Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0235355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235355

Influence of Funneliformis mosseae enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) on Phaseolus vulgaris L. under salinity stress

Nashwa El-Gazzar 1,*, Khalid Almaary 2, Ahmed Ismail 3, Giancarlo Polizzi 4
Editor: Ying Ma5
PMCID: PMC7446817  PMID: 32817671

Abstract

The Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) (Funneliformis mosseae), are the most widely distributed symbiont assisting plants to overcome counteractive environmental conditions. In order to improve the sustainability and the activity of AMF, the use of nanotechnology was important. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) on the activity of AMF in common bean roots as well as its activity under salinity stress using morphological and molecular methods. The activity of AMF colonization has increased in the presence of TiO2NPs especially for arbuscule activity (A%), which increased three times with the presence of TiO2NPs. The improvement rate of Funneliformis mosseae on plant growth increased from 180% to 224% of control at the lowest level of salinity and increased from 48% to 130% at higher salinity level, respectively. The AMF dependencies for plant dry biomass increased in the presence of TiO2NPs from 277% in the absence of salinity to 465 and 883% % at low and high salinity levels, respectively. The presence of AMF co-inoculated with TiO2NPs resulted in increasing the salinity tolerance of plants at all levels and reached 110% at salinity level of 100 mM NaCl. Quantitative colonization methods showed that the molecular intensity ratio and the relative density of paired inocula AMF Nest (NS) or chitin synthases gene (Chs) with TiO2NPs were higher significantly P.>0.05 than single inoculants of AMF gene in roots under the presence or the absence of salinity by about two folds and about 40%. Hence, the positive effect of TiO2NPs was confined to its effect on AMF not on bean plants itself.

Introduction

Soil salinity is one of the detrimental biotic stresses; which influences plant growth and crop production worldwide. At the physiological scale, soil salinity reverses ionic and water homeostasis [1]. However, at a cellular level, it leads to boosted accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The raised ROS level adversely affects the cellular redox homeostasis, consequently commanding with “oxidative damage”. Sundry molecular regulators can be applied to broaden salt-tolerant genotypes [2]. Therefore, development of crop production in saline soils is very necessary; soil salinity is one of the major problems for agriculture in Egypt as Egyptian lands are subjected to extreme climatic factors such as high temperatures and drought. Under these conditions, dissolved salts may accumulate in soils because of the insufficient leaching of ions. Only few crop species are adapted to saline conditions. Hence, studies aiming at development of plant agriculture in saline soils are needed [3]. It is obvious that there is a need to continue research to find out non-traditional and novel protocols for overcoming salt stress; plants have evolved complex mechanisms that contribute to the adaptation to salinity conditions [4]. This study is an endeavor to improve the propagation of the plant Phaseolus vulgaris under salinity conditions by both, Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs.

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi are used to improve plant propagation in saline soils. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is known as the mother of the plant roots in natural ecosystems and enables the plants to cope with a biotic and biotic stresses [5]. AMF have been reported to be involved in nutrient use efficiency, photosynthesis and plant metabolism [6]. The symbiosis with AMF can ameliorate the plants response to salinity and have beneficial effects on plant growth and yield; this symbiosis was reported to reduce Na+ uptake and translocation and induce the uptake of K+, Ca+ and Mg+2 and stimulate the K+/Na+ and Mg+2/Na+ ratios in shoots [7].

Nanotechnology is used recently to overcome many agricultural problems. Metalic nano-particles enhance the seed germination, shot/root growth, biomass production and physiological activates [8]. In a previous study [9], it was showed that uptake of cucumber plants by 0 to 750 mg/Kg TiO2NPs increased the chlorophyll content of leaves; the cucumber fruits obtained after 150 days of cultivation were found to be richer with 35% potassium and 34% more phosphorus compared with the fruits from the control plants. It was found that TiO2NPs (500mg/L) improved the nitrates absorption by many plants and favor the conversion of inorganic nitrogen to organic nitrogen in the form of protein and chlorophyll which lead to an increase in the fresh weight and dry weight of the plant [10].

The recent perspectives have been raised that TiO2NPs may positively affect crops and soil microbial communities, including beneficial microbes such as AMF [11]. In addition, it was proved that nanoparticles have positive effects on microbial communities and the ecosystem services [12,13]. Also, previous studies have simultaneously examined the effects of NPs on both plant growth and rhizosphere microbial communities [14]. Previous literature confirmed that the application of nanoparticles at concentrations of 5, 25 and 50 ppm was found to stimulate the formation of mycorrhizae in seedlings of pedunculate oak, with the highest effect at intermediate concentrations (25 ppm) [15]. However, the influence of nanoparticles on plant growth and rhizospheric microbial communities, especially the important symbiotic microbes, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)fungi, remains under debate [16].Thus, considering its multifaceted effects, precise optimizations of doses and modes of TiO2NPs applications are required, before its applications could be recommended at a wider scale on crop plants [17]. In addition, further studies with primers that specifically target AMF are required [18].

In a previous study that carried out previously [19] using the same experimental mycorrhizal strain tested (AMF) investigated the effect of such mycorrhiza fungus to red kidney and wheat plants in enhancement their activity to heavy metal-polluted soil. The mycorrhizal plants showed increasing in their dry weight, height, chlorophyll, sugar and protein content, nitrogen and phosphorus efficiencies, leaf conductivity, transpiration rate, nitrogenous, acid and alkaline phosphates activities of all plants irrespective of the presence of heavy metal. To extend and develop the role of this experimental mycorrhiza used the enhancement plant production; the effect of this AMF on Phaseolus vulgaris grown in saline soils was studied either singly or in combinations with TiO2NPS using morphological, physiological and molecular methods through the detection of intensity and relative density of nest and ChS genes in the Funneliforms mosseae.

Materials and methods

Source of mycorrhiza, pot and potting mixture

The AMF used in this study was used in a previous study that carried out in our laboratory of Mycology, Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University [19]. This AMF was originally provided by Prof. Dr. Gamal Abdel Fattah Ouf, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Egypt. It was stored at 20 oC as colonized root fragment in sandy loamy soil sample taken from the rhizosphere region of the plant guania grass (Megathyrsus maximus) in plastic bag (250/500 cm3 bag) (Gomhuria Comp., Cairo, Egypt). To stimulate the AMF, five pots, each containing 950g sandy loamy soil were prepared and each soil fraction was mixed 50g soil that contained AMF and cultivated with Megathyrsus maximus irrigated with water every one week for two months [20]. The shoot system was as cut and the remained root systems were mixed with the soil and about 10g aliquots were used as an inoculum for further experiments.

Soil and mature seeds of the examined plant

Sandy loamy soil samples (1 kg aliquots in 2000 cm3 bags disposable) (Gomhuria Company. Cairo, Egypt) were collected from reclaimed soil at (0–20 cm) in the Sharkia province, Egypt and autoclaved twice at 121°C (15-lbs/in2) for one hour. These serial soil samples were put in serial pots that were sterilized by UV-radiation chamber for 12h. The soil was analysed as follows: physical analysis was done as described by [21], sand 80%, silt 15% and clay 5%. Chemical analysis was done according to [21,22]as nitrogen 0.85g/Kg, potassium 0.186g / kg, phosphorus 0.32g / kg and a pH at (7.9).

Seeds of a local variety of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were obtained from Agronomy Department, Agriculture Research Centre, Giza, Egypt. They were surface sterilized with 0.01% HgCl2, washed 3–4 times with distilled water and sown in black plastic pots containing 2000 g of soil [23].

Biosynthesis and characterization of TiO2NPs

Biosynthesis of TiO2NPs was produced using Aspergillus flavus KF946095 [24], following the method described in the literature [25]. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)was used for characterization of TiO2NPs on Joel 1230 operated at 100KV connected with CD camera, Japan. TEM analysis was done at National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt. Sizes of TiO2NPswere determined using Zeta sizer Nano series (Nano ZS) (Malvern, UK), at Regional Center for Food and Feed, ARC, Giza, Egypt. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) (Thermo Nicolet model 6700 spectrum) detected the presence of functional groups of amino acids as protecting agents to TiO2NPs Located at Micro-analytical Center, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt [26].

Preparation of biosynthesized TiO2NPs solution and salt solutions

The biosynthesized TiO2NPs100mg /kg of soil was dissolved in Tris-HCl buffer (pH = 8),and the solution was stirred vigorously and suspended in 400 mL of Milli-Q deionized water by sonication in a water bath for 30 min at 30°C with occasional stirring [27,28]. The solutions were then centrifuged at 8500 rpm for 30 min and then, washed with water before dispersing in water (pH = 7). TiO2NPs suspensions were applied twice after seed germination [29]. Salt solutions were applied after seed germination at concentrations of about 0, 100 and 200 mM of NaCl. Control treatments were irrigated with dist de-ionized water.

Experimental design and layout

The experiment was carried on 6 replications from each treatment. The treatments are given in Table 1. Treatments and controls were allowed for growth of Phaseolus vulgarius for 3 months.

Table 1. Different treatments allowed for growth of Phaseolus vulgarius.

