Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2016 Jan 15;76(6):597–608. doi: 10.1002/pros.23151

TABLE II.

Multivariable Analyses of AXIN2 in Validation Cohorts

Thomas Jefferson University —Biochemical recurrence
Mayo Clinic Registry—Distant metastasis
OR (97.5%CI) P-value OR (97.5%CI) P-value
AXIN2 expression 0.13 (0.02–0.67) 0.020 AXIN2 expression   0.33 (0.12–0.83)   0.015
Gleason 7 3.29 (0.75–23.11) 0.15 Gleason 7   1.90 (0.71–5.87)   0.23
Gleason ≥8 5.71 (1.20–42.32) 0.046 Gleason ≥8   4.90 (1.77–15.55)   0.0037
pT3a 2.06 (0.63–7.66) 0.025 pT3a   1.07 (0.66–1.73)   0.78
pT3b 1.44 (0.59–3.53) 0.42 pT3b   1.45 (0.86–2.45)   0.16
Lymph node positive   1.23 (0.63–2.39)   0.55
Positive surgical margins 1.00 (0.37–2.76) 0.99 Positive surgical margins   0.56 (0.34–0.90)   0.019
PSA 10–20 1.44 (0.49–4.25) 0.51 PSA 10–20   0.59 (0.32–1.05)   0.073
PSA > 20 2.36 (0.66–9.25) 0.20 PSA > 20   0.57 (0.32–1.01)   0.056
Administration of ADT 2.71 (1.02–7.47) 0.048 Administration of ADT 16.78 (9.31–31.90) <0.001
Administration of radiotherapy   4.05 (2.36–7.12) <0.001

Association of low AXIN2 expression with clinical outcomes (left, TJU: biochemical recurrence; right, MC: distant metastasis), after adjustment for other clinical variables known to impact recurrence.