Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Objective:
Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies has demonstrated that myocardial infarction promotes atherosclerosis progression. The impact of focal vascular inflammation on the progression and phenotype of remote atherosclerosis remains unknown.
Approach and Results:
We used a novel ApoE−/− knockout mouse model of sustained arterial inflammation, initiated by mechanical injury in the abdominal aorta. Using serial in vivo molecular MRI and ex vivo histology and flow cytometry, we demonstrate that focal arterial inflammation triggered by aortic injury, accelerates atherosclerosis in the remote brachiocephalic artery. The brachiocephalic artery atheroma had distinct histological features including increased plaque size, plaque permeability, necrotic core to collagen ratio, infiltration of more inflammatory monocyte subsets, and reduced collagen content. We also found that arterial inflammation following focal vascular injury evoked a prolonged systemic inflammatory response manifested as a persistent increase in serum IL-6 (interleukin 6). Finally, we demonstrate that 2 therapeutic interventions—pravastatin and minocycline—had distinct anti-inflammatory effects at the plaque and systemic level.
Conclusions:
We show for the first time that focal arterial inflammation in response to vascular injury enhances systemic vascular inflammation, accelerates remote atheroma progression and induces plaques more inflamed, lipid-rich, and collagen-poor in the absence of ischemic myocardial injury. This inflammatory cascade is modulated by pravastatin and minocycline treatments, which have anti-inflammatory effects at both plaque and systemic levels that mitigate atheroma progression.
Highlights.
Sustained aortic inflammation, triggered by focal aortic injury, resulted in the formation of larger and more permeable remote atheroma with higher inflammatory cell count, larger necrotic core, and reduced collagen content.
Sustained aortic inflammation, triggered by focal aortic injury, has systemic ripple effects that promote more advanced remote atheroma via an acute increase of blood inflammatory monocytes, 24 hours following injury, and persistent elevation of serum interleukin IL (interleukin)-6 for up to 3 months following injury.
Pravastatin and minocycline treatments decrease plaque burden, endothelial permeability, and monocyte count and increase collagen in the remote atheroma. Each treatment had distinct effects on circulating IL-6 and monocytes.
Clinical and experimental data have established both systemic and arterial inflammation as drivers for the progression, destabilization, and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques leading to subsequent cardiovascular events.1–5 Recent results from the PESA study (Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis) demonstrated the presence of arterial inflammation even in plaque-free segments, suggesting that active arterial inflammation may precede the development of atherosclerosis.6 Importantly, arterial inflammation is not limited to a single vascular territory but is widespread,7,8 leading to the formation of multiple complex coronary plaques9 and fissures10 in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Considerable evidence also supports the role of systemic inflammation, immunity, or infection in potentiating atherosclerosis and augmenting cardiovascular risk.1 Advances in the understanding of the pathways of systemic inflammation and immunity have provided mechanistic insights that connect traditional cardiovascular risk factors to vascular pathophysiology and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques, which is often observed in multiple vascular segments within the same patient.1,11 Consequently, biomarkers of inflammation (eg, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]) have improved the prediction of incident and recurrent cardiovascular events12–14 and can help guide administration of anti-lipid12 and anti-inflammatory therapies.12,15,16 The seminal CANTOS study (Canakinumab Antiinflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study) recently established that direct anti-inflammatory treatment alleviates the residual inflammatory burden of recurrent cardiovascular events and ultimately improves outcomes in patients with a prior myocardial infarction.15,16
Mechanistic studies in mice revealed that myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis via a neuroimmune axis3 and endothelial cell activation.4 Moreover, the severity of the focal arterial inflammatory response following angioplasty in humans and the extent of mechanical arterial injury in animal models was shown to correlate with the severity of restenosis and neointima hyperplasia.17–23 However, whether local vascular inflammation (initiated by focal arterial injury) is sufficient to accelerate remote atherosclerosis and induce changes in plaque phenotype in the absence of myocardial necrosis or ischemic injury, is yet to be elucidated.
In this study, we hypothesize that sustained vascular inflammation in one arterial segment following focal mechanical injury can exacerbate the progression and composition of atheroma remote to the site of injury. Such vascular-to-vascular effects might involve systemic responses that are amenable to therapeutic intervention. We used a novel mouse model of sustained vascular inflammation in the abdominal aorta and performed serial molecular and functional in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to ex vivo experiments to (1) investigate the effects of sustained focal vascular inflammation of the aorta on the size, composition, endothelial function, and permeability of remote atheroma; (2) elucidate the potential systemic inflammatory mechanisms involved in this response; and (3) investigate whether pravastatin and minocycline treatment can mitigate the effects of sustained vascular inflammation on the size and composition of the remote atheroma.
Methods
Data will be available on request from the authors. This study was performed only with males, as it is well known that plaques develop more reproducibly and with less biological variability.24,25 Male apolipoprotein knockout mice (ApoE−/−) at 8 to 10 weeks (n=78) of age were divided into 5 groups: (1) baseline/control group: ApoE−/− mice (n=10) were fed a normal laboratory diet for 12 weeks; (2) high-fat diet (HFD) group: ApoE−/− mice (n=24) were fed a HFD for 12 weeks containing 21% fat from lard and 0.15% (wt/wt) cholesterol (Special Diet Services, United Kingdom); (3) HFD+injury group: ApoE−/− mice (n=24) underwent aortic injury of the abdominal aorta as previously described17,26 (Figure I in the Data Supplement) and switched to HFD for 12 weeks the following day; (4) HFD+injury+Prav group: ApoE−/− mice (n=10) underwent aortic injury, followed by HFD for 12 weeks and pravastatin treatment administered in drinking water (40 mg/kg per day; Kemprotec Limited, United Kingdom) the following day; (5) HFD+injury+Mino group: ApoE−/− mice (n=10) underwent aortic injury, followed by HFD for 12 weeks and minocycline treatment (an antibiotic with proven anti-inflammatory properties)27–29 administered in drinking water (3 mg/kg per day, Mylan, United Kingdom) on the following day. The HFD and HFD+injury groups were longitudinally scanned at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after commencement of the experiment to evaluate disease progression. The treatment groups were only assessed at the 12-week time point to evaluate treatment efficacy. The in vivo MRI experiment consisted of 2 MRI sessions separated by 24 hours. During the first session, the abdominal aorta and the brachiocephalic artery (BCA) were imaged 30 minutes after intravenous administration of gadolinium (Gd)-albumin (Ablavar, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica). During the second imaging session, the same vascular segments were imaged, 2 hours after intravenous administration of Gd-elastin (ESMA, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica). Following the last imaging session at 12 weeks, tissue, blood, and serum were collected from the animals that underwent MRI plus additional mice per group for ex vivo analysis using histology, flow cytometry, and Luminex assay. In addition, blood was collected from animals at the acute phase following vascular injury (1, 2, and 7 days) to assess the systemic inflammatory response by measuring different cytokines and monocytes. All procedures used in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the UK Home Office. Multiple-group comparisons of continuous variables were performed with a Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test and a Dunn post hoc test (% change of vascular permeability in the aorta and BCA and % change of elastin remodeling and plaque burden in the aorta and BCA, respectively). Correlation analysis was performed with a Spearman test. GraphPad Prism 5.00 (San Diego) was used for the statistical analysis. The data are presented as the media±SEM and P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Detailed methods and power of calculation analysis are described in the material and Figure II in the Data Supplement.
Results
Sustained Arterial Inflammation Accelerates Atherosclerosis in a Remote Artery
We investigated whether focal vascular injury and subsequent vascular inflammation in the abdominal aorta affects atherosclerosis progression in a remote arterial segment in vivo. For this reason, HFD-fed ApoE−/− mice undergoing abdominal aortic injury,17,26 which triggers persistent aortic inflammation (Figure III in the Data Supplement), were used to investigate atherosclerosis progression in the BCA (Figure 1A). For serial and comprehensive assessment of changes in vascular pathology at different time points following aortic injury, in vivo MRI with albumin (Gd-albumin) and elastin (Gd-elastin) binding contrast agents that have been validated to measure endothelial permeability26,30–33 and plaque burden and remodeling,34,35 respectively, were performed (Figure II in the Data Supplement). We found higher vascular permeability (Figure 1B and 1C) and elastin remodeling (Figure 1D and 1E) in the aorta of mice subjected to aortic injury compared with uninjured mice as observed by MRI. In addition, we found that in animals with aortic injury, plaque permeability (Figure 1F and 1G), and plaque burden (Figure 1H and 1I) were consistently increased in the BCA compared with uninjured animals, suggesting that the presence of a focal vascular insult accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in a remote arterial segment. While we found that plaque permeability in the BCA was significantly higher from 8 weeks onwards following injury compared with uninjured mice (Figure 1F and 1G), plaque burden was significantly higher at 12 weeks, suggesting that changes in plaque permeability precede changes in plaque burden (Figure 1H and 1I). This may suggest a different plaque progression profile in different arterial segments. Functional measurements of endothelial-dependent vasodilation, in response to acetylcholine, showed endothelial dysfunction and paradoxical vasoconstriction30,36 in both the injured and uninjured HFD-fed mice at 12 weeks compared with control mice fed a normal laboratory diet as quantified by MRI (Figure IV in the Data Supplement).
Persistent Vascular Inflammation Promotes Formation of Plaques That Are More Inflamed, Lipid-Rich, and Collagen-Poor in a Remote Arterial Segment
To investigate whether arterial inflammation affects atherosclerotic plaque phenotype in remote arteries, we next assessed the compositional characteristics of plaques ex vivo (Figure 2A). We found that BCA atheroma of injured mice had distinct histological features including increased plaque area (Figure 2B), reduced collagen content (Figure 2C), and increased endothelial permeability (% albumin; Figure 2F), compared with uninjured mice. No change in the necrotic core area was found between the 2 groups (Figure 2D). However, the ratio of the necrotic core to collagen was higher in injured mice compared with uninjured mice (Figure 2E). We also found that monocyte infiltration was higher in the BCA of injured compared with uninjured mice (Figure 2G and 2H) whereas no differences in the ratio of tissue Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo monocyte subsets were detected between groups (Figure 2I). Importantly, we found that the amount of Ly6Chi monocytes infiltrating the aortic wall, at the site of injury, correlated with the amount of Ly6Chi infiltration in the remote BCA at 12 weeks. This result suggests that the extent of monocyte-related vascular inflammation, as a result of focal aortic injury, correlates with the monocyte inflammatory burden in the remote artery at 12 weeks (Figure 2J). There were no significant differences between neutrophils, B cells, and T-cell count in the BCA between the 2 groups at 12 weeks (Figure V in the Data Supplement).
Finally, to evaluate the impact of sustained aortic inflammation on plaque progression in other remote arterial segments, we measured plaque burden in the aortic root and the aortic arch. Similar to the changes observed in the BCA, plaque burden in the aortic root was higher in injured animals compared with noninjured mice at 12 weeks (Figure 3A). Interestingly, differences in plaque burden located in the aortic arch were observed earlier. Injured animals had higher plaque burden in the aortic arch starting from 8 weeks onwards compared with noninjured animals (Figure 3B and 3C).
Sustained Focal Arterial Inflammation Causes a Persistent Increase of the Circulating Inflammatory Cytokine IL-6
To investigate whether focal aortic injury affects the inflammatory response at a systemic level, we measured the expression of inflammatory cytokines in serum. We found that IL-6 (interleukin 6) was increased 7-fold in the acute phase (24–48 hours) following aortic injury (Figure 4A) and remained significantly elevated (2.5-fold) up to 12 weeks (Figure 4B). The serum inflammatory markers IL-1β, GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor), IL-5, CCL-2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2), TNFα (tumor necrosis factor alpha), INFγ (interferon gamma), and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) were below detectability in this murine model. We next evaluated blood monocytes in the acute phase (24 hours and 7 days) and at 12 weeks following injury. A significant increase in circulating monocytes was detected 24 hours after focal aortic injury compared with uninjured mice. However, at later time points no differences were detected between the 2 groups (Figure 4C), both demonstrating monocytosis and promotion of the Ly6Chi subset due to HFD that has previously been reported.37 Despite the increased monocyte-related vascular infiltration, at both the site of injury in the abdominal aorta (Figure III in the Data Supplement) and in the remote BCA (Figure 2H), blood monocytes and the percentage of monocyte subsets were similar between injured and uninjured mice (Figure 4C and 4D). The number of circulating neutrophils, B cells, and T cells was similar between the 2 groups at 12 weeks (Figure VI in the Data Supplement).
Pravastatin and Minocycline Treatments Mitigate the Effects of Sustained Aortic Inflammation on the Progression of Remote Atheroma
We next investigated if pravastatin, an established therapeutic for atherosclerosis-related diseases and minocycline, an antibiotic treatment with anti-inflammatory properties, could modulate the effects of vascular inflammation, initiated by aortic injury, on plaque progression in the remote artery. To this end, injured mice were treated with either pravastatin or minocycline (Figure II in the Data Supplement) following aortic injury. In vivo MRI at 12 weeks showed that both treatments mitigated the effects of arterial inflammation in the remote artery as demonstrated by reductions in plaque permeability (Figure 5A and 5B) and plaque burden (Figure 5C and 5D) compared with the untreated group. Similar results were obtained when the plaque burden in the aortic root and the aortic arch were analyzed (Figure VII in the Data Supplement). However, only pravastatin treatment improved endothelial-dependent vasodilation, in response to acetylcholine, in the remote artery compared with untreated mice (Figure 5E and 5F).
To explore the mechanisms by which pravastatin and minocycline treatment impact plaque progression and phenotype in this model, we quantified serum IL-6, blood monocytes, and plaque morphology in the BCA. Pravastatin treatment decreased serum IL-6 (Figure 6A) but did not affect systemic blood monocyte numbers (Figure 6B) and subsets (Figure 6C). However, pravastatin treatment had marked lesion-level effects with significantly reduced plaque size (Figure 6D and 6E), necrotic core size (Figure 6G), necrotic core to collagen ratio (Figure 6H), plaque permeability (Figure 6I), and plaque monocyte infiltration (Figure 6J) compared with untreated mice. Concomitantly, pravastatin treatment significantly increased collagen content (Figure 6F), an established index of plaque stabilization.
Similar to pravastatin, minocycline treatment decreased serum IL-6 (Figure 6A). However, minocycline treatment also reduced monocytes (Figure 6B) and increased the Ly6Clo subset in blood (Figure 6C). Despite the additional impact of minocycline on circulating monocyte numbers and phenotype, minocycline had a smaller impact on remote plaque morphology compared with pravastatin, although minocycline treatment still reduced plaque size (Figure 6D and 6E), necrotic core to collagen ratio (Figure 6H), plaque permeability (Figure 6I), and plaque monocyte infiltration (Figure 6J) with a small increase in collagen content (Figure 6F) compared with untreated mice. No effect was detected on necrotic core size (Figure 6H). Only minocycline treatment resulted in higher numbers of the Ly6Clo monocytes (Figure 6K) within BCA plaque. Overall, these results suggest that both treatments have a beneficial effect in halting plaque progression but likely through different biological pathways.
Discussion
There is growing evidence to support a central role of systemic inflammation in atherosclerosis progression, with ischemic events exacerbating vascular inflammation-promoting faster plaque growth at a distance. However, whether sustained arterial inflammation is sufficient to cause progression of remote atheroma and modulate plaque characteristics has not been investigated. Using a novel mouse model, this study was the first to reveal the vascular-to-vascular effects of sustained arterial inflammation in the abdominal aorta on the progression and composition of atheroma in a remote arterial segment, the BCA in mice (Figure 7). Molecular and functional MRI, flow cytometry, histology, and Luminex assays revealed that (1) sustained aortic inflammation resulted in the formation of larger and more permeable remote atheroma with higher inflammatory cell count, increased necrotic core, and reduced collagen content; (2) sustained aortic inflammation, triggered by focal aortic injury, has systemic ripple effects triggering more advanced remote atheroma possibly via persistent increased levels of serum IL-6 and increased blood inflammatory monocytes; (3) 2 therapeutic interventions, pravastatin and minocycline, have differential effects on the remote atheroma. Both treatments decreased plaque burden, permeability, and monocyte component and increased collagen in the remote atheroma and alters systemic inflammatory markers including IL-6 and blood monocytes, although to different degrees.
To test the hypothesis that sustained aortic inflammation, in response to focal vascular injury, modulates distant atherosclerotic disease, we serially imaged mice using MRI. Our experimental design enabled noninvasive and direct monitoring of disease progression and response to treatment in multiple arterial segments in vivo. Using molecular and functional MRI, we found that sustained aortic inflammation increased both the permeability and size of the remote atheroma. Interestingly, endothelial function at the site of the remote atheroma was equally decreased in HFD-fed and HFD plus injury mice, suggesting that the additional vascular effect of focal injury did not further impair remote endothelial function. Plaque permeability and endothelial dysfunction are important for initiation and progression of atherosclerosis38 and precede plaque rupture and development of cardiovascular events.38–41 We and others have demonstrated the utility of molecular MRI to assess atherosclerotic plaque burden.34,35,42–44 Importantly, our longitudinal MRI experimental design and the use of 2 contrast agents that measure different biological features of the plaque showed that increased vascular permeability precedes plaque growth; providing further in vivo mechanistic insights about the process of disease progression that was previously only shown in a limited number of studies.45–48 Finally, molecular MRI allowed for monitoring the therapeutic effects of pravastatin and minocycline. Both treatments decreased plaque permeability and size of the remote atheroma, as previously reported.30,34 However, only pravastatin improved endothelial function, as previously reported.30
Detailed ex vivo characterization of the BCA atheroma revealed that sustained aortic inflammation, not only increased remote plaque permeability and size, but also resulted in increased necrotic core to collagen ratio, increased inflammatory monocyte subsets, and reduced plaque collagen. These results are consistent with previous preclinical studies where a preexisting underlying proinflammatory cardiovascular insult, for example, acute myocardial infarction and necrosis, leads to accelerated atherosclerosis due to sympathetically driven systemic inflammation3 and upregulation of inflammatory adhesion molecules on the plaque surface.4 In line with our work, clinical studies have demonstrated the association between plaques and their complexities in different vascular segments in patients with and without myocardial infarction49 and the possible role of local and systemic inflammation on plaque instability.11,15 However, the propagation of vascular inflammation, downstream impact on atheroma progression, and mechanisms underlying this interaction remain obscure.
To assess possible mechanisms by which aortic injury affects the composition of remote atheroma, we investigated the systemic inflammatory response. Unlike in myocardial infarction models, our model showed persistent vascular inflammation up to 12 weeks following aortic injury, characterized by increased monocyte infiltration at the site of injury and at the remote atheroma with an associated increase in systemic inflammatory blood monocytes and serum IL-6, that could contribute to both, the development of focal vascular remodeling and remote atherosclerosis progression. Several studies have shown that IL-6 exerts a broad range of biological roles by promoting a proinflammatory response and regulating cholesterol homeostasis.38,50 Moreover, serum IL-6 levels have been shown to strongly associate with atherothrombosis and future vascular events, independent of traditional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease.51 Modulation of systemic IL-6 by Canakinumab reduced or prevented atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular events, as shown in the CANTOS study.15,16 Importantly, several studies have demonstrated an impact of IL-6 on atherosclerosis via numerous mechanisms including chemotactic of monocytes and activation of endothelial cells with subsequent production of chemokines and adhesion molecules,50 which correlates with fatty streak formation.52 However, other studies have shown that knock-down of IL-6 in ApoE−/− mice, exacerbates atherosclerosis and decreases leukocyte homing,53,54 which could be related to the IL-6-dependent regulation of lipid metabolism. In this context, IL-6 can act in an atheroprotective manner by increasing cholesterol efflux to apoA1 (apolipoprotein A1) in macrophages by upregulating ABC (ATP-binding cassette transporter) A1.55 In addition, high IL-6 levels have been associated with low HDL (high-density lipoproteins), which is involved in cholesterol transport back to the circulating blood, anti-thrombotic actions, dampening inflammation, and lowering oxidative stress.56,57 Therefore, we speculate that sustained increased in serum IL-6 observed in the injured animals in our study contributes to the propagation of vascular inflammation and infiltration of monocytes at the site of injury and subsequently in the remote atheroma. However, additional experiments, for example, using ApoE−/−/IL-6 animals or downregulation of the IL-6 using miRNAs or antibodies are needed to elucidate which cells produce IL-6, and whether the effects of IL-6 are causal.
Finally, we evaluated the systemic and lesion-level effects of 2 pharmacological interventions, pravastatin and minocycline. Our data demonstrated that pravastatin treatment in animals with sustained arterial inflammation improved both anatomic and functional metrics of the remote atheroma. Specifically, pravastatin treatment reduced plaque permeability, burden, necrotic core, and monocyte infiltration; increased collagen and improved endothelial function in the remote atheroma. At the systemic level, pravastatin treatment reduced serum IL-6, but surprisingly had no impact on the number or phenotype of circulating monocytes. It is well established that treatment with statins have unequivocal benefits in reducing the rate of plaque progression and cardiovascular events and changing plaque composition in both, animal models30,58,59 and patients with coronary artery disease.60 We and others have previously shown the beneficial effects of pravastatin treatment in reducing vascular permeability, plaque burden, and improving endothelial function in both mice30,34 and humans.61 In addition, a recent study has shown that intravenous administration of atorvastatin during myocardial infarction limits cardiac damage, improves cardiac function, and mitigates remodeling to a larger extent than when administered orally shortly after reperfusion.62 In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the beneficial impact of statin treatment in mitigating the vascular-to-vascular effects of sustained aortic inflammation. Our data are also in agreement with studies showing that pravastatin promotes plaque stabilization by increasing the collagen content and reducing inflammation, in a dose-dependent manner, reducing plaque lipids, metalloproteinases, and cellular death in different vascular segments in both patients60,63 and animals.59,64
Treatment with minocycline, a tetracycline derived antibiotic, reduced plaque permeability, burden, necrotic core to collagen ratio, monocyte infiltration and increased collagen, but did not improve endothelial-dependent vasodilation. Unlike pravastatin, minocycline had a marked effect on both, tissue and systemic inflammation. Minocycline treatment caused a reduction in both circulating and lesion monocyte content with a shift towards more reparative Ly6Clo monocyte subsets, in addition to a decrease serum IL-6 levels. Previous preclinical studies have shown that treatment with minocycline, caused a reduction in plaque progression and promoted stabilization of plaques by inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, reducing plaque MMP (matrix metallopeptidases) activity,27–29 and reducing vascular permeability29 in models of atherosclerosis. Our finding that minocycline affects monocyte polarization is novel and has not been previously reported. Previous studies only showed that minocycline inhibited microglia polarization to a proinflammatory state in murine models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.65 Additional experiments are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms by which minocycline modulates monocyte polarization. Our finding that minocycline reduces circulating levels of IL-6 is consistent with previous work showing that minocycline treatment supresses IL-6 expression in ovarian cancer cells66 and in the central nervous system, acting as a neuroprotective agent.67,68 However, future studies are needed to elucidate the molecular pathways by which minocycline decreases IL-6 expression.
There is a limitation associated with the current study. Quantification of the re-endothelialization process in the injured abdominal aorta at different time points for this animal model has not been performed. CD31 immunohistochemistry or even high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images would have provided important information about this process and will be evaluated in our future studies.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that a single mechanical injury in the aorta results in sustained aortic inflammation and is sufficient to exert remote vascular-to-vascular effects that accelerate remote atheroma formation leading to plaques that are more inflamed, lipid-rich and collagen-poor, in the absence of tissue necrosis or myocardial infarction. This may involve systemic ripple effects of vascular inflammation via elevated levels of circulating IL-6 and inflammatory blood monocytes. The vascular-to-vascular effects can be inhibited by pravastatin or minocycline treatments, which reduce IL-6 but have distinct effects on circulating monocytes. These results provide possible mechanistic insights into the higher incidence of remote atherothrombotic complications following an index cardiovascular event and of potential therapeutic targets to mitigate disease progression.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prakash Saha, Richard Beatson and Sean O’Farrell for providing experimental advice on different aspects of this work and David Onthank (Lantheus Medical Imaging) for providing Gd-ESMA.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by the following grants: (1) Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P032311/1, EP/P001009/1 and EP/P007619/1, (2) British Heart Foundation (BHF) programme grant RG/20/1/34802, (3) King’s BHF Centre for Research Excellence RE/18/2/34213 (4) Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering (NS/A000049/1), (5) FONDECYT 1180525, and (6) the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cardiovascular Health Technology Cooperative (HTC) and comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre awarded to Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London and King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust.
Disclosures
None.
Supplementary Material
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- ABC
- ATP-binding cassette transporter
- apoA1
- apolipoprotein A1
- BCA
- brachiocephalic artery
- Gd
- gadolinium
- HFD
- hig-fat diet
- hsCRP
- high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
- IL-6
- interleukin 6
- MRI
- magnetic resonance imaging
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 2168.
The Data Supplement is available with this article at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314387.
References
- 1.Libby P, Loscalzo J, Ridker PM, Farkouh ME, Hsue PY, Fuster V, Hasan AA, Amar S. Inflammation, immunity, and infection in atherothrombosis: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018722071–2081doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, et al. ; PROSPECT Investigators A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011364226–235doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dutta P, Courties G, Wei Y, Leuschner F, Gorbatov R, Robbins CS, Iwamoto Y, Thompson B, Carlson AL, Heidt T, et al. Myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature 2012487325–329doi: 10.1038/nature11260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moccetti F, Brown E, Xie A, Packwood W, Qi Y, Ruggeri Z, Shentu W, Chen J, López JA, Lindner JR. Myocardial infarction produces sustained proinflammatory endothelial activation in remote arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018721015–1026doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Musher DM, Abers MS, Corrales-Medina VF. Acute infection and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2019380171–176doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1808137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fernández-Friera L, Fuster V, López-Melgar B, Oliva B, Sánchez-González J, Macías A, Pérez-Asenjo B, Zamudio D, Alonso-Farto JC, España S, et al. Vascular inflammation in subclinical atherosclerosis detected by hybrid PET/MRI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019731371–1382doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Spagnoli LG, Bonanno E, Mauriello A, Palmieri G, Partenzi A, Sangiorgi G, Crea F. Multicentric inflammation in epicardial coronary arteries of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002401579–1588doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02376-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oikonomou EK, Marwan M, Desai MY, Mancio J, Alashi A, Hutt Centeno E, Thomas S, Herdman L, Kotanidis CP, Thomas KE, et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data. Lancet 2018392929–939doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31114-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, Pica M, Shoukfeh M, O’Neill WW. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000343915–922doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rothwell PM, Villagra R, Gibson R, Donders RC, Warlow CP. Evidence of a chronic systemic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet 200035519–24doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04470-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lombardo A, Biasucci LM, Lanza GA, Coli S, Silvestri P, Cianflone D, Liuzzo G, Burzotta F, Crea F, Maseri A. Inflammation as a possible link between coronary and carotid plaque instability. Circulation 20041093158–3163doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130786.28008.56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM, Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, et al. ; JUPITER Study Group Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 20083592195–2207doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cook NR, Paynter NP, Eaton CB, Manson JE, Martin LW, Robinson JG, Rossouw JE, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Ridker PM. Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds Risk scores for global cardiovascular risk prediction in the multiethnic Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation 20121251748–56, S1doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.075929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ridker PM. A test in context: high-sensitivity c-reactive protein. J Am Coll Cardiol 201667712–723doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Nicolau J, Koenig W, Anker SD, et al. ; CANTOS Trial Group Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med 20173771119–1131doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ridker PM, Libby P, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Koenig W, Shimokawa H, Everett BM, Glynn RJ. Modulation of the interleukin-6 signalling pathway and incidence rates of atherosclerotic events and all-cause mortality: analyses from the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS). Eur Heart J 2018393499–3507doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lavin B, Gómez M, Pello OM, Castejon B, Piedras MJ, Saura M, Zaragoza C. Nitric oxide prevents aortic neointimal hyperplasia by controlling macrophage polarization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014341739–1746doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Danenberg HD, Welt FG, Walker M, III, Seifert P, Toegel GS, Edelman ER. Systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide increases neointimal formation after balloon and stent injury in rabbits. Circulation 20021052917–2922doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000018168.15904.bb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jawien A, Bowen-Pope DF, Lindner V, Schwartz SM, Clowes AW. Platelet-derived growth factor promotes smooth muscle migration and intimal thickening in a rat model of balloon angioplasty. J Clin Invest 199289507–511doi: 10.1172/JCI115613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bendeck MP, Zempo N, Clowes AW, Galardy RE, Reidy MA. Smooth muscle cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase expression after arterial injury in the rat. Circ Res 199475539–545doi: 10.1161/01.res.75.3.539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Libby P, Schwartz D, Brogi E, Tanaka H, Clinton SK. A cascade model for restenosis. A special case of atherosclerosis progression. Circulation 199286III47–52 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pietersma A, Kofflard M, de Wit LE, Stijnen T, Koster JF, Serruys PW, Sluiter W. Late lumen loss after coronary angioplasty is associated with the activation status of circulating phagocytes before treatment. Circulation 1995911320–1325doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.5.1320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moreno PR, Bernardi VH, López-Cuéllar J, Newell JB, McMellon C, Gold HK, Palacios IF, Fuster V, Fallon JT. Macrophage infiltration predicts restenosis after coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina. Circulation 1996943098–3102doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu M, Zhang W, Li X, Han J, Chen Y, Duan Y. Impact of age and sex on the development of atherosclerosis and expression of the related genes in apoE deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016469456–462doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang G, Li C, Zhu N, Chen Y, Yu Q, Liu E, Wang R. Sex differences in the formation of atherosclerosis lesion in apoE-/-mice and the effect of 17β-estrodiol on protein S-nitrosylation. Biomed Pharmacother 2018991014–1021doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lavin B, Phinikaridou A, Lorrio S, Zaragoza C, Botnar RM. Monitoring vascular permeability and remodeling after endothelial injury in a murine model using a magnetic resonance albumin-binding contrast agent. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002417. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002417. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shahzad K, Thati M, Wang H, Kashif M, Wolter J, Ranjan S, He T, Zhou Q, Blessing E, Bierhaus A, et al. Minocycline reduces plaque size in diet induced atherosclerosis via p27(Kip1). Atherosclerosis 201121974–83doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohshima S, Fujimoto S, Petrov A, Nakagami H, Haider N, Zhou J, Tahara N, Osako MK, Fujimoto A, Zhu J, et al. Effect of an antimicrobial agent on atherosclerotic plaques: assessment of metalloproteinase activity by molecular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010551240–1249doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Phinikaridou A, Andia ME, Passacquale G, Ferro A, Botnar RM. Noninvasive MRI monitoring of the effect of interventions on endothelial permeability in murine atherosclerosis using an albumin-binding contrast agent. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000402. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000402. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Phinikaridou A, Andia ME, Protti A, Indermuehle A, Shah A, Smith A, Warley A, Botnar RM. Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of endothelial permeability in murine atherosclerosis using an albumin-binding contrast agent. Circulation 2012126707–719doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lobbes MB, Miserus RJ, Heeneman S, Passos VL, Mutsaers PH, Debernardi N, Misselwitz B, Post M, Daemen MJ, van Engelshoven JM, et al. Atherosclerosis: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of vessel wall in rabbit model–comparison of gadofosveset and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2009250682–691doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lobbes MB, Heeneman S, Passos VL, Welten R, Kwee RM, van der Geest RJ, Wiethoff AJ, Caravan P, Misselwitz B, Daemen MJ, et al. Gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a proof-of-concept study. Invest Radiol 201045275–281doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d5466b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Engel LC, Landmesser U, Gigengack K, Wurster T, Manes C, Girke G, Jaguszewski M, Skurk C, Leistner DM, Lauten A, et al. Novel approach for in vivo detection of vulnerable coronary plaques using molecular 3-T CMR imaging with an albumin-binding probe. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 201912297–306doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Makowski MR, Wiethoff AJ, Blume U, Cuello F, Warley A, Jansen CH, Nagel E, Razavi R, Onthank DC, Cesati RR, et al. Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden with an elastin-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent. Nat Med 201117383–388doi: 10.1038/nm.2310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Phinikaridou A, Andia ME, Indermuehle A, Onthank DC, Cesati RR, Smith A, Robinson SP, Saha P, Botnar RM. Vascular remodeling and plaque vulnerability in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis: comparison of delayed-enhancement MR imaging with an elastin-specific contrast agent and unenhanced black-blood MR imaging. Radiology 2014271390–399doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook TL, Wayne RR, Mudge GH, Alexander RW, Ganz P. Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 19863151046–1051doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610233151702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Swirski FK, Libby P, Aikawa E, Alcaide P, Luscinskas FW, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Ly-6Chi monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata. J Clin Invest 2007117195–205doi: 10.1172/JCI29950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gimbrone MA, Jr, García-Cardeña G. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016118620–636doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vita JA, Keaney JF., Jr. Endothelial function: a barometer for cardiovascular risk? Circulation 2002106640–642doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028581.07992.56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Le Brocq M, Leslie SJ, Milliken P, Megson IL. Endothelial dysfunction: from molecular mechanisms to measurement, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal 2008101631–1674doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Widlansky ME, Gokce N, Keaney JF, Jr, Vita JA. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003421149–1160doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00994-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim WY, Stuber M, Börnert P, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ, Botnar RM. Three-dimensional black-blood cardiac magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging detects positive arterial remodeling in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2002106296–299doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000025629.85631.1e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Botnar RM, Stuber M, Kissinger KV, Kim WY, Spuentrup E, Manning WJ. Noninvasive coronary vessel wall and plaque imaging with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 20001022582–2587doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.21.2582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Fallon JT, Jayasundera T, Worthley SG, Helft G, Aguinaldo JG, Badimon JJ, Sharma SK. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000102506–510doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.5.506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guo L, Akahori H, Harari E, Smith SL, Polavarapu R, Karmali V, Otsuka F, Gannon RL, Braumann RE, Dickinson MH, et al. CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability accompanied by inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 20181281106–1124doi: 10.1172/JCI93025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pedersen SF, Thrysøe SA, Paaske WP, Thim T, Falk E, Ringgaard S, Kim WY. CMR assessment of endothelial damage and angiogenesis in porcine coronary arteries using gadofosveset. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-10. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen H, Ricks J, Rosenfeld M, Kerwin WS. Progression of experimental lesions of atherosclerosis: assessment by kinetic modeling of black-blood dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2013691712–1720doi: 10.1002/mrm.24415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van Hoof RH, Heeneman S, Wildberger JE, Kooi ME. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to study atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18:33. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0583-4. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0583-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Momiyama Y, Kato R, Fayad ZA, Tanaka N, Taniguchi H, Ohmori R, Kihara T, Kameyama A, Miyazaki K, Kimura K, et al. A possible association between coronary plaque instability and complex plaques in abdominal aorta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 200626903–909doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000204637.00865.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Reiss AB, Siegart NM, De Leon J. Interleukin-6 in atherosclerosis: atherogenic or atheroprotective? Clinical Lipidology 20171214–23 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sarwar N, Butterworth AS, Freitag DF, Gregson J, Willeit P, Gorman DN, Gao P, Saleheen D, Rendon A, Nelson CP, et al. ; IL6R Genetics Consortium Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration Interleukin-6 receptor pathways in coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 82 studies. Lancet 20123791205–1213doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61931-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huber SA, Sakkinen P, Conze D, Hardin N, Tracy R. Interleukin-6 exacerbates early atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999192364–2367doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.10.2364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Elhage R, Clamens S, Besnard S, Mallat Z, Tedgui A, Arnal J, Maret A, Bayard F. Involvement of interleukin-6 in atherosclerosis but not in the prevention of fatty streak formation by 17beta-estradiol in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 2001156315–320doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00682-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schieffer B, Selle T, Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Grote K, Tietge UJ, Trautwein C, Luchtefeld M, Schmittkamp C, Heeneman S, et al. Impact of interleukin-6 on plaque development and morphology in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation 20041103493–3500doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148135.08582.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Frisdal E, Lesnik P, Olivier M, Robillard P, Chapman MJ, Huby T, Guerin M, Le Goff W. Interleukin-6 protects human macrophages from cellular cholesterol accumulation and attenuates the proinflammatory response. J Biol Chem 201128630926–30936doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.264325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cucuianu M, Coca M, Hâncu N. Reverse cholesterol transport and atherosclerosis. A mini review. Rom J Intern Med 20074517–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oda MN. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol: origins and the path ahead. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 201522133–141doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Makowski MR, Varma G, Wiethoff AJ, Smith A, Mattock K, Jansen CH, Warley A, Taupitz M, Schaeffter T, Botnar RM. Noninvasive assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression in ApoE-/- mice using susceptibility gradient mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 20114295–303doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.957209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fukumoto Y, Libby P, Rabkin E, Hill CC, Enomoto M, Hirouchi Y, Shiomi M, Aikawa M. Statins alter smooth muscle cell accumulation and collagen content in established atheroma of watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 2001103993–999doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.7.993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation 2001103926–933doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.7.926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Karatzis E, Lekakis J, Papamichael C, Andreadou I, Cimponeriu A, Aznaouridis K, Papaioannou TG, Protogerou A, Mavrikakis M. Rapid effect of pravastatin on endothelial function and lipid peroxidation in unstable angina. Int J Cardiol 200510165–70doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mendieta G, Ben-Aicha S, Gutiérrez M, Casani L, Aržanauskaitė M, Carreras F, Sabate M, Badimon L, Vilahur G. Intravenous statin administration during myocardial infarction compared with oral post-infarct administration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020751386–1402doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tawakol A, Fayad ZA, Mogg R, Alon A, Klimas MT, Dansky H, Subramanian SS, Abdelbaky A, Rudd JH, Farkouh ME, et al. Intensification of statin therapy results in a rapid reduction in atherosclerotic inflammation: results of a multicenter fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol 201362909–917doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Williams JK, Sukhova GK, Herrington DM, Libby P. Pravastatin has cholesterol-lowering independent effects on the artery wall of atherosclerotic monkeys. J Am Coll Cardiol 199831684–691doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00537-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ohgomori T, Hirano K, Uchimura K, Sakamoto K, Hirakawa A, Takeuchi H, Suzumura A, Ishiguro N, et al. Minocycline selectively inhibits M1 polarization of microglia. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e525. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.54. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ataie-Kachoie P, Morris DL, Pourgholami MH. Minocycline suppresses interleukine-6, its receptor system and signaling pathways and impairs migration, invasion and adhesion capacity of ovarian cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Campbell JH, Burdo TH, Autissier P, Bombardier JP, Westmoreland SV, Soulas C, González RG, Ratai EM, Williams KC. Minocycline inhibition of monocyte activation correlates with neuronal protection in SIV neuroAIDS. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Libbey JE, Kennett NJ, Wilcox KS, White HS, Fujinami RS. Interleukin-6, produced by resident cells of the central nervous system and infiltrating cells, contributes to the development of seizures following viral infection. J Virol 2011856913–6922doi: 10.1128/JVI.00458-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.