Skip to main content
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology logoLink to Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
. 2020 Jul 14;7(8):1429–1435. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51062

Whole‐exome and HLA sequencing in Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome

Ingo Helbig 1,2,3,4,, Giulia Barcia 5,6,7, Manuela Pendziwiat 8, Shiva Ganesan 1,2,3, Stefanie H Mueller 9,10, Katherine L Helbig 1,2,3, Priya Vaidiswaran 1,2,4, Julie Xian 3, Peter D Galer 1,2,3, Zaid Afawi 11,12,13, Nicola Specchio 14, Gerhard Kluger 15,16, Gregor Kuhlenbäumer 10, Silke Appenzeller 17, Michael Wittig 18, Uri Kramer 19,20, Andreas van Baalen 8,a, Rima Nabbout 5,6,21,a; FIRES Genetics Study Group
PMCID: PMC7448193  PMID: 32666661

Abstract

Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a devastating epilepsy characterized by new‐onset refractory status epilepticus with a prior febrile infection. We performed exome sequencing in 50 individuals with FIRES, including 27 patient–parent trios and 23 single probands, none of whom had pathogenic variants in established genes for epilepsies or neurodevelopmental disorders. We also performed HLA sequencing in 29 individuals with FIRES and 529 controls, which failed to identify prominent HLA alleles. The genetic architecture of FIRES is substantially different from other developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, and the underlying etiology remains elusive, requiring novel approaches to identify the underlying causative factors.

Introduction

Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a severe epileptic encephalopathy with new‐onset super‐refractory status epilepticus that presents with a febrile illness prior to seizure onset. 1 Status epilepticus in individuals with FIRES is highly refractory, and, even though a cytokine‐mediated mechanism has been proposed, the pathophysiology remains entirely unknown. 2 , 3 FIRES shares many clinical features with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE). Over the last two decades, genetic studies have identified the underlying cause of many previously poorly understood epilepsy syndromes, including disease‐causing SCN1A variants in up to 90% of individuals with Dravet Syndrome 4 and disease‐causing KCNT1 variants in a significant fraction of individuals with epilepsy with migrating focal seizures. 5 Genetic testing has become a common diagnostic modality and is routinely performed in children and adults with DEE. The diagnostic yield is considered 15–20% 6 , 7 and reaches up to 50% in individuals with neonatal epileptic encephalopathies, 8 largely due to de novo variants in genes encoding ion channels or synaptic proteins.

Ever since its initial description in 2010, 1 the cause of Febrile Infection‐Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES) has been a matter of debate. Given the absence of otherwise explanatory factors, two avenues of research have been pursued to better understand the underlying disease mechanism, including (1) the identification and delineation of a potentially dysregulated immune response and (2) genetic studies in parallel to genetic investigations in other nonlesional epilepsies. While studies into the disease mechanism have recently focused on a dysregulation of the IL1 response 9 with reports suggesting a promising therapeutic effect of anakinra, 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 the primary cause leading to this response is unknown.

Given the suspicion of an underlying genetic cause, multiple studies over the last decade have assessed the role of genetic factors in FIRES (detailed in Supplementary Information). However, excluding individuals subsequently included in our study, we only identified less than 30 individuals with FIRES reported to have undergone sequencing for candidate genes, gene panel analysis, or whole exome sequencing in these studies. A subset of studies reported alleged genetic findings in FIRES. By current diagnostic criteria, however, none of the findings would be considered explanatory.

FIRES is extremely rare with less than 50 new cases in the United States every year. Accordingly, assembling patient cohorts is challenging. We therefore established an international study to perform exome sequencing in individuals with FIRES. We reasoned that, in parallel to DEE, autism, and other neurodevelopmental disorders, the genetic basis of FIRES can be identified through a modern next‐generation sequencing approach.

Patients and Methods

Subjects

We included a cohort of 50 individuals with FIRES from centers in Kiel, Germany (n = 30), Paris, France (n = 9), Israel (n = 7), Italy (n = 2), and the US (n = 2) for the current study. The diagnosis of FIRES was confirmed by two senior physicians (A.v.B., R.N.) based on consensus criteria, 14 and standardized phenotyping was obtained for all individuals. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Kiel, Germany, Hôpital Necker‐Enfants Malades, Paris, France, and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Exome sequencing and HLA sequencing

Exome sequencing was performed for patient–parent trios and singletons at four sites. Of these, 18 individuals were sequenced at Broad institute with Nextera Rapid Capture Exome kit through the Epi25 Project, 13 individuals at Cologne Center for Genomics with Agilent Technologies SureSelect V6 R2 kit, 11 individuals at Institut Imagine, Paris with Agilent Technologies 50 V5 kit, and 6 individuals with Truseq Exome Enrichment kit at the Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology (ICMB), Kiel. Molecular HLA typing was performed at ICMB using a targeted NGS method as previously reported. 15

Bioinformatic analysis for exome and HLA sequencing

Exome data were analyzed through a bioinformatic pipeline as previously described. 16 , 17 Analysis for pathogenic variants in genetic etiologies for human epilepsies was performed according to criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). 18 HLA imputation was performed using HLAscan, including 29 cases and 529 controls of European ancestry. Using PyHLA, significant HLA associations were tested under an additive allelic model, 19 correcting for multiple testing using the Benjamini‐Hochberg FDR method.

Selection of FIRES candidate genes

In trio whole‐exome data, we selected (a) de novo, X‐linked, and bi‐allelic variants absent in population databases. For both trio and singleton exome data, we further identified (b) ClinVar pathogenic variants, 20 (c) nonpopulation variants in 101 epilepsy‐related genes, (d) Protein Truncating Variants (PTV) in genes resistant to loss‐of‐function variation (pLI score > 0.95), 21 and (e) deleterious missense variants (CADD score > 20) within constrained coding regions (CCR > 95th percentile). 22 The selection strategy for these candidate genes is further outlined in the Supplementary Information.

Results

Spectrum of clinical features

Our cohort included 17 females and 33 males (clinical features are shown in Table S1). In brief, three individuals (F3, F44, and F51) had prior febrile seizures, but none of the individuals had epilepsy diagnosed prior to the onset of FIRES. Median age of onset of the acute phase was 6 years (range 2–15 years). EEGs performed in the acute phase showed epileptiform activity in 41/50, mostly multifocal discharges arising bilaterally from the frontal and temporal regions. Developmental outcome was documented in 49/50 individuals, including 11/49 with mild, 18/49 with moderate, and 13/49 with severe intellectual disability. Seven individuals had resolution of FIRES without intellectual deficits. 44/47 individuals with documented development prior to seizure onset did not have developmental concerns, the remaining three individuals had anxiety and obsessive‐compulsive disorder (F11), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, F14), and language delay (F43).

Exome sequencing

Known genetic etiologies in human epilepsies

None of the 50 individuals had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in known genetic etiologies for human epilepsies. The 27 patient–parent trios were further analyzed for de novo, X‐linked, and bi‐allelic variants absent in population databases (Table 1). No gene was found to be affected by a de novo variant or bi‐allelic variants in two or more individuals. The only known variant in a gene related to human epilepsies was a previously reported de novo c.G1117A (p.E373K) variant in DNM1 in F26. 23 However, as this variant in DNM1 occurred outside the typical mutation cluster and the presentation was incompatible with the typical phenotype, it remained of uncertain significance. We next analyzed a virtual panel of 101 curated epilepsy‐related genes that are typically analyzed in a diagnostic context (Table S2). This analysis identified a total of seven variants absent in population databases, including two variants in KCNQ3 (F38 and F28) and one variant in SCN2A (F29). The KCNQ3 variant in F38 was paternally inherited and parental testing was not available for F28. Both these KCNQ3 variants occurred in the C‐terminal end, where population variants in this gene are common and hence, a profound effect on protein function is unlikely. The variant c.A2851G (p.M951V) in SCN2A occurred close to the selectivity filter, paralogous to SCN1A variants observed in Dravet Syndrome. 24 However, the variant in F29 was inherited from an unaffected father and is not considered explanatory for the individual’s epilepsy. All other nonpopulation variants in epilepsy genes occurred in genes incompatible with the FIRES phenotype. The analysis of ClinVar pathogenic variants identified a reported pathogenic variant in FOXP2 (p.Q175delinsQQQQQ) in F47, a known genetic etiology for speech disorders. As this variant was inherited from an unaffected father, we consider it noncontributory to the FIRES phenotype.

Table 1.

Candidate variants in FIRES.

ID Test Inheritance Gene Variant (c./p.) Protein name Transcripts
Variants with monogenic inheritance
F17 Trio de novo NPY2R c.A52G;p.K18E Neuropeptide y receptor y2 NM_000910.3
F23 Trio de novo MYO1D c.A1348G;p.K450E Myosin ID NM_001303279.1
F23 Trio de novo UNC50 c.582dupA;p.G194fs Unc‐50 Inner nuclear membrane RNA binding protein NM_001330353.1
F23 Trio de novo SPICE1 c.G1540C;p.D514H Spindle‐ and centriole‐associated protein 1 NM_001331078.1
F32 Trio de novo NAV1 c.G982A;p.G328S Neuron navigator 1 NM_020443.4
F7 Trio de novo LRIF1 c.C1585T;p.Q529X Ligand‐dependent nuclear receptor‐interacting factor 1 NM_018372.3
F8 Trio Compound UNC79 c.G4087T;p.V1363L c.C4654A;p.L1552I Unc79 homolog, NALCN channel complex subunit NM_001346218.1
F29 Trio de novo KDM2B c.G3172A;p.V1058I Lysine‐specific demethylase 2b NM_001005366.1
F32 Trio Compound KIAA0586 c.137delG;p.R46fs c.1793_1794del; p.E598fs KIAA0586 protein NM_001244191.1
F26 Single de novo 1 DNM1 c.G1117A;p.E373K Dynamin 1 NM_004408.2
ClinVar pathogenic variants for neurological disorders
F27 Single Unknown SPG7 c.C1369T;p.R457X Paraplegin (Hereditary spastic paraplegia) NM_003119.3
F47 Trio Paternal FOXP2 c.525_526insCAGCAG CAACAA; p.Q175delinsQQQQQ Forkhead box protein p2 (Speech‐language disorder‐1) NM_148900.3
F17 Trio Maternal POLG c.G1399A;p.A467T DNA Polymerase Gamma, Catalytic Subunit (Leigh Syndrome) NM_001126131.1
F30 Trio Paternal CAPN3 c.549delA;p.P183fs Calpain 3 (Limb‐girdle muscular dystrophy) NM_000070.2
Variants in genetic etiologies for epilepsy absent in gnomAD database
F35 Single Unknown GNAO1 c.A425C;p.N142T G Protein Subunit Alpha O1 NM_020988.2
F38 Single Homozygous LGI1 c.A615T;p.E205D Leucine‐rich gene, glioma‐inactivated, 1 NM_001308275.1
F38 Single Paternal KCNQ3 c.G1898A;p.G633E Potassium Voltage‐Gated Channel Subfamily Q Member 3 NM_004519.3
F38 Single Unknown ARX c.G503A;p.S168N Aristaless‐related homeobox NM_139058.2
F27 Single Unknown ALG13 c.C905T;p.A302V UDP‐N‐Acetylglucosaminyl‐transferase NM_001257230.1
F28 Single Unknown KCNQ3 c.G1854A;p.M618I Potassium Voltage‐Gated Channel Subfamily Q Member 3 NM_004519.3
F29 Trio Paternal SCN2A c.A2851G;p.M951V Sodium channel, voltage‐gated, type ii, alpha subunit NM_001040143.1
1

Previously published as de novo 23 .

Candidate variants and Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis

We identified de novo variants absent in population databases in NPY2R, MYO1D, UNC50, SPICE1, NAV1, and LRIF1. None of these genetic etiologies are established in neurodevelopmental disorders or epilepsy, but occur in brain‐expressed genes intolerant to mutation, including genes implicated in brain development (NPY2R, UNC50, NAV1, Supplementary Information). We further assessed potential candidate variants by identifying protein‐truncating variants in genes resistant to loss‐of‐function variation and missense variants in genomic regions devoid of variation. We identified a total of seven protein truncating variants and 10 missense variants (Table 2). None of the implicated genes are established causes for neurological disease. Analysis of copy number variations from exome sequences did not identify pathogenic deletions or duplications (Supplementary Information).

Table 2.

Qualifying protein‐truncating variants and missense variants in FIRES.

ID Test Inheritance Gene Variant (c./p.) Protein name Transcripts
Protein‐truncating variants (PTV) with pLI > 0.95
F41 Single Unknown TBX1 c.1065_1066del; p.P355fs T‐Box Transcription Factor 1 NM_080646.1
F33 Single Unknown GNAS c.G29A;p.W10X Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein, Alpha Stimulating Activity Polypeptide 1 NM_016592.3
F34 Single Unknown WWP2 c.G403T;p.G135X NEDD4‐Like E3 Ubiquitin‐Protein Ligase WWP2 NM_001270454.1
F51 Trio Paternal JAKMIP1 c.G2053T;p.E685X Janus Kinase and Microtubule Interacting Protein 1 NM_001099433.1
F1 Trio Maternal HSP90AB1 c.2172_2176del; p.D724fs Heat Shock Protein 90kDa Alpha (Cytosolic), Class B Member 1 NM_001271969.1
F30 Trio Maternal BRD1 c.1412delA; p.D471fs Bromodomain‐containing protein 1 NM_001349940.1
F30 Trio Maternal ITGB8 c.C208T;p.Q70X Integrin, beta‐8 NM_002214.2
Missense with phred‐scaled CADD score > 20 and conserved coding region (CCR) percentile > 90
F35 Single Unknown ABCB6 c.A2175C;p.K725N Phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class X protein NM_001349828.1
F35 Single Unknown MGAT4D c.T919A;p.F307I Mannosyl (Alpha‐1,3‐)‐Glycoprotein Beta‐1,4‐N‐Acetylglucosaminyltransferase Family, Member D NM_001277353.1
F38 Single Unknown DIP2C c.C3183G;p.H1061Q Disco‐interacting protein 2 homolog C NM_014974.2
F22 Single Unknown NDUFAB1 c.A1C;p.M1L NADH‐ubiquinone oxidoreductase 1 alpha/beta subcomplex, 1 NM_005003.2
F27 Single Unknown BCAS4 c.G619A;p.A207T Breast carcinoma amplified sequence 4 NM_017843.4
F46 Single Unknown RC3H2 c.G3164C;p.R1055T Ring finger and CCCH‐type zinc finger domains‐containing protein 2 NM_001100588.1
F31 Trio Maternal CDKN2AIP c.C1708T;p.P570S Cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor 2A‐interacting protein NM_017632.3
F48 Trio Maternal HIST2H2AB c.C222G;p.N74K Histone gene cluster 2, H2A histone family, Member B NM_175065.2
F7 Trio Paternal GHRH c.A164C;p.Q55P Growth hormone‐releasing hormone NM_001184731.2
F42 Single Unknown SLC25A1 c.526 + 1G>A Solute Carrier Family 25 (Mitochondrial Carrier; Citrate Transporter), Member 1 NM_005984.4

HLA sequencing

We performed HLA sequencing in 29 individuals and compared allelic associations with 529 population controls. We did not identify a prominent HLA allele but found tentative associations with HLA‐C*07:01 [OR 8.7, 95% CI 3.55–21.30], HLA‐A*02:05 [OR 12.99, 95% CI 3.56–47.39], and HLA*A: 03:01 [OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01–0.77]. Given the lack of a consistent HLA signature, we consider these results inconclusive. None of the identified HLA associations have previously been reported in other disorders.

Discussion

In our study, we aimed to identify the genetic basis of FIRES using whole exome sequencing, reasoning that the clinical features are related to developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) where genetic causes are routinely identified. None of the individuals with FIRES had explanatory variants in known genetic etiologies for epilepsies or neurodevelopmental disorders. Even though we identified several variants of uncertain significance in known epilepsy‐related genes and potential candidate genes, none of the identified variants were considered disease‐causing.

In our study, we do not observe the same rate of pathogenic variants in established epilepsy genes that we would expect in an equally‐sized cohort of individuals with DEE, such as Infantile Spasms or Lennox‐Gastaut Syndrome where the diagnostic rate is 15% or higher. Assuming a comparable diagnostic rate for FIRES, we would have expected at least three individuals with pathogenic variants, allowing for the conclusion that the rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in known epilepsy genes in FIRES is low (95% CI 0–0.09 for variant frequency in 0/50 individuals; P = 0.006 for null probability of 0.15, see Supplementary Information). Status epilepticus in FIRES is preceded by a mild febrile illness, 14 , 25 suggesting a possible immune or inflammatory mechanism. None of the candidate genes identified in our study are implicated in human immunological disorders, and HLA sequencing failed to identify a strong disease association. Tentative associations with HLA‐C*07:01, HLA‐A*02:05, and HLA‐A*03:01 were nonexplanatory. We cannot exclude that inherited variants, including the rare variants identified in our analysis, may contribute to the risk of FIRES. However, given the low frequency of FIRES and the small sample size, we are currently unable to make a definite statement about the role of both rare and common genetic variants in the etiology of FIRES.

Our study highlights that known genetic causes for epilepsy are not common in FIRES, which may be important in a diagnostic setting. Even though individuals with FIRES will continue to undergo a genetic work‐up, our data does not provide a rationale for prioritizing genetic studies over other diagnostic modalities. Likewise, our data advocates against withholding specific anti‐seizure medications based on genetic considerations, including a reluctance to use sodium channel blockers or valproic acid due to concerns for an underlying sodium channelopathy or POLG‐related disorder. Examining non‐genetic contributors or genetic mechanisms not covered by exome sequencing will be critical for future research, including the analysis of repeat expansions or non‐coding regions that are increasingly recognized in neurological disorders.

FIRES Genetics Study Group

Joel Fluss1, Andre Franke2, Martin Häusler3, Wolfgang Lieb4, Eiko Nausch5, Annika Rademacher5, Malte Ziemann6

1Pediatric Neurology Unit, Geneva Children's Hospital, Genève, Switzerland

2Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian‐Albrechts‐University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany

3Division of Neuropediatrics and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

4Institute of Epidemiology and Biobank PopGen, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

5Department of Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig‐Holstein, Christian Albrechts University Kiel, Germany

6Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Lübeck‐ Kiel, Germany

Author Contributions

I.H., A.v.B., and R.N. conceptualized and designed the study. I.H., U.K., Z.A., N.S., A.v.B., and R.N. contributed clinical patients to the study. M.P., S.A., and G.K. performed genetic studies including Sanger sequencing, G.B., M.P., S.A., S.G., K.L.H. and J.X. performed exome data analysis, S.H.M. and M.W. performed analysis of HLA sequencing data. I.H., P.V., G.K., U.K., A.v.B., and R.N. performed phenotype analysis. I.H., S.G., and P.D.G. drafted the publication, which was reviewed and edited by all authors.

Conflict of Interest

Nothing to report.

Supporting information

Table S1. Clinical characteristics in individuals with FIRES.

Table S2. Gene list for virtual epilepsy gene panel.

Table S3. Comparison of virtual gene panel content to epilepsy gene panel studies in the literature.

Table S4. Significant associations between HLA alleles and FIRES.

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants and their family members for taking part in the study. We would like to thank Mahgenn Cosico, Sarah E. McKeown, and Eryn Fitch for their support in enrolling research participants and administrative assistance. This work was supported by intramural funds of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia through the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN), the German Research Foundation (HE5415/3‐1 to I.H.) within the EuroEPINOMICS framework of the European Science Foundation, the German Research Foundation (DFG, HE5415/5‐1, HE5415/6‐1 to I.H.), and by DFG Research Unit FOR2715 (HE5415/7‐1 to I.H.). The project was further supported by the Center Without Walls on ion channel function in epilepsy (“Channelopathy‐associated Research Center”) by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54 NS108874). R.N. was supported by State funding from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in France under the “Investissements d’avenir” program (ANR‐10‐IAHU‐01) and the Fondation Bettencourt Schueller. We thank the Epi25 principal investigators and all of the patients with epilepsy who participated in the study for making possible this global collaboration to advance epilepsy genetics research. This work is part of the Centers for Common Disease Genomics (CCDG) program, funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). CCDG‐funded Epi25 research activities at the Broad Institute, including genomic data generation in the Broad Genomics Platform, are supported by NHGRI grant UM1 HG008895 (PIs: Eric Lander, Stacey Gabriel, Mark Daly, Sekar Kathiresan). The Genome Sequencing Program efforts were also supported by NHGRI grant 5U01HG009088‐02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute for supporting the genomic data generation efforts. We also thank the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and the groups that provided exome and genome variant data to this resource.

Funding Information

This work was supported by intramural funds of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia through the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN) and the Center Without Walls (“Channelopathy‐associated Research Center”) by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54 NS108874). Further funding information is listed in the Acknowledgements.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant U54 NS108874.

References

  • 1. van Baalen A, Hausler M, Boor R, et al. Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): a nonencephalitic encephalopathy in childhood. Epilepsia 2010;51:1323–1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van Baalen A, Hausler M, Plecko‐Startinig B, et al. Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome without detectable autoantibodies and response to immunotherapy: a case series and discussion of epileptogenesis in FIRES. Neuropediatrics 2012;43:209–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Appenzeller S, Helbig I, Stephani U, et al. Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is not caused by SCN1A, POLG, PCDH19 mutations or rare copy number variations. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012;54:1144–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Claes L, Del‐Favero J, Ceulemans B, et al. De novo mutations in the sodium‐channel gene SCN1A cause severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:1327–1332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Barcia G, Fleming MR, Deligniere A, et al. De novo gain‐of‐function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy. Nat Genet 2012;44:1255–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lindy AS, Stosser MB, Butler E, et al. Diagnostic outcomes for genetic testing of 70 genes in 8565 patients with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Epilepsia 2018;59:1062–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Truty R, Patil N, Sankar R, et al. Possible precision medicine implications from genetic testing using combined detection of sequence and intragenic copy number variants in a large cohort with childhood epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2019;4:397–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Helbig KL, Farwell Hagman KD, Shinde DN, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing provides a molecular diagnosis for a significant proportion of patients with epilepsy. Genet Med 2016;18:898–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Clarkson BDS, LaFrance‐Corey RG, Kahoud RJ, et al. Functional deficiency in endogenous interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome. Ann Neurol 2019;85:526–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kenney‐Jung DL, Vezzani A, Kahoud RJ, et al. Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome treated with Anakinra. Ann Neurol 2016;80:939–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dilena R, Mauri E, Aronica E, et al. Therapeutic effect of Anakinra in the relapsing chronic phase of febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome. Epilepsia Open 2019;4:344–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sa M, Singh R, Pujar S, et al. Centromedian thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation and Anakinra treatment for FIRES ‐ two different outcomes. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2019;23:749–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Westbrook C, Subramaniam T, Seagren RM, et al. Febrile Infection‐related epilepsy syndrome treated successfully with Anakinra in a 21‐year‐old woman. WMJ 2019;118:135–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hirsch LJ, Gaspard N, van Baalen A, et al. Proposed consensus definitions for new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions. Epilepsia 2018;59:739–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wittig M, Anmarkrud JA, Kassens JC, et al. Development of a high‐resolution NGS‐based HLA‐typing and analysis pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:e70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Helbig I, Lopez‐Hernandez T, Shor O, et al. A recurrent missense variant in AP2M1 impairs clathrin‐mediated endocytosis and causes developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Am J Hum Genet 2019;104:1060–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vogtle FN, Brandl B, Larson A, et al. Mutations in PMPCB encoding the catalytic subunit of the mitochondrial presequence protease cause neurodegeneration in early childhood. Am J Hum Genet 2018;102:557–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fan Y, Song YQ. PyHLA: tests for the association between HLA alleles and diseases. BMC Bioinformatics 2017;18:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42(Database issue):D980–D985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, et al. Analysis of protein‐coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 2016;536:285–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Havrilla JM, Pedersen BS, Layer RM, Quinlan AR. A map of constrained coding regions in the human genome. Nat Genet 2019;51:88–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. von Spiczak S, Helbig KL, Shinde DN, et al. DNM1 encephalopathy: a new disease of vesicle fission. Neurology 2017;89:385–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fujiwara T, Sugawara T, Mazaki‐Miyazaki E, et al. Mutations of sodium channel alpha subunit type 1 (SCN1A) in intractable childhood epilepsies with frequent generalized tonic‐clonic seizures. Brain 2003;126(Pt 3):531–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gaspard N, Hirsch LJ, Sculier C, et al. New‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): State of the art and perspectives. Epilepsia 2018;59:745–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Clinical characteristics in individuals with FIRES.

Table S2. Gene list for virtual epilepsy gene panel.

Table S3. Comparison of virtual gene panel content to epilepsy gene panel studies in the literature.

Table S4. Significant associations between HLA alleles and FIRES.


Articles from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES