Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
letter
. 2020 Jun 9;9(1):1230–1232. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1766383

Clinical characteristics of foreign-imported COVID-19 cases in Shanghai, China

Xu-hui Liu a,b, Shui-hua Lu a,c, Jun Chen a, Lu Xia a, Zong-guo Yang a, Stratton Charles d, Yang Yang a, Yun Lin a, Hong-zhou Lu a,CONTACT
PMCID: PMC7448901  PMID: 32515651

To the Editor,

In December 2019, a nationwide coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic began in China and was finally controlled in early March 2020 [1, 2]. Few new domestic cases have been reported since late March 2020. Administrative screening for COVID-19 was initiated for people entering China beginning in March 2020. As travel to China from foreign countries has increased, imported cases of COVID-19 have also sharply increased [1]. Thus, China is facing new challenges in the fight against COVID-19.

A cross-sectional study of 58 patients aged 16–75 years and confirmed to have COVID-19 was conducted at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (SHPHC). COVID-19 was diagnosed according to World Health Organization interim guidelines. According to hospital records, the patients were admitted between 5 March and 22 March 2020. The ethics committee of SHPHC reviewed and approved the study procedure.

The clinical characteristics of patients with imported COVID-19 were reviewed using descriptive clinical epidemiological methods including clinical symptoms, exposure history, chest computed tomography (CT) imaging findings, and type of oxygen support required Anti-COVID-19 antibody, hematologic test, clinical chemistry test, coagulation test, and immune and inflammatory indices were obtained from the medical record system and the sampling time was no more than 24 h after admission.

Severe cases were defined as having at least one of the following criteria: (1) breath rate ≥30/min; (2) pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤93% at rest; (3) ration of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤300 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa). Critically ill cases were defined as having at least one of the following criteria: (1) respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation; (2) shock; (3) failure of other organ systems necessitating care in an intensive care unit [3].

The 58 foreign-imported cases were from 9 countries: 19 (32.8%) from the UK, 9 (15.5%) from Italy, 9 (15.5%) from the USA (15.5%), and the remaining from Spain (6, 10.3%), France (6, 10.3%), Iran (4, 6.9%), Switzerland (3, 5.2%), Austria (1, 1.7%), and Burkina Faso (1, 1.7%). The median age was 29 years (IQR, 20–44). Additionally, 53.4% (31/58) of patients were male and 81.3% (47/58) did not have a clear history of exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case. The median time from initial symptoms to confirmation was 3 days (IQR, 1–6). Five patients (8.6%) were asymptomatic. The most common symptoms were fever (50%, 29/58) and cough (41.4%, 24/58). High fever presented in only 3 (5.2%) cases. Some (13, 22.4%) patients did not present with either fever or cough. Atypical symptoms, such as nasopharyngeal irritation (19%), headache (10.3%), diarrhea (13.8%), or fatigue (10.3%), were relatively common. Comorbidities were uncommon (7/58, 12.1%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of imported COVID-19 cases.

Study population No. (%)
No. of patients 58
Sex, male 31 (53.4)
Age, median (IQR), y 29 (20-44)
 <65 56 (96.6)
 ≥65 2 (3.4)
Ethnic
 Asian 50 (86.2)
 White 7 (12.1)
 Latino 1 (1.7)
Highest patient temperature, median (IQR), °C 37.4 (36.8-37.9)
 <37.3 28 (48.3)
 37.3–39 27 (46.6)
 ≥39 3 (5.2)
Case exposure
 Confirmed COVID-19 11 (19.0)
 Suspicious 22 (37.9)
 Unkown 25 (43.1)
Time from onset to confirmation, median (IQR), d 3 (1-6)
 ≤3 35 (60.3)
 >3 23 (39.7)
Initial common symptoms
 Fever 29 (50.0)
 Cough 24 (41.4)
 Nasopharyngeal irritation 11 (19.0)
 Dyspnea 2 (3.4)
 Fatigue or myalgia 6 (10.3)
 Headache 6 (10.3)
 Diarrhea 4 (6.9)
Chest imaging, infiltrate
 Normal 24 (41.4)
 Pure GGO* (n = 34) 24 (70.6)
 GGO with reticular and/or interlobular septal thickening (n = 34) 12 (35.3)
 GGO with consolidation (n = 34) 6 (17.6)
 Consolidation (n = 34) 6 (17.6)
 Air bronchogram (n = 34) 9 (26.5)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension 7 (12.1)
 Diabetes 4 (6.9)
 Mood disorder 2 (3.4)
 Cardiovascular disease 3 (3.4)
 Chronic lung disease 4 (3.4)
 Other 3 (5.2)
Initial treatment
 Oxygen therapy 7 (12.1)
  Nasal cannula 8 (12.1)
  NMV 0 (0)
  IMV** 0 (0)
 Glucocorticoid 0 (0)
 Therapy
  Antibiotic 5 (8.6)
  Antiviral 0 (0)
  Hydroxychloroquine 57 (98.3)
  Thymalfasin 21 (36.2)
  Vitamin C 40 (69.0)

*GGO, ground-glass opacity; **IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.

Only 7 (12.1%) patients required nasal cannula oxygen therapy at admission. Only 5 (8.6%) were administered antimicrobial therapy. Hydroxychloroquine, vitamin C, and thymalfasin were administered as a general treatment.

As of April 4, two severe cases were observed. The first patient was a 54-year-old male identified at admission and who presented with symptoms 15 days prior to testing. Laboratory analysis revealed a low CD4+ T cell count; an Aspergillus species was isolated from sputum culture. The second patient was an elderly male (75 years) with no underlying health issues. Hematologic, biochemical, and infection-related indices were normal at admission. He developed a high fever, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and dyspnea within one week after admission. Two severe cases received noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NMV) support and glucocorticoid therapy. By April 4, both patients had been weaned from NMV and were stable. No critically ill cases were observed.

Twenty-two (39.2%, n = 56) patients were positive for COVID-19 antibody. Over half (36, 62.1%) of these patients presented a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and one-third had low pre-albumin (19, 32.8%) level. Approximately one-fourth presented with a mild increase in prothrombin time (17, 29.3%), fibrinogen (16, 27.6%), and D-dimer (12, 20.7%) and lower CD 4+ T cell counts (13, 22.4%).

Based on administrative screening of COVID-19 for all people entering China, many cases were detected in the early-stage and nearly all cases had a low risk of death [2,4–6]. Over 90% of patients presented mild symptoms in an early stage. Most patients (81.0%) did not have a clear contact history. Thus, self-awareness of possible COVID-19 infection was difficult for this population.

Symptoms associated with disease progression [4–6] including high fever, productive cough, and dyspnea were rare (<5% cases). Studies have reported that risk factors related to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome or death include older age, comorbidities, neutrophilia, low lymphocyte counts, high cytokine levels, coagulation abnormalities or organ dysfunction, and low CD4 T-cell counts [7]. In this study, most patients were young, had a low rate of comorbidities, and showed favourable laboratory indices. Severe cases were rare (3.4%), and the risk of death was low to medium.

The CT findings were consistent with those previously described [8]. Although some studies support routine CT scanning to screen for COVID-19, chest CT imaging was not highly sensitive in this population, mainly because the patients were mostly in early stages. Over 40% of our patients did not present with pulmonary changes in CT scanning; chest CT scans were negative in asymptomatic patients.

Most early-stage cases were from the UK, EU, and USA, indicating an increase in asymptomatic or mild cases in these countries. Our data support that the incoming international epidemic of SARS-CoV-2 originated from covert coronavirus infections [9]. However, hospital-isolation of each mild case may result in depletion of healthcare resources and threaten healthcare resources for patients with other diseases [10]. Additionally, the clinical course and hospitalisation time of patients with COVID-19 were much longer than those of influenza or community-acquired pneumonia. Zhou et al. [11] reported a median duration of viral shedding of 20 days (IQR 17–24), indicating that hospitalised isolation of all patients during an outbreak is not possible. Temporary medical care points such as “Fangcang hospital” or “community isolation point” should be used for these cases [12].

Therefore, immigrants should be continuously monitored for COVID-19 but high-level healthcare measures are not necessary in most cases, as severe disease is unlikely.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China: [grant number 81900005]; Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality: [grant number 20411950200].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. COVID-19 daily reports; 2020. Available from: https://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/xxgzbd/gzbd_index.shtml. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Chaolin H, Yeming W, Xingwang L, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mo P, Xing Y, Xiao Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of refractory COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 16: pii: ciaa270. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa270 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 13;34:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S.. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guan W-j, Ni Z-y, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb;382. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Int Med. 2020 Mar 13. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song F, Shi N, Shan F, et al. Emerging 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia. Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):210–217. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qiu J. Covert coronavirus infections could be seeding new outbreaks. Nature. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00822-x. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00822-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van Staden C. COVID-19 and the crisis of national development. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar 23. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0852-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou F., Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen S, Zhang Z, Yang J, et al. Fangcang shelter hospitals: a novel concept for responding to public health emergencies. Lancet. 2020 Apr 2395:1305–1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30744-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES