Skip to main content
JCO Precision Oncology logoLink to JCO Precision Oncology
. 2019 Jul 11;3:PO.19.00048. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00048

STRN-ALK Rearranged Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma With Dramatic Response Following Ceritinib Treatment

Jan H Rüschoff 1, Elise Gradhand 2, Abdullah Kahraman 1, Helen Rees 3, Jane L Ferguson 4, Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro 1, Martin Zoche 1, Holger Moch 1, Bart Vrugt 1,
PMCID: PMC7446511  PMID: 32914035

INTRODUCTION

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare neoplasm arising from the mesothelial cell lining of the pleura (80% to 90%), but it can also develop in the peritoneum (10% to 15%), pericardium, and tunica vaginalis.1,2 Because of the long latency of the disease, the age at diagnosis ranges from 54 to 65 years3-5; thus, MM rarely occurs in young patients and children. The frequency of both pleural and peritoneal MM is almost equal in patients younger than age 40 years. In addition, previous asbestos exposure is less common in peritoneal compared with pleural MM.6 Peritoneal mesothelioma commonly presents with vague and unspecific symptoms, including abdominal distension and weight loss.7 Consequently, the diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma generally is made at an advanced stage of the disease,8 which partly explains the poor clinical outcome, even after optimal oncologic and surgical treatment. The median survival is less than 12 months in the majority of patients.9,10 Patients with MM are not routinely analyzed for the presence of potentially drug-targetable gene mutations, including anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase (ALK). By using targeted next-generation sequencing of tumor DNA and RNA, Hung et al11 recently identified ALK rearrangements with three novel ALK fusion partners in a small subgroup of patients with peritoneal MM. Fusion partners were ATG16L1, STRN, and TPM1. ATG16L1-ALK, STRN-ALK, and TPM1-ALK fusions were all in-frame alterations. The ALK breakpoint was mapped to intron 19 in all three cases, the STRN breakpoint to intron 3, the ATG16L1 breakpoint to intron 2, and the TPMI1 breakpoint to the beginning of exon 9.

Here we report a 13-year-old girl with peritoneal mesothelioma harboring an STRN-ALK gene fusion, which was identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). The patient demonstrated a dramatic response with marked clinical improvement after treatment with ceritinib.

CASE REPORT

A 13-year-old previously healthy girl presented to her general physician with a 4-month history of increasing abdominal girth. She felt otherwise well, although her appetite had reduced slightly, and she was attending school as usual and continuing her sports activities. On admission to the hospital, significant ascites was noted, and a magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrated extensive peritoneal disease. Images before treatment showed large-volume ascites, bilateral hydronephrosis, and widespread peritoneal soft tissue deposits particularly within the pelvis and around the liver with scalloping of the liver margin (Fig 1). She had no history of asbestos or radiation exposure. Peritoneal biopsies were obtained by an explorative laparoscopy and submitted for a histologic and molecular work-up.

FIG 1.

FIG 1.

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans of the abdomen before and at 6 weeks and 12 weeks after starting ceritinib. Images before treatment demonstrate large-volume ascites, bilateral hydronephrosis, and widespread peritoneal soft tissue deposits particularly within the pelvis (all findings marked by green arrows). Follow-up imaging 1 month after treatment was started showed a significant reduction in tumor bulk in these areas and reduction in volume of ascites. Hydronephrosis has resolved. At 12 weeks after treatment, there is a further reduction in the volume of peritoneal disease and ascites.

PATHOLOGY

Multiple peritoneal biopsies revealed a tumor with a mixed tubulopapillary and solid growth pattern. Immunohistochemistry with positivity for CK5/6 and calretinin in the absence of expression of the epithelial marker BerEp-4 and claudin-4 confirmed the mesothelial origin of the tumor. Even though necrosis and mitotic activity (less than 1 mitosis per 10 high-power fields) were not evident, growth pattern, cytonuclear atypia of the tumor cells, and immune profile fulfilled the criteria for malignant epithelioid mesothelioma (Figs 2A and 2B). Immunohistochemistry showed retained expression of BAP-1, p16, and MTAP protein, whereas a CDKN2A fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed no loss of the 9p21 chromosome.

FIG 2.

FIG 2.

(A) Peritoneal biopsy with a neoplasm showing a tubulopapillary and solid growth pattern (original magnification ×5). (B) Higher magnification (original magnification × 20) shows relatively bland tumor cells with slightly irregular nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. Hematoxylin and eosin stain was used for (A) and (B).

COMPREHENSIVE GENOMIC PROFILING

To identify drug-targetable mutations, CGP using next-generation sequencing using FoundationOne (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) was performed on the exons of 315 cancer-associated genes.12 In addition, intronic regions of 28 genes that are known to be involved in somatic rearrangements were sequenced, and the microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden were assessed.13 The sequencing analysis identified an isolated STRN-ALK rearrangement and three variants of unknown significance, namely FGFR2 (c.1562A>G, p.D521G), KMT2D (c.5077C>T, p.R1693W), and PRKDC (c.6206G>A, p.R2069Q). Mutational burden was low (three mutations per megabase pair), and microsatellites were found to be stable. Genetic alterations in the NF2 gene were not detected nor were additional oncogenic drivers known to be present in malignant mesotheliomas (Fig 3). Subsequently, the STRN-ALK rearrangement was validated by immunohistochemistry showing strong protein expression of ALK (clone 5A4; Fig 4A). A FISH analysis revealed a 5′ ALK deletion in 96% of the tumor cells (Fig 4B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3.

Next-generation sequencing data showing the STRN-ALK fusion. (A) Alignment of 176 paired-end reads spanning both breakpoints in STRN and ALK are shown on the human reference genome (hg19). Position of depicted genomic regions are labeled in blue at the top. The breakpoints in STRN and ALK were found in intron 3 (chr2:37,134,246-37,134,536) and intron 19 (chr2:29,447,483-29,447,805), respectively. (B) Schematic representation of the STRN-ALK fusion showing the 700-amino-acid (AA)-long fusion gene, with 137 AAs originating from the N terminus of STRN and the remaining 562 AAs originating from the C terminus of ALK. Although the Striatin domain in the STRN-ALK fusion is likely nonfunctional because of its premature truncation at its C-terminal region, the tyrosine kinase domain of ALK remains intact.

FIG 4.

FIG 4.

(A) Immunohistochemical staining showing strong expression of ALK protein (original magnification ×40). (B) ALK fluorescent in situ hybridization break-apart probes showing one fused red-green signal and one red signal in 96% of the tumor cells compatible with 5′ ALK deletion (original magnification ×100).

TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP

After the histologic diagnosis was established, the patient was initially treated with four cycles of cisplatin and pemetrexed without clinical or radiologic response. She was reviewed by a national peritoneal mesothelioma surgical team who staged her laparoscopically and deemed her case not amenable to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Therefore, palliative care with ascites drainage (6 L/week) was provided. Molecular testing by CGP was attempted to obtain possible options for targeted treatment. After the STRN-ALK rearrangement was detected, treatment was started with off-label oral ceritinib 450 mg once per day. Follow-up imaging 6 and 12 weeks after the start of treatment demonstrated a significant reduction in the previously observed abdominal mass and resolution of ascites and hydronephrosis. At 3 months after treatment, there was a further reduction in the volume of peritoneal disease and ascites (Fig 1). Except for a transient and self-limiting rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), no adverse effects were noted.

DISCUSSION

We report a dramatic tumor regression after the first cycle of ceritinib in a 13-year-old girl with ALK-rearranged peritoneal MM. The ALK receptor can be translocated, mutated, or overexpressed in non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs), and anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (ALCLs).14 It is well known that pediatric patients with IMTs or ALCL can show strong and sustained clinical response to the inhibitory effects of the ALK-targeting drug crizotinib.15 Peritoneal MM is an extremely rare tumor in children, but an almost complete response to an ALK-targeting drug has never been described before. Recently, Loharamtaweethong et al16 reported a 10-year-old girl with an ALK-translocated peritoneal MM detected by FISH and immunohistochemistry, but the exact fusion partner was not determined. This patient received combined treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine, which resulted in stable disease but not remission. This patient strengthens the importance of access to specific drugs for rare tumors with rare molecular alterations. Rearrangements in the ALK gene have been identified in a small subset of patients with peritoneal MM and are thought to be involved in its pathogenesis. Peritoneal MM with ALK rearrangements most often occurs in female patients younger than age 40 years with no history of asbestos exposure or radiotherapy. Genetic alterations frequently seen in pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, including CDKN2A, BAP-1, NF2, and SETD2, are not detected in patients with ALK-rearranged disease.11 Even though the prevalence of ALK-rearranged peritoneal mesotheliomas is low, ALK alterations seem to be restricted to peritoneal mesothelioma only and do not occur in pleural MM. By using ALK FISH, Salvi et al17 were unable to detect ALK translocations in 106 patients with pleural mesothelioma with different histologic subtypes (epithelioid [n = 60], sarcomatoid [n = 34], and biphasic [n = 12]). This is consistent with our observation, because we were unable to demonstrate ALK expression in a tissue microarray containing tumor samples from 221 patients with pleural mesothelioma, including 22 females of whom three were younger than age 40 years (unpublished data).

In our patient’s tumor sample, we identified a rare ALK fusion by CGP. The platform used in this study can detect all ALK alterations (including ATG16L1 and TPM1 fusions) and has been extensively validated.12 Even in ALK FISH-negative patients, ALK rearrangements could be identified by using this method.18 In our patient, we detected an STRN-ALK fusion with similar breakpoints but with a fusion protein identical to that in the ALK-rearranged patient described by Hung et al.11 The STRN-ALK fusion was an in-frame alteration with breakpoints for STRN in intron 3 and ALK in intron 19.

Patients with ALK-rearranged MM cannot be distinguished from their conventional counterparts, but the differences in clinical presentation (young patients with no history of asbestos exposure) and the detection of isolated ALK mutations would justify a separate tumor entity of ALK-rearranged mesothelioma. In the absence of genetic alterations of CDKN2A, BAP-1, NF2, and SETD2, it is tempting to speculate that fusions involving the ALK gene may represent the predominant oncogenic driver in peritoneal MM in young female patients. On the basis of the success of therapeutic ALK inhibition in our patient, ALK fusion screening by CGP is highly advised in peritoneal MMs, especially in young patients. The promising response in our patient also stresses the need for investigations involving a larger cohort of young female patients with ALK-rearranged peritoneal MM to determine the efficacy and durability of ALK inhibition. However, such a clinical trial is difficult to perform, given the rarity of this MM subtype. Alternative approaches for obtaining the data needed regarding response to ALK inhibitor therapy in this rare entity could be a search within international cancer registries, such as the European Platform on Rare Disease Registration, or inclusion of ALK-rearranged peritoneal MM into basket trials for variable ALK-rearranged neoplasia (eg, lung cancer, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors). Positive response to ALK inhibition in a larger cohort of patients with peritoneal mesotheliomas would justify a separate entity of ALK-rearranged MM in a future WHO classification.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Jan H. Rüschoff, Elise Gradhand, Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro, Martin Zoche, Holger Moch, Bart Vrugt

Administrative support: Holger Moch

Provision of study materials or patients: Elise Gradhand, Helen Rees, Martin Zoche, Bart Vrugt

Collection and assembly of data: Elise Gradhand, Abdullah Kahraman, Helen Rees, Jane L. Ferguson, Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro, Holger Moch

Data analysis and interpretation: Elise Gradhand, Abdullah Kahraman, Jane L. Ferguson, Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro, Holger Moch

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center.

Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro

Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals

Martin Zoche

Research Funding: F. Hoffmann-La Roche

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: F. Hoffmann-La Roche

Holger Moch

Honoraria: Roche

Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Definiens

Research Funding: Roche (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Pharma

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Definiens

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ray M, Kindler HL. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: An update on biomarkers and treatment. Chest. 2009;136:888–896. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moolgavkar SH, Meza R, Turim J. Pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in SEER: Age effects and temporal trends, 1973-2005. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:935–944. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9328-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beebe-Dimmer JL, Fryzek JP, Yee CL, et al. Mesothelioma in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare investigation of treatment patterns and overall survival. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:743–750. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S105396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salamalekis E, Kairi E, Bettas P, et al. Malignant mesothelioma of the peritoneal cavity. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1997;18:141–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Asensio JA, Goldblatt P, Thomford NR. Primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A report of seven cases and a review of the literature. Arch Surg. 1990;125:1477–1481. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410230071012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas A, Chen Y, Yu T, et al. Distinctive clinical characteristics of malignant mesothelioma in young patients. Oncotarget. 2015;6:16766–16773. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Acherman YI, Welch LS, Bromley CM, et al. Clinical presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma. Tumori. 2003;89:269–273. doi: 10.1177/030089160308900307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaya H, Sezgi C, Tanrikulu AC, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival in 35 patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Neoplasma. 2014;61:433–438. doi: 10.4149/neo_2014_053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sugarbaker PH, Yan TD, Stuart OA, et al. Comprehensive management of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Magge D, Zenati MS, Austin F, et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1159–1165. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3358-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hung YP, Dong F, Watkins JC, et al. Identification of ALK rearrangements in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:235–238. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1023–1031. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fabrizio DA, George TJ, Jr, Dunne RF, et al. Beyond microsatellite testing: Assessment of tumor mutational burden identifies subsets of colorectal cancer who may respond to immune checkpoint inhibition. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9:610–617. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.05.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hallberg B, Palmer RH. Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:685–700. doi: 10.1038/nrc3580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mossé YP, Voss SD, Lim MS, et al. Targeting ALK with crizotinib in pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: A Children’s Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3215–3221. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Loharamtaweethong K, Puripat N, Aoonjai N, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation in paediatric malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report of novel ALK-related tumour spectrum. Histopathology. 2016;68:603–607. doi: 10.1111/his.12779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salvi S, Varesano S, Boccardo S, et al. FISH analysis of crizotinib target genes ROS1/ALK/MET in malignant mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:e116–e118. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ali SM, Ou SHI, He J, et al. Identifying ALK rearrangements that are not detected by FISH with targeted next-generation sequencing of lung carcinoma J Clin Oncol 322014suppl; abstr 8049) [Google Scholar]

Articles from JCO Precision Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES