Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0238207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238207

Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancers: A multicenter study in Korea

Jee Hee Yoon 1, Min Ji Jeon 2, Mijin Kim 3, A Ram Hong 1, Hee Kyung Kim 1, Dong Yeob Shin 4, Bo Hyun Kim 3, Won Bae Kim 2, Young Kee Shong 2, Ho-Cheol Kang 1,*
Editor: Domenico Albano5
PMCID: PMC7447021  PMID: 32841270

Abstract

Background

Although infrequent, distant metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer is the main cause of mortality in patients and mostly involves the lung, bone, and brain. Distant metastases to other sites in differentiated thyroid cancer patients are rare, thus, the clinical course of unusual metastases has not been adequately researched. In the present study, the clinico-pathological findings and treatment outcomes of unusual metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients in Korea were evaluated.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with unusual metastases in four Korean tertiary hospitals (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Busan National University Hospital, Severance Hospital). Unusual metastases were diagnosed using (1) cytology or histology and/or (2) imaging studies including fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and/or iodine 131 whole body scans with simultaneously elevated serum levels of thyroglobulin. The pathological findings of primary thyroid cancer, diagnostic method for unusual metastases, and treatment responses of unusual metastases were examined.

Results

In all, 25 unusual metastatic foci of 19 patients were analyzed; 13 patients (68.4%) had papillary thyroid carcinoma including 4 follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas. The median time interval between the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer and unusual metastases diagnosis was 110 months (11.0–138.0 months). Only 4 patients (21.1%) had synchronous unusual metastases and 6 patients (31.6%) were symptomatic. Unusual metastases included 19 metastases to solid organs (6 to kidney, 5 to liver, 4 to pancreas, 3 to adrenal gland, and 1 to ovary) and 6 to the skin and muscles. Unusual metastases were pathologically proven in 10 patients (52.6%) and 11 of 16 patients (68.8%) who received iodine 131 whole body scans had radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Among 5 patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 4 treated with lenvatinib showed stable disease or a partial response at the first treatment response. Six patients (31.6%) died due to disease progression during the median 20.0-month follow-up period (11.0–55.0 months).

Conclusion

Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer are thought to be underestimated due to disease rarity and their metachronous nature with other distant metastases. The most of unusual metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients are existed with usual distant metastasis and clinical outcomes of those could not be significantly different from the prognosis of usual distant metastasis.

Introduction

Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTCs) have indolent clinical course and good prognosis with an approximate 85–90% 10-year survival rate [13]. Distant metastases from DTCs are uncommon but are one of the main causes of cancer-specific mortality in DTC patients [4]. The 10-year-survival rate is significantly decreased to 10% due to loss of radioiodine avidity of distant metastasis [3, 5]. Distant metastases of DTC are simultaneously observed in approximately 3–5% of patients at the first diagnosis of DTC, which increases up to 20% when a metachronous occurrence pattern is observed [68]. Therefore, early detection and appropriate management of distant metastases are critical for better clinical outcomes in patients with advance thyroid cancer.

Distant metastases from DTC mainly involve the lung, bone, and brain [7]. Metastases to other sites from DTC are extremely rare; therefore, the majority of unusual metastases (UMs) have been published as case reports and small case series [9]. The reported incidence of UM in DTC patients is <1% [10], however, UMs might easily be overlooked, particularly when asymptomatic. Recent progress in imaging can increase the detection rate of UM in DTC patients. Due to diverse metastatic sites and disease rarity, previously reported data on the prognosis of UMs are limited and inconsistent [11, 12]. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical characteristics of UMs and evaluated the proper diagnostic and management methods based on metastatic sites and patient status in patients with UMs from DTC.

Patients and methods

Patients

We screened DTC patients who had been treated between January 2000 and August 2016 from four tertiary hospitals in Korea (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Busan National University Hospital, Severance Hospital) and retrospectively reviewed the medical records of DTC patients with distant metastasis. Distant metastases were divided to two groups; usual metastasis and UM. A UM was defined as a distant metastasis to sites excluding the lung, bone, and brain. Skin and muscle metastases were included only if they were not adjacent to the primary thyroid cancer. Diagnoses were made using one of the following methods: pathology based on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and biopsy or imaging using 18fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG PET/CT) scans or 131iodine whole body scans (131I WBS) with simultaneously elevated serum levels of thyroglobulin (Tg). Synchronous UM was defined when the time interval from the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer to UM diagnosis was <6 months. Radioactive iodine (RAI) refractoriness was defined as a lack of RAI uptake or disease progression after RAI therapy within the previous 12 months or cumulative RAI dose ≥ 600 mCi [13]. When anti-Tg antibody was negative according to each institution’s reference value, serum levels of Tg were included in analyses.

All patients underwent total thyroidectomy, and pathological findings of primary thyroid cancer according to AJCC/IUCC (8th edition) [14] and clinical characteristics were recorded. Pathological diagnoses of UMs were obtained using FNAC and biopsy with ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography (CT) guidance, or surgery. Therapeutic modalities included RAI ablation therapy for RAI avid lesions, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The treatment efficacy of TKI therapy was divided into four categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) according to the RECIST version 1.1 criteria [15]. Safety and adverse events (AEs) were monitored according to each institution’s guideline. The TKI dose was reduced when drug-related AEs were intolerable. This study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating hospitals (IRB numbers: CNUHH 2020–131, 4-2020-0626, 2005-001-089, and 2019–1453). All data were fully anonymized before assessment and IRB waived the requirement for informed consent.

Statistical analyses

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or n (%), and continuous variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics, (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of UMs in DTC patients

Among investigated total of 38,772 DTC patients, 442 usual distant metastases (1.1%) in 392 patients (321 cases of lung metastases, 105 cases of bone metastases, and 16 cases of brain metastases) and 25 UMs (0.06%) in 19 patients were observed. The median age of the 19 DTC patients with UMs was 68.0 years and most cases were male (68.4%). The most frequent histological type of primary thyroid cancer was PTC with 4 cases of the follicular variant type. Among 16 patients with available TMN stage data of primary thyroid cancer, 9 (43.8%) had distant metastasis at the time of primary thyroid cancer surgery. Only one papillary thyroid microcarcinoma was included and distant metastasis was already observed at the first diagnosis of primary thyroid cancer (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of DTC patients with UM (n = 19).

N,%
Median age at time of UM diagnosis (years) (IQR) 68.0 (59.0–76.0)
Sex, male (%) 13 (68.4)
Histology of primary thyroid cancer
PTC 13 (68.4)
 Classic 9 (47.4)
 Follicular variant 3 (15.8)
 Classic and follicular variant 1 (5.3)
FTC 6 (31.6)
TMN stage (8th edition) (n = 16)*
T stage
 T1a 1 (5.3)
 T1b 0 (0.0)
6 (31.6)
 T3 7 (36.8)
 T4 2 (10.5)
N stage
 Nx 4 (25.0)
 N0 2 (12.5)
 N1a 3 (18.8)
 N1b 7 (43.8)
M stage
 M0 7 (56.3)
 M1 9 (43.8)

DTC: differentiated thyroid cancer; UM: unusual metastasis; PTC: papillary thyroid cancer; FTC: follicular thyroid cancer; RAI: radioactive iodine; IQR: interquartile range

*The 16 patients had TNM staging results of primary thyroid cancer

In the 19 patients, 25 unusual metastatic foci were observed and 19 UMs (76.0%) involved solid organs. Among the solid organ UMs (n = 19), metastasis to the kidney (n = 6) was the most frequent, followed by the liver (n = 5) and the pancreas (n = 4). The muscle metastases (n = 4) involved the vastus lateralis (n = 2), glutes medius (n = 1), and infraspinatus muscles (n = 1). Skin metastases (n = 2) were in the chest wall. Only 6 of the 19 patients (31.6%) had definitive symptoms associated with UMs and 4 patients (21.1%) had synchronous UMs. At the time of UM diagnosis, all but one patient (94.7%), who had only muscle metastasis, had distant metastases to usual metastatic sites. Simultaneous lung metastases were most frequent and 3 patients (15.8%) had multiple metastases to the lung, bone, and brain. Among 16 patients who received diagnostic 131I WBS, 11 (68.8%) showed RAI refractoriness. Among 12 patients who were diagnosed based on 18FDG PET/CT scan, 8 (66.7%) showed FDG avidity. Only one patient with kidney and muscle metastases showed simultaneous RAI and FDG uptake in the metastatic lesion in the kidney (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of UM in DTC (n = 19).

N, %
Symptomatic 6 (31.6)
Synchronous 4 (21.1)
Time interval between the first diagnosis of DTC and UM diagnosis (months) (IQR) 110 (11.0–138.0)
Largest UM diameter at diagnosis (cm), (IQR) 3.0 (2.0–5.9)
Location (25 metastatic foci)*
 Solid organ 19 (76.0)
 Kidney 6 (24.0)
 Liver 5 (20.0)
 Pancreas 4 (16.0)
 Adrenal gland 3 (12.0)
 Ovary 1 (4.0)
 Muscle 4 (16.0)
 Skin 2 (8.0)
Distant metastasis at the time of UM diagnosis 18 (94.7)
 Lung only 9 (47.4)
 Bone only 1 (5.3)
 Lung and bone 4 (21.1)
 Lung and brain 1 (5.3)
 Lung, bone, and brain 3 (15.8)
RAI refractoriness at the time of UM diagnosis (n = 16)** 11 (68.8)
 Lack of RAI uptake 4 (25.0)
 Progression despite RAI therapy in 12 months or total RAI dose > 600 mCi 4 (25.0)
 Both 3 (18.8)
FDG avidity of UM (n = 12)*** 8 (66.7)

UM: unusual metastasis; RAI: radioactive iodine; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CT: computed tomography; FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; IQR: interquartile range; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

*The 25 metastatic foci of 19 patients were observed. Five patients had more than two UMs.

**The 16 patients diagnosed using I131 whole body scan (WBS) were analyzed for RAI refractoriness

***The 12 patients diagnosed with UMs based on 18FDG PET/CT scans

Pathological diagnostic approach for UM

UMs of 10 patients (52.6%) were pathologically diagnosed based on cytological or histological results. One patient with pancreatic head metastasis was diagnosed using endoscopic US (EUS)-guided FNA and the other patient with pancreatic body and tail metastases was diagnosed using CT-guided FNA. The histological diagnosis was performed using biopsy (n = 5) including US-guided biopsy and excision biopsy. Diagnostic surgery was performed for ovary metastasis (n = 1) (Table 3).

Table 3. Clinical course of UM in DTC patients (n = 19).

Diagnostic method for UM
 Pathology 10 (52.6)
 FNA 4 (21.1)
 Biopsy 5 (31.3)
 Surgical specimen 1 (6.3)
 Imaging studies 9 (47.4)
 RAI uptake ± CT/MRI 2 (10.5)
 18-FDG uptake ± CT/MRI 7 (36.8)
First-line therapy for UM
 Observation 4 (21.1)
 Local treatment 5 (31.3)
 Surgery (including excision) 3 (15.8)
 RFA 2 (10.5)
 Systemic treatment 10 (52.6)
  TKI therapy 5 (31.3)
  RAI ablation therapy 4 (21.1)
  Systemic chemotherapy 1 (5.3)
Mortality rate 6 (31.6)
 Cancer-related mortality 6 (31.6)
 Treatment-related mortality 0 (0.0)
Median follow-up months from UM diagnosis (IQR) 20.0 (11.0–55.0)

UM: unusual metastasis; RAI: radioactive iodine; FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor; IQR: interquartile range

Treatment strategies for UM

Among the 19 patients with UM, 4 (21.1%) received only supportive care without any intervention due to poor patient condition or economic problems. UM treatments included local treatment for isolated metastasis and systemic treatment. Two patients (one with skin metastasis on the chest wall, and one with thigh muscle metastasis) had surgeries and both metastatic lesions did not recur during the follow-up period. The patient who underwent diagnostic oophorectomy for ambiguous ovarian lesion had no recurrence in the ovary. Two patients with renal metastases underwent RFA and both lesions shrunk and the disease remained stable. Among 10 patients who had systemic treatment, 4 underwent RAI therapy. When therapeutic 131I WBS was performed for lung metastases, one male patient was found to have unsuspected thigh muscle metastasis and the US-guided FNA of the muscle lesion confirmed the metastasis was from PTC (Fig 1). CR of muscle metastasis was attained based on surgical specimens of post-RAI surgery for the remnant lesion. Five patients received TKI therapy for RR DTC. One patient with adrenal, renal, and hepatic metastases treated daily with 600 mg sorafenib had to discontinue TKI therapy due to grade 3 plantar-palmar erythrodysaesthesia (hand-foot syndrome) before the evaluation of drug response. Four patients were treated with lenvatinib. One PTC patient with lung metastasis was treated with lenvatinib therapy for newly detected hepatic metastasis as a sorafenib salvage therapy and the first treatment response showed SD, however, PD was observed at 10 months after starting lenvatinib. Among three patients treated with lenvatinib therapy for pancreatic metastasis, two PTC patients showed marked tumor regression (Fig 2) and one FTC patient with lung and pleura metastases died due to disease progression although pancreatic metastasis showed SD. Table 4 summarizes the clinical characteristics and courses of TKI-naïve RR DTC patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib.

Fig 1. A 34-year-old male patient with follicular variant-papillary thyroid cancer (FV-PTC) showed diffuse lung metastases and unusual metastases to the vastus lateralis muscle in the right thigh.

Fig 1

(A) 131Iodine whole body scan showed radioactive iodine avidity in the anterior neck and metastatic lesions in the neck, both lungs, and right thigh muscles. (B) Ultrasonography showed a round hypoechoic lesion in the muscle of the right thigh. (C) Fine-needle aspiration indicated muscle metastasis from FV-PTC.

Fig 2. A 71-year-old male patient presenting with pancreatic metastasis from papillary thyroid cancer.

Fig 2

(A, B, C) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy showed metastatic PTC on the pancreatic head mass. (A): Hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) staining of FNA (x 400), (B): H-E staining of biopsy (x400), (C): BRAFV600E staining, (D) Abdomen computed tomography (CT) showed 6.9 cm heterogeneously enhancing mass on the pancreatic head before lenvatinib therapy. (E) Follow-up abdomen CT at 3 months after lenvatinib therapy showed the pancreatic tumor decreased in size from 6.9 cm to 4.1 cm. (F) Follow-up abdomen CT at 24 months after lenvatinib therapy showed that the pancreatic tumor was significantly reduced to 1.2 cm.

Table 4. Treatment response of three TKI-naive patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib.

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
Age/Sex 74/M 61/M 68/F
Initial TNM stage (8th edition) T3NxM0 T3N1bM0 T3N1bM1
Symptom Yes No Yes
Other metastasis Lung Lung, bone Lung
FDG avidity Yes NA No
Largest UM diameter at diagnosis (cm) 6.0 7.0 5.4
Largest UM diameter at best response (cm) 1.5 2.5 5.1
Serum levels of Tg before lenvatinib 186.0 1615.0 249.7
Serum levels of Tg at best response 22.64 48.90 208.0
Duration of lenvatinib therapy (months) 26 23 5
Treatment response PR = >SD PR = >SD SD = >PD
Treatment-related AEs Proteinuria, pancreatic enzyme elevation Proteinuria, HTN, blood glucose elevation HTN, edema, constipation
Follow-up duration from UM diagnosis (months) 36 23 16
Mortality Alive Alive Dead

FDG: fluoro-deoxy-glucose; NA: not assessed; UM: unusual metastasis; Tg: thyroglobulin: PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; AEs: adverse events; HTN

Prognosis of UM

The cancer-related mortality was 31.6% (n = 6) in the 19 patients. Median OS was 68.0 months and mean OS was 58.3 months during the median 20.0-month follow-up period (11.0–55.0 months) (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Overall survival (OS) in patients with unusual metastases based on Kaplan-Meier curve.

Fig 3

Discussion

UMs in DTC patients have been reported in only a few case reports and small series due to disease rarity, thus, clinical characteristics and disease course of UM have not been adequately researched [9, 12]. In a recent study, a low incidence of UM (36 of 3,982 DTC patients, 0.9%) and poor prognosis were reported, however, 12 cases of brain metastases were included, which could explain the high mortality [10]. The National Epidemiologic Survey of Thyroid cancer (NEST) study based on the Korea Central Cancer Registry demonstrated 34 distant metastases (0.6%) among total 5,796 thyroid cancer patients during 10.6 years of follow-up [16]. So, our data is in accordance with Korean nationwide data. The low incidence of distant metastases might be due to early surgery and high incidence of small papillary microcarcinoma in Korea.

Some case reports and series have shown that synchronous UM in DTC patients presenting initially with UM-related symptoms, but they have difficulty in finding the primary cancer origin due to unusual metastatic sites [17]. However, the most of UMs from DTC were found to develop metachronously in previous studies [10, 12]. Only 4 patients (21.1%) in our study had synchronous UM, indicating a higher incidence of UMs in advanced thyroid cancer during long-term follow-up with diverse imaging modalities such as PET-CT, 131I WBS, and CT scans due to a metachronous pattern. In a multicenter study in Korea, 5 of 57 (8.8%) TKI-naive RR DTC patients had UMs to the liver (n = 2), adrenal gland (n = 2), and kidney (n = 1) [18]. In previous studies, the focus has been on the metastatic site and OS, and UM treatment modalities have been limited to radiation therapy and mainly surgery for local control when the metastatic lesion showed RAI non-avidity [1921]. When the long-term outcome of metastasectomy in thyroid cancer patients with liver and pancreatic metastasis was investigated, the effectiveness of surgery was demonstrated only for isolated hepatic metastasis [11]. However, UMs from DTC usually occur in advanced and aggressive thyroid cancer and other distant metastases exist simultaneously [22]. Surgery may be the best choice for patients with good general condition and isolated resectable UMs; however, minimally invasive procedures including RFA, microwave ablation and TKI therapy could be better treatment options for patients with co-morbidities or multiple metastases [2325]. In the present study, 3 DTC patients with pancreatic metastasis treated with lenvatinib showed PR (n = 2) and SD (n = 1) at the time of the best response. The UMs involved a broad spectrum of metastatic sites; thus, diagnostic and treatment strategies based on metastatic site are necessary.

We diagnosed UMs via cytology and/or histology and imaging using 18FDG PET/CT scan or 131I WBS. FNA or biopsy for newly detected UMs are not mandatory in patients with already widespread multiple metastases, however, pathological diagnosis is helpful to exclude other diseases in some cases. If procedure-related risks and expenses are acceptable, pathological diagnosis can be considered when treatment modalities can be modified with accurate UM diagnosis. In the present study, 52.6% of the 19 patients were pathologically diagnosed mainly using US-guided FNA or biopsy. In patients with pancreatic metastasis, a diagnostic method was selected based on pancreatic tumor location. EUS-guided FNA was used for UMs to the pancreatic head and CT-guided FNA for UMs to the pancreas body and tail. Surgical or CT-guided biopsy has been used to diagnosis pancreatic metastasis in the past, however, EUS-guided FNA has been reported in recent studies as a potentially reliable diagnostic tool for pancreatic metastasis [26, 27]. UMs were detected in 18FDG PET/CT scans or 131I WBS and then additional imaging modalities including CT and MRI were performed to determine tumor size, invasiveness, and structural characteristics.

The treatment strategies for UMs are divided into systemic and local therapy based on patient condition, UM location, and thyroid cancer status. As a local therapy for isolated or locally controllable UMs, surgery (metastasectomy or excision) has been the treatment of choice and external beam radiation and RFA have been used in previous studies [11, 19, 28, 29]. In the present study, two excisions (one for a muscle metastasis and one for a skin metastasis on the chest wall), one diagnostic oophorectomy, and two RFAs for renal metastases were performed as local treatment. Targeted tumor regression and stabilization were observed in all patients treated using local therapy. Systemic therapy is considered when a patient has widespread disease or involvement of an inoperable critical organ. The mainstream systemic therapy for metastasis in DTC patients is RAI therapy, however, before the development of TKIs, treatment options were not available when metastatic lesions showed RAI non-avidity [5]. Several systemic chemotherapies have been attempted, which are not recommended for RR DTC due to serious AEs with no survival benefit [30]. In the present study, one patient who underwent systemic chemotherapy for renal metastasis discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Since approval for TKI therapy for advanced thyroid cancer, the use of TKIs in advanced thyroid cancer patients with UM has been reported in several cases [11]. Previously reported cases treated with sorafenib have shown shortly delayed disease progression but unclear survival benefit in patients with liver and pancreatic metastases from advanced thyroid cancer [31, 32]. However, in a recent case report of a PTC patient with multiple simultaneous metastases to the pancreas, kidney, gluteus maximus muscle, and lung who was treated with lenvatinib, SD was observed during follow-up 13 months after starting lenvatinib [33]. In our series, five patients received TKI therapy and four patients with lenvatinib showed a treatment response. Among three TKI-naïve patients with pancreatic metastases were treated with lenvatinib, one patient died due to disease progression of other metastatic lesions although drug response of pancreas metastasis showed SD. The other two patients showed PR at the first response evaluation and maintained SD. During lenvatinib therapy, well-known AEs including hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue were observed. In addition, rare AEs associated with pancreatic tumor treatment including elevated pancreatic enzymes and blood glucose were observed in patients with pancreatic metastases, which were manageable with supportive care and insulin therapy. When TKI therapy is initiated for UMs in DTC patients, rare drug-related AEs should be considered.

The prognosis of thyroid cancer patients with UM has not been adequately evaluated, and the data reported have been inconsistent [34, 35]. In a systematic review of rare metastases in DTC patients, the mean OS of 94 patients from 77 studies was 60 months [12], similar to the mean OS observed in the present study (58.3 months). In a recent study, a high cancer-specific mortality of 58.3% was observed (21 of 36 patients) during the median follow-up period of 13 months after UM diagnosis, however, the study included 12 patients with UM to the brain, of whom 9 died [10]. The survival data of UM in DTC patients are discordant based on UM location and treatment modality. In a systematic review that included 16 patients in 15 studies, the mean OS was 37.6 months in DTC patients with pancreatic or hepatic metastases and who received surgical resection [11]. Predicting prognosis in patients with UM is difficult. In addition, the prognosis of UM is associated with disease status of primary thyroid cancer such as simultaneous distant metastases to other organs and RAI refractoriness. In the present study, almost all patients, except one patient with isolated UM to the infraspinatus muscle, showed other distant metastases. Six patients (31.6%) in our study died due to disease progression and all had solid organ UMs. Three patients with multiple distant metastases including two brain metastases with synchronous UMs died 6 months after the first diagnosis of advanced thyroid cancer.

The present study had several limitations due to the retrospective study design. Primary thyroid cancer TNM staging and pathologic diagnosis of UMs were not obtained in all cohort patients and BRAF mutation analyses on pathologic specimens were performed in only a few patients. Regular follow-up measurements of serum levels of Tg and imaging studies were not performed with the same time interval due to multi-center involvement.

Despite the limitations, our results demonstrate the clinical course of UMs in DTC patients including diagnostic methods and several management modalities. Early detection and TKI therapy for selected DTC patients with UM could improve clinical outcomes.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Schulumberger MJ. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(5):297–306. 10.1056/NEJM199801293380506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Links TP, van Tol KM, Jager PL, Plukker JT, Piers DA, Boezen HM, et al. Life expectancy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a novel approach to survival analysis. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12(2):273–80. 10.1677/erc.1.00892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Durante C, Haddy N, Baudin E, Leboulleux S, Hartl D, Travagli JP, et al. Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2892–9. 10.1210/jc.2005-2838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kitamura Y, Shimizu K, Nagahama M, Sugino K, Ozaki O, Mimura T, et al. Immediate causes of death in thyroid carcinoma: clinicopathological analysis of 161 fatal cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):4043–9. 10.1210/jcem.84.11.6115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schlumberger M, Brose M, Elisei R, Leboulleux S, Luster M, Pitoia F, et al. Definition and management of radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(5):356–8. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70215-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim H, Kim HI, Kim SW, Jung J, Jeon MJ, Kim WG, et al. Prognosis of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma with Initial Distant Metastasis: A Multicenter Study in Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(2):287–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruegemer JJ, Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Ryan JJ, Offord KP, Gorman CA. Distant metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(3):501–8. 10.1210/jcem-67-3-501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Busaidy NL, Cabanillas ME. Differentiated thyroid cancer: management of patients with radioiodine nonresponsive disease. J Thyroid Res. 2012;2012(doi):618985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Portela RA, Choby GW, Manni A, Campbell D, Crist H, Goldenberg D. Unusual sites of metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer: Case series and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2015;94(8):E43–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zunino A, Pitoia F, Faure E, Reyes A, Sala M, Sklate R, et al. Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma: analysis of 36 cases. Endocrine. 2019;65(3):630–6. 10.1007/s12020-019-01991-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Paspala A, Kostakis ID, Gaitanidis A, Prodromidou A, Schizas D, Machairas N. Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections for Metastases from Thyroid Cancer: a Systematic Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019;50(1):9–15. 10.1007/s12029-018-00196-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Madani A, Jozaghi Y, Tabah R, How J, Mitmaker E. Rare metastases of well-differentiated thyroid cancers: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):460–6. 10.1245/s10434-014-4058-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, Robinson B, Brose MS, Elisei R, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):621–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1406470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed New York: springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oh CM, Kong HJ, Kim EY, Kim HJ, Jung KW, Park SH et al. National Epidemiologic Survey of Thyroid Cancer (NEST) in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018052 10.4178/epih.e2018052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tunio MA, Alasiri M, Riaz K, Alshakwer W, Alarifi M. Skeletal Muscle Metastasis as an Initial Presentation of Follicualr Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2013; 192573 10.1155/2013/192573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee EK, Kim SM, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lim DJ, Kim MH, et al. Lesion-Based Evaluation Predicts Treatment Response to Lenvatinib for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Korean Multicenter Retrospective Study. Thyroid. 2019;29(12):1811–9. 10.1089/thy.2019.0022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meyer A, behrend M. Is pancreatic resection justified for metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer? Anticancer Res. 2006;26(3B):2269–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim SH, Brennan MF, Russo P, Burt ME, Coit DG. The role of surgery in the treatment of clinically isolated adrenal metastasis. Cancer. 1998;82(2):389–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Malhotra G, Upadhye TS, Sridhar E, Asopa RV, Garde PS, Gawde S, et al. Unusual case of adrenal and renal metastases from papillary carcinoma of thyroid. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35(9):731–6. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181ea342b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Song HJ, Xue YL, Qiu ZL, Luo QY. Uncommon metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Hell J of Nucl Med. 2012;15(3):233–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Segkos K, Schmidt C, Nabhan F. Isolated Liver Metastasis in Hürthle Cell Thyroid Cancer Treated with Microwave Ablation. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2017:4 pages. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wertenbroek MW, Links TP, Prins TR, Plukker JT, van der Jagt EJ, de Jong KP. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2008;18(10):1105–10. 10.1089/thy.2008.0080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Velasco A, Castillo O, Vidal I, Sánchez-Salas R, Campos R, Cabello R, et al. [Nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of small renal tumors. The role of radiofrequency]. Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62(1):49–55. 10.4321/s0004-06142009000100007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Siddiqui AA, Olansky L, Sawh RN, Tierney WM. Pancreatic metastasis of tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. JOP. 2006;7(4):417–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen L, Brainard JA. Pancreatic metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a case report. Acta Cytol. 2010;54(4):640–4. 10.1159/000325192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Djenic B, Duick D, Newell JO, Demeure MJ. Solitary liver metastasis from follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;6C:146–9. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.11.080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Angeles-Angeles A, Chable-Montero F, Martinez-Benitez B, Albores-Saavedra J. Unusual metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma: report of 2 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13(3):189–96. 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2008.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. 10.1089/thy.2015.0020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Farina E, Monari F, Tallini G, Repaci A, Mazzarotto R, Giunchi F, et al. Unusual Thyroid Carcinoma Metastases: a Case Series and Literature Review. Endocr Pathol. 2016;27(1):55–64. 10.1007/s12022-015-9410-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alzahrani AS, AlQaraawi A, Al Sohaibani F, Almanea H, Abalkhail H. Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy. Thyroid. 2012;22(5):536–41. 10.1089/thy.2011.0247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang J, Ma Y, Gong Y, Gong R, Li Z, Zhu J. Multiple Simultaneous Rare Distant Metastases as the Initial Presentation of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Herbowski L. Skeletal muscle metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas: An extensive review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7083–9. 10.3892/ol.2018.8216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davidson M, Olsen RJ, Ewton AA, Robbins RJ. Pancreas Metastases from Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Review of the Literature. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(12):1425–9. 10.4158/EP-2017-0001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Domenico Albano

15 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-13614

Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancers: A multicenter study in Korea

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 1 July. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Domenico Albano

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your manuscript you have stated that the study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating hospitals. Please include this information in the ethics statement on the online submission form.

3. In the ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study.

Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent.

If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

4. Please state the names of the four hospitals included in this study in the methods section of your main manuscript (currently this information is only found in your abstract).

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. One of the noted authors is a group: Korean Thyroid Cancer Study Group.

In addition to naming the author group, please list the individual authors and affiliations within this group in the acknowledgments section of your manuscript.

Please also indicate clearly a lead author for this group along with a contact email address.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear authors,

I suggest to revise the paper following reviewers suggestions

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Congratulations for presenting a very interesting paper concerning unusual metastases of differentiated thyroid cancers in Korea. The authors presented adequate methodology. The results were analyzed in details.

I have one notice. Though the authors used many abbreviations in Abstract (DTC,FDG, PET, CT, PTC, TKI, WBS, Tg) not necessarily obvious for all readers, however the use of an unknown shortcut “UMs” is unacceptable. All the more, descriptions for abbreviations should not be included here in Abstract. Explanations of abbreviations cannot be duplicated both in Abstract and Introduction section.

Reviewer #2: The present study highlights an important yet less reported and understood area of differentiated thyroid malignancies. This is in part due to rarity of such findings.

There are however, few area on which the authors can improve on their manuscript.

Methods:

Study design should be explicitly mentioned.

Similarly, study duration can be mentioned to enhance readers understanding on the data gathered.

Results:

Total number of thyroid patients screened can be added.

This can further lead to computation of the rate of UMs in their cohort.

Table 3 needs revision: Mortality was assessed in months/years?

Discussion:

There are a number of case series looking into unusual presentation of differentiated thyroid metastasis, they are basically, synchronous metastasis. Comparison with these studies could be helpful to improve on discussion.

This was a large multi-center study, addition of a comparison arm (usual distant metastasis to lung and bone) such as a case control study could add to the strength of the study.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0238207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238207.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Aug 2020

Response to Reviewer 1’s comment

Reviewer #1: Congratulations for presenting a very interesting paper concerning unusual metastases of differentiated thyroid cancers in Korea. The authors presented adequate methodology. The results were analyzed in details.

I have one notice. Though the authors used many abbreviations in Abstract (DTC,FDG, PET, CT, PTC, TKI, WBS, Tg) not necessarily obvious for all readers, however the use of an unknown shortcut “UMs” is unacceptable. All the more, descriptions for abbreviations should not be included here in Abstract. Explanations of abbreviations cannot be duplicated both in Abstract and Introduction section.

ANSWER:

Thank for your generous review and good comment. We agree with you that acronyms in the abstract detract from the readability of the paper, so we have deleted all abbreviations in the abstract to improve readability and to avoid duplication.(line 21,23,25,26,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,38,39,40,41,42,43,45,46,50,52).

Response to Reviewer 2’s comment

Reviewer #2: The present study highlights an important yet less reported and understood area of differentiated thyroid malignancies. This is in part due to rarity of such findings.

There are however, few area on which the authors can improve on their manuscript.

1. Methods:

Study design should be explicitly mentioned.

Similarly, study duration can be mentioned to enhance readers understanding on the data gathered.

ANSWER:

Thank for your meticulous review. We added more details of study design including the study duration. We screened medical records of DTC patients who had been treated between January 2000 and August 2016 from four tertiary hospitals in Korea and searched DTC patients with distant metastasis including usual (lung, bone, and brain) and unusual metastasis (UM). (line 78-82: We screened DTC patients who had been treated between January 2000 and August 2016 from four tertiary hospitals in Korea (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Busan National University Hospital, Severance Hospital) and retrospectively reviewed the medical records of DTC patients with distant metastasis. Distant metastases were divided to two groups; usual metastasis and UM.)

2. Results:

(1) Total number of thyroid patients screened can be added.

This can further lead to computation of the rate of UMs in their cohort.

ANSWER:

According to your recommendation, we have added the total number of DTC patient screened (n=38,772) and calculated the rate of UMs in our cohort. (line 117-119: Among investigated total of 38,772 DTC patients, 442 usual distant metastases (1.1%) in 392 patients (321 cases of lung metastases, 105 cases of bone metastases, and 16 cases of brain metastases) and 25 UMs (0.06%) in 19 patients were observed.)

Compared to other researcher’s reports, our data on distant metastasis seems to be rarer, so we added sentences to explain why distant metastasis is rarer in our cohort by citing Korea Central Cancer Registry data. (line 231-236: The National Epidemiologic Survey of Thyroid cancer (NEST) study based on the Korea Central Cancer Registry demonstrated 34 distant metastases (0.6%) among total 5,796 thyroid cancer patients during 10.6 years of follow-up (16). So, our data is in accordance with Korean nationwide data. The low incidence of distant metastases might by due to early surgery and high incidence of small papillary microcarcinoma in Korea.)

(2) Table 3 needs revision: Mortality was assessed in months/years?

ANSWER:

We presented the median follow-up duration from UM diagnosis (months)(IQR), however it is not easy to recognize. So, we changed it to Median follow-up months from UM diagnosis (IQR) (Table 3).

3. Discussion:

(1) There are a number of case series looking into unusual presentation of differentiated thyroid metastasis, they are basically, synchronous metastasis. Comparison with these studies could be helpful to improve on discussion.

ANSWER:

As you mentioned, there have been several case reports and series of UM in DTC patients which occurred synchronously. Even though direct comparison of synchronous and metachronous UMs in DTC patients is impossible due to the lack of basic data in previous studies, some of synchronous metastasis have been published as case reports showing the difficulty in finding the primary cancer focus. We added this point in line 237-239: Some case reports and series have shown that synchronous UM in DTC patients presenting initially with UM-related symptoms, but they have difficulty in finding the primary cancer origin due to unusual metastatic sites (17).

In previous studies (Zunino et al and Madani et al), the incidence of metachronous UMs were higher than those of synchronous UMs. This is the same point of view as our study. Long term follow-up due to relatively lower mortality of DTC patients give us more chance to find UMs from DTC. Additionally, high quality of imaging studies used in follow-up period recently increased the probability to discover UMs. Only 4 patients (21.1%) in our study had synchronous UM, indicating a higher incidence of UMs in advanced thyroid cancer during long-term follow-up with diverse imaging modalities such as PET-CT, 131I WBS, and CT scans due to a metachronous pattern.

(2) This was a large multi-center study, addition of a comparison arm (usual distant metastasis to lung and bone) such as a case control study could add to the strength of the study.

ANSWER:

We appreciate your kind and meaningful suggestion; however we are not able to do such a case-control study due to the limitations in the data set.

Decision Letter 1

Domenico Albano

12 Aug 2020

Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancers: A multicenter study in Korea

PONE-D-20-13614R1

Dear Dr. Kang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Domenico Albano

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for carefully analyzing all comments and making appropriate corrections to the manuscript. Indeed, ther is a clear flow reading your manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Domenico Albano

14 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-13614R1

Unusual metastases from differentiated thyroid cancers: A multicenter study in Korea

Dear Dr. Kang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Domenico Albano

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES