Abstract
The dome-shaped cornea is a transparent, non-vascularized, and epithelialized highly organized tissue. Physical and chemical injuries may trigger corneal wound healing (CWH) response and result in neovascularization that impairs the visual function. CWH involves not only migration, proliferation, and differentiation of the cells in different layers of cornea, but also the mobilization of immune cells. We demonstrated here that human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADSCs) could effectively inhibit neovascularization during ethanol-induced injury in mouse cornea. Importantly, we found that while neutrophils are essential for CWH, excessive and prolonged neutrophil retention during the granulation stage contributes to neovascularization. ADSCs were found to promote the clearance of neutrophils in the cornea during the granulation stage, likely via increasing the reverse transendothelial cell migration of CXCR4high neutrophils from cornea to the lung. Our results demonstrate that ADSCs are effective in treating CWH-induced neovascularization and modulation of neutrophil clearance could be novel strategies for better vision recovery after injury.
Subject terms: Chronic inflammation, Stem-cell research
Introduction
In addition to protecting the interior structure of the eye from environmental insults, the dome-shaped cornea also acts as a lens to focus light entering the eye. The latter function of the cornea depends on its precise radians and flawless transparency. However, trauma, burns, and infections may cause injury to the cornea and subsequently trigger corneal wound healing (CWH) response. Because CWH is often accompanied by disorganized structure of vague collagenous fibers and corneal neovascularization, corneal transparency may be compromised after healing. Thus the avascular status of the cornea is essential for its visional function and needs to be conscientiously maintained1. As in skin wound healing, inflammation, granulation, and remodeling are the three major steps in the process of corneal repair2–4. Previous studies suggest that each of these steps is closely associated with neovascularization5–9, however, the kinetics of this process is not fully described. Therefore, a better understanding of the pathophysiological process involved in CWH can help to identify the key steps involved in corneal neovascularization.
Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent and can be readily isolated and expanded from a number of tissues, including bone marrow, fat tissue, Wharton’s jelly of the umbilical cord, and amniotic fluid10. MSCs contribute to tissue homeostasis and regeneration by providing progenitor cells, growth factors, and most importantly the modulation of the inflammatory responses. This immunomodulatory ability of MSCs makes them a promising candidate for cell-based therapy in diverse types of tissue damages11,12. It has been reported that rat bone marrow-derived MSCs can inhibit corneal neovascularization induced by chemical injury13. Subsequent study has shown that human bone marrow MSCs (hBMMSCs) could induce tolerance against allo- and autoimmunity in the eye14. Most recently, it was reported that hBMMSCs inhibit lymphangiogenesis in the cornea by suppressing the recruitment of inflammatory macrophages15. These studies suggest a potential role of MSCs-based therapy in alleviating corneal neovascularization and implicated the importance of immune cells in neovascularization during CWH. As neutrophils are among the first responders to wound sites, neutrophil infiltration during CWH were thought to play a critical role in the healing process16. Neutrophils are thought to be important in angiogenesis, through releasing pro-angiogenic factors17. Moreover, MSCs have been reported to regulate neutrophil migration18. However, whether neutrophils play a role in corneal repair and neovascularization and if so, whether their functions in CWH can be modified by MSCs remain largely unknown.
Compared with BMMSCs, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (ADSCs) are relatively easier to obtain and also possess immunosuppressive and pro-regenerative properties19–22. They are 100 times more abundant in adipose tissue than MSCs in the bone marrow23. These properties make ADSCs favorable candidates in clinical applications. Indeed, injection of ADSCs resulted in better and faster re-epithelization and less inflammatory response in corneal lesions24. In this study, we sought to determine whether ADSCs expanded in vitro can be employed to promote the healing of corneal injury and, if so, whether such effect is related to their regulation of infiltration and clearance of neutrophils in cornea.
We established the ethanol-induced corneal injury mouse model and tested the effect retro-orbital injection of human ADSCs. Our results revealed that ADSCs dramatically reduced corneal neovascularization induced by ethanol exposure. This effect is achieved through inhibiting the formation of ECM during granulation. ADSCs treatment also promotes the reverse migration of CXCR4high neutrophils from ocular tissue and thereby alleviates neovascularization, supporting a role of excessive neutrophil retention in neovascularization during the granulation stage. Together, our results demonstrated an antiangiogenic function of ADSCs during CWH and that promoting the reverse migration of neutrophils could be a new approach for the treatment of corneal injury.
Materials and methods
Animals
BALB/c male mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China), and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All procedures were approved and conducted under the Guideline for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University.
Cell isolation and culture
ADSCs were obtained from the adipose tissue of lipoaspirate samples following the protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of Soochow University. Informed Consent was obtained from each patient. Adipose tissues were washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove debris and then treated with 0.1% collagenase I in DMEM/F12 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 1 h at 37 °C with gentle agitation. The digested samples were centrifuged at 400g for 5 min to separate adipocytes from stromal vascular fraction. The cell pellet containing the stromal fraction was resuspended in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin solution and 10 ng/mL bFGF and cultured in 10 cm dishes at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The medium was changed every 3 days thereafter. When the cells reached 90% confluence, the cultures were trypsinized and re-passaged. Passage 3–9 cells were used for the described experiments. ADSCs were characterized by flow cytometry (Beckman Cytoflex) with a series of primary antibodies described in Supplementary Fig. 1A. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs were assessed as previously described25.
Corneal injury healing model
Mice were anesthetized and the right eyes were immersed in 75% ethanol for 60 s, and were then immediately flushed with 10 ml PBS. For ADSC treatment, 5 × 105 cells or equal volume (75 μL) PBS were injected into the retro-orbital area 1 h after ethanol injury. Antibodies and inhibitors were in 100 μL PBS and intraperitoneally injected. Photos were taken under an anatomic microscope (Nikon SM27457) at different time points after treatment. Image pro plus 6.0 was used for the statistic analysis of the vascular area with the double blind method.
Fluorescein cornea angiography
Fluorescein sodium (2.5 μg/mice) was intravenously injected. After 1 min, the mice were euthanized and their corneas were removed immediately. The fluorescence was stimulated by blue illuminant and photographically recorded under an anatomic microscope (Nikon SM27457).
Sirius red stain and collagen quantification
Picro-sirius red staining kit (PSR-1, ScyTek) was used to visualize collagen fibrils. The total collagen content in the tissue sections were measured by Sirius Red/Fast Green Collagen Staining Kit (9046, Chondrex) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunofluorescence
The eyeballs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature, dehydrated with 30% sucrose before transferred into OCT medium (4583, SAKURA) and then frozen at −20 °C. The tissues were sectioned into 8 μm in thickness and placed on glass slides. The tissues mounted on slides were then washed with ddH2O for 10 min to remove OCT. For hematoxylin-eosin staining, slides were stained with hematoxylin (MINDEL GTS-1096) for 5 min, then stained with eosin (G1100, Solarbio) for 90 s. For immunofluorescence staining, slides were treated with 0.5% Triton (V900502-100ML, Sigma) for 15 min followed by 10% donkey serum for 1 h before incubating with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. On the next day, sections were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (PBST) and incubated with the secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33324 (H3570, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The antibodies (Abcam) against CD31, α-smooth muscle actin, Ly6G and MPO were used as primary antibodies. Secondary antibodies were Alexa 488-conjugated-goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abcam), Alexa 594-conjugated-goat anti-rat IgG (Abcam), and Alexa 555-conjugated-goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were captured under a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Leica).
Flow cytometry analysis
Whole eyeball cell suspensions were prepared following digestion with dispase and collagenase I as described for CFs isolation and red blood cells (RBC) were removed using a lysis solution (Invitrogen/Life Technologies), and washed twice in PBS (GIBCO) with 2% FBS. Lung tissues were cut and digested with collagenase II (0.5 mg/mL, 17101015, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 37 °C. Single-cell suspension of the lungs was prepared by pressing digested tissue through a cell strainer (70 µm) followed by RBC lysis. Cells were labeled with the monoclonal antibodies as described in the Reagent List (Supplementary Table 1).
For flow cytometric analysis, cells were stained with antibodies at 1:500 in 5% FBS/PBS for 30 min on ice. All flow cytometric analyses were performed using the Cytoflex Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed using the Flow Jo software (Version 9.6.2, Tree Star Inc.).
Culture of HuVEC in ADSCs-conditioned medium
ADSCs were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The condition medium was collected after 3 days of incubation. HuVECs (human umbilical derived endothelial cells, purchased from PromoCell (C-12203)) were plated in 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well and cultured in complete Endothelial Cell Growth Medium (C-22010, PromoCell) or ADSCs conditional medium (1:1 with fresh medium) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The cells were then collected for RNA extraction.
Induction of NETs
Total neutrophils from mouse bone marrow were obtained by negative selection using the EasySep Mouse Neutrophil Enrichment Kit (19762, STEM CELL) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were isolated as previous described26. NETs formation was induced by overnight stimulation of neutrophils (107 cells) with 20 nmol/L of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). The NETs layer deposited at the bottom of the culture dish was washed twice in PBS and collected by vigorous pipetting with 6 mL DMEM high glucose medium (with 10% FBS). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 300g for 10 min and the supernatant containing NETs were used for experiments.
Tube formation assay
Matrigel was 2× diluted (120 μL/well, 356234, BD Pharmingen) and added to wells of 48-well plates and placed at 37 °C for 3 h. Equal numbers of EAhy926 cells (as a gift from Prof. Quansheng Zhou) (3 × 104 cell/well) suspended in DMEM high glucose medium (with 10% FBS) were seeded with or without NETs (200 μL) onto matrigel and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. DNase1 (A610099-0250, BBI) were added at the concentration of 100 μg/μL. Images were captured using the cell imaging microporous plate detection system (Cytation5, BioTek).
Depletion and mobilization of neutrophils
Systemic neutrophil depletion was achieved by i.p. injection of 200 µg of purified monoclonal anti-Ly6G (127649, Biolegend) in 200 μL PBS to each mouse every other day. For neutrophils mobilization, mice were injected i.p. with SB225002 (antagonist of CXCR2, 25 μg/200 μL, S7651, Selleck) or AMD3100 (antagonist of CXCR4,125 μg/200 μL, S8030, Selleck) every day from the 3rd day to the 14th day after injury. Control mice were injected with sterile PBS.
Lung tissue explants culture
Lung tissues from each group of mice were chopped into small pieces. The explants were dispersed in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at half lung tissue per 500 μL, and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48 h. The supernatants from cultured lung explants were collected and centrifuged for ELISA.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Culture supernatants from lung tissue explant or mice serum were harvested for analyzing the production of CXCL12 using commercial ELISA kits (444207, Biolegend) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blotting analysis
Eyeball cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (P0013B, Beyotime) in the presence of protease inhibitors. Equal amounts of protein lysate samples were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin in tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 2 h, the membranes were probed overnight at 4 °C with respective primary antibodies. Membranes were washed three times followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were visualized by chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) with a Super sensitive automatic imaging analysis system (Protein simple FluorChem HD2).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using RNAfast 2000 (Fastagen) and reversely transcribed into cDNA using a ReverTra Ace quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) RT Kit (TOYOBO Life Science) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was carried out using SYBR Green Master Mix (4472920, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The relative mRNA levels of genes were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method, using β-actin as internal control.
In vivo imaging of ADSCs
ADSCs were suspended and incubated with 10 μM DiR buffer for 30 min at 37 °C according to the protocol from the manufacturer (125964, PerkinElmer). The DiR-labeled ADSCs were washed twice with PBS buffer and injected as above described. Mice were imaged dorsally with IVIS Spectrum on Day 1, 3, 7, an Day 14. The lungs were harvested for ex vivo imaging at different time points.
Statistical analysis
One-way ANOVA was performed to determine statistical significance using GraphPad Prism 6. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences were considered statistically significant at P values less than 0.05.
Results
ADSC treatment alleviates neovascularization in injured cornea
Like in most tissues, wound healing in cornea undergoes three typical stages: inflammation, granulation, and remodeling. Nevertheless, the repair process is usually accompanied by irreversible neovascularization, which often penetrate the stromal layer of the cornea and result in loss of corneal transparency. We, therefore, first explored the effect of ADSCs on CWH-induced neovascularization. Human ADSCs were isolated and characterized according to the standard protocol (Supplementary Fig. 1). To establish a chemical burn-induced corneal wound healing model, we covered the right eye of each mouse with 75% ethanol (EtOH) for 60 s and then flushed the eye with PBS immediately after. The EtOH-treated eyes were then treated within an hour with 5 × 105 ADSCs or equal volume PBS via retro-orbital injection. The cornea in the ADSC treatment mice showed less cloudiness compared with the EtOH mice 28 days after injury (Fig. 1a). The area occupied by blood vessels in cornea was also significantly reduced after ADSCs treatment (Fig. 1b, c). In addition, the expression of CD31, representing endothelial cells, was markedly increased in the EtOH group but not in the EtOH + ADSCs group (Fig. 1d). To eliminate the interference of tunicae vasculosa, the whole cornea was removed for CD31 immunofluorescence staining and revealed tubular structures on the cornea of the EtOH group, whereas such structure is less apparent and exhibited weaker staining in the EtOH + ADSCs group (Fig. 1e). In addition, the fluorescein sodium staining of vascular endothelium showed that the EtOH group could emit intense green fluorescence due to neovascularization, while the fluorescence intensity in the EtOH + ADSCs group was much lower, indicating that the newly formed capillaries were reduced after ADSCs treatment (Fig. 1f). All these results suggest that ADSCs can significantly alleviate pathologic neovascularization in cornea.
ADSC treatment reduces corneal thickening during granulation
Various studies have shown that MSCs can promote neovascularization27–29. Here, we speculated that ADSCs might indirectly inhibit neovascularization in our CWH model. Examination of the cornea at different stages of the corneal reconstruction process revealed that the corneal stromal tissue was thickened and the anterior segment of the eyeball was enlarged remarkably in the EtOH group during the typical granulation stage (about 7–14 days after injury) (Fig. 2a). The corneal thickness at this stage was significantly reduced in the ADSCs treated group than in the EtOH group (Fig. 2b–d). These data suggest that ADSC treatment can ameliorate corneal granulomatous hyperplasia triggered by EtOH injury.
ADSC treatment attenuates corneal fibrosis
Granulomatous-like hyperplasia is a characteristic of corneal stromal fibrosis30. It has been reported that TGF-β secreted by the corneal epithelial cells can stimulate the corneal fibroblasts (CFs) to differentiate into myofibroblasts in the corneal stroma31. It has been shown that corneal myofibroblasts (CMFs) are highly proliferative and can secrete extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) such as collagen, fibronectin, and tenascin C in response to corneal injuries32. Since ECM and neovascularization have been implicated in a variety of diseases33–35, we wondered if ADSC treatment could reduce the production of ECM. We observed that there was much less collagen deposition after treatment with ADSCs (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). Furthermore, we examined the expression of genes encoding the ECM components in the cornea and found that the mRNA levels of Col3a1, fibronectin, and tenascin C were significantly decreased after ADSC treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2C). These results suggest that that ADSC therapy may reduce ECM deposition by inhibiting the differentiation of CFs. We therefore examined the expression of α-SMA, a marker of CMFs, in the cornea after ADSC treatment. We found that the expression levels of α-SMA were lower in the EtOH + ADSCs group than in the EtOH group as shown by immunofluorescence staining (Supplementary Fig. 2D). These results strongly suggest that ADSCs inhibit ECM formation of CFs and thus alleviate corneal fibrosis.
Depletion of peripheral neutrophils during granulation reduces neovascularization
During the granulation stage, we also observed that in the corneal stroma, there were a large number of immune cells, especially Ly6G+ neutrophils. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3A, the number of neutrophils in the eyeball during granulation was about 50 times that of macrophages. Remarkably, after ADSCs treatment, the infiltration of CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophil was significantly decreased (Fig. 3a). This prompted us to consider neutrophils as an important player in neovascularization. Therefore, we applied anti-Ly6G antibody every two days, from the day prior the injury induction to the 14th day after injury, to systemically deplete the neutrophils. The depletion effectiveness of peripheral neutrophils was about 98% (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Normally, corneal neovascularization was apparent 21 days after the EtOH treatment, however, in neutrophils depleted mice, EtOH treatment caused severe necrosis of the cornea (Supplementary Fig. 4). This resembles the observation that a large number of neutrophils infiltrated the wound at the early stage during skin wound healing, and neutrophil depletion in the early inflammatory phase delayed the wound healing36. This led us to speculate e that neutrophil infiltration in cornea at the early stage of CWH is essential to promote wound healing. In order not to disrupt the early infiltration of neutrophils, we injected anti-Ly6G every two days from the 3rd to 14th day after the injury and found that the neovascularization in the delayed antibody injection group was significantly reduced (Fig. 3b, c). Consistently, the induction of CD31 by EtOH in mouse eyeballs was attenuated (Fig. 3d, e). CXCR2 is a key molecule to mediate neutrophil migration from bone marrow to periphery as inhibition of CXCR2 can reduce the number of peripheral neutrophils37. Therefore, we tested whether inhibiting CXCR2 could alleviate corneal neovascularization. We showed that the injection of SB225002, an inhibitor of CXCR2, from the 3rd to 14th day after injury could significantly reduce corneal neovascularization (Fig. 3f, g). These results suggest that neutrophils play an important role in corneal repair and neovascularization. While lack of neutrophils at the initial stage will seriously hamper corneal repair, accelerated clearance of neutrophils during granulation stage could inhibit corneal neovascularization.
ADSC treatment promotes the clearance of neutrophils at the granulation stage
There are two possible mechanisms to account for the decrease in the number of neutrophils during granulation after ADSCs treatment: reduction in immigration or increase in emigration. We first investigated whether ADSCs could affect neutrophil migration into the eyeball. The mRNA levels of neutrophil chemokines such as Ccl-9, Cxcl-2, Cxcl-3, Cxcl-5, and Cxcl-7 in the eye balls at the inflammatory stage (Day 3) of injury were compared between the EtOH and EtOH + ADSCs groups and found not difference (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, we measured the abundance of neutrophils in the ocular tissue by flow cytometry. We found that the proportion and absolute number of neutrophils at the inflammatory stage were not affected by ADSC treatment (Fig. 4b, c). However, at the granulation stage, the number of neutrophils in the EtOH + ADSCs group was significantly decreased when compared to the EtOH group (Day 7) (Fig. 4d, e), consistent with the result shown in Fig. 4a. These results suggest that while ADSC treatment does not affect the chemotaxis and infiltration of neutrophils at inflammatory stage, it somehow decreases the retention of neutrophils in corneal stroma during granulation.
ADSCs treatment promotes the emigration of CXCR4high neutrophils
Because the chemotaxis of neutrophils at the early phase of injury is not affected by ADSCs, we speculated that the effect of ADSCs could be exerted by promoting the emigration of neutrophils. It has been reported that neutrophils with high expression of CXCR4 migrate to the bone marrow for clearance37,38. We found that 3 days after injury, fewer CXCR4high neutrophils were detected in the eyes of the EtOH + ADSCs group than in the EtOH group, though there was no difference in the total numbers of neutrophils between these two groups (Fig. 5a). It has been reported that AMD3100, an inhibitor of CXCR4, can prevent neutrophils from homing to the bone marrow37,38. We showed that after the injection of AMD3100, the accumulation of CXCR4high neutrophils were further increased in the eyeball tissues (Fig. 5b). In addition, the injection of AMD3100 can effectively reverse the decreased neutrophil count induced by ADSC treatment (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, the labeled ADSCs were found to migrate into the lungs (Supplementary Fig. 5B). This lung migration pattern of ADSCs corresponded to the reported emigration of neutrophils from injury site to the lung during aseptic liver inflammation39. Therefore, we measured the number of neutrophils in the lung tissue in each group on Day 7 and found that while ADSC treatment did not increase the total number of neutrophils, there is a significant increase in CXCR4high neutrophils in the lungs (Fig. 5d). Since the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis was considered to be the key signal pathway to regulate neutrophil homing37,38, we tested whether ADSCs affect the retention of CXCR4high neutrophils by regulating the expression of CXCL12 in local or lung tissue. However, examination of CXCL12 expression in eyeball tissue and lung extract showed no increased expression of CXCL12 by ADSCs (Fig. 5e, f). In addition, there was no significant difference in the concentration of CXCL12 in serum between ETOH group and EtOH + ADSCs group (Fig. 5g). These results suggest that ADSCs treatment could facilitate the emigration of the CXCR4high neutrophils from eye tissue, but it operates independently of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis.
ADSCs accelerate neutrophil reverse transmigration by regulating the expression of Jam-c in endothelial cells
In addition to moving from the vascular lumen to the extravascular tissue (transendothelial cell migration; TEM), neutrophils also exhibit reverse motility through the endothelium (rTEM)40. These events were noted in inflammation following ischemia–reperfusion injury, characterized by reduced expression of junctional adhesion molecule C (JAM-C) from EC junctions41. Since rTEM can also be one of the reasons for the reduced neutrophil retention in the cornea, we explored whether ADSCs can regulate the rTEM of neutrophils in eye tissue. We found that ADSCs treatment could significantly reduce the expression of Jam-c in eye tissue. Meanwhile, the expression of LTB4 in eye tissue, which has been reported to mediate the reduced expression of endothelial cell JAM-C in I–R model40, was up-regulated after ADSCs treatment (Fig. 6a). In addition, EC junctional molecules such as CD99 and Pecam1, which were positively correlated with neutrophil TEM42–44, were downregulated after ADSC treatment (Fig. 6b). These results suggest that ADSCs treatment could enhance rTEM of neutrophils in eye tissue without affecting TEM. Since there was more accumulation of CXCR4high neutrophils in the lungs in ADSCs group, we next tested whether these neutrophils may have translocated via rTEM. Studies have shown that neutrophils that have undergone rTEM can be distinguished by high expression of ICAM-1 and low expression of CXCR1, which serve as useful markers for identifying rTEM neutrophils41,45,46. We observed that the absolute number of ICAM1+CXCR1low neutrophils in CXCR4high neutrophils was significantly higher in the lung tissue after ADSC treatment (Fig. 6c, d). Since DiR-labeled ADSCs could still be detected around the eyeball 14 days after injection (Supplementary Fig. 5A), and Jam-c is mainly expressed in endothelial cells41,47 we wonder whether ADSCs can directly regulate the expression of Jam-c in endothelial cells. We found that the expression of Jam-c in endothelial cells was significantly decreased by ADSC culture supernatant, which was consistent with the results in eye tissues (Fig. 6e). Furthermore, ADSC culture supernatant could down-regulate the expression of CD99 and significantly upregulate the expression of adhesion molecule Icam-1 on endothelial cells (Fig. 6e). These results suggest that ADSCs can promote the rTEM of neutrophils in cornea by regulating the expression of Jam-c in vascular endothelial cells, thus reducing the retention of CXCR4high neutrophils.
NETs regulate corneal neovascularization
It has been reported that neutrophils can form NETs in aseptic inflammatory tissues48. We also found in our cornea injury model that the expression of MPO, a marker of NETs, was significantly increased in cornea stroma on the 7th day after injury. Importantly, ADSC treatment dramatically lowered MPO expression (Fig. 7a). The expression of H3-cit and MPO in the whole eyeball was also elevated (Fig. 7b). We subsequently tested whether the NETs contribute to neovascularization during the repair of corneal injury. We induced NETs in vitro and then co-cultured them with CFs. NETs were found to upregulate the expression of Vegfa in CFs. This induction of Vegfa was partially blocked by DNase1 treatment (Fig. 7c). In an assay using EAhy926 human endothelial cells, we showed that NETs increased neovascularization and DNase I significantly reduced it (Fig. 7d). This neovascularization-promoting effect of NETs is also supported by the increased expression of Cldn5 and Vecad in endothelial cells (Fig. 7e).
Taken together, our studies revealed that neutrophils at the granulation stage can form NETs locally. These NETs then directly promote neovascularization. Administration of ADSCs reduces neutrophil retention in the cornea stroma and thus minimizing the NET formation and corneal vascularization.
Discussion
Cornea are devoid of any blood vessels. However, when corneal injury occurs, vasculatures are formed to transport nutrients and immune cells as an essential part of the repair and regeneration cascade. The reparation often results in either complete restoration of the clear cornea or the formation of persistent blood vessels that cloud the cornea. Therefore, the reduction in corneal neovascularization has always been a challenge in ophthalmology. Based on their pro-angiogenic roles in the tumors and other wounded tissues, VEGF, PDGF, and MMP family members have been explored as candidate targets for keeping the transparency of the cornea49–51. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells were also explored as a therapeutic for corneal neovascularization13. This effect of MSCs was partially due to TSG-6, as TSG-6 was shown to be an effector in this application52. However, because the corneal repair process was not monitored for all stages in the previous studies, how mesenchymal stem cells participate in the entire repair process remains largely unknown.
In this study, to better simulate clinical situations, we followed the corneal repair process for an extended time, longer than 3 weeks, and further investigated the mechanisms underlying the ameliorating effect of adipose MSCs on corneal repair. We verified that ADSCs could inhibit corneal neovascularization (Fig. 1). Compared to the short-term follow-up used in previous studies, the long-term follow-up (more than 3 weeks) has two important advantages. First, after three weeks, the corneal repair process has entered the remodeling stage and the shape and size of the cornea are basically restored to their original dimensions, enabling a more accurate evaluation of neovascularization. Second, the extended evaluation allowed us to examine the different stages along a longer repairing process. We found that the most noticeable event in the repairing process is granulation, which is typically accompanied by fibrosis. Corneal fibrosis, also known as collagen fiber recover and scar formation, is characterized by myofibroblast differentiation and proliferation, corneal stromal thickening and the production of a large amount of extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM is not only one of the main structural components in various tissues, but also plays a vital role in neovascularization during physiological and pathological conditions33. It provides a platform for angiogenic signaling by increasing the bioavailability of soluble angiogenic factors, and by enhancing the interaction between ECM components and their cellular transmembrane receptors34,35. We found that after ADSC treatment, the expression of α-SMA was significantly decreased in the eyes, and the ECM components, such as collagen, fibronectin, and tenascin C, were also decreased. A previous study showed that aged fibroblasts overexpressing ECM components are associated with corneal neovascularization8. Therefore, we concluded that ADSCs could reduce neovascularization by inhibiting corneal fibrosis.
The other feature that accompanied granulation is the persistent infiltration of neutrophils in the corneal stroma. Unlike skin injury-induced rapid mobilization of neutrophils (within 30 min) and the subsequent replacement by macrophages (2–3 days), neutrophil infiltration to the damaged cornea can be seen throughout the inflammatory and granulation stages. We found that on the 7th day after injury, the number of neutrophils in the eyeball was still about 50 times that of macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 3A). This result led us to believe that neutrophils, which are overwhelmingly dominant in numbers, are very important for CWH. By depleting neutrophils starting at different time points during CWH, we showed that neutrophil infiltration in the early stage is necessary and beneficial for corneal repair (Supplementary Fig. 4). However, depleting neutrophils after significant infiltration reduced neovascularization afterwards, indicating that long-term retention of neutrophils in the eyeball is critical for promoting neovascularization (Fig. 3b, c). While ADSC treatment had little effect on the early neutrophil infiltration, it significantly reduced the number of neutrophils at the granulation stage (Fig. 4). This suggests that that ADSCs may regulate the retention of neutrophils at the injury site.
It has been unequivocally demonstrated that neutrophils may emigrate through the endothelium40,41. Senescent neutrophils were shown to migrate to bone marrow for clearance, a process dependent on the increased CXCR4 expression on those aged neutrophils that allows their homing to bone marrow via CXCL12-mediated chemotaxis37,38. In the corneal injury model, we found that 3 days after injury, there were also fewer CXCR4high neutrophils in the eyes of the EtOH + ADSCs group than in those of the EtOH group (the two groups had similar neutrophil counts in the eyeball at this time) (Fig. 5a). This result suggests that the ADSC treatment may have increased the emigration of aged neutrophils. Since a previous study showed that neutrophils during liver aseptic inflammation migrate from the injury site to the lungs39, we examined neutrophils in the lungs as well and found that except neutrophils, ADSCs were also found in the lungs (Fig. 5d). Therefore, we speculated that ADSCs may function to promote the mobilization of CXCR4high neutrophils to the lungs. Indeed, the number of CXCR4high neutrophils in the lungs of ADSC treated group was significantly higher than that in the EtOH group. Importantly, upon the application of CXCR4 inhibitor, AMD3100, CXCR4high neutrophils in the cornea increased and resulted in more severe neovascularization (Fig. 5b, c). These results suggest that the emigration of aged neutrophils is a significant factor in the regulation of neovascularization, and ADSCs can reduce corneal neovascularization by promoting the migration of CXCR4high neutrophils.
Although many studies suggest that the CXCR4high neutrophils are regulated by CXCL1253–55, in our model, we did not find that EtOH + ADSCs group, which aggregates more CXCR4high neutrophils in the lung, showed neither increased CXCL12 expression in the lung nor decreased CXCL12 expression in the eyeball (Fig. 5e, f). These results suggest that ADSCs did not mediate neutrophil emigration by affecting chemotactic signals. On the other hand, neutrophils can also exhibit motility away from sites of inflammation and injury, which known as the reverse migration of neutrophils.The enhancement of rTEM, which is positively correlated with the low expression of adhesion molecule Jam-C in endothelial cells, can reduce the retention of neutrophils in tissues. We found that ADSC treatment can not only increase the number of rTEM neutrophils in the lung, but also effectively reduce the expression of Jam-c in eye tissue (Fig. 6a–d). Co-culture of ADSCs and endothelial cells can also reduce the expression of Jam-C in endothelial cells (Fig. 6e). Although the specific factor(s) produced by ADSCs has yet to be identified, these results suggest that ADSCs can enhance the rTEM of neutrophils by regulating the expression of Jam-c in endothelial cells, thus reducing the retention of neutrophils in corneal.
Neutrophils have been reported to promote neovascularization in a variety of ways56–58, one of which is through the NETs26. NETs are structures released from neurtropils composed of chromatin filaments coated with histones, proteases, and granular and cytosolic proteins, which are believed to allow neutrophils to catch and kill bacteria. However, increasing evidence suggests that this process also occurs in sterile inflammation48. We found that the expression of two NETs markers, MPO and H3-cit, was upregulated in the cornea during granulation (Fig. 7b). Therefore, it is possible that the neutrophils that fail to emigrate to the bone marrow or lungs promptly may form NETs in the corneal stroma and promote neovascularization. Our experiments indeed showed that DNase1 could reduce tube formation of endothelial induced by NETs (Fig. 7d). Nevertheless, this important role of neutrophil retention may be manifold and need to be further explored.
In summary, our work revealed that ADSCs can effectively inhibit neovascularization caused by corneal injury. Importantly, we found that neutrophils are critically involved in corneal wound healing and have opposite effects at different stages of the healing process. We demonstrated that ADSCs can attenuate injury-induced neovascularization, possibly by enabling the prompt clearance of neutrophils from injury sites. Our results suggest that the kinetics of neutrophil migration is a accurately regulated process during corneal wound healing, and complete absence and excessive retention of neutrophils can both impair or derail the desirable healing process (Fig. 8).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0107500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81530043 and 81930085), the Suzhou Science and Technology Program (SZS201616) and Better Society Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2016671), and State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University (GZN1201804 and GZN1201903).
Funding
The funding institutions had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation or writing of the paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by G. Melino
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These author contributed equally: Qianwen Shang, Yunpeng Chu
Contributor Information
Changshun Shao, Email: shaoc@suda.edu.cn.
Yufang Shi, Email: yfshi@suda.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-020-02914-y).
References
- 1.Bukowiecki, A., Hos, D., Cursiefen, C. & Eming, S. A. Wound-healing studies in cornea and skin: parallels, differences and opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms18061257 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Ljubimov AV, Saghizadeh M. Progress in corneal wound healing. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 2015;49:17–45. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pahlitzsch T, Sinha P. The alkali burned cornea: electron microscopical, enzyme histochemical, and biochemical observations. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1985;223:278–286. doi: 10.1007/BF02153659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kilarski WW, Samolov B, Petersson L, Kvanta A, Gerwins P. Biomechanical regulation of blood vessel growth during tissue vascularization. Nat. Med. 2009;15:657–664. doi: 10.1038/nm.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strieter RM, et al. Interleukin-8. A corneal factor that induces neovascularization. Am. J. Pathol. 1992;141:1279–1284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cursiefen C, et al. VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment. J. Clin. Investig. 2004;113:1040–1050. doi: 10.1172/JCI20465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dong, M. et al. Autocrine IL-1beta mediates the promotion of senescent fibroblasts on corneal neovascularization. Am. J. Physiol.10.1152/ajpcell.00205.2017 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Zhou Q, et al. Role of senescent fibroblasts on alkali-induced corneal neovascularization. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227:1148–1156. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Han KY, Tran JA, Chang JH, Azar DT, Zieske JD. Potential role of corneal epithelial cell-derived exosomes in corneal wound healing and neovascularization. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40548. doi: 10.1038/srep40548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shi Y, et al. How mesenchymal stem cells interact with tissue immune responses. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Y, Chen X, Cao W, Shi Y. Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:1009–1016. doi: 10.1038/ni.3002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shi Y, et al. Immunoregulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem and stromal cells in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018;14:493–507. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oh JY, et al. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1047–1055. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ko JH, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells precondition lung monocytes/macrophages to produce tolerance against allo- and autoimmunity in the eye. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:158–163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522905113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Song HB, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit inflammatory lymphangiogenesis in the cornea by suppressing macrophage in a TSG-6-dependent manner. Mol. Ther. 2018;26:162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gronert K, et al. A role for the mouse 12/15-lipoxygenase pathway in promoting epithelial wound healing and host defense. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:15267–15278. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410638200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Seignez C, Phillipson M. The multitasking neutrophils and their involvement in angiogenesis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2017;24:3–8. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu PF, et al. TNFalpha-activated mesenchymal stromal cells promote breast cancer metastasis by recruiting CXCR2(+) neutrophils. Oncogene. 2017;36:482–490. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Higashimoto M, et al. Adipose tissue derived stromal stem cell therapy in murine ConA-derived hepatitis is dependent on myeloid-lineage and CD4+ T-cell suppression. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013;43:2956–2968. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao H, et al. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells attenuate adipose inflammation and obesity through polarizing M2 macrophages and beiging in white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2018;67:235–247. doi: 10.2337/db17-0356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakagami H, et al. Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells as a novel option for regenerative cell therapy. J. Atheroscler. Thrombosis. 2006;13:77–81. doi: 10.5551/jat.13.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bora P, Majumdar AS. Adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction in regenerative medicine: a brief review on biology and translation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017;8:145. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0598-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Muneta T. Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2521–2529. doi: 10.1002/art.21212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zeppieri, M. et al. Adipose derived stem cells for corneal wound healing after laser induced corneal lesions in mice. J. Clin. Med.10.3390/jcm6120115 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Wang G, et al. Kynurenic acid, an IDO metabolite, controls TSG-6-mediated immunosuppression of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:1209–1223. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0006-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aldabbous L, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote angiogenesis: evidence from vascular pathology in pulmonary hypertension. Arterioscler. Thrombosis Vasc. Biol. 2016;36:2078–2087. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fujita Y, Kawamoto A. Stem cell-based peripheral vascular regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017;120:25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gonzalez-King H, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha potentiates jagged 1-mediated angiogenesis by mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1747–1759. doi: 10.1002/stem.2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang S, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta identifies mesenchymal stem cells with enhanced engraftment to tissue injury and pro-angiogenic property. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:547–561. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2641-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saika S, et al. Fibrotic disorders in the eye: targets of gene therapy. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 2008;27:177–196. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shu DY, Lovicu FJ. Myofibroblast transdifferentiation: the dark force in ocular wound healing and fibrosis. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 2017;60:44–65. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamanaka O, Sumioka T, Saika S. The role of extracellular matrix in corneal wound healing. Cornea. 2013;32(Suppl 1):S43–S45. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000441180.54146.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Van Obberghen-Schilling E, et al. Fibronectin and tenascin-C: accomplices in vascular morphogenesis during development and tumor growth. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2011;55:511–525. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103243eo. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Astrof S, Hynes RO. Fibronectins in vascular morphogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2009;12:165–175. doi: 10.1007/s10456-009-9136-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ballard VL, et al. Vascular tenascin-C regulates cardiac endothelial phenotype and neovascularization. FASEB J. 2006;20:717–719. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5131fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ebaid H. Neutrophil depletion in the early inflammatory phase delayed cutaneous wound healing in older rats: improvements due to the use of un-denatured camel whey protein. Diagnostic Pathol. 2014;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martin C, et al. Chemokines acting via CXCR2 and CXCR4 control the release of neutrophils from the bone marrow and their return following senescence. Immunity. 2003;19:583–593. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00263-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Furze RC, Rankin SM. Neutrophil mobilization and clearance in the bone marrow. Immunology. 2008;125:281–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02950.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang J, et al. Visualizing the function and fate of neutrophils in sterile injury and repair. Science. 2017;358:111–116. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Colom B, et al. Leukotriene B4-neutrophil elastase axis drives neutrophil reverse transendothelial cell migration in vivo. Immunity. 2015;42:1075–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Woodfin A, et al. The junctional adhesion molecule JAM-C regulates polarized transendothelial migration of neutrophils in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:761–769. doi: 10.1038/ni.2062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nourshargh S, Alon R. Leukocyte migration into inflamed tissues. Immunity. 2014;41:694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Voisin MB, Nourshargh S. Neutrophil transmigration: emergence of an adhesive cascade within venular walls. J. Innate Immun. 2013;5:336–347. doi: 10.1159/000346659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vestweber D, Wessel F, Nottebaum AF. Similarities and differences in the regulation of leukocyte extravasation and vascular permeability. Semin. Immunopathol. 2014;36:177–192. doi: 10.1007/s00281-014-0419-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Buckley CD, et al. Identification of a phenotypically and functionally distinct population of long-lived neutrophils in a model of reverse endothelial migration. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006;79:303–311. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0905496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burn T, Alvarez JI. Reverse transendothelial cell migration in inflammation: to help or to hinder? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017;74:1871–1881. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2444-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bradfield PF, et al. JAM-C regulates unidirectional monocyte transendothelial migration in inflammation. Blood. 2007;110:2545–2555. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jorch SK, Kubes P. An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat. Med. 2017;23:279–287. doi: 10.1038/nm.4294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chang JH, et al. Corneal neovascularization: an anti-VEGF therapy review. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2012;57:415–429. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Turgut B, Guler M, Akpolat N, Demir T, Celiker U. The impact of tacrolimus on vascular endothelial growth factor in experimental corneal neovascularization. Curr. Eye Res. 2011;36:34–40. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.516620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Keating AM, Jacobs DS. Anti-VEGF treatment of corneal neovascularization. Ocul. Surf. 2011;9:227–237. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(11)70035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Oh JY, et al. Anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6 reduces inflammatory damage to the cornea following chemical and mechanical injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:16875–16880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012451107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Suratt BT, et al. Role of the CXCR4/SDF-1 chemokine axis in circulating neutrophil homeostasis. Blood. 2004;104:565–571. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Devi S, et al. Neutrophil mobilization via plerixafor-mediated CXCR4 inhibition arises from lung demargination and blockade of neutrophil homing to the bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2013;210:2321–2336. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Eash KJ, Means JM, White DW, Link DC. CXCR4 is a key regulator of neutrophil release from the bone marrow under basal and stress granulopoiesis conditions. Blood. 2009;113:4711–4719. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-177287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang Y, Li L, Liu Y, Liu ZR. PKM2 released by neutrophils at wound site facilitates early wound healing by promoting angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regener. 2016;24:328–336. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Massena S, et al. Identification and characterization of VEGF-A-responsive neutrophils expressing CD49d, VEGFR1, and CXCR4 in mice and humans. Blood. 2015;126:2016–2026. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-631572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Christoffersson G, et al. VEGF-A recruits a proangiogenic MMP-9-delivering neutrophil subset that induces angiogenesis in transplanted hypoxic tissue. Blood. 2012;120:4653–4662. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-421040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.