Skip to main content
EFSA Journal logoLink to EFSA Journal
. 2020 Mar 3;18(3):e06052. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6052

Statement on the dietary exposure assessment for the temporary maximum residue levels for chlordecone in certain products of animal origin

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
PMCID: PMC7447898  PMID: 32874264

Abstract

In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Commission requested EFSA to carry out a consumer exposure assessment in relation to the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for chlordecone in products of animal origin recommended by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) in an assessment performed in 2018. The MRL proposals under assessment are lower than the current EU MRLs established under Regulation (EC) 396/2005. The dietary exposure calculations performed by EFSA demonstrated that the short‐term and the long‐term intake of chlordecone residues at the level of the proposed MRLs for animal products under assessment is not expected to exceed the toxicological reference values derived by the French authorities.

Keywords: chlordecone, animal commodities, livestock, pesticide, MRL, exposure assessment

1. Introduction and background information

Chlordecone is an organochlorine compound with insecticidal activity that has been widely used in French Antilles.

Common name Chlordecone
IUPAC perchloropentacyclo[5.3.0.02,6.03,9.04,8]decan‐5‐one
CAS 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6‐decachlorooctahydro‐2H‐1,3,4‐(methanetriyl)cyclobuta[cd]pentalen‐2‐one
Other names Kepone, Merex
CAS number 143‐50‐0
CIPAC Code 297
Molecular formula C10Cl10O
Molecular weight 490.633
Structural formula graphic file with name EFS2-18-e06052-g002.jpg

Chlordecone has been banned in 2004 for being used in plant protection products (Commission Regulation (EC) No 850/20041).

Chlordecone is listed in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention (decision SC‐4/12). Due to its high persistence, chlordecone is still present in the environment, and leads to contamination of food produced in contaminated areas. It has a tendency to accumulate in the food chain, leading to residues in animal products.

The current EU maximum residue levels (MRLs) for chlordecone are established in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 396/20052. The residues are labelled in the MRL legislation as being fat soluble.

On 12 July 2019, the French competent authorities notified to the European Commission two emergency measures, which had been taken at national level pursuant to Article 53 of Regulation (EC) 178/2002.3 Following the opinions of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), France had fixed new national maximum residues levels (MRLs) for chlordecone in bovine, ovine, caprine, porcine and poultry matrices (Table 1) at lower values than the ones currently applicable under Regulation (EC) 396/2005 to ensure the protection of consumers of Guadeloupe and Martinique (ANSES, 2018b, 2019).

Table 1.

Existing EU MRLs and new French MRL proposals for chlordecone in animal matrices

Code number Groups and examples of individual products to which the MRLs apply Reg. (EC) No 839/2008 mg/kg French MRL proposals derived by ANSESa (mg/kg)
1000000 PRODUCTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN ‐ TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS
1010000 Commodities from
1011000 (a) Swine 0.1 0.02
1011010 Muscle 0.1 0.02
1011020 Fat 0.1 0.02
1011030 Liver 0.1 0.02
1011040 Kidney 0.1 0.02
1011050 Edible offals (other than liver and kidney) 0.1 0.02
1011990 Other tissues (swine) 0.1 0.02
1012000 (b) Bovine 0.1
1012010 Muscle 0.1 0.02
1012020 Fat 0.1 0.03
1012030 Liver 0.1 0.02
1012040 Kidney 0.1 0.02
1012050 Edible offals (other than liver and kidney) 0.1 0.02
1012990 Other tissues (bovine) 0.1 0.02
1013000 (c) Sheep 0.1 0.02
1013010 Muscle 0.1 0.02
1013020 Fat 0.1 0.02
1013030 Liver 0.1 0.02
1013040 Kidney 0.1 0.02
1013050 Edible offals (other than liver and kidney) 0.1 0.02
1013990 Other tissues (sheep) 0.1 0.02
1014000 (d) Goat 0.1 0.02
1014010 Muscle 0.1 0.02
1014020 Fat 0.1 0.02
1014030 Liver 0.1 0.02
1014040 Kidney 0.1 0.02
1014050 Edible offals (other than liver and kidney) 0.1 0.02
1014990 Other tissues (goat) 0.1 0.02
1016000 (f) Poultry 0.2 0.02
1016010 Muscle 0.2 0.02
1016020 Fat 0.2 0.02
1016030 Liver 0.2 0.02
1016040 Kidney 0.2 0.02
1016050 Edible offals (other than liver and kidney) 0.2 0.02
1016990 Other tissues (poultry) 0.2 0.02
a

The values recommended by ANSES (2018b, 2019) were rounded according to the guidelines on the OECD MRL calculation.

Toxicological reference values were established by ANSES in a previous assessment (ANSES, 2018a), where ANSES proposed an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.0005 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day and an acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.01 mg/kg bw. No toxicological reference values are established at European level.

2. Terms of reference as provided by the European Commission

On 17 October 2019, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) received a request from the European Commission4 to carry out a consumer exposure assessment in relation to the MRLs recommended by ANSES in the relevant opinions.

EFSA accepted the mandate and included it in the EFSA Register of Questions with the reference number EFSA‐Q‐2019‐00665.

2.1. Interpretation of the Terms of Reference

As requested in the mandate, EFSA focussed in this statement on the dietary exposure assessment for the MRL proposals derived by ANSES for animal tissues, which are reported in Table 1. Considering the current risk management practice of extrapolating MRLs to other animal species, EFSA performed the dietary risk assessment also for food products (edible tissues) of equine and other farmed animals using the MRL proposal of 0.02 mg/kg.

EFSA used the toxicological reference values derived by ANSES (ANSES, 2018a). EFSA did not assess the toxicological reference values derived by the French authorities, as this was not requested in the mandate.

It was also clarified by the requestor that plant products should not be taken into account in the exposure calculations and that the mandate does not request EFSA to re‐assess the scientific basis for the MRL proposals derived by ANSES.

3. Assessment

The consumer exposure assessment was performed using the revision 3.1 of the EFSA Pesticide Residues Intake Model (PRIMo). This dietary exposure assessment model contains the relevant European food consumption data for different subgroups of the EU population (EFSA, 2019, 2018). The exposure calculations were performed with the MRL proposals reported in Table 1. For bovine meat, the input values were calculated, assuming meat being a mixture of 20% fat and 80% muscle; hence the exposure calculations were performed with a chlordecone concentration of 0.022 mg/kg in meat.

3.1. Acute (short‐term) exposure assessment

The estimated short‐term exposure calculated for children accounted for up to 3% of the ARfD. The highest exposure was identified for poultry meat. For adults, the exposure was slightly lower (2% of the ARfD for poultry meat). More detailed results can be found in Appendix A. The acute exposure assessment reflects the assumption that a large portion of the food product under assessment containing residues at the proposed MRL is consumed by European consumers.

3.2. Chronic (long‐term) exposure assessment

The results of the chronic exposure assessment are also reported in Appendix A. The highest total exposure resulting from all animal products under assessment accounted for a maximum of 19% of the ADI (Swedish general population).

Among the individual products, bovine meat was the main contributor in most of the diets (19% of the ADI), followed by swine meat (9% of the ADI) and poultry meat (6% of the ADI).

It should be highlighted that in accordance with internationally agreed methodologies, the calculation of the long‐term exposure is usually performed with a median residue concentration expected in the food products consumed, while in the given case the calculations were performed with the MRL, which is considered as a very conservative approach leading to an overestimation of the exposure. However, in the current calculation the contribution of other products with chlordecone contamination (e.g. milk, eggs, plant products, fish) was not taken into account. Hence, the chronic exposure assessment is indicative only and risk managers need to be aware of these limitations when interpreting the results.

The exposure calculations using EFSA PRIMo model 3.1, together with the opinions issued by ANSES (ANSES, 2018a,b, 2019) are considered as supporting documents to this statement.

4. Conclusion

The dietary exposure calculations performed by EFSA demonstrated that the short‐term and the long‐term intake of chlordecone residues at the level of the proposed MRLs for animal products under assessment is not expected to exceed the toxicological reference values derived by the French authorities. It is highlighted that the chronic exposure assessment is considered indicative, since realistic estimates for the expected residue concentrations in all food products that may contribute to the overall dietary exposure of chlordecone are currently not available.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 16(1)(a) and Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 temporary MRLs for pesticide residues that are the result of environmental contamination such as chlordecone should be regularly reassessed, taking into account results from pesticide monitoring programmes, since contamination of food is expected to gradually decrease over time.

Abbreviations

ADI

acceptable daily intake

ANSES

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety

ARfD

acute reference dose

bw

body weight

CAS

Chemical Abstract Service

CIPAC

Collaborative International Pesticide Analytical Council

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

IEDI

international estimated daily intake

IESTI

international estimated short‐term intake

IUPAC

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

JMPR

Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues

LOQ

limit of quantification

MRL

maximum residue level

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development

PRIMo

(EFSA) Pesticide Residues Intake Model

RA

risk assessment

RD

residue definition

TMDI

theoretical maximum daily intake

WHO

World Health Organization

Appendix A – Pesticide Residue Intake Model (PRIMo)

1.

1.

Suggested citation: EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2020. Statement on the dietary exposure assessment for the temporary maximum residue levels for chlordecone in certain products of animal origin. EFSA Journal 2020;18(3):6052, 9 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6052

Requestor: European Commission

Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2019‐00665

Approved: 13 February 2020

Notes

1

Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC. OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p 7–49.

2

Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. OJ L 70, 16.03.2005, p 1–16.

3

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p 1–24.

4

“Request of a scientific opinion reviewing the temporary MRLs for chlordecone in certain animal products” ARES (2019) 6431000.

References

  1. ANSES (French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety), 2018a. AVIS de l'Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES) relatif à l'actualisation des données d'exposition par voie alimentaire afin d’évaluer les risques des populations antillaises et émettre des recommandations de consommation dans le cadre du projet Kannari «Santé, nutrition et exposition à la chlordecone aux Antilles» et aux limites maximales de résidus (LMR) pour la chlordecone (2014‐SA‐0I09 and 2017‐SA‐0029). May 2018. Available online: https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/ERCA2017SA0029.pdf
  2. ANSES (French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety), 2018b. Note d'appui scientifique et technique de l'Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES) relative à la fixation d'une limite maximale de résidus de chlordecone dans la graisse pour les denrées carnées (2018‐SA‐0202). September 2018. Available online: https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/ERCA2018SA0202.pdf
  3. ANSES (French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety), 2019. Avis de l'Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES) relative à la fixation d'une limite maximale de résidus de chlordecone dans les muscles et dans la graisse pour les denrées carnées (2018‐SA‐0265). March 2019. Available online. https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/ERCA2018SA0265.pdf
  4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Brancato A, Brocca D, Ferreira L, Greco L, Jarrah S, Leuschner R, Medina P, Miron I, Nougadere A, Pedersen R, Reich H, Santos M, Stanek A, Tarazona J, Theobald A and Villamar‐Bouza L, 2018. Guidance on use of EFSA Pesticide Residue Intake Model (EFSA PRIMo revision 3). EFSA Journal 2018;16(1):5147, 43 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2019. Pesticide Residue Intake Model‐ EFSA PRIMo revision 3.1. EFSA supporting publication 2019;16(3):EN‐1605, 15 pp. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from EFSA Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES