Skip to main content
Nutrition Journal logoLink to Nutrition Journal
. 2020 Aug 26;19:90. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00605-0

Correction to: Effectiveness of gender-targeted versus gender-neutral interventions aimed at improving dietary intake, physical activity and/or overweight/obesity in young adults (aged 17–35 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thomas Sharkey 1,2, Megan C Whatnall 1,2, Melinda J Hutchesson 1,2, Rebecca L Haslam 1,2, Aaron Bezzina 1,2, Clare E Collins 1,2, Lee M Ashton 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7448514  PMID: 32847592

Correction to: Nutr J 19, 78 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00594-0

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors would like to correct the mix up in intervention groups when reporting results of one paper in the third paragraph under the heading Physical activity outcomes.

The sentence currently reads:

Maselli et al. found greater increases in MVPA in participants of a goal setting and feedback intervention who were provided a wearable activity tracker compared with individual counselling sessions and no intervention control (+ 1311.4–2372.9 MET mins/week)

The sentence should read:

Maselli et al. found greater increases in MVPA in participants who were provided with individual counselling sessions compared to a goal setting and feedback intervention who were provided a wearable activity tracker and a no intervention control group (+ 1311.4–2372.9 MET mins/week)

Reference

  • 1.Sharkey T, Whatnall MC, Hutchesson MJ, et al. Effectiveness of gender-targeted versus gender-neutral interventions aimed at improving dietary intake, physical activity and/or overweight/obesity in young adults (aged 17–35 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2020;19:78. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00594-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrition Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES