Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Public Health logoLink to BMC Public Health
. 2020 Aug 24;20:1276. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09345-6

Trends and determinants of underweight and overweight/obesity among urban Ethiopian women from 2000 to 2016

Kedir Y Ahmed 1,2,✉, Solomon Abrha 3, Andrew Page 1, Amit Arora 1,4,5,6, Solomon Shiferaw 7, Fentaw Tadese 8, Canaan Negash Seifu 9, Tebikew Yeneabat 10, Emana Alemu 11, Delelegn Yilma Gebremichael 12, Abdulaziz Seiko 13, Felix Akpojene Ogbo 1,14
PMCID: PMC7447570  PMID: 32838771

Abstract

Background

Nutritional, epidemiological and demographic transitions have been associated with the emergence of the double burden of malnutrition globally. In Ethiopia, there has been no nationally representative investigation of trends and determinants of both underweight and overweight/obesity among urban women. This study examined the trends and determinants of underweight and overweight/obesity in urban Ethiopian women from 2000 to 2016.

Methods

Trends in the prevalence of underweight and overweight/obesity were investigated based on a series of the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data for the years 2000 (n = 2559), 2005 (n = 1112), 2011 (n = 3569), and 2016 (n = 3106). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the association between socioeconomic, demographic, behavioural, and community-level factors with underweight and overweight/obesity.

Results

The prevalence of underweight in urban Ethiopian women reduced significantly from 23.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3, 26.3%) in 2000 to 14.8% (95% CI: 13.1, 16.7%) in 2016, while overweight/obesity increased significantly from 10.9% (95% CI: 9.1, 13.0%) in 2000 to 21.4% (95% CI: 18.2, 25.1%) in 2016. Urban women from rich households and those who had never married were less likely to be underweight. Urban women who were from wealthy households and those who attained at least secondary education were more likely to be overweight/obese. Women who were informally employed and listened to the radio were less likely to be overweight/obese compared to those who were unemployed and did not listen to the radio, respectively.

Conclusion

The prevalence of overweight/obesity increased from 2000 to 2016, with a concurrent reduction in the prevalence of underweight. Interventions aiming to reduce overweight and obesity should target urban women with higher education, those who resided in wealthier households and those who watched the television.

Keywords: Double burden of malnutrition, Underweight, Overweight, Obesity, Urban women, Ethiopia

Background

Nutritional, epidemiological and demographic transitions have been associated with the emergence of the double burden of malnutrition worldwide [1–3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines the double burden of malnutrition as “the coexistence of undernutrition along with overweight, obesity or diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs), within individuals, households, and populations, and across the life-course” [4]. Malnutrition (e.g., underweight and overweight/obesity) is associated with short- and long-term adverse consequences [5]. In early pubertal women, overweight/obesity is associated with psychosocial problems and abnormal uterine bleeding due to irregularity in the menstrual cycle from peripheral conversion of androgens to oestrogen [6–8]. For older women, overweight/obesity is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia, haemorrhage, caesarean birthing, and maternal and infant death during childbirth [9, 10]. In all populations, overweight/obesity is associated with an increased risk of NCDs such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [11].

Preventing malnutrition is one of the greatest global public health challenges as a result of a complex and non-linear relationship between nutritional, demographic and epidemiological transitions [4, 12]. Globally, nearly one-third of the population is affected by at least one form of malnutrition (either underweight or overweight/obesity) [4, 13]. In 2016, more than 600 million adults were underweight, while nearly 2 billion were overweight/obese [14–16]. Evidence has shown that both underweight and overweight/obesity are higher in women compared to men [17–19]. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs, including Ethiopia), an increase in overweight/obesity prevalence has occurred alongside the reduction in the burden of underweight, particularly in women of reproductive age group [4, 13]. The increasing burden of overweight/obesity has been attributed to a range of factors, including micro- and macro-economic growth and urbanisation [20, 21].

In Ethiopia, a sub-national study showed a reduction in the proportion of urban women with underweight [22]. Similarly, a previous national study conducted in Ethiopia based on the 2011 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data suggested that reproductive-aged women who were older, educated, married and those who resided in wealthier households were more likely to be overweight or obese compared to their counterparts [23]. Although important, these studies have several limitations. First, the studies did not consider the most recent national data (2016 EDHS). Up-to-date information based on the most recent data is essential as this survey potentially represents the current socio-demographic and economic context of the country. Second, these studies did not investigate the national trends in the prevalence of underweight and overweight/obesity as these data can provide additional information into where progress has been made and/or where specific efforts may be required. Third, these studies did not account for confounders in the modelling, a key methodological step in assessing an association between two variables of interest [24].

Understanding the national trends and determinants of underweight and overweight/obesity among women residing in urban households can inform policy responses towards the control and prevention of malnutrition in Ethiopia. This information is particularly useful to national and international stakeholders given the current implementation of nutrition efforts in Ethiopia [25, 26] within the context of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal 2.2 (SDG–2.2, end all forms of malnutrition by 2030) [27] and the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs target 9 (halt the rise in obesity) [28]. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate the trends and determinants of underweight and overweight/obesity in urban Ethiopian women from 2000 to 2016.

Methods

Data sources

This study used the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data for the years 2000 (n = 2559), 2005 (n = 1112), 2011 (n = 3569), and 2016 (n = 3106). The data were collected by the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) and Inner City Fund (ICF) International, with funding from the United States Agency for International Development [29] and the Government of Ethiopia [30–33]. The EDHS used a two-stage stratified cluster sampling technique to select the study participants. In stage one, after each administrative region was stratified into urban and rural strata, Enumeration Areas (EAs) were selected using a probability proportional to EA size. In stage two, a household listing operation was carried out in all of the selected EAs and a fixed number of households from each EA were selected [30–33]. All women aged 15–49 years who were permanent residents or who spend the night in the selected households the night before the survey were included in the surveys [30–35]. A weighted total sample of 10,346 women was used, with high response rates that ranged from 94.6 to 97.8%. Detailed methodological strategies used in the surveys have been described elsewhere [30–33]. The present study focused on urban women because past studies have shown that urbanisation is a contributor to the double of malnutrition [20, 21], and women are more likely to be underweight and/or overweight/obese compared to men [14].

Outcome variables

The main outcome variables were underweight and overweight/obesity, measured based on WHO adult body mass index (BMI) classification [15] and used by the Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency and ICF International [29]. BMI was defined as a woman’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of her height in meters (kg/m2). The EDHS used lightweight SECA mother scale to measure weight and Shorr measuring board to assess height [30–33]. BMI was classified into three groups:

  • Underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m2

  • Normal: BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 and BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2

  • Overweight/obesity: BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2

Study variables

The study broadly categorised the study factors as socioeconomic, demographic, behavioural and community-level factors based on previous studies [36, 37]. The selected study factors are associated with underweight and overweight/obesity in reproductive-aged women in previously published studies from LMICs [22, 23, 38–41].

Socioeconomic factors included women’s highest education, women’s employment status, marital status, and household wealth status. Women’s education was classified as ‘no schooling’, ‘primary education or ‘secondary or higher education’. Women’s employment was classified as ‘no employment’, ‘formal employment’ (i.e., professional, technical, managerial, clerical, and services area workers), or ‘informal employment’ (i.e., agricultural and manual workers) [36, 42]. Marital status was classified as ‘never married’, ‘formerly married’ or ‘currently married’. The EDHS used principal components analysis (PCA) to calculate the household wealth index based on a series of variables relating to ownership of household assets such as television and bicycles; type of materials used for housing construction; and types of water source and sanitation facilities [43]. The household wealth index was classified as ‘poor’, ‘middle’ or ‘rich’, consistent with previously published studies [44, 45].

Demographic and behavioural factors included women’s age, parity, listening to the radio, reading newspapers/magazine, and watching television. Women’s age was classified as ‘15–24 years’, ‘25–34 years’ or ‘35 and above years’, and women’s parity classified as ‘none’, ‘1–4 children’ or ‘5 or more children’. Women who reported exposure to the media (radio, magazine/newspaper or television) at least once a week were classified as ‘Yes’ and those who did not were classified as ‘No’. Community-level factor (i.e. region of residence) was classified as ‘Tigray’, ‘Afar’, ‘Amhara’, ‘Oromia’, ‘Somali’, ‘Benishangul’, ‘Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR)’, ‘Gambella’, or ‘Metropolis’ regions based on Ethiopia’s geopolitical and administrative features, consistent with the EDHS report and previously published studies [30–33, 36]. The Metropolis region included Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa city administrations, and the Harari region. Among the study participants, about 44.1% of women had no employment, and nearly half (47.1%) of them were in the 15–24 years’ age group (Additional file 1).

Statistical analysis

Preliminary analyses involved the description of the study participants by calculating frequencies and percentages of the study variables. This was followed by the estimation of the prevalence of the outcome variables (underweight and overweight/obesity) and by the selected study variables (socioeconomic, demographic, behavioural and community-level factors) in both year-specific data (2000, 2005, 2011 and 2016) and in the combined dataset. Then, percentage point change with corresponding 95% CI of the outcome variables calculated by each of the study factors to examine the changes over the EDHS years (from 2000 to 2005, from 2005 to 2011, from 2011 to 2016 and from 2005 to 2016) [Additional files 2, 3 and 4]. We used the combined dataset to increase the statistical power of the study in order to detect any association between the study factors and the outcomes, as well as to examine trends in underweight and overweight/obesity over the study period (2000–2016).

Multivariable multinomial logistic regression modelling was used to examine the association between socioeconomic, demographic, behavioural and community-level factors and (i) underweight and (ii) overweight/obesity using the normal weight group as a reference category. Specifically, socioeconomic factors were entered into the model to assess their relationship with the outcomes, with adjustment for demographic, behavioural and community-level factors (stage 1). A similar strategy was used in models of demographic factors to examine their relationship with the outcome variables, with additional adjustment for socioeconomic, behavioural and community-level factors (stage 2). Similar modelling techniques were used for the behavioural and community-level factors in the third and fourth stages (stages 3 and 4), respectively.

In the models, we adjusted for the survey years in the combined dataset, while sampling weight and clustering were accounted for in both the year-specific and combined datasets. Collinearity was checked using ‘variance inflation factor (VIF)’ but no significant results were evident in the analyses. We also estimated P for trends in each category of the study variables to assess for any convergence or divergence. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated as the measure of association between study factors and outcome variables. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata version 14.0 with ‘svy’ command to adjust for sampling weights, clustering effects and stratification, and the ‘mlogit’ function was used for the modelling.

Results

Prevalence of underweight and overweight/obesity

Over the study period (2000–2016), the highest prevalence of underweight was observed among urban women who resided in the Gambella region of Ethiopia (28.7%), followed by women from the Tigray region (28.0%). The lowest underweight prevalence was found among women from the SNNPR region (13.1%) (Table 1). During the same period, urban women aged 35–49 years had the highest prevalence of overweight/obesity (27.4%), followed by women who resided in the Somali region (23.0%). The lowest prevalence of overweight/obesity was observed among urban women aged 15–24 years of age (7.9%) (Table 2).

Table 1.

Prevalence of underweight by study variables among urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016

Variables 2000 2005 2011 2016 2000–2016 2000–2016
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) aDiff (95% CI)
Socioeconomic factors
 Women’s education
  No schooling 230 (26.4) 55 (21.4) 155 (20.3) 67 (12.9) 507 (21.0) −13.5 (−20.1, − 6.8)
  Primary school 121 (19.3) 55 (19.5) 344 (22.4) 134 (12.7) 653 (18.7) −6.6 (− 11.7, − 1.5)
  Secondary and higher 242 (22.8) 99 (17.3) 217 (17.1) 259 (16.8) 816 (18.4) −6.0 (−10.8, − 1.1)
 Women’s employment
  No employment 278 (25.0) 123 (19.3) 318 (21.2) 226 (17.6) 946 (20.8) −7.4 (−13.1, − 1.6)
  Formal employment 176 (19.0) 58 (16.4) 260 (18.1) 183 (12.7) 677 (16.3) −6.3 (−11.5, − 1.1)
  Informal employment 129 (26.2) 28 (23.5) 131 (21.5) 50 (13.2) 338 (21.1) −13.0 (−22.3, − 3.6)
 Marital status
  Not married 256 (23.6) 113 (21.8) 354 (23.2) 246 (19.3) 970 (22.0) −4.4 (−9.1, 0.5)
  Currently married 204 (20.5) 53 (13.1) 260 (16.5) 132 (9.4) 650 (14.8) −11.1 (−15.3, −6.8)
  Formerly married 132 (27.9) 43 (22.6) 101 (21.5) 81,919.3) 357 (23.0) −8.7 (−16.5, −0.6)
 Household wealth status
  Poor 427 (26.5) 138 (22.4) 48 (51.0) 14 (12.5) 628 (25.7) −11.3 (−22.4, −0.2)
  Middle 121 (18.8) 42 (16.4) 4 (10.7) 14 (34.8) 181 (18.5) 16.3 (−9.3, 42.0)
  Rich 4 (6.3) 11 (10.1) 716 (19.3) 431 (14.6) 1110 (16.9) −9.9 (−13.3, −6.5)
 Toilet facility
  Unimproved 196 (26.4) 115 (22.1) 477 (23.2) 226 (14.9) 1014 (21.0) −11.6 (−18.0, − 5.2)
  Improved 397 (21.8) 87 (15.4) 235 (15.8) 227 (14.8) 947 (17.5) −7.0 (−11.8, −2.3)
 Source of drinking water
  Unimproved 89 (24.5) 18 (21.1) 65 (21.3) 85 (15.8) 257 (19.9) −8.7 (−15.3, −2.1)
  Improved 504 (23.00 192 (18.6) 651 (19.9) 374 (14.6) 1719 (19.0) −8.4 (−12.5, −4.3)
Demographic factors
 Women’s age
  15–24 years 291 (23.2) 114 (20.1) 385 (22.2) 255 (19.4) 1045 (21.5) −3.8 (−8.3, 0.7)
  25–34 years 127 (18.5) 53 (18.6) 190 (17.3) 124 (11.7) 494 (15.8) −6.8 (− 11.9, − 1.7)
  35–49 years 174 (28.4) 41 (16.1) 141 (19.0) 80 (10.9) 437 (18.6) −17.5 (−24.1, − 10.9)
 Parity
  None 285 (23.0) 120 (20.6) 382 (22.1) 288 (18.9) 1074 (21.2) −4.1 (−8.5, 0.4)
  1–4 children 188 (21.4) 59 (15.3) 245 (16.8) 144 (11.0) 636 (15.8) −10.4 (−15.2, −5.6)
  5+ children 120 (27.1) 29 (21.1) 90 (23.3) 28 (9.9) 267 (21.4) −17.3 (−25.7, −8.8)
Behavioural factors
 Listening radio
  No 165 (26.2) 44 (20.9) 216 (25.5) 228 (16.8) 653 (21.5) −9.4 (−15.3, −3.5)
  Yes 427 (22.2) 165 (18.4) 499 (18.4) 231 (13.2) 1322 (18.1) −9.0 (−13.2, −4.8)
 Read magazine
  No 354 (22.9) 105 (19.9) 411 (20.9) 295 (14.2) 1165 (19.1) −8.7 (−12.9, −4.6)
  Yes 239 (23.5) 102 (17.7) 304 (19.2) 164 (15.9) 809 (19.2) −7.6 (−12.6, −2.7)
 Watch television
  No 305 (25.2) 71 (24.3) 168 (22.9) 105 (14.7) 650 (22.0) −10.5 (−17.0, −3.9)
  Yes 288 (21.4) 138 (16.9) 548,919.3) 354 (14.8) 1327 (17.9) −6.5 (−10.7, −2.5)
Community-level factors
 Region of residence
  Tigray 73 (33.1) 28 (31.8) 79 (28.4) 55 (21.9) 235 (28.0) −11.1 (−19.3, −3.1)
  Afar 5 (18.4) 2914.2) 11 (31.2) 8 (23.7) 26 (23.6) 5.3 (−1.5, 12.1)
  Amhara 139 (31.3) 32 (18.2) 219 (24.9) 95 (14.5) 485 (22.5) −16.8 (−26.8, −6.8)
  Oromia 163 (20.1) 65 (19.2) 169 (19.8) 130 (16.8) 527 (19.0) −3.3 (−10.4, 3.9)
  Somali 25 (52.2) 9 (22.7) 23 (20.1) 12 (18.1) 70 (25.7) −34 (−5.3, −15.6)
  Benishangul 6 (42.7) 2 (35.6) 8 (22.6) 3 (12.3) 19 (24.4) −30.3 (− 38.6, −22.0)
  SNNPRb 44 (17.4) 15 (16.2) 71 (14.9) 25 (7.0) 154 (13.1) −10.4 (−19.7, − 1.1)
  Gambella 4 (31.0) 1 (16.2) 5 (27.2) 5 (28.9) 15 (28.7) −2.1 (−22.1, 17.9)
  Metropolis 134 (18.4) 55 (15.6) 131 (14.9) 125 (13.6) 445 (15.5) −4.8 (−7.4, −2.1)
Open in a new tab

n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable

aDiff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016

bSNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region

Table 2.

Prevalence of overweight/obesity by study variables among urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016

Variables 2000 2005 2011 2016 2000–2016 2000–2016
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) aDiff (95% CI)
Socioeconomic factors
 Women’s education
  No schooling 64 (7.4) 30 (11.5) 105 (13.7) 95 (18.5) 294 (12.2) 11.1 (6.1, 16.2)
  Primary school 64 (10.3) 30 (10.6) 201 (13.1) 228 (21.7) 523 (15.0) 11.3 (5.1, 17.6)
  Secondary and higher 151 (14.2) 98 (17.2) 228 (18.0) 341 (22.2) 818 (18.4) 8.0 (3.1, 12.9)
 Women’s employment
  No employment 109 (9.8) 76 (12.0) 206 (13.7) 219 (17.1) 610 (13.5) 7.3 (2.9, 11.6)
  Formal employment 133 (14.3) 75 (21.1) 258 (18.0) 391 (27.2) 857 (20.6) 12.8 (7.1, 18.6)
  Informal employment 37 (7.4) 6 (5.0) 68 (11.2) 54 (14.3) 165 (10.3) 6.9 (3.5, 13.4)
 Marital status
  Not married 88 (8.1) 43 (8.4) 113 (7.4) 143 (11.2) 388 (8.8) 3.1 (−0.4, 6.6)
  Currently married 144 (14.4) 85 (21.1) 348 (22.1) 414 (29.4) 992 (22.6) 14.9 (8.3, 21.6)
  Formerly married 47 (9.9) 29 (15.5) 72 (15.3) 107 (25.5) 256 (16.5) 15.6 (7.7, 23.9)
 Household wealth status
  Poor 135 (8.4) 54 (8.8) 3 (2.8) 3 (2.9) 195 (8.0) −6.8 (−12.3, −1.3)
  Middle 107 (16.6) 54 (21.2) 1 (2.1) 162 (16.6) −10.3 (−16.3, −4.4)
  Rich 8 (11.6) 30 (27.4) 531 (15.4) 661 (22.4) 1229 (18.7) 11.8 (7.5, 16.2)
 Toilet facility
  Unimproved 46 (6.2) 50 (9.6) 205 (10.0) 216 (14.2) 517 (10.7) 8.0 (3.3, 12.7)
  Improved 233 (12.8) 102 (18.1) 325 (21.7) 437 (28.4) 1096 (20.3) 15.6 (10.6, 20.5)
 Source of drinking water
  Unimproved 33 (9.1) 4 (4.3) 37 (12.1) 66 (12.2) 140 (10.8) 3.1 (−4.3, 10.6)
  Improved 246 (11.2) 154 (15.0) 496 (15.2) 599 (23.4) 1496 (16.5) 12.1 (7.7, 16.6)
Demographic factors
 Women’s age
  15–24 years 85 (6.8) 42 (7.4) 128 (7.4) 131 (10.0) 386 (7.9) 3.2 (−0.1, 6.5)
  25–34 years 93 (13.6) 57 (19.9) 197 (18.0) 260 (24.6) 607 (19.4) 11.1 (5.7, 16.4)
  35–49 years 101 (16.5) 58 (22.7) 29 (28.1) 274 (37.4) 642 (27.4) 20.9 (11.8, 30.1)
 Parity
  None 105 (8.5) 57 (9.7) 145 (8.4) 191 (12.6) 498 (9.8) 4.1 (0.5, 7.7)
  1–4 children 115 (13.2) 76 (19.5) 309 (21.2) 408 (31.3) 908 (22.6) 18.1 (12.0, 24.2)
  5+ children 59 (13.3) 25 (18.3) 79 (20.5) 65 (23.3) 229 (18.3) 10.0 (−0.2, 20.2)
Behavioural factors
 Listening radio
  No 49 (7.8) 33 (15.9) 130 (15.4) 261 (19.3) 474 (15.6) 11.5 (6.1, 16.8)
  Yes 230 (12.0) 122 (13.6) 403 (14.9) 403 (23.0) 1158 (15.9) 11.1 (6.8, 15.4)
 Read magazine
  No 157 (10.1) 70 (13.2) 282 (14.3) 382 (18.4) 890 (14.6) 8.3 (3.9, 12.6)
  Yes 122 (12.1) 88 (15.3) 251 (15.8) 283 (27.4) 743 (17.7) 15.3 (10.5, 20.2)
 Watch television
  No 87 (7.2) 29 (9.9) 56 (7.6) 72 (10.1) 244 (8.3) 3.0 (−1.7, 7.6)
  Yes 192 (14.3) 129 (15.7) 477 (16.9) 592 (24.8) 1390 (18.8) 10.5 (6.0, 15.1)
Community-level factors
 Region of residence
  Tigray 6 (2.7) 4 (4.5) 24 (8.8) 41 (16.1) 75 (9.0) 13.4 (7.3, 19.6)
  Afar 4 (12.5) 2 (18.3) 4 (10.1) 6 (19.0) 16 (14.3) 6.5 (−2.8, 15.9)
  Amhara 34 (7.5) 20 (11.3) 74 (8.5) 71 (10.7) 198 (9.2) 3.2 (−2.2, 8.6)
  Oromia 87 (10.7) 48 (14.2) 121 (14.2) 194 (25.1) 451 (16.2) 14.3 (2.5, 26.1)
  Somali 4 (8.3) 11 (26.1) 31 (26.8) 17 (25.0) 62 (23.0) 16.7 (7.7, 25.6)
  Benishangul 1 (2.9) 1 (10.8) 3 (9.0) 5 (20.5) 9 (11.3) 17.6 (11.1, 24.1)
  SNNPRb 27 (10.7) 10 (10.8) 97 (20.5) 60 (16.5) 194 (16.4) 5.8 (−7.8, 19.4)
  Gambella 1 (3.8) 1 (5.2) 3 (13.6) 2 (13.5) 6 (10.9) 9.7 (4.2, 15.1)
  Metropolis 117 (16.1) 62 (17.6) 177 (20.1) 269 (29.4) 625 (21.7) 13.3 (10.5, 16.0)
Open in a new tab

n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable

aDiff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016

bSNNPR: Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region

Trends in underweight and overweight/obesity

The proportion of underweight among urban Ethiopian women decreased significantly from 23.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3, 26.3%) in 2000 to 14.8% (95% CI: 13.1, 16.7%) in 2016 (Fig. 1). Between 2000 to 2016, the largest decrease in underweight was observed among women who resided in the Benishangul region (Diff = − 30.3; 95% CI: − 38.6, − 22.0), followed by those aged 35–49 years (Diff = − 17.3; 95% CI: − 25.7, − 8.8) (Table 1). The prevalence of overweight/obesity increased significantly from 10.9% (95% CI: 9.1, 13.0%) in 2000 to 21.4% (95% CI: 18.2, 25.1%) in 2016 (Fig. 1). The highest increase in percentage point of overweight/obesity was found among women aged 34–49 years (Diff = 20.9; 95% CI: 11.8, 30.1), followed by those who had 1–4 live birth children (Diff = 18.1; 95% CI: 12.0, 24.2) (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Trends in underweight and overweight/obesity among urban women in Ethiopia from 2000 to 2016. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval

Determinants of underweight among urban Ethiopian women

Over the study period, married women had lower odds of being underweight compared to those who were never married (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.91). The odds of women from wealthier households being underweight was significantly lower compared to those who were from poorer households (AOR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.89). Urban women who resided in Oromia (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.86), SNNPR (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.63), and Metropolis (AOR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.67) regions had lower odds of being underweight compared to those who resided in the Tigray region (Table 3).

Table 3.

Determinants of underweight among urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016

Variables 2000 2005 2011 2016 2000–2016 P for trend
aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI)
Socioeconomic factors
 Women’s education
  No schooling 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.005
  Primary school 0.86 (0.56, 1.31) 0.97 (0.44, 2.18) 1.27 (0.83, 1.92) 1.00 (0.57, 1.76) 1.00 (0.82, 1.21) 0.115
  Secondary and higher 1.10 (0.69, 1.78) 0.93 (0.43, 2.03) 0.99 (0.68, 1.47) 1.35 (0.77, 2.37) 1.28 (0.94, 1.74) 0.225
 Women’s employment
  No employment 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.265
  Formal employment 0.73 (0.49, 1.08) 0.93 (0.64, 1.36) 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) 0.76 (0.56, 1.04) 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) 0.119
  Informal employment 0.98 (0.50, 1.92) 1.02 (0.61, 1.70) 0.86 (0.57, 1.27) 0.73 (0.44, 1.22) 0.90 (0.69, 1.17) 0.021
 Marital status
  Not married 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.330
  Currently married 0.73 (0.42, 1.26) 0.38 (0.17, 0.84) 0.59 (0.24, 1.42) 0.82 (0.45, 1.48) 0.63 (0.44, 0.91) 0.001
  Formerly married 1.12 (0.69, 1.81) 0.90 (0.45, 1.81) 0.74 (0.32, 1.71) 1.77 (0.91, 3.45) 1.05 (0.76, 1.45) 0.132
 Household wealth status
  Poor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.892
  Middle 0.77 (0.56, 1.06) 0.89 (0.61, 1.30) 0.10 (0.03, 0.31) 2.99 (0.90, 9.97) 0.76 (0.58, 0.99) 0.931
  Rich 0.25 (0.11, 0.55) 0.52 (0.24, 1.11) 0.29 (0.13, 0.68) 0.74 (0.35, 1.56) 0.69 (0.54, 0.89) 0.001
Demographic factors
 Women’s age
  15–24 years 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.484
  25–34 years 0.94 (0.62, 1.41) 1.37 (0.70, 2.66) 1.10 (0.78, 1.55) 0.88 (0.58, 1.34) 0.99 (0.82, 1.20) 0.028
  35–49 years 1.63 (0.91, 2.92) 0.81 (0.39, 1.68) 1.29 (0.72, 2.32) 1.00 (0.59, 1.70) 1.21 (0.89, 1.66) < 0.001
 Parity
  None 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.460
  1–4 children 1.06 (0.69, 1.63) 1.12 (0.46, 2.71) 1.15 (0.53, 2.50) 0.77 (0.46, 1.27) 1.03 (0.74, 1.43) 0.010
  5+ children 1.12 (0.55, 2.28) 1.79 (0.54, 5.92) 1.34 (0.41, 4.40) 0.67 (0.27, 1.65) 1.23 (0.76, 1.99) < 0.001
Behavioural factors
 Listening radio
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.085
  Yes 0.77 (0.67, 1.34) 1.03 (0.61, 1.77) 0.65 (0.49, 0.85) 0.67 (0.45, 0.98) 0.64 (0.66, 0.93) 0.038
 Read magazine
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.004
  Yes 1.28 (0.82, 2.00) 1.04 (0.49, 2.20) 1.06 (0.82, 1.37) 1.23 (0.98, 1.53) 1.14 (0.96, 1.34) 0.116
 Watch television
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.005
  Yes 1.03 (0.79, 1.36) 0.76 (0.50, 1.14) 1.09 (0.82, 1.43) 1.16 (0.61, 2.22) 1.03 (0.84, 1.25) 0.155
Community-level factor
 Region of residence
  Tigray 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.279
  Afar 0.61 (0.41, 0.92) 0.44 (0.17, 1.10) 1.09 (0.68, 1.75) 1.21 (0.78, 1.86) 0.91 (0.67, 1.22) 0.009
  Amhara 1.00 (0.53, 1.88) 0.47 90.23, 0.97) 0.81 (0.39, 1.67) 0.54 (0.32, 0.90) 0.75 (0.51, 1.10) 0.014
  Oromia 0.70 (0.42, 1.16) 0.57 (0.25, 1.33) 0.70 (0.45, 1.11) 0.82 (0.56, 1.19) 0.67 (0.52, 0.86) 0.969
  Somali 3.06 (1.18, 7.89) 0.91 (0.43, 1.93) 0.63 (0.36, 1.11) 0.85 (0.47, 1.53) 1.04 (0.67, 1.63) 0.016
  Benishangul 1.63 (1.04, 2.54) 1.20 (0.32, 4.46) 0.54 (0.29, 1.00) 0.49 (0.20, 1.25) 0.87 (0.63, 1.21) 0.003
  SNNPRb 0.54 (0.23, 1.28) 0.33 (0.16, 0.72) 0.50 (0.27, 0.95) 0.24 (0.14, 0.42) 0.43 (0.30, 0.61) < 0.001
  Gambella 1.17 (0.40, 3.38) 0.93 (0.28, 3.15) 0.72 (0.37, 1.43) 1.32 (0.83, 2.08) 1.10 (0.75, 1.63) 0.521
  Metropolis 0.64 (0.42, 0.99) 0.49 (0.28, 0.84) 0.51 (0.34, 0.76) 0.70 (0.54, 0.92) 0.55 (0.46, 0.67) 0.901
Open in a new tab

aAORs of socioeconomic factors were adjusted for demographic, behavioural and community level factors; AORs of demographic factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, behavioural and community level factors; AORs of behavioural factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, demographic, and community level factors; AORs of community-level factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioural factors

bSNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region

Determinants of overweight/obesity among urban Ethiopian women

Between 2000 and 2016, urban women who attended secondary or higher education had higher odds of being overweight/obese compared to those who had no schooling (AOR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.21). The likelihood of urban women who were informally employed being overweight/obesity was significantly lower compared to those who were not employed (AOR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53; 0.90). Women from wealthier households were more likely to be overweight/obese compared to those who were from poorer households (AOR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.22). Women who listened to the radio had lower odds of being overweight/obese (AOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.93) compared to those who did not listen to the radio. Women who watched television had higher odds of being overweight/obese (AOR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.75, 3.21) compared to those who did not watch television. Women who were from Oromia (AOR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.31, 2.91), Somali (AOR = 4.93; 95% CI: 3.24, 7.49), SNNPR (AOR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.90) and Metropolis (AOR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.73, 3.21) regions were more likely to be overweight/obese compared to those who resided in the Tigray region (Table 4).

Table 4.

Determinants of overweight/obesity among urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016

Variables 2000 2005 2011 2016 2000–2016 P for trend
aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI) aAOR (95% CI)
Socioeconomic factors
 Women’s education
  No schooling 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.126
  Primary school 1.65 (1.02, 2.65) 1.64 (0.89, 3.03) 1.24 (0.84, 1.83) 1.19 (0.86, 1.64) 1.33 (1.06,1.68) 0.157
  Secondary and higher 2.69 (1.27, 5.71) 1.58 (0.72, 3.48) 1.66 (1.04, 2.67) 1.14 (0.71, 1.84) 1.61 (1.18, 2.21) 0.013
 Women’s employment
  No employment 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.162
  Formal employment 1.26 (0.81, 1.96) 1.31 (0.81, 2.13) 1.02 (0.75, 1.38) 1.42 (1.06, 1.90) 1.23 (1.02, 1.47) 0.044
  Informal employment 0.74 (0.39, 1.43) 0.45 (0.17, 1.19) 0.79 (0.50, 1.25) 0.62 (0.43, 0.90) 0.69 (0.53, 0.90) 0.612
 Women’s status
  Not married 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.182
  Currently married 1.51 (0.71, 3.23) 2.11 (0.95, 4.69) 2.03 (1.26, 3.26) 2.07 (1.35, 3.18) 1.87 (1.43, 2.46) 0.057
  Formerly married 1.34 (0.54, 3.32) 2.00 (1.03, 3.83) 1.15 (0.51, 2.58) 1.54 (1.05, 2.26) 1.32 (0.94, 1.86) 0.064
 Household wealth status
  Poor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.534
  Middle 1.43 (0.98, 2.10) 2.97 (1.69, 5.24) 3.12 (1.21, 8.03) 0.94 (0.16, 5.63) 1.46 (1.06, 1.90) 0.008
  Rich 0.67 (0.31, 1.48) 3.52 (1.83, 6.77) 3.80 (1.97, 7.33) 4.43 (1.82, 10.79) 1.64 (1.21, 2.22) 0.001
Demographic factors
 Women’s age
  15–24 years 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.357
  25–34 years 1.65 (0.90, 3.00) 2.43 (1.47, 3.99) 2.05 (1.34, 3.16) 2.00 (1.33, 3.02) 2.05 (1.63, 2.59) 0.044
  35–49 years 3.50 (1.60, 7.69) 2.53 (1.17, 5.43) 4.64 (2.82, 7.63) 4.35 (2.90, 6.53) 4.47 (3.39, 5.88) 0.115
 Parity
  None 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.432
  1–4 children 0.97 (0.53, 1.77) 0.89 (0.47, 1.67) 1.12 (0.70, 1.78) 1.21 (0.76, 1.94) 1.10 (0.84, 1.44) 0.004
  5+ children 0.72 (0.35, 1.47) 1.25 (0.42, 3.77) 0.94 (0.48, 1.87) 0.82 (0.42, 1.61) 0.80 (0.55, 1.17) 0.054
Behavioural factors
 Listening radio
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.072
  Yes 0.88 (0.48, 1.62) 0.63 (0.30, 1.35) 0.70 (0.47, 1.04) 0.69 (0.54, 0.88) 0.76 (0.62, 0.93) 0.009
 Read magazine
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.541
  Yes 0.67 (0.42, 1.08) 1.12 (0.64, 1.95) 1.04 (0.78, 1.39) 1.56 (1.14, 2.14) 1.12 (0.93, 1.35) < 0.001
 Watch television
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.959
  Yes 1.66 (0.96, 2.87) 1.43 (0.68, 3.03) 2.45 (1.30, 4.60) 2.50 (1.41, 4.45) 2.37 (1.75, 3.21) 0.002
Community-level factors
 Region of residence
  Tigray 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 < 0.001
  Afar 4.54 (2.25, 9.15) 3.66 (0.89, 15.01) 1.08 (0.48, 2.45) 1.34 (0.65, 2.78) 1.71 (1.13, 2.60) 0.760
  Amhara 1.67 (1.15, 6.18) 3.04 (0.83, 11.19) 0.98 (0.42, 2.28) 0.62 (0.35, 1.11) 1.02 (0.68, 1.52) 0.176
  Oromia 4.59 (2.04, 10.33) 3.53 (0.99, 12.45) 1.58 (0.76, 3.27) 1.62 (0.85, 3.10) 1.95 (1.31, 2.91) 0.327
  Somali 6.66 (1.48, 29.4) 6.20 (2.41, 16.00) 5.81 (2.70, 12.52) 3.13 (1.86, 5.26) 4.93 (3.24, 7.49) 0.875
  Benishangul 1.34 (0.20, 8.91) 4.78 (0.98, 23.24) 1.08 (0.46, 2.52) 1.85 (0.98, 3.50) 1.59 (1.01, 2.48) 0.083
  SNNPR 3.87 (0.94, 15.97) 2.44 (0.78, 7.58) 2.39 (1.17, 4.87) 1.29 (0.73, 2.29) 1.89 (1.23, 2.90) 0.802
  Gambella 1.64 (0.64, 4.18) 0.88 (0.26, 2.93) 1.43 (0.56, 3.63) 0.99 (0.56, 1.78) 1.21 (0.76, 1.87) 0.063
  Metropolis 4.20 (2.03, 8.68) 2.45 (0.99, 6.04) 2.15 (1.16, 3.99) 2.14 (1.40, 3.26) 2.35 (1.73, 3.21) < 0.001
Open in a new tab

aAORs of socioeconomic factors were adjusted for demographic, behavioural and community level factors; AORs of demographic factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, behavioural and community level factors; AORs of behavioural factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, demographic, and community level factors; AORs of community-level factors were adjusted for socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioural factors

bSNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region

Discussion

The prevalence of underweight in urban Ethiopian women decreased from 23.2% in 2000 to 14.8% in 2016, while overweight/obesity prevalence increased from 10.9% in 2000 to 21.4% in 2016. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of women being underweight in Urban Ethiopia included higher household wealth, never being married, and residence in Oromia, SNNPR, and Metropolis regions. Belonging to wealthier households, higher educational attainment and watching TV were associated with urban Ethiopian women being overweight/obese. Informal employment and listening to the radio were associated with a reduced likelihood of women being overweight/obese.

Evidence has shown that the relationship between household wealth and underweight and/or overweight/obesity differs across socioeconomic levels at the global, regional, national and subnational levels [22, 41, 46–49]. In LMICs, individuals from wealthy households have a higher risk of being overweight/obese compared to those from poorer households [46–49]. In the present study, women from wealthier households were more likely to be overweight/obese but less likely to be underweight compared to those who were from poorer households. These findings are similar to evidence from South Asian [18, 50] and sub-Saharan Africa countries [23, 39], which showed that wealthier women were more likely to be overweight/obese but less likely to be underweight compared to counterparts. A possible explanation for the high likelihood of urban Ethiopian women from wealthier households being overweight/obese may be due to lifestyle and dietary choices. Women from wealthier households may be less physically active and also have better healthy dietary choices (such as poor consumption of fruits and vegetables, and a higher intake of highly caloric foods) compared to those who reside in poor households [51, 52]. Our study also showed that women who were from wealthier households were less likely to be underweight compared to those from poorer households. The economic disadvantage of urban women from poorer households may explain the negative relationship between higher households’ wealth and underweight [53]. Our findings suggest that interventions to reduce overweight/obesity and NCDs and improve underweight should target women from both poor and rich households in urban Ethiopia.

Studies from high-income countries have shown that women who attained higher education had reduced risk of developing overweight/obesity compared to those with lower education [54–56]. However, in LMICs, educated women were more likely to be overweight/obese compared to those with no education [56, 57]. Our study indicated that urban women who had secondary or higher education were more likely to be overweight/obese compared to those who had no schooling. The positive association between higher educational attainment and overweight/obesity among women has also been reported in studies conducted in Ghana [39], Bangladesh [19], regional and national levels in Ethiopia [22, 23]. This relationship may be due to a range of factors. First, women in LMICs perceive overweight/obesity or ‘round body’ frame as an indicator of socioeconomic success, and this perception possibly allows women to ‘celebrate’ increasing weight gain [39, 58]. Second, it may be due to a shift from more physically active occupations (e.g. construction labour works) to less active or sedentary occupations (e.g. office works) [23, 59].

Consistent with previously published studies [60–62], the current study found that urban Ethiopian women who were employed in manual jobs had a lower risk of being overweight/obese compared to those who were not in employment. There are two likely explanations for the observed relationship between informal employment and overweight/obesity. Firstly, informally employed women are often employed in labour-intensive or physically active jobs like construction labourer, and this may be associated with negative energy balance [62]. Secondly, the limited purchasing power of women, due to lower wages from informal employment, may not allow women to purchase energy-dense or junk foods [63]. These findings suggest that health and social policy interventions for urban Ethiopian women should focus on modifiable socio-economic factors such as improvement in female education and employment opportunities to reduce the burden of overweight/obesity. Additionally, health education on physical activity and healthy dietary options are also essential given the improvement in socio-economics status of women in LMICs which may be associated with overweight/obesity among women in these settings [64, 65].

Sedentary behaviours (including watching television) and inadequate physical activity have been documented as risk factors for overweight/obesity [66, 67]. Consistent with this evidence, the present study showed that urban women who watched television had higher odds of being overweight/obese compared to those who did not watch television. Studies conducted in Ghana [39], Bangladesh [66], and Myanmar [68] have also reported the association between watching television and overweight/obesity. This finding may be related to a reduced level of physical activity among individuals as a result of increased sitting time [66, 67]. In addition, in LMICs, having a television can also be a proxy indicator for the higher socioeconomic status of women, which may increase the risk of exposure to energy-dense and junk foods [51, 52]. Urban women who listened to the radio were less likely to be overweight/obese compared to that not-listened radio. It is possible that urban Ethiopian women who resided in poorer households or urban slums were more likely to listen to the radio compared to those who were from wealthy households. Past studies have suggested that health promotion through electronic media (such as radio and television) showed improvement in the awareness of dietary habits and active lifestyle of women [69, 70]. The use of electronic media for improving physical activity and healthy dietary choices of urban Ethiopian women is warranted.

This study has limitations. First, this study used cross-sectional data which presents difficulty in establishing a temporal association between the study factors and the outcome measures. Nevertheless, the observed associations are consistent with cohort [71] and cross-sectional studies from LMICs [23, 39, 66, 68]. Second, the study was limited by the non-availability of data on key confounders such as dietary intake, length of time in watching TV, physical activity and total energy expenditure of the urban women, as the EDHS did not collect information on these variables. Third, the study factors were measured based on self-report questionnaires is a source of measurement bias which may either over- or under-estimate the measure of association between the study factors and outcome variables. Despite the above limitations, the present study provides nationally representative data on underweight and overweight/obesity in Ethiopia. The use of a standardized questionnaire is a strength of the current study as it improves the internal validity, as well as the accuracy of the estimated measure of association.

Conclusion

The present study shows that the prevalence of underweight among urban Ethiopian women improved from 23.2% in 2000 to 14.8% in 2016, while overweight/obesity prevalence increased from 10.9 to 21.4% over the same period. Key modifiable factors negatively associated with underweight included women who resided in wealthy households and never married, while the factors associated with overweight/obesity were residence in rich households and higher education attainment. Women who were informally employed and listened to the radio were less likely to be overweight/obese. Locally-relevant policy and interventions should not only target improvement in the socioeconomic status of Ethiopian women but should also focus on the education of women around the benefits of regular physical activity and healthy dietary choices.

Supplementary information

12889_2020_9345_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Characteristics of urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportions for each variable. *SNNPR: Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19.7KB, docx)

Additional file 2. Percentage point change in the prevalence of underweight by study factors, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable. *Diff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM3_ESM.docx (19.4KB, docx)

Additional file 3. Percentage point change in the prevalence of overweight/obesity by study factors, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable. *Diff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM4_ESM.docx (413.8KB, docx)

Additional file 4. Bar graphs showing trends of underweight and overweight/obesity by each study variables from 2000 to 2016.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Measure DHS, ICF International, Rockville, MD, USA, for providing the data for analysis.

Abbreviations

BMI

Body mass index

CI

Confidence interval

CSA

Central Statistics Agency

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

EA

Enumeration Areas

EDHS

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

ICF

Inner City Fund

LMICs

Lower and Middle income Countries

NCD

Non-communicable diseases

NRERC

National Research Ethics Review Committee

OR

Odds ratio

SDG

Sustainable Development Goals

SNNPR

Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Regions

USAID

United States Agency for International Development

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors’ contributions

KYA conceptualised the study, obtained and analysed the data, drafted the manuscript, interpreted the results and critically revised the manuscript. SA contributed to the conception of the idea and interpretation of the data. AP, AA, SS, FT, CN, TY, EA, DYG and AS reviewed the manuscript and provided comments during the manuscript write-up. FAO contributed to the drafting, analysis, and interpretation of the data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no grant from any funding agency in public, commercial or not for profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

The analysis was based on the datasets collected as the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey. Information on the data and content can be accessed at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The survey was conducted after ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Review Committee (NRERC) in Ethiopia. Permission from each administrative offices was granted before the surveys were conducted. During the survey, written informed consent for adults (16 years and above) and parental informed consent for those aged less than 16 years were obtained before the commencement of data collection. For this study, the dataset was obtained after online submission of the proposal to MEASURE DHS/ICF website.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”

Competing interests

FAO and AA are an Editorial Board Member (Associate Editor) of BMC Public Health. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Kedir Y. Ahmed, Email: k.ahmed@westernsydney.edu.au

Solomon Abrha, Email: abrsole2006@gmail.com.

Andrew Page, Email: a.page@westernsydney.edu.au.

Amit Arora, Email: a.arora@westernsydney.edu.au.

Solomon Shiferaw, Email: soloshi@yahoo.com.

Fentaw Tadese, Email: fentadese760@yahoo.com.

Canaan Negash Seifu, Email: 19616764@student.westernsydney.edu.au.

Tebikew Yeneabat, Email: TebikewYeneabat.Mengist@student.uts.edu.au.

Emana Alemu, Email: ema271978@gmail.com.

Delelegn Yilma Gebremichael, Email: delelegnyilma@gmail.com.

Abdulaziz Seiko, Email: Abdulaziz.Seiko@care.org.

Felix Akpojene Ogbo, Email: f.ogbo@westernsydney.edu.au.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12889-020-09345-6.

References

  • 1.Batal M, Steinhouse L, Delisle H. The nutrition transition and the double burden of malnutrition. Med Sante Trop. 2018;28(4):345–350. doi: 10.1684/mst.2018.0831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Church TS, Chaput JP, Fogelholm M, Hu G, Kuriyan R, Kurpad A, Lambert EV, Maher C, et al. The epidemiological transition and the global childhood obesity epidemic. Int J Obes Suppl. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S3–S8. doi: 10.1038/ijosup.2015.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shetty P. Nutrition transition and its health outcomes. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(1):21–27. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-0971-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organisation. The double burden of malnutrition: policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016.
  • 5.Amugsi DA, Dimbuene ZT, Mberu B, Muthuri S, Ezeh AC. Prevalence and time trends in overweight and obesity among urban women: an analysis of demographic and health surveys data from 24 African countries, 1991-2014. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lash MM, Armstrong A. Impact of obesity on women's health. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5):1712–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Must A, Naumova EN, Phillips SM, Blum M, Dawson-Hughes B, Rand WM. Childhood overweight and maturational timing in the development of adult overweight and fatness: the Newton girls study and its follow-up. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):620–627. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Himes JH. Examining the evidence for recent secular changes in the timing of puberty in US children in light of increases in the prevalence of obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;254-255:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Freire WB, Waters WF, Rivas-Marino G, Belmont P. The double burden of chronic malnutrition and overweight and obesity in Ecuadorian mothers and children, 1986-2012. Nutr Health. 2018;24(3):163–170. doi: 10.1177/0260106018782826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Whitaker RC. Predicting preschooler obesity at birth: the role of maternal obesity in early pregnancy. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):e29–e36. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bygbjerg IC. Double burden of noncommunicable and infectious diseases in developing countries. Science. 2012;337(6101):1499–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.1223466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Allen LN, Pullar J, Wickramasinghe KK, Williams J, Roberts N, Mikkelsen B, Varghese C, Townsend N. Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘best buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000535. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–1396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi M, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Overweight and obesity In: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. [Accessed 15 Aug 2019].
  • 16.Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18, crude estimates by WHO region [http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.NCDBMILT18CREGv].
  • 17.Rawal LB, Kanda K, Mahumud RA, Joshi D, Mehata S, Shrestha N, Poudel P, Karki S, Renzaho A. Prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity and their associated risk factors in Nepalese adults: data from a nationwide survey, 2016. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0205912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Biswas T, Garnett SP, Pervin S, Rawal LB. The prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity in Bangladeshi adults: data from a national survey. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kamal SM, Hassan CH, Alam GM. Dual burden of underweight and overweight among women in Bangladesh: patterns, prevalence, and sociodemographic correlates. J Health Popul Nutr. 2015;33(1):92–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ajayi IO, Adebamowo C, Adami H-O, Dalal S, Diamond MB, Bajunirwe F, Guwatudde D, Njelekela M, Nankya-Mutyoba J, Chiwanga FS, et al. Urban–rural and geographic differences in overweight and obesity in four sub-Saharan African adult populations: a multi-country cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3789-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seyda Seydel G, Kucukoglu O, Altinbasv A, Demir OO, Yilmaz S, Akkiz H, Otan E, Sowa JP, Canbay A. Economic growth leads to increase of obesity and associated hepatocellular carcinoma in developing countries. Ann Hepatol. 2016;15(5):662–672. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1212316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tebekaw Y, Teller C, Colón-Ramos U. The burden of underweight and overweight among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abrha S, Shiferaw S, Ahmed KY. Overweight and obesity and its socio-demographic correlates among urban Ethiopian women: evidence from the 2011 EDHS. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:636. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3315-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rothman KJ, Lash TL, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ethiopia sensitizes stakeholders on its new food and nutrition policy [https://www.unicef.org/ethiopia/stories/ethiopia-sensitizes-stakeholders-its-new-food-and-nutrition-policy].
  • 26.Ethiopia approves national food and nutrition policy [https://ethiopia.savethechildren.net/news/ethiopia-approves-national-food-and-nutrition-policy].
  • 27.SDG-UN . Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.World Health Organisation. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013.
  • 29.Croft TN, Marshall AMJ, Allen CK, et al. Guide to demographic and health survey statistics. Rockville: ICF; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro . Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2000. Addis Ababa and Calverton: CSA and ORC Macro; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2005. Addis Ababa and Calverton: CSA and ORC Macro; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF International . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa and Calverton: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Central Statistics Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF International . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa and Rockville: Central Statistical Agency (CSA) and ICF International; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ogbo FA, Nguyen H, Naz S, Agho KE, Page A. The association between infant and young child feeding practices and diarrhoea in Tanzanian children. Trop Med Health. 2018;46:2. doi: 10.1186/s41182-018-0084-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ogbo FA, Page A, Agho KE, Claudio F. Determinants of trends in breast-feeding indicators in Nigeria, 1999-2013. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(18):3287–3299. doi: 10.1017/S136898001500052X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ahmed KY, Page A, Arora A, Ogbo FA. Trends and determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding in Ethiopia from 2000 to 2016. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0234-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tanwi TS, Chakrabarty S, Hasanuzzaman S. Double burden of malnutrition among ever-married women in Bangladesh: a pooled analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0725-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Araujo FG, Velasquez-Melendez G, Felisbino-Mendes MS. Prevalence trends of overweight, obesity, diabetes and hypertension among Brazilian women of reproductive age based on sociodemographic characteristics. Health Care Women Int. 2019;40(4):386–406. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Doku DT, Neupane S. Double burden of malnutrition: increasing overweight and obesity and stall underweight trends among Ghanaian women. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2033-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hasan M, Sutradhar I, Shahabuddin A, Sarker M. Double burden of malnutrition among Bangladeshi women: a literature review. Cureus. 2017;9(12):e1986. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Neupane S, Prakash KC, Doku DT. Overweight and obesity among women: analysis of demographic and health survey data from 32 sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2698-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abou-ElWafa HS, El-Gilany AH. Maternal work and exclusive breastfeeding in Mansoura, Egypt. Fam Pract. 2018;36(5):568–72. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data--or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38(1):115–132. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lakew Y, Tabar L, Haile D. Socio-medical determinants of timely breastfeeding initiation in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2011 nationwide demographic and health survey. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13006-015-0050-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ogbo FA, Page A, Idoko J, Claudio F, Agho KE. Trends in complementary feeding indicators in Nigeria, 2003–2013. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Christensen DL, Eis J, Hansen AW, Larsson MW, Mwaniki DL, Kilonzo B, Tetens I, Boit MK, Kaduka L, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. Obesity and regional fat distribution in Kenyan populations: impact of ethnicity and urbanization. Ann Hum Biol. 2008;35(2):232–249. doi: 10.1080/03014460801949870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fezeu L, Minkoulou E, Balkau B, Kengne AP, Awah P, Unwin N, Alberti GK, Mbanya JC. Association between socioeconomic status and adiposity in urban Cameroon. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(1):105–111. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lopez RP. Neighborhood risk factors for obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) 2007;15(8):2111–2119. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sundquist K, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Neighbourhood deprivation and incidence of coronary heart disease: a multilevel study of 2.6 million women and men in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(1):71–77. doi: 10.1136/jech.58.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bishwajit G. Household wealth status and overweight and obesity among adult women in Bangladesh and Nepal. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3(2):185–192. doi: 10.1002/osp4.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McLaren L. Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29(1):29–48. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fernald LC. Socio-economic status and body mass index in low-income Mexican adults. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(10):2030–2042. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bhurosy T, Jeewon R. Overweight and obesity epidemic in developing countries: a problem with diet, physical activity, or socioeconomic status? ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:964236. doi: 10.1155/2014/964236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ogden CL, Fakhouri TH, Carroll MD, Hales CM, Fryar CD, Li X, Freedman DS. Prevalence of obesity among adults, by household income and education - United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(50):1369–1373. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6650a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Murakami K, Ohkubo T, Hashimoto H. Distinct association between educational attainment and overweight/obesity in unmarried and married women: evidence from a population-based study in Japan. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4912-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cohen AK, Rai M, Rehkopf DH, Abrams B. Educational attainment and obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14(12):989–1005. doi: 10.1111/obr.12062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ford ND, Patel SA, Narayan KM. Obesity in low- and middle-income countries: burden, drivers, and emerging challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:145–164. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML, Grummer-Strawn LM. Obesity in women from developing countries. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(3):247–252. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ziraba AK, Fotso JC, Ochako R. Overweight and obesity in urban Africa: a problem of the rich or the poor? BMC Public Health. 2009;9:465. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Goryakin Y, Suhrcke M. Economic development, urbanization, technological change and overweight: what do we learn from 244 demographic and health surveys? Econ Hum Biol. 2014;14:109–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Oddo VM, Bleich SN, Pollack KM, Surkan PJ, Mueller NT, Jones-Smith JC. The weight of work: the association between maternal employment and overweight in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0522-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Oddo VM, Surkan PJ, Hurley KM, Lowery C, de Ponce S, Jones-Smith JC. Pathways of the association between maternal employment and weight status among women and children: qualitative findings from Guatemala. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1):e12455. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Günther I, Launov A. Informal employment in developing countries: opportunity or last resort? J Dev Econ. 2012;97(1):88–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Frantz JM, Ngambare R. Physical activity and health promotion strategies among physiotherapists in Rwanda. Afr Health Sci. 2013;13(1):17–23. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated systematic review for the us preventive services task Force. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017. U.S. preventive services task force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ghose B. Frequency of TV viewing and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult women in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e014399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study (AusDiab) Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):369–371. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Das Gupta R, Sajal IH, Hasan M, Sutradhar I, Haider MR, Sarker M. Frequency of television viewing and association with overweight and obesity among women of the reproductive age group in Myanmar: results from a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e024680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Miles A, Rapoport L, Wardle J, Afuape T, Duman M. Using the mass-media to target obesity: an analysis of the characteristics and reported behaviour change of participants in the BBC’s ‘fighting fat, fighting fit’ campaign. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(3):357–372. doi: 10.1093/her/16.3.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wardle J, Rapoport L, Miles A, Afuape T, Duman M. Mass education for obesity prevention: the penetration of the BBC’s ‘fighting fat, fighting fit’ campaign. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(3):343–355. doi: 10.1093/her/16.3.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rai RK, Jaacks LM, Bromage S, Barik A, Fawzi WW, Chowdhury A. Prospective cohort study of overweight and obesity among rural Indian adults: sociodemographic predictors of prevalence, incidence and remission. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e021363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12889_2020_9345_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Characteristics of urban women in Ethiopia, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportions for each variable. *SNNPR: Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19.7KB, docx)

Additional file 2. Percentage point change in the prevalence of underweight by study factors, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable. *Diff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM3_ESM.docx (19.4KB, docx)

Additional file 3. Percentage point change in the prevalence of overweight/obesity by study factors, 2000–2016. n (%): weighted count and proportion for each variable. *Diff indicates the point percentage change in prevalence of underweight between 2000 to 2016.

12889_2020_9345_MOESM4_ESM.docx (413.8KB, docx)

Additional file 4. Bar graphs showing trends of underweight and overweight/obesity by each study variables from 2000 to 2016.

Data Availability Statement

The analysis was based on the datasets collected as the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey. Information on the data and content can be accessed at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES