Abstract
Purpose of review:
This review highlights the most common congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) that are encountered in pediatric practices. CAKUT are the most common cause of prenatally diagnosed developmental malformations and encompass a spectrum of disorders impacting lower urinary tract development as well as kidney development and function. In pediatric and adolescent populations, developmental abnormalities are the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease. The goal of this review is to provide pediatric providers a framework for appropriate clinical management as well as highlight when referral to subspecialty care is needed.
Recent findings:
While the exact etiologies of CAKUT are not completely defined, new evidence demonstrates that genetic and molecular changes impact embryonic kidney and urinary tract development. As a result, phenotypes and clinical outcomes may be affected.
Summary:
Because pediatric providers provide front-line care to children and adolescents with developmental kidney and urinary tract anomalies, updated knowledge of CAKUT pathogenesis, embryology, clinical management, and patient outcomes is needed. This manuscript reviews CAKUT etiologies and essential diagnostic, prognostic, and management strategies.
Keywords: Nephrology, Urology, Congenital Kidney Anomalies, Pediatrics, Genetics, Embryology
Introduction:
Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) represent a broad range of disorders that result from developmental abnormalities of the lower urinary tract, urinary collecting system, disrupted embryonic migration of the kidney(s), or abnormal renal parenchymal development. Lower urinary abnormalities are identified in about 50% of affected patients and include vesicoureteral reflux (25%), ureteropelvic junction obstruction (11%), and ureterovesical junction obstruction (11%) [1, 2]. Kidney malformations are commonly identified in the antenatal period and account for 20-30% of all detectable anomalies [3, 2, 4]. Severity can range from mild antenatal pelviectasis to bilateral renal agenesis (Table 1). These disorders impact approximately 2% of all pregnancies and are often associated with additional developmental abnormalities or genetic syndromes (Table 2) [5]. Data from large registries show that CAKUT is a major cause of morbidity in pediatric and adolescent patient populations, accounting for 30-50% of end-stage kidney disease [2, 4]. The diagnosis and management of neonates, infants, and children with CAKUT occurs in diverse clinical arenas – including prenatal obstetrics, pediatric primary care offices, pediatric nephrology, and pediatric urology clinics. If undetected in childhood, CAKUT can present with renal problems in adulthood. These include hypertension, proteinuria, and renal impairment, which often require referral to adult nephrology [6, 7].
Table 1.
Phenotypic Spectrum of CAKUT
| Renal agenesis |
| Renal dysplasia |
| Renal hypoplasia |
| Duplex kidney |
| Horseshoe kidney |
| Ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
| Duplication of the ureter |
| Vesicoureteral reflux |
| Ectopic Ureter |
Table 2.
Human Genetic Syndromes with Defects in Renal Morphogenesis
| Primary Disease | Kidney Phenotype | Gene | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alagille Syndrome | Cystic dysplasia | JAGGED1 | [76] |
| Beckwidth-Wiedemann Syndrome | Medullary dysplasia | p57KIP2 | [77] |
| Brachio-oto-renal (BOR) Syndrome | Unilateral or bilateral agenesis/dysplasia, hypoplasia, collecting duct anomalies | EYA1, SIX1 | [78] |
| Frasier Syndrome | Agenesis, dysplasia | FRAS1 | [79] |
| Hypothyroidism, Sensorineural Deafness, and Renal Anomalies (HDR) Syndrome | Dysplasia | GATA3 | [80] |
| Kallman Syndrome | Agenesis |
KAL1, FGFR1, PROK2, PROK2R |
[81] |
| Renal-coloboma Syndrome | Hypoplasia, VUR | PAX2 | [82] |
| Renal Cysts and Diabetes Syndrome |
Medullary dysplasia | HNF1-ß | [83] |
| Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome | Agenesis, dysplasia | DHCR7 | [84] |
| Zellweger Syndrome | VUR, cystic dysplasia | PEX1 | [85] |
Table 2 adapted from: [86]
The pathogenesis of CAKUT is not well defined. While many CAKUT cases are sporadic, familial clustering is common, suggesting that CAKUT phenotypes are influenced by genetic factors [8]. Data indicate that approximately 20% of patients may have a genetic disorder that is usually not detected with standard clinical evaluations, implicating many different mutational mechanisms and pathologic molecular pathways [5]. A common genetic background with variable penetrance seems to play a role in the development of a spectrum of CAKUT disorders. However, autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive single-gene defects, polygenic inheritance, and large cytogenetic defects (i.e. copy number variations) have been associated with CAKUT [9–11]. Examples of single gene mutations or gene polymorphisms responsible for kidney and urinary tract morphogenesis are outlined below (Table 2). The emergence of high-throughput genomic approaches is expected to provide insight into the common and rare genetic determinants of diseases and provide opportunities for early diagnosis with genetic testing. The following manuscripts provide outstanding reviews [12, 13, 5, 11].
Embryonic Kidney Development:
In humans and other mammals, the kidneys develop through a multistep process, progressing from an anterior to posterior tract. The process begins with the formation of the nephric duct (embryonic day 22 in humans) in the intermediate mesoderm. The nephric duct extends caudally and induces kidney development in the adjacent mesoderm (Figure 1A). There are three stages or segments of embryonic kidneys that develop from the intermediate mesoderm: (A) the pronephros, (B) the mesonephros, and finally (C) the metanephros [14]. The metanephros, which becomes the mature kidney and is detectable around the fifth to sixth week of gestation, develops as the ureteric bud penetrates metanephric mesoderm and undergoes a series of divisions forming the collecting duct, major and minor calyces, renal pelvis and ureter (Figure 1B) [15, 14]. Primitive renal tubules also form from the metanephric mesoderm and as they mature, they become the glomerulus and Bowman’s capsule, the proximal convoluted tubule, loop of Henle, distal convoluted tubule, and collecting tubule [16]. Initially positioned in the pelvis or sacral region, the fetal kidney ascends to its adult position in the thoracolumbar (T12-L3) region in the retroperitoneal fossa. Once in the retroperitoneal fossa, the kidney rotates medially 90 degrees, to its final position by the 8th week of gestation [14].
Figure 1. Embryonic kidney and urinary tract development.

(A) Renal embryogenesis showing development and degeneration of the pronephros (left) and mesonephros (center), with induction of the ureteric bud and metanephric mesenchyme (right). (B) The initiating step in kidney development is the outpouching of the ureteric bud from the Wolffian duct. The stalk of the ureteric bud becomes the ureter (top). The ureteric bud undergoes repetitive branching to form the collecting tubules, major calices, and minor calices (middle). The end of each arched collecting tubule induces clusters of mesenchymal cells in the metanephrogenic blastema to undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transformation that eventually develops into the mature nephron (bottom).
In the prenatal period, the kidney functions to maintain amniotic fluid. After 16 weeks of gestation, fetal urine becomes the primary source of amniotic fluid. Thus, amniotic fluid volume can also be an indicator of abnormal renal development. It is not until the postnatal period that the kidney begins to regulate fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base homeostasis as well as waste excretion [17]. The following sections highlight how aberrant kidney development leads to structural kidney and urinary tract disorders that are routinely encountered in clinical practice. In doing so, the following sections review diagnostic, prognostic, and management approaches to these conditions.
Renal agenesis
Renal agenesis refers to the complete loss of one or both kidneys without identifiable rudimentary tissue. Renal agenesis occurs with failure of metanephros formation and usually is associated with agenesis of the ipsilateral ureter [16, 14]. Causal heterogeneity has been shown, by both animal studies and clinical patient observations. Like many developmental kidney anomalies, renal agenesis is more prevalent in males than females [18]. Unilateral renal agenesis is usually asymptomatic and incidentally detected, whereas bilateral renal agenesis results in severe oligohydramnios and fetal or perinatal loss. Renal agenesis can be associated with anomalies of other organ systems, occurring in both contiguous (i.e. vertebrae, genital organs, intestines, anus) and in non-contiguous structures (i.e. limbs, heart, trachea, ear, central nervous system) [14, 6].
Fetal kidneys can be visualized with ultrasound as early as 10-12 weeks of gestation. Thus, renal agenesis is often diagnosed prenatally. Computed tomography and radionucleotide studies can be helpful in equivocal cases. With unilateral renal agenesis, the solitary kidney may show compensatory hypertrophy – measuring >95th percentile for gestational age [19, 20]. It is important to ensure that the non-visualized kidney is not in an ectopic location or dysplastic in appearance. Therefore, pelvic ultrasound is often warranted. Confirmatory testing includes magnetic resonance imaging.
When performing an initial evaluation on a patient with solitary kidney, a thorough history and physical examination should be obtained to evaluate for extra-renal congenital anomalies – including anosmia, hearing deficits, ear pits, coloboma, cleft lip or palate, single umbilical artery, syndactyly, microphallus, or cryptorchidism [6]. Multiple syndromes are associated with renal agenesis (Table 3). Prenatally, chromosomal microarray analysis has not been shown to be more beneficial than it would be for the general population [21]. Starting at birth, growth charts in these patients should be closely monitored for abnormal or poor growth, which can serve as a proxy for renal insufficiency.
Table 3.
Syndromes associated with unilateral or bilateral renal agenesis
| Caudal Regression Syndrome |
| Cerebro-oculo-facial-skeletal Syndrome |
| CHARGE Association |
| DiGeorge Syndrome (22q11.2 deletion) |
| Fraser Syndrome |
| Mayer-Rokitasnsky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome |
| Melnick-Fraser Syndrome |
| Potter Sequence (oligohydramnios) |
| Trisomy 13 and 18 |
| Turner Syndrome |
| VACTERL |
| Velocardiofacial Syndrome |
Table 3 adapted from: [87]
Long-term sequela includes chronic kidney disease that may develop after longstanding compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration. Therefore, blood pressure and urinalysis should be monitored to evaluate for elevated blood pressure and proteinuria. If either is detected, this may be an indication of injury to the solitary kidney and obtaining a serum creatinine is warranted in order to calculate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [22]. Overweight and obese patients have been found to have greater risk of progression of renal disease [23, 24]. According to 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines, a solitary kidney is not an absolute indication to abstain from contact sports [25].
Ectopic Kidney
Ectopic kidneys, which are often pelvic in location, result from errors of ascent. Rare case reports exist of thoracic kidneys [26]. Ectopic kidneys can be unilateral or bilateral. Bilateral pelvic kidneys often fuse into a midline mass of renal tissue, with two distinct renal pelvises and a variable number of ureters – which is referred to as a pancake kidney. Cross fused ectopia refers to an ectopic kidney whose ureter crosses the midline. Ectopic kidneys are often hypoplastic and smaller in size. Consequently, the contralateral kidney may have compensatory hyperfiltration and hypertrophy [27, 14].
Ectopic and pelvic kidneys are often asymptomatic. Historically, there has been a higher incidence noted in autopsies than those found clinically. However, as ultrasound techniques improve, it is unclear how this paradigm has shifted. If an ectopic kidney is noted on prenatal ultrasonography, post-natal renal ultrasound is recommended to confirm the location of the pelvic kidney. Though some studies have shown no effects on blood pressure and renal function, annual serum creatinine measurements, urinalysis, and blood pressure monitoring are warranted for surveillance and preventive purposes [28]. Similar to renal agenesis, long-term sequela includes chronic kidney disease that develops after longstanding compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration. If changes in blood pressure and/or renal function are detected, this may be an indication of renal insufficiency [22].
Horseshoe kidney
Horseshoe kidney refers to a condition in which the kidneys are fused at the lower poles with a renal parenchymal or fibrous isthmus. The embryogenesis of horseshoe kidney with parenchymal isthmus is believed to be abnormal migration of nephrogenic cells. Most horseshoe kidneys are located in the pelvis at the lower vertebral levels. During kidney ascent, the connecting isthmus of the fused kidneys gets trapped behind the inferior mesenteric artery. Early fusion of the two kidneys may result in malrotation and a higher insertion point of the ureters leading to obstructive uropathy from a ureteropelvic junction obstruction [14, 16].
Horseshoe kidneys effect approximately 1 in every 500 live births and is more common in males. Horseshoe kidneys are typically asymptomatic and found incidentally on prenatal ultrasound; however, patients can have associated ureteropelvic junction obstruction leading to hydronephrosis, urinary tract infections (UTI), and/or nephrolithiasis. Horseshoe kidneys can be associated with other genitourinary anomalies as well as renal tumors – most commonly Wilm’s tumor [29, 30]. There is little evidence regarding preventive sonographic screening, but surgical resection is often difficult due to abnormal vasculature and location of the kidney [31].
Polycystic Kidney Disease
Cystic kidney diseases are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders that may present in utero or be clinically silent into adulthood. Cystic kidney disease genes and their translated proteins have been identified, providing investigators with essential targets to investigate disease pathogenesis and sequelae [32, 33]. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited renal disease, which results from mutations in the PKD1 (major) or PKD2 genes (minor). After diabetes mellitus and hypertension, ADPKD is the most common cause of end stage kidney disease [4]. By the age of 70, 50% of patients with ADPKD will require dialysis or kidney transplantation [34].
The diagnosis of ADPKD relies principally upon imaging of the kidney. Typical findings include large kidney with extensive cysts scattered bilateral (Figure 2). The presence of one cyst is adequate for the diagnosis in a child (0-5 years) with a known family history of ADPKD [35]. Because of cost and safety, ultrasonography is most commonly used as the imaging modality. In certain settings, genetic testing is required for a definitive diagnosis. Kidney size typically increases to more than five time normal in years prior to loss of kidney function. Measured kidney volume is the strongest predictor for the development of renal insufficiency [36]. Other renal manifestations that can occur include hypertension, UTI, urine concentrating defects, kidney stones, hematuria, proteinuria, and abdominal or flank pain. All of these complications relate directly to the extent of renal cyst involvement [37].
Figure 2. Ultrasonography of developmental kidney anomalies.

(A) A large left dilated renal pelvis (stars) and thin renal cortical tissue consistent with uretopelvic junction obstruction. (B) A multicystic dysplastic left kidney with multiple parenchymal non-communicating kidney cysts of varying size (*) and hyperechoic, dysplastic kidney tissue. (C) Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease with an enlarged kidney showing multiple large cortical cysts (*). (A-C) The white dashed line outlines the kidney parenchyma.
Histologically, renal cysts arise from renal tubular segments. These cysts progressively enlarge in all segments of the nephron and cause renal insufficiency [38]. Because ADPKD is a systemic disorder, patients can develop profound extrarenal cystic and non-cystic complications. Among the most important extrarenal manifestations seen in adults are cysts in other epithelial organs (i.e. liver and pancreas) and cardiovascular abnormalities such as mitral valve prolapse and cerebral berry aneurysms. In pediatric populations, these are rarely observed [38].
ADPKD treatment, which is typically overseen by a nephrologist, consists of medical management of chronic renal insufficiency, hypertension, UTI, and pain. Dialysis and kidney transplantation may eventually be needed, even in adolescent populations. Invasive procedures to manage pain consist of percutaneous cyst aspiration and sclerosis, open or laparoscopic cyst decompression, and laparoscopic denervation. Nephrectomy may be needed in patients with end stage kidney disease and uncontrolled pain, recurrent UTI, or extensively enlarged kidneys that interfere with future transplantation [37, 39].
Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) is a subset of renal dysplasia, where there is general structural disorganization of the renal parenchyma with many non-communicating cysts throughout the dysplastic kidney tissue (Figure 2). MCDK is one of the most common congenital urinary tract abnormalities with an incidence of up to 1 in 3,640 births [40]. It is typically sporadic, although familial cases have been reported. There is no laterality preference, and MCDK is slightly more prevalent in males. MCDK can be found in isolation, with other genitourinary abnormalities, or as part of a genetic syndrome [41].
Multiple theories exist regarding the development of a MCDK. The ureteric bud theory hypothesizes that MCDK is due to an abnormal connection of the ureteric bud with the mesenephric mesenchyme [42]. This theory has also been proposed for the pathogenesis of other renal disorders, including vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and renal agenesis. Supporting this hypothesis, mutations in genes known to play a role in ureteric bud development including EYA1, SIX1, and PAX2 have been linked to MCDK, as well as other forms of renal dysplasia [43].
MCDK is often diagnosed by ultrasonography — two-thirds of cases are suspected prenatally [41]. While children and adolescents with unilateral MCDK do well, patients with bilateral MCDK frequently have oligohydramnios with resulting fetal demise, or end stage renal disease in childhood [40]. If MCDK is suspected on prenatal ultrasound, the prenatal diagnosis should be confirmed with a postnatal ultrasound. In addition to confirming the diagnosis, this initial postnatal ultrasound can screen for VUR, contralateral kidney abnormalities, and genital abnormalities [44–46]. On the contralateral side, low-grade VUR has been reported in up to 43% of patients with a MCDK. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO), and ipsilateral structural abnormalities of the internal genitalia have also been reported [44–46]. A voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is not routinely recommended with diagnosis of a MCDK. Indications to perform a VCUG include an abnormal contralateral kidney, lower urinary tract abnormality, or development of a UTI due to risk of pyelonephritis and subsequent scarring in the solitary functioning kidney. Diuretic renograms can be used to evaluate the contralateral kidney for potential UPJO or UVJO when the renal pelvis is dilated ≥ 5mm with a negative VCUG, or > 10 mm with a VCUG showing the presence of VUR [47].
Generally, MCDKs tend to involute over time, with compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral kidney (+2 standard deviations of the mean). The absence of compensatory hypertrophy should be investigated for pathologic conditions such as hypodysplasia. Complete MCDK involution has been reported in up to 74% of patients at two years of age [48]. Thus, serial ultrasounds should be performed to evaluate MCDK involution and growth of the contralateral kidney. The frequency of follow-up ultrasounds is debatable, but 4 weeks, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years has been proposed [49].
Patients with “simple” MCDK (without other urinary tract abnormalities) generally have normal or near-normal renal function. Conversely, 50% of patients with “complex” MCDK (bilateral MCDK, unilateral with contralateral anomalies) show evidence of renal impairment [40]. Thus, serum creatinine should be obtained at diagnosis, 2 years of age, and 5 years of age, to monitor for progression of chronic kidney disease [48]. While blood pressure should be monitored with all clinic visits in older children with MCDK (> 3 years of age), there is little evidence to support they have an increased risk of hypertension. Routine abdominal exams should also be done at well child checks to monitor for abdominal masses that could be due to hydronephrosis or tumor [50].
In the past, nephrectomy of the MCDK was often performed due to the presumed risk of Wilms tumor or other malignant transformation. However, data now suggest that the rate of Wilms tumor is very low and routine nephrectomy is no longer indicated [51]. Nephrectomy may be considered in MCDK patients that have refractory hypertension. However, nephrectomy may only resolve hypertension 25-50% of the time [50].
Vesicoureteral Reflux
VUR is the retrograde flow of urine from the bladder to the kidneys. VUR has been implicated in renal injury before birth as well as in the postnatal development of UTI, pyelonephritis, and further renal damage. The overall incidence of VUR is unknown, as a VCUG is not routinely performed in healthy children. However, VUR has been detected in 8-50% of children, and 36-49% of infants and newborns who underwent a VCUG after presenting with a UTI [52]. The majority of patients with VUR are diagnosed after developing a febrile UTI. Additionally, VUR is often diagnosed when a prenatal ultrasound shows hydronephrosis or hydroureter, in children with unilateral MCDK, or children having significant bladder dysfunction [53–56].
There are multiple potential etiologies leading to the development of VUR, including anatomic anomalies, disrupted cellular signaling, and genetic defects [57, 43, 58]. One hypothesis suggests that during embryologic development the ureteric bud arrives at the urogenital sinus relatively early, causing a lateral and proximal displacement of the ureteral meatus. This results in a shorter intravesical submucosal length of the ureter – predisposing the patient to reflux [52].
The gold standard for the diagnosis of VUR is the VCUG. VCUG is an invasive test and requires urethral catheterization and either fluoroscopy or administration of a radionuclide. This is also the modality that is used to identify the grade of reflux. Grading has been standardized by the International Reflux Study and is categorized as grade I to grade V, with grade V being the most severe. [59] While ultrasound is not sensitive for the detection of VUR, it is the first imaging modality used to look for other renal or urologic abnormalities, including ureteral or renal pelvis dilation seen in high grades of VUR [60]. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine ultrasound screening for children less than 24 months with a febrile UTI [61]. Technetium 99 m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid Renal Scan (DMSA Renal Scan) can be used to look for the presence of renal scars, which may occur due to reflux nephropathy or pyelonephritis [62].
Many children, especially those with low-grade VUR, will outgrow it – likely due to the lengthening of the submucosal ureteral segment as the child grows [63]. The potential for the spontaneous VUR resolution is the basis for conservative non-operative management. Factors that increase the chance of VUR resolution include non-white race, low-grade VUR, absence of voiding dysfunction, and absence renal scarring [64]. Ureteral dilation, increased age at presentation, and bilateral VUR decrease the probability of VUR resolution [65].
Clinical follow-up of VUR is warranted because VUR is believed to be the primary risk factor for pyelonephritis and subsequent renal scarring. Various factors influence the probability of scarring in children with VUR and UTI. These include severity of reflux, age in which VUR patient develops a UTI, delay in treatment, bacterial virulence, genetics, and immune dysfunction [66–69]. After acute pyelonephritis, renal scarring takes about 1-2 years to develop [70, 71]. The pathogenesis of renal scarring after acute pyelonephritis is not well defined. The process is an inflammatory response that is initiated by the presence of bacteria and triggers renal parenchymal damage [72, 66]. Renal parenchymal damage can cause proteinuria, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease.
Management of VUR is divided into medical and surgical treatment. Medical management is based on the observation that low-grade VUR will resolve spontaneously. Medical management may involve treatment of bowel and bladder dysfunction, correcting metabolic disorders stemming from renal insufficiency, blood pressure control, reduction of proteinuria, and serial radiological follow-up. Select patient populations may benefit from daily antibiotic UTI prophylaxis. Surgical management may be considered with co-existing upper or lower urinary tract anomalies or recurrent UTI. The detailed role of medical and surgical VUR management is beyond the scope of this review and have been highlighted elsewhere [68, 73, 74].
Conclusions:
CAKUT are a collection of different disease entities impacting the kidney and/or urinary tract. Despite significant variation in phenotype and clinical implications, CAKUT shares a common genetic basis and molecular signaling that affect kidney development [75]. Since many of these congenital anomalies are hereditary, advances in prenatal diagnostics, imaging, genetic testing, laboratory surveillance, and medical management have improved the prognosis and quality of life in affected families.
Acknowledgements:
We acknowledge Ms. Lisa Feurer for assistance for the artwork shown in Figure 1.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.
Conflict of Interest
Emily Stonebrook, Monica Hoff, and John David Spencer declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References:
•Of importance
••Of major importance
- 1.Piscione TD, Rosenblum ND. The malformed kidney: disruption of glomerular and tubular development. Clin Genet. 1999;56(5):341–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith JM, Stablein DM, Munoz R, Hebert D, McDonald RA. Contributions of the Transplant Registry: The 2006 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS). Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11(4):366–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00704.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, Schlaefer K, Spranger J. Malformations in newborn: results based on 30,940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990-1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;266(3): 163–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seikaly MG, Ho PL, Emmett L, Fine RN, Tejani A. Chronic renal insufficiency in children: the 2001 Annual Report of the NAPRTCS. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(8):796–804. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1158-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.••.Sanna-Cherchi S, Westland R, Ghiggeri GM, Gharavi AG. Genetic basis of human congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(1):4–15. doi: 10.1172/JCI95300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review highlights how common genetic variants impact CAKUT development, prognosis, and clinical care.
- 6.Toka HR, Toka O, Hariri A, Nguyen HT. Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30(4):374–86. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.••.Calderon-Margalit R, Skorecki K, Vivante A. History of Childhood Kidney Disease and Risk of Adult End-Stage Renal Disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(18):1751–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1802894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study shows that a history of clinically evident kidney disease in childhood, including acute kidney injury and structural anomalies, significantly increases end-stage kidney disease risk and has long-term consequences.
- 8.Fletcher J, McDonald S, Alexander SI, Australian, New Zealand Pediatric Nephrology A. Prevalence of genetic renal disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28(2):251–6. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2306-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weber S, Moriniere V, Knuppel T, Charbit M, Dusek J, Ghiggeri GM et al. Prevalence of mutations in renal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: results of the ESCAPE study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17(10):2864–70. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weber S Novel genetic aspects of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24(2):212–8. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834fdbd4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harshman LA, Zepeda-Orozco D. Genetic Considerations in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease. J Pediatr Genet. 2016;5(1):43–50. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1557111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Capone VP, Morello W, Taroni F, Montini G. Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: The Current State of Play. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(4). doi: 10.3390/ijms18040796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vivante A, Kohl S, Hwang DY, Dworschak GC, Hildebrandt F. Single-gene causes of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in humans. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(4):695–704. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2684-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.dos Santos AC Junior, de Miranda DM, Simoes e Silva AC. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: an embryogenetic review. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2014;102(4):374–81. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blake J, Rosenblum ND. Renal branching morphogenesis: morphogenetic and signaling mechanisms. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;36:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.JC Seely. A brief review of kidney development, maturation, developmental abnormalities, and drug toxicity: juvenile animal relevancy. J Toxicol Pathol. 2017;30(2):125–33. doi: 10.1293/tox.2017-0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takeuchi H, Koyanagi T, Yoshizato T, Takashima T, Satoh S, Nakano H. Fetal urine production at different gestational ages: correlation to various compromised fetuses in utero. Early Hum Dev. 1994;40(1):1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Westland R, Schreuder MF. Gender differences in solitary functioning kidney: do they affect renal outcome? Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(11):2243–4. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2473-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Urisarri A, Gil M, Mandia N, Aldamiz-Echevarria L, Iria R, Gonzalez-Lamuno D et al. Retrospective study to identify risk factors for chronic kidney disease in children with congenital solitary functioning kidney detected by neonatal renal ultrasound screening. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(32):e11819. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chow JS, Benson CB, Lebowitz RL. The clinical significance of an empty renal fossa on prenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(8):1049–54; quiz 55-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sagi-Dain L, Maya I, Peleg A, Reches A, Banne E, Baris HN et al. Microarray analysis in pregnancies with isolated unilateral kidney agenesis. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(4):825–8. doi: 10.1038/pr.2018.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Westland R, Schreuder MF, van Goudoever JB, Sanna-Cherchi S, van Wijk JA. Clinical implications of the solitary functioning kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(5):978–86. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08900813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kovesdy CP, Furth SL, Zoccali C, World Kidney Day Steering C. Obesity and Kidney Disease: Hidden Consequences of the Epidemic. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;4:2054358117698669. doi: 10.1177/2054358117698669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gonzalez E, Gutierrez E, Morales E, Hernandez E, Andres A, Bello I et al. Factors influencing the progression of renal damage in patients with unilateral renal agenesis and remnant kidney. Kidney Int. 2005;68(1):263–70.doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grinsell MM, Butz K, Gurka MJ, Gurka KK, Norwood V. Sport-related kidney injury among high school athletes. Pediatrics. 2012;130(1):e40–5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.N’Guessen G, Stephens FD, Pick J. Congenital superior ectopic (thoracic) kidney. Urology. 1984;24(3):219–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guarino N, Tadini B, Camardi P, Silvestro L, Lace R, Bianchi M. The incidence of associated urological abnormalities in children with renal ectopia. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 2):1757–9; discussion 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van den Bosch CM, van Wijk JA, Beckers GM, van der Horst HJ, Schreuder MF, Bokenkamp A. Urological and nephrological findings of renal ectopia. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1574–8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tkocz M, Kupajski M. Tumour in horseshoe kidney - different surgical treatment shown in five example cases. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2012;16(3):254–7. doi: 10.5114/wo.2012.29295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petrovic M, Andrejevic V, Djurasic L, Stamenkovic V, Acimovic M, Pejcic T et al. Tumors of the horseshoe kidney--characteristics and literature review. Acta Chir lugosl. 2012;59(1):53–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yecies T, Turner capital IURM, Ferroni MC, Jacobs BL, Davies BJ. Partial and hemi-nephrectomy for renal malignancy in patients with horseshoe kidney. Can J Urol. 2016;23(1):8156–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.•.Shin YB, Park JH. Recent Trends in ADPKD Research. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;933:3–11. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2041-4_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review highlights newly identified molecular mechanisms and pathological pathways that impact Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease progression and how they may be developed to slow disease progression.
- 33.Malekshahabi T, Khoshdel Rad N, Serra AL, Moghadasali R. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Disrupted pathways and potential therapeutic interventions. J Cell Physiol. 2019. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Churchill DN, Bear JC, Morgan J, Payne RH, McManamon PJ, Gault MH. Prognosis of adult onset polycystic kidney disease re-evaluated. Kidney Int. 1984;26(2): 190–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chapman AB. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: time for a change? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18(5): 1399–407. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007020155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tangri N, Hougen I, Alam A, Perrone R, McFarlane P, Pei Y. Total Kidney Volume as a Biomarker of Disease Progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;4:2054358117693355. doi: 10.1177/2054358117693355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Subramanian S, Ahmad T. Polycystic Kidney Disease Of Childhood. StatPearls; Treasure Island (FL)2018. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Halvorson CR, Bremmer MS, Jacobs SC. Polycystic kidney disease: inheritance, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2010;3:69–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Torra R Recent advances in the clinical management of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. F1000Res. 2019;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17109.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Feldenberg LR, Siegel NJ. Clinical course and outcome for children with multicystic dysplastic kidneys. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2000;14(12):1098–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rudnik-Schoneborn S, John U, Deget F, Ehrich JH, Misselwitz J, Zerres K. Clinical features of unilateral multicystic renal dysplasia in children. European journal of pediatrics. 1998;157(8):666–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mackie GG, Stephens FD. Duplex kidneys: a correlation of renal dysplasia with position of the ureteral orifice. The Journal of urology. 1975; 114(2):274–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Murer L, Benetti E, Artifoni L. Embryology and genetics of primary vesico-ureteric reflux and associated renal dysplasia. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(6):788–97. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0390-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rahman RC, Amoreo O. Multicystic dysplastic kidney: diagnosis and evolution. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2005;20(7):1023. doi: 10.1007/s00467-005-1865-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.John U, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Zerres K, Misselwitz J. Kidney growth and renal function in unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 1998; 12(7):567–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Merrot T, Lumenta DB, Tercier S, Morisson-Lacombes G, Guys JM, Alessandrini P. Multicystic dysplastic kidney with ipsilateral abnormalities of genitourinary tract: experience in children. Urology. 2006;67(3):603–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int. 2002;89(2): 149–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hains DS, Bates CM, Ingraham S, Schwaderer AL. Management and etiology of the unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: a review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(2):233–41. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0828-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Aslam M, Watson AR. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: long term outcomes. Archives of disease in childhood. 2006;91(10):820–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.095786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Narchi H Risk of hypertension with multicystic kidney disease: a systematic review. Archives of disease in childhood. 2005;90(9):921–4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.075333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Homsy YL, Anderson JH, Oudjhane K, Russo P. Wilms tumor and multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. The Journal of urology. 1997;158(6):2256–9; discussion 9-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P, Yoshikawa N, Emma F, Goldstein SL. Pediatric nephrology. 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 53.•.Arlen AM, Cooper CS. New trends in voiding cystourethrography and vesicoureteral reflux: Who, when and how? Int J Urol. 2019. doi: 10.1111/iju.13915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This manuscript reviews the clinical diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies for vesicoureteral reflux.
- 54.Sinha SK, Agarwal A. Current Perspectives in Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55(12):1039–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McKenna PH, Herndon CD. Voiding dysfunction associated with incontinence, vesicoureteral reflux and recurrent urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Urol. 2000; 10(6):599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Spencer JD, Schwaderer A, McHugh K, Vanderbrink B, Becknell B, Hains DS. The demographics and costs of inpatient vesicoureteral reflux management in the USA. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1900-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tokhmafshan F, Brophy PD, Gbadegesin RA, Gupta IR. Vesicoureteral reflux and the extracellular matrix Nephrol. 2017;32(4):565–76. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3386-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shakya R, Watanabe T, Costantini F. The role of GDNF/Ret signaling in ureteric bud cell fate and branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2005;8(1):65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Olbing H, Tamminen-Mobius T. International reflux study in children. Contrib Nephrol. 1988;61:228–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rosenberg HK, llaslan H, Finkelstein MS. Work-up of urinary tract infection in infants and children. Ultrasound Q. 2001;17(2):87–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.•.Subcommittee On Urinary Tract I. Reaffirmation of AAP Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis and Management of the Initial Urinary Tract Infection in Febrile Infants and Young Children 2-24 Months of Age. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this manuscript, the American Academy of Pediatrics updates its guidelines for the management of urinary tract infections in febrile infants.
- 62.Szlyk GR, Williams SB, Majd M, Belman AB, Rushton HG. Incidence of new renal parenchymal inflammatory changes following breakthrough urinary tract infection in patients with vesicoureteral reflux treated with antibiotic prophylaxis: evaluation by 99MTechnetium dimercapto-succinic acid renal scan. The Journal of urology. 2003; 170(4 Pt 2): 1566–8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000085962.68246.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hutch JA. Theory of maturation of the intravesical ureter. The Journal of urology. 1961;86:534–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Silva JM, Diniz JS, Lima EM, Vergara RM, Oliveira EA. Predictive factors of resolution of primary vesico-ureteric reflux: a multivariate analysis. BJU Int. 2006;97(5): 1063–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Smellie JM, Jodal U, Lax H, Mobius TT, Hirche H, Olbing H et al. Outcome at 10 years of severe vesicoureteric reflux managed medically: Report of the International Reflux Study in Children. J Pediatr. 2001. ;139(5):656–63. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.117583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Spencer JD, Schwaderer AL, Becknell B, Watson J, Hains DS. The innate immune response during urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(7): 1139–49. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2513-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Becknell B, Schwaderer A, Hains DS, Spencer JD. Amplifying renal immunity: the role of antimicrobial peptides in pyelonephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(11):642–55. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Becknell B, Schober M, Korbel L, Spencer JD. The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of acute and recurrent pediatric urinary tract infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(1):81–90. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.986097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bahat H, Ben-Ari M, Ziv-Baran T, Neheman A, Youngster I, Goldman M. Predictors of grade 3-5 vesicoureteral reflux in infants </= 2 months of age with pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Garin EH, Olavarria F, Garcia Nieto V, Valenciano B, Campos A, Young L. Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis:a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):626–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Garin EH, Campos A, Homsy Y. Primary vesicoureteral reflux: review of current concepts. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;12(3):249–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Roberts JA. Etiology and pathophysiology of pyelonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991; 17(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Korbel L, Howell M, Spencer JD. The clinical diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections in children and adolescents. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017;37(4):273–9. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2017.1382046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Garin EH. Primary vesicoureteral reflux; what have we learnt from the recently published randomized, controlled trials? Pediatr Nephrol. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rodriguez MM. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and the Urinary Tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014;33(5-6):293–320. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2014.959678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kamatani N, Moritani M, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi F, Hosoya T, Itakura M. Localization of a gene for familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy causing underexcretion-type gout to 16p12 by genome-wide linkage analysis of a large family. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(4):925–9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200004)43:4<925::AID-ANR26>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wolf MT, Mucha BE, Attanasio M, Zalewski I, Karle SM, Neumann HP et al. Mutations of the Uromodulin gene in MCKD type 2 patients cluster in exon 4, which encodes three EGF-like domains. Kidney Int. 2003;64(5):1580–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Otto EA, Loeys B, Khanna H, Hellemans J, Sudbrak R, Fan S et al. Nephrocystin-5, a ciliary IQ domain protein, is mutated in Senior-Loken syndrome and interacts with RPGR and calmodulin. Nat Genet. 2005;37(3):282–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Torres VE. Therapies to slow polycystic kidney disease. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2004;98(1 ):e1–7. doi: 10.1159/000079926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bilous RW, Murty G, Parkinson DB, Thakker RV, Coulthard MG, Burn J et al. Brief report: autosomal dominant familial hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness, and renal dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(15):1069–74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT, de Roux N, Dode C, Dunkel L et al. Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism--pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11 (9):547–64. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mollet G, Silbermann F, Delous M, Salomon R, Antignac C, Saunier S. Characterization of the nephrocystin/nephrocystin-4 complex and subcellular localization of nephrocystin-4 to primary cilia and centrosomes. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(5):645–56. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bellanne-Chantelot C, Chauveau D, Gautier JF, Dubois-Laforgue D, Clauin S, Beaufils S et al. Clinical spectrum associated with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta mutations. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):510–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jira PE, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ, Smeitink JA, Sengers RC, Wevers RA. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome and the DHCR7 gene. Ann Hum Genet. 2003;67(Pt 3):269–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Crane DI, Maxwell MA, Paton BC. PEX1 mutations in the Zellweger spectrum of the Peroxisome bdisorders. Hum Mutat. 2005;26(3):167–75. doi: 10.1002/humu.20211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Geary DA, Schaefer F. Comprehensive Pediatric Nephrology. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P. Pediatric Nephrology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. [Google Scholar]
