Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Aug 27;9(35):e00760-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00760-20

Complete Genome Sequence of “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris” RP166, a Plant Pathogen Associated with Rapeseed Phyllody Disease in Poland

Shu-Ting Cho a, Agnieszka Zwolińska b, Weijie Huang c, Roland H M Wouters c, Sam T Mugford c, Saskia A Hogenhout c, Chih-Horng Kuo a,
Editor: Julie C Dunning Hotoppd
PMCID: PMC7453288  PMID: 32855252

The complete genome sequence of “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris” RP166, which consists of one 829,546-bp circular chromosome, is presented in this work. This bacterium is associated with rapeseed phyllody disease in Poland and belongs to the 16SrI-B (i.e., aster yellows) group.

ABSTRACT

The complete genome sequence of “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris” RP166, which consists of one 829,546-bp circular chromosome, is presented in this work. This bacterium is associated with rapeseed phyllody disease in Poland and belongs to the 16SrI-B (i.e., aster yellows) group.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Phytoplasmas are plant pathogens transmitted by phloem-feeding insects from the order Hemiptera. Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) crops are persistently threatened by “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris” (aster yellows group, 16SrI-B subgroup), which causes phyllody diseases (1, 2). Phyllodies are leafy structures that develop in place of flowers and transform the infected plants into sterile “zombies” (i.e., plants that serve only for phytoplasma propagation). These dramatic morphological changes are induced by bacterial effectors (3). To better study the epidemiology of this disease, genomic resources are in great demand for the investigation of pathogenicity genes and the development of molecular markers.

Strain RP166 was collected from a naturally infected winter rapeseed plant at the Field Experimental Station of the Institute of Plant Protection–National Research Institute (Winna Góra, Poland; coordinates, 52.208921, 17.437842). Healthy Macrosteles laevis leafhoppers (Cicadellidae) were allowed to feed on the infected plant to acquire the bacteria. Next, the insects were maintained on healthy barley for several weeks to increase the phytoplasma titers prior to DNA extraction.

Two platforms were used for shotgun sequencing. For Illumina, a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer protocol (4) was used for DNA extraction, followed by the use of a KAPA library preparation kit (catalog number KK8234) and Invitrogen SizeSelect gels (catalog number G6610-02) for ∼600-bp fragments. The MiSeq 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequencing (v3 chemistry) produced ∼10 Gb raw reads. For Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), DNA was prepared using the Illustra Nucleon Phytopure kit (catalog number RPN8510) according to Wouters et al. (5). The library was prepared using the ONT ligation kit (catalog number SQK-LSK109) without shearing or size selection. The MinION run (R9.4 chemistry) produced 1,697,567 raw reads (∼5.9 Gb; N50, 12,607 bp). Guppy v2.3.1 was used for base calling with a minimum quality score of 7; no further processing of the ONT reads was conducted.

The analysis procedure was modified from those described in our previous studies (6, 7). The Illumina reads were quality (Q) trimmed with a Q20 cutoff; reads shorter than 100 bp were discarded. De novo assembly was performed using Velvet v1.2.10 (8) (parameters: hash_length=91, scaffolding=no, exp_cov=30, cov_cutoff=5, max_coverage=500, min_contig_lgth=2000). Putative phytoplasma contigs were identified based on BLASTX (9) searches against a custom database of protein sequences from available “Ca. Phytoplasma asteris” genomes (10). Then, the ONT reads were mapped to the contigs using minimap2 v2.15 (11) to produce a circular scaffold. Finally, an iterative process was used until the assembly was completed. In each iteration, the Illumina reads were mapped using BWA v0.7.12 (12), checked using SAMtools v1.2 (13), and inspected using IGV v2.3.57 (14). For gene prediction, RNAmmer (15), tRNAscan-SE (16), and Prodigal (17) were used. The annotation was based on the homologs in other phytoplasmas (10), as identified by OrthoMCL (18), followed by manual curation using BlastKOALA (19) and GenBank (20). The chromosome was rotated to have dnaA as the first gene.

Strain RP166 has one 829,546-bp circular chromosome with 27.7% G+C content; no plasmids were found. The Illumina and ONT reads provided 116× and 597× coverage, respectively. The annotation contains 6 rRNA genes, 32 tRNA genes, 753 protein-coding genes, and 69 pseudogenes.

Data availability.

The raw reads have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR12000858 and SRR12000859. The genome sequence has been deposited at GenBank/ENA/DDBJ under the accession number CP055264.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Illumina sequencing service was provided by the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK). The funding for this project was provided by the Human Frontier Science Program (RGP 0024/2015) to S.A.H. and A.Z., with additional support from the BBSRC Institute Strategy Programme (BB/P012574/1) and the John Innes Foundation, and by Academia Sinica and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 106-2311-B-001-028-MY3) to C.-H.K. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zwolińska A, Krawczyk K, Klejdysz T, Pospieszny H. 2011. First report of “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris” associated with oilseed rape phyllody in Poland. Plant Dis 95:1475. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang Q, Fu Y, Ma M, Yao Y, Qu Z, Xie J, Cheng J, Jiang D. 2019. First report of phytoplasma groups 16SrI and 16SrV infecting Brassica napus in China. Crop Prot 126:104921. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MacLean AM, Sugio A, Makarova OV, Findlay KC, Grieve VM, Tóth R, Nicolaisen M, Hogenhout SA. 2011. Phytoplasma effector SAP54 induces indeterminate leaf-like flower development in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 157:831–841. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.181586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mugford S, Wouters R, Mathers TC, Hogenhout S. 2020. High quality DNA extraction from very small individual insects. Protocols doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.bg6wjzfe. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wouters R, Mugford S, Biello R, Heavens D, Hogenhout S. 2020. Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from aphids and other sap-feeding insects for long-read sequencing. Protocols doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.bhftj3nn. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chung W-C, Chen L-L, Lo W-S, Lin C-P, Kuo C-H. 2013. Comparative analysis of the peanut witches’-broom phytoplasma genome reveals horizontal transfer of potential mobile units and effectors. Plos One 8:e62770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang S-H, Cho S-T, Chen C-L, Yang J-Y, Kuo C-H. 2015. Draft genome sequence of a 16SrII-A subgroup phytoplasma associated with purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea) witches’ broom disease in Taiwan. Genome Announc 3:e01398-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01398-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cho S-T, Kung H-J, Huang W, Hogenhout SA, Kuo C-H. 2020. Species boundaries and molecular markers for the classification of 16SrI phytoplasmas inferred by genome analysis. Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li H. 2018. minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. 2011. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. 2003. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13:2178–2189. doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. 2016. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Sayers EW. 2018. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D41–D47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw reads have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR12000858 and SRR12000859. The genome sequence has been deposited at GenBank/ENA/DDBJ under the accession number CP055264.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES