neurological disorders. Brain. 2016;139:1855–1861. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Courtine G, et al. Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 2008;14:69–74. doi: 10.1038/nm1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bareyre FM, et al. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat. Neurosci. 2004;7:269–277. doi: 10.1038/nn1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hier DB, Wang J. Reduced cortical surface area in multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Res. 2007;29:231–232. doi: 10.1179/174313206X154003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Worker A, et al. Cortical thickness, surface area and volume measures in Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maric O, Zörner B, Dietz V. Levodopa therapy in incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1303–1307. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lokk J, Salman Roghani R, Delbari A. Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa coupled with physiotherapy on functional and motor recovery after strok—a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2011;123:266–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01395.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schmierer K, Scaravilli F, Altmann DR, Barker GJ, Miller DH. Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. Ann. Neurol. 2004;56:407–415. doi: 10.1002/ana.20202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Langkammer C, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of brain iron: a postmortem validation study. Radiology. 2010;257:455–462. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary file1 (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES