Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2020 Apr 17;102(7):548–549. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0055

Self-retaining retractor and bone reduction forceps to manage a mandibular fracture

JE Tebbutt 1,, G Markose 2, RM Graham 1
PMCID: PMC7450448  PMID: 32302211

Background

Para/symphyseal mandibular fractures can require three skilled operators; one for fracture reduction, another for suction and a further for placing/fixing osteosynthesis plates. Use of bone reduction forceps can help reduction and fixation of mandibular fractures. They facilitate precise anatomical reduction and fewer post-operative complications.1 We demonstrate an alternative method, utilising instruments found on a standard surgical trauma tray, allowing self-retention, reduction and retraction.

Technique

A mucoperiosteal flap is raised exposing the fracture. Two burr holes are made either side of the fracture, halfway down the mandibular vertical height for even fracture reduction force (Fig 1). Curved artery forceps are inserted to engage the holes (to 5-6mm depth, avoiding nerves) and closed on a ratchet. Then, an Obwegeser periosteal elevator is placed below the lower border, resting on the lower lip. The forceps ratchet is rested on the elevator shank, creating a self-retaining retractor with bone reduction (Fig 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical photo demonstrating burr holes made either side of the fracture line, halfway down the mandibular vertical height

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Curved artery forceps engage the burr holes and close on a ratchet. An Obwegeser periosteal elevator is placed below the lower border, resting on the lower lip. The forceps ratchet is rested on the elevator shank, creating a self-retaining retractor with bone reduction

Discussion

Use of reduction-compression forceps in reducing mandibular fractures has successful outcomes.2 However, there are few references regarding their use.1-5 They have advantages including three-dimensional positioning and compression of bone fragments, and the reduced need for perioperative IMF.2 This technique means the surgeon has both hands free to place fixation and allows good vision/access to the fracture site. Although crazing at burr hole sites has been reported in a laboratory study, this has not been found in clinical practice.5

References

  • 1.Choi BH, Kim HJ, Kim MK, et al. Management of mandibular angle fractures using the mandibular angle reduction forceps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 257–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scolozzi P, Jaques B. Intraoral open reduction and internal fixation of displaced mandibular angle fractures using a specific ad hoc reduction-compression forceps: a preliminary study. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 497–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rogers GF, Sargent LA. Modified towel-clamp technique to effect reduction of displaced mandible fractures. Plast Reconstructive Surg 2000; 695–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kallela I, Ilzuka T, Laine P, Lindqvist C. Lag-screw fixation of mandibular parasymphyseal and angle fractures. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 510–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choi BH, Park JH, Yoo TM et al. Evaluation of stress patterns generated by reduction forceps within a photoelastic mandibular model. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 2003; 120–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES