Several groups (biovars) of the kiwifruit bacterial canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae are found in Japan. Here, we sequenced and compared 10 genome sequences of biovar 1, a major group in Japan, which is known as the phaseolotoxin producer.
ABSTRACT
Several groups (biovars) of the kiwifruit bacterial canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae are found in Japan. Here, we sequenced and compared 10 genome sequences of biovar 1, a major group in Japan, which is known as the phaseolotoxin producer.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The kiwifruit bacterial canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae was first described in Japan in 1989 (1). Subsequently, P. syringae pv. actinidiae was found in other kiwifruit-producing countries (2). Based on comparative analyses (2–4), P. syringae pv. actinidiae was categorized into several groups (biovars). The first Japanese group was named biovar 1 (P. syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 1 [Psa1]), which was also found in Korea in 1989 (2, 5) and in Italy in 1992 (2, 5). This biovar produces phaseolotoxin (2), a phytotoxin that inhibits arginine biosynthesis in host plants and results in bacterial canker symptom development. On the Psa1 chromosome, a large number of genes involved in phaseolotoxin biosynthesis are accumulated in an approximately 23-kb region (argK-tox cluster), which is contained in an exogenous genomic island (tox island) that Psa1 acquired in the past (2). However, some Psa1 strains found in Ehime Prefecture, Japan (the Ehime isolates), do not produce phaseolotoxin, although they seem to possess the argK-tox cluster (6, 7). On the other hand, several Psa1 strains preserved in the NARO genebank (https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/index_en.php) may lack this cluster (2, 7). Here, we selected 10 strains from the NARO genebank collection (Table 1) that represent Psa1 diversity and conducted comparative genome analyses.
TABLE 1.
Genome data and accession numbers of strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 1 and detail for the argK-tox gene cluster
| Strain | Isolation host, prefecture, yr | Genome information |
PGAPa annotation |
Read information |
argK-tox gene cluster informationb |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GenBank accession no. | Genome size (bp) | G+C content (mol %) | No. of contigs (N50 [bp]) | Total no. of genes | No. of rRNAs (5S, 16S, 23S) | No. of tRNAs | SRAc accession no. | No. of reads (avg length [bp]) | Genome coverage (×) | Phaseolotoxin synthesisd | argK-tox gene cluster | argK-tox gene cluster accession no. | Detail | ||
| MAFF 302091 | Actinidia deliciosa, Kanagawa, 1984 | JAAEYK000000000 | 4,916,203 | 58.2 | 2,497 (2,502) | 6,374 | 2, 1, 1 | 29 | SRR11730631 | 60,196 (236) | 7.7 | + | + | MT551019 | Same sequence as ICMP 9617 |
| MAFF 302133 | Actinidia argute, Kanagawa, 1987 | JAAEYI000000000 | 5,928,911 | 58.8 | 653 (14,454) | 5,654 | 3, 1, 1 | 39 | SRR11730639 | 262,576 (221) | 26.4 | + | + | MT551015 | Same sequence as ICMP 9617 |
| MAFF 302145 | A. deliciosa, Wakayama, 1988 | JAAEYG000000000 | 5,164,482 | 58.4 | 2,311 (3,012) | 6,432 | 3, 1, 2 | 28 | SRR11730634 | 97,845 (210) | 8.0 | + | + | MT551014 | Same sequence as ICMP 9617 |
| MAFF 613024 | A. deliciosa, Shizuoka, 1995 | JAAEYH000000000 | 4,927,103 | 58.2 | 2,470 (2,552) | 6,335 | 2, 1, 1 | 28 | SRR11730633 | 57,728 (235.6) | 7.2 | + | + | MT551013 | Same sequence as ICMP 9617 |
| MAFF 211985 | A. deliciosa, Ehime, 2000 | SMHD00000000 | 5,951,025 | 58.8 | 475 (26,121) | 5,880 | 2, 1, 1 | 44 | SRR11730626 | 286,416 (231.9) | 100.1 | + | + | MT551017 | Synonymous substitution (silent mutation) in some coding genes against ICMP 9617 |
| MAFF 211981 | A. deliciosa, Ehime, 2000 | JAAEYJ000000000 | 5,947,905 | 58.8 | 524 (19,906) | 5,628 | 3, 1, 1 | 41 | SRR11730636 | 527,346 (221.5) | 42.3 | − | + | MT551016 | Synonymous substitution (silent mutation) in some coding genes against ICMP 9617; frameshift mutation in the fatty acid desaturase gene due to the insertion of a single G |
| MAFF 211983 | A. deliciosa, Ehime, 2000 | JAAEYF000000000 | 5,236,580 | 58.4 | 2,155 (3,303) | 6,342 | 1, 1, 1 | 34 | SRR11730632 | 114,619 (230.7) | 8.6 | − | + | MT551018 | Synonymous substitution (silent mutation) in some coding genes against ICMP 9617; frameshift mutation in the fatty acid desaturase gene due to the insertion of a single G |
| MAFF 613017 | A. deliciosa, Shizuoka, 1986 | JAAEYL000000000 | 5,999,477 | 58.8 | 494 (23,006) | 5,606 | 3, 1, 1 | 44 | SRR11730635 | 813,046 (215.5) | 65.0 | − | − | − | Absence of tox island |
| MAFF 613018 | A. deliciosa, Shizuoka, 1986 | JAAEYM000000000 | 5,821,751 | 58.8 | 1,046 (9,663) | 5,914 | 1, 1, 1 | 39 | SRR11730637 | 151,420 (215.5) | 16.3 | − | − | − | Absence of tox island |
| MAFF 212324 | A. deliciosa, Shizuoka, unknown | JAAEYN000000000 | 6,327,049 | 58.6 | 609 (17,836) | 6,120 | 2, 1, 1 | 37 | SRR11730638 | 407,967 (237.2) | 34.9 | − | − | − | Absence of tox island |
PGAP, NCBI Prokaryote Genome Annotation Pipeline.
+, presence; −, absence.
SRA, Sequence Read Archive.
This information comes from Sawada (7).
The strains were cultivated in yeast-peptone (YP) broth at 27°C for 1 day with agitation at 140 rpm. Then, 1-ml aliquots of each culture were used for genomic DNA extraction with a DNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genomic DNA was sequenced using an Ion Personal Genome Machine (PGM) sequencer with an Ion PGM Hi-Q view OT2 kit (for the library preparation), an Ion PGM Hi-Q view sequencing kit (for the sequencing), and a 318 Chip kit v2 (for the sequencing) (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The sequence reads were quality controlled (quality score, <20), and adapter sequences were removed using CLC Genomics Workbench v12 (Qiagen). Using these reads, multiple contigs (filtered with a size longer than 500 bp) were assembled de novo using the same software with default parameters (mapping mode = Create simple contig sequences [fast], automatic bubble size = yes, minimum contig length = 500, automatic word size = yes, performing scaffolding = yes, auto-detect paired distances = yes). The draft genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4. 1 (8).
The guanine and cytosine (G+C) contents and genome sizes for these strains were found to be 58.2% to 58.8% and 4.9 to 6.3 Mbp, respectively (Table 1). PGAP identified 5,606 to 6,432 genes, including multiple rRNA and tRNA genes. In addition, the argK-tox cluster of each strain was sequenced by genome walking. Namely, multiple primers were designed with reference to the contig sequences obtained in this study, a large number of amplified fragments of 300 to 600 bp were obtained, and the full sequences of the cluster region were determined by Sanger sequencing. The obtained sequences (Table 1) were compared with the reference genome (GenBank accession no. CM002753) of ICMP 9617 (pathotype strain of P. syringae pv. actinidiae), indicating that some strains have synonymous substitutions (silent mutations) in the cluster. Moreover, in the Ehime isolates (MAFF 211981 and MAFF 211983), it was clarified that a frameshift mutation in the fatty acid desaturase gene occurred due to a single G insertion, possibly resulting in the loss of the ability to produce phaseolotoxin. In the assemblies of MAFF 613017, MAFF 613018, and MAFF 212324, the tox island containing the argK-tox cluster could not be found, suggesting that the ancestors of these strains may not have experienced the island acquisition event. The fact that such diversification has occurred in the argK-tox cluster is an important piece of evidence for elucidating the pathogenicity, ecology, and evolution of Psa1.
Data availability.
All sequences identified in this study have been deposited in GenBank (see Table 1 for accession numbers).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to M. Taguchi and A. Sasaki for supporting this work. We also thank the members of IFTS-NARO and GRC-NARO for their helpful discussions. We thank Editage for English language editing.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
REFERENCES
- 1.Takikawa Y, Serizawa S, Ichikawa T, Tsuyumu S, Goto M. 1989. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae pv. nov.: the causal bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Japan. Jpn J Phytopathol 55:437–444. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.55.437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sawada H, Fujikawa T. 2019. Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, pathogen of kiwifruit bacterial canker. Plant Pathol 68:1235–1248. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chapman JR, Taylor RK, Weir BS, Romberg MK, Vanneste JL, Luck J, Alexander BJR. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships among global populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Phytopathology 102:1034–1044. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-12-0064-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vanneste JL, Yu J, Cornish DA, Tanner DJ, Windner R, Chapman JR, Taylor RK, Mackay JF, Dowlut S. 2013. Identification, virulence, and distribution of two biovars of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in New Zealand. Plant Dis 97:708–719. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-12-0700-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ciarroni SC, Gallipoli L, Taratufolo MC, Butler MI, Poulter RTM, Pourcel C, Vergnaud G, Balestra GM, Mazzaglia A. 2015. Development of a multiple loci variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) to unravel the intra-pathovar-structure of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae populations worldwide. PLoS One 10:e0135310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miyoshi T, Shimizu S, Sawada H. 2012. Occurrence and distribution of a defective non-phaseolotoxin-producing mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Ehime Prefecture, Japan (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn J Phytopathol 78:92–103. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.78.92. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sawada H. 2016. Characteristics of pathogens causing bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Japan (in Japanese). Annual report on exploration and introduction of microbial genetic resources. 25:103–110. https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/publications_en.php#parent_me25. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All sequences identified in this study have been deposited in GenBank (see Table 1 for accession numbers).
