Abstract
Background
Although infrequent, distant metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer is the main cause of mortality in patients and mostly involves the lung, bone, and brain. Distant metastases to other sites in differentiated thyroid cancer patients are rare, thus, the clinical course of unusual metastases has not been adequately researched. In the present study, the clinico-pathological findings and treatment outcomes of unusual metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients in Korea were evaluated.
Patients and methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with unusual metastases in four Korean tertiary hospitals (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Busan National University Hospital, Severance Hospital). Unusual metastases were diagnosed using (1) cytology or histology and/or (2) imaging studies including fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and/or iodine 131 whole body scans with simultaneously elevated serum levels of thyroglobulin. The pathological findings of primary thyroid cancer, diagnostic method for unusual metastases, and treatment responses of unusual metastases were examined.
Results
In all, 25 unusual metastatic foci of 19 patients were analyzed; 13 patients (68.4%) had papillary thyroid carcinoma including 4 follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas. The median time interval between the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer and unusual metastases diagnosis was 110 months (11.0–138.0 months). Only 4 patients (21.1%) had synchronous unusual metastases and 6 patients (31.6%) were symptomatic. Unusual metastases included 19 metastases to solid organs (6 to kidney, 5 to liver, 4 to pancreas, 3 to adrenal gland, and 1 to ovary) and 6 to the skin and muscles. Unusual metastases were pathologically proven in 10 patients (52.6%) and 11 of 16 patients (68.8%) who received iodine 131 whole body scans had radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Among 5 patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 4 treated with lenvatinib showed stable disease or a partial response at the first treatment response. Six patients (31.6%) died due to disease progression during the median 20.0-month follow-up period (11.0–55.0 months).
Conclusion
Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer are thought to be underestimated due to disease rarity and their metachronous nature with other distant metastases. The most of unusual metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients are existed with usual distant metastasis and clinical outcomes of those could not be significantly different from the prognosis of usual distant metastasis.
Introduction
Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTCs) have indolent clinical course and good prognosis with an approximate 85–90% 10-year survival rate [1–3]. Distant metastases from DTCs are uncommon but are one of the main causes of cancer-specific mortality in DTC patients [4]. The 10-year-survival rate is significantly decreased to 10% due to loss of radioiodine avidity of distant metastasis [3, 5]. Distant metastases of DTC are simultaneously observed in approximately 3–5% of patients at the first diagnosis of DTC, which increases up to 20% when a metachronous occurrence pattern is observed [6–8]. Therefore, early detection and appropriate management of distant metastases are critical for better clinical outcomes in patients with advance thyroid cancer.
Distant metastases from DTC mainly involve the lung, bone, and brain [7]. Metastases to other sites from DTC are extremely rare; therefore, the majority of unusual metastases (UMs) have been published as case reports and small case series [9]. The reported incidence of UM in DTC patients is <1% [10], however, UMs might easily be overlooked, particularly when asymptomatic. Recent progress in imaging can increase the detection rate of UM in DTC patients. Due to diverse metastatic sites and disease rarity, previously reported data on the prognosis of UMs are limited and inconsistent [11, 12]. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical characteristics of UMs and evaluated the proper diagnostic and management methods based on metastatic sites and patient status in patients with UMs from DTC.
Patients and methods
Patients
We screened DTC patients who had been treated between January 2000 and August 2016 from four tertiary hospitals in Korea (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Busan National University Hospital, Severance Hospital) and retrospectively reviewed the medical records of DTC patients with distant metastasis. Distant metastases were divided to two groups; usual metastasis and UM. A UM was defined as a distant metastasis to sites excluding the lung, bone, and brain. Skin and muscle metastases were included only if they were not adjacent to the primary thyroid cancer. Diagnoses were made using one of the following methods: pathology based on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and biopsy or imaging using 18fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG PET/CT) scans or 131iodine whole body scans (131I WBS) with simultaneously elevated serum levels of thyroglobulin (Tg). Synchronous UM was defined when the time interval from the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer to UM diagnosis was <6 months. Radioactive iodine (RAI) refractoriness was defined as a lack of RAI uptake or disease progression after RAI therapy within the previous 12 months or cumulative RAI dose ≥ 600 mCi [13]. When anti-Tg antibody was negative according to each institution’s reference value, serum levels of Tg were included in analyses.
All patients underwent total thyroidectomy, and pathological findings of primary thyroid cancer according to AJCC/IUCC (8th edition) [14] and clinical characteristics were recorded. Pathological diagnoses of UMs were obtained using FNAC and biopsy with ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography (CT) guidance, or surgery. Therapeutic modalities included RAI ablation therapy for RAI avid lesions, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The treatment efficacy of TKI therapy was divided into four categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) according to the RECIST version 1.1 criteria [15]. Safety and adverse events (AEs) were monitored according to each institution’s guideline. The TKI dose was reduced when drug-related AEs were intolerable. This study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating hospitals (IRB numbers: CNUHH 2020–131, 4-2020-0626, 2005-001-089, and 2019–1453). All data were fully anonymized before assessment and IRB waived the requirement for informed consent.
Statistical analyses
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or n (%), and continuous variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics, (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Baseline characteristics of UMs in DTC patients
Among investigated total of 38,772 DTC patients, 442 usual distant metastases (1.1%) in 392 patients (321 cases of lung metastases, 105 cases of bone metastases, and 16 cases of brain metastases) and 25 UMs (0.06%) in 19 patients were observed. The median age of the 19 DTC patients with UMs was 68.0 years and most cases were male (68.4%). The most frequent histological type of primary thyroid cancer was PTC with 4 cases of the follicular variant type. Among 16 patients with available TMN stage data of primary thyroid cancer, 9 (43.8%) had distant metastasis at the time of primary thyroid cancer surgery. Only one papillary thyroid microcarcinoma was included and distant metastasis was already observed at the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of DTC patients with UM (n = 19).
N,% | |
---|---|
Median age at time of UM diagnosis (years) (IQR) | 68.0 (59.0–76.0) |
Sex, male (%) | 13 (68.4) |
Histology of primary thyroid cancer | |
PTC | 13 (68.4) |
Classic | 9 (47.4) |
Follicular variant | 3 (15.8) |
Classic and follicular variant | 1 (5.3) |
FTC | 6 (31.6) |
TMN stage (8th edition) (n = 16)* | |
T stage | |
T1a | 1 (5.3) |
T1b | 0 (0.0) |
6 (31.6) | |
T3 | 7 (36.8) |
T4 | 2 (10.5) |
N stage | |
Nx | 4 (25.0) |
N0 | 2 (12.5) |
N1a | 3 (18.8) |
N1b | 7 (43.8) |
M stage | |
M0 | 7 (56.3) |
M1 | 9 (43.8) |
DTC: differentiated thyroid cancer; UM: unusual metastasis; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; FTC: follicular thyroid cancer; RAI: radioactive iodine; IQR: interquartile range
*The 16 patients had TNM staging results of primary thyroid cancer
In the 19 patients, 25 unusual metastatic foci were observed and 19 UMs (76.0%) involved solid organs. Among the solid organ UMs (n = 19), metastasis to the kidney (n = 6) was the most frequent, followed by the liver (n = 5) and the pancreas (n = 4). The muscle metastases (n = 4) involved the vastus lateralis (n = 2), glutes medius (n = 1), and infraspinatus muscles (n = 1). Skin metastases (n = 2) were in the chest wall. Only 6 of the 19 patients (31.6%) had definitive symptoms associated with UMs and 4 patients (21.1%) had synchronous UMs. At the time of UM diagnosis, all but one patient (94.7%), who had only muscle metastasis, had distant metastases to usual metastatic sites. Simultaneous lung metastases were most frequent and 3 patients (15.8%) had multiple metastases to the lung, bone, and brain. Among 16 patients who received diagnostic 131I WBS, 11 (68.8%) showed RAI refractoriness. Among 12 patients who were diagnosed based on 18FDG PET/CT scan, 8 (66.7%) showed FDG avidity. Only one patient with kidney and muscle metastases showed simultaneous RAI and FDG uptake in the metastatic lesion in the kidney (Table 2).
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of UM in DTC (n = 19).
N, % | |
---|---|
Symptomatic | 6 (31.6) |
Synchronous | 4 (21.1) |
Time interval between the first diagnosis of DTC and UM diagnosis (months) (IQR) | 110 (11.0–138.0) |
Largest UM diameter at diagnosis (cm), (IQR) | 3.0 (2.0–5.9) |
Location (25 metastatic foci)* | |
Solid organ | 19 (76.0) |
Kidney | 6 (24.0) |
Liver | 5 (20.0) |
Pancreas | 4 (16.0) |
Adrenal gland | 3 (12.0) |
Ovary | 1 (4.0) |
Muscle | 4 (16.0) |
Skin | 2 (8.0) |
Distant metastasis at the time of UM diagnosis | 18 (94.7) |
Lung only | 9 (47.4) |
Bone only | 1 (5.3) |
Lung and bone | 4 (21.1) |
Lung and brain | 1 (5.3) |
Lung, bone, and brain | 3 (15.8) |
RAI refractoriness at the time of UM diagnosis (n = 16)** | 11 (68.8) |
Lack of RAI uptake | 4 (25.0) |
Progression despite RAI therapy in 12 months or total RAI dose > 600 mCi | 4 (25.0) |
Both | 3 (18.8) |
FDG avidity of UM (n = 12)*** | 8 (66.7) |
UM: unusual metastasis; RAI: radioactive iodine; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CT: computed tomography; FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; IQR: interquartile range; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor
*The 25 metastatic foci of 19 patients were observed. Five patients had more than two UMs.
**The 16 patients diagnosed using I131 whole body scan (WBS) were analyzed for RAI refractoriness
***The 12 patients diagnosed with UMs based on 18FDG PET/CT scans
Pathological diagnostic approach for UM
UMs of 10 patients (52.6%) were pathologically diagnosed based on cytological or histological results. One patient with pancreatic head metastasis was diagnosed using endoscopic US (EUS)-guided FNA and the other patient with pancreatic body and tail metastases was diagnosed using CT-guided FNA. The histological diagnosis was performed using biopsy (n = 5) including US-guided biopsy and excision biopsy. Diagnostic surgery was performed for ovary metastasis (n = 1) (Table 3).
Table 3. Clinical course of UM in DTC patients (n = 19).
Diagnostic method for UM | |
Pathology | 10 (52.6) |
FNA | 4 (21.1) |
Biopsy | 5 (31.3) |
Surgical specimen | 1 (6.3) |
Imaging studies | 9 (47.4) |
RAI uptake ± CT/MRI | 2 (10.5) |
18-FDG uptake ± CT/MRI | 7 (36.8) |
First-line therapy for UM | |
Observation | 4 (21.1) |
Local treatment | 5 (31.3) |
Surgery (including excision) | 3 (15.8) |
RFA | 2 (10.5) |
Systemic treatment | 10 (52.6) |
TKI therapy | 5 (31.3) |
RAI ablation therapy | 4 (21.1) |
Systemic chemotherapy | 1 (5.3) |
Mortality rate | 6 (31.6) |
Cancer-related mortality | 6 (31.6) |
Treatment-related mortality | 0 (0.0) |
Median follow-up months from UM diagnosis (IQR) | 20.0 (11.0–55.0) |
UM: unusual metastasis; RAI: radioactive iodine; FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor; IQR: interquartile range
Treatment strategies for UM
Among the 19 patients with UM, 4 (21.1%) received only supportive care without any intervention due to poor patient condition or economic problems. UM treatments included local treatment for isolated metastasis and systemic treatment. Two patients (one with skin metastasis on the chest wall, and one with thigh muscle metastasis) had surgeries and both metastatic lesions did not recur during the follow-up period. The patient who underwent diagnostic oophorectomy for ambiguous ovarian lesion had no recurrence in the ovary. Two patients with renal metastases underwent RFA and both lesions shrunk and the disease remained stable. Among 10 patients who had systemic treatment, 4 underwent RAI therapy. When therapeutic 131I WBS was performed for lung metastases, one male patient was found to have unsuspected thigh muscle metastasis and the US-guided FNA of the muscle lesion confirmed the metastasis was from PTC (Fig 1). CR of muscle metastasis was attained based on surgical specimens of post-RAI surgery for the remnant lesion. Five patients received TKI therapy for RR DTC. One patient with adrenal, renal, and hepatic metastases treated daily with 600 mg sorafenib had to discontinue TKI therapy due to grade 3 plantar-palmar erythrodysaesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) before the evaluation of drug response. Four patients were treated with lenvatinib. One PTC patient with lung metastasis was treated with lenvatinib therapy for newly detected hepatic metastasis as a sorafenib salvage therapy and the first treatment response showed SD, however, PD was observed at 10 months after starting lenvatinib. Among three patients treated with lenvatinib therapy for pancreatic metastasis, two PTC patients showed marked tumor regression (Fig 2) and one FTC patient with lung and pleura metastases died due to disease progression although pancreatic metastasis showed SD. Table 4 summarizes the clinical characteristics and courses of TKI-naïve RR DTC patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib.
Table 4. Treatment response of three TKI-naive patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib.
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Age/Sex | 74/M | 61/M | 68/F |
Initial TNM stage (8th edition) | T3NxM0 | T3N1bM0 | T3N1bM1 |
Symptom | Yes | No | Yes |
Other metastasis | Lung | Lung, bone | Lung |
FDG avidity | Yes | NA | No |
Largest UM diameter at diagnosis (cm) | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.4 |
Largest UM diameter at best response (cm) | 1.5 | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Serum levels of Tg before lenvatinib | 186.0 | 1615.0 | 249.7 |
Serum levels of Tg at best response | 22.64 | 48.90 | 208.0 |
Duration of lenvatinib therapy (months) | 26 | 23 | 5 |
Treatment response | PR = >SD | PR = >SD | SD = >PD |
Treatment-related AEs | Proteinuria, pancreatic enzyme elevation | Proteinuria, HTN, blood glucose elevation | HTN, edema, constipation |
Follow-up duration from UM diagnosis (months) | 36 | 23 | 16 |
Mortality | Alive | Alive | Dead |
FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; NA: not assessed; UM: unusual metastasis; Tg: thyroglobulin: PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; AEs: adverse events; HTN
Prognosis of UM
The cancer-related mortality was 31.6% (n = 6) in the 19 patients. Median OS was 68.0 months and mean OS was 58.3 months during the median 20.0-month follow-up period (11.0–55.0 months) (Fig 3).
Discussion
UMs in DTC patients have been reported in only a few case reports and small series due to disease rarity, thus, clinical characteristics and disease course of UM have not been adequately researched [9, 12]. In a recent study, a low incidence of UM (36 of 3,982 DTC patients, 0.9%) and poor prognosis were reported, however, 12 cases of brain metastases were included, which could explain the high mortality [10]. The National Epidemiologic Survey of Thyroid cancer (NEST) study based on the Korea Central Cancer Registry demonstrated 34 distant metastases (0.6%) among total 5,796 thyroid cancer patients during 10.6 years of follow-up [16]. So, our data is in accordance with Korean nationwide data. The low incidence of distant metastases might be due to early surgery and high incidence of small papillary microcarcinoma in Korea.
Some case reports and series have shown that synchronous UM in DTC patients presenting initially with UM-related symptoms, but they have difficulty in finding the primary cancer origin due to unusual metastatic sites [17]. However, the most of UMs from DTC were found to develop metachronously in previous studies [10, 12]. Only 4 patients (21.1%) in our study had synchronous UM, indicating a higher incidence of UMs in advanced thyroid cancer during long-term follow-up with diverse imaging modalities such as PET-CT, 131I WBS, and CT scans due to a metachronous pattern. In a multicenter study in Korea, 5 of 57 (8.8%) TKI-naive RR DTC patients had UMs to the liver (n = 2), adrenal gland (n = 2), and kidney (n = 1) [18]. In previous studies, the focus has been on the metastatic site and OS, and UM treatment modalities have been limited to radiation therapy and mainly surgery for local control when the metastatic lesion showed RAI non-avidity [19–21]. When the long-term outcome of metastasectomy in thyroid cancer patients with liver and pancreatic metastasis was investigated, the effectiveness of surgery was demonstrated only for isolated hepatic metastasis [11]. However, UMs from DTC usually occur in advanced and aggressive thyroid cancer and other distant metastases exist simultaneously [22]. Surgery may be the best choice for patients with good general condition and isolated resectable UMs; however, minimally invasive procedures including RFA, microwave ablation and TKI therapy could be better treatment options for patients with co-morbidities or multiple metastases [23–25]. In the present study, 3 DTC patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib showed PR (n = 2) and SD (n = 1) at the time of the best response. The UMs involved a broad spectrum of metastatic sites; thus, diagnostic and treatment strategies based on metastatic site are necessary.
We diagnosed UMs via cytology and/or histology and imaging using 18FDG PET/CT scan or 131I WBS. FNA or biopsy for newly detected UMs are not mandatory in patients with already widespread multiple metastases, however, pathological diagnosis is helpful to exclude other diseases in some cases. If procedure-related risks and expenses are acceptable, pathological diagnosis can be considered when treatment modalities can be modified with accurate UM diagnosis. In the present study, 52.6% of the 19 patients were pathologically diagnosed mainly using US-guided FNA or biopsy. In patients with pancreatic metastasis, a diagnostic method was selected based on pancreatic tumor location. EUS-guided FNA was used for UMs to the pancreatic head and CT-guided FNA for UMs to the pancreas body and tail. Surgical or CT-guided biopsy has been used to diagnosis pancreatic metastasis in the past, however, EUS-guided FNA has been reported in recent studies as a potentially reliable diagnostic tool for pancreatic metastasis [26, 27]. UMs were detected in 18FDG PET/CT scans or 131I WBS and then additional imaging modalities including CT and MRI were performed to determine tumor size, invasiveness, and structural characteristics.
The treatment strategies for UMs are divided into systemic and local therapy based on patient condition, UM location, and thyroid cancer status. As a local therapy for isolated or locally controllable UMs, surgery (metastasectomy or excision) has been the treatment of choice and external beam radiation and RFA have been used in previous studies [11, 19, 28, 29]. In the present study, two excisions (one for a muscle metastasis and one for a skin metastasis on the chest wall), one diagnostic oophorectomy, and two RFAs for renal metastases were performed as local treatment. Targeted tumor regression and stabilization were observed in all patients treated using local therapy. Systemic therapy is considered when a patient has widespread disease or involvement of an inoperable critical organ. The mainstream systemic therapy for metastasis in DTC patients is RAI therapy, however, before the development of TKIs, treatment options were not available when metastatic lesions showed RAI non-avidity [5]. Several systemic chemotherapies have been attempted, which are not recommended for RR DTC due to serious AEs with no survival benefit [30]. In the present study, one patient who underwent systemic chemotherapy for renal metastasis discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Since approval for TKI therapy for advanced thyroid cancer, the use of TKIs in advanced thyroid cancer patients with UM has been reported in several cases [11]. Previously reported cases treated with sorafenib have shown shortly delayed disease progression but unclear survival benefit in patients with liver and pancreatic metastases from advanced thyroid cancer [31, 32]. However, in a recent case report of a PTC patient with multiple simultaneous metastases to the pancreas, kidney, gluteus maximus muscle, and lung who was treated with lenvatinib, SD was observed during follow-up 13 months after starting lenvatinib [33]. In our series, five patients received TKI therapy and four patients with lenvatinib showed a treatment response. Among three TKI-naïve patients with pancreatic metastases were treated with lenvatinib, one patient died due to disease progression of other metastatic lesions although drug response of pancreas metastasis showed SD. The other two patients showed PR at the first response evaluation and maintained SD. During lenvatinib therapy, well-known AEs including hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue were observed. In addition, rare AEs associated with pancreatic tumor treatment including elevated pancreatic enzymes and blood glucose were observed in patients with pancreatic metastases, which were manageable with supportive care and insulin therapy. When TKI therapy is initiated for UMs in DTC patients, rare drug-related AEs should be considered.
The prognosis of thyroid cancer patients with UM has not been adequately evaluated, and the data reported have been inconsistent [34, 35]. In a systematic review of rare metastases in DTC patients, the mean OS of 94 patients from 77 studies was 60 months [12], similar to the mean OS observed in the present study (58.3 months). In a recent study, a high cancer-specific mortality of 58.3% was observed (21 of 36 patients) during the median follow-up period of 13 months after UM diagnosis, however, the study included 12 patients with UM to the brain, of whom 9 died [10]. The survival data of UM in DTC patients are discordant based on UM location and treatment modality. In a systematic review that included 16 patients in 15 studies, the mean OS was 37.6 months in DTC patients with pancreatic or hepatic metastases and who received surgical resection [11]. Predicting prognosis in patients with UM is difficult. In addition, the prognosis of UM is associated with disease status of primary thyroid cancer such as simultaneous distant metastases to other organs and RAI refractoriness. In the present study, almost all patients, except one patient with isolated UM to the infraspinatus muscle, showed other distant metastases. Six patients (31.6%) in our study died due to disease progression and all had solid organ UMs. Three patients with multiple distant metastases including two brain metastases with synchronous UMs died 6 months after the first diagnosis of advanced thyroid cancer.
The present study had several limitations due to the retrospective study design. Primary thyroid cancer TNM staging and pathologic diagnosis of UMs were not obtained in all cohort patients and BRAF mutation analyses on pathologic specimens were performed in only a few patients. Regular follow-up measurements of serum levels of Tg and imaging studies were not performed with the same time interval due to multi-center involvement.
Despite the limitations, our results demonstrate the clinical course of UMs in DTC patients including diagnostic methods and several management modalities. Early detection and TKI therapy for selected DTC patients with UM could improve clinical outcomes.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Schulumberger MJ. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(5):297–306. 10.1056/NEJM199801293380506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Links TP, van Tol KM, Jager PL, Plukker JT, Piers DA, Boezen HM, et al. Life expectancy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a novel approach to survival analysis. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12(2):273–80. 10.1677/erc.1.00892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Durante C, Haddy N, Baudin E, Leboulleux S, Hartl D, Travagli JP, et al. Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2892–9. 10.1210/jc.2005-2838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kitamura Y, Shimizu K, Nagahama M, Sugino K, Ozaki O, Mimura T, et al. Immediate causes of death in thyroid carcinoma: clinicopathological analysis of 161 fatal cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):4043–9. 10.1210/jcem.84.11.6115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schlumberger M, Brose M, Elisei R, Leboulleux S, Luster M, Pitoia F, et al. Definition and management of radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(5):356–8. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70215-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim H, Kim HI, Kim SW, Jung J, Jeon MJ, Kim WG, et al. Prognosis of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma with Initial Distant Metastasis: A Multicenter Study in Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(2):287–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ruegemer JJ, Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Ryan JJ, Offord KP, Gorman CA. Distant metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(3):501–8. 10.1210/jcem-67-3-501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Busaidy NL, Cabanillas ME. Differentiated thyroid cancer: management of patients with radioiodine nonresponsive disease. J Thyroid Res. 2012;2012(doi):618985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Portela RA, Choby GW, Manni A, Campbell D, Crist H, Goldenberg D. Unusual sites of metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer: Case series and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2015;94(8):E43–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zunino A, Pitoia F, Faure E, Reyes A, Sala M, Sklate R, et al. Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma: analysis of 36 cases. Endocrine. 2019;65(3):630–6. 10.1007/s12020-019-01991-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paspala A, Kostakis ID, Gaitanidis A, Prodromidou A, Schizas D, Machairas N. Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections for Metastases from Thyroid Cancer: a Systematic Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019;50(1):9–15. 10.1007/s12029-018-00196-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Madani A, Jozaghi Y, Tabah R, How J, Mitmaker E. Rare metastases of well-differentiated thyroid cancers: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):460–6. 10.1245/s10434-014-4058-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):621–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1406470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed New York: springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oh CM, Kong HJ, Kim EY, Kim HJ, Jung KW, Park SH et al. National Epidemiologic Survey of Thyroid Cancer (NEST) in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018052 10.4178/epih.e2018052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tunio MA, Alasiri M, Riaz K, Alshakwer W, Alarifi M. Skeletal Muscle Metastasis as an Initial Presentation of Follicualr Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2013; 192573 10.1155/2013/192573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee EK, Kim SM, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lim DJ, Kim MH, et al. Lesion-Based Evaluation Predicts Treatment Response to Lenvatinib for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Korean Multicenter Retrospective Study. Thyroid. 2019;29(12):1811–9. 10.1089/thy.2019.0022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meyer A, behrend M. Is pancreatic resection justified for metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer? Anticancer Res. 2006;26(3B):2269–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim SH, Brennan MF, Russo P, Burt ME, Coit DG. The role of surgery in the treatment of clinically isolated adrenal metastasis. Cancer. 1998;82(2):389–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Malhotra G, Upadhye TS, Sridhar E, Asopa RV, Garde PS, Gawde S, et al. Unusual case of adrenal and renal metastases from papillary carcinoma of thyroid. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35(9):731–6. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181ea342b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Song HJ, Xue YL, Qiu ZL, Luo QY. Uncommon metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Hell J of Nucl Med. 2012;15(3):233–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Segkos K, Schmidt C, Nabhan F. Isolated Liver Metastasis in Hürthle Cell Thyroid Cancer Treated with Microwave Ablation. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2017:4 pages. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wertenbroek MW, Links TP, Prins TR, Plukker JT, van der Jagt EJ, de Jong KP. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2008;18(10):1105–10. 10.1089/thy.2008.0080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Velasco A, Castillo O, Vidal I, Sánchez-Salas R, Campos R, Cabello R, et al. [Nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of small renal tumors. The role of radiofrequency]. Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62(1):49–55. 10.4321/s0004-06142009000100007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Siddiqui AA, Olansky L, Sawh RN, Tierney WM. Pancreatic metastasis of tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. JOP. 2006;7(4):417–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen L, Brainard JA. Pancreatic metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a case report. Acta Cytol. 2010;54(4):640–4. 10.1159/000325192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Djenic B, Duick D, Newell JO, Demeure MJ. Solitary liver metastasis from follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;6C:146–9. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.11.080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Angeles-Angeles A, Chable-Montero F, Martinez-Benitez B, Albores-Saavedra J. Unusual metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma: report of 2 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13(3):189–96. 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2008.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. 10.1089/thy.2015.0020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Farina E, Monari F, Tallini G, Repaci A, Mazzarotto R, Giunchi F, et al. Unusual Thyroid Carcinoma Metastases: a Case Series and Literature Review. Endocr Pathol. 2016;27(1):55–64. 10.1007/s12022-015-9410-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alzahrani AS, AlQaraawi A, Al Sohaibani F, Almanea H, Abalkhail H. Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy. Thyroid. 2012;22(5):536–41. 10.1089/thy.2011.0247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang J, Ma Y, Gong Y, Gong R, Li Z, Zhu J. Multiple Simultaneous Rare Distant Metastases as the Initial Presentation of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Herbowski L. Skeletal muscle metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas: An extensive review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7083–9. 10.3892/ol.2018.8216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davidson M, Olsen RJ, Ewton AA, Robbins RJ. Pancreas Metastases from Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Review of the Literature. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(12):1425–9. 10.4158/EP-2017-0001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]