Treatments
1 common bean control (P) non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)
2 TiO2NPs non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)
3 NaCl 100mM non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)
4 NaCl 200mM non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)
5 TiO2NPs + NaCl 100mM non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)
6 TiO2NPs + NaCl 200mM non-inoculated with F mosseae (NM)
Inoculated with F. mosseae (M)

Seeds of common beans were sown in plastic pots containing soil and were thinned to 5 plants per pot after one week of germination. The plastic pots were placed in a growth chamber at 25/20°C day/night, 11 h day, with 60–70% of relative humidity and water to 75% of WHC 2 times week. The plants were harvested 90 days after sowing date. Observations were recorded at 45 and 90 days of inoculation as the following:

AMF (colonization and mycorrhizal dependency)

The whole plant was used for biomass measurement after 45 and 90 days of sowing. The plant samples were washed with distilled water to remove the adhering soil particles and separated from the above-ground parts and the root parts. Firstly, samples were air-dried in cool and well ventilating places. The weighed subsamples of fresh roots and leaves were used for root mycorrhizal colonization by morphological and molecular methods and acid and alkaline phosphatase activity assessment [30]. Root samples were collected at an interval of 45 days, AMF colonization of root was examined after staining with 0.5% trypan blue in lactophenol [31] method. Root segments, each approximately 1-cm long, were selected at random from a stained sample and mounted on microscopic slides. Slides with stained root segments were carefully observed using the microscope under suitable magnification. Percent Mycorrhizal root colonization (Frequency of mycorrhizal infection F%, Mycorrhizal intensity M% and Arbuscular activity A%) was determined by gridline intersect slide method [32]. Spores produced by AMF in the root zone soil were estimated by wet sieving and decanting method [20]. The mycorrhizal dependency (MD) and of plants were calculated as described previously [33].

Acid &Alkaline phosphatase activity analysis

Fresh leaves were harvested from the selected plants treated with various amendments for leaf estimation of enzymes including, acid and alkaline phosphatase [34] at 45th and 90th day of experimentation.

Dry biomass and protein analysis

Plant samples were air-dried in cool and well ventilating places, then they were oven dried (68°C ±2°C, 24 h). The dry weight of each part was weighed to calculate the biomass. In addition, a known weight of fresh leaf or root tissues was used for soluble protein analysis according to [26,35,36].

Plant macronutrient contents analysis

The total (P) of shoot and root dried plant samples was determined by the method described previously [37]. Minerals content in dried samples were determined by the method of [38], potassium (K+), and sodium (Na+) were determined spectrophotometrically in the acid digested samples by using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Model Unicam 969). Total N was measured in the shoot and root samples of 0.1 g dry mass using the Kjeldahl method [39]. DNA extraction, detection of AMF in plant roots by nested and Chitin synthase, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

DNA isolation

DNA was extracted from 0.5 to 1.0 g of fresh roots according to the modified method of Dellaports et al. [40]. Plant roots were grinded to powder using liquid nitrogen, re-suspended in extraction buffer (6.25 mM potassium ethyl xanthate, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 700 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8) and incubated at 65°C for 1 h. Plant and fungal DNA was extracted (1v:1v) with phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and once with chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) [41]. DNA was precipitated with isopropanol (1v:1v) and 3M sodium acetate pH 5.2 (1v:1/10v) for 1 h at room temperature and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 25 min. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried under vacuum (Concentrator 5301 Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and re-suspended in 50 μl of ultrapure water and stored at 20°C for further use.

PCR amplification for screening the potential activity, intensity and relative density of mycorrhizal genes

The genes coding for NS1 and NS8 and genes coding for ChS F and R was used as molecular markers to screen mycorrhizal gene activity and intensity as described previously [42]. Based on the conserved sequence of the NS1 gene, Oligo primers NS1-F (5-GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC-3) and NS8-R (5-TCCGCA GGTTCACCTACGGA-3) that were designed and synthesized as described previously [43]. The ChS gene primers, OligoChS-F were (5-CTC AAG CTT ACT ATG TAT AAT GAG GAT-3) and ChS-R were (5-GTT CTC GAG TTT GTA TTC GAA GTT CTG-3) according to [44]. The fungal isolates were initially screened by PCR for the presence of the nested gene. PCR amplification was carried out using the primers NS1-F and NS8-R in a 25ll reaction mixture. The PCR reaction mixture contains 10 μl of 2× PCR master mixture (i-Taq™, Cat. # 25027, INTRON Biotech), 2 μl of (10 ng) DNA, 1 μl of forward and reverse primers (10 pmol/μl) and the mix was completed to 20 μl with sterile distilled water. PCR amplification was performed at Thermal Cycler 006 (A&E Lab Co. Ltd. England), programmed to initial denaturing step at 94°C for 2 min, denaturing at 94°C for 20 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, extension at72°C for 1 min, for 35 cycles and final extension for 5 min at 72°C. The PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel, visualized by gel documentation [41].

Gel electrophoresis

Genomic DNA samples, as well as nesting PCR amplification products, were separated on 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel. Agarose gel 1.5% (w/v) was used for nesting PCR amplification products comparing to the DNA ladder (1 kb Nex-gene Ladder, Puregene). The negative control PCR reactions without fungal g DNA were used. The amplicons were visualized by gel documentation system (VilberLourmat, France). Electrophoresis was carried out and visualized under 300 nm UV light.

Amplified genes activity

Electrophoresis amplicons were documented using an imaging system (Molecular Imager, Gel-Doc XR, BIORAD, USA) for detecting the genes expression activity (Intensity & Relative density). DNA profiles were acquired with the Image Master VDS system and analyzed using the Image J Master 1D Elite software (Amersham Bioscience, ColognoMonzese, Italy).Quantities and intensity of genes after PCR productwere measured according to the following equation; Relative expression of NS genes = Area (Mean) of the gene of treated/ control = x fold ratio. By this way, arbuscular mycorrhiza relative density (AMRD) was calculated for each treatment in roots as follows: AMRDR (root) = (Molecular ratio of each fungus in root x root dry weight) [45].

Statistical analysis

The differences between means were compared using Fisher’s least significant differences test (LSD) with the statistical WASP software version 2.0; LSD: At significant level (P>0.05).Sample symbols (a.a): mean non significant difference (a.b): mean significant difference [46]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on measured parameters of common bean plants under salinity stress in response to treatments with AMF and TiO2NPsData of growth, physiological parameters and mycorrhiza levels in common bean plants inoculated with AM Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs in the presence of salinity were subjected toanalysis of variance (ANOVA) [47].

Results

The results exhibited that the morphology of biologically synthesized TiO2NPs by A. flavusKF946095 were oval, cubic and rod-shaped (Fig 1A) with diameter of about 68 nm (Fig 1B).To further validate the presence of stabilizing proteins, TiO2NPs were analyzed by FTIR, that confirmed the presence of various functional groups at 1633.41cm-1, 1458.89cm-1, 1078.51cm-1, 3430.74cm-1and 2366.23cm-1corresponding to carbonyl residues and peptide bonds of proteins responsible for the synthesis of the TiO2NPs(Fig 1C). The peaks were classified along with the functional groups (Table 2).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Characterization of TiO2NPs: (A) TEM of TiO2NPs with oval, cubic and rod-shaped, (B) Zeta sizer of TiO2NPs at 68nm and (C) FTIR of TiO2NPS.

Table 2. Classification of FTIR beaks of TiO2NPS.

FTIR peaks (cm-1) Classification
1 3430.74 N-H stretching (aliphatic amine) peptide bonds of proteins and carbonyl residues
2 2925.48 C-H stretching alkyne
3 2366.23 O = C = O carbon dioxide
4 1633.41 C = C stretching alkene, carbonyl residues
5 1458.89 C-H alkane, carbonyl residues and peptide bonds of proteins
6 1118.51 C-O stretching secondary alcohol mononuclear aromatics and carbonyl residues
7 870.703 C-H Bending
8 615.181 C = C alkene
9 462.832 C = C alkene

Data presented in Table 3 showed that frequency of mycorrhizal root segments (F %), the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in root tissues (M %) and arbuscule frequency in root systems (A %) increased in the response to TiO2NPs irrespective to presence and absence of salinity stress. The values of F%, M% and A% increased from 87, 31 and10.9% in absence of TiO2NPs into 96, 45.5 and21.8% (P> 0.05) respectively in the presence of TiO2NPs.

Table 3. Effect of salinity levels on AMF development (as indicated by trypan blue staining) and Mycorrhizal Dependency (MD) of mycorrhizal, and non-mycorrhizal plants supplemented with and without TiO2NPs.

Periods (days) F% M% A% MD
Treatments 45 90 45 90 45 90 90
P Nm - - - - - -
M 85 87 34.3 31.85 10.8 10.9 254
TiO2NPs Nm - - - - - -
M 65 96 32 45.4 12.6 21.8 277
NaCl 100mM Nm - - - - - - -
M 78 59 15.2 12.8 6.1 5.95 369
NaCl 200mM Nm - - - - - - -
M 70 47 13.2 10.8 4.5 3.95 358
TiO2NPs + NaCl 100mM Nm - - - - - - -
M 83 90 20.3 29.6 9.6 16.8 465
TiO2NPs + NaCl 200mM Nm - - - - - - -
M 80 84 15.7 21.3 6.8 10.7 883

F% Frequency of mycorrhizal root segments, M% intensity of mycorrhizal colonization, A% arbuscule frequency in root systems. NM; Non-mycorrhizal plants and M; Mycorrhizal plants.

The data also showed that the mycorrhizal association with common bean plants was significantly influenced by salinity. The mycorrhizal infection was reduced from 87% to 59% and 47% at low and high salinity respectively in the absence of TiO2NPs and from 96% to 90% and 84% at the same levels in the presence of TiO2NPs.The presence of salinity reduced mycorrhizal intensity (M %) by about 60% and 66% (P> 0.05) at low and high salinity respectively in the absence of TiO2NPs.This reduction was significantly inhibited in the presence of TiO2NPs reaching to 35% and53% (P> 0.05) for two levels of salinities (low and high) respectively. Arbuscule frequency in root systems (A %) exhibited similar trends where the A % was greatly reduced by about 45% and 64% of its activity under the two levels of salinity in absence of TiO2NPs.While this reduction was significantly inhibited to 23% and51% at the two salinity levels in the presence of TiO2NPs. On the other hand, the results of mycorrhiza development at the end of the experiment (90 days) were higher than that at 45 days in the presence of TiO2NPs especially in the presence of salinity.

The data in Table 3 indicated that mycorrhizal dependencies for plant dry mass increased by raising salinity. The increase varied from 254% in absence of salinity into 369 and358%(P> 0.05) at the two salinity levels, respectively in the absence of TiO2NPs. While in the presence of TiO2NPs the increase varied from 277% in the absence of salinity to 465 and883% % (P> 0.05) at low and high salinity levels, respectively.

The results obtained in this study, (Fig 2A–2E) showed a mature vesicular at 90 days, AMF around and inside common bean plants are roots, intraradical mycelium with vesicular and symbiotic phase of Funneliformis mosseae in common bean plants roots with TiO2NPs, respectively. Colonization of AMF in roots of common bean plants in the presence and the absence of salinity stress showed in (Fig 3A–3E).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Inoculation of common bean plants roots with AMF and TiO2NPs showing: (A) mature vesicles at 90 days; (B) Arbuscular; (C) vesicles of AMF around and inside roots; (D) intraradical mycelium with vesicles; (E) symbiotic phase of AMF in roots.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Colonization of AMF in roots of common bean plants in the presence and the absence of salinity stress: (A) mature arbuscule at 90 days; (B) arbuscular; (C) symbiotic phase of AM in roots (20X); (D) intraradical mycelium; (E) arbuscule of AMF under salinity stress at 90 days; (F) arbuscule, vesicles and intraradical mycelium of AMF with TiO2NPs under salinity stress.

The results given in Table 4 showed that the dry weight of common bean plants colonized by Funneliformis mosseae was higher than non-mycorrhizal plants either in normal or saline conditions. The results also showed that the presence of Funneliformis mosseae improved the growth of the plant, both in the normal or saline conditions, where the improvement rate was 154% (P>0.05) than the control (Non AMF plants) in normal circumstances. While, at a low level of salinity, the presence of AMF was able to remove the negative effect of salinity. The results showed that the negative effect of salinity at a low level (-24% of control) in the absence of AMF was reversed in the presence of AMF. Where, the salinity effect alleviated and the growth rate improved by 180% (P>0.05) in relative to control. Also, at higher level of salinity, the growth increased from– 59% into 48% when compared to control. The results given in Table 4 also indicated that AMF supplemented with TiO2NPs increased the rate of plant growth, regardless of the presence of salinity or not, where the improvement rate increased from 154% to 195% than that in control in the absence of salinity. While the improvement rate increased from 180% to 224% (P>0.05) at the lowest level of salinity and increased from 48% to 130% at the highest salinity level. By examining the results illustrated in Table 4, it was found that the rate of improvement of plant growth in the saline environment in the presence of mycorrhiza and TiO2NPs is better than that obtained by mycorrhiza alone. While, TiO2NPs alone do not have a significant effect on the plant growth in this conditions. These results indicated that the growth improvement in the common bean plants in the saline environment were due to the effect of TiO2NPs on the activity of mycorrhiza and not on the plant itself, suggesting that the effectiveness of TiO2NPs in mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Table 4. Effect of salinity levels on dry wt, TI, efficiency of inoculants and TiO2NPs concentration of mycorrhizal, and non-mycorrhizal plants supplemented with and without TiO2NPs.

Periods Dry Wt. g Efficiency of inoculants Tolerance index % Tio2NPs concentrations
Treatments Root Shoot T.F.
P. Control NM 4.6
M 11.7 154
TiO2NPs NM 4.9 6 0.53d 0.77a 1.45
M 13.6 195 0.66b 0.42c 0.63
NaCl 100mM NM 3.5 -24 76 - -
M 12.9 180 110 - -
NaCl 200mM NM 1.9 -59 38 -
M 6.8 48 58 - -
TiO2NPs+100mMNaCl NM 3.2 -37 65 0.47d 0.79a 1.68
M 14.9 224 110 0.92a 0.47a 0.51
TiO2NPs+NaCl200mM NM 1.2 -74 24 0.11e 0.78a 7.1
M 10.6 130 78 0.91c 0.48ab 0.52
LSD (P>0.05) 0.54 0.026 0.054

Efficiency of inoculants = d.w treated- d.w control / d.w. control; Tolerance index TI % = d.w. Plant at salinity level ×100 / d.w. plant at 0.0 level of salinity; NM; Non-mycorrhizal plants and M; Mycorrhizal plants., Translocation Factors (T F) = level of element in shoot / level of element in root; LSD: At significant level (P>0.05).Sample symbols (a.a) mean non significant difference (a.b) mean significant difference.

The data recorded in Table 4 revealed that the tolerance indexes of common bean plants were significantly decreased(P>0.05) by increasing the salinity levels. The maximum reduction was obtained in non-mycorrhizal plants treated with and without TiO2NPs, while it was decreased from 38% to 24% at 200mM of salinity. On the other hand, the results also clearly show that although the tolerance indexes of common bean plants were significantly decreased by increasing the salinity levels(P>0.05), plants treated with AMF still had high salinity tolerance than untreated one at all salinity levels. It was also quite clear that the presence of TiO2NPswith AMF resulted in increasing salinity tolerance of common bean plants at all salinity levels. It reached 110% at the salinity level of 100 mM NaCl.

From the results given in Table 4, it is also obvious that TiO2NPs accumulated in higher amount in shoots than roots of plants untreated with AMF either in presence or absence of the salinity stresses. On the other hand, the TiO2NPs accumulated in roots of plants treated with AMF than untreated one that growing either in saline or normal conditions. The results also showed that the translocation factors (TF) of TiO2NPs in plants treated with AMF were much lower than those untreated under salinity stress. This may indicate that the major role of mycorrhizal symbiosis in TiO2NPs translocation within plants.

The results given in Table 5 showed that increasing the level of salinity leads to decrease in the content of phosphorus (P) in the plant and that the presence of mycorrhiza reduces the harmful effects of salinity on common bean plants; where it was found that the content of phosphorus in plants treated with mycorrhiza remains always higher than untreated one. Moreover, the results showed that plants treated with Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs, exhibited the same ratio of phosphorus at the low level of salinity and at normal conditions, which ranged from 6.2 to0.65 mg/gm. The results of Table 5 confirmed that the potassium (K) content of the plant decreased by increasing salinity level. Plants treated with AMF showed higher potassium content than untreated one either in the presence or absence of salinity. The results also showed that plants co-inoculated with AMF and TiO2NPs displayed higher content of potassium than un-inoculated plants with value19.1 mg/gm at high level of salinity. The results given in Table 5 showed that the content of the nitrogen (N) in common bean plants is significantly lower under salinity stress in the absence of AMF (P>0.05). While in the presence of AMF, N content plants inoculated with AMF was not significantly affected by the presence of salinity, especially in the presence of TiO2NPs when compared with uninoculated plants. The results also referred to that in the presence of TiO2NPs, the N content in common bean plants under salinity was closely like those under normal condition. Similar results were obtained for the protein content in common bean plants where, the protein content of plants was significantly decreased under salinity conditions (Table 3). The results revealed that the presence of AMF amended withTiO2NPs alleviate the harmful effects of salinity on protein content of common bean plants.

Table 5. Effect of salinity levels on Phosphorus (P), potassium (K), Nitrogen (N) and protein concentrations, of and mycorrhizal, non-mycorrhizal plants supplemented with and without TiO2NPs.

Periods(days) Mean of P content (mg/ g dry weight) Mean of K content (mg/g dry weight) Mean of N (mg/g dry weight plant) Mean of Protein content (mg/ g dry weight plant
Treatments
P control NM 4.8b 10.9d 5.3d 6.2c
M 6.3a 14.9c 6.6b 7.7a
TiO2NPs NM 5.2b 3.5b 5.3d 6.2c
M 6.5a 15.9a 6.9bc 8.3b
NaCl 100mM NM 0.6e 2.8f 0.8e 1.1f
M 4.6b 16.2e 5.8e 7.2b
NaCl200mM NM 0.45e 4.6f 0.7e 1.0f
M 4.1b 16.1e 5.3e 6.7b
TiO2NPs+NaCl NM 1.9c 7.7 c 5.3d 5.8d
100mM M 6.2a 18.4a 6.4a 8.9a
TiO2NPs+NaCl200mM NM 1.0d 5.4d 5.1e 6.5e
M 5.2b 19.1a 6.2c 7.9a
L.S.D(P>0.05) 0. 34 0. 54 0. 26 0. 54

NM; Non-mycorrhizal plants and M; Mycorrhizal plants. LSD: At significant level (P> 0.05). Sample symbols (a.a) mean non significant difference (a.b) mean significant difference.

The results in S1 Table showed that the plant content of sodium increased by increasing the salinity level in all treatments. Despite this increase, the total sodium content in the shoots of plants inoculated with AMF remained less than in the roots. It ranged from 12.3–18.2 in the shoots and to 28.4–59.0 in the root. The sodium content in the shoots of plants inoculated with AMF decreased in the presence of TiO2NPs. The results also showed that the Translocation Factors (T.F) of sodium decreased in plants inoculated with AMF, especially in the presence of TiO2NPs. The results confirmed the role of mycorrhiza in increasing plant tolerance for salinity, and this role is increased in the presence of TiO2NPs. The results given in S1 Table illustrated that the calcium (Ca) content in the plant decreased by increasing the level of salinity. In addition, the concentration of Ca in the roots remains higher than that of the shoots and the values of T.F. in the presence of AMF higher than in the absence of AMF. A significant finding in the results was that the T.F. recorded 60–63% in the presence of AMF and TiO2NPs either in the presence or absence of salinity. The results of S1 Table showed the irregularity of the results for salinity, but magnesium (Mg) content was higher in plants inoculated with AMF than uninoculated one. The values of T.F. were higher in the presence of AMF and TiO2NPs.

The results given in Table 6 showed that the activities of peroxidase and catalase enzymes in common bean plants increased either in the absence or the presence of saline conditions. The obtained results also revealed that activities of both enzymes were higher in plants inoculated with AMF than uninoculated one. The maximum activity recorded 0.57 and0.26 unit/mg of protein for peroxidase and catalase enzymes, respectively at 200mM salinity in plants inoculated with AMFandTiO2NPs. On the other hand, the activities of phosphates enzymes (acid and alkaline) were significantly reduced (P>0.05) by raising salinity in uninoculated plants either in the absence or the presence of TiO2NPs (Table 6). It is also obvious that the inoculation of common bean plants with the AMF resulted in stimulation of phosphatases enzymes, although the activities were slightly decreased in saline conditions. Moreover, the results also revealed that co-inoculation of common bean plants with AMF and TiO2NPscaused increases in acid and alkaline phosphatases compared with other treatments at all salinity levels.

Table 6. Effect of salinity levels on enzymes activity (Peroxidase, Catalase, acid & alkaline phosphates) of mycorrhizal, and non-mycorrhizal plants supplemented with and without TiO2NPs.

Treatments Mean of Peroxidase activity (unit/ mg protein) Mean of Catalase activity (Unit/mg protein) Mean of acid Phosphates (mg p /mg protein/min (Unit/0.1 g fresh weight) Mean of Alkaline phosphates (mg p /mg protein/min (Unit/0.1 g fresh weight)
P NM 0.10g 0.06e 12.30e 9.00f
M 0.24b 0.13c 35.40c 31.50b
TiO2NPs NM 0.11e 0.08d 12.30e 10.20e
M 0.49a 0.19a 42.00a 41.30a
NaCl 100mM NM 0.13e 0.09c 5.00g 3.70g
M 0.54b 0.21b 32.27f 30.50g
NaCl 200mM NM 0.14h 0.1f 4.55g 2.99g
M 0.54c 0.23b 28.21f 27.12g
TiO2 NPs+100mM NaCl NM 0.15f 0.11g 10.30e 10.00
M 0.56d 0.24c 38.40b 34.10c
TiO2NPs+NaCl 200mM NM 0.15f 0.13g 09.0d 10.10d
M 0.57d 0.26c 31.33d 32.50c
L.S.D(P>0.05) 0.0093 0.014 0.14 0.14

NM; Non-mycorrhizal plants and M; Mycorrhizal plants. LSD: At significant level (P> 0.05).Sample symbols (a.a) mean non significant difference (a.b) mean significant difference.

The statistical analysis of data (Table 7) confirmed significant effects of salinity (P>0.05)on dry weight, Na, K, P, Ca accumulation, protein content and catalase and peroxidase activities. The results also showed that the combined effect of AMF and TiO2NPs, AMF and salinity is similar to the combined effect of AMF, TiO2NPs and salinity. On the other hand, the results in Table 7, confirmed that TiO2NPsdoes not have significant effect on the growth of common bean plants under saline environment. The results indicated that the effect of TiO2NPs on AMF was more positive than on the plants itself under saline conditions.

Table 7. Variance (ANOVA) analysis of data for growth and physiological parameters and mycorrhiza levels of Phaseolus plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs in the presence of salinity.

Treatments M M & S N M&N N & S S M&N&S
Dry weight ** ** ns ** * ** *
Sodium * ** ns ** Ns ** **
Calcium * * ns * * * **
Magnesium * * * * ns n *
Potassium * * ns * ns * *
Phosphorus ** * * * ns * **
Nitrogen * * * * * ns **
Protein content ^ * * ** * * **
Acid Phosphatases ** * ns ** ns ns *
Alkaline Phosphatases ** * ns ** ns ns *
Catalase ns ns * * * * *
Peroxidase ** * ns ns ns * *

M = mycorrhiza N = TiO2NPs S = salinity

**Highly significant, P ≤0.01

* significant, P ≤ 0.01 ns = Non-significant.

PCR amplification of the nest primer region using DNA extracted from AMF colonizing roots with various treatments recorded at 550bp (Fig 4). In addition, PCR amplification of the Chitin synthase primer region using DNA extracted from AMF colonizing roots with various treatments recorded at 580bp (Fig 5).The gene expression (molecular ratios intensity) analysis (S2 Table) for amplified nest and Chitin syntheses genes showed that AMF genes in the presence of TiO2NPs had the most significant intensity and quantity compared to AMF genes in the absence of TiO2NPs. On the hand, the intensity of AMF gene decreased significantly (P>0.05) under salinity stress. While the amendment of AMF with TiO2NPs to significantly increased AMF genes intensity compared to AMF under salinity stress without TiO2NPs. Thus, statistical molecular ratio analysis revealed that intensity of AMF genes was higher with TiO2NPs. By this way, Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Relative Density (AMRD) was calculated for each treatment in roots of common bean plants. The analysis of variance (S2 Table) indicated that TiO2NPs had a significant role on the relative density of mycorrhizal species in roots. Funneliformis mosseae nest and ChS relative density increased in roots when inoculated with TiO2NPs (Figs 6 and 7). Also, TiO2NPs increased the relative density of AMF under salinity stress compared to AMF under salinity stress without TiO2NPs.The analysis indicated that relative density of nest genes of AMF increased 30%after inoculation with TiO2NPs. The analysis of variance indicated that the AMF nest genes with TiO2NPs had a significant effect on the relative density of AMF in roots compared with single inoculants of AMF under the presence or the absence of salinity stress about 30% and 40%, respectively (Fig 6). In addition, the presence of TiO2NPs increased the relative density of the chitin synthase gene of AMF under salinity stress compared to single inoculants of AMF about (50%), (Fig 7). Thus, TiO2NPs play a major role in the significant increase of AMF activity, intensity and relative density.

Fig 4. PCR amplification of the nest primer region using DNA extracted from AMF colonizing roots with various treatments.

Fig 4

(M) DNA Marker; Lane (1) control (uninoculated with AMF), Lane (2)control (inoculated with AMF); Lane (3), AMF + TiO2NPs; Lane (4), AMF+ NaCl100mM; Lane (5), AMF+NaCl100mM+TiO2NPs; Lane (6) AMF+ NaCl 200mM; Lane (7) AMF+ NaCl200mM+TiO2NPs.

Fig 5. PCR amplification of the Chitin synthase primer region using DNA extracted from AMF colonizing roots with various treatments.

Fig 5

(M) DNA Marker; Lane (1) control (uninoculated with AMF), Lane (2) control (inoculated with AMF); Lane (3), AMF + TiO2NPs; Lane (4), AMF+ NaCl100mM; Lane (5), AMF+NaCl100mM+TiO2NPs; Lane (6) AMF+ NaCl 200mMl; Lane (7) AMF+ NaCl 200mM+TiO2NPs.

Fig 6. Molecular relative density of nest gene intensity and quantity fold under different treatments: Single AMF, paired inoculation of AMF with TiO2NPs, AMF under different salinity stress and AMF with TiO2NPs under different salinity stress.

Fig 6

Fig 7. Molecular relative density of gene intensity and quantity fold under different treatments: Single AMF, paired inoculation of AMF with TiO2NPs, AMF under different salinity stress and AMF with TiO2NPs under different salinity stress.

Fig 7

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on measured parameters of common bean plants under salinity stress in response to treatments with AMF and TiO2NPs (Fig 8A and 8B). Interpretation of the principal components (PCs) was aided by inspection of the factor-loading matrix extracted from a Varimax rotation with Kaiser Normalization of main components to identify factors responsible for the grouping of the dataset. As shown from scree plot graph of eigenvalues and loadings plot (Fig 8A and 8B), the first three components; F %, M % and A % have higher eigenvalues than other measured components. Therefore, the two components were extracted describing approximately 88.81%. Accordingly, principal component analysis gave evidence to the importance of parameters i.e. M (%) and A (%), especially F (%), as it was considered a good and more reliable indicator for development of AMF in the presence and absence of TiO2NPs under salinity stress.

Fig 8.

Fig 8

The scree plot of eigenvalue (A) and loadings plot (B) for the component number of the measured parameters for common bean plants under salinity stress in response to treatments with AMFandTiO2NPs: A:F% Frequency of mycorrhizal root segments, B:M% intensity of mycorrhizal colonization, C:A% arbuscule frequency in root systems, D:(MD) mycorrhizal dependency, E:Dry Wt. (g), F:Efficiency of inoculants, G:Tolerance index %, H:Tio2NPs concentration in root, I:Tio2NPs concentration in shoot, J:(T.F) Translocation Factors, K:(P) content, L:(K) content, M:(N) content, N:Protein content, O:Peroxidase activity, P:Catalase activity, Q:Acid Phosphates and R: Alkaline phosphates.

Discussion

Mycorrhizal symbiosis is an opener compound in assisting plants to overcome counteractive environmental situations. In this study, the overall growth and physiological parameters of common bean plants grown under two levels of salinity increased upon association with AMF. The results also indicated that application of TiO2NPs can improve the growth of inoculated and uninoculated plants with AMF at the two levels of salinity but in lesser extent in uninoculated plants. These findings suggested that application of AMF combined with TiO2NPs may help in overcoming the detrimental growth effects of salt stress induced by sequential irrigation with salt solutions at100 and200 mM NaCl. As expected and documented in the literature, AMF has been demonstrated to induce salinity tolerance in various plant species [48,49].

In the present study, mycorrhizal colonization of common bean roots were significantly reduced under salinity levels but plants inoculated with AMFandTiO2NPs still had higher mycorrhizal colonization. In contrast, [50] it was demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of TiO2NPs on arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in roots of rice plant at medium to higher levels of application (> 2%). Notably, it was observed that TiO2 NPs had a negative effect on the abundance of some prokaryotic and increased the abundance of other prokaryotic and some fungal organisms. Some of these fungal organisms belonged to the phylum Ascomycota [51]. However, concerns have been raised that some nanoparticles may negatively affect crops, soil microbial communities and their effects on the diversity and community composition of soil microorganisms including beneficial microbes such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and this depends on the concentration of TiO2NPs that used [27]. Overall, it was proved that prokaryotes are more sensitive than fungi to the TiO2NPs treatments, also No negative effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization were detected, and no evidence for a dose-response relationship between wheat performance and TiO2NPs concentration was found [27].Previous literature suggested that high concentrations of silver nanoparticles can deteriorate the mutual interaction between plants and AM fungi and negatively influence the rhizospherics oil P cycling, both of which go against plant growth and soil fertility. The effects of silver nanoparticles on plants and soil microbial communities have been widely documented [52,53].

One of the most interesting results in Table 3, is the values of mycorrhiza development at the end of the experiment (90 days) was higher than that at 45 days in the presence of TiO2NPs under salinity conditions. In this connection [54], it was found that the inhibitory effect of TiO2NPs on AMF colonization in plant roots was more pronounced during early stages of its application and found to recover during the late stages of application. For this reason, it could be explained that AMF activities were not affected by the inhibitory effect of TiO2NPs at the end of the experiment. One explanation based on the high mobility of TiO2NPs through the porous substratum i.e. soil. Another one is the production of more mycorrhizal roots in the absence of a high concentration of TiO2NPs for a higher scoring of mycorrhizal variables at late stages of application. The amazing results in this study, which supported our previous results, is activity of mycorrhizal measurements (F%, % M, % A) which were increased in the presence of TiO2NPs, especially for arbuscule activity (% A) which was three times that of the absence of TiO2NPs. Since arbuscule meant for the transference of nutrients between fungus and the plant, the increasing activities of this structure are likely to affect the functional symbiosis within the host roots leading to increase in growth and tolerance of the plant to salinity. Evidence from our data, indicates that mycorrhizal dependencies for plant dry mass increased by raising salinity. The increase varied from 369% to 465% in the absence and presence of TiO2NPs, respectively at lower salinity level. While at higher salinity level, dry mass was increased from 358% to 883% in the absence and presence of TiO2NPs, respectively. The beneficial effects of mycorrhiza on the growth under saline conditions have been studied in various plants [55,56].

In the present investigation the tolerance index common bean plants inoculated with AMF was higher than that uninoculated one at all levels of salinity. The tolerance index of salinity in plants inoculated with AMF increased in the presence of TiO2NPs. Tolerance index of salinity in plants inoculated with AMF and TiO2NPs were nearly 2.0 and 3.0 fold higher than that of uninoculated plants, respectively at the two salinity levels. In addition, one of the interesting findings in this study was that the rate of improvement of plants growth under saline conditions in the presence of AMF and TiO2NPs was better than in AMF only. While, TiO2NPs alone does not have a significant effect on plant growth in this conditions. The improvement in the growth of common bean plants inoculated with AMF in the saline environment was due to the influence of TiO2NPs on the efficacy of AMF and not on the plant itself.

Nutrient imbalances in plants may create from the effect of salinity on nutrient availability, competitive uptake, transport or partitioning within the plant, or may be caused by physiological inactivation of a given nutrient. In the present work, the ions deficiency displayed by salinity stress, particularly by NaCl uptake indicated a nutritional imbalance. It has been generally accepted that Am fungi would elevate nutrient uptake by infected plants under salinity conditions [57]. In the results obtained herein, it is interesting to note that common bean plants inoculated with AMF contained significant levels N, P and K, particularly in the presence of TiO2NPs. Based on these results and available literature, the greater salt tolerance of common bean plants inoculated with AMF may be the result of the plant nutrition improvement under salinity stress. Previous researches have emphasized the potency of AMF in minimizing the negative influences of salinity on various plants [58].

Surprisingly, while mycorrhizal plants in the present study gathered more Na+ in their roots with raising salinity, shoots of these plants had lower Na+ content and exhibited limited collection with increasing salinity particularly in the presence of TiO2NPs, and in absence and presence of salinity. These results are consistent with the previous work [59] and proposed that AMF may conserve the shoot system particularly leaves from Na+ toxicity either by accumulating it in root thereby dilatory its translocation onto shoot system of infected plants or by adjusting Na+ uptake from the soil. On the other hand, the results obtained herein demonstrated that K+/Na+ ratio was higher in plants inoculated with AMF, particularly in presence of TiO2NPs, under salinity levels. In this context, the higher ratios of K+/Na+ was proved to be one of the key determinants of plant salt tolerance [60].

The results of this study specified that AMF symbiosis created by a salt-tolerant fungus can significantly raise the dry weight, P, K, N, protein content, Mg, catalase, peroxidase, acid and alkaline phosphatases activities of common bean plants under saline stress conditions particularly in the presence of TiO2NPs.These results proved that the incipient role of AMF in increasing salinity tolerance of common bean plants up to 200 mM of NaCl. In addition, the results demonstrated that monitoring of ion uptake by roots and transport into leaves and compartmentalization of ions at the cellular and whole plant levels are the ultimate efficient action of AMF for acclimation of common bean plants to salinity stress [61,62]. These delineations have been enhanced efficiently by co-inoculating AMF with TiO2NPs. However, little information is currently available about potentiality of TiO2NPs as co-activator to AMF under stress. Studies on AMF andTiO2NPsinteractions are still in their infancy; more research is needed to better understanding of the interactions between AMF and nanoparticle materials for the development of sustainable management of soil salinity and other stresses.

The previous research about TiO2NPs potency to be applied as a “stress-ameliorative” or “chemical-priming” agent in plants or in the rhizosphere were little and scattered. It was shown that the growth intensifying influences of low-concentration of TiO2NPs as well as its ameliorative potential in dealing with soil salinity [63]. The influences related to TiO2NPs ability to boost photosynthesis and antioxidant defense, which help plants intensify their growth. A recent [64] demonstrated that the ameliorative effects of TiO2NPs, against cold stress on chickpea plants had been related to the possible responsive components that were involved in signal transduction, defense, metabolism and regulatory processes. Apparently, these components supply positive support in enhancing the tolerance of chickpea to cold stress. In consistency with these results, our results reveal that Phosphorus, nitrogen, protein, magnesium and catalase were significantly increased in common bean plants in the presence of TiO2NPs under salinity stress. In this connection, [65] it was proved that the presence of TiO2NPs could also ameliorate plant nitrogen status. Furthermore, it was found that application ofTiO2NPs boosted the enzymatic antioxidant defense, which helped plants realize better conduct of raised ROS levels output under salinity [17].

Apart from the results of salinity stress, careful examination of our results revealed that plant inoculated with AMF showed higher significant increases in all parameters measured in the presence of TiO2NPs, while the presence of TiO2NPs alone in common bean plants did not exhibit significant effect in most measurement. From the results obtained herein, the plant growth response was assessed by whole plant biomass and nutrient analysis, while AMF activity responses were determined using DNA-based methods or biomass measurements as needed. The initial application of the PCR technique has been very successful [42]. In this study, DNA extraction and the PCR amplification from roots showed an expected fragment size for the nest and ChS primers. So, we concluded that AMF is capable of colonizing common bean roots [66,67]. From the results obtained, the molecular ratio and relative density were two folds in AMF with TiO2NPs compared with the single inoculation of AMF or under the presence of salinity stress in roots [11]. In this connection, the results of this study showed that the different treatments of paired inoculation with AMF could have different effects on AMF colonization. Whereas, the relative density and the intensity of gene expression in AMF in the presence of TiO2NPs were higher than AMF alone or in the presence of salinity stress [68]. So, TiO2NPs have a stimulatory effect on the establishment of the AMF symbiosis [69,70].Thus, the intensity detection of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in this study made by a reaction of the molecule that reports an increase in the amount of DNA with a proportional increase in intensity [40].Where specific primers were applied to quantify mycorrhizal abundance and activity in the plant roots affected by TiO2NPs in the presence and absence of salinity treatments employing quantitative PCR.

Conclusions

In the current study, the inoculation of AMF along withTiO2NPs showed to be highly effective in improving salinity tolerance compared to single inoculation with AMF alone. In addition, the presented study revealed that PCR method considered as a quantitative detection system for evaluation the occupancy and the activity by symbiotic and mutalistic relationship between AMF and common bean plants. Accordingly, it is of interest to suggest that the positive effect of TiO2NPs was confined to its effect on AMF not on common bean plant itself. Therefore, a better understanding of the interactions between TiO2NPs and AMF activities within plants responses, including their uptake transport, internalization, and activity, could revolutionize crop production through increased disease resistance, nutrient utilization, and crop yield.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Effect of salinity levels on sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and translocation.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Amplified Nest and chitin synthase quantity (intensity & relative density) of mycorrhiza levels of Phaseolus plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs in the presence of salinity.

(DOCX)

S1 File. Brief methodologies protocol.

Brief methodologies protocol for some measurements.

(PDF)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express them heartfelt thanks to both Prof. Dr. Gamal Enan, Professor of Microbiology, Dean of Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Egypt and Prof.Dr. Gamal Rabie, Professor of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Egypt for their guides, instructions and revising assistance in this work. We are also indebted to King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for facilities.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research College of Science Research Center and Zagazig University, Egypt, Faculty of Science. We are also indebted to Zagazig University, Egypt for facilities. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cabello JV, Lodeyro AF, Zurbriggen MD. Novel perspectives for the engineering of a biotic stress tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2014;26: 62–70. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Julkowska MM, Testerink C. Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends in Plant Science.2015;20: 586–594. 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mohamed AA, Eichler-Lobermann B, Schnug E. Response of crops to salinity under Egyptian conditions: A review. LandbauforschungVolkenrode 2007;57(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ashraf M Harris PJC. Potential Biochemical Indicators of Salinity Tolerance in Plants Plant Science.2004; 166:3–16 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parniske M, 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 763–775. 10.1038/nrmicro1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Del-Saz N F, Romero-Munar A, Alonso-Forn D, Aroca R, Baraza E, Flexas J,. Respiratory ATP cost and benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis with Nicotiana tabacum at different growth stages and under salinity Journal of Plant Physiology 2017; 218 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romero-Munar A, Baraza E, Gulías J, Cabot C. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Confer Salt Tolerance in Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) Plants Grown Under Low Phosphorus by Reducing Leaf Na+ Concentration and Improving Phosphorus Use Efficiency Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 843 10.3389/fpls.2019.00843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verma S K, Das A K, Patel M K, Shah A, Kumar V, Gantait S. Engineered nanomaterials for plant growth and development: A perspective analysis Science of the Total Environment 2018; 630:1413–1435. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Servin AD, Castillo-Michel H, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Diaz BC, Peralta-Videa JR. Gardea-Torresdey JL. ynchrotron micro-XRF and micro-XANES confirmation of the uptake and translocation of TiO2 nanoparticles in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012; 46:7637–7643. 10.1021/es300955b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mishra V, Mishra R, Dikshit A, Pandey A. Interactions of nanoparticles with plants: an emerging prospective in the agriculture industry. Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance. Biol. Tech. 2014; 1:159–180. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800876-8.00008-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang X, Li W, Yang Z. Toxicology of nanosized titanium dioxide: an update. Archives of Toxicology. 2015; 89: 2207–2217. 10.1007/s00204-015-1594-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jonathan DJ, Jason KK, Courtney C, Mike M, Cathy F, Claire W, et al. Effects of silver sulfide nanomaterials on mycorrhizal colonization of tomato plants and soil microbial communities in biosolid-amended soil. Environmental Pollution 2015; 206: 256–263 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fan R, Chu Huang Y, Grusak M A, Huang CP. Sherrier D J. Effects of nano-TiO2 on the agronomically-relevant Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Science of The Total Environment.2013; 466-467C:503–512 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feng Y, Cui X, He S, Dong G, Chen M, Wang J, et al. The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47:9496–9504 10.1021/es402109n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marta AT, Jacek O, Marcin S, Alexander U. Do silver nanoparticles stimulate the formation of ectomycorrhizae in seedlings of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.)? Symbiosis 2019; 79:89–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cao J, Fenga Y, Hed S, Lina X. Silver nanoparticles deteriorate the mutual interaction between maize (Zea mays L.) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a soil microcosm study. Applied Soil Ecology. 2017;119: 307–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress toleranceROS are good. Trends in Plant Science.2017;22: 11–19. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schlaeppi K, Bender SF, Mascher F, Russo G, Patrignani A, Andrea R, et al. High‐resolution community profiling of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 2016; 212: 780–791. 10.1111/nph.14070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rabie G H. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus to red kidney and wheat plants tolerance grown in heavy metal-polluted soil African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005. a; 4 (4); 332–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gerdemann J, Nicolson TH. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1963; 46: 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ml Jackson. “Soil chemical analysis”. New Delhi; Prentice Hall, India; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jackson ML. “Soil chemical Analysis”. Prentice-Hall International; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boby VU, Balakrishna AN, Bagyaraj DJ. Interaction between Glomus mosseae and soil yeasts on growth and nutrition of cowpea. Microbiological Research.2008;163:693–700. 10.1016/j.micres.2006.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.El-Gazzar NS. Continuous production of nanometal by some fungi isolated from heavy metal polluted habitats. PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt, 2015.
  • 25.Rabie GH, Zein E A, Bakry A A. Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using filamentous fungi. Nano Science and Nano Technology. 2013;7(5): 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Osman A, El-Didamony G, Sitohy M, Khalifa M, Enan G. Soybean glycinin basic subunit inhibits methicillin resistant-vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-VISA) in vitro. International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products, 2016;9(2):17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moll J, Klingenfuss F, Widmer F, Gogos A, Bucheli T D, Hartmann M, et al. Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on soil microbial communities and wheat biomass 1Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2017; 111:85–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singha J, Lee B. Effects of Nano-TiO2particles on bioaccumulation of133Cs from the contaminated soil by Soybean (Glycine max) Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2018; 116:301–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.El-Gazzar NS, Enan G. Advances in phage inspired nanoscience based therapy. Nanobioscience,. Saxena S.K., Khurana S. P. Springer Nature Singapore PteLtd; 2020; Chapter 10.pp.237–257 eds. 10.1007/978-981-32-9898-9_8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S. Enzymatic studies on the metabolism of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. I. Effect of mycorrhiza formation and phosphorus nutrition on soluble phosphatase activities in onion roots. Physiologie Vegetale. 1976;14: 833–841. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Phillips JM, Hayman DA. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970; 55:158–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Giovannetti M, Mosse B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New phytol. 1980; 84: 489–500. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gerdemann J. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. In: Torrey J.G., Clarkson D. T. (Eds.), The Development and Function of Roots Academic Press,1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weimberg B A. Effect of growth in highly salinized media on the enzymes of the photosynthesis apparatus in pea seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1975; 56:8–12. 10.1104/pp.56.1.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annual Review of Biochemistry.1976;72:248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abdel Shafi S, Al-Mohammadi AR., Osman A, Enan G, Abdel Hameid S, Sitohy M. Characterization and antibacterial activity of 7S and 11S globulins isolated from cowpea seed protein. Molecules., 2019;24:1082; 3390/molecules24061082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Murphy J, Riley J H. Amodified single solution methods for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1962; 27: 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nation JL, Robinson F A. Concentration of some major and trace elements in honeybee, royal jelly and pollen determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Journal of Apicultural Research.1971;10: 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nelson D W, Sommers LE. Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agronomy Journal. 1973;65: 109–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. A plant DNA mini preparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1983; 1(14):19–2144. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Salam H A, El-Khamisssy T, Enan GA, Hollenberg CP. Expression of mouse anticreatine kinase (MAK33) monoclonal antibody in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001; 56:157–164. 10.1007/s002530000572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alkan N, Gadkar V, Yarden O, Kapulnik Y. Analysis of quantitative interaction between two species of arbuscular fungi, Glomus mosseae and G. intraradices, by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(6):4192–4199. 10.1128/AEM.02889-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Simon L, Le´vesque R C, Lalonde M. Rapid quantitation by PCR of endomycorrhizal fungi colonizing roots. PCR Methods Applic. 1992; 2:76–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bowen AR, Chen-Wu JL, Momany M, Young R, Szaniszlo PJ, Robbins PW. Classification of fungal chitin synthases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.1992;89: 519–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Enan G, Osman ME, Abdel–Haliem M E F, Abdel-Ghany S. Advances in microbial and nucleic acids biotechnology. Biomed Research International.2018;1–2. 10.1155/2018/3102374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Steel R G D, Torri J H. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill; New York, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hicks CR. Fundamental concepts in the design of experimental. CBS College Publishing; New York, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ge Y, Schimel J P, Holden PA. Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2012; 78: 6749–6758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burke DJ, Zhu S, Pablico-Lansigan MP, Hewins CR, Samia ACS. Titanium oxide nanoparticle effects on composition of soil microbial communities and plant performance. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2014;50: 1169–1173. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Priyanka SV, Parakkandi K, Harikumar M K, Balakrishna TV. Inhibitory effect of TiO2 NPs on symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant roots. IET Nanobiotechnology.2016;1–6. www.ietdl.org. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2014.0066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Van der Heijden M, Hartmann M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLoS Biology 2016; 14: e1002378 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sweet MJ, Singleton I. Soil contamination with silver nanoparticles reduces Bishop pine growth and ectomycorrhizal diversity on pine roots. J Nanopart Res 2015; 17:448 10.1007/s11051-015-3246-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Olchowik J, Bzdyk R, Studnicki M, Bederska-Błaszczyk M, Urban A, Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska M. The effects of silver and copper nanoparticles on the condition of English oak (Quercus robur L.) seedlings in a container nursery experiment. Forests 2017; 8:310 10.3390/f8090310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Feng Y, Cui X, He S, Dong G, Chen M, Wang J. The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47;9496–9504. 10.1021/es402109n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rabie G H, Aboul-Nasr MB, Al-Humiany A. Increased Salinity Tolerance of Cowpea Plants by Dual Inoculation of an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Glomus clarum and a Nitrogen-fixer Azospirillum brasilense. Mycobiology. 2005. b; 33(1): 51–60. 10.4489/MYCO.2005.33.1.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abd_Allah ES, Hashem A, Alqarawi AA, Bahkali AH, Alwhibi AS. Enhancing growth performance and systemic acquired resistance of medicinal plant Sesbaniasesban (L.) Merr using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Saudi J. Bio. Sci.2015;22: 274–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kumar A, Sharma S, Mishra S. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and salinity on seedling growth, solute accumulation and mycorrhizal dependency of Jatropha curcas L. Plant Growth Reg. 2010;29: 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee Y, Krishnamoorthy R, Selvakumar G, Kim K, Sa T. Alleviation of salt stress in maize plant by co-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Methylo bacteriumoryzae CBMB20. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem.2015, 58:533–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bothe H. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and salt tolerance of plants. Symbiosis. 2012; 58:7–16 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Giri B, Kapoor R, Mukerji KG. Improved tolerance of Acacia nilotica to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza, Glomus fasciculatum, may be partly related to elevated Kþ/Naþ ratios in root and shoot tissues. Microbial Ecology. 2007; 54: 753–760. 10.1007/s00248-007-9239-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tan WJ, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Interaction of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with soil components and plants: current knowledge and future research needs—a critical review. Environ Sci Nano. 2018; 5(2): 257–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kadian N, Yadav K, Badda N, Aggarwal A. Application of arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi in improving growth and nutrient of ymopsistetragonoloba (L.) Taub under saline soil. Intl. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 2013; 4: 2796–2805. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Abdel Latef A, Ashish K S, Mahmmoud S A, Mojtaba K, Lam-Son P T. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles improve growth and enhance tolerance of broad bean plants under saline soil conditions. Land Degradation and Development. 2017; 3: 1915–1946. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Amini S, Maali-Amiri R, Mohammadi R, Kazemi-Shahandashti SS. cDNA-AFLP analysis of transcripts induced in chickpea plants by TiO2 nanoparticles during cold stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017; 111:39–49. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yuan S J, Chen JJ, Lin ZQ, Li WW, Sheng GP, Yu HQ. Nitrate formation from atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen photocatalysed by nano-sized titanium dioxide. Nature Communications.2013;4: 2249 10.1038/ncomms3249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Baird LM, Caruso KJ. Development of root nodules in Phaseolus vulgaris inoculated with Rhizobium and mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Plant Sci.1994; 155:633–639. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Scheublin TR, van der Heijden M.G.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonize non fixing root nodules of several legume species. New Phytol. 2006; 172:732–738. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01858.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xie ZP, Staehelin C, Vierheilig H, Wiemken A, Jabbouri S, Broughton WJ, et al. Rhizobial nodulation factors stimulate mycorrhizal colonization of nodulating and nonnodulating soybeans. Plant Physiol. 1995; 108:1519–1525. 10.1104/pp.108.4.1519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Long SR. Genes and signals in the rhizobium—legume symbiosis. Plant Physiol.2001; 125:69–72. 10.1104/pp.125.1.69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Oldroyd GED, Harrison MJ, Udvardi M. Peace talks and trade deal. Keys to long-term harmony in legume-microbe symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2005; 137:1205–1210. 10.1104/pp.104.057661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ying Ma

4 May 2020

PONE-D-19-32967

Influence of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants under salinity stress

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. El-Gazzar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please revise your manuscript according to the comments from both Reviewers below.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 18 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ying Ma, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1.    Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.  We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear editor,

I would like to thank the opportunity to revise this paper. This paper has an interesting overall goal to understand the influence of nanotechnology on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (amf) that in turn influence Phaseolus vulgaris plants. It is a nice paper and should be accepted for publication in PLOS ONE. I have some consideration, comments and corrections (I follow lines in pdf MS, line 1. Title of article)

To change the title by e.g., “Influence of Funneliformis mosseae enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles on Phaseolus vulgaris L under salinity stress”, since nowadays Glomus mosseae is classified as Funneliformis mosseae and it also can increase the interest of the potential readers;

Delete abbreviation of short expression, use full words. Abbreviations typically decrease the number of readers because is interdisciplinary;

Some keywords do not reflect the content of the manuscript. I suggest using the following keywords:

Glomeromycota instead Microbiology and Mycology;

Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae

Common bean roots instead Plant science

Activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi instead life science and environmental sciences

Nanotechnology

Salinity stress

In the introduction, please make it more clearly what is the novelty (scientific/technical) of your work, approach, and results compared to already well-known facts. Most facts and trends given in the text of this article are much too vague. All trends, facts, and results must be supported by precise terms and data/numbers;

Please, to provide clear hypotheses based in more than two scientific statements;

L53-54 I can’t see the linkage to the above paragraphs;

L66 Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae;

L69 The description of the “source of mycorrhiza, pot and potting mixture” section is not clear. I suggest it be made clearer to facilitate the evaluation of the MS;

L82 Use “chemical analysis” instead “biochemical analysis;

L83 soil pH?

L85-86 The pots and soil were sterilized?

L107 How many blocks?

L108-113 The description of the treatments is not clear. I suggest to use a table to facilitate the reader to see the differences among the studied treatments;

L108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae;

L118 To many dissimilar variables into the same subsection. I suggest split it in four subsections: 1) AMF (e.g., Colonization and mycorrhizal dependency); 2) Plant biomass and protein; 3) A&A P activity; and 4) Plant macronutrient contents. Also, the authors must describe all methods clearer;

L21, 118 Use the word “biomass” instead “mass” or even “matter” to describe plant/shoot/root dry biomass;

L133 Since AMF are classified into the Phylum Glomeromycota, I suggest using only the word “spores” instead “Chlamydospores”;

L191 I expected to see a principal component analysis or even a non-metric multidimensional scaling to describe the similarities/dissimilarities among the treatments considering all matrix;

The presentation of the results can be improved using multivariate analysis.

To many tables. I suggest presenting only significative results. The results without significative differences must be added as an electronic supplementary material;

The discussion needs to be improved by explaining further the results and the mechanisms underlying salinity, the use of nanoparticles and the growth of inoculated plants with AMF;

Reviewer #2: The use of nanotechnology for improving the soil-plant relationship is an emerging area of research with wide academic and industrial scope. This paper tried to investigate the role of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in improving the AMF assisted and plant-soil interactions. The work seems to be carried out with care and the findings reported by the authors have importance in improving the crop productivity in saline soils. Before its publication, authors are required to improve the manuscript by following suggestions. I recommend moderate revision to the manuscript.

1. The title should be revised by adding “(TiO2NPs)” particularly after titanium dioxide.

2. Line 21: Add “, respectively” after salinity level.

3. The introduction is nicely written and the problem is discussed well.

4. The authors should add some reports based on the use of NPs for enhancing the soil-plant interactions to strengthen the proposed hypothesis in the introduction section.

5. Line 61: Thus, ....., the line should be started from a new paragraph. It will bring clarity between the novelty and objectives of the study.

6. Line 74: Describe why the authors selected the particular local strain of mycorrhiza with its industrial possibilities.

7. Line 75: The authors should provide a brief methodology for this section. The data may be provided as supporting information files to avoid text plagiarism, if.

8. Line 80: Provide geocoordinates of Sharkia province.

9. Most of the methodologies are just mentioned in short sentences which are not recommended. Provide brief protocols for them.

10. Line 85: Why you have used an abbreviated form of Dept. Agric. Res. Centre, Giza, Egypt?

11. Line 92: add space between TiO2NPswere.

12. Line 98: Direct use of numerical value in the starting of paragraph and sentence? Why?

13. Check for potential typing errors “breaks, spaces, dots, etc., throughout the manuscript.

14. Line 191: Provide names of software used in this study.

15. Line 197: Better to provide the information of the FTIR spectrum (9 peaks) as a single table data.

16. Some asterisks given in the table data are not defined in their footer captions.

17. Use uniform font and text formatting in the manuscript.

18. The level of statistical significance should be provided in the manuscript wherever it is mentioned.

19. Have you observed some negative effects of low NP treatment and high salt concentration? Describe in discussion section accordingly with supportive literature.

20. Many references are outdated. Authors are required to replace them with the latest one including https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101463.

21. Figs. resolution is too low and difficult to understand.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Tancredo Souza

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0235355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235355.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Jun 2020

All the remarks of the reviewers are considered and corrections were given and marked by yellow colour. We declare that we have not ethical or legal restrictions for showing our data. We also do not have some things to keep in repositories and no accession numbers for organisms in Gene Bank are provided. All the original uncropped and unadjusted blot/ gel images reported in S1 raw images pdf file.

1-The revised manuscript followed the PLOS ONE style requirements and the required files followed the naming provided in your last message as Instructions for authors of PLOS ONE.

2- We certify that PLOS ONE only allows data to be available upon request. We also have not ethical restrictions on sharing our data for publicity in media or something else.

I will be very happy if this revised manuscript could be published in PLOS ONE as an original contribution

Responses to reviewers

I would like to thank the reviewers

Reviewer 1

To change the title by e.g., “Influence of Funneliformis mosseae enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles on Phaseolus vulgaris L under salinity stress”, since nowadays Glomus mosseae is classified as Funneliformis mosseae and it also can increase the interest of the potential readers;

I thank the reviewer by providing us with the recent update about the taxonomic issues of mycorrhiza. The correct and the name given by the reviewer is provided in the text.

Delete abbreviation of short expression, use full words. Abbreviations typically decrease the number of readers because is interdisciplinary;

We followed the instruction for authors as can as possible. The acronyms are deleted with exception of some mandatory one.

Some keywords do not reflect the content of the manuscript. I suggest using the following keywords:

Glomeromycota instead Microbiology and Mycology;

Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae

Common bean roots instead Plant science

Activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi instead life science and environmental sciences

Nanotechnology

Salinity stress

The keywords suggested are given and really are more understanding.

In the introduction, please make it more clearly what is the novelty (scientific/technical) of your work, approach, and results compared to already well-known facts. Most facts and trends given in the text of this article are much too vague. All trends, facts, and results must be supported by precise terms and data/numbers;

This point is very important and we thank the reviewer. The introduction was written again taking in account the last published perspectives in this field and the reviewer’s comments become more understanding.

Please, to provide clear hypotheses based in more than two scientific statements;

L53-54 I can’t see the linkage to the above paragraphs;

Introduction now is a bulk unit containing a sequence of thoughts and shows the need to do such work.

L66 Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae;

It was changed within the whole manuscript

L69 The description of the “source of mycorrhiza, pot and potting mixture” section is not clear. I suggest it be made clearer to facilitate the evaluation of the MS;

The providing of the stock soil containing AFM was showed as it was part of our previous work. The stimulation of AFM growth and preparation of inocula are given in the text.

L82 Use “chemical analysis” instead “biochemical analysis;

This note is considered and corrected in the text

L83.soilpH?

pH at (7.9) and present within the manuscript

L85-86 The pots and soil were sterilized?

The soil was sterilized by autoclave and its details are given in the text. The pots were sterilized by their keeping in UV chamber for 12 h

L107 How many blocks?

6 replicates were allowed for each treatment. About 12 treatments as given in Table (1) were carried out

L108-113 The description of the treatments is not clear. I suggest to use a table to facilitate the reader to see the differences among the studied treatments;

I thank the reviewer for such comment. Treatments are given in Table (1). 6 replicates from each treatment were carried out.

L108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 Funneliformis mosseae instead Glomus mosseae;

It was corrected in the whole manuscript.

L118 To many dissimilar variables into the same subsection. I suggest split it in four subsections: 1) AMF (e.g., Colonization and mycorrhizal dependency); 2) Plant biomass and protein; 3) A&A P activity; and 4) Plant macronutrient contents. Also, the authors must describe all methods clearer;

This is good comment and subsections were made according to the reviewer comment and such brain storm really improved the manuscript.

L21, 118 Use the word “biomass” instead “mass” or even “matter” to describe plant/shoot/root dry biomass;

It was changed in the manuscript

L133 Since AMF are classified into the Phylum Glomeromycota, I suggest using only the word “spores” instead “Chlamydospores”;

This is corrected in the whole manuscript and pointed by yellow colour

L191 I expected to see a principal component analysis or even a non-metric multidimensional scaling to describe the similarities/dissimilarities among the treatments considering all matrix;

I thank the reviewer for such comment. The principal component analysis and a non-metric multidimensional scaling already made among the treatments considering all matrix with total Variance and Component Matrixa and inserted as (Figure 8 a, b) in Figure file also explained in result section (last paragraph) by yellow colour. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on measured parameters of common bean plants under salinity stress in response to treatments with AMF and TiO2NPs (Fig. 8A and B). Interpretation of the principal components (PCs) was aided by inspection of the factor-loading matrix extracted from a Varimax rotation with Kaiser Normalization of main components to identify factors responsible for the grouping of the dataset. As shown from scree plot graph of eigenvalues and loadings plot (Fig. 8A and B), the first three components; F %, M % and A % have higher eigenvalues than other measured components. Therefore, the two components were extracted describing approximately 88.81%. Accordingly, principal component analysis gave evidence to the importance of parameters i.e.M (%) and A (%), especially F (%), as it was considered a good and more reliable indicator for development of AMF in the presence and absence of TiO2NPs under salinity stress.

The presentation of the results can be improved using multivariate analysis.

Variance ANOVA analysis was done and showed the variance and significance or not. Results were taken as means and there are showed as a, b, c, d in tables; each with certain weight; LSD: At significant level (P> 0.05).Sample symbols (a.a) mean non significant difference (a.b) mean significant difference

To many tables. I suggest presenting only significance results. The results without significance differences must be added as an electronic supplementary material;

Both Table 4 and 7 as labeled in un revised manuscript , that without mandatory significance were changed to supplementary material Supplementary Table 1. Effect of salinity levels on sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and translocation.

Supplementary Table 2 . Amplified Nest and chitin synthase Quantity (Intensity & Relative density) of mycorrhiza levels of Phaseolus plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs in the presence of salinity.

The discussion needs to be improved by explaining further the results and the mechanisms underlying salinity, the use of nanoparticles and the growth of inoculated plants with AMF;

These concepts and explanations are given in the text.

Reviewer #2:

1. The title should be revised by adding “(TiO2NPs)” particularly after titanium dioxide.

It is done and mentioned in the title

2. Line 21: Add “, respectively” after salinity level.

It is done and mentioned in the title

3. The introduction is nicely written and the problem is discussed well.

Thank you very much for this point. Introduction is rewritten and discussed again.

4. The authors should add some reports based on the use of NPs for enhancing the soil-plant interactions to strengthen the proposed hypothesis in the introduction section.

Thank you very much for this point. Introduction was rewritten again taking in account the reviewer remarks.

5. Line 61: Thus, ....., the line should be started from a new paragraph. It will bring clarity between the novelty and objectives of the study.

This error is corrected

6. Line 74: Describe why the authors selected the particular local strain of mycorrhiza with its industrial possibilities.

This was our isolate and was used by our Lab in a previous work (Rabie et al., 2005).

7. Line 75: The authors should provide a brief methodology for this section. The data may be provided as supporting information files to avoid text plagiarism, if.

This is given in details and become more understanding.

8. Line 80: Provide geocoordinates of Sharkia province.

The geocoordinates of Sharkia province is provided within the manuscript. It follows Egypt.

9. Most of the methodologies are just mentioned in short sentences which are not recommended. Provide brief protocols for them.

Thank you for this comment. However, certain length of manuscript is allowed for each manuscript. Some of them are given as supplementary file.

10. Line 85: Why you have used an abbreviated form of Dept. Agric. Res. Centre, Giza, Egypt?

This abbreviation is changed to the whole word

11. Line 92: add space between TiO2NPswere.

It is done.

12. Line 98: Direct use of numerical value in the starting of paragraph and sentence? Why?

Such mistakes are corrected as each sentence contained subject +verb+ the rest of the sentence. Sorry.

13. Check for potential typing errors “breaks, spaces, dots, etc., throughout the manuscript.

The grammar and the whole manuscript are reviewed again by Prof. Dr. G. Enan.

14. Line 191: Provide names of software used in this study.

The software is added in the manuscript (WASP software version 2.0).

15. Line 197: Better to provide the information of the FTIR spectrum (9 peaks) as a single table data.

The information of the FTIR spectrum (9 peaks) is already presented in a single table 2.

16. Some asterisks given in the table data are not defined in their footer captions.

These points are very important; the corrections were made and explained.

17. Use uniform font and text formatting in the manuscript.

It was done within the whole manuscript.

18. The level of statistical significance should be provided in the manuscript wherever it is mentioned.

Thank you very much for this point. The level of statistical significance is showed in the manuscript.

19. Have you observed some negative effects of low NP treatment and high salt concentration? Describe in discussion section accordingly with supportive literature.

This is done in the manuscript and some paragraphs are inserted in the discussion section and pointed by green colour.

20. Many references are outdated. Authors are required to replace them with the latest one including https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101463.

As update of references were made and recent ones were added.

21. Figs. resolution is too low and difficult to understand.

The quality of the figures improved.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responce to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ying Ma

15 Jun 2020

Influence of Funneliformis mosseae enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) on Phaseolus vulgaris L. under salinity stress

PONE-D-19-32967R1

Dear Dr. El-Gazzar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ying Ma, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear authors,

Thanks a lot for clarification of your interesting Ms. Based on the revised version (id PONE-D-19-32967), I have decided that the manuscript can be accepted for publication in PLOS ONE. It is a very interesting manuscript.

Reviewer #2: I have no more comments as authors have addressed my all comments with proper explanations.

I suggest accept.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Tancredo Souza

Reviewer #2: Yes: Pankaj Kumar

Acceptance letter

Ying Ma

28 Jul 2020

PONE-D-19-32967R1

Influence of Funneliformis mosseae enhanced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2NPs) on Phaseolus vulgaris L. under salinity stress

Dear Dr. El-Gazzar:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ying Ma

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Effect of salinity levels on sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and translocation.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Amplified Nest and chitin synthase quantity (intensity & relative density) of mycorrhiza levels of Phaseolus plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and TiO2NPs in the presence of salinity.

    (DOCX)

    S1 File. Brief methodologies protocol.

    Brief methodologies protocol for some measurements.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responce to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES