Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
letter
. 2020 Jul 8;127(6):849–850. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317025

Tamoxifen-Activated CreERT Impairs Retinal Angiogenesis Independently of Gene Deletion

James T Brash 1, Rebecca L Bolton 1, Victoria S Rashbrook 1, Laura Denti 1, Yoshiaki Kubota 2, Christiana Ruhrberg 1,
PMCID: PMC7447161  PMID: 32635822

Meet the First Author, see p 706

The perinatal mouse retina is the current model of choice to define the mechanisms of sprouting angiogenesis.1 After birth, blood vessels grow from the optic nerve head towards the retinal periphery while branching laterally to establish a planar network that is exquisitely suited for quantifying vascular extension and branching.1 Cre recombinase–mediated ablation of loxP-flanked (floxed) genes is widely used to uncover angiogenesis genes in the mouse retina, with temporal control available through the Cre recombinase estrogen fusion protein with ligand binding mutation (CreER), whose activity is tamoxifen-dependent.2,3 The correct interpretation of experiments employing CreER-mediated gene ablation requires controls to exclude off-target effects, such as transgene insertion into essential genomic loci or toxic effects of activating CreER. Despite reports of impaired cell proliferation and DNA damage in several cell types after CreER activation,4 published work has not addressed whether CreER toxicity affects the endothelial cells that line all blood vessels and drive angiogenesis.

We have compared retinal angiogenesis in littermate perinatal day 7 pups expressing or lacking the endothelial cell–selective Cdh5-CreERT2 transgene with the Mouse Genome Informatics identifier 5705396.5 Mice were injected at perinatal day 2 and 4 with peanut oil or peanut oil containing tamoxifen doses representative of those commonly reported.3 Neither CreERT2 nor tamoxifen alone impaired vascular network extension or branch density (Figure [A] and [B]). In contrast, and despite the absence of floxed target genes, both vascular parameters were significantly reduced in the retinas of tamoxifen-injected pups expressing CreERT2 compared with tamoxifen-injected pups lacking CreERT2 (Figure [A] and [B]; similar defects were seen with the tamoxifen metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen; data not shown). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant, negative relationship of both vascular parameters with tamoxifen dose in Cdh5-CreERT2 mice (Figure [A] and [B]; extension: regression coefficient, −0.00095, R2=0.46, P=1.69×10−5; branch density: regression coefficient, −0.0026, R2=0.54, P=1.69×10−6). Vascular network extension and branch density were also significantly reduced in the retinas of tamoxifen-injected pups carrying the tamoxifen-inducible, endothelial cell–selective Pdgfb-iCreERT2 transgene (Mouse Genome Informatics identifier 37938525; Figure [C] and [D]). The bodyweight of CreERT2 mice was not reduced compared to CreERT2-deficient littermates, excluding that a general developmental delay had impeded angiogenesis (data not shown). We conclude that tamoxifen-activated CreERT2 compromises retinal angiogenesis. In contrast, Tie2-Cre, which is constitutively expressed in endothelial cells (Mouse Genome Informatics identifier 2450311),5 did not impair retinal angiogenesis (Figure [C] and [D]), although this does not exclude toxicity of constitutive Cre activity in other circumstances.

Figure.

Figure.

Endothelial Cre recombinase estrogen fusion protein with ligand binding mutation (CreER)T2 activity impairs retinal angiogenesis. Flat mounted perinatal day (P) 7 retinas were stained with the vascular endothelial marker IB4 (isolectin B4) and fluorescent streptavidin.3 Scale bars: 500 µm. A and B, Cdh5-CreERT2–expressing and wildtype littermates were injected at P2 and P4 with 25 µL peanut oil containing 0, 50, 100, or 150 µg tamoxifen. A, Micrographs and (B) quantification of vascular extension and branch density. Dotted boxes indicate areas shown at higher magnification. Red and yellow lines indicate vascular extension and retinal radius. The green box indicates a representative area analyzed for vascular branch density. C and D, Pdgfb-iCreERT2–expressing and wildtype littermates were injected at P2 and P4 with 25 µL peanut oil containing 100 µg tamoxifen. Tie2-Cre litters were not injected. C, Micrographs and (D) quantification of vascular extension and branch density. Data are presented as mean±SD fold change relative to littermate controls; each data point represents the average of several retinal leaflets. Cdh5-CreERT2 experiments: controls n=5 (0 µg), n=5 (50 µg), n=10 (100 µg), n=7 (150 µg); CreERT2 n=5 (0 µg), n=4 (50 µg), n=13 (100 µg), n=9 (150 µg); Pdgfb-iCreERT2 experiments: controls n=5, CreERT2 n=7; Tie2-Cre experiments: controls n=5, Tie2-Cre n=3. Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test, nonsignificant (ns), P>0.05; *P<0.05; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Our findings imply that CreER toxicity has likely confounded the interpretation of some prior retinal angiogenesis studies, including our own, because they have compared tamoxifen-injected CreER-expressing pups to treatment-naive or tamoxifen-injected CreER-negative littermates. As CreER-mediated gene targeting remains a key method for angiogenesis research, we propose that future retinal studies should include tamoxifen-injected CreER control mice lacking floxed genes. Moreover, potential CreER toxicity should be considered when studying angiogenesis in other organs.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/16/61/32740, FS/18/65/34186, PG/19/37/3439) and Wellcome (205099/Z/16/Z). This study used mice on a C57/Bl6J background and was approved by the local Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body and the UK Home Office. The authors declare that data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

CreER
Cre recombinase estrogen fusion protein with ligand binding mutation
*

J.T.B. and R.L.B. contributed equally to this article.

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 850.

References

  • 1.Ruhrberg C, Bautch VL. Neurovascular development and links to disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013701675–1684doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1277-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997237752–757doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pitulescu ME, Schmidt I, Benedito R, Adams RH. Inducible gene targeting in the neonatal vasculature and analysis of retinal angiogenesis in mice. Nat Protoc 201051518–1534doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loonstra A, Vooijs M, Beverloo HB, Allak BA, van Drunen E, Kanaar R, Berns A, Jonkers J. Growth inhibition and DNA damage induced by Cre recombinase in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001989209–9214doi: 10.1073/pnas.161269798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Payne S, De Val S, Neal A. Endothelial-specific Cre mouse models. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2018382550–2561doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.309669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Circulation Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES