Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Aug 27;9(35):e00229-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00229-20

Genome Sequence of a Blattabacterium Strain Isolated from the Viviparous Cockroach, Diploptera punctata

Emily C Jennings a, Matthew W Korthauer a, Joshua B Benoit a,
Editor: Irene L G Newtonb
PMCID: PMC7453276  PMID: 32855240

Here, we report the genome sequence and characterization for a Blattabacterium strain isolated from the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata, which provides amino acids critical for intrauterine embryo development. The genome was assembled by sequencing of the cockroach fat body, which is the location of this obligate symbiont.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the genome sequence and characterization for a Blattabacterium strain isolated from the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata, which provides amino acids critical for intrauterine embryo development. The genome was assembled by sequencing of the cockroach fat body, which is the location of this obligate symbiont.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The Pacific beetle mimic cockroach, Diploptera punctata, reproduces by matrotrophic viviparity. D. punctata embryos develop inside the brood sac, a unique organ that functions as both a uterus and a pseudoplacenta; embryos are provided with nutrients by a secretion of milk-like components (15). The D. punctata milk is deficient in two essential amino acids, tryptophan and methionine (4, 6). It has been hypothesized that endosymbiont metabolism remediates this dietary deficiency; previous research suggests that blattabacteria are the exclusive component of the embryonic microbiome (7). We present a genome analysis of a Blattabacterium strain derived from D. punctata (Blattabacterium sp. strain DPU) to determine the potential role that this endosymbiont has during embryonic development of D. punctata.

Bacterial DNA was collected from fat body tissue dissected from a female D. punctata cockroach using a modified version of previously described protocols (8, 9) with the use of a Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit. Samples were homogenized in 200 μl of sterile 1× phosphate-buffered saline. This extract was passed through a 20-μm glass syringe filter (Millipore) and centrifuged for 10 min at 8,000 × g at 4°C. The resulting pellet was resuspended in the extraction kit lysis buffer, and DNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina Nextera library preparation and HiSeq paired-end sequencing produced 6,778,349 paired-end reads of 75 bp and 4,444,306 reads of 125 bp. Less than 1% of reads were lost during quality control using Trimmomatic (10). metaSPAdes (v.1.2.2, with default settings) implemented in KBase (11, 12) generated 187 contigs with an N50 value of 625,590 bp, which is the length of the largest contig. BLASTn comparison of these contigs to those of the German cockroach Blattabacterium sp. strain Bbge genome (9) identified this largest contig as a candidate genome sequence (E value of <0.0001). Supported by subsequent BLASTn analyses against other Blattabacterium strains (E value of <0.0001), this contig was selected to be utilized as the genome sequence, and other contigs were discarded. BLASTn comparison of all metaSPAdes contigs to the Bbge plasmid (9) revealed that a 2,852-bp plasmid had been assembled as part of the genome; this sequence was removed from the contig for further analyses, producing a 623,008-bp contig with a GC content of 28.03% and 32.997× coverage. Coverage of the genome was assessed by mapping the paired-end reads to the extracted contig using Bowtie 2 (v.2.3.2) with default settings (13).

Prokka (14) identified 618 open reading frames, including 580 coding sequences, 34 tRNAs, 3 rRNAs, and 1 transfer-messenger RNA, using Blattabacterium with a similarity E value cutoff value of <0.0001. Almost all genes required for DNA replication, RNA transcription, and mRNA translational machinery were identified in the assembly (Fig. 1). dUTP nucleotidohydrolase, ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase subunit β, and two hypothetical proteins were identified in the plasmid. Orthology analysis using eggNOG-mapper (15) with the full available database revealed that most coding genes serve in translation and ribosome formation. The next most prominent known genome functions are amino acid metabolism and transport, followed by energy production and conversion. In addition to enzymes for central carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen salvage, metabolic pathway prediction using the KEGG module mapper (16) identified complete biosynthetic pathways for nearly all essential amino acids. The traditional biosynthetic pathway for methionine is incomplete, however. Genes for all enzymatic reactions to produce methionine are present except for metA, which facilitates the conversion of homoserine and succinyl-coenzyme A to O-succinylhomoserine, and the alternative metX, which produces O-acetylhomoserine. An alternative methionine pathway has been suggested in other cockroaches (8), or shared synthesis could occur with the cockroach host based on genes identified in recent transcriptomic studies (5). However, the ability to synthesize selenomethionine is retained. Blattabacterium sp. strain DPU also has the ability to synthesize the nonessential amino acids alanine, arginine, cysteine, glutamate, and glycine.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Genome presentation of Blattabacterium sp. strain DPU. Outer to inner rings represent GC skew (purple and green bars indicate negative and positive skew, respectively), GC content of each strand, RNA genes, including tRNA, rRNA, and transfer-messenger RNA genes (blue), and predicted coding sequences (teal). CDS, coding DNA sequence.

Data availability.

Illumina raw sequence reads and genome sequences have been deposited in association with BioProject PRJNA610624. The plasmid sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession number MT645221.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

E.C.J. received support for this project from a University of Cincinnati Sigma Xi grant. Funding was provided in part by the National Science Foundation (grant DEB-1654417) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant 2018-67013) to J.B.B.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Marchal E, Hult EF, Huang J, Stay B, Tobe SS. 2013. Diploptera punctata as a model for studying the endocrinology of arthropod reproduction and development. Gen Comp Endocrinol 188:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roth LM, Willis ER. 1955. Intra-uterine nutrition of the “beetle-roach” Diploptera dytiscoides (Serv.) during embryogenesis, with notes on its biology in the laboratory (Blattaria: Diplopteridae). Psyche (Camb Mass) 62:55–68. doi: 10.1155/1955/12542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stay B, Coop AC. 1974. “Milk” secretion for embryogenesis in a viviparous cockroach. Tissue Cell 6:669–693. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(74)90009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Williford A, Stay B, Bhattacharya D. 2004. Evolution of a novel function: nutritive milk in the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata. Evol Dev 6:67–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2004.04012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jennings EC, Korthauer MW, Hendershot JM, Bailey ST, Weirauch MT, Ribeiro JM, Benoit JB. 2020. Molecular mechanisms underlying milk production and viviparity in the cockroach, Diploptera punctata. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 120:103333. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ingram MJ, Stay B, Cain GD. 1977. Composition of milk from the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata. Insect Biochem 7:257–267. doi: 10.1016/0020-1790(77)90023-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jennings EC, Korthauer MW, Hamilton TL, Benoit JB. 2019. Matrotrophic viviparity constrains microbiome acquisition during gestation in a live‐bearing cockroach, Diploptera punctata. Ecol Evol 9:10601–10614. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sabree ZL, Kambhampati S, Moran NA. 2009. Nitrogen recycling and nutritional provisioning by Blattabacterium, the cockroach endosymbiont. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19521–19526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907504106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.López-Sánchez MJ, Neef A, Peretó J, Patiño-Navarrete R, Pignatelli M, Latorre A, Moya A. 2009. Evolutionary convergence and nitrogen metabolism in Blattabacterium strain Bge, primary endosymbiont of the cockroach Blattella germanica. PLoS Genet 5:e1000721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, Mclean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, Sneddon MW, Henderson ML, Riehl WJ, Murphy-Olson D, Chan SY, Kamimura RT, Kumari S, Drake MM, Brettin TS, Glass EM, Chivian D, Gunter D, Weston DJ, Allen BH, Baumohl J, Best AA, Bowen B, Brenner SE, Bun CC, Chandonia J-M, Chia J-M, Colasanti R, Conrad N, Davis JJ, Davison BH, DeJongh M, Devoid S, Dietrich E, Dubchak I, Edirisinghe JN, Fang G, Faria JP, Frybarger PM, Gerlach W, Gerstein M, Greiner A, Gurtowski J, Haun HL, He F, Jain R, Joachimiak MP, Keegan KP, Kondo S, Kumar V, Land ML, Meyer F, Mills M, Novichkov PS, Oh T, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Parrello B, Pasternak S, Pearson E, Poon SS, Price GA, Ramakrishnan S, Ranjan P, Ronald PC, Schatz MC, Seaver SMD, Shukla M, Sutormin RA, Syed MH, Thomason J, Tintle NL, Wang D, Xia F, Yoo H, Yoo S, Yu D. 2018. KBase: the United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. 2019. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D590–D595. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Illumina raw sequence reads and genome sequences have been deposited in association with BioProject PRJNA610624. The plasmid sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession number MT645221.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES