Abstract
A new colorimetric sensor was designed for the screening pH changes in solutions, as well as, detection of some cations. The sensor preparation includes the chemical binding of alizarine red S (ARS) as a sensor of pH and cation to graphene quantum dots (GQD). Loading ARS on GQD led to the formation of water soluble sensor which finally responded to the colorimetric detection of some cations in water. Solubility and stability of the sensor in water indicate that the sensor is an ideal system for the biological and environmental applications. To demonstrate the applicability of the new sensor, the colorimetric responds of sensor were examined for some cations including Fe3+, Co2+, Ca2+, As3+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Sn2+, Al3+, and Cr3+. The colorimetric detections of all the ions were performable individually in a solution. In addition, GQD-ARS as a colorimetric sensor detected Co2+ at pH < 0.6 with limit of quantification 0.08 mM and Fe3+ at 0.6 < pH < 4.0 with limit of quantification 0.03 mM in the mixture of cations.
Subject terms: Synthesis of graphene; Environmental, health and safety issues; Quantum dots; Synthesis and processing
Introduction
Colorimetric chemosensing technique is a promising detection approach of organic and inorganic species with naked eye. Colorimetric chemosensors are test kits for onsite detection with some considerable characteristics such as fast detection, simplicity, reversibility, high selectivity, and excellent sensitivity. The pH responsive functional materials have broad applications including wearable1,2 and textilebased chemical sensors3, smart food packaging4,5, food freshness monitoring6, and non-invasive bioprocess monitoring7. Optical sensors based on fluorescence materials have attracted great attention because of advantages over conventional electrochemical approaches especially due to ease of detection by the naked eye, and high sensitivity8–10. While many optical sensors have been reported, stimuli-responsive polymer-based optical sensors11–14 including polymeric micelles15–19 and nanoparticle/polymer hybrids18,20–24 offer benefits over the classical optical sensors having fast response time and reversible changes in the conformations of the polymers. The disadvantages of these systems are the disability to sense responses over a wide range of pH and temperature, and insolublity or poor dispersion stability in aqueous media25. Optical sensor based on graphene oxide (GO) exhibits distinctive ratiometric color responses. GO has been identified as a promising sensing platform with high signal-to-noise ratio for stimuli responsive optical sensor because of its excellent potential as a highly sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) acceptor26–28. Recently, a colorimetric GO-based pH sensor was introduced that responds to a wide range of pH changes29. The system is a hybrid of responsive polymer and quantum dot (QD) integrated on a single GO sheet. Moreover, modified GOQDs–poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid hydrogels as solid sensing platform, colorimetrically detected Fe2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ in aqueous media30. Detection of cationic species is an important domain of supramolecular chemistry due to their relevance in medicinal, environmental, and biological fields31,32. Nile red dispersed on partially oxidized graphene oxide by ultrasonication selectively detected and identified Fe(III) specie with color change from purple to dark brown33.
For designing a colorimetric sensor, two or more florescent chromophores are required with ability to emmit different colors with strong luminescence. Semiconducting QDs have been used extensively for the preparation of colorimetric sensors because of their high quantum yields, size-dependent photoluminescence (PL) emissions, and multiple emissions with a single light source34–38. A number of reports with single PL intensity-based QD-anchored GO based optical sensors have been developed with sensing elements, such as chitosan, the molecular beacon, and poly(aniline)39,40. To the best of our knowledge, GQDs-based colorimetric sensors was limited to a few reports41,42. Herein we synthesized a GQD-based optical sensor with distinctive ratiometric color responses. The colorimetric GQDs-based sensors were synthesized from the chemical modification of GQDs with alizarin red S (ARS) as a chormophor. GQDs exhibit excellent solubility in aqueous media which can be useful for the ion detection in aqueous systems. While all of the previous mentioned reports are hybrid systems based on mixing various chemicals, the present report is the chemical binding ARS to GQD to achieve a new sensor.
Results and discussion
Figure 1 shows our key strategy for the synthesis of GQD-ARS as colorimetric ion sensor. The pH-responsive compound, ARS, was bonded to GQDs via activation with N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and N,N'-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP)43. ARS has active hydroxyl groups for the reaction with GQD through the esterification reaction which two products conceivable (3). The reaction of orange oil GQD with red color ARS gives dark brown powder as the GQD-ARS.
The new GQD-based sensor responded over a wide range of pH values. Three distinctive colors were observed for GQD-ARS in various screened pHs (Fig. 2), while the GQD has orange color in all pH values. GQD-ARS showed yellow color at pH < 4.0 similar to ARS (A and Aʹ in Fig. 2). With increasing pH from 4.0, the color of sensor was changed to red which attributed to the proton elemination from the sulfonic moiety (B and Bʹ in Fig. 2) which obviously demonstrated the sulfonyl group did not participate in the reaction with GQD. At pH above 11.2, proton elimination was occurred from the hydroxyl group of sensor leading to the purple color of the solution (C and Cʹ in Fig. 2).
The chemical modification of GQDs with ARS was approved with 1H NMR (Fig. 3). 1H NMR of ARS-GQD showed Ar–H which attributed to the ARS loaded on GQD. Appearance of the new signals at 7.50–7.69 and 7.87 ppms in 1H NMR spectrum of GQDs-ARS compared to GQD spectrum obviously confirmed the modification process (Fig. 3).
FT-IR spectrum of GQD-ARS indicated absorption peaks attributed to the ARS, and GQD structures. For example, the absorption bands at 1573, and 1611 cm−1 for GQD-ARS were related to C=O functionality of GQD. Although the peaks attributed to GQD on GQD-ARS were appeared in high intensity, the absorption bands of ARS on GQD-ARS revealed weakly. The peaks at 1,049, 1,180, 1,241, 1,373, and 1,481 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum of GQD-ARS are related to the ARS moiety (Fig. 4).
TEM micrgraph was prepared for GQD-ARS (Fig. 5). TEM image showed formation of very homogeneous nanoparticles of GQD with maximum size distribution between 15 and 20 nm.
While ARS has low solubility in water, GQD-ARS is soluble in water which attributed to the water solubility of GQD. Water solubility is important characteristic for a sensor, since the water soluble sensors can be used in the bio and environmental systems. Figure 6 shows the UV–Vis spectra of GQD-ARS in aqueous media (0.05 g/mL) at different pH conditions. GQD demonstrated an absorption peak at 351 nm which its intensity was increased at high pHs because of the transformation of carboxylic acids belong to GQD to carboxylates. Carboxylate groups increase the electron density on GQD due to the negative charge which leads to the easy excitation phenomenon and finally augmentation of the peak intensity. The UV–Vis spectrum of yellow solution GQD-ARS showed two absorption peaks about at 335, and 420 nm at pH below 0.6. With increasing pH, the absorption peak at 420 nm was faded and the intensity of peak at 335 nm was gradually increased. Two peaks at about 335, and 520 nm were observed at 0.6 < pH < 4.0 and the color of the solution was still remained yellow. The solution had red color at 4.0 < pH < 11.2, but the UV–Vis spectra were different below and above pH = 10. While two absorption peaks at about 335 and 520 nm were observed below pH = 10, at higher pH a new absorption peak was added at about 600 nm, the peak at 520 nm moved to about 540 nm, and the peak at about 335 nm weakened. Above pH = 11.2 the color was changed completely to purple with two peaks at about 550 nm and 600 nm. Therefore, the λmax of GQD-ARS was strongly related to the pH. The proposed structures of GQD-ARS in pH < 4.0, 4.0 < pH < 11.2, and pH > 11.2 are shown in Fig. 2. These structures are proposed based on ARS structures in various pHs.
The specific and strong interactions of ARS with metal ions as well as specific optical properties of the GQDs directed us to use GQD-ARS as a new optical sensor for metal ions detections. GQD-ARS showed pH-related colors for some of the screened metal ions, including Fe3+, Co2+, Ca2+, As3+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Sn2+, Al3+, and Cr3+ (Table 1). For this purpose, solutions with different pH values including 0.5, 3, 7, and 12 were prepared which GQD-ARS had indicated different UV–Vis spectra in these pHs. The color changes were recorded after addition of the synthesized indicator to the 0.2 mM solution of metal ions at different pH values (Table 1) regarding that the obsorved color changes were because of the complexes formations between metal ions and GQD-ARS. The results evinced that GQD-ARS is a pH-related colorimetric sensor for metal ions. The color of GQD-ARS solution in pH = 0.5 was changed from yellow to green with addition of Co2+, indicated Co2+ ions successfully formed complex with GQD-ARS. GQD-ARS showed low color changes for the Co2+ solution in pH = 3 compared to standard solution containing GQD-ARS without metal ion. Another color change to purple was observed at pH = 7 although the resulted color was similar to the color change observed for other cations. Therefore, GQD-ARS is a colorimetric sensor for the detection of Co2+ specie in solutions with pH < 0.6. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for Co2+ by naked eyes was obtained 0.08 mM in pH < 0.6.
Table 1.
Colorimetric determination of Fe3+ can be performed by GQD-ARS with the color change from yellow to purple at 0.6 < pH < 4.0. The addition of Fe3+ to GQD-ARS solution converted the color of mixture from red to dark purple. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for Fe3+ by naked eyes was obtained 0.03 mM.
GQD-ARS ability was surveyed in the selective detection of Co2+ and Fe3+ metal ions. For this purpose, two mixtures were prepared in pH = 0.5, and 3 containing all of the investigated cations and GQD-ARS was added to these mixtures. The color of the mixtures changed to green and purple, respectively. As mentioned above, Co2+ gave green color to the solution containing GQD-ARS at pH < 0.6 and also the color of ions mixture was remained green at this pH with the same absorption spectra. The color of solution in the absence of Co2+ was yellow revealing GQD-ARS ability to detect Co2+ selectively in the mixture of ions investigated here at pH < 0.6. GQD-ARS also can be used for the selective detection of Fe3+ in the presence of other mentioned metal ions at pH 3 due to the color change from yellow to purple. GQD-ARS cannot be used for the selective detection and determination of other ions since most of them gave same color to GQD-ARS containing solution. So, GQD-ARS is colorimetric responsive indicator for Co2+ and Fe3+ in a mixture of ions.
Under the optimum conditions (pH < 0.6 for Co2+ and pH = 3 for Fe3+), the colorimetric assay was processed using GQD-ARS to detect a series of Co2+ and Fe3+ solutions with concentrations greater than 1 µM. The detectios according a obvious color change from yellow to green for Co2+ and yellow to purple for Fe3+ ions were also observable by UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy. The obtained spectra for GQD, ARS and GQD-ARS in the presence of Co2+ and Fe3+ have been shown in Fig. 7.
Figure 7 confirmed the color changes of the solution and proved the ability of GQD-ARS for the detection of Co2+ and Fe3+ in the optimized pH condition. The distinctions in the absorption spectra of GQD-ARS with and without Fe3+ and Co2+ in the optimized pHs are great values. The position of maximum band, λmax, undergoes a shift which is particularly noticeable (Fig. 8) could be used for sensitive and selective detections of Fe3+ and Co2+ in the certain pH.
Under optimum condition the absorption of the solution was measured by addition different concentration of Co2+ and Fe3+ ions and results showed that (Fig. 9) there is a linear regression between absorbance and concentration in the range from 1 to 30 µM for these cations.
The obtained correlation coefficient were 0.999 and 0.998 for Co2+ and Fe3+ ions, respectively. The calculated detection limit based on signal to noise ratio (S/N = 3) was calculated to be 0.31 µM and 0.35 µM for Co2+ and Fe3+ cations. Detailed studies for the colorimetric determination of these cations using GQD-ARS are presently in progress in our laboratory and results will be reported soon.
Conclusion
A novel water-soluble sensor was synthesized through modification of GQD with ARS which characterized with common methods. While ARS is insoluble compound in water, GQD-ARS is completely soluble and can be interesting sensor in biosystems. The sensor demonstrated color change in four pH ranges including pH < 0.6, 0.6 < pH < 4.0, 4.0 < pH < 11.2, and pH > 11.2. GQD-ARS also showed great performance in the pH-related colorimetric detection of some metal ions. The sensor particularly determines Co2+ and Fe3+ in the mixture of ions.
Experimental
Materials and methods
All reagents were purchased from Merck or Aldrich and used without further purification. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to characterize different functional groups of the composite using a Jasco 6,300 FTIR instrument in the range of 600–4,000 cm−1. Transition electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs were obtained with Philips CM100 BioTWIN transmission electron microscope and TEM Philips EM 208S. 1H NMR Spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-300 Avance spectrometer 300.13 MHz; chemical shifts (δ scale) are reported in parts per million (ppm). UV–Visible spectrophotometer of Biowave II, Biochrom WPA Ltd., UK was used for preparation of absorption spectra.
Preparation of GQD-ARS
For the preparation of GQD, citric acid (2.0 g) was heated at 180 °C during 15 min to give orange oil (1.1 g) which purified with addition of 20 ml acetone and 20 ml NaOH solution (0.1 N) to the mixture and separation of oil part of the mixture44.
GQD-ARS was synthesized from stirring GQD (2.0 g), ARS (0.1 g), DCC (0.4 g), and DMAP (0.05 g) in DMSO (10 ml) at 90 °C. After 24 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, acetone (10 ml) was added to the reaction vessel, and the precipitate was filtered off. Finally, washing the obtained solids with acetone (2 × 5 ml) and drying at 60 °C gives GQD-ARS as a dark brown (1.8 g).
General procedure for the detection of ions
To a pH adjusted solution of Mx+ (5 ml, 0.2 mM) with HCl or NaOH, GQD-ARS (0.05 g) was added and the color of solution was changed immediately.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Research Council of Urmia University.
Author contributions
S.K. designed the study, prepared the material, and wrote the paper; H.A. performed the experiments and analyses; F.A. interpreted the results, and wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Curto VF, Coyle S, Byrne R, Angelov N, Diamond D, Benito-Lopez F. Concept and development of an autonomous wearable micro-fluidic platform for real time pH sweat analysis. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2012;175:263–270. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Windmiller JR, Wang J. Wearable electrochemical sensors and biosensors: A review. Electroanalysis. 2013;25:29–46. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van der Schueren L, De Clerck K. Coloration and application of pH-sensitive dyes on textile materials. Color Technol. 2012;128:82–90. [Google Scholar]
- 4.von Bultzingslowen C, et al. Sol-gel based optical carbon dioxide sensor employing dual luminophore referencing for application in food packaging technology. Analyst. 2002;127:1478–1483. doi: 10.1039/b207438a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pacquit A, Frisby J, Diamond D, Lau KT, Farrell A, Quilty B. Development of a smart packaging for the monitoring of fish spoilage. Food Chem. 2007;102:466–470. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuswandi B, Jayus Larasati TS, Abdullah A, Heng LY. Real-time monitoring of shrimp spoilage using on-package sticker sensor based on natural dye of curcumin. Food Anal. Meth. 2012;5:881–889. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mikkelsen MB, et al. Controlled deposition of sol-gel sensor material using hemiwicking. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2011;21:11. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goldsmith BR, et al. Digital biosensing by foundry-fabricated graphene sensors. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38700-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Basabe-Desmonts L, Reinhoudt DN, Crego-Calama M. Design of fluorescent materials for chemical sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:993–1017. doi: 10.1039/b609548h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Z, et al. Free radical sensors based on inner-cutting graphene field-effect transistors. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1544. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09573-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stuart MAC, et al. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:101–113. doi: 10.1038/nmat2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu J, Liu S. Responsive polymers for detection and sensing applications: Current status and future developments. Macromolecules. 2010;43:8315–8330. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pietsch C, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US. Soluble polymeric dual sensor for temperature and pH value. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:5653–5656. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu T, Zou G, Hu J, Liu S. Fabrication of photoswitchable and thermotunable multicolor fluorescent hybrid silica nanoparticles coated with dye-labeled poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Brushes. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:3788–3798. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li C, Zhang Y, Hu J, Cheng J, Liu S. Reversible three state switching of multicolor fluorescence emission by multiple stimuli modulated FRET processes within thermoresponsive polymeric micelles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:5120–5124. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar EKP, Fedborg LN, Almdal K, Andresen TL. Synthesis and characterization of a micelle-based ph nanosensor with an unprecedented broad measurement range. Chem. Mater. 2013;25:1496–1501. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee AS, Gast AP, Bütün V, Armes SP. Characterizing the structure of pH dependent polyelectrolyte block copolymer micelles. Macromolecules. 1999;32:4302–4310. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gao GH, et al. Magnetite-nanoparticle-encapsulated pH-responsive polymeric micelle as an MRI probe for detecting acidic pathologic areas. Small. 2010;6:1201–1204. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bae Y, Fukushima S, Harada A, Kataoka K. Design of environment-sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: Polymeric micelles that are responsive to intracellular pH change. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:4640–4643. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hong SH, Hong SW, Jo WH. A new polymeric pH sensor based on photophysical property of gold nanoparticle and pH sensitivity of poly(sulfadimethoxine methacrylate) Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2010;211:1054–1060. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paek K, Chung S, Cho CH, Kim BJ. Fluorescent and pH-responsive diblock copolymer-coated core shell CdSe/ZnS particles for a color-displaying, ratiometric pH sensor. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:10272–10274. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13848k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kozlovskaya V, Kharlampieva E, Chang S, Muhlbauer R, Tsukruk VV. pH-responsive layered hydrogel microcapsules as gold nanoreactors. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:2158–2167. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Medintz IL, et al. Quantum-dot/dopamine bioconjugates function as redox coupled assemblies for in vitro and intracellular pH sensing. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:676–684. doi: 10.1038/nmat2811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wencel D, Abel T, Mc Donagh C. Optical chemical pH sensors. Anal. Chem. 2014;86:15–29. doi: 10.1021/ac4035168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hong SW, Ahn CH, Huh J, Jo WH. Synthesis of a PEGylated polymeric pH sensor and its pH sensitivity by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Macromolecules. 2006;39:7694–7700. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Swathi RS, Sebastian KL. Long range resonance energy transfer from a dye molecule to graphene has (distance)−4 dependence. J. Chem. Phys. 2009;130:086101. doi: 10.1063/1.3077292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu C, Wang Z, Jia H, Li Z. Efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer between upconversion nanophosphors and graphene oxide: A highly sensitive biosensing platform. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:4661–4663. doi: 10.1039/c1cc10597c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang PJJ, Liu J. DNA-length-dependent fluorescence signaling on graphene oxide surface. Small. 2012;8:977–983. doi: 10.1002/smll.201102156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paek K, Yang H, Lee J, Park J, Kim BJ. Efficient colorimetric pH sensor based on responsive polymer quantum dot integrated graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2014;8:2848–2856. doi: 10.1021/nn406657b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baruah U, Chowdhury D. Functionalized graphene oxide quantum dot-PVA hydrogel: A colorimetric sensor for Fe2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ ions. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:145501. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/14/145501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carter PK, Young AM, Palmer AE. Fluorescent sensors for measuring metal ions in living systems. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4564–4601. doi: 10.1021/cr400546e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen G, Guo Z, Zeng G, Tang L. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for environmental mercury detection. Analyst. 2015;140:5400–5443. doi: 10.1039/c5an00389j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sadak O, Sundramoorthy AK, Gunasekaran S. Highly selective colorimetric and electrochemical sensing of iron (III) using nile red functionalized graphene film. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.04.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shirasaki Y, Supran GJ, Bawendi MG, Bulovic V. Emergence of colloidal quantum-dot light-emitting technologies. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:13–23. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sukhovatkin V, Hinds S, Brzozowski L, Sargent EH. Colloidal quantum-dot photodetectors exploiting multiexciton generation. Science. 2009;324:1542–1544. doi: 10.1126/science.1173812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Geyer SM, Scherer JM, Moloto N, Jaworski FB, Bawendi MG. Efficient luminescent down-shifting detectors basedon colloidal quantum dots for dual-band detection applications. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5566–5571. doi: 10.1021/nn2010238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Murray CB, Norris DJ, Bawendi MG. Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E=S, Se, Te) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:8706–8715. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science. 1996;271:933–937. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dong H, Gao W, Yan F, Ji H, Ju H. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer between quantum dots and graphene oxide for sensing biomolecules. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:5511–5517. doi: 10.1021/ac100852z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang T, et al. Enhanced electrochemiluminescence of CdSe quantum dots composited with graphene oxide and chitosan for sensitive sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012;31:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mandal D, Khatun S, Gupta AN, Chandra A. DNA supported graphene quantum dots for Ag ion sensing. Nanotechnology. 2019;30:255501. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab084c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ju J, Chen W. Graphene quantum dots as fluorescence probes for sensing metal ions: Synthesis and applications. Curr. Org. Chem. 2015;19:1150–1162. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Keshipour S, Adak A. Pd(0) Supported on N-doped graphene quantum dot modified cellulose as an efficient catalyst for the green reduction of nitroaromatics. RSC Adv. 2016;6:89407–89412. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dong Y, et al. Blue luminescent graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide prepared by tuning the carbonization degree of citric acid. Carbon. 2012;50:4738–4743. [Google Scholar]