Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Genomic Heterogeneity Between Eastern and Western Patients

Abstract

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA), a global health problem, is increasing in incidence and has differing etiologies worldwide. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly being incorporated into the clinical management of biliary cancers. IHCCA is enriched with actionable mutations, and there are several promising targeted therapies under development. NGS data from Asia, where IHCCA is most prevalent, are limited.

METHODS

Comprehensive genomic profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from 164 Asian and 283 Western patients with IHCCA was performed using NGS. We measured the distribution of DNA repair genetic aberrations (GAs) in IHCCA, along with actionable mutations. Also, we evaluated the association between DNA repair GAs and tumor mutation burden (TMB). Based on the TMB status, patients were distinguished into 3 levels: low (< 6 mut/Mb), intermediate (6-10 mut/Mb), and high (TMB-H; ≥ 10 mut/Mb).

RESULTS

Seventy-two percent of Asian patients had ≥ 1 actionable GA, with a significantly higher frequency in KMT2C, BRCA1/2, and DDR2 compared with Western patients (P = .02, .003, and .003, respectively); 60.9% of Western patients had ≥ 1 actionable GA and higher frequency of CDKN2A/B and IDH1/2 GAs (P = .0004 and < .001, respectively). GAs in nuclear factor kappa B pathway regulators and DNA repair genes occurred more frequently in Asian patients (P = .006 and .001, respectively). There was a higher frequency of TMB-H in Asian compared with the Western cohort (12.2% v 5.9%; P = .07).

CONCLUSION

A higher burden of DNA repair mutations and frequency of patients with TMB-H in the Asian IHCCA cohort compared with the Western patients suggests a potential role for DNA repair and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Asian population. Future clinical trials should account for this genetic heterogeneity.

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a global health problem, constitutes about 10%-20% of all primary liver cancers worldwide. Geographic variation in CCA incidence has been attributed to differing risk factors in the affected population. In Western countries, including the United States, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis C, and alcohol abuse are the main CCA risk factors, and the age-standardized incidence rate is 1.6 per 100,000.¹ The incidence in Southeast Asia is extremely high, up to 71.3 per 100,000 in certain parts of Asia, and is associated with liver fluke and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.²

CONTEXT

• Key Objective

• We compared the genomic landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Asian and Western patients with this disease using next-generation sequencing. These differences may have therapeutic implications.

• Knowledge Generated

• Asian patients harbored a higher rate of DNA repair gene mutations compared with Western patients. Actionable driver gene alterations were more common in the Western patients. However, high tumor mutation burden (TMB) value (> 10 mut/Mb) was significantly more common in Asian patients than in their Western counterparts. Patients with high TMB had alterations in direct DNA repair genes and caretaker genes, especially in the Asian population.

• Relevance

• These results may reflect differences in disease etiology and are relevant for targeted therapy and immunotherapy trials for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Notably, there is an increasing incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA) worldwide, and its etiology is unclear.³ Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment, but the majority of patients present with an advanced disease stage and have a limited therapeutic options. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been rapidly incorporated into the clinical management of CCA, particularly in the United States. IHCCA, in particular, is enriched with a relatively high number of actionable mutations, and early reports indicate several promising leads with targeted therapies for fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 fusion (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1), BRAF V600E mutations, and HER2/neu amplification.² Nevertheless, NGS data from Asia, where CCA is most prevalent, are limited. These data are critical toward development of targeted therapies for this disease.

CCA genetic profiling studies have identified genetic diversity between intrahepatic and extrahepatic subtypes. Similarly, there appears to be genetic diversity between liver fluke and nonliver fluke–associated CCA in Asia.⁴ In this study, we explored the genomic heterogeneity of IHCCA between Asian and Western populations using a targeted NGS platform.

METHODS

Comprehensive genomic profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue blocks from the primary tumor or metastatic lesions obtained from patients with IHCCA was performed in 283 patients from a single center in the United States and in 164 patients from China. In the United States, all genomic profiling analysis was performed using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-validated platform (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA). In China, genomic profiling was performed by using another CLIA-validated targeted sequencing platform (OrigiMed, Shanghai, China).⁵ A bridging study comparing the 2 platforms indicated high concordance (96.3%; 26/27) for the same study samples (results indicated in Appendix Table A1). All study-enrolled patients signed a consent form allowing the release of their tissue blocks to be tested. All FFPE tissue blocks were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and reviewed by an expert pathologist to confirm the diagnosis and presence of least 20% of the DNA derived from tumor cells. This research was approved by the institutional review boards at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Peking Union Medical College.

Hybrid Selection and Sequencing

A custom hybridization capture panel including over 23,660 individually synthesized 5′-biotinylated DNA 120 bp oligonucleotides was used to target the exons of cancer-related genes, as well as selected introns of genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Hybridization capture followed the protocol of Hybridization capture of DNA libraries using xGen Lockdown Probes and Reagents (Version 3; Integrated DNA Technologies, San Diego, CA). Postcapture libraries were mixed together, denatured, diluted, and then sequenced. For the purpose of estimation of sequencing error rate, a PhiX spike-in was added as an external control to measure the percentage of reads with 0-4 mismatches, following the method described by Manley et al.⁶

Bioinformatics Pipeline

All types of genetic alterations, including single-nucleotide variant (SNV), short and long indels, copy number alterations (CNAs), and gene rearrangement, were called using a suite of bioinformatics pipelines.⁵ Analysis of SNVs and indels began with the alignment of raw reads to the human genome reference sequence (hg19) with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (v0.62; BWA, Cambridge, MA), followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) duplicates removal using MarkDuplicates algorithm from Picard (version 1.47; Cambridge, MA). Local realignment and base quality recalibration for SNVs were performed using GATK (v3.1-1; Cambridge, MA) and subsequently called by MUTECT (v1.7; Cambridge, MA). The CNAs included: (1) amplification, defined as an increase in the number of gene segment copies by ≥ 8, and (2) homozygous deletion, defined as decrease of complete loss of gene segment copies in samples with > 20% purity. To identify these alterations, tumor cellularity was estimated by allele frequencies of sequenced single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). For detection of gene rearrangement, aligned reads with abnormal insert size of > 2,000 or zero bp were collected and used as discordant reads, that is, paired-end reads that could not be closely mapped to a genome reference, with each read of paired reads aligned to the same chromosomes or different chromosomes. Originally, the discordant reads with the distance less than 500 bp formed clusters were further assembled by fermi-lite to identify potential rearrangement breakpoints. The breakpoints were double confirmed by BLAT, and the resulting chimeric gene candidates were annotated.

Oncogenic Genetic Mutations

Statistical analysis was only based on oncogenic genetic variants and the variants of unknown significance; low-frequency (variant allele frequency < .01) variants were excluded. Oncogenic criteria included: (1) known pathogenic: oncogenic mutations supported by specific functional studies; (2) likely pathogenic: specific functional studies exist on the mutations situated on the same genome loci and structural disrupting mutations on tumor suppressor genes, such as truncations, splicing sites, and frameshifts; (3) confirmed somatic: somatic mutations recorded on the public genomic database, such as COSMIC, and detected at least once in any tumor types.

Tumor Mutation Burden

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was estimated for 157 US patients and 164 Chinese patients with IHCCA by counting its somatic mutations, including coding SNVs and indels per megabase of the sequence examined. Driver mutations and known germline alterations in dbSNP were not counted. We classified our patients according to the TMB scores into: (1) TMB low (TMB-L) if the number of mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) was < 6, (2) TMB intermediate (TMB-I) if the number of mutations per megabase was between 6 and 9, and (3) TMB high (TMB-H) if the number of mutations per megabase was ≥ 10. The TMB cutoff was defined per prior lung cancer trials.^7,8

Microsatellite Instability

We determined the microsatellite instability (MSI) status in all patients with detectable TMB status. According to the MSI score, we classified the samples as MSI high (MSI-H), defined as instability in ≥ 2 microsatellite loci; MSI low, defined as instability in only 1 loci; and microsatellite stable, defined as absence of any evidence of microsatellite loci instability. If the results for a sample were ambiguous, the analysis was performed a second time. PCR validation confirmed the diagnosis of MSI-H.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS, Armonk, NY). P values < .05 were considered significant. We used χ² test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. A box and whisker plot was performed to determine the distribution of TMB among Western and Asian patients with IHCCA.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

The mean age and standard deviation was 59.6 ± 9.9 and 58.3 ± 12.5 years for the Chinese and US cohorts, respectively. Among the Chinese cohort, 61.6% were male, with a significantly higher male-to-female ratio (1.6:1) compared with the US cohort. Although 74.2% of US patients were White, 53 (18.8%) of patients were non-White, including 20 (7.1%) Hispanics, 18 (6.4%) Asians, 14 (4.9%) Blacks, and 21 (7.5%) were other. The majority of the patients had stage III and IV disease, with no significant differences between the US (77%) and Chinese (78%) patients. However, there was a higher proportion of patients with stage I and II disease in the US and Chinese cohorts, respectively. The percentage of HBV-positive patients were higher in the Chinese cohort than in the US cohort. Furthermore, the Chinese patients had a significantly higher rate of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma compared with their US counterparts (P = .002; Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Demographics for Chinese and US Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Western Versus Asian NGS Comprehensive Genomic Profiling

Comprehensive genomic profiling identified 1,007 genetic aberrations (GAs) in Chinese patients compared with 971 GAs in US patients (Appendix Table A2). Each patient harbored at least 1 GA, with an average of 6.1 (range, 1 to approximately 20) and 3.4 (range, 1 to approximately 16) GAs per tumor in Chinese and US patients, respectively. As indicated in Figure 1, the most commonly reported GAs in Chinese patients were tumor protein 53 (TP53; 41.5%), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS; 28.7%), AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A; 18.3%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A and 2B (CDKN2A/B; 15.2%), and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2; 13.4%). For the US patients, they were CDKN2A/B (30%), IDH1/2 (23.3%), TP53 (20.8%), ARID1A (19.8%), and fibroblast growth factor receptors FGFR1-4 (17.7%). Among the Chinese patients, 118 (72.0%) had at least 1 actionable GA, with a significantly higher frequency in KMT2C, BRCA1/2, and DDR2 compared with US patients (P = .02, .003, and .003, respectively). In the US patients, 154 patients (60.9%) had at least 1 actionable GA, with significantly higher frequency of CDKN2A/B and IDH1/2 GAs (P = .0004 and < .001, respectively; Table 2; Fig 1)

FIG 1.

(A) The main graph shows the most common alterations of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA). Each gene is separately stated in China (n = 164) and the United States (n = 283). (B) The affiliated chart indicates the alterations among direct and caretaker DNA repair genes. Mutations are colored according to mutation types of substitution/indel, gene amplification, gene homozygous deletion, truncation, and fusion/rearrangement. Alteration types are presented in the color key at the bottom.

TABLE 2.

Variations in the Genomic Aberrations Among Chinese and US Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

GAs in nuclear factor kappa B pathway regulators and DNA repair genes occurred more frequently in Chinese patients (P = .006 and .001, respectively; Fig 2). In our cohorts, we defined DNA repair genes to include the 20 most frequent previously reported DNA repair gene GAs, including direct DNA repair genes (ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCD2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, POLD1, POLE, PRKDC, RAD50, and SLX4) and caretaker genes (BAP1, CDK12, KMT2C/MLL3, TP53, and BLM).⁹ Remarkably, Chinese patients harbored more DNA repair GAs compared with US patients with IHCCA, with predominant GAs in TP53, BRCA1/2, KMT2C, and RAD50. GAs in BLM, POLD1, PRKDC, and SLX4 were not identified in either cohort. (Table 2; Fig 1)

FIG 2.

(A) The distribution of tumor mutation burden (TMB) value and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in Chinese and US patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (B) Modulator genes of dysregulation pathways or gene subgroups with statistically significant levels between the 2 cohorts. Mutation types are presented in the color key at the bottom. MSS, microsatellite stable; mut/Mb, mutations per megabase.

Additionally, in the Chinese cohort, 10.4% of patients had TMB-H, 13.4% had TMB-I, and 76.2% had TMB-L compared with 5.7% with TMB-H, 15.3% with TMB-I, and 79% with TMB-L among US patients (P = .18, 0.45, and 0.65, respectively). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the median values of TMB-H, TMB-I, and TMB-L groups among the Chinese (14, 8, and 2 mut/Mb, respectively) and US patients with IHCCA (19, 7, and 3 mut/Mb, respectively). Moreover, we identified that the rate of MSI-H in Chinese and US patients was 1.8% (n = 3) and 0.6% (n = 1), respectively, and all MSI-H patients were associated with high TMB values (Fig 2).

We explored the association between DNA repair gene GAs and TMB, and identified a significantly higher rate of TMB-I and TMB-H in patients who had combined direct and caretaker DNA repair GAs compared with patients without DNA repair GAs among the Chinese (P < .001) and US (P = .05) patients with IHCCA. This was particularly notable with alterations of both direct and caretaker DNA repair gene alterations (Table 3; Fig 3).

TABLE 3.

Association Between DNA Repair GAs and TMB Among Chinese and US Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

FIG 3.

(A) The rate of levels through separating into tumor mutation burden high (TMB-H; (≥ 10 mut/Mb), TMB intermediate (TMB-I; 6-10 mut/Mb) and TMB low (TMB-L; ≤ 6 mut/Mb). (B) The correlation between TMB status and DNA repair genetic aberrations (GAs) by presenting the rates of TMB levels in different existence patterns of direct DNA repair GAs and caretaker GAs.

DISCUSSION

IHCCA is an aggressive disease with limited treatment options. The advent of NGS offers promising breakthroughs with targeted therapy and immunologic interventions. However, it is important to identify genomic heterogeneity between populations because this will have a significant impact on precision medicine approaches for this cancer.

In our study, we performed comprehensive molecular profiling of 164 Chinese and 283 US patients with IHCCA to explore genomic heterogeneity between populations. We noted important differences between Asian and Western patients with IHCCA. Through the results, Chinese patients had significantly higher frequency of TP53 as well as KMT2C, BRCA1/2, DDR, TERT, TGFBR2, RBM10, NF1, SPTA1, and RB1 GAs. In the Western cohort, GAs in IDH1/2, BAP1, and CDKN2A/B were more dominant. This genetic diversity could be attributed to variations in the underlying disease risk factors (Table 2). In Western countries, CCA is associated with metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and hepatolithiasis, whereas liver fluke and HBV are important risk factors in Asian countries. A previous study suggested that fluke-related CCAs are enriched with ERBB2 amplification and TP53 mutation, whereas fluke-negative CCAs have a higher rate of IDH1/2, BAP1, FGFR/PRKA GAs, and programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.^10,11 Furthermore, in a recent genetic profiling study of 103 Chinese patients with IHCCA, it was noted that TP53 mutations were more commonly seen in HBV-related IHCCA, whereas KRAS mutation was more likely occur in HBV-negative IHCCA.¹²

Moreover, our data demonstrated an overall high frequency of DNA repair GAs: in 62.6% of Chinese patients and 45.9% of US patients. Dysregulation of DNA repair pathway is often associated with accumulation of several GAs and higher TMB. Highly mutated tumors harbor neoantigens, which make them more responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This has also been demonstrated in a previous study of lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibition for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma conducted by our group. In this study, high TMB was associated with longer progression-free survival.¹³ Also, pembrolizumab has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the DNA mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d) cancers based on a phase II clinical trial that showed a 40% objective response rate and 78% progression-free survival rate in patients with colorectal cancer with MMR-d compared with 0% and 11%, respectively, for MMR-proficient patients.¹⁴ Similar results have been achieved in noncolorectal cancers that included 4 patients (44%) with biliary tract cancer. Furthermore, it has been recognized that specific somatic mutations could lead to alteration in the immune biomarker expression. For instance, BRCA1/2 mutated high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma had significantly higher CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, as well as elevated PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, in tumor-associated immune cells compared with tumors without BRCA1/2 mutations.^15,16 In our study, Chinese patients had significantly higher BRCA1/2 GAs (8.5%) compared with Western patients (1.8%).

We classified our patients based on the TMB score, and we considered TMB to be high if it was ≥ 10 mut/Mb based on results of the recently published CheckMate 568 trial that demonstrated 44% overall response rate in patients who had TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb when treated with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab (irrespective of PD-L1 expression).⁷ In our study, a minority of patients with IHCCA were TMB-H (12.2% and 5.9% in Asian and Western cohorts, respectively). Additionally, a significant association between DNA repair GAs and TMB-H and TMB-I has been determined. The role of combined poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors in advanced solid tumor is currently under investigation and may be applicable to this subgroup.

Our study has important limitations. We obtained the comprehensive genetic alteration data employing 2 targeted gene panels. In these panels: (1) the content genes had some dissimilarities; to address this issue, we filtered out differential genes and only included the 320 overlapped genes into the analysis, thereby ensuring the comparability; (2) sequencing platforms were Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) for FoundationOne and NovaSeq (Illumina) for OrigiMed450, with effective depths of 500× and 700×, both reflecting the accuracy of sequencing results¹⁷; (3) the TMB algorithm of OrigiMed450 was based on the published algorithm of FoundationOne, and the genomic alterations were selected similarly¹⁸; (4) the OrigiMed450 platform uses blood samples from individual patients as their own control for eliminating the impact of germline polymorphisms, whereas FoundationOne uses the somatic-germline-zygosity algorithm and databases of dbSNP and ExAC for the same, and finally; and (5) we conducted a bridging study comparing the 2 platforms and showed a high degree of concordance. Despite these differences, we do not believe that the results are affected in a meaningful way by the differing platforms and are consistent with earlier reports. Furthermore, we have examined the clinical characteristics of the Chinese and US patients and demonstrated that demographic differences between these populations were minor, with most patients having an advanced disease stage. There was a higher proportion of hepatitis B exposure in the Asian cohort, and the pathophysiologic relationship between the viral infection and somatic mutations in cancer is unknown at this time. Future studies to investigate the genomic profiling in different populations, taking into consideration the disease risk factors, are warranted. Data regarding PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were not available; therefore, we could not identify variations in immune biomarker expression between the 2 cohorts in this study. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate genomic profiling variations between Asian and Western patients with IHCCA, and our data are likely to be informative toward future precision medicine trials for this cancer.

APPENDIX

Methods

We identified 10 patients who had been sequenced using the FoundationOne platform; of these, 7 with adequate cellularity were chosen for analysis. The respected blocks were sectioned at 5 µm; the tumor content size and were confirmed by a trained pathologist, and a minimum of 5 unstained slides were submitted for confirmation using the OrigiMed platform. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. A high degree of concordance was noted between the platforms, as indicated in Table A1.

TABLE A1.

Result of Actionable Alternation Between OrigiMed and FoundationOne Sequencing Platform

TABLE A2.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identified 1,007 GAs in Chinese Patients Compared With US Patients

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Siqin Liu, Reham Abdel-Wahab, Junjie Xu, Qiang Li, Jinwei Hu, Mitesh J. Borad, Kai Wang, Milind Javle, Haitao Zhao

Administrative support: Jingyu Cao, Jing Hu, Maolin Yan

Provision of study materials or patients: Qiang Li, Jianzhen Lin, Lawrence N. Kwong, Haitao Zhao

Collection and assembly of data: Jingyu Cao, Jing Hu, Siqin Liu, Reham Abdel-Wahab, Qiang Li, Maolin Yan, Yujie Feng, Jianzhen Lin, Lawrence N. Kwong, Jinwei Hu, Fernando Carapeto, Milind Javle, Haitao Zhao

Data analysis and interpretation: Siqin Liu, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Reham Abdel-Wahab, Qiang Li, Songhui Zhao, Jian Wang, Lawrence N. Kwong, Jinwei Hu, Mitesh J. Borad, Milind Javle

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Funda Meric-Bernstam

Employment: MD Anderson Cancer Center

Honoraria: Sumitomo Group, Dialectica

Consulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Inflection Biosciences, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Clearlight Diagnostics, Darwin Health, Samsung Bioepis, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Aduro Biotech, OrigiMed, Xencor, Debiopharm Group, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, Silverback Therapeutics, Immunomedics, IBM Watson Health, F. Hoffman-LaRoche, IBM Watson Health, PACT Pharma, Effector Therapeutics

Speakers' Bureau: Chugai Biopharmaceuticals

Research Funding: Novartis (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Calithera Biosciences, Debiopharm Group (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Aileron Therapeutics (Inst), PUMA Biotechnology (Inst), CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), Jounce Therapeutics (Inst), Zymeworks (Inst), Curis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Effector Therapeutics (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (I), Guardant Health (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Seattle Genetics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Songhui Zhao

Employment: OrigiMed

Lawrence N. Kwong

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Sarepta Therapeutics

Research Funding: Array BioPharma

Mitesh J. Borad

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead Sciences, AVEO, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals

Consulting or Advisory Role: G1 Therapeutics, Fujifilm (Inst), Agios (Inst), Insys Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), ArQule (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Inspyr Therapeutics, Halozyme (Inst), Pieris Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Immunovative Therapies, Exelixis, Lynx Group, Genentech, Western Oncolytics, Klus Pharma, Denovo, Merck, Imvax

Research Funding: Boston Biomedical (Inst), miRNA Therapeutics (Inst), Senhwa Biosciences (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), BiolineRx (Inst), Agios (Inst), Halozyme (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Threshold Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Toray Industries (Inst), Dicerna (Inst), Sillajen (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Isis Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Sun Biopharma (Inst), ARIAD (Inst), ImClone Systems (Inst), QED Therapeutics (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Adaptimmune (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), RedHill Biopharma (Inst), Basilea (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: ArQule, Celgene, AstraZeneca

Kai Wang

Employment: OrigiMed

Leadership: OrigiMed

Milind Javle

Consulting or Advisory Role: Qed, Oncosil, Incyte, Mundi

Other Relationship: Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, BeiGene, QED Therapeutics, Bayer

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.